Search

Background Although cisplatin and 5-chloro-2,4-dihydropyrimidine (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor contained in S-1) are excreted into the urine, it remains unknown how creatinine clearance (CrCl) affects the safety and efficacy of cisplatin plus S-1 and docetaxel plus cisplatin plus S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods Among the 741 participants in JCOG1013 comparing cisplatin plus S-1 with docetaxel plus cisplatin plus S-1, 723 with serum creatinine levels ≤1.2 mg/dL were categorized into A1 (CrCl ≥ 80 mL/min), A2 (60 ≤ CrCl Results The numbers of patients categorized as A1/A2/A3 and B1/B2/B3 were 169/136/57 and 170/138/53, respectively. In the cisplatin plus S-1 arm, a lower CrCl was associated with higher incidences of grade 4 leukopenia (P = 0.006), neutropenia (P = 0.002), and grade 3/4 anorexia (P = 0.004) and febrile neutropenia (P = 0.049), whereas there was no association in the docetaxel plus cisplatin plus S-1 arm. No significant differences were observed according to CrCl in the overall survival [median: 15.4/15.5/15.4 months in A1/A2/A3 (P = 0.886) and 15.3/13.7/13.7 months in B1/B2/B3 (P = 0.719)], progression-free survival [median: 7.1/6.8/6.2 months in A1/A2/A3 (P = 0.884) and 7.5/7.2/7.8 months in B1/B2/B3 (P = 0.851)] and response rates [58.9/57.8/46.9% in A1/A2/A3 (P = 0.311) and 62.0/61.5/51.5% in B1/B2/B3 (P = 0.362)]. Conclusions Renal impairment was associated with severe adverse events in cisplatin plus S-1 therapy but not with the efficacy in cisplatin plus S-1 and docetaxel plus cisplatin plus S-1 therapy.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker and a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor. The drug's efficacy has been proven in HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. The rate of HER2 positivity in biliary tract cancer (BTC) has been reported to be 5-20%, and case reports and clinical trials have suggested that HER2 inhibitors might be active in HER2-positive BTC. Here we describe the rationale and design of the phase II HERB trial that will evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-expressing unresectable or recurrent BTC. The primary end point will be the centrally assessed objective response rate in HER2-positive patients.Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) is a new drug against HER2, a receptor on cell membranes that has sensitivity to targeted inhibitors. The drug’s efficacy has been proven in HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. Some studies have suggested that HER2 inhibitors might be active in HER2-positive biliary tract cancers. This article describes the design of a new clinical trial. The HERB trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-expressing biliary tract cancers. Clinical trial registration: JMA-IIA00423.

Whether pT3 urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis (UCRP) and urothelial carcinoma of the ureter (UCU) have the same prognosis is controversial, this study compared the prognosis of pT3 UCRP with that of pT3 UCU. We retrospectively evaluated 954 patients who underwent nephroureterectomy at our institutions between January 1983 and December 2017. All surgical specimens were reviewed by a single genitourinary pathologist. Cases of pT3 UCRP were subclassified as pT3a (urothelial carcinomas extending only to the renal medulla) and pT3b (urothelial carcinomas extending into the renal cortex and/or peripelvic adipose tissue). Fine and Gray's model was used to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). A total of 493 (51.7%) had UCRP and 461 (48.3%) had UCU. Within this group, 202 patients had pT3 UCRP and 146 had pT3 UCU. The pT3 subclassification of UCRP resulted in 79 cases of pT3a and 120 of pT3b. The difference in 5-year CSS among the pT3a UCRP, pT2 UCRP, and pT2 UCU subgroups was not statistically significant (pT3a UCRP vs pT2 UCRP, HR = 0.69, p = 0.56; pT3a UCRP vs pT2 UCU, HR = 0.66, p = 0.31) However, RFS and CSS were significantly higher in the pT3a UCRP group than in the pT3b group (pT3a vs pT3b, HR = 2.59, p = 0.0038 and pT3a vs pT3b, HR = 3.10, p = 0.001). The results suggest that our proposed pT3 subclassification better predicts the prognosis of UCRP patients than does the pT3 of the current AJCC/UICC classification.

