Search

Limited data exist regarding the significance of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).We evaluated 16,922 consecutive ACS patients who were prospectively included in a national ACS registry. The co-primary endpoint included 30 days major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (re-infarction, stroke, and/or cardiovascular death) and 1-year mortality.PAD patients were older (70±11 vs 63±13; p0.01), male predominance (80% vs 77%; p=0.01), and more likely to sustain prior cardiovascular events. PAD patients were less likely to undergo coronary angiography (69% vs 83%; p0.001) and revascularisation (80% vs 86%; p0.001). Patients with PAD were more likely to sustain 30-day MACE (22% vs 14%; p0.001) and mortality (10% vs 4.4%; p0.001), as well as re-hospitalisation (23% vs 19%; p=0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, PAD remained an independent predictor of 30-day MACE (odds ratio [OR], 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-2.06]). Patients with compared to those without PAD had 2.5 times higher 1-year mortality rate (22% vs 9%; p0.001). Co-existence of PAD remained an independent predictor of 1-year mortality after adjustment for potential confounders by multivariable regression analysis (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.4-1.9). PAD was associated with a significant higher 1-year mortality rate across numerous sub-groups of patients including type of myocardial infarction (ST-elevation myocardial infarction vs non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction), and whether the patient underwent revascularisation.Acute coronary syndrome with concomitant PAD represents a high-risk subgroup that warrants special attention and a more tailored approach.

Background: Guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure (HF) may benefit patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Few real-world data are available regarding the early implementation of HF therapies in patients with ACS and reduced LVEF. Methods: Data collected from the 2021 nationwide, prospective ACS Israeli Survey (ACSIS). Drug classes included: (a) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI); (b) beta-blockers; (c) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and (d) sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2I). The utilization of HF therapies at discharge or 90 days following ACS was analyzed in relation to LVEF [reduced ≤40% (n = 406) or mildly-reduced 41–49% (n = 255)] and short-term adverse outcomes. Results: History of HF, anterior wall myocardial infarction and Killip class II-IV (32% vs. 14% p < 0.001) were more prevalent in those with reduced compared to mildly-reduced LVEF. ACEI/ARB/ARNI and beta-blockers were used by the majority of patients in both LVEF groups, though ARNI was prescribed to only 3.9% (LVEF ≤ 40%). MRA was used by 42.9% and 12.2% of patients with LVEF ≤40% and 41–49%, respectively, and SGLT2I in about a quarter of both LVEF groups. Overall, ≥3 HF drug classes were documented in 44% of the patients. A trend towards higher rates of 90-day HF rehospitalizations, recurrent ACS or all-cause death was noted in those with reduced (7.6%) vs. mildly-reduced (3.7%) LVEF, p = 0.084. No association was observed between the number of HF drug classes or the use of ARNI and/or SGLT2I with adverse clinical outcomes. Conclusions: In current clinical practice, the majority of patients with reduced and mildly-reduced LVEF are treated by ACEI/ARB and beta-blockers early following ACS, whereas MRA is underutilized and the adoption of SGLT2I and ARNI is low. A greater number of therapeutic classes was not associated with reduced short-term rehospitalizations or mortality.

Background Previous studies have demonstrated that those suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) experience various physical and psychological symptoms. Few studies have investigated the multi-factorial, holistic, unpleasant experience of distress that includes physical, psychological, social, and spiritual factors among this patient population while still hospitalized. Aim To describe the level of distress among patients hospitalized with ACS and its association with demographic and clinical factors and mortality. Study design The study conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional survey. Methods The Acute Coronary Syndrome Israel Study is a national, biennial registry, enrolling all patients with ACS admitted to cardiac intensive care or cardiology wards in Israel within a 2-month period. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from an electronic database. Distress was measured by the Distress Thermometer. Nurses collected distress data directly from patients before discharge. Results Nine hundred ninety participants (50.6% response rate) were surveyed. Mean age was 62.8 (SD = 12.5). Mean distress level was 4.8 (SD = 3.45) out of 10. The most frequently reported area of distress was physical, followed by emotional. Practical and family problems were less frequent. Emotional distress was found to differ based on educational level, marital status, smoking history, and previous medical history. Distress did not predict 7- or 30-day mortality. Conclusions Respondents with ACS were in moderate distress. It is recommended that those at increased risk receive increased monitoring of emotional distress while still in hospital. Further studies should investigate this holistic view of distress among the ACS population using a variety of methods and methodologies.

