Search

Peter Alter,1 Cosmina Stoleriu,2 Kathrin Kahnert,3,4 Markus Oliver Henke,5 Robert Bals,6 Franziska C Trudzinski,7 Henrik Watz,8 Tim Speicher,1 Sandra Söhler,1 Tobias Welte,9 Klaus F Rabe,10,11 Emiel FM Wouters,12,13 Claus F Vogelmeier,1 Rudolf A Jörres14 1Department of Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany; 2Asklepios Lungenklinik Gauting, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Gauting, Germany; 3Department of Medicine V, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany; 4MediCenterGermering, Germering, Germany; 5Klinik für Innere Medizin und Pneumologie, Krankenhaus Martha-Maria, Munich, Germany; 6Department of Internal Medicine V, Pulmonology, Allergology, Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany; 7Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany; 8Pulmonary Research Institute at LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany; 9Clinic for Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany; 10LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany; 11Department of Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany; 12Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands; 13Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Health, Vienna, Austria; 14Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, GermanyCorrespondence: Peter Alter, Department of Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Baldingerstrasse 1, Marburg, 35033, Germany, Tel +49 6421 5866140, Email Alter@uni-marburg.deBackground: Many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continue smoking. We used data from the “real-life” COSYCONET COPD cohort to evaluate whether these patients differed from patients with COPD who either had ceased smoking prior to inclusion or ceased during the follow-up time of the study.Methods: The analysis was based on data from visits 1– 5 (covering 4.5 years), including all patients with the diagnosis of COPD who were either ex-smokers or smokers and categorized as GOLD 1– 4 or the former GOLD 0 category. We compared the characteristics of smokers and ex-smokers at baseline (visit 1), as well as the course of lung function in the follow-up of permanent ex-smokers, permanent smokers and incident ex-smokers (smokers at visit 1 who ceased smoking before visit 5). We also identified baseline factors associated with subsequent smoking cessation.Results: Among 2500 patients who were ever-smokers, 660 were current smokers and 1840 ex-smokers at baseline. Smokers were younger than ex-smokers (mean 61.5 vs 66.0 y), had a longer duration of smoking but fewer pack-years, a lower frequency of asthma, higher forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1, 59.4 vs 55.2% predicted) and higher functional residual capacity (FRC, 147.7 vs 144.3% predicted). Similar results were obtained for the longitudinal subpopulation, comprising 713 permanent ex-smokers, 175 permanent smokers, and 55 incident ex-smokers. When analyzing the time course of lung function, higher FRC, lower FEV1 and the presence of asthma (p < 0.05 each) were associated with incident cessation prior to visit 5, while less airway obstruction was associated with smoking continuation.Conclusion: These findings, which were consistent in the cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, suggest that lung hyperinflation was associated with being or becoming ex-smoker. Possibly, it is perceived by patients as one of the factors motivating their attempts to quit smoking, independent from airway obstruction.Keywords: COPD, smoking, smoking cessation, airway obstruction, lung hyperinflation

Peter Alter,1 Kathrin Kahnert,2 Franziska C Trudzinski,3 Robert Bals,4 Henrik Watz,5 Tim Speicher,1 Sandra Söhler,1 Stefan Andreas,6 Tobias Welte,7 Klaus F Rabe,8 Emiel FM Wouters,9 Antonia Sassmann-Schweda,10 Hubert Wirtz,11 Joachim H Ficker,12,13 Claus F Vogelmeier,1 Rudolf A Jörres14 1Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), Germany, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany; 2Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany; 3Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany; 4Department of Internal Medicine V - Pulmonology, Allergology, Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany; 5Pulmonary Research Institute at LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany; 6LungClinic Immenhausen and Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Göttingen, Germany; 7Clinic for Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany; 8LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Department of Medicine, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany; 9Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Health, Vienna, Austria; 10Center for Clinical Studies, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany; 11Department of Internal Medicine I, Pneumology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; 12Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Sleep Medicine, Klinikum Nuremberg, Nürnberg, Germany; 13Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nürnberg, Germany; 14Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, GermanyCorrespondence: Peter Alter, Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), Baldingerstrasse 1, Marburg, Germany, Email Alter@uni-marburg.deBackground: Multimorbidity plays an important role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but is also a feature of ageing. We estimated to what extent increases in the prevalence of multimorbidity over time are attributable to COPD progression compared to increasing patient age.Methods: Patients with COPD from the long-term COSYCONET (COPD and Systemic Consequences - Comorbidities Network) cohort with four follow-up visits were included in this analysis. At each visit, symptoms, exacerbation history, quality of life and lung function were assessed, along with the comorbidities heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), hypertension, sleep apnea, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia and osteoporosis. Using longitudinal logistic regression analysis, we determined what proportion of the increase in the prevalence of comorbidities could be attributed to patients’ age or to the progression of COPD over visits.Results: Of 2030 patients at baseline, 878 completed four follow-up visits (up to 4.5 years). CAD prevalence increased over time, with similar effects attributable to the 4.5-year follow-up, used as indicator of COPD progression, and to a 5-year increase in patients’ age. The prevalence of HF, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, osteoporosis and sleep apnea showed stronger contributions of COPD progression than of age; in contrast, age dominated for hypertension and PAD. There were different relationships to patients’ characteristics including BMI and sex. The results were not critically dependent on the duration of COPD prior to enrolment, or the inclusion of patients with all four follow-up visits vs those attending only at least one of them.Conclusion: Analyzing the increasing prevalence of multimorbidity in COPD over time, we separated age-independent contributions, probably reflecting intrinsic COPD-related disease progression, from age-dependent contributions. This distinction might be useful for the individual assessment of disease progression in COPD.Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, comorbidities, multimorbidity, prognosis, disease progression

Norbert Königsdorfer,1 Rudolf A Jörres,1 Sandra Söhler,2 Tobias Welte,3 Jürgen Behr,4 Joachim H Ficker,5 Robert Bals,6 Henrik Watz,7 Johanna I Lutter,8 Tanja Lucke,1 Frank Biertz,9 Peter Alter,10 Claus F Vogelmeier,10 Kathrin Kahnert4 1Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich 80336, Germany; 2ASCONET Study Coordination Office, University of Marburg, Marburg 35043, Germany; 3Department of Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany; 4Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Munich 80336, Germany; 5Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Sleep Medicine, General Hospital Nuernberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuernberg, Germany; 6Department of Internal Medicine V, Pneumology, Allergology, Respiratory Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg 66424, Germany; 7Pulmonary Research Institute at LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf 22927, Germany; 8Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH – German Research Center for Environmental Health, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich 85764, Germany; 9Institute for Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany; 10Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg 35043, GermanyCorrespondence: Kathrin KahnertDepartment of Internal Medicine V, University of Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Ziemssenstr. 1, Munich 80336, GermanyTel +49 89 4400 2590Email Kathrin.Kahnert@med.uni-muenchen.deBackground: Adherence to COPD medication is often considered to be lower than in other chronic diseases. In view of the frequent comorbidities of COPD, the economic impact of nonadherence and the potential for adverse effects, a direct comparison between the adherence to respiratory and nonrespiratory medication in the same patients seems of particular interest.Objectives: We aimed to investigate the intake of respiratory and nonrespiratory medication in the same patients with COPD and frequent comorbidities.Method: Within the COPD cohort COSYCONET, we contacted 1042 patients, mailing them a list with all medication regarding all their diseases, asking for regular, irregular and non-intake.Results: Valid responses were obtained in 707 patients covering a wide spectrum of drugs. Intake of LABA, LAMA or ICS was regular in 91.9% of patients, even higher for cardiovascular and antidiabetes medication but lower for hyperlipidemia and depression/anxiety medication. Regular intake of respiratory medication did not depend on GOLD groups A-D or grades 1–4, was highest in patients with concomitant cardiovascular disorders and was lowest for concomitant asthma. It was slightly larger for LAMA and LABA administered via combined compared to single inhalers, and lower when similar compounds were prescribed twice. Most differences did not reach statistical significance owing to the overall high adherence.Conclusion: Our results indicate a high adherence to respiratory medication in participants of a COPD cohort, especially in those with cardiovascular comorbidities. Compared to the lower adherence reported in the literature for COPD patients, our observations still suggest some room for improvement, possibly through disease management programs.Keywords: COPD, treatment adherence, respiratory medication, nonrespiratory medication