To estimate whether antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) improve short- and long-term preterm offspring outcomes in singleton pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) similar to pregnancies without HDP. This population-based retrospective study was conducted based on an analysis of data collected by the Neonatal Research Network of Japan on 21,014 singleton neonates weighing ≤1,500 g between 24 and 31 weeks’ gestation during 2003–2016. Logistic regression analyses were performed to compare short- and long-term offspring outcomes between mothers receiving ACS treatment and those who did not among pregnancies with HDP and without HDP. Of 21,014 neonates, 4,806 (22.9%) were born to mothers with HDP. ACS treatment was associated with significant decreases in short-term adverse outcomes in the both HDP and non-HDP groups, with similar reduced odds of neonatal death, respiratory distress syndrome, and intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH). However, ACS treatment did not significantly decrease severe IVH (aOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.51–1.13) and periventricular leukomalacia (1.14; 0.78–1.66) in the HDP group. In addition, ACS treatment in mothers without HDP significantly decreased cerebral palsy (aOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.58–084), developmental quotient scores

Objective To estimate whether improvement in outcomes from antenatal corticosteroid treatment in extremely and very preterm twins is similar to that observed in singletons, and to investigate whether antenatal corticosteroid treatment has different effects according to chorionicity or birth order. Methods This population-based study was based on an analysis of data collected by the Neonatal Research Network of Japan from 2003 to 2015 of neonates weighing 1,500 g or less at birth, from gestational ages of 24 0/7 to 31 6/7 weeks of gestation. After propensity score matching, univariate logistic and interaction analyses were performed to compare short-term (neonatal period) and medium-term (3 years of age) outcomes of the children of mothers who received antenatal corticosteroids with those of children of mothers who did not receive antenatal corticosteroids. We focused on differences between singletons and twins, between monochorionic and dichorionic twins and between the first and second twin. Results The study comprised 23,502 singletons and 6,546 twins. Antenatal corticosteroid treatment was associated with significant decreased short-term neurologic outcomes in both singletons and twins. However, antenatal corticosteroid treatment was associated with significantly decreased mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.61; 95% CI 0.53-0.70), respiratory distress syndrome (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.76), and cerebral palsy (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72-0.99) in singletons but not in twins (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68-1.17; OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.12; and OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61-1.11, respectively). No association was found between chorionicity and the efficacy of antenatal corticosteroid treatment on outcomes. Further, no association was found between birth order and the efficacy of antenatal corticosteroid treatment on outcomes, except for periventricular leukomalacia and necrotizing enterocolitis (interaction: P=.02 and P=.04, respectively). Conclusion Antenatal corticosteroid treatment in twins was associated with a beneficial effect on short-term neurologic outcomes only, without improvement in other short-term and medium-term outcomes. There was no difference related to chorionicity.