Background Various prognostic models for mortality prediction following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been developed over the past two decades. Our group has previously demonstrated that machine learning (ML)-based models can outperform known risk scores for 30-day mortality post-STEMI. The study aimed to redevelop an ML-based random forest prediction model for 30-day mortality post-STEMI and externally validate it on a large cohort. Methods This was a retrospective, supervised learning, data mining study developed on the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS) registry and the Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project (MINAP) for external validation. Patients included received reperfusion therapy for STEMI between 2006 and 2016. Discrimination and calibration performances were assessed for two developed models and compared with the Global Registry of Acute Cardiac Events (GRACE) score. Results The ACSIS cohort (2,782 included /15,212 total) and MINAP cohort (22,693 included/735,000 total) were significantly different in most variables, yet similar in 30-day mortality rate (4.3–4.4%). Random forest models were developed on the ACSIS cohort with a full model including all 32 variables and a simple model including the 10 most important ones. Features’ importance was calculated using the varImp function measuring how much each feature contributes to the data's homogeneity. Applying the optimized models on the MINAP validation cohort showed high discrimination of area under the curve (AUC) = 0.804 (0.786–0.822) for the full model, and AUC = 0.787 (0.748–0.780) using the simple model, compared with the GRACE risk score discrimination of AUC = 0.764 (0.748–0.780). All models were not well calibrated for the MINAP data. Following Platt scaling on 20% of the MINAP data, the random forest models calibration improved while the GRACE calibration did not change. Conclusions The random forest predictive model for 30-day mortality post STEMI, developed on the ACSIS national registry, has been validated in the MINAP large external cohort and can be applied early at admission for risk stratification. The model performed better than the commonly used GRACE score. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first externally validated ML-based model for STEMI.

BackgroundSince the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2019, several countries have reported a substantial drop in the number of patients admitted with non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the changes in admissions, in-hospital management and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI in the COVID-19 era in a nationwide survey.MethodA prospective, multicenter, observational, nationwide study involving 13 medical centers across Israel aimed to evaluate consecutive patients with NSTEMI admitted to intensive cardiac care units over an 8-week period during the COVID-19 outbreak and to compare them with NSTEMI patients admitted at the same period 2 years earlier (control period).ResultsThere were 624 (43%) NSTEMI patients, of whom 349 (56%) were hospitalized during the COVID-19 era and 275 (44%) during the control period. There were no significant differences in age, gender and other baseline characteristics between the two study periods. During the COVID-19 era, more patients arrived at the hospital via an emergency medical system compared with the control period (P = 0.05). Time from symptom onset to hospital admission was longer in the COVID-19 era as compared with the control period [11.5 h (interquartile range, IQR, 2.5–46.7) vs. 2.9 h (IQR 1.7–6.8), respectively, P ConclusionIn contrast to previous reports, admission rates of NSTEMI were similar in this nationwide survey during the COVID-19 era. With longer time from symptoms to admission, but with the same time from hospital admission to reperfusion therapy and with similar in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates. Even in times of crisis, adherence of medical systems to clinical practice guidelines ensures the preservation of good clinical outcomes.

Background Illness perceptions (IPs) can affect cardiac health behaviours and outcomes. Aims and objectives To investigate IPs among patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Design Longitudinal survey. Methods The ACS Israel Study is a national, biennial registry, enrolling all patients with ACS admitted to cardiac intensive care or cardiology wards in Israel within a 2-month period. Data includes demographics, medical history, and treatment for ACS using an electronic database. In 2018, a nursing component was added, including the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and a two-stage cluster analysis. Results A total of 990 subjects were surveyed. Mean age was 62.8 (SD = 12.5) and most respondents were male and married. Mean IP scores ranged from 3.28 to 6.06. Three clusters were found; one only of women and two only of men (one cluster with lower IPs and little previous medical history and cardiac risk factors and the second with higher IPs, greater medical history, and cardiac risk factors. Those with higher education scored lower on several IPs. Conclusions Subjects were moderately cognitively and emotionally impacted by their illness. Men tended to perceive their illness as having either a relatively strong or a relatively weak emotional and cognitive impact on their lives, where women were somewhere in-between. Participants with an academic education perceived less of an impact of the illness while those with a previous history of chronic disease reported the opposite. It is recommended that educational interventions and in-depth qualitative studies be designed that investigate the development of IPs during hospitalization to potentially improve cardiac health behaviours, especially among those without a previous medical history and cardiac risk factors. Relevance to clinical practice Those without a history of chronic disease or a lower level of education are less likely to absorb the full impact of a cardiac event while hospitalized and should, therefore, be monitored more closely and coached with greater intensity than other groups while still in-hospital.

