Search

Establishing alternatives to lifelong chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer has been proposed to address chemotherapy resistance and cumulative toxicity. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown efficacy in this setting, and concurrent immune checkpoint blockade could offer synergistic tumour control. The aim of this study was to test the safety and antitumour activity of maintenance with PARP inhibition combined with immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had a stable response to platinum-based chemotherapy.We conducted an open-label, randomised, phase 1b/2 study of niraparib plus anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) or anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose cancer had not progressed after at least 16 weeks of platinum-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via permuted block randomisation (block sizes 2 and 4) to niraparib 200 mg orally per day plus either nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks (later changed to 480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks based on manufacturer update) or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks for four doses. The primary endpoints were safety and progression-free survival at 6 months. Treatment groups were not compared for activity, which was assessed in each group against a clinically meaningful progression-free survival at 6 months of 44% (null hypothesis). Superiority of a treatment regimen could be declared if 6-month progression-free survival was 60%, and inferiority if 6-month progression-free survival was 27%. All patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one post-treatment assessment of response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 were included in the efficacy population. The safety population consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03404960, and enrolment is completed and follow-up is ongoing.91 patients were enrolled between Feb 7, 2018, and Oct 5, 2021 and were randomly assigned to niraparib plus nivolumab (n=46) or niraparib plus ipilimumab (n=45). Of these patients, 84 were evaluable for the progression-free survival endpoint (niraparib plus nivolumab=44; niraparib plus ipilimumab=40). Median follow-up was 23·0 months (IQR 15·0-31·5). 6-month progression-free survival was 20·6% (95% CI 8·3-32·9; p=0·0002 vs the null hypothesis of 44%) in the niraparib plus nivolumab group; and 59·6% (44·3-74·9; p=0·045) in the niraparib plus ipilimumab group. Ten (22%) of 46 patients in the niraparib plus nivolumab group and 23 (50%) of 45 patients in the niraparib plus ipilimumab group had a grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse event. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the niraparib plus nivolumab group were hypertension (in four [8%] patients), anaemia (two [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (two [4%]) whereas in the niraparib plus ipilimumab group these were fatigue (in six [14%]), anaemia (five [11%]), and hypertension (four [9%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.The primary endpoint of 6-month progression-free survival was met in the niraparib plus ipilimumab maintenance group, whereas niraparib plus nivolumab yielded inferior progression-free survival. These findings highlight the potential for non-cytotoxic maintenance therapies in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, the Basser Center Young Leadership Council, The Konner Foundation, The Pearl and Philip Basser Innovation Research Award, the Anonymous Foundation, and the US National Institutes of Health.

Patients with cancer have high mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the immune parameters that dictate clinical outcomes remain unknown. In a cohort of 100 patients with cancer who were hospitalized for COVID-19, patients with hematologic cancer had higher mortality relative to patients with solid cancer. In two additional cohorts, flow cytometric and serologic analyses demonstrated that patients with solid cancer and patients without cancer had a similar immune phenotype during acute COVID-19, whereas patients with hematologic cancer had impairment of B cells and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific antibody responses. Despite the impaired humoral immunity and high mortality in patients with hematologic cancer who also have COVID-19, those with a greater number of CD8 T cells had improved survival, including those treated with anti-CD20 therapy. Furthermore, 77% of patients with hematologic cancer had detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses. Thus, CD8 T cells might influence recovery from COVID-19 when humoral immunity is deficient. These observations suggest that CD8 T cell responses to vaccination might provide protection in patients with hematologic cancer even in the setting of limited humoral responses.