197 Background: The prognostic relevance of primary tumor sidedness (PTS) in early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) is still debated. Several epidemiologic studies have yielded different results due to the wide variation in the quality of CRC surgery and perioperative management. This integrated analysis aimed to investigate the true prognostic relevance of PTS in stage II/III CRC among patients who received standardized surgery and perioperative management. Methods: This analysis included patients from 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG): JCOG0205, JCOG0404, JCOG0910, and JCOG1006. All patients enrolled in these RCTs received standardized surgery with Japanese D2/D3 lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant 5-FU monotherapy was planned for all stage III patients as a protocol treatment. The data were collated, and patients with stage II/III adenocarcinoma of the colon and upper rectum were identified. For comparison, all eligible patients were categorized into a right-sided (cecum to transverse colon) group or a left-sided (descending colon to upper rectum) group. Primary outcome measures were relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after primary surgery, and secondary outcome measures included OS after recurrence. Results: A total of 4,113 patients from the 4 RCTs satisfied the eligibility criteria and were divided into two groups; 1,349 right-sided and 2,764 left-sided CRC patients. Five-year RFS after primary surgery for right-sided and left-sided CRC was 79.7% and 79.9% in all patients, 89.7% and 86.9% in stage II and 77.0% and 78.3% in stage III, respectively. There was no significant difference in RFS after adjustment for patient and treatment characteristics (HRadjusted 1.024 [95% CI 0.886-1.183] in all patients, 1.327 [0.852-2.067] in stage II and 0.990 [0.850-1.154] in stage III). Five-year OS after primary surgery was 89.7% and 91.7% in all patients, 97.2% and 96.0% in stage II and 87.6% and 90.7% in stage III, respectively. There was also no remarkable difference in OS after adjustment (HRadjusted 0.879 [95% CI 0.726-1.064] in all patients, 1.517 [0.738-3.115] in stage II and 0.840 [0.689-1.024] in stage III). In total, 795 patients, including 257 right-sided and 538 left-sided CRC, had any recurrence after primary surgery. Five-year OS after a recurrence of right-sided and left-sided CRC were 39.8% and 49.8%, respectively. After adjustment, right-sided CRC had significantly worse OS after recurrence (HRadjusted 0.773 [95% CI 0.627-0.954]). Conclusions: Our results provide more robust evidence for no impact of PTS on recurrence risk and survival after standard surgery and perioperative management for stage II/III CRC. These results indicate that treatment stratification based on PTS is not necessary in early-stage CRC.

2036 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the worst prognostic cancers and there is no effective treatment after failure of bevacizumab. Eribulin is a microtubule inhibitor used for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer and liposarcoma. We previously reported that eribulin strongly inhibits the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) activity of TERT protein in cancer cells, and has a strong anti-tumor effect against GBM cells with TERT promoter mutation. In this study we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of eribulin in patients with bevacizumab-resistant recurrent GBM. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial. Eligible patients aged 20-75 years with bevacizumab-resistant recurrent GBM were enrolled from 2018-2020. Patients received eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicity was observed. The primary endpoint was one-year overall survival rate (1yOS%). The 35 patients are needed to achieve an 80% power at a one-sided alpha of 10%, under threshold 1yOS% of 10% and expected 1yOS% of 25%. Results: Thirty-seven patients aged 26-73 (median: 54) years were treated. Twenty-six of 37 (70.3%) patients were diagnosed as IDH-wildtype GBM, 4 (10.8%) were with IDH-mutant GBM and 7 (18.9%) were GBM, NOS. Thirty-four (91.9%) patients had a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or 80 at the registration. Thirty-one (83.8%) patients received additional treatments, including 28 (75.7%) bevacizumab, 11 (29.7%) re-irradiation and 3 (8.1%) resection after failure of eribulin. Among 37 subjects, 32 surgical specimens were analyzed for TERT promoter mutation and 15 for RdRP activity. 1yOS% was 29.7% [80% CI: 20.5 to 39.5 (p < 0.0001), 95% CI: 16.1 to 44.6]. Median OS was 9.0 months [95% CI: 6.2 to 11.0] and median progression-free survival was 1.5 months [95% CI: 1.4 to 1.7]. Neither TERT nor RdRP statuses was associated with prolonged OS. Among all the target lesions evaluated, two lesions decreased more than 50% in size and the patients survived more than one year, however no obvious PR was confirmed at the final evaluation. The disease control rate was 25.7% [95% CI: 12.5 to 43.3]. Common ≥ grade 2 AEs were neutropenia (70.3%), leukopenia (56.8%), lymphopenia (27.0%), elevation of γ-GTP (13.5%), elevation of ALT (10.8%), elevation of AST (8.1%), alopecia (8.1%). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 59.5% of subjects. There were no AEs leading to death. Conclusions: Eribulin was safely applied for the patients with recurrent GBM. This phase II study met its primary endpoint of 1yOS%, although no obvious response was observed. Further investigation to reveal the biomarkers related to longer survival is underway. Clinical trial information: UMIN000030359.