Intermediate zone troponin elevation is defined as one to five times the upper limit of normal. Approximately half the patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department have initial intermediate zone troponin. We aimed to investigate the long-term outcome of patients hospitalized with chest pain and intermediate zone troponin elevation. We investigated 8269 patients hospitalized in a tertiary center with chest pain. All patients had serial measurements of troponin during hospitalization. Patients were divided into three groups based on their initial troponin levels: negative troponin (N = 6112), intermediate zone troponin (N = 1329) and positive troponin (N = 828). All patients underwent myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) as part of the initial evaluation. Mean age of the study population was 68 ± 11, of whom 36% were women. Patients with an intermediate zone troponin were older, more likely to be males, and with significantly more cardiovascular co-morbidities. Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, and abnormal MPI result found that patients with intermediate zone troponin had a 70% increased risk of re-hospitalization at 1 year (HR 1.70, 95%CI 1.48–1.96, p-value

Background: Polycythemia has not been extensively studied for its impact on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) outcomes. A previous study reported only 30-day outcomes to be worse in these patients. Methods: Data from the ACS Israeli survey between 2000 and 2018 were utilized to compare between 3 groups of patients with ACS: anemic group (hemoglobin 16 g/dL and >16.5 g/dL, respectively). Measured outcomes included 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE comprising all-cause mortality, recurrent ACS, need for urgent revascularization, and stroke) and 1- and 5-year all-cause mortality. Results: Of 14,746 ACS patients, 10,752 (72.9%) had normal hemoglobin levels, 3,492 (23.7%) were anemic, and 502 (3.4%) were polycythemic. In comparison with normal and anemic patients, polycythemic patients were younger (55.9 ± 10.5 vs. 61.9 ± 12.4 and 71.1 ± 12.2 for anemic, respectively, p < 0.001 for both), more frequently men (93.8% vs. 81.3% and 63.1%, respectively, p < 0.001), and less likely diabetic or hypertensive. Upon adjustment to baseline characteristics, compared with normal hemoglobin, polycythemia was not independently associated with 30-day MACE or 1-year mortality, but it was independently associated with higher risk for 5-year mortality (HR 1.76, 95% CI: 1.19–2.59, p = 0.005). Similar results were observed after propensity score matching. Conclusions: Although younger and with fewer comorbidities, polycythemic ACS patients are at increased risk for long-term all-cause mortality. Further study of this association is warranted to understand the causes and possibly to improve the outcomes of these patients.

ObjectiveSome patients following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at particularly increased risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. We aimed to examine temporal trends in the management and outcomes across the spectrum of these particularly high-risk patients.Design and settingA retrospective study based on the ACS Israeli survey (ACSIS) registry, a multicentre prospective national registry, taking place biennially in 25 cardiology departments in Israel. Temporal trends were examined in the early (2002–2008) and late (2010–2018) time periods.ParticipantsConsecutive patients with ACS enrolled in the ACSIS registry were stratified according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for secondary prevention (TRS2°P) to high (TRS2°p=3), very high (TRS2°p=4) or extremely high risk (TRS2°p=5–9). Patients with TRS2°pClinical outcome measures included 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and 1-year mortality.ResultsAmong 5359 patients (50% high risk, 30% very high risk and 20% extremely high risk), those with a higher risk were older, had more comorbidities, presented more with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, and were treated less often with guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy and percutaneous coronary intervention. Over time, treatment has improved in all risk strata, and the rate of 30-day MACE has significantly decreased in all risk groups (from 21% to 10%, from 22% to 15%, and from 26% to 16%, in high, very high and extremely high-risk groups, respectively, pConclusionWithin a particularly high-risk cohort of patients with ACS, treatment has significantly progressed over almost 2 decades. While short-term outcomes have improved in all risk groups, 1-year mortality has remained unchanged in extremely high-risk patients with ACS.

Estimated frequency of aortic stenosis (AS) in those over 75 years of age is 3.4%. Symptomatic patients with severe AS have increased morbidity and mortality and aortic valve replacement should be offered to improve life expectancy and quality of life.To identify whether systolic time intervals can identify severe AS.The study comprised 200 patients (mean age 79 years, 55% men). Patients were equally divided into normal, mild, moderate, or severe AS. All patients had normal ejection fraction. Acceleration time (AT) was defined as the time from the beginning of systolic flow to maximal velocity; ejection time (ET) was the time from onset to end of systolic flow. The relation of AT/ET was calculated. Death or aortic valve intervention were documented. AT increased linearly with the severity of AS, similar to ET and AT/ET ratio (P for trend0.05 for all). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that AT can identify severe AS with a cutoff ≥ 108 msec with 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity, while a cutoff of 0.34 when using AT/ET ratio can identify severe AS with 96% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Multivariate analysis adjusting to sex, stroke volume index, heart rate, and body mass index showed similar results. Kaplan-Meier curve for AT ≥ 108 and AT/ET ≥ 0.34 predicted death or aortic valve intervention in a 3-year follow-up.Acceleration time and AT/ET ratio are reliable measurements for identifying patients with severe AS. Furthermore, AT and AT/ET were able to predict aortic valve replacement or death.