Objectives: The impact of occupational exposures on lung function impairments and quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was analysed and compared with that of smoking., Methods: Data from 1283 men and 759 women (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 1-4 or former grade 0, without alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency) of the COPD and Systemic Consequences Comorbidities Network cohort were analysed. Cumulative exposure to gases/fumes, biological dust, mineral dust or the combination vapours/gases/dusts/fumes was assessed using the ALOHA job exposure matrix. The effect of both occupational and smoking exposure on lung function and disease-specific QoL (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire) was analysed using linear regression analysis adjusting for age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension and coronary artery disease, stratified by sex., Results: In men, exposure to gases/fumes showed the strongest effects among occupational exposures, being significantly associated with all lung function parameters and QoL; the effects were partially stronger than of smoking. Smoking had a larger effect than occupational exposure on lung diffusing capacity (transfer factor for carbon monoxide) but not on air trapping (residual volume/total lung capacity). In women, occupational exposures were not significantly associated with QoL or lung function, while the relationships between lung function parameters and smoking were comparable to men., Conclusions: In patients with COPD, cumulative occupational exposure, particularly to gases/fumes, showed effects on airway obstruction, air trapping, gas uptake capacity and disease-related QoL, some of which were larger than those of smoking. These findings suggest that lung air trapping and QoL should be considered as outcomes of occupational exposure to gases and fumes in patients with COPD., Trial Registration Number: NCT01245933., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DN received honoraria for lectures from Bristol Myers Squibb, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Mundipharma, Novartis, Hexal and Lilly. Moreover, he received payments for expert testimony from courts and social accident insurances and institutional travel support from LMU Munich and reports personal stocks (mixed). SK received grants (82DZL083B2) from the German Center for Lung Research (DZL). Within the past 36 months, CV received grants or contracts from the German Ministry of Education and Science (BMBF) and from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, CSL Behring, GSK, Grifols and Novartis. Moreover, he received consulting fees from Aerogen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Chiesi, GSK, Insmed, Menarini, Novartis and Nuvaira, and payments for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Aerogen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Chiesi, GSK, Insmed, Menarini, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi. UO is the chair of the Committee for Maternity Protection (Ausschuss für Mutterschutz), Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ). She received payments from GSK for a lecture on vaccination in health settings, from Sozial- und Arbeitsmedizinische Akademie Baden-Württemberg (SAMA) for a lecture on maternity protection and from Akademie für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit im Bayerischen Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit for a lecture on maternity protection. She received support for attending meetings/travel from BMJSFJ and from the LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich. HK is the editor-in-chief of Occupational and Environmental Medicine., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