4006 Background: BTCs have an aggressive tumor biology with limited treatment options. With a HER2-positivity rate of 5–20% in BTCs, case series and small clinical trials have shown signs of activity for HER2 blockade in these pts. T-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor. The HERB trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-arm phase 2 trial of T-DXd in pts with HER2-expressing BTCs. Methods: Centrally confirmed HER2-expressing (HER2-positive: IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+, and HER2-low-expressing [HER2-low]: IHC/ISH status of 0/+, 1+/-, 1+/+, or 2+/-) pts with BTCs who were refractory or intolerant to gemcitabine containing regimen received 5.4 mg/kg of T-DXd every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in HER2-positive pts by independent central review. The sample size of 22 had 80% power with one-sided alpha error of 5%; threshold ORR, 15%; and expected ORR, 40%. The ORR, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) in HER2-positive/-low pts, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed as secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 32 pts, 24 with HER2-positive and 8 with HER2-low BTCs, received T-DXd. Twenty-two pts with HER2-positive, excluding 2 ineligible pts, were identified for primary efficacy analysis. Among the 22 pts, IHC3+ and IHC2+/ISH+ were 45.5% and 54.5%, primary sites: gallbladder/extrahepatic/intrahepatic/Vater were 11/6/3/2, median number of prior regimens was 2 (range, 1–4). The confirmed ORR in HER2-positive pts was 36.4% (8/22; 2 CR and 6 PR; 90% CI, 19.6–56.1), indicating statistically significant improvement in ORR (P = 0.01). The DCR, median (m) PFS, mOS were 81.8% (95% CI, 59.7–94.8), 4.4 months (mo) (95% CI, 2.8–8.3), 7.1 mo (95% CI, 4.7–14.6), respectively. In addition, encouraging efficacy were seen even in HER2-low pts; ORR, DCR, mPFS, and mOS were 12.5% (1/8; 1 PR; 95% CI, 0.3–52.7), 75.0% (95% CI, 34.9–96.8), 4.2 mo (95% CI, 1.3–6.2), and 8.9 mo (95% CI, 3.0–12.8), respectively. In the safety analysis set (n = 32), TEAEs of > = grade (G) 3 occurred in 81.3% (26/32); the common TEAEs were anemia (53.1%), neutropenia (31.3%), and leukopenia (31.3%). TEAEs leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 8 pts (25.0%). Eight pts (25.0%) had interstitial lung disease (ILD; G1/G2/G3/G5 were 3/1/2/2) not adjudicated by an independent committee. Conclusions: T-DXd showed promising activity in pts with HER2-expressing BTCs. Although the safety profile was generally consistent with other T-DXd studies, ILD, an important identified risk of T-DXd, requires more careful monitoring and intervention. These results support further exploration of T-DXd in this patient population. Clinical trial information: JMA-IIA00423.

