Search

Pancreatic undifferentiated carcinoma (UDC) is a rare tumor with a worse prognosis than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Recent study showed that UDC exhibits loss of SMARCB1, which is one of the subunits of the SWI/SNF complex. However, whether there are abnormalities of other SWI/SNF complex subunits in UDC has remained unknown. In this study, we attempted to clarify whether the loss of SWI/SNF complex subunits is related to the pathogenesis of UDC by comparing undifferentiated component (UC) and ductal adenocarcinoma component (DAC). Genetic analysis of the ten UCs and six DACs was performed. The expression of ARID1A, SMARCA2, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, SMARCC1, and SMARCC2 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues collected by surgical resection from 18 UDC patients was evaluated immunohistochemically. Moreover, two pancreatic cell lines were evaluated for the effects of siARID1A on the mRNA and protein expression of E-cadherin, vimentin, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related markers by qRT-PCR, western blotting, and immunofluorescence staining. UCs tended to have a higher frequency of mutation in ARID1A, SMARCA4, and SMARCC2 than DACs. Immunohistochemically, UCs revealed reduced/lost expression of ARID1A (72%), SMARCB1 (44%), SMARCC1 (31%), and SMARCC2 (67%). Reduced/lost expression of ARID1A, SMARCB1, and SMARCC2 was significantly more frequently observed in UCs than in DACs. In the pancreatic cell lines, western blotting and qRT-PCR showed that the downregulation of ARID1A increased the expression of vimentin and EMT-related markers. Our results suggest that the abnormality of SWI/SNF complex subunits, especially ARID1A, is one of the factors behind the morphological change of UDC.

Invasive gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is preceded by two main types of precursor lesions: intracholecystic papillary-tubular neoplasms (ICPNs) and biliary intraepithelial neoplasias (BilINs). Invasive GBCs with an ICPN component have more favorable prognoses than those without an ICPN component. Some BilINs show a relatively exophytic papillary pattern but do not meet the ICPN criteria; at our institution, we call these papillary neoplasias. To clarify the clinical significance of papillary neoplasia, we herein examined 80 invasive GBCs and classified them into three groups based on the type of preinvasive lesions: those with ICPN (ICPN group, n = 35), those with papillary neoplasia (pap-neoplasia group, n = 13), and those without ICPN/papillary neoplasia (group without ICPN/pap-neoplasia, n = 32). We then compared the prognostic differences and characterized the tumors of each group by determining the immunohistochemical expressions of various biomarkers. The overall survival periods of the ICPN and pap-neoplasia groups were significantly longer than that of the group without ICPN/pap-neoplasia (P 0.0001, P = 0.0036, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that lacking ICPN/papillary neoplasia was independently associated with poor prognosis (P = 0.0007), as were poor differentiation (P = 0.0395), presence of preoperative symptoms (P = 0.0488), and advanced stage (P = 0.0234). Invasive components of the ICPN and pap-neoplasia groups were characterized by higher expressions of p16 and p53 compared with those of the group without ICPN/pap-neoplasia. The prognoses of the invasive GBCs with either papillary neoplasia or ICPN were thus more favorable than those of the invasive GBCs without ICPN/pap-neoplasia. Invasive GBCs with exophytic papillary preinvasive lesions (ICPN and papillary neoplasia) may be biologically different from those without such lesions.

A 54-year-old man with pancreatic head tumor had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy and was diagnosed with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (P-NET) associated with sporadic multiple endocrine neoplasm type 1. Five years after the resection, P-NET recurred and liver metastases were observed. He was treated with a somatostatin analog. Eleven years after the resection, computed tomography revealed a new pancreatic hypodense and hypovascular mass adjacent to the P-NET that was diagnosed as pancreatic adenocarcinoma via endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. He underwent a total remnant pancreatectomy. Pathological examination showed that the lesion was constituted by a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and a neuroendocrine tumor. Additionally, the invasive ductal carcinoma collided with the neuroendocrine tumor. Both PDAC and P-NET cells were observed in the collision area. We could observe the onset of PDAC during the treatment of P-NET. Moreover, we are the first to report the case of a collision of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine tumors diagnosed preoperatively.

