Search

It remains unclear whether screening for advanced fibrosis in the community can identify the subgroup of people with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) at higher risk for development of liver‐related complications. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of baseline noninvasive fibrosis tests for predicting liver‐related outcomes and mortality in patients with NAFLD from type 2 diabetes (T2D) clinics or primary care. Patients (n = 243) who were screened for NAFLD with advanced fibrosis by using NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis 4 score (FIB‐4), enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test, and liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) were followed up for clinical outcomes by review of electronic medical records. During a median follow‐up of 50 months, decompensated liver disease or primary liver cancer occurred in 6 of 35 (17.1%) patients with baseline LSM > 13 kPa, 1 of 17 (5.9%) patients with LSM 9.5‐13 kPa, and in no patients with LSM < 9.5 kPa. No patient with low‐risk NFS developed liver decompensation or liver‐related mortality. Following repeat NFSs at the end of follow‐up, all patients with a liver‐related complication were in the high‐risk NFS category. Patients who developed liver‐related complications were also more likely to have baseline high‐risk FIB‐4 scores or ELF test ≥9.8 compared to patients who did not develop liver outcomes. Conclusion: Liver fibrosis risk stratification in non‐hepatology settings can identify the subset of patients at risk of liver‐related complications. Although the rate of development of a decompensation event or hepatocellular carcinoma was low (2.1% per year) in our patients with compensated cirrhosis (LSM > 13 kPa), these events are projected to lead to a substantial increase in NAFLD‐related disease burden over the next decade due to the high prevalence of NAFLD in people with obesity and T2D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Materials and Methods Results Conclusion To investigate the utilization and costs of non‐insulin glucose‐lowering drugs (GLDs) in Australia from 2013 to 2023.We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) administrative dataset of 118 727 494 GLD prescriptions. The main outcome measures were the annual number of GLD prescriptions dispensed, accounting for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) prevalence and healthcare system costs, adjusted for inflation.Utilization of GLDs doubled from 6.4 million prescriptions in 2013 to 15.6 million in 2023. The average annual percent increase in utilization was 8.1%, compared to the average annual increase in prevalence of T2DM of 1.8%. The biggest change was in sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, for which there was an average annual increase in utilization of 59.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51.7%, 68.2%; p < 0.05) from 2014 (first full year of PBS listing), followed by glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs), which showed an increase of 31.4% (95% CI 28.5%, 33.8%; p < 0.05) annually (2013 to 2023). Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor utilization tripled, with an average annual increase of 10.9% (95% CI 8.1%, 13.8%; p < 0.05), but this plateaued from 2020. Metformin utilization increased by 4.7% (95% CI 2.0%, 6.9%; p < 0.05) annually. In contrast, sulphonylurea, glitazone and acarbose utilization declined. Total GLD costs increased threefold over the same period. Despite only accounting for 11.7% of utilization, GLP‐1RAs contributed to 35% of the costs.Utilization of GLDs doubled, and associated costs tripled over the past 11 years, with no sign of either utilization or costs plateauing, predominantly due to increased GLP‐1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor prescribing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Lower extremity amputation results in significant global morbidity and mortality. Australia appears to have a paucity of studies investigating lower extremity amputation. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to investigate key conditions associated with lower extremity amputations in an Australian population. Secondary objectives were to determine the influence of age and sex on lower extremity amputations, and the reliability of hospital coded amputations. Methods Lower extremity amputation cases performed at the Princess Alexandra Hospital (Brisbane, Australia) between July 2006 and June 2007 were identified through the relevant hospital discharge dataset (n = 197). All eligible clinical records were interrogated for age, sex, key condition associated with amputation, amputation site, first ever amputation status and the accuracy of the original hospital coding. Exclusion criteria included records unavailable for audit and cases where the key condition was unable to be determined. Chi-squared, t-tests, ANOVA and post hoc tests were used to determine differences between groups. Kappa statistics were used to measure reliability between coded and audited amputations. A minimum significance level of p Results One hundred and eighty-six cases were eligible and audited. Overall 69% were male, 56% were first amputations, 54% were major amputations, and mean age was 62 ± 16 years. Key conditions associated included type 2 diabetes (53%), peripheral arterial disease (non-diabetes) (18%), trauma (8%), type 1 diabetes (7%) and malignant tumours (5%). Differences in ages at amputation were associated with trauma 36 ± 10 years, type 1 diabetes 52 ± 12 years and type 2 diabetes 67 ± 10 years (p Conclusions This study, the first in over 20 years to report on all levels of lower extremity amputations in Australia, found that people undergoing amputation are more likely to be older, male and have diabetes. It is recommended that large prospective studies are implemented and national lower extremity amputation rates are established to address the large preventable burden of lower extremity amputation in Australia.

Aims: To evaluate if glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) reduce antipsychotic‐associated body weight gain in patients with schizophrenia, when compared to controls. Materials and methods: We systematically searched PubMed/EMBASE/PsycINFO/Cochrane using the search terms '(antipsychotic and GLP‐1RA)'. Individual participant data from studies randomizing patients to GLP‐1RA or control were meta‐analysed. The primary outcome was difference in body weight between GLP‐1RA and control; secondary outcomes included cardio‐metabolic variables and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Multiple linear regression was conducted including sex, age, psychosis severity, metabolic variable, ADRs, and GLP‐1RA agent. Results: Three studies (exenatide once‐weekly = 2; liraglutide once‐daily = 1) provided participant‐level data (n = 164, age = 40.0 ± 11.1 years, body weight = 105.8 ± 20.8 kg). After 16.2 ± 4.0 weeks of treatment, body weight loss was 3.71 kg (95% CI = 2.44‐4.99 kg) greater for GLP‐1RA versus control (p < 0.001), number‐needed‐to‐treat ≥5% body weight loss = 3.8 (95% CI = 2.6‐7.2). Waist circumference, body mass index, HbA1c, fasting glucose and visceral adiposity were each significantly lower with GLP‐1RA. Sex, age, psychosis severity, nausea, any ADR, and GLP‐1RA agent did not significantly impact outcomes. Body weight loss with GLP‐1RAs was greater for clozapine/olanzapine‐treated patients (n = 141) than other antipsychotics (n = 27) (4.70 kg, 95% CI = 3.13‐6.27 vs. 1.5 kg, 95% CI = −1.47‐4.47) (p < 0.001). Nausea was more common with GLP‐1RAs than control (53.6% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.002, number‐needed‐to‐harm = 3.8). Conclusion: GLP‐1RAs are effective and tolerable for antipsychotic‐associated body weight gain, particularly clozapine/olanzapine‐treated patients. With few included patients, further studies are required before making routine use recommendations for GLP‐1RAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]