Search

The cofilins are members of a protein family that binds monomeric and filamentous actin, severs actin filaments, and increases monomer off-rate from the pointed end. Here, we characterize the cofilin-actin interface. We confirm earlier work suggesting the importance of the lower region of subdomain 1 encompassing the N and C termini (site 1) in cofilin binding. In addition, we report the discovery of a new cofilin binding site (site 2) from residues 112-125 that form a helix toward the upper, rear surface of subdomain 1 in the standard actin orientation (Kabsch, W., Mannherz, H. G., Suck, D., Pai, E. F., and Holmes, K. C. (1990) Nature 347, 37-44). We propose that cofilin binds "behind" one monomer and "in front" of the other longitudinally associated monomer, accounting for the fact that cofilin alters the twist in the actin (McGough, A., Pope, B., Chiu, W., and Weeds, A. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 771-781). The characterization of the cofilin-actin interface will facilitate an understanding of how cofilin severs and depolymerizes filaments and may shed light on the mechanism of the gelsolin family because they share a similar fold with the cofilins (Hatanaka, H., Ogura, K., Moriyama, K., Ichikawa, S., Yahara, I., and Inagiki, F. (1996) Cell 85, 1047-1055).

The effect of Mg 2+ions on the conformation of G-actin and in particular on the accessibility of its antigenic regions has been tested. Experiments were performed with G-actin coupled to Sepharose 4B which was, therefore, maintained in the monomeric state. The results presented her show that the 2mM MgCl 2-perturbed antigenic site is located in a central region of the actin sequence.

Structural differences between skeletal-muscle and aortic actins were studied by using biochemical and immunological approaches. By using proteinase digestion we found that three regions of actin show structural differences: (a) in the C-terminal part, (b) the region around residue 227 and (c) the region around residue 167. By using antibodies specific to particular actin conformations we can discriminate between monomeric and filamentous forms of the two actins. Our results show that the minor sequence variations of the N- and C-terminal regions induce structural change in these regions, but also some long-range structural variations in other regions.

A comparison of specific antibodies induced by unfolded actins modified either by oxidation or by arylation of lysine residues was reported. We have focused our work on binding properties with filamentous actin and located its preferential antigenic sites for the anti‐arylated‐actin antibodies in the C‐part of the molecule. An interference of anti‐oxidized actin antibodies upon actin polymerisation has also been reported.

The effect of Mg2+ions on the conformation of G‐actin and in particular on the accessibility of its antigenic regions has been tested. Experiments were performed with G‐actin coupled to Sepharose 4B which was, therefore, maintained in the monomeric state. The results presented her show that the 2mM MgCl2‐perturbed antigenic site is located in a central region of the actin sequence.

The topology of the interfaces between actin monomers in microfilaments and three glycolytic enzymes (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, aldolase and phosphofructokinase) was investigated using several specific antibodies directed against precisely located sequences in actin. A major contact area for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was characterized in a region near residue 103. This interaction altered, by long-range conformational changes, the reactivity of antigenic epitopes in the C-terminal part of actin. The interface between actin and aldolase appeared to involve a sequence around residue 299 in the C-terminal region of actin. The interaction of phosphofructokinase, in contrast, modified the reactivity of all antibodies tested. Finally, the phosphagen kinases arginine kinase and creatine kinase showed no interaction with the microfilament.

The implication of part of the C-terminal of actin (within the 285-375 sequence) in the interaction of serum gelsolin was investigated by the use of specific antibodies. These antibodies were directed against two or three discrete epitopes, one of which was specific for skeletal-muscle actin. Some of these epitopes were found to be near the serum gelsolin-actin interface. Thus it can be assumed that part of the C-terminal of actin is exposed at the barbed end of the actin filament. The interaction between tropomyosin and actin was also studied.

The topography of the rigor complex between subfragment-1 (S-1) of myosin and actin was investigated by using several specific antibodies directed to well-located sequences in actin. A major contact area for S-1 was characterized in the hydrophilic 18-28 constant sequence, and the variable 1-7 sequence was only found to be in close proximity to the interface. The C-terminal extremity of actin situated around Cys-374 appeared to be included in a region close to the S-1 heavy chain and the N-terminal part of actin. The interaction between tropomyosin and actin was also studied. Neither of the terminal parts of actin were involved in this interaction. Thus, the regions involved in the interactions of S-1 and tropomyosin with actin do not overlap.

We have determined the specificity of sera elicited by glutaraldehyde-stabilized bovine aortic actin. This modification induces a high titre of antibodies directed against the N-terminal (residues 1-39) and the C-terminal region of smooth-muscle actins. The crude antisera were purified on peptide (corresponding to the 1-9 or 1-8 N-terminal sequences of smooth-muscle isoactins)-polyacrylic-resin columns. By fractionating the antisera we obtained oligoclonal antibody populations specific for each isoactin.

The antigenicity of the N-terminal region of skeletal-muscle actin was analysed. Two epitopes, corresponding to the 1-7 and 18-28 sequences, were determined. The antibodies specific for the first epitope discriminate skeletal-muscle actin from cardiac-muscle and smooth-muscle actins. The antibodies specific for the second epitope interact with all the actins tested, ranging from invertebrate to higher-vertebrate actins.

Structural and functional properties in two striated-muscle actins, one from a vertebrate, the other from an invertebrate (scallop), were compared in relation to a smooth-muscle actin isoform (aortic actin). In spite of differences in the variable N-terminal region, the two striated-muscle isoactins showed, in contrast with aortic actin, a large structural homology revealed by proteinase-susceptibility and interaction with the myosin head. Thus the myosin head may bind to the two striated-muscle actins in constant parts of the 18-113 sequence. In contrast, antigenic reactivity of conformational epitopes of these actins strongly differentiated scallop actin from the two others. The behaviour of the scallop actin appears to be related to several amino acid substitutions located near or at functional domains such as monomer-monomer binding site, DNAase-I-dependent actin-actin binding site and actin-severing domain, which modified the polypeptide chain exposure.