Search

The majority of somatosensory DRG neurons express GABAA receptors (GABAAR) and depolarise in response to its activation based on the high intracellular chloride concentration maintained by the Na-K-Cl cotransporter type 1 (NKCC1). The translation of this response to peripheral nerve terminals in people is so far unclear. We show here that GABA (EC50 = 16.67μM) acting via GABAAR produces an influx of extracellular calcium in approximately 20% (336/1720) of isolated mouse DRG neurons. In contrast, upon injection into forearm skin of healthy volunteers GABA (1mM, 100μl) did not induce any overt sensations nor a specific flare response and did not sensitize C-nociceptors to slow depolarizing electrical sinusoidal stimuli. Block of the inward chloride transporter NKCC1 by furosemide (1mg/100μl) did not reduce electrically evoked pain ratings nor did repetitive GABA stimulation in combination with an inhibited NKCC1 driven chloride replenishment by furosemide. Finally, we generated a sustained period of C-fiber firing by iontophoretically delivering codeine or histamine to induce tonic itch. Neither the intensity nor the duration of histamine or codeine itch was affected by prior injection of furosemide. We conclude that although GABA can evoke calcium transients in a proportion of isolated mouse DRG neurons, it does not induce or modify pain or itch ratings in healthy human skin even when chloride gradients are altered by inhibition of the sodium coupled NKCC1 transporter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intradermal injection of 1 µg nerve growth factor (NGF) causes sustained nociceptor sensitization. Slowly depolarizing electrical current preferentially activates C‐nociceptors. Methods: We explored the differential contribution of A‐delta and C‐nociceptors in NGF‐sensitized skin using slowly depolarizing transcutaneous electrical current stimuli, CO2 laser heat, mechanical impact, and A‐fibre compression block. In 14 healthy volunteers, pain rating was recorded on a numeric scale at days 1–14 after NGF treatment. Ratings during A‐fibre conduction block were investigated at days 3 and 7 post‐NGF. Results: Pain ratings to electrical, CO2 heat and mechanical impact stimuli were enhanced (>30%, p <.0005, ANOVA) at NGF‐injection sites. Axon reflex erythema evoked by electrical stimulation was also larger at NGF‐injection sites (p <.02, ANOVA). Diminution of pain during continuous (1 min) sinusoidal current stimulation at 4 Hz was less pronounced after NGF (p <.05, ANOVA). Pain ratings to electrical sinusoidal and mechanical impact stimuli during A‐fibre conduction block were significantly elevated at the NGF sites compared to NaCl‐treated skin (p <.05, ANOVA). Conclusions: NGF‐induced sensitization of human skin to electrical and mechanical stimuli is primarily driven by C‐nociceptors with little contribution from A‐delta fibres. Less‐pronounced accommodation during ongoing sinusoidal stimulation suggests that NGF could facilitate axonal spike generation and conduction in primary afferent nociceptors in humans. Further studies using this sinusoidal electrical stimulation profile to investigate patients with chronic inflammatory pain may allow localized assessment of skin C‐nociceptors and their putative excitability changes under pathologic conditions. Significance: The application of novel slowly depolarizing electrical stimuli demonstrated a predominant C‐nociceptor sensitization in NGF‐treated skin. Increased pain ratings, larger axon reflex erythema and less accommodation of C‐fibres to ongoing sinusoidal stimulation all indicated an enhanced nociceptor discharge after NGF. A‐fibre conduction block had little effect on electrical and mechanical hyperalgesia skin in NGF‐treated compared to NaCl‐treated skin. This electrical stimulus profile may be applicable for patients with chronic inflammatory pain, allowing localized assessment of skin C‐nociceptors and their putative excitability changes under pathologic conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sinusoidal current stimuli preferentially activate C-nociceptors. Sodium channel isoforms NaV1.7 and NaV1.8 have been implicated in this. Sympathetic efferent neurons lack NaV1.8 and were explored upon sinusoidal activation.Methods: Quantitative Sudomotor Axon Reflex Test (QSART) was performed in hairy (n = 16) and glabrous (n = 12) skin. Responses of sympathetic efferents (n = 10) and nociceptive afferents (n = 21) to sinusoidal current stimulation (4 Hz, 0.05-0.15 mA) were recorded in humans by microneurography (n = 11). Activation of sympathetic units upon supra-threshold sinusoidal currents (>0.8 mA) was recorded in pigs (n = 8).Results: Sinusoidal stimuli (4 Hz, 0.4 mA) evoked weak sweat output (30 ml/h/m2 ) in hairy skin compared to rectangular pulses (4 Hz, 5 mA, 53 ml/h/m2 , p < .00001, ANOVA). No change in sweat output was recorded from glabrous skin to sine wave stimuli. Sinusoidal current at intensities ranging from 0.05 to 0.15 mA activated almost all (85%) nociceptors but only 40% of sympathetic units in human. Stimuli lead to a significantly lower activation in sympathetic versus nociceptive fibres as measured by activity-dependent slowing (ADS) of conduction (sympathetic efferents average ADS 100 ± 0.2% vs. C-nociceptors average ADS 113 ± 4%, p < .003, ANOVA).Conclusions: Sympathetic efferent neurons are less apt to convert slow depolarizations into action potentials as compared to nociceptors. Distinctive sodium channel expression patterns between nociceptors and sympathetic efferent neurons may account for this difference. Sinusoidal stimulation therefore provokes weak sweat responses and provides no alternative for clinical assessment of autonomic function.Significance: C-nociceptors in hairy skin are activated by 4 Hz sinusoidal current stimulation at lower intensities than myelinated fibres. Sympathetic efferent neurons-albeit also unmyelinated-are less responsive to sinusoidal activation than nociceptors within the same skin area. Cutaneous sympathetic efferent neurons apparently are less apt than nociceptors to convert slow depolarization into action potentials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]