Search

Previously, we introduced an alternative adherent A375 cell line for clastogenicity and aneugenicity testing using a high content imaging platform. To further characterize the performance of A375 cells, we investigated the sensitivity and specificity of A375 and TK6 cells by directly comparing micronucleus (MN) induction, cytotoxicity (relative cell counts, viability, and apoptosis), clastogenicity (γH2AX), and aneuploidy markers (pH 3, MPM-2, and polyploidy) using flow cytometric methods. We evaluated 14 compounds across different mechanisms (non-genotoxic apoptosis inducers, clastogens, and aneugens with either tubulin binding or aurora kinase inhibiting phenotypes) at 4-h and 24-h post treatment. Both aneugens and clastogens tested positive for micronucleus induction in both cell lines. Apoptosis continued to be a confounding factor for flow cytometry-based micronuclei assessment in TK6 cells as evidenced by positive responses by the three cytotoxicants. Conversely, A375 cells were not affected by apoptosis-related false positive signals and did not produce a positive response in the in vitro micronucleus assay. Benchmark dose response (BMD) analysis showed that the induction of micronuclei and biomarkers occurred at similar concentrations in both cell lines for clastogens and aneugens. By showing that A375 cells have similar sensitivity to TK6 cells but a greater specificity, these results provide additional support for A375 cells to be used as an alternative adherent cell line for in vitro genetic toxicology assessment., (© 2024 Pfizer Inc. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Environmental Mutagenesis and Genomics Society.)

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are approved as monotherapies in BRCA1/2 -mutated (m BRCA1/2 ) metastatic breast and ovarian cancers, and in advanced pancreatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers. Differential safety profiles across PARPi necessitate improved mechanistic understanding of inhibitor differences, especially with expansion of PARPi indications and drug combinations. Here, we report in vitro evaluations of PARPi (-/+ PARP trapper temozolomide, TMZ) with reference to total clinical mean concentration average or maximum (tC avg , tC max ), to elucidate contributions of primary pharmacology and structural differences to clinical efficacy and safety. In biochemical assays, rucaparib and niraparib demonstrated off-target secondary pharmacology activities, and in selectivity assays, talazoparib, olaparib, and rucaparib inhibited a broader panel of PARP enzymes. In donor-derived human bone marrow mononuclear cells, only olaparib both increased early apoptosis and decreased the cell viability half inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) at ≤ tC avg , whereas other PARPi only did so in the presence of TMZ. In cancer cell lines with DNA damage repair mutations, all PARPi decreased cell viability in H1048 but not TK6 cells, and only talazoparib decreased cell growth in DU145 cells at ≤ tC avg concentrations. When combined with low dose TMZ, only talazoparib left-shifted the functional consequences of PARP trapping (S-phase arrest, apoptosis, S-phase double-stranded breaks) and reduced cell viability/growth in TK6 and DU145 cell lines at ≤ tC avg , whereas the other inhibitors required high-dose TMZ. Our study suggests structural differences across PARPi may contribute to differences in PARP selectivity and off-target activities, which along with distinct pharmacokinetic properties, may influence inhibitor-specific toxicities in patients.

Genotoxicity testing guidelines require the assessment of the clastogenic and aneugenic potential of compounds. While in vitro micronucleus assays detect both types of endpoints, it requires labor-intensive microscopic scoring and does not discriminate between the two modes of actions. Here, we present a novel high-content imaging platform in A375 human cells that addresses the need for rapid scoring while providing additional mechanistic information. We evaluated the new platform with 12 compounds, three compounds from each mechanistic class (clastogen, aneugen tubulin binder, aneugen aurora inhibitor, and nongenotoxicant) following 4- and 24-h compound treatments. The approach we developed is first discriminating between genotoxicant and nongenotoxicant using an image analysis algorithm to quantify micronucleus induction below a 60% cytotoxicity cutoff. Then it uses centromere protein A (CENPA) staining for the genotoxic compounds to discriminate between aneugens and clastogens. Lastly, we use phosphorylated histone H2AX Ser139 (γH2AX) staining to confirm clastogenicity and changes in phosphorylated histone 3 Ser10 (pH 3) and increases in polyploidy in mitotic cells to discriminate between aneugens that bind tubulin from those that affect aurora kinases. All compounds were correctly classified, and we showed by using benchmark dose-response analysis that the imaging platform in A375 cells is at least as sensitive as the MicroFlow® assay in TK6 cells for genotoxicant but appears to be more specific for the nongenotoxicants. A detailed comparison of the cell lines and a more comprehensive validation with a much larger compound set, predictive and dose-response modeling will be presented in the future., (© 2022 Environmental Mutagen Society.)

