Search

Introduction: The role of endovascular treatment in cervical artery dissection (CAD) is equivocal. This study compared cerebral blood flow in CAD between medically and endovascularly treated patients using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography (QMRA). Methods: Retrospective chart review was completed for patients with CAD. Inclusion criteria were adults (>18 years) with diagnosis of dissection of the internal carotid artery or vertebral artery who received QMRA. The cases were reviewed for clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and imaging, and in particular, patients who underwent endovascular treatment were evaluated. Results: Forty-one patients were included, 46.3% female and mean age 46.0+/− 11.9 years. 21 patients (51.2%) had contralateral (ICA) dissections while 19 (46.3%) had vertebral artery (VA) dissections, and 1 had both involved. Five patients underwent stenting, angioplasty, or both. Baseline characteristics between patients who underwent medical versus endovascular treatment were similar, although patients undergoing stenting/angioplasty were more likely to have diabetes (p = 0.015) and prior anticoagulation use (p = 0.007). All endovascular patients demonstrated ischemia on MRI versus 53.1% of those undergoing medical management (p = 0.047). Comparing ipsilateral vessel flow over time in these two patient groups showed those who underwent stenting or angioplasty had lower baseline flows, albeit non-significant (p = 0.629). Patients who underwent endovascular treatment had lower distal flow compared to the medical management group. Conclusion: This study represents the first to assess vessel flow using QMRA in patients who underwent endovascular treatment of CAD. In combination with progressive symptoms, QMRA may serve as a useful adjunct in the selection of patients for endovascular intervention in arterial dissections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background SEGA is a rare, slow-growing CNS neoplasm that has historically been treated by surgical resection. However, the advent of a mammalian target of rapamycin complex-1 inhibitor, everolimus, has shown promising results in recent clinical trials. We sought to provide an analysis of epidemiological and survival risk factors in this rare tumor entity, while comparing trends in surgical management before and after introduction of everolimus in SEGAs. Methods Patients with SEGA were queried from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015. Standard statistical analysis was conducted to assess variables associated with the odds of performing surgery and survival, while controlling for confounding variables. Results A total of 460 patients were diagnosed with SEGA. Multivariable analysis of survival demonstrated that increased age was associated with decreased survival (HR, 1.05; P  < .0001). Multivariable analysis of surgery showed increased age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02, P  = .04) and tumor size 20 mm or larger (OR, 9.52-16.75, P  < .0001 for all) to be associated with higher odds of performing surgery. The use of radiotherapy (OR, 0.12, P  = .008) or chemotherapy (OR, 0.21, P  = .008) was associated with lower odds of surgery. A comparison of surgical rates between 2004 and 2010 and 2011 and 2015 was found to be significantly different, with a lower rate of surgery seen after 2011 (60.63% vs 48.06%, P  = .007). Conclusion Our analysis of SEGAs demonstrated that age was the only variable affecting overall survival. Surgical resection was performed in older patients with larger tumors (> 20 mm) as a primary mode of treatment, without chemoradiotherapy. Expectedly, rates of surgical resection were found to have decreased since 2011, after FDA approval of everolimus for SEGA treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]