TPS10059 Background: Enhancer of zeste homolog enzymes (EZH1 and EZH2) form parts of the polycomb repressive complex 2 and regulate gene expression by catalyzing the tri-methylation of lysine 27 residue of histone H3. SMARCB1/INI1 is one of the core components of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, with the loss of SMARCB1/INI1 causing the oncogenic activation of EZH2 and EZH1. The inhibition of EZH2 or both EZH2 and EZH1 can be effective against various hematological malignancies and SMARCB1/INI1-deficient solid tumors. Valemetostat tosylate (DS-3201b; valemetostat) is a potential first-in-class dual inhibitor of EZH1 and EZH2 that targets epigenetic regulations by inhibiting both EZH1 and EZH2 enzymes. A phase 2 single-arm study showed that valemetostat demonstrated promising response rates in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (Yoshimitsu M et al., presented at ASH Annual Meeting, 2021). Tumors characterized by SMARCB1/INI1 deficiency (a SWI/SNF mutation), such as malignant rhabdoid tumors, epithelioid sarcoma, or synovial sarcoma are quite frequently observed during childhood and adolescence, among whom valemetostat is expected to show antitumor effects. Methods: This open-label multi-center phase I trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of valemetostat in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with refractory/relapsed solid tumors. The inclusion criteria are relapsed, refractory, or progressive metastatic disease; >3 and 50 (assessed by Karnofsky Performance score in patients >16 years old, and Lansky Performance score in patients 2) are assessed using a 3+3 design during the dose escalation cohort. After determining the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) during dose escalation cohort, up to 30 patients will be further enrolled, and the safety and efficacy data of valemetostat are determined in the expanded cohort. The primary endpoint is the incidence of dose limiting toxicity, whereas the secondary endpoints include safety, pharmacokinetics, overall response rate, progression-free survival. The overall response rate of the tumors with SMARCB1/INI1 deficiency or SWI/SNF mutation is also evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Exploratory endpoint includes overall survival. Enrollment into this trial began in March 2020, and enrollment into the dose escalation cohort was completed. Enrollment into the expanded cohort began in November 2021. Clinical Trial Information: jRCT2031190268.

Aging of the population has led to an increase in the prevalence of cancer among older adults. In Japan, single agent chemotherapy was recommended for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for those, who were aged ≥75 years, while the Western guidelines did not recommend a specific regimen. In clinical practice, physicians are required to decide the treatment based on a lack of enough evidence. This study aimed to examine the prescribing patterns of first-line chemotherapy according to age in the real-world practice. Data from the survey database of Diagnostic Procedure Combination and hospital-based cancer registries of designated cancer centers nationwide were used. The first-line chemotherapy regimens among 9,737 patients who were diagnosed with advanced lung cancer between January and December 2013, were identified and compared based on age. We found that the proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy decreased with age; 80.0%, 70.4%, 50.6%, and 30.2% of patients aged 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, and ≥ 85 years, respectively, received chemotherapy. Among them, platinum doublets were prescribed for 62.7% of the patients who were aged ≥ 70 years, and 60.7% of the patients who were aged ≥ 75 years with no driver mutations in NSCLC; only 37.6% of them received single agents. Patients who were aged ≥ 80 years also preferred platinum doublets (35.6%). Carboplatin was commonly prescribed in all age groups; only 28.4% of those receiving platinum doublets selected cisplatin. In this study, platinum doublets were identified as the most commonly prescribed regimen in those who were aged ≥ 70 years. Despite recommendations of Japanese guidelines for NSCLC, 60.7% of those who were aged ≥75 years received platinum doublets. Additionally, patients who were aged ≥ 80 years also received systemic chemotherapy, including platinum doublets; age did not solely influence regimen selection.