COSYCONET 1 is the only German COPD cohort which is large enough to be internationally comparable. The recruitment, which started in 2010 and ended in December 2013, comprised 2741 patients with the diagnosis of COPD who were subsequently investigated in regular follow-up visits. All visits included a comprehensive functional and clinical characterisation. On the basis of this detailed data set, it was possible to address a large number of clinical questions. These questions ranged from the prescription of medication, the detailed analysis of comorbidities, in particular cardiovascular disease, and biomarker assessment to radiological and health-economic aspects. Currently, more than 60 publications of COSYCONET data are internationally available. The present overview provides a description of all the results that were obtained, focussing on the relationship between different clinical and functional aspects as well as their potential practical consequences. In addition, information on the follow-up study COSYCONET 2 is given., Competing Interests: Kathrin Kahnert berichtet persönliche Einnahmen über Vortragstätigkeiten der Fa. Astra Zeneca und GSK, welche nicht in Zusammenhang mit der COSYCONET-Studie stehen. Carolina Fischer, Jürgen Behr, Rudolf Jörres, Felix, Herth, Sandra Söhler, Henrik Watz, Inge Kokot, Peter Alter berichten keine Interessenskonflikte. Klaus Rabe berichtet persönliche Einnahmen für Vortragstätigkeiten von Astra Zencea, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesie Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Sanofi & Regeneron, GlaxoSmithKline, Berlin Chemie, Roche Pharma sowie die Teilnahme an Advisory Boards bei Astra Zeneca, Boerhinger Ingelheim und Sanofi & Regeneron, welche nicht in Zusammenhang mit der COSYCONET-Studie stehen. Claus Vogelmeier berichtet über Verträge zwischen dem BMBF, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesie, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Novartis und der Philipps-Universität Marburg, zudem persönliche Einnahmen über Vortragstätigkeiten/Beratungen bei den Firmen Aerogen, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Insmed Menarini, Novartis, Nuvaira, Insmed Menarini, außerhalb der vorliegenden Arbeit. Franziska Trudzinski berichtet persönliche Einnahmen über Vortragstätigkeiten der Fa. Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesie, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Novartis, CSL Behring, welche nicht in Zusammenhang mit der COSYCONET-Studie stehen. Tobias Welte berichtet über Verträge zwischen dem BMBF, GSK, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim und der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, zudem persönliche Einnahmen über Vortragstätigkeiten/Beratungen für Astra Zeneca, Berlin-Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesie, GSK, Novartis außerhalb der vorliegenden Arbeit. Hans-Ulrich Kauczor berichtet Unterstützung der Fa. Bayer an die Universität Heidelberg (Verbrauchsmaterial), Verträge zwischen den Fa. Philips, Siemens und Boehringer Ingelheim zu der Universität Heidelberg, ferner persönliche Einnahme über Vortrags- und Beratertätigkeiten bei Siemens, Philips, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Sanofi außerhalb der hier eingereichten Arbeit. Robert Bals berichtet persönliche Einnahmen über Vortrags- und Beratertätigkeiten von AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Novartis, CSL Behring sowie Fördermittel für das Institut des BMBF, des Competence Network Asthma and COPD (ASCONET), Sander Stiftung, Schwiete Stiftung, Krebshilfe, Mukoviszidose e.V. außerhalb der eingereichten Arbeit., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: The use of maintenance medication in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in real life is known to deviate from recommendations in guidelines, which are largely based on randomized controlled trials and selected populations., Objectives: We used the COSYCONET ( CO PD and Sy stemic Consequences - Co morbidities Net work) cohort to analyze factors linked to the use of COPD drugs under non-interventional circumstances., Design: COSYCONET is an ongoing, multi-center, non-interventional cohort of patients with COPD., Methods: Patients with COPD of Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 0-4 participating in visits 1-5 were included. Data covered the period from 2010 to 2018. Generalized linear models were used to examine the relation of COPD characteristics to different types of respiratory medication., Results: A total of 1043 patients were included. The duration of observation was 4.5 years. Use of respiratory medication depended on GOLD grades 0-4 and groups A-D. Long-acting muscarinic antagonist therapy increased over time, and was associated with low carbon monoxide (CO) diffusing capacity, while inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use decreased. Active smoking was associated with less maintenance therapy in general, and female sex with less ICS use. From the eight items of the COPD Assessment Test, only hill and stair climbing were consistently linked to treatment., Conclusion: Using data from a large, close to real-life observational cohort, we identified factors linked to the use of various types of respiratory COPD medication. Overall, use was consistent with GOLD recommendations. Beyond this, we identified other correlates of medication use that may help us to understand and improve therapy decisions in clinical practice., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01245933.