e15580 Background: The antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib provides a survival benefit in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Antiangiogenic therapy causes hypoxic stress within tumor cells, which activate autophagy as a survival mechanism. Entinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, increases dependence on autophagy through epigenetic mechanisms. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blocks autophagy by blunting lysosomal acidification and is synergistic with antiangiogenic therapies. We hypothesized that HCQ and entinostat would be tolerable with regorafenib and potentiate the antitumor response. Methods: This was a 3+3 phase I trial to find the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of HCQ and entinostat with regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. No prior regorafenib or HDAC inhibitor therapy was permitted. Regorafenib was dosed at 160mg daily on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles, with provision to lower the starting dose to 80mg if toxicity was excessive. Entinostat was dosed at 3mg weekly in dose level 1 and at 5mg weekly in dose levels 2 and 3 while HCQ was dosed at 200mg qAM and 400mg qPM in dose levels 1 and 2 and at 600mg BID at dose level 3. Expansion was planned at the RP2D with a primary endpoint of objective response rate. Results: Twenty-eight patients were screened, and 20 patients were enrolled from November 2017 to January 2020. Six patients were treated at dose level 1 with no dose-limiting toxicity. The starting regorafenib dose was reduced to 80mg after 3 patients discontinued therapy early due to fatigue or rash due to regorafenib. At dose level 2, 7 patients were enrolled to achieve 6 evaluable patients. One DLT (G3 fatigue) was noted and one patient withdrew consent after 14 days due to fever and tumor pain flare possibly related to treatment. Six patients enrolled at dose level 3; no DLTs were seen. One additional patient received HCQ 400mg BID instead of 600mg BID due to a clerical error. Weight loss (60%), fatigue (50%), and anorexia (50%) were the most common toxicities. Thirteen grade 3 toxicities were noted, with rash (15%), fatigue (10%), and alkaline phosphatase elevation (10%) the most common. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Seven patients discontinued therapy early due to toxicity. Nearly all patients experienced rapid weight loss, with a range of 1.5 lbs to 27.1 lbs and a median weight loss of 9.5 lbs at two weeks. No objective responses were observed. The median PFS was 1.8 months, the median OS was 5.2 months, and no patient remained on study longer than 4 months. Expansion was not pursued due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. Conclusions: The combination of regorafenib, HCQ, and entinostat was poorly tolerated without evident activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. The substantial weight loss suggests a potential adverse metabolic interaction between these drugs. Clinical trial information: NCT03215264.

The etiology of anemia in adults is often multifactorial. This case highlights an uncommon combination of causes of anemia and the importance of a diagnostic workup guided by a patient's unique history, risk factors, and laboratory findings.

Cancer patients have increased morbidity and mortality from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the underlying immune mechanisms are unknown. In a cohort of 100 cancer patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at the University of Pennsylvania Health System, we found that patients with hematologic cancers had a significantly higher mortality relative to patients with solid cancers after accounting for confounders including ECOG performance status and active cancer status. We performed flow cytometric and serologic analyses of 106 cancer patients and 113 non-cancer controls from two additional cohorts at Penn and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Patients with solid cancers exhibited an immune phenotype similar to non-cancer patients during acute COVID-19 whereas patients with hematologic cancers had significant impairment of B cells and SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses. High dimensional analysis of flow cytometric data revealed 5 distinct immune phenotypes. An immune phenotype characterized by CD8 T cell depletion was associated with a high viral load and the highest mortality of 71%, among all cancer patients. In contrast, despite impaired B cell responses, patients with hematologic cancers and preserved CD8 T cells had a lower viral load and mortality. These data highlight the importance of CD8 T cells in acute COVID-19, particularly in the setting of impaired humoral immunity. Further, depletion of B cells with anti-CD20 therapy resulted in almost complete abrogation of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgM antibodies, but was not associated with increased mortality compared to other hematologic cancers, when adequate CD8 T cells were present. Finally, higher CD8 T cell counts were associated with improved overall survival in patients with hematologic cancers. Thus, CD8 T cells likely compensate for deficient humoral immunity and influence clinical recovery of COVID-19. These observations have important implications for cancer and COVID-19-directed treatments, immunosuppressive therapies, and for understanding the role of B and T cells in acute COVID-19.

Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are among the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide. Despite the introduction of targeted and immunotherapy agents in the treatment landscape, cytotoxic agents, such as fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan, remain as the cornerstone of chemotherapy for many of these tumors. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) is a rapidly evolving field that accounts for interpatient variability in drug metabolism to predict therapeutic response and toxicity. Given the significant incidence of severe treatment-related adverse events associated with cytotoxic agents, utilizing PGx can allow clinicians to better anticipate drug tolerability while minimizing treatment interruptions or delays. In this review, the PGx profiles of drug-gene pairs with potential impact in GI malignancy therapy - DPYD-5-fluorouracil/capecitabine and UGT1A1-irinotecan - and the available clinical evidence of their roles in reducing severe adverse events are discussed. Considerations for clinical implementation, such as optimal laboratory workflows, electronic health record integration, and stakeholder engagement, as well as provider education, are addressed. Last, exploratory PGx markers in GI malignancy treatment are described. As the PGx knowledge base rapidly evolves, pharmacists will be vital in leveraging their pharmacology knowledge and clinical skills to implement PGx testing in the clinic.

