Search

Shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic shoulder arthritis and rotator cuff arthropathy. Although there have been reports of variations in complication rates according to insurance type, few studies have examined the effect of payer status on functional outcomes. Patients who underwent elective shoulder arthroplasty performed by a single fellowship-trained surgeon and had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up were queried. Patient characteristics were compared across insurance types. Each patient completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. A generalized linear mixed model was specified to predict ASES score at 1 year and included preoperative ASES score as an adjustment variable. A total of 84 patients underwent 91 procedures. Before surgery, ASES score differed by insurance type (P=.014), with lower scores in the Medicaid cohort compared with the private insurance cohort (20.4 vs 38.8, P=.009). After controlling for baseline ASES score, postoperative ASES score at 1-year follow-up differed by insurance type (P<.001). Patients with private insurance had better ASES scores (85.6) than patients with Medicaid (55.2) (P<.001) and workers' compensation (57.1) (P=.028). Patients with Medicare (80.6) had better ASES scores at follow-up compared with those with Medicaid (P<.001). Patients with Medicaid are at risk for significantly lower postoperative functional outcome scores after shoulder arthroplasty compared with patients with private insurance and Medicare. In this study, patients with Medicaid had lower preoperative ASES scores compared with other groups. These observed differences are likely multifactorial and should be acknowledged when counseling patients. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e523-e528.]., (Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.)

Background: The purposes of this study were to evaluate patient outcomes after revision of hemiarthroplasty to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) based on initial pathology, to determine the re-revision rate, and to identify characteristics that may predict subsequent re-revision., Methods: A total of 207 shoulder hemiarthroplasty, bipolar prosthesis, and humeral resurfacing cases revised to RSA between January 2004 and January 2017 were reviewed. Outcome measures included shoulder motion and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores. Sixteen RSAs underwent re-revision. A case-control study with each revised RSA matched to 4 controls based on age, sex, and minimum 2-year follow-up was performed to evaluate for factors predicting re-revision., Results: The mean time from initial hemiarthroplasty to RSA was 3.6 years (range, 0.1-20 years). There were 114 patients with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up (mean, 57 months; range, 24-144 months). The most common initial diagnoses for hemiarthroplasty were fracture (n = 72), cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) (n = 22), and osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 20). Overall mean scores and range-of-motion values were as follows: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 54-64); SST score, 4 (95% CI, 4-5); forward flexion, 106° (95% CI, 96°-116°); and abduction, 95° (95% CI, 85°-105°). Compared with fracture cases, CTA cases had better forward flexion (P = .01) and abduction (P = .006) and OA cases had better SST scores (P = .02) and abduction (P = .04). The re-revision rate was 7.7% at a mean of 31 months (range, 0-116 months), with the most common diagnosis being fracture (10 of 16 cases). Humeral loosening (8 of 16 cases) was the most common failure mechanism, and larger glenosphere sizes were more likely to be revised., Conclusion: Functional outcome scores of hemiarthroplasty cases revised to RSA were better for patients with OA than for patients with CTA or fracture. Cases of hemiarthroplasty for fracture had decreased motion after revision to RSA compared with CTA and OA. Humeral loosening was the most common failure mechanism., (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: As surgeons' confidence in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) increases, they may tend to offer RSA earlier in the course of glenohumeral joint disease. This study evaluates the changes in the "tipping point" for primary RSA over a 10-year period to evaluate changes in practice., Methods: A total of 3975 primary RSAs performed over a 10-year period were retrospectively reviewed from a multi-institutional database. Of these, 3536 primary RSAs with preoperative diagnoses of osteoarthritis with rotator cuff deficiency (1626), irreparable rotator cuff tear (396), and rotator cuff tear arthropathy (1514) were included in the analysis. Preoperative range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used to calculate tipping points for each subgroup on a yearly basis over a 10-year period, and assessed for changes over time., Results: PROMs (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Simple Shoulder Test) and the Constant score remained similar over the 10-year study period, with all demonstrating slightly higher tipping points later in the study. ROM measures (forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation) all showed small increases over time, demonstrating better ROM before electing to undergo RSA in later years., Conclusions: With the increasing use of RSA over the last decade, the ROM tipping point for patients electing to undergo surgery has increased, whereas the PROM tipping point has remained stable. This indicates that patients undergoing RSA in the present have greater ROM preoperatively compared with 10 years ago; however, their perceived disability remains similar. Surgeons and patients continue to pursue RSA at a similar preoperative morbidity over the last 10 years., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Although shoulder arthroplasty is less common than knee or hip arthroplasty, the number of procedures being performed is increasing rapidly. The treatment effect is a simple method to measure outcome of joint replacement. The method was applied to measure results of total hip/knee arthroplasty but not yet for shoulder arthroplasty., Methods: Included were patients with unilateral cuff arthropathy (Hamada grades > = 2) treated with reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in this prospective multicenter study. The patients were assessed with the ASES questionnaire. The treatment effects (TE) was calculated for each patient. TE = score reduction/baseline score. A positive TE means amelioration, TE = 0 unchanged, and a negative TE means worse. The primary aim was to calculate the TE's for RSA at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months postoperatively. The secondary aim was to analyze the influence of confounders (preoperative Hamada grade, age, gender, dominance, side of the affected shoulder, general co-morbidities measured using ASA grade)., Results: Two hundred three patients were included for this analysis of whom 183 patients had a complete 2 year follow up. Two years postoperatively the mean ASES score augmented significant from 20.5 to 78.7 (p < 0.001). The 2 year TE's ranged from 1 to 0.09. We had no patient with a negative TE. A higher Hamada grade was associated with better TE's (Hamada grade 4+ vs. 2, p-value 0.042). For age and dominant side there were weak associations where those aged 80+ and dominant side had better TE's. The patients with higher ASA grade had lower TE's (ASA grade 4+ vs. 1, p-value 0.013). The mean TE's were 0.77 at 6-months, 0.81 at 1 year, 0.76 at 2 years and 0.73 at 5 years., Conclusions: The outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be measured with the treatment effect method; the 2 years TE's vary from 1 to 0.09. The mean treatment effects change little in the first five postoperative years (from 0.73 to 0.81). The confounders for better TE's were: higher severity of cuff arthropathy (Hamada grade 3, 4 and 5), less co-morbidities (ASA Grade 1), higher age (80+) and dominant side. Gender did not influence the 2-year TE's., Trial Registration: Comité intercantonal d'éthique (Jura, Fribourg, Neuchâtel), number 01/2008, 24.09.2008.

