Search

Purpose: Managing persistent epistaxis poses a great challenge for the otolaryngologist. Despite continuous development in treatment methods, no universal guideline has been commonly adopted. Among the popular methods is endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation (ESPAL). This study aims to evaluate the impact of ESPAL integration on persistent epistaxis management over 15 years in a single academic center., Methods: A retrospective study including all cases who were hospitalized due to persistent epistaxis and required intervention between 2000 and 2016. From 2011, ESPAL was routinely utilized in our center, hence the study population was divided based on admission year, prior to 2011 (pre-ESPAL) and from 2011 till the end of data collection (post-ESPAL)., Results: The pre-ESPAL group included 87 interventions and the post-ESPAL group 54 interventions. Electrocautery remained the most common intervention in both periods. However, ESPAL incorporation was accompanied by a significant decline in the use of posterior nasal packing in the post-ESPAL group. The hemoglobin recovery levels and the mortality rates were significantly improved in the post-ESPAL group compared with the pre-ESPAL group despite higher comorbidity rates among the post-ESPAL patients., Conclusions: This study demonstrates the shifting trend in managing persistent epistaxis, and suggests that ESPAL has successfully replaced posterior nasal packing. These findings may encourage clinicians to consider ESPAL as a valuable tool in the management of persistent epistaxis., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)