Search

Background: Trabectedin is an antineoplastic drug approved for patients (pts) with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Interestingly, the radiological evaluation of response during trabectedin therapy is peculiar. Methods: The aim of this single-center retrospective study is to analyze the concordance of response assessment according to RECIST compared with Choi criteria in patients with STS treated with trabectedin between 2009 and 2020 at Regina Elena National Cancer Institute in Rome. Results: We present the preliminary data collected in the last 2 months (mos) on 37 pts who received the diagnosis between 2015 and 2020, with a median age of 52.5 years (range 32–78). The median number of trabectedin cycles administered was four (range 2–50) for a median follow up of 5.83 months (range 1–60). Histological subtypes of STS were five (13.5%) leiomyosarcoma, 14 (37.8%) liposarcoma, nine (24.3%) undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, three (8.1%) synovial sarcoma, and six (16.2%) other rare histological subtypes. Eight pts (21.6%) received trabectedin in the first line setting, 21 (56.8%) in the second line, and seven (18.9%) received it in subsequent lines. One pt received trabectedin as neoadjuvant therapy in a clinical trial (ISG-STS 1001). Median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (CI95% 2.7–4.6); median overall survival was 34.3 months (CI95% 0–75.4). The radiological responses were evaluated with both RECIST and Choi criteria; responses matched in 33 pts (89.2%) but not in four (10.8%). The best responses obtained according to RECIST criteria were two (5.4%) partial response (PR), 13 (35.1%) stable disease (SD), and 22 (59.5%) progressive disease (PD). Instead, two (5.4%), 13 (35.1%), and 22 (59.5%) pts obtained PR, SD, and PD respectively, according to Choi criteria. Cohen’s kappa coefficient of concordance was 0.792 (p-value <0.002). A specialized radiologist performed all imaging examinations using a dedicated workstation in the same center. Conclusion: In this first analysis, the concordance between RECIST and Choi assessments demonstrates no statistically significant difference. Responses did not match for four pts. We are expanding the analysis to all pts included in the original cohort to confirm or deny these initial results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: In the present phase II randomized study, two different schedules of ondansetron were investigated as rescue antiemetic treatment for delayed emesis related to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).Materials and Methods: Patients scheduled to receive a first course of MEC were randomized to ondansetron 8 mg intramuscularly (arm A) or ondansetron 16 mg orally (arm B) as rescue antiemetic treatment for delayed emesis. Efficacy and safety evaluation was performed from days 2 to 6 through the administration of a diary plus a questionnaire in which the emetic episodes and the use of the assigned rescue treatment were recorded. All patients received standard prophylaxis for delayed emesis with oral dexamethasone 8 mg daily for 4 days starting on day 2.Results: Eighty-nine patients were enrolled into the study, of whom 44 were randomized to arm A and 45 to arm B. Twenty-two patients in each arm developed grade 1-2 delayed nausea/vomiting, all of which recurred to the rescue study treatment. Oral ondansetron resulted superior to intramuscular ondansetron in terms of complete response for nausea (77.3% vs 40.9%, respectively, p = 0.01) and vomiting (81.8% vs 31.8%, respectively, p = 0.001). Both schedules resulted to be very well tolerated, and no differences in toxicity were observed between the two arms of treatment. Furthermore, personal satisfaction about the use of the assigned rescue study medication was significantly higher in arm B.Conclusions: Due to its high efficacy and excellent tolerability, oral ondansetron is an important option in the management of MEC-related delayed emesis refractory to standard antiemetic prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, medicine has undergone profound changes, strongly entering a new phase defined as the "era of precision medicine". In this context, patient clinical management involves various scientific approaches that allow for a comprehensive pathology evaluation: from preventive processes (where applicable) to genetic and diagnostic studies. In this scenario, biobanks play an important role and, over the years, have gained increasing prestige, moving from small deposits to large collections of samples of various natures. Disease-oriented biobanks are rapidly developing as they provide useful information for the management of complex diseases, such as melanoma. Indeed, melanoma, given its highly heterogeneous characteristics, is one of the oncologic diseases with the greatest clinical and therapeutic management complexity. So, the possibility of extrapolating tissue, genetic and imaging data from dedicated biobanks could result in more selective study approaches. In this review, we specifically analyze the several biobank types to evaluate their role in technology development, patient monitoring and research of new biomarkers, especially in the melanoma context.