It is estimated that in the past two decades the number of patients diagnosed with diabetes mellites (DM) has doubled. Despite significant progress in the treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including novel anti-platelet agents, effective lipid-lowering medications, and advanced revascularization techniques, patients with DM still are least twice as likely to die of cardiovascular causes compared with their non-diabetic counterparts, and current guidelines define patients with DM at the highest risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Over the last few years, there has been a breakthrough in anti-diabetic therapeutics, as two novel anti-diabetic classes have demonstrated cardiovascular benefit with consistently reduced MACE, and for some agents, also improvement in heart failure status as well as reduced cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. These include the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. The benefits of these medications are thought to be derived not only from their anti-diabetic effect but also from additional mechanisms. The purpose of this review is to provide the everyday clinician a detailed review of the various agents within each class with regard to their specific characteristics and the effects on MACE and cardiovascular outcomes.

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high-risk for recurrent coronary syndromes, heart failure and death. Early coronary intervention combined with medications reduces these risks. The ACS Israeli Survey (ACSIS) is conducted over a 2-month period, every 2-3 years. ACSIS includes all patients discharged with a diagnosis of ACS from the 24 coronary care units and cardiology departments in Israel. We compared clinical profiles and 1-year survival between ACS patients who did and did not undergo coronary angiography.We reviewed ACSIS for the period 2002-2013.The prognosis of patients who did not undergo coronary angiography during hospitalization (N = 2078) was significantly worse than for patients who underwent angiography (N = 9550). Avoidance of angiography was less common in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients than in non-STEMI/unstable angina (NSTEMI/UAP) patients (13% vs. 22%, p 0.001). Among NSTEMI/UAP patients, those who did not undergo angiography were older (mean: 71 vs. 64 years, p 0.001), had higher incidences of diabetes (47% vs. 38%, p 0.001), and renal (55% vs. 27%, p 0.001) and heart failure (35% vs. 13%, p 0.01) on admission, compared to those who underwent angiography. Even patients that underwent only diagnostic angiography had had a better prognosis than patients who did not undergo angiography. After propensity score matching for the major differences mentioned above, survival was still significantly better for patients who underwent angiography.ACS patients who did not undergo coronary angiography had higher-risk clinical profiles and worse 1-year survival than ACS patients who underwent angiography. After propensity score matching, the absence of angiography was independently associated with higher mortality.Data over 10 years were reviewed from a national registry of acute coronary syndrome. Patients who did not undergo coronary angiography during hospitalization were older and with more comorbidities than patients who underwent angiography. After propensity score matching, the absence of angiography remained independently associated with 1-year mortality.

There are controversial data regarding the outcome and management of patients hospitalized with clinically diagnosed acute myocarditis.We retrospectively evaluated data of 322 consecutive patients admitted to the Sheba Medical Center with clinically suspected acute myocarditis from January 2005 to December 2017. Patients were subdivided into 2 groups based on their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at presentation: 1) patients with an LVEF50% (n = 60) and 2) patients with an LVEF ≥50% (n = 260). We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, management, and in-hospital outcome as well as short-term and 1-year outcome of patients admitted with acute myocarditis.The mean age of the study population was 37 ± 14 years, most of them (84%) males. Although chest pain was the main complaint in 89% of the patients at presentation, only 35% had typical pericardial pain. Patients with a LVEF50% were more likely to demonstrate ST depression or T wave inversion on their electrocardiogram (ECG) at presentation (33% vs 18%, P = 0.007), and have higher levels of admission and peak troponin compared to those with LVEF ≥50%,(12.7 μ/L ± 15 µ/L vs 5.5 μ/L ± 9.2 μ/L, P = 0.001 for admission troponin, 18.8 μ/L ± 19.9 μ/L vs 8.4 μ/L ± 11.6 μ/L, P0.001, for peak troponin). Univariate analysis showed that patients with an LVEF50% were more likely to suffer from adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of the following: 1) acute decompensated congestive heart failure; 2) ventricular arrhythmias; and 3) in-hospital mortality, compared to those with an LVEF ≥50% (15 [25%] vs10 [4%], P0.001). Consistently, multivariable analysis showed that patients with an LVEF50% had a 4-fold increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events compared to those patients with an LVEF ≥50% (heart rate [HR] = 4.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59-11.49; P0.001).Patients with clinical acute myocarditis seem to have an overall good prognosis. Although patients with an LVEF50% are at a higher risk of in-hospital adverse events compared to those with an LVEF ≥50%, this propensity is not reflected during 1-year of follow-up.