Background: Little is known about the cortical-like and cancellous bone density variations in superiorly eroded glenoids due to cuff tear arthropathy. The purpose of this study was to analyze regional bone density in type E2 glenoids., Methods: Clinical shoulder computed tomography scans were obtained from 32 patients with a type E2 superior erosion (10 men and 22 women; mean age, 73 years). Measurement regions were organized into quadrants (superior, inferior, anterior, and posterior) and depth regions. The depth regions were incremented by 2 mm from 0 to 10 mm. A repeated-measures multiple analysis of variance was performed to assess differences and interactions between mean densities (cortical-like and cancellous bone) in each depth, in each quadrant, and between sexes., Results: The lowest cancellous bone density was found in the inferior glenoid quadrant compared with all other quadrants (307 ± 50 Hounsfield units [HU], P < .001). At the glenoid surface, the superior quadrant contained the highest mean density for cortical-like bone (895 ± 97 HU); this differed significantly from the posterior, anterior, and inferior quadrants (P ≤ .033). As for depth of measurement, cortical-like bone was most dense at the glenoid surface (0-2 mm, 892 ± 91 HU), and density decreased significantly at depths greater than 2 mm (P ≤ .019)., Conclusion: In patients with type E2 glenoids due to cuff tear arthropathy, the densest bone was found in the superior quadrant in the area of erosion. The inferior quadrant, which tends to be unloaded as the humeral head migrates superiorly, had the lowest density bone. In addition, the best-quality bone was located at the glenoid surface as compared with deeper in the vault., (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a widely accepted treatment for irreparable massive rotator cuff tear (mRCT) and cuff tear arthropathy (CTA), but its impact on activities of daily living (ADLs) remains unclear., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients (age range, 54-87 years; follow-up range, 36.1-120.3 months) with irreparable mRCT and CTA treated by medialized RSA between 2008 and 2015. Ten activities considered essential for daily living were selected and scored from 0 to 3., Results: The mean visual analog scale scores during motion and University of California at Los Angeles and Constant scores significantly improved at final follow-up (all P < .001). Active forward flexion, external rotation at the side, and internal rotation to the posterior (IRp) were 92.5%, 79.6%, and 48.4% of the contralateral side, respectively, at final follow-up. Active forward flexion and external rotation at the side recovered within 6 months after surgery, similar to the level at final follow-up, but IRp did not reach the preoperative status until final follow-up. ADLs with mean scores of less than 2.0 at final follow-up were "wash the opposite shoulder," "wash the opposite axilla," "use a back pocket," "manage the toilet," and "wash the back" (only 36.4% of patients were able to wash their back at final follow-up)., Conclusions: RSA for irreparable mRCT and CTA showed satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, IRp was associated with a limited range compared with the other shoulder motions; therefore, all ADLs associated with internal rotation demonstrated lower recovery rates than expected., (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The main limits of the Grammont design reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are loss of external rotation and scapular notching. They can be addressed with glenoid or humeral lateralization. The aim of the study was to compare outcomes of lateralized bony increased-offset RSA (BIO-RSA) vs. standard RSA in patients with an onlay 145° curved stem., Methods: A comparative cohort study of 29 standard RSAs and 30 BIO-RSAs was performed. At 2 years postoperatively, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, visual analog scale score, range of motion, and radiographs were evaluated. After comparison between the groups, patients were analyzed considering patients younger and older than 65 years., Results: All parameters significantly improved after surgery in both groups. Postoperatively, the 2 groups did not show any clinical and radiographic differences (P > .05). In patients <66 years, BIO-RSA showed a significantly higher value of external rotation (49° ± 12° vs. 30° ± 19° [P = .025], elbow at side; 81° ± 17° vs. 56° ± 22° [P = .016], elbow at 90° of abduction) and a positive trend for all other parameters (P > .05). In patients >65 years, standard technique showed a positive trend for all the parameters (P > .05). No other significant differences were found., Conclusions: At 2 years of follow-up, the use of standard RSA or BIO-RSA in an implant with an onlay 145° curved stem provided similar outcomes. The humeral lateralization alone is sufficient to decrease notching and to improve external rotation. BIO-RSA increases external rotation in patients between 50 and 65 years old. Glenoid bone graft in RSA has a high incorporation rate (completed in 90%)., (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The present study aimed to compare the isometric strength and endurance of shoulder abduction and internal and external rotation between operated shoulders and nonoperated, contralateral shoulders of patients who underwent reverse shoulder replacement due to unilateral rotator cuff tear