IMPACT: The implementation of DPYD and UGT1A1 pharmacogenetic testing, a promising tool of precision medicine, translates evidence-based research into clinical oncology practice with personalized dosing to better predict interpatient variability in chemotherapy tolerability. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Patients with DPYD and UGT1A1 genetic variants are at risk for severe toxicity from fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan, respectively. We propose that providing clinicians with the option to order a pharmacogenetic (PGx) test with relevant dose recommendations will increase test uptake to guide pharmacotherapy decisions and improve safety outcomes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We plan to conduct a non-randomized, pragmatic, open-label study in 600 adult patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers initiating a fluoropyrimidine- and/or irinotecan-based regimen at three cancer centers within a health system. Implementation metrics of a new, in-house laboratory developed PGx test will be measured, including feasibility of returning results within one week, fidelity of providers following dose recommendations, and penetrance via test ordering rates. Clinical aims will include assessing severe toxicity during the first six months of chemotherapy. Outcomes will be compared to a historical control of GI cancer patients enrolled in a biobank and treated with standard dose chemotherapy. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate that there will be an increase in PGx test uptake given its shorter turnaround time to facilitate clinical decision-making prior to the first dose of chemotherapy. Through integration of test results in the electronic health record (EHR) and clinical decision support tools for patients with actionable genotypes, we also expect that providers will have a high level of agreement to the recommended dose adjustments. We anticipate a decreased incidence of severe (Grade >3) toxicity among prospectively genotyped patients in the first six months of chemotherapy compared to DPYD and UGT1A1 variant carriers in the historical control group. Exploratory clinical utility data on costs of hospitalizations, chemotherapy treatment, PGx test, and medical services will also be reported. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: This study aims to address barriers identified by key stakeholders to implementing PGx testing to better tailor chemotherapy dosing to the genetic profiles to patients. This may prevent adverse event-related hospitalizations, improve quality of life for patients, and reduce health system resource utilization costs.

TPS10085 Background: Novel checkpoint inhibitors are a promising treatment for advanced melanoma, as only a fraction of patients have durable responses to current FDA-approved immunotherapy. Lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3) is an inhibitory checkpoint receptor on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, where engagement results in suppression of T cell activation and proliferation. LAG3 and PD1 are co-expressed on T cells during T cell receptor signaling and are down-regulated after antigen clearance. Persistent stimulation leads to prolonged LAG3 and PD1 expression and to T cell exhaustion, a possible mechanism of resistance to immunotherapy. Both LAG3 and PD1 are expressed on tumor-infiltrating T cells in melanoma. Murine tumors treated with both anti-LAG3 and anti-PD1 have demonstrated increased tumor regression than tumors in mice treated with either single agent. Further, a phase I trial has demonstrated safety of combined anti-LAG3 monoclonal antibody, relatlimab and anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody, nivolumab. Methods: This phase II, single-center clinical trial is designed to enroll treatment naive patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma to ultimately receive combined relatlimab and nivolumab after a lead-in arm where patients are randomized to receive relatlimab, nivolumab, or the combination for the first 4 week cycle. For the lead-in phase, patients will have baseline and post-treatment blood and tumor sampling. Disease assessment by imaging will occur after the lead-in phase at 4 weeks. After completion of the lead-in phase, all patients proceed to combination therapy with disease assessment at 12-week intervals. The primary endpoint for the lead-in phase is to evaluate changes in immune cell populations in peripheral blood and tumor with the single agents and combination treatment. The primary endpoint for the combination phase is best overall anti-tumor response. Secondary clinical endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response and toxicity. Exploratory endpoints are to determine the mechanistic effects of anti-LAG3 and anti-PD1 on the blood and tumor microenvironment, cytokine signatures, and correlation of these with clinical response. The study is currently accruing with enrollment of 9 out of 42 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03743766.

e21507Background: Prior reports have described an association with hepatic metastases and total TB with reduced response rates to anti-PD-1 treatment in subjects with advanced MEL. We explored base...

The authors interviewed two dozen educators at several institutions to better understand how data from the National Survey of Student Engagement were (or were not) being used. Their results offer guidance to those with dusty data binders on their shelves.

Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) may arise from both pre-capillary and post-capillary etiologies which can be evaluated and quantified by invasive hemodynamics (CATH). The impact of PH eti...