Search

This text is based on the recommendations accepted by the 4th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer, modified based on the international consultation and conference within the frames of the Central-Eastern European Academy of Oncology. The professional guideline primarily reflects the resolutions and recommendations of the current ESMO, NCCN and ABC5, as well as that of the St. Gallen Consensus Conference statements. The recommendations cover classical prognostic factors and certain multigene tests, which play an important role in therapeutic decision-making. From a didactic point of view, the text first addresses early and then locally advanced breast cancer, followed by locoregionally recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Within these, we discuss each group according to the available therapeutic options. At the end of the recommendations, we summarize the criteria for treatment in certain rare clinical situations., FUNDING The publication fee is covered by funding of the Central Eastern European Academy of Oncology Foundation, National Institute of Oncology 1122 Budapest Ráth Gy. u 7-9 Correspondence: Gábor Rubovszky, moc.liamg@gykzsvobur † These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Background: Pembrolizumab monotherapy showed durable antitumour activity and manageable safety in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. We aimed to examine whether the addition of pembrolizumab would enhance the antitumour activity of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Methods: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial, done in 209 sites in 29 countries, we randomly assigned patients 2:1 with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer using a block method (block size of six) and an interactive voice-response system with integrated web-response to pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 3 weeks plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel; paclitaxel; or gemcitabine plus carboplatin) or placebo plus chemotherapy. Randomisation was stratified by type of on-study chemotherapy (taxane or gemcitabine–carboplatin), PD-L1 expression at baseline (combined positive score [CPS] ?1 or, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, BCRF; Pfizer; AstraZeneca; Merck; Roche; Samsung; Merck Sharp and Dohme, MSD; Eisai, JC reports personal fees and research funding paid to his institution from Roche, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Eisai; personal fees from Celgene, Cellestia, Biothera Pharmaceutical, Merus, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, Servier, GlaxoSmithKline, Leuko, Bioasis, Clovis Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis; research funding paid to his institution from Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Healthcare, F Hoffman-La Roche, Guardanth Health, Piqur Therapeutics, Puma C, and Queen Mary University of London, outside the submitted work. In addition, JC has a MedSIR patent pending. DWC reports research support from Merck during the conduct of the study; research support paid to his institution from Merck, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees from Merck, Roche–Genentech, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Puma, Agenda, Exact Sciences, and Dynamo Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. In addition, DWC has a Biomarkers of TTK inhibitors patent pending. HSR reports funding for sponsored studies paid to the University of California San Francisco from Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Roche–Genentech, Macrogenics, OBI, Merck, Eisai, Immunomedics, Daiichi Sankyo, Seattle Genetics, and Odonate; travel support for educational meetings from Daiichi Sankyo, Mylan, Pfizer, Merck, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Macrogenics; and consulting fees from Samsung and Puma, outside the submitted work. S-AI reports grants from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Pfizer, Roche, and Daewoong; an advisory role for AstraZeneca, Amgen, Eisai, Hanmi, Novartis, Lily, MedPacto, Pfizer, and Roche; and travel expenses for presentation from Novartis, outside the submitted work. CG reports Advisory Board fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche; and speaker's bureau fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. CHB reports grants and fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme for clinical research consulting during the conduct of the study; consulting–advisory role fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, and Bayer; consulting–advisory role fees and grants for clinical research from Novartis, Pfizer, Roche–Genentech, Eisai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and AstraZeneca; grants for clinical research from Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Covance, Lilly, Medication, Merck Serono, and PharmaMar; grants for academic research projects from CPO, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Grupo Brasileiro Estudos Câncer Mama, and Instituto Nacional de Câncer-Brazil, outside the submitted work. HI reports a grant from Merck Sharp & Dohme during the conduct of the study; honoraria and consulting fees from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, and Chugai; and a grant from Chugai, outside the submitted work. NM reports honoraria and research funding paid to his institution from Chugai, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Eli-Lilly, Eisai, Takeda, Kyowa-Kirin, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work. EG reports non-financial support from Merck Sharp & Dohme during the conduct of the study; honoraria, consulting–advisory fees and meeting support from Novartis, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer; and honoraria from AstraZeneca and Astellas, outside the submitted work. SL reports research funding or consulting fees paid to her institution from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche–Genentech, Puma Biotechnology, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eli Lilly, Aduro Biotech, GI Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, and GlaxoSmithKline; and non-remunerated consultancy for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche–Genentech, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. In addition, SL is supported by the National Breast Cancer Foundation of Australia Endowed Chair and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, New York. ZG, JZ, GA, and VK are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme and own stock or stock options in Merck. PS reports consultancy fees from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Eisai, Celgene, and Puma; consultancy fees to his spouse from Genentech and Roche; and grants or funding to his institution from Roche, Genentech, Oncogenex, Novartis, Astellas, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., The authors thank the patients, their families and caregivers for participating in this trial, all of the investigators and site personnel, and the following employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme: Wilbur Pan, Deborah Card, Eleanor Readinger, Shana Hamm, Roger Maxwell, and Krystal Bourdon, for collection of data, supervision of research, provision of study materials or patients or administrative or logistical support; Aline Galvao, for collection of data, supervision of research, administrative or logistical support, and review of imaging data related to the primary end point; Donna Letizia, for collection of data and imaging expertise; Jennifer Kimmel, for study management; Mercedes Bustamante, for data collection and management; Xuan Zhou and Madhusudhan Reddy Papasani, for statistical expertise; Christine McCrary Sisk, for medical writing and editorial assistance; and Joseph C Naggar and Michele McColgan, for administrative or logistical support.