Search

BACKGROUND: Pruritus is a common condition in chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially for patients receiving haemodialysis. CKD-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) can be distressing and have a negative impact on quality of life (QoL). This post hoc analysis aimed to assess the relationship between pruritus relief and QoL. METHODS: Data from phase 3 trials [(NCT03422653, NCT03636269 grouped), and NCT03998163] of the novel antipruritic difelikefalin (N = 914) were used to assess the relationship between reductions in pruritus intensity at Week 12 (24-h Worst Itching Intensity Numeric Rating Scale; WI-NRS), perceived improvement in itch (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGI-C) and pruritus-related QoL (Skindex-10 questionnaire). RESULTS: Patients receiving difelikefalin had greater improvements in Skindex-10 total scores than those receiving placebo [LS mean treatment difference -3.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.5, -1.3; P = .002] and greater improvements across Skindex-10 domains (disease, mood and social functioning) at Week 12. In patients receiving difelikefalin, those with clinically meaningful improvements in pruritus (≥3-point reduction in WI-NRS score) at Week 12 had a greater improvement in Skindex-10 total score (mean difference 14.2; 95% CI 11.0, 17.3; P

BACKGROUND: Poor sleep quality is associated with higher mortality and lower quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP). Difelikefalin reduces itch in patients with CKD-aP undergoing haemodialysis (HD). This post hoc analysis of the Phase 3 difelikefalin studies (Study 3105 and the pooled dataset from KALM-1 and KALM-2) evaluated whether itch reduction in individuals with CKD-aP improved sleep quality. METHODS: Itch intensity was assessed in patients undergoing HD who had moderate-to-severe CKD-aP treated with intravenous difelikefalin (0.5 µg/kg, three times weekly) (N = 222, Study 3105; N = 426, KALM-1 and -2) or placebo (N = 425, KALM-1 and -2) for 12 weeks, using the Worst Itch Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS). Sleep quality was assessed using the sleep disability question of the 5-D Itch Scale (5-D SDQ) in all studies and, in Study 3105, with the Sleep Quality Numeric Rating Scale (SQ-NRS). RESULTS: Greater improvements in sleep quality were observed in patients with ≥3-point versus

Background The associations between self-reported chronic kidney disease–associated pruritus (CKD-aP) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been reported using various instruments to assess itch. Data collection via multiple CKD-aP instruments allows the evaluation of different domains and measurements of CKD-aP burden and may help tailor data capture for future research or clinical care. Methods An electronic PRO (ePRO) survey was distributed to European hemodialysis (HD) patients enrolled in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) in 2021–23. The DOPPS is an international cohort study that aims to investigate practice patterns and outcomes in HD patients. The ePRO survey included multiple CKD-aP instruments: Average Itch and Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scales (AI-NRS, WI-NRS) and a Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL)-36 single question. Linear and logistic regression were used to estimate adjusted associations between CKD-aP instruments and various PROs. Results This analysis included 769 patients who completed the WI-NRS from HD facilities in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the UK. The correlation between WI-NRS and the KDQOL-36 itch question was 0.88 overall and 0.46 among patients at least somewhat bothered by itch. Mean WI-NRS scores stratified by response to the KDQOL-36 itch question were 8.1, 6.4, 4.1 and 3.1 for extremely, very much, moderately and somewhat bothered, respectively. Patients with worse WI-NRS scores reported worse sleep quality, greater fatigue, more depressive symptoms, and lower mental and physical quality of life; these associations were similar to those observed for the KDQOL-36 itch question. Conclusion Correlation between CKD-aP instruments was high overall, but moderate among the subgroup of patients bothered by itch; differences can be partially attributed to the recall period for the KDQOL-36 (4 weeks) vs the AI- and WI-NRS (24 h). The consistent associations of these instruments with poor outcomes underscores the importance to identify and effectively treat HD patients suffering from pruritus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]