Search

Background This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of autologous skin cell suspensions (ASCS) on the re-epithelialization of partial thickness burn injuries and skin graft donor site wounds. Methods Four databases (EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Web of Science), grey literature and select journal hand-searching identified studies from 1975 - 2020. Randomized trials evaluating partial thickness burn management with non-cultured ASCS compared to any other intervention were included. Time to re-epithelialization (TTRE) was the primary outcome. Three independent researchers completed screening, data extraction and certainty of evidence assessment using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results Five trials (n = 347) reported on adults (2 trials) and children (1 trial) with burn wounds, and adults with donor site wounds (2 trials). The effect of ASCS compared to control on TTRE in adult burn wounds was not estimable. TTRE was shorter in pediatric burn wounds (SMD -1.75 [95% CI: -3.45 to -0.05]) and adult donor site wounds (SMD-5.71 [95% CI: -10.61 to-0.81]) treated with ASCS. The certainty of evidence was very low. Conclusion Compared to standard care, ACSC may reduce pediatric partial thickness burn wound and adult split-thickness skin graft donor site TTRE. Registration PROSPERO CRD42019133171

Introduction: An escharotomy is an effective surgical procedure for the rapid decompression of a constricting and unyielding eschar, to permit restoration of blood flow. However, an escharotomy is also a full-thickness incision, which adds additional scarring to the burn injury area. The cosmetic and functional morbidity of escharotomy scarring in children is poorly characterised. Methods: Children who required a burn wound escharotomy at the Queensland Children's Hospital (QCH) between May 2011 and May 2020 were included. Demographics of these children were described. In addition, the number of operations for revision of escharotomy scars was recorded as an indicator of functional or cosmetic concern. Results: A total of 19 patients required an escharotomy after a burn injury. Children with 1% to 96% TBSA burns required an escharotomy, with a median of 28% (IQR 10–39%) TBSA. Two patients (81% and 96% TBSA) died. Seventy-one percent (12/17) of survivors had operative revisions of their escharotomy scars. The median time from burn to first scar intervention was 35 weeks (IQR 19–70 weeks). Conclusion: There is substantial morbidity associated with escharotomies in children. Further investigation of the current methods of decompression after burn injury, and the long-term morbidity of escharotomy, is required.

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes for children with burns by accelerating wound re-epithelialisation. Its effects on healthcare costs, however, remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NPWT from a healthcare provider perspective using evidence from the SONATA in C randomised controlled trial, in which 101 children with small-area burns were allocated to either standard care (silver-impregnated dressings) or standard care in combination with adjunctive NPWT. The primary outcome, time to re-epithelialisation, was assessed through a blinded photographic review. Resource usage and costs were prospectively recorded for each participant for up to 6 months. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and dominance probabilities were estimated and uncertainty quantified using bootstrap resampling. Mean costs per participant—including dressings, labour, medication, scar management, and theatre operations—were lower in the NPWT group (AUD $903.69) relative to the control group (AUD $1669.01). There was an 89% probability that NPWT was dominant, yielding both faster re-epithelialisation and lower overall costs. Findings remained robust to sensitivity analyses employing alternative theatre costs and time-to-re-epithelialisation estimates for grafted patients. In conclusion, adjunctive NPWT is likely to be a cost-effective and dominant treatment for small-area paediatric burns (ANZCTR.org.au:ACTRN12618000256279).

IntroductionNegative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in acute burn care may decrease the time to re-epithelialisation by more than 20%. Despite this, the perceived burden of use; including therapeutic, physical and financial, have limited the use of NPWT in acute burn care. This might be minimised by using the small, ultraportable, single-use NPWT device PICO as opposed to larger devices, which to date has never been studied in acute burn care. This research will; therefore, primarily assess the feasibility, acceptability and safety of PICO in paediatric burns. Secondary outcomes include time to re-epithelialisation, pain, itch, cost and scar formation.Methods and analysisThis protocol details a clinical trial methodology and is pre-results. This single site, prospective, pilot randomised controlled trial will be conducted in an Australian quaternary paediatric burns centre. Participants must be aged ≤16 years, otherwise well and managed within 24 hours of sustaining a burn that fits beneath a PICO dressing. Thirty participants will be randomised to one of three groups: group A: Mepitel and ACTICOAT, group B: Mepitel, ACTICOAT and PICO and group C: Mepitel, ACTICOAT Flex and PICO. Patient outcomes will be recorded at each dressing change to assess efficacy and safety outcomes until 3 months postburn wound re-epithelialisation. Surveys, randomisation and data storage will be undertaken via online platforms and physical data storage collated at the Centre for Children’s Health Research, Brisbane, Australia. Analysis will be done by using StataSE 17.0 statistical software.Ethics and disseminationEthics has been obtained from Queensland Health and Griffith Human Research Ethics committees including a site-specific approval. These data will be disseminated via clinical meetings, conference presentations and peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberACTRN12622000009718.