Paraneoplastic leukemoid reaction (PLR) is an extremely rare condition in patients with melanoma and it is frequently associated with poor prognosis. BRAF gene mutational analysis represents the gold standard in patients with inoperable or metastatic melanoma as the possible presence of target mutations allows the use of the combination treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. In this article, the case of a young woman with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic melanoma associated with PLR who received encorafenib and binimetinib is presented and discussed, with a focus on the relevant treatment response.

Background: Molecular Tumor Boards (MTB) operating in real-world have generated limited consensus on good practices for accrual, actionable alteration mapping, and outcome metrics. These topics are addressed herein in 124 MTB patients, all real-world accrued at progression, and lacking approved therapy options., Methods: Actionable genomic alterations identified by tumor DNA (tDNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling were mapped by customized OncoKB criteria to reflect diagnostic/therapeutic indications as approved in Europe. Alterations were considered non-SoC when mapped at either OncoKB level 3, regardless of tDNA/ctDNA origin, or at OncoKB levels 1/2, provided they were undetectable in matched tDNA, and had not been exploited in previous therapy lines., Results: Altogether, actionable alterations were detected in 54/124 (43.5%) MTB patients, but only in 39 cases (31%) were these alterations (25 from tDNA, 14 from ctDNA) actionable/unexploited, e.g. they had not resulted in the assignment of pre-MTB treatments. Interestingly, actionable and actionable/unexploited alterations both decreased (37.5% and 22.7% respectively) in a subset of 88 MTB patients profiled by tDNA-only, but increased considerably (77.7% and 66.7%) in 18 distinct patients undergoing combined tDNA/ctDNA testing, approaching the potential treatment opportunities (76.9%) in 147 treatment-naïve patients undergoing routine tDNA profiling for the first time. Non-SoC therapy was MTB-recommended to all 39 patients with actionable/unexploited alterations, but only 22 (56%) accessed the applicable drug, mainly due to clinical deterioration, lengthy drug-gathering procedures, and geographical distance from recruiting clinical trials. Partial response and stable disease were recorded in 8 and 7 of 19 evaluable patients, respectively. The time to progression (TTP) ratio (MTB-recommended treatment vs last pre-MTB treatment) exceeded the conventional Von Hoff 1.3 cut-off in 9/19 cases, high absolute TTP and Von Hoff values coinciding in 3 cases. Retrospectively, 8 patients receiving post-MTB treatment(s) as per physician's choice were noted to have a much longer overall survival from MTB accrual than 11 patients who had received no further treatment (35.09 vs 6.67 months, p = 0.006)., Conclusions: MTB-recommended/non-SoC treatments are effective, including those assigned by ctDNA-only alterations. However, real-world MTBs may inadvertently recruit patients electively susceptible to diverse and/or multiple treatments., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