e16035 Background: A phase III study, JCOG1013, did not show the superiority of docetaxel plus cisplatin plus S-1 (DCS) to cisplatin plus S-1 (CS) in overall survival (OS) (Yamada Y, Lancet GH 2019). It is known that cisplatin and gimeracil (an inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase contained in S-1) are excreted in urine. We previously reported (abstr 197, ASCO-GI 2021) exploratory analysis of JCOG1013 which showed creatinine clearance (CrCl) was associated with safety (Grade [G]4 hematological toxicity for CS, and G3-4 non-hematological toxicity for CS and DCS), but not with efficacy in either group. Here, we report the additional detail results of this exploratory analysis. Methods: Among 741 participants in JCOG1013, patients with serum creatinine level < 1.2 mg/dL were included in this analysis and categorized by CrCl and treatment into A1 (CrCl ≥ 80 mL/min, CS), A2 (60 < CrCl < 80, CS), A3 (CrCl < 60, CS), B1 (CrCl > 80, DCS), B2 (60 < CrCl < 80, DCS), and B3 (CrCl < 60, DCS). The dose (mg/m2) of C/S was 60/80 regardless renal function in group A (A1, A2 and A3), and that of D/C/S was adjusted in group B as follows: 40/60/80 in B1, 40/50/80 in B2, and 40/40/65 in B3. Adverse events, OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared by CrCl in group A (A1 vs. A2 vs. A3) and group B (B1 vs B2 vs B3), respectively. Results: Of 723 pts (169/136/57 in A1/A2/A3 and 170/138/53 in B1/B2/B3), the median CrCl (mL/min) was 94.1/71.9/53.4 in A1/A2/A3 and 98.2/70.0/55.6 in B1/B2/B3. The relative dose intensity of C/S was 90.4/75.3%, 87.8/74.9% and 85.7/72.8% in A1, A2 and A3, and that of D/C/S was 87.5/77.7/74.9%, 85.8/61.2/72.7% and 87.8/49.4/58.3% in B1, B2 and B3. The incidence of G4 white blood cell decreased, G4 neutrophil count decreased, and G3-4 anorexia were 1.2/4.4/9.3% (P < 0.01), 4.8/11.1/18.5% (P < 0.01), 14.4/28.1/28.6% (P < 0.01) in A1/A2/A3, and 1.8/3.0/4.0% (P = 0.36), 27.3/24.8/20.0% (P = 0.28), 22.4/29.3/32.0% (P = 0.11) in B1/B2/B3, respectively. No significant association between CrCl and other adverse events was observed either in CS or in DCS group. The median OS was 15.4/15.5/15.4 months in A1/A2/A3 (P = 0.89) and 15.3/13.7/13.7 months in B1/B2/B3 (P = 0.72). The median PFS was comparable among A1/A2/A3 (7.1/6.8/6.2 months, P = 0.88) and B1/B2/B3 groups (7.5/7.2/7.8 months, P = 0.85). ORR showed no significant difference in A1/A2/A3 (58.9/57.8/46.9%, P = 0.31) and B1/B2/B3 groups (62.0/61.5/51.5%, P = 0.36). Conclusions: Dose modification according to renal function in the DCS arm could control the increase of severe toxicities, which were observed frequently in patients with low renal function in patients receiving fixed dose of CS. Clinical trial information: 000007652.

197 Background: JCOG1013, a phase III study comparing CS therapy with DCS therapy for AGC, failed to demonstrate the superiority of DCS to CS in overall survival (OS) (Yamada Y, Lancet GH 2019). Because cisplatin and gimeracil (an inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase contained in S-1) are excreted in urine, it is speculated that renal dysfunction may affect the safety and efficacy of CS and DCS in patients (pts) with AGC. Methods: Among 741 all randomized pts, pts with serum creatinine level < 1.2 mg/dL were included in this study. Pts were categorized by creatinine clearance (CrCl) and treatment into A1 (CrCl ≥ 80 mL/min, CS), A2 (60 < CrCl < 80, CS), A3 (CrCl < 60, CS), B1 (CrCl ≥ 80, DCS), B2 (60 < CrCl < 80, DCS), and B3 (CrCl < 60, DCS). Adverse events, OS, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) were compared by CrCl in group A (A1 vs. A2 vs. A3) and group B (B1 vs B2 vs B3), respectively, and between the treatment groups according to CrCl (A1 vs. B1, A2 vs. B2, A3 vs. B3). Results: Of 723 pts (169/136/57 in A1/A2/A3 and 170/138/53 in B1/B2/B3), the median CrCl was 94.1/71.9/53.4 mL/min in A1/A2/A3 and 98.2/70.0/55.6 mL/min in B1/B2/B3 group. The incidence of Grade (G) 4 hematological toxicity was 7.8/16.3/25.9% in A1/A2/A3 (P < 0.01), and 29.1/29.3/22.0% in B1/B2/B3 (P = 0.44), and that of G3-4 non-hematological toxicity was 46.1/64.4/64.3% in A1/A2/A3 (P < 0.01) and 54.6/64.7/74.5% in B1/B2/B3 (P < 0.01), respectively. The median OS was 15.4/15.5/15.4 months in A1/A2/A3 (P = 0.89) and 15.3/13.7/13.7 months in B1/B2/B3 (P = 0.72). The median PFS was comparable in A1/A2/A3 (7.1/6.8/6.2 months, P = 0.88) and B1/B2/B3 groups (7.5/7.2/7.8 months, P = 0.85). ORR showed no significant difference in A1/A2/A3 (58.9/57.8/46.9%, P = 0.31) and B1/B2/B3 groups (62.0/61.5/51.5%, P = 0.36). Comparisons between treatment arms according to CrCl (A1 vs. B1, A2 vs. B2, A3 vs. B3) did not show any significant difference in OS (P = 0.88, 0.65, 0.83) and PFS (P = 0.91, 0.63, 0.46). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis of JCOG1013, CrCl might be associated with safety (G4 hematological toxicity for CS, and G3-4 non-hematological toxicity for CS and DCS), but not with efficacy in either group. Clinical trial information: 000007652.