Appropriate pain management for children who have experienced an acute burn injury is critical to improve patient outcomes and reduce potential morbidities. With 60% of our patients being under the age of 4 years, pain management is crucial in reducing pain and anxiety in both patients and parents. It is imperative that appropriate pain relief is commenced from initial contact with healthcare workers as this will affect the success or failure of future wound procedures. Uncontrolled pain can negatively affect a patient, both short and long term. It may cause anticipatory anxiety for future medical procedures, increased pain and anxiety can decrease wound re-epithelialization which can lead to long-term consequences for growth and mobility, and increased pain can also influence the possibility of patients and families displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder. Pain management in the form of pharmaceuticals is imperative during burn wound treatment and should incorporate pain relief targeted at both background and procedural pain. It also requires a multimodal, individualized, and targeted approach combining both pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical techniques, including cold running water, multimodal distraction devices, hypnotherapy, and bubbles. We discuss the research and knowledge that our center has gained through treating pediatric patients with burns over the last 20 years.

Negative pressure wound therapy has been used to promote wound healing in a variety of settings, including as an adjunct to silver-impregnated dressings in the acute management of paediatric burns. Fluid aspirated by the negative pressure wound therapy system represents a potentially insightful research matrix for understanding the burn wound microenvironment and the intervention's biochemical mechanisms of action. The aim of this study was to characterize the proteome of wound fluid collected using negative pressure wound therapy from children with small-area thermal burns. Samples were obtained as part of a randomized controlled trial investigating the clinical efficacy of adjunctive negative pressure wound therapy. They were compared with blister fluid specimens from paediatric burn patients matched according to demographic and injury characteristics. Protein identification and quantification were performed via liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra data-independent acquisition. Proteins and biological pathways that were unique to or enriched in negative pressure wound therapy fluid samples were evaluated using principal components, partial least squares-discriminant, and gene ontology enrichment analyses. Eight viable samples of negative pressure wound therapy fluid were collected and analyzed with eight matched blister fluid samples. A total of 502 proteins were quantitatively profiled in the negative pressure wound therapy fluid, of which 444 (88.4%) were shared with blister fluid. Several proteins exhibited significant abundance differences between fluid types, with negative pressure wound therapy fluid showing a higher abundance of matrix metalloproteinase-9, arginase-1, low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III-A, filamin-A, alpha-2-macroglobulin, and hemoglobin subunit alpha. The results lend support to the hypothesis that negative pressure wound therapy augments wound healing through the modulation of factors involved in the inflammatory response, granulation tissue synthesis, and extracellular matrix maintenance. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD023168.

IntroductionThere is an absence of evidence regarding predictors of moderate to severe pain in children undergoing acute burn treatment. This investigation aimed to determine if relationships existed between patient and clinical characteristics, and pain at first dressing change for children with acute burn injuries.MethodsA retrospective cohort investigation was conducted using clinical data from pediatric burn patients treated at the Queensland Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. Data extracted included patient and burn characteristics, first aid, and follow-up care. Observational pain scores were categorized into three groups (mild, moderate, and severe pain), and bivariate and multivariable relationships were examined using proportional odds ordinal logistic regression. Data from 2013 pediatric burns patients were extracted from the database.ResultsFactors associated with increased odds of procedural pain included: hand burns (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.1, pDiscussionIt is recommended that patients presenting with one or more of the aforementioned factors are identified before their first dressing change, so additional pain control methods can be implemented.

Background The efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the acute management of burns remains unclear. The purpose of this trial was to compare standard Acticoat™ and Mepitel™ dressings with combined Acticoat™, Mepitel™ and continuous NPWT to determine the effect of adjunctive NPWT on re‐epithelialization in paediatric burns. Methods This two‐arm, single‐centre RCT recruited children with acute thermal burns covering less than 5 per cent of their total body surface area. The primary outcome was time to re‐epithelialization. Blinded assessments were performed using photographs captured every 3–5 days until discharge. Secondary measures included pain, itch, grafting, perfusion and scar management referrals. Results Some 114 patients were randomized. Median time to re‐epithelialization was 8 (i.q.r. 7–11) days in the NPWT group and 10 (8–14) days in the control group. In a multivariable model, NPWT decreased the expected time to wound closure by 22 (95 per cent c.i. 7 to 34) per cent (P = 0·005). The risk of referral to scar management was reduced by 60 (18 to 81) per cent (P = 0·013). Four participants in the control group and one in the NPWT group underwent grafting. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in pain, itch or laser Doppler measures of perfusion. Adverse events were rare and minor, although NPWT carried a moderate treatment burden, with ten patients discontinuing early. Conclusion Adjunctive NPWT hastened re‐epithelialization in small‐area burn injuries in children, but had a greater treatment burden than standard dressings alone. Registration number: ACTRN12618000256279 ( http://ANZCTR.org.au)., In this RCT, children with small‐area thermal burns were randomized to standard silver‐impregnated dressings or standard dressings in conjunction with continuous negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Adjunctive NPWT decreased time to re‐epithelialization, with attendant improvements in dressing change requirements and scar management referrals. There were no statistically significant differences in pain, itch, or laser Doppler measures of perfusion. Negative pressure wound therapy hastens epithelialization

Aim: Children's burns care in Australasia is performed by paediatric surgeons and by plastic surgeons. The aim was to determine practices regarding the donor site wound (DSW), and to explore any differences by training scheme or nature of unit (paediatric vs. mixed). Methods: Online survey of Australasian burns surgeons. Results: Forty surgeons responded. 23/40 paediatric surgeons, 23/40 worked in a stand-alone children's burns unit. All used powered dermatomes. Alginates were the most common DSW dressing. Idealised dressings favour patient factors over cost. Plastic, and mixed-practice, surgeons use a broader range of dermatome settings in children >1 year. Mixed practice surgeons use thicker settings. All surgeons see pain as a common DSW problem. Paediatric surgeons recognise itch as a problem. Conclusions: While there are differences related to training scheme and the mix of patients being treated, there is a broader commonality of practice.