BH3 mimetics, targeting the Bcl-2 family anti-apoptotic proteins, represent a promising therapeutic opportunity in cancers. ABT-199, the first specific Bcl-2 inhibitor, was approved by FDA for the treatment of several hematological malignancies. We have recently discovered IS21, a novel pan BH3 mimetic with preclinical antitumor activity in several tumor types. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of IS21 and other BH3 mimetics, both as single agents and combined with the currently used antineoplastic agents in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ovarian cancer, and melanoma. IS21 was found to be active in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, melanoma, lung, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer cell lines. Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 protein levels predicted IS21 sensitivity in melanoma and ovarian cancer, respectively. Exploring IS21 mechanism of action, we found that IS21 activity depends on the presence of BAX and BAK proteins: complexes between Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL proteins and their main binding partners were reduced after IS21 treatment. In combination experiments, BH3 mimetics sensitized leukemia cells to chemotherapy, ovarian cancer cells and melanoma models to PARP and MAPK inhibitors, respectively. We showed that this enhancing effect was related to the potentiation of the apoptotic pathway, both in hematologic and solid tumors. In conclusion, our data suggest the use of inhibitors of anti-apoptotic proteins as a therapeutic strategy to enhance the efficacy of anticancer treatment., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Immunotherapy has improved the survival of patients with stage IV melanoma. In responders, clinical benefits may be long-lasting and persist even after treatment discontinuation. The optimal duration of anti-PD1 (anti-Programmed cell death-1) therapy in metastatic melanoma patients remains to be elucidated. Moreover, limited data are available on clinical outcomes of patients that discontinued anti-PD1 immunotherapy in a real-life setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic melanoma who interrupted anti-PD-1 treatment in the in the absence of disease progression., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy at 23 Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI) centres. The study investigated the risk of relapse in patients who stopped anti-PD1 therapy due to CR (Complete response), treatment-related toxicity, or by their own choice after a long period of treatment. Clinical and biological factors associated with or without recurrence were evaluated., Results: The study population included 237 patients. The median age of patients was 68.9 years (standard deviation: 13; range 33-95). The median time on treatment was 33 months (standard deviation: 18, 7; range 1-98). Among the 237 patients, 128 (54%) interrupted the anti-PD1 for CR, 74 patients (31.2%) for adverse events (37 patients in CR, 27 patients in partial response (PR), ten patients in stable disease (SD), and 35 patients (14.8%) by their own choice (12 patients in CR, 17 patients in PR, and 6 patients in SD). After a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 1-81), PFS after anti-PD1 discontinuation was 85.7%. Thirty-four patients (14.3%) developed disease progression after a median of 12 months (range 1-35): ten patients (29.4%) after discontinuation in CR, 17 patients (50%) after discontinuation for treatment-related toxicity (seven in CR, five in PR, five in SD), and seven (20.6%) after discontinuation due to the patient's decision (two in CR, four in PR, one in SD). Only 7.8% of patients who interrupted in CR (10/128), along with 23% of patients who interrupted for limiting toxicity (17/74) and 20% of patients who interrupted by their own choice (7/35), developed recurrence. Regarding patients who discontinued therapy because of CR, we observed a negative association between recurrence and site of primary melanoma, especially mucosal sites (p = <0.05, HR (Hazard ratio) 15.57 IC (confidence interval) 95% 2.64-91.73). Moreover, M1b patients who achieved a CR showed a lower number of relapses (p = <0.05, HR 3.84 IC 95% 1.40-8.48)., Conclusions: This study shows in a real-life setting that, with anti-PD-1 therapy, long-lasting responses, can be maintained after anti-PD1 interruption. In 70.6% of cases, recurrences were observed among patients who did not obtain a CR at treatment discontinuation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Marco Rubatto: nothing to declare, Paolo Fava: nothing to declare, Ignazio Stanganelli: nothing to declare, Simone Ribero: nothing to declare, Jacopo Pigozzo Advisory board BMS, MSD, Novartis, Anna Maria Di Giacomo: has served as a consultant and/or advisor to Incyte, Pierre Fabre, Glaxo Smith Kline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp Dohme, Immunocore, SunPharma and Sanofi and has received compensated educational activities from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp Dohme, Pierre Fabre and Sanofi, Laura Ridolfi: nothing to declare, Maria Chiara Tronconi: nothing to declare, Claudia Trojaniello: sanofi, Melissa Bersanelli: nothing to declare, Mattia Garutti honoraria or consultation fees from Novartis, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre and Roche, and travel fees from Daichii Sankyo, all outside the submitted work, Alice Indini: nothing to declare, Ivana De Risi: nothing to declare, Michele De Tursi: nothing to declare, Barbara Merelli: nothing to declare, Francesca Morgese: nothing to declare, Marcella Occelli: nothing to declare, Gian Carlo Antonini Cappellini: nothing to declare, Stefano Poletto: nothing to declare, Dahlia Fedele: nothing to declare, Sonia Brugnara: nothing to declare, Michela Frisinghelli: nothing to declare, Luigi Formisano: LF has received research funding from Lilly outside the submitted work. LF is on the Advisory Board for Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi, MSD and BMS, Raffaele Conca: nothing to declare, Marco Tucci: nothing to declare, Michelangelo Russillo: nothing to declare, Luca Ceroni: nothing to declare, Paola Queirolo: nothing to declare, Giada Targato: nothing to declare, Sabino Strippoli: nothing to declare, Mario Mandalà: Advisory board and lectures for: MSD, BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sun Pharma Research grant: Novartis, Michele Guida: nothing to declare, Pietro Quaglino: nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Precision medicine has driven a major change in the treatment of many forms of cancer. The discovery that each patient is different and each tumor mass has its own characteristics has shifted the focus of basic and clinical research to the singular individual. Liquid biopsy (LB), in this sense, presents new scenarios in personalized medicine through the study of molecules, factors, and tumor biomarkers in blood such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), exosomes and circulating tumor microRNAs (ct-miRNAs). Moreover, its easy application and complete absence of contraindications for the patient make this method applicable in a great many fields. Melanoma, given its highly heterogeneous characteristics, is a cancer form that could significantly benefit from the information linked to liquid biopsy, especially in the treatment management. In this review, we will focus our attention on the latest applications of liquid biopsy in metastatic melanoma and possible developments in the clinical setting.