Elderly patients are often excluded from a chest pain unit (CPU)-based evaluation of chest pain due to concern about adverse events and poorer outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of thoroughly evaluating elderly patients ≥ 65 years of age presented with acute chest pain via a CPU. We evaluated 1220 consecutive patients admitted to our CPU, and stratified them according to age: those over and those under 65 years. Patients were evaluated for outcomes during hospitalization and for a composite endpoint at 60 days post discharge which included: recurrent hospitalization due to chest pain, need for coronary revascularization, acute coronary syndrome, and death. Overall, 241 (20%) patients were in the ≥ 65-year-old group and 979 (80%) patients in the group

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]) has recommended immediate (2 h) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in very-high risk patients and early (24 h) PCI in high-risk patients.To examine the ESC NSTEMI guidelines adherence in a nationwide survey in Israel using the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS). We hypothesized that adherence to the guidlines' recommnded PCI timing in NSTEMI pateints will be inadequate, partly due to the inconsistent evidence regarding its effect on clinical outcomes.All NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI during the ACSIS surveys in 2016 and 2018 were included in the analysis.Out of 1793 NSTEMI patients, 1643 (92%) patients underwent PCI, and door to balloon time was documented in 1078 of them. One hundred and fifty-six (14.5%) patients and 922 (85.5%) patients were defined as very high-risk and high-risk NSTEMI patients, respectively. Of the very high-risk NSTEMI patients, only 10 (6.4%) underwent immediate coronary angiography, and 50 (32.1%) underwent early coronary angiography. Acute heart failure 139 (89.1%) was the main reason for including NSTEMI patients in the very high-risk category. Of the high-risk patients, early coronary angiography was performed in only 405 (43.9%) patients. Patients in whom coronary angiography was postponed were older and had more comorbidities.Despite guidelines recommendations for immediate and early PCI in very high-risk and high-risk NSTEMI patients, respectively, most patients do not undergo immediate or early PCI according to contemporary guidelines. Further studies are needed to better understand the reasons for guidelines' nonadherence in those high-risk patients.

Patients who have previously had a myocardial infarction (MI) are considered a high-risk group with increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. During the last decade, the outcome of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients has improved due to advances in medical therapy and interventional techniques. We aimed to examine temporal trends and outcomes of patients with prior MI admitted due to ACS from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS). Included were 16,934 ACS patients, of whom 31.4% had prior MI. For temporal trend analysis, the cohort was divided into an early period (2000–2008) and late period (2010–2018). For patients with prior MI, patients in the late period had a higher rate of CV risk factors and were treated more frequently with revascularization and guidelines-directed medical therapy. Recurrent MI (6.7% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), MACE (10.6% vs. 21%, p < 0.001) and 1-year mortality (10.7% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the late period. However, the mortality rate for patients with prior MI remained higher compared with patients without prior MI (10.7% vs. 6.8% p < 0.001) with an overall higher mortality rate in the STEMI group. Thus, despite significant improvement in outcome measures in the contemporary era, ACS patients with prior MI are still at increased risk for recurrent ischemic CV events and mortality.

Purpose: To evaluate the role of diabetes mellitus in the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of AKI (acute kidney injury) in patients admitted with ACS (acute coronary syndrome). Methods: We performed a comparative evaluation of ACS patients with vs. without DM who developed AKI enrolled in the biennial ACS Israeli Surveys (ACSIS) between 2000 and 2018. AKI was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine (≥0.5 mg/dL) or above 1.5 mg/dL or new renal replacement therapy upon admission with ACS. Outcomes included 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and 1-year all-cause mortality. Results: The current study included a total of 16,879 patients, median age 64 (IQR 54–74), 77% males, 36% with DM. The incidence of AKI was significantly higher among patients with vs. without DM (8.4% vs. 4.7%, p &lt, 0.001). The rates of 30-day MACE (40.8% vs. 13.4%, p &lt, 0.001) and 1-year mortality (43.7% vs. 10%, p &lt, 0.001) were significantly greater among diabetic patients who developed vs. those who did not develop AKI respectively, yet very similar among patients that developed AKI with vs. without DM (30-day MACE 40.8% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.9 1-year mortality 43.7 vs. 44.8%, p = 0.8, respectively). Multivariate analyses adjusted to potential confounders, showed similar independent predictors of AKI among patients with and without DM, comprising, older age, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and peripheral arterial disease. Conclusions: Although patients with DM are at much greater risk for AKI when admitted with ACS, the independent predictors of AKI and the worse patient outcomes when AKI occurs, are similar irrespective to DM status.