Background Adoption of responsive trauma-informed practices by staff in hospital-based paediatric care may help mitigate downstream costs associated with treatment delivery due to reduced pain and distress for children and care providers, improved health-related quality of life and increased satisfaction with care. A web-based education intervention (termed Responsive CARE) was developed to build self-efficacy of staff in a paediatric medical setting. This protocol paper describes a feasibility study (including preliminary effectiveness) of the implementation of Responsive CARE in a tertiary, outpatient burn clinical setting. Methods A pre-post, mixed methods design will be employed. Children and caregivers attending hospital for change of burn wound dressings or burn scar management during the 3-month control or 3-month intervention period will be eligible, with follow-up to 6-months post-baseline. All children and caregiver/s will receive “standard care” including burn interventions focused on wound healing, scar management, itch management (both pharmacological and non-pharmacological), counselling, age-appropriate procedural support and burn rehabilitation. Health professional participants will be those involved in the management of children with burns during the study period or their senior managers. Health professional participants who attend a weekly educational clinical meeting will be invited to complete the intervention during a 1-month timeframe between the control and intervention period (or upon their commencement in burn outpatients during the intervention period) using an individualised log-in process. A purposive sample of caregivers and health professionals will be sought for participation in semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data will be analysed using Framework analysis. Feasibility will be evaluated via interviews, digital records of intervention usage and technical assistance logs. The primary outcome measures of effectiveness (pain, itch and distress) will be measured using self-report or behavioural observation. Quantitative data will primarily be analysed descriptively and using generalised linear models. Discussion This study will provide insights into factors that impact upon the feasibility of a web-based trauma-informed care education intervention in a clinical practice setting. This knowledge may support other education approaches within healthcare settings related to improving and supporting patients to reduce the risk of healthcare interactions that result in paediatric medical traumatic stress.

Living with a visible difference (e.g., disfigurement) can compromise a child's psychological wellbeing. Although some children can adjust well, others can develop a range of appearance-related issues such as social anxiety, low self-esteem, and body dissatisfaction. However, current research fails to confirm what factors contribute to appearance-related distress, and what factors buffer the consequences of living with a visible difference. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 Australian specialist health professionals who care for children with visible differences. Interviews explored the type of appearance-related psychosocial concerns presented to a pediatric hospital, perspectives on the impact of appearance-related distress, as well as factors and processes that health professionals perceive influence adjustment. Data were subjected to inductive thematic analysis. Rich evidence was offered by health professionals, which demonstrated deep understanding of the psychological wellbeing of their patients. Three themes were identified: Mind, Body, and Soul; Stages of Life; and Individual Differences. Findings highlighted the complexity of appearance-related distress, with individual differences in adjustment, and the powerful impact it can have on a child's short and long-term psychosocial wellbeing. The importance of reaching consensus in the conceptualisation and measurement of psychological wellbeing is stressed, and key domains associated with adjustment are proposed.

Background Paediatric burns are highly painful and traumatising injuries that are overrepresented among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Paediatric burn patients’ pain remains poorly managed by pharmacological interventions, leading to increased anxiety, distress, and trauma in patients and their caregivers. Non-pharmacological psychosocial interventions have been suggested as effective in reducing pain and psychological morbidities among paediatric burn patients and their caregivers; however, their degree of effectiveness and appropriateness for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people is unclear. Methods A non-date restricted systematic review was conducted through four databases. Studies published in English assessing psychosocial interventions on paediatric burn patients’ physical pain along with theirs and/or their caregiver’s anxiety, distress, or trauma symptoms were identified and included in this review. Included studies were assessed for their ability to reduce one of the outcomes of interests and for their reflection of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ perspectives of health. Results Of the 3178 identified references, 17 were eligible. These include distraction based techniques (n = 8), hypnosis/familiar imagery (n = 2), therapeutic approaches (n = 4), and patient preparation/procedural control (n = 3). Distraction techniques incorporating procedural preparation reduced pain, while discharge preparation and increased ‘patient control’ reduced patient and caregiver anxiety; and internet based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy reduced short-term but not long-term post-traumatic stress symptoms. No interventions reflected Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ perspectives of health; and few targeted caregivers or focused on reducing their symptoms. Conclusions The development and assessment of psychosocial interventions to appropriately meet the needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander paediatric burn patients is required.

Background Rotational thrombo-elastometry (ROTEM®) is a point-of-care coagulation test. Reference ranges in non-labouring women have recently been established from a cohort of women presenting for elective caesarean delivery using the recommended minimum sample size of 120. This study aimed to present baseline parameters for labouring and non-labouring women and to compare the mean values of these ROTEM® parameters. Methods Ethical approval was granted for an opt-out recruitment approach for labouring women and written consent was obtained from non-labouring women (data published previously). ROTEM® testing was performed in these two cohorts at term gestation. Women with any condition affecting coagulation were excluded. ROTEM® Delta reference ranges were derived by calculating the 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles for INTEM/EXTEM/FIBTEM amplitude at 5 minutes (A5), coagulation time (CT), maximum clot firmness (MCF) and clot formation time (CFT). Results One hundred and twenty-one labouring and 132 non-labouring women met inclusion criteria. The mean values for selected ROTEM® parameters for labouring and non-labouring women respectively were: FIBTEM A5, 21.05 and 19.7 mm (P=0.008); EXTEM A5, 54.8 and 53.2 mm (P=0.025); and EXTEM CT, 52.2 and 53.7 s (P=0.049). Significant differences between the groups were observed in measures of clotting onset and clot firmness. Conclusions We demonstrated a significant decrease in the mean time-to-clotting onset in labouring women compared with non-labouring women. Mean values for measures of clot firmness were greater in labouring women. In comparison to previously established ROTEM® baseline parameters for non-labouring women, this study provides evidence that there is greater hypercoagulability in labouring women.