In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), comorbidities and worse functional status predict worse outcomes, but how these predictors compare with regard to different outcomes is not well studied. We thus compared the role of cardiovascular comorbidities for mortality and exacerbations. Data from baseline and up to four follow-up visits of the COSYCONET cohort were used. Cox or Poisson regression was employed to determine the relationship of predictors to mortality or mean annual exacerbation rate, respectively. Predictors comprised major comorbidities (including cardiovascular disease), lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV 1 ], diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide [TLCO]) and their changes over time, baseline symptoms, exacerbations, physical activity, and cardiovascular medication. Overall, 1817 patients were included. Chronic coronary artery disease (p = 0.005), hypertension (p = 0.044) and the annual decline in TLCO (p = 0.001), but not FEV 1 decline, were predictors of mortality. In contrast, the annual decline of FEV 1 (p = 0.019) but not that of TLCO or cardiovascular comorbidities were linked to annual exacerbation rate. In conclusion, the presence of chronic coronary artery disease and hypertension were predictors of increased mortality in COPD, but not of increased exacerbation risk. This emphasizes the need for broad diagnostic workup in COPD, including the assessment of cardiovascular comorbidity.Clinical Trials: NCT01245933., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Infection control measures for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) might have affected management and clinical state of patients with COPD. We analysed to which extent this common notion is fact-based., Methods: Patients of the COSYCONET cohort were contacted with three recurring surveys (COVID1, 2 and 3 at 0, 3 and 6 months, respectively). The questionnaires comprised behaviour, clinical and functional state, and medical treatment. The responses to the questionnaires were compared amongst themselves and with pre-COVID information from the last visit of COSYCONET., Results: Overall, 594 patients were contacted and 375 patients (58% males, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) 61±22% predicted) provided valid data in COVID1 and COVID2. Five patients reported infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Most patients - except for patients with higher education - reported compliance with recommended protective measures, whereby compliance to hygiene, contact and access to physicians slightly improved between COVID1 and COVID2. Also, patients obtained more information from physicians than from public media. In the majority of cases, the personal physician could not be substituted by remote consultation. Over time, symptoms slightly increased and self-assessed physical capacity decreased. Results of COVID3 were similar. Women and patients with more exacerbations and dyspnoea avoided medical consultations, whereas Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) D patients were more amenable to tele-consultation., Conclusion: In well-characterised COPD patients, we observed on average slight deteriorations of clinical state during the period of COVID-19 restrictions, with high and partially increasing adherence to protective measures. The data suggest that in particular, women and GOLD D patients should be actively contacted by physicians to identify deteriorations., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: K. Kahnert has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.I. Lutter has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Welte reports grants from German Ministry of Research and Education during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: P. Alter has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Behr has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Herth has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H-U. Kauczor reports other support from Bayer and Siemens during the conduct of the study; and personal fees and other support from Philips, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp Dohme and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Söhler has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Pfeifer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Watz has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C.F. Vogelmeier reports grants, personal fees and other support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, personal fees and other support from CSL Behring, Chiesi, Grifols and Nuvaira, and personal fees from Berlin Chemie, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Bals reports grants from BMBF during the conduct of the study; COSYCONET is supported by the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL) grant number 82DZLI05A2 (COSYCONET), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) grant number 01GI0881, and is furthermore supported by unrestricted grants from AstraZeneca GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, GlaxoSmithKline GmbH&Co. KG, Grifols Deutschland GmbH, and Novartis Deutschland GmbH; and grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline and Grifols, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from CSL Behring, grants from BMBF Competence Network Asthma and COPD (ASCONET), Sander Stiftung, Schwiete Stiftung, Krebshilfe and Mukoviszidose eV, outside the submitted work; and a leadership or fiduciary role in the Alpha-1-Center. Conflict of interest: R.A. Jörres has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F.C. Trudzinski has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2021.)

