Search

Background:. This study aims to fill the gap in large-scale, registry-based assessments by examining postoperative outcomes across diverse races/ethnicities. The focus is on identifying disparities and comparing them with socioeconomic demographics. Methods:. In a registry-based cohort study using the 2008 to 2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we evaluated 24 postoperative outcomes through multivariable analysis, incorporating 28 preoperative risk factors. In a separate, independent analysis of the 2019 to 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) database, we examined sociodemographic racial/ethnic normative data. Results:. Among 7,504,734 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Improvement Database patients specifying race, 83.8% were White (WT), 11.8% Black or African American (B/AA), 3.3% Asian (AS), 0.7% American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN), 0.4% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (NH/PI), 7.3% Hispanic. Reoperation trends reveal favorable outcomes for WT, AS, and NH/PI patients compared with B/AA and AI/AN patients. AI/AN patients exhibit higher rates of wound healing issues, while AS patients experience lower rates. AS and B/AA patients are more prone to transfusions, with B/AA patients showing elevated rates of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, renal failure, and insufficiency. Disparities in discharge destinations exist. Hispanic patients fare better than non-WT Hispanic patients, contingent on race. Racial groups (excluding Hispanic patients) with superior surgical outcomes from the NSQIP analysis were found in the NHIS analysis to report higher wealth, better healthcare access, improved food security, greater functional and societal independence, and lower frailty. Conclusions:. Our study underscores racial disparities in surgical outcomes. Focused investigations into these complications could reveal underlying causes, informing healthcare policies to enhance surgical care universally.

Objective: To determine if the various three-dimensional structures of bioscaffolds affect wound healing by investigating the efficacy of different porcine-derived urinary bladder matrix (UBM) structures in treating murine diabetic wound healing., Methods: The authors studied three different UBM structures: particulate (pUBM), one-layer freeze-dried sheet (fdUBM), and three-layer laminated sheet (lmUBM). Scanning electron microscopy images of the structures were used to calculate a wound-exposed surface-area-to-volume ratio. A 1.0 × 1.0-cm full-thickness dorsal wound was excised on 90 db/db mice. Mice were either untreated (blank, n = 15), treated with one UBM structure (pUBM, n = 15; fdUBM, n = 15; lmUBM, n = 15), or treated with a combination of either the one- or three-layer sheet over the particulate matrix (fdUBM + pUBM, n = 15; lmUBM + pUBM, n = 15). The authors obtained macroscopic images of the wounds and harvested tissues for analyses at multiple time points., Results: The surface area available to interact with the wound was highest in the pUBM group and lowest in the lmUBM group. Greater wound bed thickness was noted in the fdUBM, fdUBM + pUBM, and lmUBM groups compared with the blank group. Cellular proliferation was significantly higher in the fdUBM and fdUBM + pUBM groups than in the blank group. The lmUBM + pUBM group had the highest collagen deposition. The pUBM group induced significantly higher leukocyte infiltration compared with the lmUBM, lmUBM + pUBM, and blank groups. Microvessel density was highest in the fdUBM + pUBM group. Significant differences in the wound closure rate were noted between the blank group and the fdUBM and fdUBM + pUBM groups., Conclusions: Assessment of the three UBM bioscaffold structures highlighted differences in the wound-exposed surface area. Variations in wound healing effects, including collagen deposition, cellular proliferation, and angiogenesis, were identified, with combinations of the structures displaying synergistic effects. This study serves as a platform for future scaffold design and offers promising evidence of the benefits of combining various structures of scaffolds., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)