Background Young children are at particular risk for injury. Ten per cent to twenty-five per cent develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, no empirically supported preventive interventions exist. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy of a standardised targeted preventive intervention for PTSD in young injured children. Methods Injured children (1-6 years) were enrolled in a multi-site parallel-group superiority prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) in Australia and Switzerland. Screening for PTSD risk occurred 6-8 days postaccident. Parents of children who screened 'high-risk' were randomised to a 2-session CBT-based intervention or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Primary outcomes were PTSD symptom (PTSS) severity, and secondary outcomes were PTSD diagnosis, functional impairment and behavioural difficulties at 3 and 6 months postinjury using blinded assessments. Trials were registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614000325606) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02088814). Trial status is complete. Results One hundred and thirty-three children screened 'high-risk' were assigned to intervention (n = 62) or TAU (n = 71). Multilevel intention-to-treat analyses revealed a significant intervention effect on PTSS severity over time (b = 60.06, 95% CI: 21.30-98.56). At 3 months, intervention children (M = 11.02, SD = 10.42, range 0-47) showed an accelerated reduction in PTSS severity scores compared to control children (M = 17.30, SD = 13.94, range 0-52; mean difference -6.97, 95% CI: -14.02 to 0.08, p adj. = .055, d = 0.51). On secondary outcomes, multilevel analyses revealed significant treatment effects for PTSD diagnosis, functional impairment and behavioural difficulties. Conclusions This multi-site RCT provides promising preliminary evidence for the efficacy of a targeted preventive intervention for accelerating recovery from PTSS in young injured children. This has important clinical implications for the psychological support provided to young children and parents during the acute period following a single-event trauma.

IntroductionUltrasound is a quick, safe, and non-invasive imaging method that can be used to measure skin thickness in pathological cutaneous conditions in clinical and research settings. Despite widespread use, there exists a lack of standardisation and reporting of ultrasound skin thickness measurement methods, which makes between-studies comparisons difficult. To address this, we present a scoping review protocol, which aims to determine what is and is not known about the measurement of skin and scar thickness using ultrasound in people with traumatic scars.Methods and analysisThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines and Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology will be used to guide this review. Electronic database searching will be conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Web of Science. No date limit will be imposed on the database searches. Records will be supplemented with searches of reference lists of included studies and grey literature in OpenGrey and Google Advanced. Screening will be conducted by two independent reviewers, and studies where ultrasound is used to measure skin and scar thickness in people with traumatic scars will be included. Data extraction will include ultrasound methods (eg, transducer orientation), psychometric properties (eg, reliability, measurement error), health service and implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility, acceptability) and factors influencing ultrasound measurement of skin thickness (eg, body location, age).Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this investigation, as published literature will form the basis of the review. The review will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and is expected to result in the development of the first evidence-based and consensus-based methodological guideline for skin thickness measurement by ultrasound.

Many children and young people struggle adjusting to the psychosocial consequences (e.g., body dissatisfaction, social anxiety, and stigmatisation) of visible differences (or disfigurement). As appearance-affecting conditions often require specialist multidisciplinary team care, health professionals are in a unique position to offer psychosocial support and intervention. However, there is a dearth of literature on how appearance-related concerns are managed in pediatric hospital settings. Sixteen Australian specialist health professionals participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews to address this gap. Interviews explored current appearance-related psychosocial service provision, barriers in accessing appearance-related care, and perceptions of online platforms to deliver specialist support and intervention. Thematic analysis demonstrated four themes: We can do it better, Capability versus availability, Online generation, and Putting appearance on the agenda. This research highlighted the potential value of online platforms to increase accessibility to specialist appearance-related care, the need for more psychosocial resources to be integrated into appearance-related specialities, prioritising the development of low to medium appearance-related support and intervention, increasing the appearance-related knowledge of health professionals and families, and the need for more holistic approaches in routine care.

The management of infants with multiple intestinal atresia and complex gastroschisis can represent a challenge to the paediatric surgeon. This case report presents a neonate with multiple jejunal atresias in which a percutaneous foley catheter tube inserted to just beyond the duodenojejunal flexure was used effectively for bowel decompression, instead of the formation of a proximal stoma. By utilising this technique, the well documented complications associated with proximal stomas were avoided, bowel length was preserved and the need for further surgery in the infant was prevented. The infant remained well at six months with no complications at follow-up.