301 Background: JCOG1113 is a randomized phase III trial to confirm the non-inferiority of gemcitabine (GEM) plus S-1 (GS) compared with GEM plus cisplatin (GC) regarding overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Although the non-inferiority of GS to GC was demonstrated, the difference in the nature of tumor shrinkage effects between GC and GS is not clear. Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) are considered as on-treatment markers that reflect the anti-tumor effect to chemotherapy and have been reported to be associated with survival in metastatic colorectal cancer. However, there are few studies assessing ETS or DpR in advanced BTC. Therefore, we evaluated the association between ETS, DpR, and clinical outcomes in JCOG1113. Methods: We conducted an exploratory analysis of JCOG1113, which included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC. ETS was defined as tumor reduction in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions at week 6 when compared with that at baseline. DpR was defined as the maximum tumor shrinkage observed until 12 weeks from enrollment. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for ETS and DpR were estimated from week 6 and 12 (landmarks) after enrollment, respectively. Multivariable analyses for PFS and OS, adjusted for baseline factors, were performed using a stratified Cox regression model. Results: Of the 354 registered patients in JCOG1113, 277 patients in the ETS group and 230 patients in the DpR group were included in this study. Seventy-seven patients (27.8%) achieved ETS ≥ 20% (ETS high group) and 52 patients (22.6%) achieved DpR ≥ 40% (DpR high group). The proportion of ETS high group (GC, 25.4%; GS, 30.4%) and DpR high group (GC, 21.2%; GS, 24.1%) was similar between the arms. The patient characteristics of ETS high group were not different between GC and GS. The hazard ratio (HR) of the ETS high group compared with the ETS low group for PFS and OS was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–1.00) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.60–1.07), respectively. The impact of ETS was higher in GC (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43–0.95) than GS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.60–1.28) in PFS. The HR of DpR high group compared with DpR low group for PFS and OS was 0.75 (95% CI 0.55–1.03) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.57–1.09), respectively. The impact of DpR was higher in GC (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40–0.998) than GS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.57–1.37) in PFS. ETS and DpR were significantly associated with both PFS and OS in the multivariable analyses. Conclusions: ETS and DpR may be useful as on-treatment markers associated with PFS and OS in patients with advanced BTC, especially in those treated with GC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000010667.

Little is known about the toxicity of various therapeutics for cancer over time because randomized controlled clinical trials that compare several treatments are limited. In this study, we focused on the toxicities most frequently discussed, which are investigations (lab abnormalities), gastrointestinal disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and cardiac disorders, and compared their longitudinal toxicity data among four types of cancer therapeutics. In total, 28,235 patients who were enrolled into 772 early-phase trials to evaluate the monotherapies of cytotoxic drugs, molecularly targeted agents, immunomodulatory drugs, or cancer vaccines were evaluated. For each toxicity, we compared their grade prevalence, mean grade at each cycle, and time to toxicity occurrence and identified the potential underlying similarities and differences of longitudinal toxicities among the four cancer treatment types. Our results will further help in understanding the profile of cancer therapeutic toxicities and their impact on oncology treatment in practice.