Aim As the prognosis of patients who undergo resection for pancreatic cancer has improved, reports of remnant pancreatic cancer after pancreatic cancer resection have been increasing. Previous studies regarding early‐stage pancreatic cancer showed a high incidence of remnant pancreatic cancer in these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of remnant pancreatic cancer according to the degree of progression of the initial pancreatic cancer. Methods Patients who underwent partial pancreatic resection for primary pancreatic cancer were retrospectively reviewed and divided into an early‐stage group and an advanced‐stage group according to the stage of the initial cancer. Patient characteristics and long‐term outcomes, including development of remnant pancreatic cancer, were compared between the two groups. Results This study included 321 patients who underwent partial pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer; 32 patients in the early‐stage group and 289 patients in the advanced‐stage group. Remnant pancreatic cancer developed in 19 patients (5.9%); seven patients (21.9%) in the early‐stage group and 12 patients (4.5%) in the advanced‐stage group. The cumulative incidence of remnant pancreatic cancer according to the Kaplan–Meier method was comparable between the two groups (5‐year cumulative incidence: 20.6% vs 9.9%, early‐stage group vs advanced‐stage group; P = .1827). Conclusion Our results suggested that the potential for developing remnant pancreatic cancer was comparable between the early‐stage and the advanced‐stage groups. Therefore, the incidence of remnant pancreatic cancer may increase along with improved pancreatic cancer treatment., Remnant pancreatic cancer occasionally develops after pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer. Although the proportion of patients who develop remnant pancreatic cancer was larger in early‐stage pancreatic cancer than advanced‐stage cancer, the potential for developing remnant pancreatic cancer was comparable between early‐stage cancer and advanced‐stage cancer.

Hypoxia is a characteristic feature of the tumor microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We have recently explored new targeting molecules and pathways in PDAC cells under hypoxic conditions. In this study, we performed a microarray experiment to analyze the genes up-regulated in PDAC cell lines under hypoxia compared to normoxia, and identified human family with sequence similarity 115, member C (FAM115C) as a candidate gene for further study. Our data showed that FAM115C was overexpressed in PDAC cell lines under hypoxia, and FAM115C inhibition promoted PDAC cell migration and invasion in vitro. FAM115C inhibition did not affect tumor cell proliferation in PDAC. Immunohistochemically, FAM115C expression was observed ubiquitously in normal pancreas, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) and PDAC tissue, and it was located mainly in the nucleus but also in the cytoplasm of cells. In qPCR analysis, high expression of FAM115C was correlated with better prognosis in patients with PDAC. Our findings suggest that FAM115C could be a novel tumor suppressor associated with prolonged survival in patients with PDAC.

Background/objectives Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by excessive desmoplasia and autophagy-dependent tumorigenic growth. Pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) as a predominant stromal cell type play a critical role in PDAC biology. We have previously reported that autophagy facilitates PSC activation, however, the mechanism remains unknown. We investigated the mechanism of autophagy in PSC activation. Methods We compared gene expression profiles between patient-derived PSCs from pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis using a microarray. The stromal expression of target gene in specimen of PDAC patients (n = 63) was analyzed. The effect of target gene on autophagy and activation of PSCs was investigated by small interfering RNAs transfection, and the relationship between autophagy and ER stress was investigated. We analyzed the growth and fibrosis of xenografted tumor by orthotopic models. Results In analysis of gene expression microarray, endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 2 (ERAP2) upregulated in cancer-associated PSCs was identified as the target gene. High stromal ERAP2 expression is associated with a poor prognosis of PDAC patients. Knockdown of ERAP2 inhibited unfolded protein response mediated autophagy, and led to inactivation of PSCs, thereby attenuating tumor-stromal interactions by inhibiting production of IL-6 and fibronectin. In vivo, the promoting effect of PSCs on xenografted tumor growth and fibrosis was inhibited by ERAP2 knockdown. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate a novel mechanism of PSCs activation regulated by autophagy. ERAP2 as a promising therapeutic target may provide a novel strategy for the treatment of PDAC.