Introduction Reported advantages of early excision for larger burn injuries include reduced morbidity, mortality, and hospital length of stay for adult burn patients. However, a paucity of evidence supports the best option for paediatric burns and the advantages of non-excisional (mechanical) debridement. This study aims to evaluate the association between early (< 24hours post-injury) non-excisional debridement under general anaesthesia with burn wound re-epithelialisation time and skin graft requirements. Methods A cohort study of children (< 17 years) presenting with burns >5% total body surface area, using prospectively collected state-wide pediatric burns' registry between January 2013 to December 2019. Primary outcomes were: time to reepithelialization (tested using survival analysis) and skin graft requirements, tested using binary logistic regression for odds ratios). Using depth and size, we performed a propensity matched dataset to analyse effects of early non-excisional debridement in the operating theatre. Results Overall, 392 children met eligibility (males 58.2%). When propensity matched, early non-excisional debridement under general anaesthesia in the operating theatre, significantly reduced the time to re-epithelialisation (15.0 (CI: 11.00-20.00) versus 20.0 (CI:13.5 – 31.00) days) and the odds of requiring a skin graft (OR:0.319 (0.125 – 0.812). Conclusions This study is the first to demonstrate that early non-excisional debridement under general anaesthesia in the operating theatre significantly reduces wound re-epithelialisation time and subsequent need for a skin graft in paediatric burn patients. Analysis suggests that ketamine procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department used for burn wound debridement is not an effective substitute for debridement in the operating theatre.

Introduction Best-practice burns first aid is well defined as 20 minutes of cool running water (CRW) within three hours of injury and an expectation of burn care in Australia. This study aims to identify barriers to applying this intervention and assess burn first aid knowledge amongst Australian paramedics. Methods Using multiple methods we assessed; 1) burn first aid adequacy in a cross-sectional study of health care professionals, utilizing a prospectively collected registry of patients managed at an Australian tertiary children’s hospital. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between first aid adequacy between health services (eg. Paramedics and emergency departments). Then 2) paramedics completed a questionnaire containing demographic and clinical expertise and environment as well as recording immediate first aid management across five multiple choice burn case scenarios Results Overall, 31.3% of children received adequate CRW from caregivers. Factors associated with caregiver inadequacy of CRW were very young age and early adolescence (p< 0.001) rural location ( P = 0.045), low socioeconomic status ( P = 0.030) amongst others. Paramedics and general practitioners provided adequate cooling to 184/735 (25.0%) and 52/215 (24.2%) of their patients, respectively. Local general hospitals provided adequate CRW to 1019/1809 (56.3%) patients. Paramedic questionnaire responses (n=326) identified 56% of paramedics answered all burn case scenarios correctly. Respondents who treated a burn within six months scored higher on burn first aid scenarios compared to paramedics who had not recently treated a burn (p=0.004). Conclusions : deficiencies remain in the cooling of paediatric burns patients at all levels of initial management. First aid delivery was significantly worse in children aged 0-2, adolescents aged 15-16, those living rurally, and the socioeconomically disadvantaged.

Background Trauma-informed care includes a range of practices that build a culture of safety, empowerment, and healing. Limited information is available regarding the lived experience of trauma-informed care by healthcare professionals treating burns in a multidisciplinary setting. Objective The primary aim of this study was to understand what ‘trauma-informed care’ means to staff and students working in burns at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Methods Semi-structured interviews and focus group were conducted with healthcare professionals (medical, nursing, allied health, pre-graduate students) working in paediatric burn care (or their line manager). Analysis of dataset was undertaken using qualitative methods (interpretive phenomenological approach and qualitative content analysis). Results Eleven interviews and one focus group were completed and transcribed verbatim. Three superordinate themes were applicable across the five cohorts: ‘what does trauma-informed care mean?’, ‘being able to deliver trauma-informed care’ (agency) and ‘impact of the setting’. Eleven components of trauma-informed care practice (for example, everyday interactions with patients and colleagues, screening and assessment) and service-level approaches (for example, service provider training) were described by participants. Conclusions Healthcare professionals’ experiences of delivering trauma-informed care in a burns centre highlighted the need to clarify the concept of ‘trauma-informed care’ as a first step. Enabling the workforce to understand trauma-informed care and apply it in everyday interactions with patients and colleagues, and a strategic commitment to practice change needs to be actioned more systematically to support implementation of a trauma-informed care approach in pediatric health services.

Background: Reported advantages of early excision and grafting for larger burn injuries include reduced morbidity, mortality, and hospital length of stay for adult burn patients. Evidence to support this has strengthened over the last 50 years. However, a paucity of evidence supports the best option for paediatric burns and, less still, the advantages of non-excisional (mechanical) debridement. Ketamine procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department is a popular alternative to debridement in operating theatres under general anaesthesia. This study aims to evaluate the association between early (Methods: Children younger than 17 years who presented with burns of five percent total body surface area or greater were included in a retrospective cohort study. Data between January 2013 to December 2019 were extracted from a state-wide paediatric burns’ registry for analysis. Time to re-epithelialisation was tested using survival analysis, and binary logistic regression for odds of skin graft requirement. A propensity matched dataset based on depth and size of burn wound, was used to analyse effects of early non-excisional debridement in the operating theatre compared to control. Results: Overall, 392 children met eligibility for the study with a male over-representation of 58.2%. When propensity matched, non-excisional debridement under general anaesthesia in the operating theatre, within 24hours of injury, significantly reduced the time to re-epithelialisation (15.0 (CI: 11.00-20.00) versus 20.0 (CI:13.5 – 31.00) days) and the odds of requiring a skin graft (OR:0.319 (0.125 – 0.812).Conclusion: This study is the first to demonstrate that early, initial, non-incisional debridement under general anaesthesia in the operating theatre significantly reduces wound re-epithelialisation time and subsequent need for a skin graft in paediatric burn patients. Analysis suggests that ketamine procedural sedation in the emergency department used for burn wound debridement is not an effective substitute for debridement in the operating theatre.

