Search

We propose a telemedicine framework for remote and manufacturer independent pacemaker (PM) follow-up. The main goal is to provide the caregiver at the point-of-care with an efficient screening method to identify possible malfunction of the pacing system in collaboration with the specialist at the PM clinic. The concept was evaluated in a clinical trial on 44 patients (mean age 76 years). A total of 62 electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings were transmitted using a mobile PM follow-up unit. Using the automatic classification algorithm, 32 PMs were classified as 'OK' and eight PMs were classified as 'not OK'. In four cases a prediction regarding the working status of the PM was not possible. The signal processing classification was confirmed by expert classification (manual review of the ECG). The results indicate that the proposed PM follow-up concept has the potential to work as an efficient screening method and may spare a significant number of patients the burden of having to travel to specialized PM clinics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and severely compromised left ventricular ejection fraction are at high risk to die from sudden cardiac death. The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator implantation Trial II (MADIT II) shows a significant benefit of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy compared to standard treatment alone in this selected group of patients. The objective of the present study was to investigate the number of patients who will fulfil the MADIT II criteria and are candidates for prophylactic ICD implantation., Methods and Material: From January to December 2001 a total of 2653 patients underwent coronary angiography at our institution due to angina pectoris, positive exercise stress testing, pathological SPECT myocardial perfusion images, suspected dilated cardiomyopathy or ventricular arrhythmias. According to the MADIT II inclusion criteria patients with significant coronary artery disease (diameter stenosis > 50%), ejection fraction < 0.31% and previous myocardial infarction were included. Exclusion criteria were acute coronary syndromes, patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias or an existing indication for ICD therapy, and patients with coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty within the past or following three months., Results: Out of 2653 patients 185 (7%) had an ejection fraction less than 0.31, 149 (5.6%) showed significant coronary artery stenosis and 70 (2.6%) patients fulfilled the MADIT II criteria. The mean age of these patients was 68 +/- 9 years, the left ventricular ejection fraction 24 +/- 6. In 37 patients an ICD system was implanted according to the existing guidelines. 70 patients met the MADIT II inclusion criteria, resulting in an increase of 189% of ICD implantations per year., Conclusion: 2.6% out of 2653 patients who were referred to coronary angiography fulfilled the criteria of MADIT II. The expanding indication for ICD therapy will result in an annual increase of 70 (189%) prophylactic ICD implantations in our study population.