Accumulation of evidence suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the outcomes of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) has been widely accepted as systemic chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer and reportedly results in remarkable tumor shrinkage. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using neoadjuvant GnP for BRPC. The medical records of 57 patients who underwent treatment of BRPC from 2010 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The patient characteristics and short- and intermediate-term outcomes were compared between the GnP and upfront surgery (UFS) groups. The GnP group comprised 31 patients and the UFS group comprised 26 patients. The patient characteristics were comparable with the exception of a higher prevalence of arterial involvement in the GnP group. Twenty-seven of the 31 patients (87%) in the GnP group and all 26 patients in the UFS group underwent resection. The GnP group showed a significantly shorter operation time (429 vs. 509.5 min, p = 0.0068), less blood loss (760 vs. 1324 ml, p = 0.0115), and a higher R0 resection rate (100% vs. 77%, p = 0.0100) than the UFS group. Postoperative complications and hospital stay were comparable between the two groups, and no treatment-related mortality occurred in either group. Both the disease-free survival and overall survival times were significantly longer in the GnP group (p = 0.0018 and p = 0.0024, respectively). Neoadjuvant GnP is a safe and effective treatment strategy for BRPC. It potentially improves patients’ prognosis and facilitates surgical procedures.

A 54-year-old man with pancreatic head tumor had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy and was diagnosed with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (P-NET) associated with sporadic multiple endocrine neoplasm type 1. Five years after the resection, P-NET recurred and liver metastases were observed. He was treated with a somatostatin analog. Eleven years after the resection, computed tomography revealed a new pancreatic hypodense and hypovascular mass adjacent to the P-NET that was diagnosed as pancreatic adenocarcinoma via endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. He underwent a total remnant pancreatectomy. Pathological examination showed that the lesion was constituted by a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and a neuroendocrine tumor. Additionally, the invasive ductal carcinoma collided with the neuroendocrine tumor. Both PDAC and P-NET cells were observed in the collision area. We could observe the onset of PDAC during the treatment of P-NET. Moreover, we are the first to report the case of a collision of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine tumors diagnosed preoperatively.

"Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC)" has been accepted as a synonym for pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC). Pancreatic ASC can show salivary gland-type MEC-like morphology. CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene is a characteristic molecular feature of MEC of the salivary gland. We conducted this study to clarify whether the pancreatic ASC with salivary gland-type MEC-like morphology (Pan-MEC) is a pancreatic counterpart of salivary gland-type MEC (Sal-MEC). We retrospectively analyzed 37 pancreatic ASCs including 16 Pan-MECs and 21 tumors without MEC-like features (ASC-NOS [not otherwise specified]), and we investigated (1) clinicopathologic features, (2) the presence of CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, (3) the presence of rearrangement of MAML2 gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and (4) mucin core proteins by immunohistochemistry. We also compared 16 Pan-MECs with 20 Sal-MECs by immunohistochemistry for mucin core protein. There were no significant differences of any clinicopathologic characteristics and survival analysis between the Pan-MECs and ASCs-NOS. Of note, the pancreatic ASCs (including Pan-MEC and ASC-NOS) were significantly more aggressive than conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In addition, all Pan-MECs were histologically high-grade. CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene and MAML2 gene rearrangement were not detected in any ASCs including Pan-MECs. There were significant differences of MUC5AC and MUC6 between the Pan-MECs and Sal-MECs, but no significant differences of mucin core protein between the Pan-MECs and pancreatic ASCs-NOS. Pan-MEC is histologically and biologically high-grade and unrelated to CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene, unlike Sal-MEC which is related to CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene. Pan-MEC is not a pancreatic counterpart of CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene-related Sal-MEC.