Risk management of in vitro aneugens for topically applied compounds is not clearly defined because there is no validated methodology to accurately measure compound concentration in proliferating stratum basale keratinocytes of the skin. Here, we experimentally tested several known aneugens in the EpiDerm reconstructed human skin in vitro micronucleus assay and compared the results to flow cytometric mechanistic biomarkers (phospho-H3; MPM2, DNA content). We then evaluated similar biomarkers (Ki-67, nuclear area) using immunohistochemistry in skin sections of minipigs following topical exposure the potent aneugens, colchicine, and hesperadin. Data from the EpiDerm model showed positive micronucleus responses for all aneugens tested following topical or direct media dosing with similar sensitivity when adjusted for applied dose. Quantitative benchmark dose-response analysis exhibited increases in the mitotic index biomarkers phospho-H3 and MPM2 for tubulin binders and polyploidy for aurora kinase inhibitors are at least as sensitive as the micronucleus endpoint. By comparison, the aneugens tested did not induce histopathological changes, increases in Ki-67 immunolabeling or nuclear area in skin sections from the in vivo minipig study at doses in significant excess of those eliciting a response in vitro. Results indicate the EpiDerm in vitro micronucleus assay is suitable for the hazard identification of aneugens. The lack of response in the minipig studies indicates that the barrier function of the minipig skin, which is comparable to human skin, protects from the effects of aneugens in vivo. These results provide a basis for conducting additional studies in the future to further refine this understanding., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

As the number of cancer survivors continues to grow, awareness of long-term toxicities and impact on quality of life after chemotherapy treatment in cancer survivors has intensified. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common side effects of modern chemotherapy. Animal models are used to study peripheral neuropathy and predict human risk; however, such models are labor-intensive and limited translatability between species has become a major challenge. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying CIPN have not been precisely determined and few human neuronal models to study CIPN exist. Here, we have developed a high-throughput drug-induced neurotoxicity screening model using human iPSC-derived peripheral-like neurons to study the effect of chemotherapy agents on neuronal health and morphology using high content imaging measurements (neurite length and neuronal cell viability). We utilized this model to test various classes of chemotherapeutic agents with known clinical liability to cause peripheral neuropathy such as platinum agents, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-angiogenic compounds. The model was sensitive to compounds that cause interference in microtubule dynamics, especially the taxane, epothilone, and vinca alkaloids. Conversely, the model was not sensitive to platinum and anti-angiogenic chemotherapeutics; compounds that are not reported to act directly on neuronal processes. In summary, we believe this model has utility for high-throughput screening and prediction of human risk for CIPN for novel chemotherapeutics., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Chromosomal rearrangements, including DNA deletions are involved in carcinogenesis. The deletion (DEL) assay scoring for DNA deletions in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is able to detect a wide range of carcinogens. Among approximately 60 compounds of known carcinogenic activity, the DEL assay detected 86% correctly whereas the Ames Salmonella assay detected only 30% correctly [R.J. Brennan, R.H. Schiestl, Detecting carcinogens with the yeast DEL assay, Methods Mol. Biol. 262 (2004) 111-124]. Since the DEL assay is highly inducible by DNA double strand breaks, this study examined the utility of the DEL assay for detecting clastogens. Ten model compounds, with varied mechanisms of genotoxicity, were examined for their effect on the frequency of DNA deletions with the DEL assay. The compounds tested were: actinomycin D, camptothecin, methotrexate and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine, which are anticancer agents, noscapine and furosemide are therapeutics, acridine, methyl acrylate and resorcinol are industrial chemicals and diazinon is an insecticide. The in vitro micronucleus assay (IVMN) in CHO cells, a commonly used tool for detection of clastogens, was performed on the same compounds and the results of the two assays were compared. The results of our study show that there is 70% concordance in the presence of metabolic activation (rat liver S9) and 80% concordance in the absence of metabolic activation between the DEL assay and the standard in vitro micronucleus assay. The lack of cytotoxicity observed for four of the ten compounds examined indicates limited diffusion of lipophilic compounds across the yeast cell wall. Thus, the development of a more permeable yeast tester strain is expected to greatly improve concordance of the DEL assay with the IVMN assay. The yeast DEL assay is inexpensive, amenable to automation and requires less expertise to perform than the IVMN. Thus, it has a strong potential as a robust, fast and economical screen for detecting clastogens in vitro.

Genotoxic stress triggers a variety of biological responses including the transcriptional activation of genes regulating DNA repair, cell survival and cell death. Here, we investigated whether gene expression profiles can differentiate between DNA reactive and DNA non-reactive mechanisms of genotoxicity. We analyzed gene expression profiles and micronucleus levels in L5178Y cells treated with cisplatin and sodium chloride. The assessment of cisplatin genotoxicity (up to six-fold increase in the number of micronuclei) and gene expression profile (increased expression of genotoxic stress-associated genes) was in agreement with cisplatin mode of action as a DNA adduct-forming agent. The gene expression profile analysis of cisplatin-treated cells identified a number of genes with robust up regulation of mRNA expression including genes associated with DNA damage (i.e. members of GADD45 family), early response (i.e. cFOS), and heat shock protein (i.e. HSP40 homologue). The gene expression changes correlated well with DNA damage as measured by DNA-protein crosslinks and platinum-DNA binding. To differentiate the genotoxic stress-associated expression profile of cisplatin from a general toxic stress, we have compared the gene expression profile of cisplatin-treated cells to cells treated with sodium chloride, which causes osmotic shock and cell lysis. Although the sodium chloride treatment caused a two-fold induction of micronuclei, the gene expression profile at equitoxic concentrations was remarkably distinct from the profile observed with cisplatin. The profile of sodium chloride featured a complete lack of expression changes in genes associated with DNA damage and repair. In summary, the gene expression profiles clearly distinguished between DNA reactive and non-reactive genotoxic mechanisms of cisplatin and sodium chloride. Our results suggest the potential utility of gene expression profile analysis for elucidating mechanism of action of genotoxic agents.