AimExtrahepatic biliary atresia is a rare disorder. This creates challenges in the quality and quantity of research conducted. This issue is exacerbated by the potential heterogeneity in the reported outcomes in research examining the management of biliary atresia. A core outcome set is required to standardise reporting on the management of biliary atresia in research, facilitate systematic reviews that include outcomes of greatest importance to patients and clinicians, and to evaluate the quality of the existing evidence base on the management of biliary atresia.MethodsA list of all potential outcomes will be developed through a systematic review of the literature. This list will be refined through a three-stage Delphi approach, involving key stakeholders in the management of biliary atresia. This will include patients and their parents, clinicians, nurses and allied health professionals. In this way, outcomes will be prioritised into a set of consensus core outcomes.ConclusionThe development of a core outcome set in biliary atresia management is needed to guide future research and assist in evaluating the quality of existing research.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been granted by the Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), Ref: HREC/20/QCHQ/62448. Results of the study will be published in an open access format.

Background Kaposiform Haemangioendothelioma (KHE) is a very rare, benign but locally aggressive vascular tumour. Its incidence is 1/100000, and it is most commonly found in the cutaneous tissues of the extremities. Presentation A 6-month-old presented acutely after 2 days of increasing abdominal distension. Apart from distension, clinical examination was unremarkable. An abdominal x-ray demonstrated massive gaseous distension of bowel loops. A contrast enema demonstrated an irregular stenosis within the sigmoid colon. An urgent laparotomy was performed. Management A thick and very inflammatory stricture was resected. Histopathology confirmed this as Kaposiform Haemangioendothelioma with margin involvement. Patient had a complicated post-operative period due to prolonged sepsis resulting in a cardiac arrest and two return journeys to theatre. An MRI brain was performed after patient stabilisation, demonstrating bilateral cerebral infarcts – the patient went on to develop cerebral palsy. Discussion Mainstay management of KHE is primary resection. It is associated with Kasabach-Merritt Phenomenon – a consumptive coagulopathy, which is present in 70% of KHE patients and has an associated 10% mortality rate. Conclusion There are a small number of cases of KHE with gastrointestinal involvement in the literature. A number of these presented with bowel obstruction but no other had such a complicated post-operative course.

Objective: The longer-term effectiveness of silicone and pressure burn scar interventions was evaluated at 12-months postburn. Design: Parallel group, randomised trial. Setting: Hospital outpatient clinics, research centre. Participants: Children referred for burn scar management following grafted or spontaneously healed acute burn injuries or scar reconstruction surgery. Interventions: Participants were randomised to: (1) topical silicone gel only, (2) pressure garment only, or (3) combined topical silicone gel and pressure garment. Main measures: Primary outcomes were scar thickness (blinded ultrasound measurement) and itch intensity (caregiver proxy-report, numeric rating scale). Results: Of 153 participants randomised who received the interventions (silicone n = 51, pressure garment n = 49, combined n = 53), 86 were followed-up at 12-months postburn ( n = 34, n = 28, n = 24). No differences were identified for the primary outcomes using intention-to-treat analysis. Scar thickness mean difference (95% confidence interval) = 0.00 cm (−0.04, 0.05); −0.03 cm (−0.07, 0.02); 0.03 cm (−0.02, 0.08) and scar itch = 0.09 (−0.88, 1.06); −0.21 (−1.21, 0.79); 0.30 (−0.73, 1.32) for silicone vs pressure; silicone vs combined and combined vs pressure respectively. No serious adverse effects occurred. Conclusion: Similar to short-term results, the combined intervention offered no statistically or clinically significant benefit for improving the primary outcomes compared to each intervention alone. No differences in the primary outcomes were identified between the silicone and pressure alone groups.

Background Clinical practice benefits from the measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) to reflect the impact of the disease and treatments from the patient’s lived experience. The Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (child and young person version, BBSIP8−18), developed in 2013, is a self-report measure of burn scar-specific HRQoL. The purpose of the study was to test reliability, validity and responsiveness of this measure for an evaluative purpose. Methods Young people aged 8–18 years with burn scarring or at probable risk of burn scarring (defined as 14 days or longer to re-epithelialize) were included in a prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Data was collected at a paediatric burn centre at baseline (when ≥85% of the total body surface area re- epithelialized), then 1–2 weeks and 1-month post-baseline. Participants completed measures of HRQoL (BBSIP8−18, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory) and scar characteristics (Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale) at each time-point. Results Sixty-five participants completed the baseline testing. Forty-nine participants completed testing at 1–2 weeks post-baseline and thirty-two at 1-month post-baseline. Internal consistency of item groups ranged from Cronbach’s α 0.60 (frequency of sensory symptoms) to 0.90 (emotional reactions). All item groups expected to be stable had acceptable test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.71–0.83), except ‘mobility’ and ‘friendships and social interaction’ (ICC = 0.52 and 0.45). Construct validity was supported with 10 of 13 (77%) hypothesised correlations of change in the BBSIP8−18 items corresponding with changes in external criterion measures. The responsiveness of 8 out of 10 item groups tested against an external criterion was supported (AUC = 0.71–0.92). Conclusion The BBSIP8−18 has acceptable reliability, validity and responsiveness supporting its use as an evaluative self-report measure of burn scar-specific HRQoL in the early post-acute phase after burn injury.

