Search

Introduction Approximately 30% of somatic hospital inpatients experience psychosocial distress, contributing to increased (re-)hospitalisation rates, treatment resistance, morbidity, and direct and indirect costs. However, such distress often remains unrecognised and unaddressed. We established ‘SomPsyNet’, a ‘stepped and collaborative care model’ (SCCM) for somatic hospital inpatients, aiming at alleviating this issue through early identification of distress and provision of appropriate care, providing problem-focused pathways and strengthening collaborative care. We report the protocol of the ‘SomPsyNet’ study, aiming to evaluate implementation and impact of the SCCM on distressed patients’ health-related quality of life. Secondary objectives include assessing efficacy of the screening procedures, influence of SCCM on other health outcomes and associated costs.Methods and analysis Our stepped wedge cluster randomised trial conducted at three tertiary hospitals comprises three conditions: treatment as usual (TAU) without screening for distress (phase 0), TAU with screening but without consequences (phase I, main comparator) and TAU with screening and psychosomatic-psychiatric consultations for those distressed (phase II). The time-of-transition between phases I and II was randomised. Sample size target is N=2200–2500 participants, with 6 month follow-up for distressed (anticipated n=640–700) and a subsample of non-distressed (anticipated n=200) patients. Primary outcome is mental health-related quality of life (SF-36 ‘Mental Health Component Summary score’); secondary outcomes include psychosocial distress, anxiety, depressive and somatic symptoms, symptom burden and distress, resilience, social support and qualitative of life, assessed by internationally accepted instruments, with good psychometric properties. Further, health claims data will be used to assess SCCM’s impact on direct and indirect costs.Ethics and dissemination SomPsyNet adheres to the Helsinki Declaration and is approved by the ‘Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz’ (2019–01724). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and communicated to participants, healthcare professionals and the public.Trial registration number Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal; ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04269005, updated 19.09.2023).

Background: Patient safety is essential for the reliable delivery of health care. One way to positively influence patient safety is to improve the safety and teamwork climate of a clinical area. Research shows that patient safety WalkRounds (WRs) are an appropriate and common method to improve safety culture. The aim of this study was to combine WRs with observations of specific patient safety dimensions and to measure the safety and teamwork climate., Methods: In this observational study, WRs took place in eight work settings across a 770-bed university hospital in Switzerland. During rounds, health care workers (HCWs) were observed in relation to defined patient safety dimensions. In addition, HCWs were surveyed using safety and teamwork climate scales before the initial WRs and six to nine months later, and implementation of planned improvement actions following the WRs was evaluated., Results: During WRs, 810 activities of HCWs were observed, of which 85.4% met the requirements for safe care. Safety and teamwork climate did not change significantly after nine months. A total of 36 action plan items were planned to address safety deficits that surfaced during WRs, but only 40.7% of the action items had been implemented after nine months., Conclusion: WRs with structured in-person observations identified safe care practices and deficits in patient safety. Improvement action plans to address safety deficits were not fully implemented nine months later, and there were no significant changes in the safety and teamwork climate at that time., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Safety Walk Rounds - Clinical unit visits with a focus on patient safety Abstract. Background: Safety Walk Rounds are a promising strategy to promote the safety culture and optimising patient safety. The purpose of this study was to explore patient safety attributes in various clinical areas including recommendations for improvement and leadership support. Methods: Safety Walk Rounds were conducted by the chief patient safety officer based on a structured questions format to open patient safety dialogues with clinicians at the ward level. Field notes were utilized for thematic analyses and topic categorization. Results: A total of 187 clinicians (64 % nursing staff, 19 % physicians, 17 % other health care professionals) participated on the Safety Walk Rounds. The discussion findings are presented in five categories: Events & circumstances (potentially) harmful for patients; safety culture; need for local action, as well as the need for leadership support to provide safe care. Conclusion and outlook: Safety Walk Rounds across the hospitals' clinical areas delivered insight into patient safety issues and safety culture with its caregiver's engagement to provide safe care as well as action points for future improvement including leadership support.

Background: Cardiac troponin T (TnT) is a highly sensitive and specific marker for myocardial damage and can be detected early after myocardial injury. Our hypothesis was to use TnT as an objective marker to verify acute myocardial infarction before hospital admission., Methods and Results: We evaluated the sensitivity of a rapid qualitative assay for serum TnT for the detection of acute myocardial infarction in the ambulance and assessed the predictive value of a positive prehospital TnT test for death and myocardial infarction during 6-months of follow-up. The study, conducted in an urban area, included 158 consecutive patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (93 men aged 69 +/- 13 years). A myocardial infarction was confirmed in 40 and excluded in 118 patients. The prehospital TnT test was positive in 11 patients, of whom 7 had acute myocardial infarction. Fifty-three patients had a positive test result at hospital admission, with evidence of myocardial infarction in 39 of them. The sensitivity to acute myocardial infarction was 18% for the prehospital and 98% for the in-hospital test with 78% and 88% specificity, respectively. During follow-up, patients with a positive prehospital TnT test result had cardiac events more often (9 of 11) than patients with a negative result (26 of 147; P <.0001)., Conclusions: In areas with short transport times to the patient the rapid TnT test performed at the point of care identified only a minority of the patients with acute myocardial infarction. A positive prehospital TnT test result seems to be an objective marker for a worse outcome in patients presenting with suspected acute myocardial infarction.