Background Since the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak several countries have reported a decrease in the number of patients admitted with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Purpose We aimed to evaluate admission trend and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI in the COVID-19 era in a nationwide survey. Methods A prospective, multicenter, observational, nationwide study involving 13 medical centers across Israel. All NSTEMI patients admitted to intensive cardiac care units (ICCUs) over an 8-week period during the COVID-19 outbreak were compare them with NSTEMI patients admitted 2 years earlier (control period) during the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS) 2018. Results There were 624 (43%) NSTEMI patients, of them 349 (56%) hospitalized during the COVID-19 era and 275 (44%) during the control period, representing a 27% increase in NSTEMI admission rate during the COVID-19 era. Approximately 76% were male, median age was 67 years (IQR 58–76). There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two study periods. During the COVID-19 era, more patients arrived at the hospital via an emergency medical system (EMS) compared with the control period (p for trend = 0.005) Time from symptom onset to hospital admission was longer in the COVID-19 era [687.00 (IQR147–2805) vs. 178.00 (IQR 102- 407), respectively, p-value Conclusions In contrast to previous reports, in Israel, admission rate of NSTEMI was increased during the COVID-19 era. With longer time from symptoms to admission, but with the same time from hospital admission to reperfusion therapy and with similar in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Introduction: We aimed to compare the outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention treated with prasugrel versus ticagrelor. Methods: Among 7,233 patients enrolled to the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS) between 2010 and 2018, we identified 1,126 eligible patients treated with prasugrel and 817 with ticagrelor. Comparison between the groups was performed separately in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, propensity score matched (PSM) STEMI patients, and non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) patients. Results: In-hospital complication rates, including rates of stent thrombosis, were not significantly different between groups. In PSM STEMI patients, 30-day re-hospitalization rate (p < 0.05), 30-day MACE (the composite of death, MI, stroke, and urgent revascularization, p = 0.006), and 1-year mortality rates (p = 0.08) were higher in the ticagrelor group compared to the prasugrel group; in NSTE-ACS patients, outcomes were not associated with drug choice. In Cox regression analysis applied on the entire cohort, prasugrel was associated with lower 1-year mortality in STEMI patients but not in NSTE-ACS patients (p for interaction 0.03). Conclusions: Compared to ticagrelor, prasugrel was associated with superior clinical outcomes in STEMI patients, but not in NSTE-ACS patients.

INTRODUCTION Up to 20% of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have no traditional cardiovascular risk-factors (RFs). Data regarding the determinants, management, and outcomes of these patients are scarce. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the management, outcomes, and time-dependent changes of ACS patients without RFs. METHODS Evaluation of clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes as well as time-dependent changes [by 3 time periods: early (2000-2006), mid (2008-2013), and late (2016-2018)] of ACS patients without RFs (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history of ischemic heart disease, and smoking) or known coronary artery disease, enrolled in the biennial ACS Israeli Surveys (ACSIS) between 2000 and 2018. We compared ACS patients without RFs (no-RF group) to those with ≥1 RFs (RF group). RESULTS Overall, 554/9,683 (5.7%) eligible ACS patients did not have any RFs [median age 63 (IQR 52-76) years, 25% females]. The no-RF group were older, with lower body mass index and prevalence of other cardiovascular comorbidity and chronic kidney disease compared with the RF group. The in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention rates were lower among the no-RF vs. the RF group (55% vs. 66%, respectively p

BACKGROUND Frailty is an underrecognized and important entity that bears worse prognosis. Although low serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) can serve as a novel marker of frailty, its use was never assessed in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. METHODS A retrospective analysis of hospitalized ACS patients in the intensive cardiac care unit (ICCU)between 1/5/2011 and 1/12/2020 at a single tertiary medical center. RESULTS The study included 3956 patients after excluding patients with ALT >40 IU/L, cirrhosis, and missing data, followed for a medianduration of 47 months (IQR 20-77).Patients were stratified into two groups based on their first ALT measurement within the index hospitalization: low-normal ALT group (ALT ≤10 IU/L) vs. high-normal ALT group (ALT >10 IU/L). Patients with ALT≤10 IU/L were older (mean age 71 years vs. 65 years, p

