Search

Virginia Bellido,1 Natalia Duque,2 Rachel S Newson,3 Esther Artime,2 Erik Spaepen,4 Miriam Rubio de Santos,2 Jennifer Redondo-Antón,2 Silvia Díaz-Cerezo,2 Jorge Navarro5 1Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; 2Medical Department, Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly and Company, Madrid, Spain; 3NAPAC Real World Evidence, Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly and Company, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 4Statistics, HaaPACS GmbH, Schriesheim, Germany; 5Department of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, SpainCorrespondence: Natalia Duque, Eli Lilly and Company, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain, Email duque_natalia@lilly.comBackground: This study aimed to determine physicians’ perceptions of the extent of suboptimal insulin dosing and the barriers and solutions to optimal dosing in people with diabetes (PwD) treated with insulin.Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in four countries with primary care physicians and endocrinologists treating PwD using insulin pens, which included 53 questions on physicians’ characteristics and their perceptions of the behaviors of PwD in relation to insulin dosing routines, unmet needs and potential solutions. Analyses were descriptive.Results: Of the 160 physicians (80 primary care physicians, 80 specialists) surveyed in Spain, 58.1% were male and 88.8% had been qualified to practice for more than five years. Most physicians (> 65%) indicated that 0– 30% of PwD missed or skipped, mistimed, or miscalculated an insulin dose in the last 30 days. Common reasons for these actions were that PwD forgot, were out of their normal routine, were too busy or distracted, or were unsure of how much insulin to take. To optimize insulin dosing, over 75% of physicians considered it very helpful for PwD to have real-time insulin dosing calculation guidance, mobile app reminders, a device automatically recording glucose measurements and/or insulin, having insulin and glucose data in one place, and having the time for more meaningful conversations about insulin dosing routines.Conclusion: According to physicians’ perspectives, suboptimal insulin dosing remains common among PwD. This survey highlights the need for integrated and automated insulin dosing support to manage the complexity of insulin treatment, improve communications between PwD and physicians, and ultimately improve outcomes for PwD.Plain Language Summary: In Spain, more than 50% of people with diabetes (PwD) do not reach glycemic targets (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1C] under 7%). While there are many innovations in insulin therapy and device technology, treatment adherence is often poor.This study presents results from an online survey of physicians’ perceptions of insulin dosing and the barriers and solutions to optimal insulin dosing in Spain. Most physicians indicated that PwD missed or skipped, mistimed, or miscalculated an insulin dose. Common reasons included PwD being out of their normal routine, being too busy or distracted, or being unsure of how much insulin to take. To improve insulin dosing, physicians suggested real-time insulin dosing calculation guidance, mobile app reminders, and a device that automatically records glucose measurements and insulin. Furthermore, having time for more meaningful conversations about insulin dosing routines was found as a solution to improve insulin dosing.There is a need for integrated and automated insulin dosing support to manage insulin treatment, improve communications between PwD and physicians, and improve outcomes for PwD.Keywords: diabetes mellitus, type 1 diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin dosing, physicians, Spain, barriers, solutions

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are effective for glycemic control, with many also demonstrating cardiovascular (CV) benefit, in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to find a consensus on the barriers and strategies for the optimal use of GLP-1 RAs in people with T2D and high CV risk or established cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Spain., Methods: A two-round Delphi survey (53 questions) was conducted among members of four national scientific societies in Spain, including physicians experienced in the management of people with T2D. The degree of consensus was evaluated with a 7-point Likert scale, establishing consensus when ≥ 70% of the panelists agreed (6-7) or disagreed (1-2)., Results: A total of 97 physicians participated in the first round (endocrinology: 34%, family and community medicine: 21%, internal medicine: 23%, and cardiology: 23%), and 96 in the second round. The main barriers identified were: therapeutic inertia and late use of GLP-1 RAs; lack of a comprehensive approach to CV risk; lack of knowledge on the usefulness of GLP-1 RAs in CVD prevention and treatment; and economic/administrative barriers. Strategies with a highest consensus included: the need to establish simple protocols that integrate awareness of CV risk monitoring; training professionals and patients; and the use of new technologies., Conclusion: Physicians identified clinical, healthcare, and economic/administrative barriers that limit the use of GLP-1 RAs in people with T2D and high CV risk or established CVD in Spain, highlighting the importance of integrating these therapies according to clinical practice guidelines., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices allow for 24-h real-time measurement of interstitial glucose levels and have changed the interaction between people with diabetes and their health care providers. The large amount of data generated by CGM can be analyzed and evaluated using a set of standardized parameters, collectively named glucometrics. This review aims to provide a summary of the existing evidence on the use of glucometrics data and its impact on clinical practice based on published studies involving adults and children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Spain., Methods: The PubMed and MEDES (Spanish Medical literature) databases were searched covering the years 2018-2022 and including clinical and observational studies, consensus guidelines, and meta-analyses on CGM and glucometrics conducted in Spain., Results: A total of 16 observational studies were found on the use of CGM in Spain, which have shown that cases of severe hypoglycemia in children with T1D were greatly reduced after the