Cases of “pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) concomitant with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm” (IPMN) have multiple PDAC lesions more frequently than cases of “PDAC without IPMN”. However, the mechanism of carcinogenesis in this former disease category remains unknown. The main objective of this work was thus to investigate the effects of chronic inflammation on carcinogenesis in PDAC cases. We selected 31 “PDAC concomitant with IPMN” patients and 58 “PDAC without IPMN” patients and pathologically evaluated their background pancreatic parenchyma. Fibrosis and inflammation scores of background pancreas were higher in “PDAC concomitant with IPMN” than in “PDAC without IPMN” (P

Progress in diagnostic modalities, surgical procedures, and multidisciplinary treatment for pancreatic diseases has increased the number of long-term survivors after pancreatic resection. Several reports have focused on high-risk lesions (HRLs), including high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, high-grade intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), and IPMN with an associated invasive carcinoma, in the remnant pancreas after partial pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer or IPMN. The etiology of HRLs in the remnant pancreas is thought to be either isolated local recurrence of the initial lesion in the remnant pancreas or a newly developed primary lesion. Although it is difficult to distinguish between local recurrence and a new primary lesion, comparison of genetic alterations between two lesions may help with this distinction. Early detection of HRLs in the remnant pancreas may improve the prognosis of patients, and several investigators have proposed predictive factors for HRLs in the remnant pancreas after partial pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer or IPMN. The reported short- and long-term outcomes of surgical resection of HRLs in the remnant pancreas are relatively favorable. Life-long surveillance of the remnant pancreas is recommended after partial pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer or IPMN.

Objective To determine the factors predicting the subsequent development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in remnant pancreas (PDAC-RP) after partial pancreatectomy for PDAC. Summary background data PDAC-RP after partial pancreatectomy for PDAC is currently not so rare because of improved prognosis of PDAC patients due to recent advances in surgical techniques and adjuvant therapy. However, the predictive factors related to PDAC-RP remain unknown. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of a consecutive series of 379 patients with PDAC treated by partial pancreatectomy between 1992 and 2015; 14 patients (3.69%) had PDAC-RP. Clinicopathological variables were compared between PDAC-RP and non-PDAC-RP. Results In univariate analysis, concomitant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) (P = 0.0005), cancer location (body/tail) (P = 0.0060), and lower T factor in UICC (P = 0.0039) were correlated with PDAC-RP development. Multivariate analysis revealed concomitant IPMN (P = 0.0135) to be an independent predictive factor for PDAC-RP. PDAC concomitant with IPMN had higher cumulative incidence of PDAC-RP (47.5%/10 yrs) than PDAC without IPMN (9.96%/10 yrs) (P = 0.0071). Moreover, the density of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions in the background pancreas of cases of PDAC concomitant with IPMN (1.86/cm) was higher than that of cases of PDAC without IPMN (0.91/cm) (P = 0.0007). Conclusions Concomitant IPMN in PDAC is an independent predictive factor for the development of new PDAC in remnant pancreas. Cancer susceptibility of remnant pancreas after resection for PDAC concomitant with IPMN is probably due to an increased density of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions.

The biological features of cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics of non-functioning PNETs (NF-PNETs) with a cystic component.The medical records of 75 patients with NF-PNETs who had undergone resection in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological factors were compared between PNETs with and without a cystic component. Expression of somatostatin 2 receptor (SSTR-2) was also analyzed.Cystic PNETs were diagnosed in 14 patients (19%). The proportion of men was significantly higher for cystic than solid PNETs (79% vs. 44%, P 0.05) and cystic PNETs were significantly larger than solid PNETs (25 mm vs. 17 mm, P 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in the prevalence of lymph node metastases (14% vs. 10%, P = 0.64), hepatic metastasis (7% vs. 3%, P = 0.54), or disease-free survival rate (both 86%, P = 0.29) between PNETs with and without a cystic component. SSTR-2 expression was more frequently observed in PNETs with a cystic component than in those without (100% vs. 70%, P 0.01).Although cystic PNETs were larger upon diagnosis than solid PNETs in this study, prognosis after surgical resection did not differ significantly between these types of PNET. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and somatostatin analogues may be more useful for diagnosing and treating cystic PNETs, respectively.