Rationale: Metastatic melanoma is the most aggressive and dangerous form of skin cancer. The introduction of immunotherapy with Immune checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) and of targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors for BRAF mutated melanoma, has greatly improved the clinical outcome of these patients. Nevertheless, response to therapy remains highly variable and the development of drug resistance continues to be a daunting challenge. Within this context there is a need to develop diagnostic tools capable of predicting response or resistance to therapy in order to select the best therapeutic approach. Over the years, accumulating evidence brought to light the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) as disease biomarkers. Methods: In particular, the detection of miRNAs in whole blood or specific blood components such as serum or plasma, allows these molecules to be good candidates for diagnosis, prognosis and for monitoring response to anticancer therapy. In this paper, we evaluated circulating basal levels of 6 previously identified miRNAs in serum samples of 70 BRAF-mutant melanoma patients before starting targeted therapy. Results: Results show that the circulating levels of the oncosuppressor miR-579-3p and of the oncomiR miR-4488 are able to predict progression free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS). Most importantly, we observed that the best predictor of disease outcome is represented by the ratio of circulating miR-4488 vs. miR-579-3p (miRatio). Finally, the combination of the Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) blood levels with the two circulating miRNAs alone or together did not produce any improvement in predicting PFS indicating that miR-579-3p and miR-4488 are independent predictors of PFS as compared to LDH. Conclusions: All together these data underscored the relevance of circulating miRNAs as suitable tools to predict therapy response in melanoma and maybe further developed as companion diagnostics in the clinic., Competing Interests: Competing Interests: All the authors declare no conflict of interest with the exception of P.A.A. Paolo A. Ascierto has/had a consultant/advisory role for Bristol MyersSquibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Merck Serono, Pierre-Fabre, AstraZeneca, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Idera, Sandoz, Immunocore, 4SC, Italfarmaco, Nektar, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Oncosec, Nouscom, Lunaphore, Seagen, iTeos, Medicenna, Bio-Al Health, ValoTX, Replimmune. He also received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Pfizer, Sanofi. Travel support by Pfizer. The funders of this study had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results., (© The author(s).)

Breast cancer is still the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women aged 20-59 and metastatic breast cancer remains an incurable disease. The therapeutic paradigm of patients with HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer has been expanded by the introduction of the inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6. Three compounds, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, have already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use together with endocrine therapy; abemaciclib is also approved as a single agent. In the first-line setting, all three agents - together with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) - substantially prolonged progression-free survival. Hematologic toxicities are the most common adverse events associated with CDK4/6i, mainly with palbociclib and ribociclib. Due to the hematologic toxicity, the prescribing information of palbociclib (P) recommends monitoring complete blood counts before starting therapy and at the beginning of each cycle, as well as on day 15 of the first 2 cycles. However, there are no guidelines regarding the management of patients candidate to CDK4/6i who have bone marrow impairment. Neutropenia frequently occurs during the treatment with P, whereas thrombocytopenia represents a rare event. We here report a case of a 60-year-old woman with idiopathic thrombocytopenia treated with P plus letrozole, who presented a metabolic complete response.

Objectives: Target therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors in metastatic melanoma is characterised by a high response rate; however, acquired resistance to treatment develops in many cases. We aimed to investigate if baseline total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) and therapy-response assessment by [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT have a prognostic role on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving BRAF ± MEK inhibitors., Methods: Fifty-seven patients who performed an [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT at baseline and on treatment were retrospectively evaluated. A Cox proportional-hazard model was used to examine associations between OS and PFS with baseline clinical/PET parameters as well as for PET response., Results: According to EORTC criteria, 34 patients were classified as responders (partial/complete metabolic response [PMR/CMR]) and 23 as non-responders (progressive/stable metabolic disease [PMD/SMD]). Baseline characteristics associated with a shorter PFS were more than two metastatic organ sites and TMTV > 56 cm 3 ; the latter was the only independent feature at multivariate analysis. Patients achieving a CMR were associated with a prolonged PFS compared with those with PMR (median PFS 42.9 vs 8.8 months; p = 0.009). Disease progression occurred in new-onset disease sites in 87.5% of CMR, 7.1% of PMR and 34.8% of PMD/SMD (p < 0.001). High baseline TMTV and lack of treatment response were independent prognostic factors for OS, stratifying patients in three different prognostic classes (median OS 6.7, 18.3 and 102.2 months, respectively)., Conclusions: Baseline TMTV and metabolic response may be useful prognostic indicators for PFS and OS in patients with advanced melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors., Key Points: • In a retrospective cohort of 57 metastatic melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, a TMTV > 56 cm 3 at baseline [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT was significantly correlated with a shorter PFS and OS. • The combined use of baseline TMTV along with PET response during treatment allowed for the identification of three groups of patients with very different median OS., (© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