Objectives Following a paediatric burn, parents commonly experience high levels of acute psychological distress, which has been shown to increase child psychological distress as well as child procedural distress. The influence of psychological stress and perceived pain on wound healing has been demonstrated in several laboratory and medical populations. This paper investigates the influence of parental acute psychological distress and procedural behaviour on the child's rate of re-epithelialization, after controlling for child procedural distress. Design A prospective observational study with longitudinal outcome. Methods Eighty-three parents of children 1-6 years old reported acute psychological distress (post-traumatic stress symptoms [PTSS], guilt, pre-procedural fear, general anxiety/depression symptoms) in relation to their child's burn. A researcher observed parent-child behaviour at the first dressing change, and parents and nurses reported child procedural distress (pre-, peak-, and post-procedural pain and fear). These variables, along with demographic and injury information, were tested for predicting time to re-epithelialization. Date of re-epithelialization was determined by the treating consultant. Results Days to re-epithelialization ranged from 3 to 35 days post-injury. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis found wound depth and size significantly accounted for 28% of the variance in time to re-epithelialization. In Block 2, child peak-procedural pain significantly accounted for 6% additional variance. In Block 3, parental PTSS significantly accounted for 5% additional variance. Conclusions Parental PTSS appears to be an important but under-recognized factor that may influence their child's burn re-epithelialization. Further investigation is required to understand the mechanisms contributing to this association. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Psychological stress delays wound healing, and this relationship has been found in paediatric burn populations with procedural pain. Parental psychological stress is often present after a child's burn and is related to the child's procedural coping and distress. What does this study add? Parental post-traumatic stress is related to delayed child burn re-epithelialization. This association is in addition to procedural pain delaying re-epithelialization.

Background: Current consensus for the ideal pressure range at the pressure garment to scar interface is 15–25 mmHg. Interface pressure variability has been reported at new pressure garment fitting in children. Pressure reductions up to 25% have been recorded over one month in adults. Method: A pilot longitudinal cohort study was completed with children aged less than 18 years receiving pressure garment therapy after burn. Interface pressure was measured at first pressure garment fitting, one month and three months after fitting. Analysis was conducted using Linear Mixed Models. Results: Thirty-four children were recruited to the study, 62% were male. Participants had a median (IQR) age of 3 (6) years. At the first garment fitting, 32% of stationary and 25% of dynamic measurements were within 15–25 mmHg. Pressure variations were recorded at one and three months with scar location (p = 0.03) and %TBSA (p = 0.006) identified as predictors of stationary interface pressure. No statistically significant predictors of dynamic pressure were identified. Discussion: Interface pressure variability was recorded over time during children's wear of the first pressure garment after burn. Further investigation of factors contributing to pressure changes, subsequent impact on adherence and the effect of sub-optimal pressure application on burn scar outcomes is indicated.

Pediatric burn injuries and subsequent wound care can be painful and distressing for children and their parents. This study tested parenting behavior as a mediator for the relationship between parental acute psychological distress and child behavior during burn wound care. Eighty-seven parents of children (1-6-years-old) self-reported accident-related posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), pre-procedural anxiety, general anxiety/depression symptoms, and guilt before the first dressing change. Parent-child behavior was observed during the first dressing change. Mediation analyses identified three indirect effects. Parental PTSS predicted more child distress, mediated through parental distress-promoting behavior. Parental guilt predicted more child distress, mediated through parental distress-promoting behavior. Parental general anxiety/depression symptoms predicted less child coping, mediated through less parental coping-promoting behavior. Parents with accident-related psychological distress have difficulty supporting their child through subsequent medical care. Nature of parental symptomology differentially influenced behavior. Increased acute psychological support for parents may reduce young child procedural pain-related distress.

Background Burns are a painful and traumatic experience, particularly in children. Reduced pain and anxiety positively influences re-epithelialisation rates in paediatric burn patients, however current literature fails to fully explain the effects of pain and anxiety and their links with wound healing. This study will determine if Burnaid® hydrogel dressing is an effective treatment for reducing pain in the acute period of a burn injury. It is hypothesised that a reduction in pain will then improve re-epithelialisation time in comparison to plastic wrap, which is standard practice at our institution — a metropolitan tertiary paediatric hospital located in Brisbane, Australia. Methods/design A randomised controlled trial will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of Burnaid® as an analgesic adjunct to cold running water first aid for the treatment of paediatric burns. Participants will include children aged between 0 and 16 years with an acute thermal burn injury (total burn surface area

IntroductionUsing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with children have been described as ‘giving a voice to the child’. Few studies have examined the routine use of these measures as potentially therapeutic interventions. This study aims to investigate: (1) the effectiveness of feedback using graphical displays of information from electronic PROMs (ePROMs) that target health-related quality of life, to improve health outcomes, referrals and treatment satisfaction and (2) the implementation of ePROMs and graphical displays by assessing acceptability, sustainability, cost, fidelity and context of the intervention and study processes.Methods and analysisA hybrid II effectiveness-implementation study will be conducted from February 2020 with children with life-altering skin conditions attending two outpatient clinics at a specialist paediatric children’s hospital. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial and mixed methods process evaluation will be completed. Randomisation will occur at the child participant level. Children or parent proxies completing baseline ePROMs will be randomised to: (1) completion of ePROMs plus graphical displays of ePROM results to treating clinicians in consultations, versus (2) completion of ePROMs without graphical display of ePROM results. The primary outcome of the effectiveness trial will be overall health-related quality of life of children. Secondary outcomes will include other health-related quality of life outcomes (eg, child psychosocial and physical health, parent psychosocial health), referrals and treatment satisfaction. Trial data will be primarily analysed using linear mixed-effects models; and implementation data using inductive thematic analysis of interviews, meeting minutes, observational field notes and study communication mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from Children’s Health Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2019/QCHQ/56290), The University of Queensland (2019002233) and Queensland University of Technology (1900000847). Dissemination will occur through stakeholder groups, scientific meetings and peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration numberAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000174987).