introduction of CGM, resulting in a significant reduction in costs. Real-world data from Spain shows that CGM is associated with improved glycemic markers (increased time in range, reduced time below and above range, and glycemic variability), and that there is a relationship between glycemic variability and hypoglycemia. Also, CGM and analysis of glucometrics proved highly useful during the COVID-19 pandemic. New glucometrics, such as the glycemic risk index, or new mathematical approaches to the analysis of CGM-derived glucose data, such as "glucodensities," could help patients to achieve better glycemic control in the future., Conclusion: By using glucometrics in clinical practice, clinicians can better assess glycemic control and a patient's individual response to treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Tirzepatide is a novel antidiabetic medication a single-molecule, agonist to the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors. It is approved in the USA and EU for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Due to the potential novelty represented by incorporating tirzepatide to clinical practice, we aim to review practical aspects of tirzepatide use in T2DM and the supporting scientific evidence. A group of ten endocrinologists involved as investigators in the phase 3 SURPASS clinical trial program followed a nominal group technique, a qualitative research methodology designed as a semi-structured group discussion to reach a consensus on the selection of a set of practical aspects. The scientific evidence for tirzepatide has been reviewed with respect to a number of patients' clinical profiles and care goals. Information of interest related to adverse events, special warnings and precautions, and other considerations for tirzepatide use has been included. Finally, information provided to the patients has been summarized. The practical aspects reported herein may be helpful in guiding physicians in the use of tirzepatide and contribute to optimizing the management of T2DM., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Poor metabolic control and excess body weight are frequently present in people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D)., Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify observational studies reporting clinical, economic, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes associated with poor metabolic (according to HbA1c, blood pressure [BP] and low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] levels) and/or weight control (defined by a body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ) in adults with T2D in Spain, including articles published in either Spanish or English between 2013 and 2022 and conference abstracts from the last 2 years., Results: Nine observational studies were included in the analysis. Poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%) was associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), increased requirements for antidiabetic medications, higher and more frequent weight gain, a greater probability of hypoglycemia and dyslipidemia, and worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Uncontrolled BP in PwT2D was related with the presence of CVD, worse metabolic control, and higher BMI and abdominal perimeter values. Poor LDL-C control or dyslipidemia was associated with CVD, hypoglycemia, and elevated HbA1c and triglycerides levels. The presence of a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 was related to CVD and hypoglycemia, a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome and worse BP control. Direct medical costs were found to be higher in PwT2D when coexisting with HbA1c levels ≥ 7%, uncontrolled BP or obesity. Increased total costs, including productivity losses, were also detected in those who presented uncontrolled BP and a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 , and when poor weight control existed together with HbA1c ≥ 8% and poorly controlled BP., Conclusion: Gathered evidence supports the high clinical, economic and HRQoL burden of poor metabolic and/or weight control in PwT2D in Spain and reinforces the importance of prioritizing its control to reduce the associated burden, at both the individual and healthcare system levels., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Early and intensive treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been associated with lower risk of diabetes-related complications. Control of overweight and obesity, which are strongly associated with T2D and many of its complications, is also key in the management of the disease. New therapies allow for individualised glycaemic control targets with greater safety. Thus, in patients with a higher cardiovascular and renal risk profile, current guidelines encourage early treatment with metformin together with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors with proven cardiovascular benefit. GLP-1 RAs combine highly efficacious glucose-lowering activity with a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia. Recently, tirzepatide, a first-in-class drug that activates both glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and GLP-1 receptors, has demonstrated very high efficacy in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight reduction in clinical trials. Tirzepatide has the potential to help people with T2D reach recommended glycaemic and weight targets (HbA1c < 7% and > 5% weight reduction) and to allow some patients to reach HbA1c measurements close to normal physiological levels and substantial weight reduction. In 2022, tirzepatide was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for treatment of people with T2D and is currently in development for chronic weight management., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are a class of drugs with potent glucose-lowering activity. Additionally, some GLP-1 RAs have demonstrated cardiovascular and renal benefits. Current guidelines recommend their use in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high risk of or with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), regardless of glycaemic control, with lifestyle modification and metformin. However, several studies have recently highlighted the limited number of patients with T2D benefiting from these medications worldwide. Given the huge burden of CVD among patients with T2D, efforts should be made to bring clinical practice closer to expert guidelines. This review describes the current