Alterations of cognitive functions have been described in COPD. Our study aimed to disentangle the relationship between the degree of cognitive function and COPD characteristics including quality of life (QoL).Data from 1969 COPD patients of the COSYCONET cohort (GOLD grades 1-4; 1216 male/ 753 female; mean (SD) age 64.9 ± 8.4 years) were analysed using regression and path analysis. The DemTect screening tool was used to measure cognitive function, and the St. George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) to assess disease-specific QoL.DemTect scores were < 9 points in 1.6% of patients and < 13 points in 12% when using the original evaluation algorithm distinguishing between < 60 or > =60 years of age. For statistical reasons, we used the average of both algorithms independent of age in all subsequent analyses. The DemTect scores were associated with oxygen content, 6-min-walking distance (6-MWD), C-reactive protein (CRP), modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (mMRC) and the SGRQ impact score. Conversely, the SGRQ impact score was independently associated with 6-MWD, FVC, mMRC and DemTect. These results were combined into a path analysis model to account for direct and indirect effects. The DemTect score had a small, but independent impact on QoL, irrespective of the inclusion of COPD-specific influencing factors or a diagnosis of cognitive impairment.We conclude that in patients with stable COPD lower oxygen content of blood as a measure of peripheral oxygen supply, lower exercise capacity in terms of 6-MWD, and higher CRP levels were associated with reduced cognitive capacity. Furthermore, a reduction in cognitive capacity was associated with reduced disease-specific quality of life. As a potential clinical implication of this work, we suggest to screen especially patients with low oxygen content and low 6-MWD for cognitive impairment.

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is in widespread use for the evaluation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We assessed whether the CAT items carry additional information beyond the sum score regarding COPD characteristics including emphysema. Patients of GOLD grades 1 to 4 from the COPD cohort COSYCONET (German COPD and Systemic Consequences - Comorbidities Network) with complete CAT data were included (n = 2270), of whom 493 had chest CT evaluated for the presence of emphysema. Comorbidities and lung function were assessed following standardised procedures. Cross-sectional data analysis was based on multiple regression analysis of the single CAT items against a panel of comorbidities, lung function, or CT characteristics (qualitative score, 15th percentile of mean lung density), with age, BMI and gender as covariates. This was supported by exploratory factor analysis. Regarding the relationship to comorbidities and emphysema, there were marked differences between CAT items, especially items 1 and 2 versus 3 to 8. This grouping was basically confirmed by factor analysis. Items 4 and 5, and to a lower degree 1, 2 and 6, appeared to be informative regarding the presence of emphysema, whereas the total score was not or less informative. Regarding comorbidities, similar findings as for the total CAT score were obtained for the modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC) which was also informative regarding emphysema. Our findings suggest that the usefulness of the CAT can be increased if evaluated on the basis of single items which may be indicating the presence of comorbidities and emphysema., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The diagnosis of depression, a frequent comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is often supported by questionnaires, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). It is unknown to which extent its single questions are affected by the clinical characteristics of COPD patients.We addressed this question in 2255 GOLD grade 1-4 patients from the COSYCONET (COPD and Systemic Consequences - Comorbidities Network) COPD cohort. The dependence on COPD severity was assessed using symptoms, exacerbation risk (GOLD A-D; modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (mMRC)), and frequent comorbidities as predictors of PHQ-9 results, while including age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and smoking habits as covariates.Symptoms and exacerbation risk were associated with depression in an additive manner, with mean elevations in the PHQ-9 sum score by 2.75 and 1.44 points, respectively. Asthma, sleep apnoea, gastrointestinal disorders, osteoporosis and arthritis were linked to increases by 0.8 to 1.3 points. Overall, the COPD characteristics contributed to the mean PHQ-9 score by increases from 4.5 or 5.2 to 6.3 points, respectively, when either taking GOLD A as reference or the absence of comorbidities. This finding was independent of the diagnosis of mental disorder or the intake of antidepressants. The presence of COPD led to an increase in the proportion of scores indicating depression from 12 to 22%. Single item analysis revealed homogenous effects regarding GOLD groups, but heterogeneous effects regarding GOLD grades.These findings indicate specific effects of COPD severity on the PHQ-9 depression score, especially symptoms and exacerbation risk, explaining the high prevalence of depression in COPD. Alternative explanations like an overlap of COPD severity and PHQ-9 items are discussed. Of note, we also found COPD treatment effects on depression scores.