BACKGROUND Clinical risk assessment with quantitative formal risk scores may add to intuitive physician risk assessment and are advised by the international guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Most previous studies have used the binary regression/classification approach (dead/alive) for long-term mortality post-ACS, without considering the time-to-event as in survival analysis. The use of machine learning (ML)-based survival models has yet to be validated. The primary objective was to compare survival prediction performance of 1-year mortality following ACS of two newly developed ML-based models [random survival forest (RSF) and deep learning (DeepSurv)] with the traditional Cox-proportional hazard (CPH) model. The secondary objective was external validation of the findings. METHODS This was a retrospective, supervised learning data mining study based on the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS) and the Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project (MINAP). The ACSIS data were divided to train/test in a 70/30 fashion. Next, the models were externally validated on the MINAP data. Harrell's C-index, inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW), and the Brier-score were used for models' performance comparison. RESULTS RSF performed best among the three models, with Harrell's C-index on training and testing sets reaching 0.953 and 0.924 respectively, followed by CPH multivariate selected model (0.805/0.849), CPH Univariate selected model (0.828/0.806), DeepSurv model (0.801/0.804), and the traditional CPH model (0.826/0.738). The RSF model also had the highest performance on the validation data set with 0.811 for Harrell's C-index, 0.844 for IPCW, and 0.093 for Brier score. The CPH model performance on the validation set had C-index range between 0.689 to 0.790, 0.713 to 0.826 for IPCW, and 0.094 to 0.103 Brier score. CONCLUSIONS RSF survival predictions for long-term mortality post-ACS show improved model performance compared with the classic statistical method. This may benefit patients by allowing better risk stratification and tailored therapy, however further prospective evaluations are required.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) patients with right ventricular (RV) involvement are a heterogenous group who mandate further risk stratification. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the PE severity index (PESI) for predicting adverse clinical outcomes among PE patients with RV involvement. Consecutive normotensive PE patients with RV involvement were allocated according to admission PESI score (PESI ≤ III vs. PESI ≥ IV). The primary outcome included hemodynamic instability and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included each component of the primary outcome as well as mechanical ventilation, thrombolytic therapy, acute kidney injury, and major bleeding. Multivariable logistic regression model was performed to assess the independent association between the PESI score and primary outcome. C-Statistic was used to compare the PESI with the BOVA score. A total of 253 patients were evaluated: 95 (38%) with a PESI ≥ IV. Of them, 82 (32%) patients were classified as intermediate–low risk and 171 (68%) as intermediate–high risk. Fifty (20%) patients had at least 1 adverse event. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the PESI to be an independent predictor for the primary outcome (HR 4.81, CI 95%, 1.15–20.09, p = 0.031), which was increased with a concomitant increase of the PESI score (PESI I 4.2%, PESI II 3.4%, PESI III 12%, PESI IV 16.3%, PESI V 23.1%, p for trend

BackgroundWe aimed to describe the characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients during the Covid-19 era.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, multicenter study involving 13 intensive cardiac care units, to evaluate consecutive STEMI patients admitted throughout an 8-week period during the Covid-19 outbreak. These patients were compared with consecutive STEMI patients admitted during the corresponding period in 2018 who had been prospectively documented in the Israeli bi-annual National Acute Coronary Syndrome Survey. The primary end-point was defined as a composite of malignant arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, and/or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included individual components of primary outcome, cardiogenic shock, mechanical complications, electrical complications, re-infarction, stroke, and pericarditis.ResultsThe study cohort comprised 1466 consecutive acute MI patients, of whom 774 (53%) were hospitalized during the Covid-19 outbreak. Overall, 841 patients were diagnosed with STEMI: 424 (50.4%) during the Covid-19 era and 417 (49.6%) during the parallel period in 2018. Although STEMI patients admitted during the Covid-19 period had fewer co-morbidities, they presented with a higher Killip class (p value = .03). The median time from symptom onset to reperfusion was extended from 180 minutes (IQR 122–292) in 2018 to 290 minutes (IQR 161–1080, p < .001) in 2020. Hospitalization during the Covid-19 era was independently associated with an increased risk of the combined endpoint in the multivariable regression model (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.03–2.68, p value = .04). Furthermore, the rate of mechanical complications was four times higher during the Covid-19 era (95% CI 1.42–14.8, p-value = .02). However, in-hospital mortality remained unchanged (OR 1.73, 95% CI 0.81–3.78, p-value = .16).ConclusionsSTEMI patients admitted during the first wave of Covid-19 outbreak, experienced longer total ischemic time, which was translated into a more severe disease status upon hospital admission, and a higher rate of in-hospital adverse events, compared with parallel period.