situation of GLP-1 RA use in Spain and the reasons behind the gap between guidelines and real-world practice and suggests possible solutions. Administrative issues, lack of awareness of the cardiovascular benefits, clinical inertia, rejection of injectable medication and costs could be some of the reasons for the current situation. Possible strategies that could help to close the gap include encouraging a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of diabetes which involves cardiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, primary care providers and pharmacists; improved awareness of comorbidities and earlier evaluation and treatment or risks; and better education of healthcare providers regarding the cardioprotective benefits of these drugs., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The REPRESENT study aims to examine whether participants enrolled in glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) LEADER (liraglutide), REWIND (dulaglutide), and SUSTAIN-6 (injectable semaglutide) are representative of the Spanish population with type 2 diabetes (T2D)., Methods: This retrospective observational study used the IQVIA Electronic Medical Records database in Spain to identify adults aged 18 years and older with T2D diagnosed before/between January 2013 and December 2015. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed descriptively. The proportions of individuals in the Spanish cohort who met the key selection criteria of each CVOT were calculated from individuals with available database entries for estimated glomerular filtration rate and body mass index using proxies., Results: A total of 24,268 adults with T2D were identified from the IQVIA database. The Spanish cohort was predominantly male (55.5%) and had a mean (± SD) age of 66.8 ± 12.5 years and HbA1c of 7.2 ± 1.5%, with 14.0% having established cardiovascular disease and 2.9% having prior myocardial infarction. The characteristics of the Spanish cohort were more similar to that of REWIND than LEADER or SUSTAIN-6. The proportions of subjects in the Spanish cohort who met the CVOTs key selection criteria were 10.1% for LEADER, 53.6% for REWIND, and 10.4% for SUSTAIN-6., Conclusions: Although none of the CVOTs was fully representative of the Spanish cohort, the REWIND population was found to be more representative of the real-world Spanish population with T2D than those of LEADER and SUSTAIN-6. These findings reinforce the applicability of the results of REWIND in clinical practice., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Insulin lispro 200 U/ml (IL200) is a rapid-acting concentrated insulin used for the treatment of adults with diabetes requiring daily doses of > 20 units of rapid-acting insulin. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical/demographic and treatment characteristics of patients who initiated insulin IL200 therapy in Spain in a real-world setting (PROFILE-IL200)., Methods: This retrospective observational study based on the IQVIA database included adult (≥ 18 years) patients with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 (T2D) diabetes who initiated IL200 between June 2015 and December 2019. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed descriptively., Results: Main characteristics for the T1D/T2D groups (N = 65/167) were as follows: male, 63.1/55.7%; mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, 46.5 (15.5)/62.6 (12.8) years; time since first diabetes record, 6.6 (4.2)/7.9 (2.9) years; body mass index (BMI), 30.9 (5.8)/33.1 (5.5) kg/m 2 ; glycated hemoglobin, 8.3 (2.1)/8.8 (1.8)%; and diabetes-associated comorbidity, 55.4/92.8%. Among patients with T1D/T2D and a prior diagnosis (N = 54/164), 96.3/90.2% had received previous insulin (rapid insulin in 81.5/62.2%), and 13.0/97.6% had received previous noninsulin antihyperglycemic therapy. The mean (SD) total insulin dose before IL200 initiation for T1D/T2D was 98.0 (73.9)/95.2 (59.8) U/day; IL200 was initiated at a dose of 56.3 (43.8)/51.5 (34.3) U/day, with basal insulin in 86.2/83.2% of the patients. IL200 was first prescribed by an endocrinologist or a primary care physician in 48.7% and 46.6% of patients, respectively., Conclusions: PROFILE-IL200 described the profile of patients treated with IL200 in clinical practice in Spain. Patients were middle-aged, with poor glycemic control, high BMI and associated comorbidities, and received high doses of insulin at IL200 initiation., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Severe hypoglycemic events (SHE) represent a clinical and economic burden in patients with diabetes. Nasal glucagon (NG) is a novel treatment for SHEs with similar efficacy, but with a usability advantage over injectable glucagon (IG) that may translate to improved economic outcomes. The economic implications of this usability advantage on SHE-related spending in Spain were explored in this analysis., Methods: A cost-offset and budget impact analysis (BIA) was conducted using a decision tree model, adapted for the Spanish setting. The model calculated average costs per SHE over the SHE treatment pathway following a treatment attempt with IG or NG. Analyses were performed separately in three populations with insulin-treated diabetes: children and adolescents (4-17 years) with type 1 diabetes (T1D), adults with T1D and adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with respective population estimates applied in BIA. Treatment probabilities were assumed to be equal for IG and NG, except for treatment success following glucagon administration. Epidemiologic and cost data were obtained from Spanish-specific sources. BIA results were presented at a 3-year time horizon., Results: On a per SHE level, NG was associated with lower costs compared to IG (children and adolescents with T1D, EUR 820; adults with T1D, EUR 804; adults with T2D, EUR 725). Lower costs were attributed to reduced costs of professional medical assistance in patients treated with NG. After 3 years, BIA showed that relative to IG, the introduction of NG was projected to reduce SHE-related spending by EUR 1,158,969, EUR 142,162,371, and EUR 6,542,585 in children and adolescents with T1D, adults with T1D, and adults with insulin-treated T2D, respectively., Conclusions: In Spain, the usability advantage of NG over IG translates to potential cost savings per SHE in three populations with insulin-treated diabetes, and the introduction of NG was associated with a lower budget impact versus IG in each group., (© 2022. The Author(s).)