Diphallia is an extremely rare embryological anomaly, occurring once in 5–6 million births. Here we discuss a neonate who was referred for surgical consultation of diphallia, in which examination revealed a dominant right phallus and apparently shorter left phallus. MRI and retrograde urethrogram revealed a unique pathway of the right urethra and a stenosed, but otherwise normal left urethra. The decision was made to excise the right phallus and associated urethra due to the correct anatomy of the left phallus and corresponding urethra.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and adolescents are disproportionately affected by burn injuries, yet often omitted from burns literature or inadequately portrayed under Western frameworks. We highlight and address the urgent need for knowledge about pediatric burns among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to be produced from within Indigenous research methodologies and in response to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ expressed needs. Through the use of decolonial ethnography, we applied a novel combination of participant observations, retrospective thinking aloud, and yarning methods to explore the psychosocial impact of pediatric burn injuries and care on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families. To our knowledge, this is the first example of these three methods being interwoven to explore a multifaceted health issue and in a way that privileges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' knowledge systems, voices, and experiences. We suggest that these approaches have strong relevance and potential for other complex issues affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

BACKGROUND: Stereophotogrammetry (SPG) provides a more objective measurement of burn wound area than traditional clinical assessments. The recently developed Intel® RealSense™ D415/Wound Measure SPG system has yet to undergo formal evaluation in a paediatric population. METHODS: A pilot study comparing the Intel® RealSense™ D415/Wound Measure to the previously validated LifeVizII®/DermaPix® SPG system, for burn assessment was conducted at a tertiary paediatric burn centre. Both systems were used to photograph and analyse the same acute wounds for each patient. Three independent raters measured wound area and perimeter. Level of agreement between systems and raters was estimated by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Wound area measurements were completed in both systems for 25 burns from 13 patients (median age, 2 years). The participants were mainly female (n = 9), with a median TBSA-B of 9% (IQR 3-20%). There was strong agreement between the systems 0.757 (95% CI 0.521, 0.885, p < 0.001). Within each SPG system, there was excellent inter-rater reliability. CONCLUSION: The Intel® RealSense™ D415/Wound Measure system may be a viable addition to the clinician's toolkit in the assessment of paediatric burn wound area. As with other SPG systems, there were significant challenges measuring wounds to highly contoured surfaces.

Appropriate pain management for children who have experienced an acute burn injury is critical to improve patient outcomes and reduce potential morbidities. With 60% of our patients being under the age of 4 years, pain management is crucial in reducing pain and anxiety in both patients and parents. It is imperative that appropriate pain relief is commenced from initial contact with healthcare workers as this will affect the success or failure of future wound procedures. Uncontrolled pain can negatively affect a patient, both short and long term. It may cause anticipatory anxiety for future medical procedures, increased pain and anxiety can decrease wound re-epithelialization which can lead to long-term consequences for growth and mobility, and increased pain can also influence the possibility of patients and families displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder. Pain management in the form of pharmaceuticals is imperative during burn wound treatment and should incorporate pain relief targeted at both background and procedural pain. It also requires a multimodal, individualized, and targeted approach combining both pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical techniques, including cold running water, multimodal distraction devices, hypnotherapy, and bubbles. We discuss the research and knowledge that our center has gained through treating pediatric patients with burns over the last 20 years.

Emergency Medicine Australasia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian College for Emergency Medicine Objective: To determine the adequacy of cool running water first aid provided by healthcare professionals in the early management of children with thermal burn injuries. Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken using a prospectively collected registry of children who presented with a thermal burn to the only major paediatric burns centre in Queensland, Australia, from January 2013 to December 2018. Main outcome measures included the type and duration of first aid administered by paramedics, general practitioners and emergency providers at local general hospitals and a children's hospital. In accordance with current Australian guidelines, adequate cooling was defined as 20 min of cool running water within 3 h of the injury. Results: Of the 4537 children who presented to the paediatric burns centre, 3261 (71.9%) received adequate first aid, including 1502 (33.1%) at the scene of injury. Paramedics and general practitioners administered adequate cooling to 184 (25.0%) and 52 (24.2%) of their patients, respectively. ED clinicians adhered to guidelines in the treatment of 1019 (56.3%) children at general hospitals and 411 (76.0%) at the children's hospital. Among ED patients who presented with incomplete prior first aid, the risk of inadequate cooling was significantly greater for those transported via ambulance (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Deficiencies remain in the cooling of paediatric burns patients at all levels of initial management. There is a need in the healthcare community for improved education regarding the parameters and clinical benefits of cool running water first aid.

This case reports details a successful approach to the surgical management of an extensive penoscrotal microcystic lymphatic malformation in an adolescent male. The patient had staged total excision of skin and subcutaneous tissue and reconstruction was achieved with a combination of thick and thin split thickness grafts.