Although hyperlipidemia is common in COPD, its relationship to comorbidities, risk factors and lung function in COPD has not been studied in detail. Using the baseline data of the COSYCONET cohort we addressed this question. Data from 1746 COPD patients (GOLD stage 1-4; mean age 64.6 y, mean FEV1%pred 57%) were evaluated, focusing on the comorbidities hyperlipidemia, diabetes and cardiovascular complex (CVC; including arterial hypertension, cardiac failure, ischemic heart disease). Risk factors comprised age, gender, BMI, and packyears of smoking. The results of linear and logistic regression analyses were implemented into a path analysis model describing the multiple relationships between parameters. Hyperlipidemia (prevalence 42.9%) was associated with lower intrathoracic gas volume (ITGV) and higher forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) when adjusting for its multiple relationships to risk factors and other comorbidities. These findings were robust in various statistical analyses. The associations between comorbidities and risk factors were in accordance with previous findings, thereby underlining the validity of our data. In conclusion, hyperlipidemia was associated with less hyperinflation and airway obstruction in patients with COPD. This surprising result might be due to different COPD phenotypes in these patients or related to effects of medication.

Background: An impairment of CO diffusing capacity has been shown in diabetic patients without lung disease. We analyzed how diffusing capacity in patients with COPD is affected by the concurrent diagnosis of diabetes., Methods: Data from the initial visit of the German COPD cohort COSYCONET were used for analysis. 2575 patients with complete lung function data were included, among them 358 defined as diabetics with a reported physician diagnosis of diabetes and/or specific medication. Pairwise comparisons between groups and multivariate regression models were used to identify variables predicting the CO transfer factor (TLCO%pred) and the transfer coefficient (KCO%pred)., Results: COPD patients with diabetes differed from those without diabetes regarding lung function, anthropometric, clinical and laboratory parameters. Moreover, gender was an important covariate. After correction for lung function, gender and body mass index (BMI), TLCO%pred did not significantly differ between patients with and without diabetes. The results for the transfer coefficient KCO were similar, demonstrating an important role of the confounding factors RV%pred, TLC%pred, ITGV%pred, FEV 1 %pred, FEV 1 /FVC, age, packyears, creatinine and BMI. There was not even a tendency towards lower values in diabetes., Conclusion: The analysis of data from a COPD cohort showed no significant differences of CO transport parameters between COPD patients with and without diabetes, if BMI, gender and the reduction in lung volumes were taken into account. This result is in contrast to observations in lung-healthy subjects with diabetes and raises the question which factors, among them potential anti-inflammatory effects of anti-diabetes medication are responsible for this finding.

Objective: In large cohort studies comorbidities are usually self-reported by the patients. This way to collect health information only represents conditions known, memorized and openly reported by the patients. Several studies addressed the relationship between self-reported comorbidities and medical records or pharmacy data, but none of them provided a structured, documented method of evaluation. We thus developed a detailed procedure to compare self-reported comorbidities with information on comorbidities derived from medication inspection. This was applied to the data of the German COPD cohort COSYCONET., Methods: Approach I was based solely on ICD10-Codes for the diseases and the indications of medications. To overcome the limitations due to potential non-specificity of medications, Approach II was developed using more detailed information, such as ATC-Codes specific for one disease. The relationship between reported comorbidities and medication was expressed by a four-level concordance score., Results: Approaches I and II demonstrated that the patterns of concordance scores markedly differed between comorbidities in the COSYCONET data. On average, Approach I resulted in more than 50% concordance of all reported diseases to at least one medication. The more specific Approach II showed larger differences in the matching with medications, due to large differences in the disease-specificity of drugs. The highest concordance was achieved for diabetes and three combined cardiovascular disorders, while it was substantial for dyslipidemia and hyperuricemia, and low for asthma., Conclusion: Both approaches represent feasible strategies to confirm self-reported diagnoses via medication. Approach I covers a broad spectrum of diseases