Search

Abstract Obesity is a chronic disease resulting from multifactorial causes mainly related to lifestyle (sedentary lifestyle, inadequate eating habits) and to other conditions such as genetic, hereditary, psychological, cultural, and ethnic factors. The weight loss process is slow and complex, and involves lifestyle changes with an emphasis on nutritional therapy, physical activity practice, psychological interventions, and pharmacological or surgical treatment. Because the management of obesity is a long-term process, it is essential that the nutritional treatment contributes to the maintenance of the individual’s global health. The main diet-related causes associated with excess weight are the high consumption of ultraprocessed foods, which are high in fats, sugars, and have high energy density; increased portion sizes; and low intake of fruits, vegetables, and grains. In addition, some situations negatively interfere with the weight loss process, such as fad diets that involve the belief in superfoods, the use of teas and phytotherapics, or even the avoidance of certain food groups, as has currently been the case for foods that are sources of carbohydrates. Individuals with obesity are often exposed to fad diets and, on a recurring basis, adhere to proposals with promises of quick solutions, which are not supported by the scientific literature. The adoption of a dietary pattern combining foods such as grains, lean meats, low-fat dairy, fruits, and vegetables, associated with an energy deficit, is the nutritional treatment recommended by the main international guidelines. Moreover, an emphasis on behavioral aspects including motivational interviewing and the encouragement for the individual to develop skills will contribute to achieve and maintain a healthy weight. Therefore, this Position Statement was prepared based on the analysis of the main randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses that tested different nutrition interventions for weight loss. Topics in the frontier of knowledge such as gut microbiota, inflammation, and nutritional genomics, as well as the processes involved in weight regain, were included in this document. This Position Statement was prepared by the Nutrition Department of the Brazilian Association for the Study of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome (ABESO), with the collaboration of dietitians from research and clinical fields with an emphasis on strategies for weight loss.

BACKGROUND: After Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to avoid rapid gastric emptying, dumping syndrome and regained weight due to possible dilation of the gastric pouch, was proposed to place a ring around the gastric pouch. AIM: To compare weight loss, consumption of macronutrients and the frequency of vomiting among patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with and without the placement of a constriction ring around the pouch. METHOD: A retrospective study, in which an analysis of medical records was carried out, collecting data of two groups of patients: those who underwent the operation with the placement of a constriction ring (Ring Group) and those who underwent without the placement of a ring (No-Ring Group). The food intake data were analyzed using three 24-hour recalls collected randomly in postoperative nutritional accompaniment. Data on the percentage of excess weight loss and the occurrence of vomiting were collected using the weight corresponding to the most recent report at the time of data collection. RESULTS: Medical records of 60 patients were analyzed: 30 from the Ring Group (women: 80%) and 30 from the No-Ring Group (women: 87%). The average time since the Ring Group underwent the operation was 88±17.50 months, and for the No-Ring Group 51±15.3 months. The percentage of excess weight loss did not differ between the groups. The consumption of protein (g), protein/kg of weight, %protein and fiber (g) were higher in the No-Ring Group. The consumption of lipids (g) was statistically higher in the Ring Group. The percentage of patients who never reported any occurrence was statistically higher in the No-Ring Group (80%vs.46%). The percentage who frequently reported the occurrence was statistically higher in the Ring Group (25%vs.0%). CONCLUSION: The placement of a ring seems to have no advantages in weight loss, favoring a lower intake of protein and fiber and a higher incidence of vomiting, factors that have definite influence in the health of the bariatric patient.

RACIONAL: A tomografia computadorizada é o padrão-ouro para a medida da gordura abdominal visceral. No entanto é dispendiosa e envolve submeter os doentes à radiação ionizante. OBJETIVO: Validar o método ultrassonográfico para avaliação da gordura abdominal visceral em obesos clinicamente graves de ambos os sexos. MÉTODOS: A amostra incluiu adultos com obesidade clinicamente grave que apresentavam índice de massa corporal de 40kg/m² ou entre 35kg/m² e 40kg/m² com comorbidades associadas. Os exames realizados para medição da espessura da gordura visceral foram: ultrassonografia e de tomografia computadorizada. Foram realizados dois exames para avaliação da reprodutibilidade interobservador em uma subamostra de pacientes. O estudo ultrassonográfico foi validado comparando-o aos resultados do exame tomográfico. RESULTADOS: Participaram do estudo 13 pacientes, sendo 61,54% mulheres com IMC médio de 38,82kg/m². A validação foi feita pelo coeficiente de correlação de Pearson resultando ser igual a 0,94 (p = 0,0005). Evidenciou-se correlação positiva e forte entre as duas medidas. Quanto aos resultados da reprodutibilidade, o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse interobservador foi igual a 0,822 com intervalo de confiança de 95% (-0,076 a 0,980), o que revela boa concordância interobservador. A diferença média entre os dois observadores na ultrassonografia foi igual a 0,10 ± 1,51 (p = 0,8898), não significativa e sem viés significativo interobservador. CONCLUSÃO: Foi efetiva a validação do exame ultrassonográfico como substituição ao tomográfico para avaliar a gordura abdominal visceral entre obesos clinicamente graves. A medida ultrassonográfica independe do examinador.