Background and aims The beneficial effect of statin therapy has been well established for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, it remains under-used among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to investigate the impact of statin therapy across a wide spectrum of CKD patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods We included all patients with ACS enrolled in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israel Survey (ACSIS) between the years 2006 and 2016, and allocated them to 3 groups according to their renal function based on an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculation on admission (MDRD formula): eGFR 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 6501, 73%). Primary outcome included in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and the independent prognostic effect of statins among CKD patients with ACS, by Cox regression analysis. Results All 8945 consecutive ACS patients were included in our analysis. On hospital discharge, statin prescriptions were negatively associated with eGFR ]eGFR>60 ml/min/1.73 m2 -95%, eGFR 30–59 ml/min/1.73 m2 -90%, eGFR Conclusions In our study, the beneficial effect of statins was maintained among CKD patients presenting with ACS. Therefore, these patients should be treated with statins regardless of their eGFR.

The GRACE risk score is currently recommended as the major score for risk prediction on admission in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Anemia in patients with ACS adversely affects their clinical outcomes, yet hemoglobin level on admission is not included as a parameter in the GRACE score. We hypothesized that hemoglobin level on admission would improve the predictive value of the GRACE score.We retrospectively studied one-year mortality in consecutive ACS patients included in the ACSIS (acute coronary syndrome Israeli Survey) registry between the years 2008 and 2013. Patients were classified into groups according to the GRACE score - ≥140 or140, and according to the hemoglobin level: severe anemia -8g/dl; mild anemia - 8-12g/dl; no anemia -12g/dl. We analyzed the incremental predictive value of admission hemoglobin levels over the GRACE score.We studied 11,505 patients. The GRACE score predicted 1-year mortality with an area under the curve (ROC) of 0.68 (95% CI 0.66-0.7). When hemoglobin level on admission was incorporated into the model, the ROC increased to 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75, p0.001). The incremental value of hemoglobin levels on admission was significant only in the low (140) GRACE score group.In patients a with low GRACE score (140), anemia on admission has additional predictive value for one-year mortality. In contrast, in patients with a high GRACE risk score, hemoglobin level on admission did not improve prediction accuracy.

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) patients with right ventricular (RV) involvement are a heterogenous group who mandate further risk stratification. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the PE severity index (PESI) for predicting adverse clinical outcomes among PE patients with RV involvement. Methods and Results: Consecutive normotensive PE patients with RV involvement were allocated according to admission PESI score (PESI

Background Despite optimized management of STEMI patients including primary PCI (PPCI) and use of novel anti-platelet agents, a substantial proportion still display a large infarct size and microvascular damage. The extent of MI and presence of microvascular damage as determined by cardiac MRI (CMR) are considered as powerful prognostic factors in predicting both early and long-term prognosis in those patients. Platelets reactivity has been implicated in pathogenesis of microvascular and subsequent myocardial damage including distal embolization, microvascular platelets plugging and inflammation. Methods We prospectively evaluated 105 consecutive STEMI patients, with no prior MI, who underwent PPCI. Patients underwent 2D-echocardiography within 48 hours of admission and cardiac MRI (CMR) 5±1 day post admission. All Patients were treated with dual antiplatelet agents and blood sample were analyzed for platelets reactivity (PA) at 72 hours post admission, using arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as agonists. Aspirin hypo-responsiveness was defined as AA-PA≥30%, and P2Y12 non-responsiveness as ADP-PA ≥50%. CMR was evaluated for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and microvascular obstruction (MVO), which reflects MI size and microvascular damage respectively. Both parameters were quantified as % of the LV mass. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as the composite of death, MI, stroke, urgent revascularization and hospitalization due to either heart failure or bleeding during the first year post AMI. Results AA and ADP inhibition were 22±17, and 34±16 respectively. Aspirin hypo-responsiveness was associated with significantly higher extent of LGE (p=0.04) and MVO (p=0.003). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that AA-PA hypo-responsiveness is an independent predictor of both MI size as reflected in LGE (OR 3.87; 95% CI: 1.47–10.5, p=0.031), and higher extent of microvascular damage as reflected by MVO% of LV mass (OR 3.6; 95% CI: 1.15–10.3, p=0.027). Patients with aspirin hypo-responsiveness were significantly more likely to sustain MACE (36% vs 12%, HR 4.13, 95% CI: 1.52–10.2, p=0.003). As opposed to AA related platelets reactivity, no significant correlation was demonstrated between ADP induced platelets reactivity and either measures of MVO or LGE. Conclusions In patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI, platelets reactivity in response to AA is an independent predictor of the extent of both myocardial and microvascular damage. Aspirin hypo-responsiveness is associated with higher rate of adverse events during 1-year follow-up. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None