In the era of artificial intelligence and precision medicine, the use of quantitative imaging methodological approaches could improve the cancer patient's therapeutic approaches. Specifically, our pilot study aims to explore whether CT texture features on both baseline and first post-treatment contrast-enhanced CT may act as a predictor of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic melanoma (MM) patients treated with the PD-1 inhibitor Nivolumab. Ninety-four lesions from 32 patients treated with Nivolumab were analyzed. Manual segmentation was performed using a free-hand polygon approach by drawing a region of interest (ROI) around each target lesion (up to five lesions were selected per patient according to RECIST 1.1). Filtration-histogram-based texture analysis was employed using a commercially available research software called TexRAD (Feedback Medical Ltd, London, UK; https://fbkmed.com/texrad-landing-2/) Percentage changes in texture features were calculated to perform delta-radiomics analysis. Texture feature kurtosis at fine and medium filter scale predicted OS and PFS. A higher kurtosis is correlated with good prognosis; kurtosis values greater than 1.11 for SSF = 2 and 1.20 for SSF = 3 were indicators of higher OS (fine texture: 192 HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.32-0.96, p = 0.03; medium texture: HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.29-0.99, p = 0.04) and PFS (fine texture: HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.29-0.95, p = 0.03; medium texture: HR = 0.49, 209 95% CI = 0.25-0.96, p = 0.03). In delta-radiomics analysis, the entropy percentage variation correlated with OS and PFS. Increasing entropy indicates a worse outcome. An entropy variation greater than 5% was an indicator of bad prognosis. CT delta-texture analysis quantified as entropy predicted OS and PFS. Baseline CT texture quantified as kurtosis also predicted survival baseline. Further studies with larger cohorts are mandatory to confirm these promising exploratory results., Competing Interests: One of the authors, BG, (who was not a data controller for this study) is the co-founder/co-inventor of TexRAD texture analysis software used in this study and a shareholder (not an employee) of Feedback Plc., a UK based company that owns, develops, and markets the TexRAD texture analysis software. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Guerrisi, Russillo, Loi, Ganeshan, Ungania, Desiderio, Bruzzaniti, Falcone, Renna, Ferraresi, Caterino, Solivetti, Cognetti and Morrone.)

Introduction: Patients with cancer have an increased risk of complications from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, including death, and thus, they were considered as high-priority subjects for COVID-19 vaccination. We report on the compliance with the COVID-19 vaccine of patients affected by solid tumours., Materials and Methods: Patients with cancer afferent to Medical Oncology 1 Unit of Regina Elena National Cancer Institute in Rome were considered eligible for vaccination if they were receiving systemic immunosuppressive antitumor treatment or received it in the last 6 months or having an uncontrolled advanced disease. The Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine was proposed to all candidates via phone or during a scheduled visit. The reasons for refusal were collected by administrating a 6-item multiple-choice questionnaire., Results: From 1st March to 20th March 2021, of 914 eligible patients, 102 refused vaccination (11.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.1-13.2). The most frequent (>10%) reasons reported were concerns about vaccine-related adverse events (48.1%), negative interaction with concomitant antitumor therapy (26.7%), and the fear of allergic reaction (10.7%). The refusal rate (RR) after 15th March (date of AstraZeneca-AZD1222 suspension) was more than doubled compared with the RR observed before (19.7% versus 8.6%, odds ratio [OR] 2.60, 95% CI 1.69-3.99; P < 0.0001). ECOG-PS 2 was associated with higher RR compared with ECOG-PS 0-1 (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.04-8.34; P = 0.04). No statistically significant differences in RR according to other clinical characteristics were found., Conclusions: Our experience represents the first worldwide report on the adherence of patients with cancer to COVID-19 vaccination and underlines how regulatory decisions and media news spreading could influence the success of the campaign., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement V.D.N. received speaker’s fee by AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Istituto Gentili, Boehringer Ingelheim. V.D.N. received grant consultancies by AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim and travel fee from MSD and Boehringer Ingelheim. V.D.N. received institutional research grants from Roche. F.C. was a member of advisory board of GSK, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Eli-Lilly. F.C. received speaker’s fee by GSK, Roche, AstraZeneca, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, Astellas, and Eli-Lilly. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)