and medications but is limited regarding disease-specificity. Approach II uses the information from medications specific for a single disease and therefore can reach higher concordance scores. The strategies described in a detailed and reproducible manner are generally applicable in large studies and might be useful to extract as much information as possible from the available data., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: The German COPD cohort study COSYCONET ("COPD and SYstemic consequences-COmorbidities NETwork") investigates the interaction of lung disease, comorbidities and systemic inflammation. Recruitment took place from 2010 to 2013 in 31 study centers. In addition to the baseline visit, follow-up visits are scheduled at 6, 18, 36 and 54 months after baseline. The study also comprises a biobank, image bank, and includes health economic data. Here we describe the study design of COSYCONET and present baseline data of our COPD cohort., Methods: Inclusion criteria were broad in order to cover a wide range of patterns of the disease. In each visit, patients undergo a large panel of assessments including e.g. clinical history, spirometry, body plethysmography, diffusing capacity, blood samples, 6-min walk-distance, electrocardiogram and echocardiography. Chest CTs are collected if available and CTs and MRIs are performed in a subcohort. Data are entered into eCRFs and subjected to several stages of quality control., Results: Overall, 2741 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of COPD were included (59% male; mean age 65 ± 8.6 years (range 40-90)). Of these, 8/35/32/9% presented with GOLD stages I-IV; 16% were uncategorized, including the former GOLD-0 category. 24% were active smokers, 68% ex-smokers and 8% never-smokers. Data completeness was 96% for the baseline items., Conclusion: The German COPD cohort comprises patients with advanced and less advanced COPD. This is particularly useful for studying the time course of COPD in relation to comorbidities. Baseline data indicate that COSYCONET offers the opportunity to investigate our research questions in a large-scale, high-quality dataset., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The myosuppressins (X1DVX2HX3FLRFamide), which reduce the frequency of insect muscle contractions, constitute a subgroup of the FMRFamide-related peptides. In the cockroach Leucophaea maderae, we have examined whether leucomyosuppressin (pQDVDHVFLRFamide) is present in the accessory medulla, viz., the circadian clock, which governs circadian locomotor activity rhythms. Antisera that specifically recognize leucomyosuppressin stain one to three neurons near the accessory medulla. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry has confirmed the presence of leucomyosuppressin in the isolated accessory medulla. Injections of 1.15 pmol leucomyosuppressin into the vicinity of the accessory medulla at various circadian times have revealed no statistically significant effects on the phase of circadian locomotor activity rhythms. This is consistent with the morphology of the myosuppressin-immunoreactive neurons, which restrict their arborizations to the circadian clock and other optic lobe neuropils. Thus, leucomyosuppressin might play a role in the circadian system other than in the control of locomotor activity rhythms.

Adipokinetic hormone (AKH) peptides in insects serve the endocrine control of energy supply. They also produce, however, neuronal, vegetative, and motor effects, suggesting that AKHs orchestrate adaptive behavior by multiple actions. We have cloned, for Periplaneta americana, the AKH receptor to determine its localization and, based on current measurements in neurons and heterologous expression systems, the mechanisms of AKH actions. Apart from fat body, various neurons express the AKH receptor, among them abdominal dorsal unpaired median (DUM) neurons, which release the biogenic amine octopamine. They are part of the arousal system and are involved in the control of circulation and respiration. Both the two Periplaneta AKHs activate the Gs pathway, and AKH I also potently activates Gq. AKH I and--with much less efficacy--AKH II accelerate spiking of DUM neurons through an increase of the pacemaking Ca2+ current. Because the AKHs are released from the corpora cardiaca into the hemolymph, they must penetrate the blood-brain barrier for acting on neurons. That this happens was shown electrophysiologically by applying AKH I to an intact ganglion. Systemically injected AKH I stimulates locomotion potently in striking contrast to AKH II. This behavioral difference can be traced back conclusively to the different effectiveness of the AKHs on the level of G proteins. Our findings also show that AKHs act through the same basic mechanisms on neuronal and nonneuronal cells, and they support an integration of metabolic and neuronal effects in homoeostatic mechanisms.