arthropathy., Patients and Methods: With a diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy, 41 consecutive patients (mean age of 70.8 years; age range, 57 to 84; 36 females, 5 males) who underwent unilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty were reviewed based on functional and radiological data. In all cases, cuff tear arthropathy was unilateral and contralateral shoulder was asymptomatic, with normal shoulder function. The average length of follow-up was 34 months (range of 12-67). To assess patients' functional level, the Constant score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (the Quick-DASH) outcome measure were used preoperatively and at the final examination. The primary outcomes of the present study were measurement of isokinetic strength and endurance of shoulder abduction and internal and external rotation using an isokinetic evaluator., Results: Patients exhibited marked improvement in functional level as reflected by a significant increase in the mean Constant score from 38 preoperatively to 65 at the final follow-up (p = 0.03). The functional improvement was supported by a decrease in the mean Quick-DASH from 64 preoperatively to 26 at the final follow-up (p = 0.018). In the comparison of the isokinetic strength and endurance of shoulder abduction, no statistical difference was observed between operated shoulders and contralateral shoulders (p > 0.05). However; the strength and endurance of internal and external rotation were lower in operated shoulders than in contralateral shoulders (p < 0.05). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in comparisons of the durability of abduction (p > 0.05); however, the durability of internal and external rotation were significantly lower in operated shoulders (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: In terms of durability and strength of abduction, similar results with the unaffected shoulder may be accomplished; nonetheless, the surgeon should be aware that durability and strength of rotation would be weak., Level of Evidence: Level III, Therapeutic Study., (Copyright © 2019 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair on function, pain and range of motion at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow ups., Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials., Setting: Clinical setting., Participants: Patients 18 years and older with a rotator cuff tear., Intervention/comparison: Arthroscopic/mini-open rotator cuff repair surgery followed by post operative rehabilitation., Main Outcome Measures: Function and pain., Results: Six RCTs (n = 670) were included. The pooled results, demonstrated no significant difference between arthroscopic and mini open approach to rotator cuff repair on function (very low quality, 4 RCTs, 495 patients, SMD 0.00, 3-month; very low quality, 4 RCTs, 495 patients, SMD -0.01, 6-month; very low quality, 3 RCTs, 462 patients, SMD -0.09, 12-months). For pain, the pooled results, were not statistically different between groups (very low quality, 3 RCTs, 254 patients, MD -0.21, 3-month; very low quality, 3 RCTs, 254 patients, MD -0.03, 6-month; very low quality, 2 RCTs, 194 patients, MD -0.35, 12-months)., Conclusion: The effects of arthroscopic compared to mini-open rotator cuff repair, on function, pain and range of motion are too small to be clinically important at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow ups., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of nerve injury with neuromonitoring during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty., Materials: This study included 15 shoulders of 15 patients (11 females and 4 males) who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The mean age was 74.8 ± 4.4 years. Nine shoulders had cuff tear arthropathy, 4 had massive rotator cuff tears, 2 had osteoarthritis, and 1 had rheumatoid arthritis. The somatosensory evoked potentials of the median nerve, transcranial motor evoked potentials, and free-electromyograms from 6 upper-extremity muscles were measured intraoperatively. We defined a nerve alert as 50% amplitude attenuation or 10% latency prolongation of the somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranial motor evoked potentials and sustained neurotonic discharge on free-electromyogram., Results: Thirty-one alerts were recorded in 11 patients. The axillary nerve was associated with 17 alerts. Eleven alerts occurred during the glenoid procedure and 5 alerts occurred during the humeral procedure. One patient who did not recover from the alert of the axillary nerve had clinically incomplete paralysis of the deltoid muscle., Conclusion: The present findings suggest that the axillary nerve was the nerve most frequently exposed to the risk of injury, especially during glenoid and humeral implantation., (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The influence of diagnosis on outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is not completely understood. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of different pathologies., Methods: A total of 699 RSAs were performed for the following diagnoses: (1) rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCA), (2) massive cuff tear (MCT) with osteoarthritis (OA), (3) MCT without OA, (4) OA, (5) acute proximal humeral fracture, (6) malunion, (7) nonunion, and (8) inflammatory arthropathy. All patients had minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (mean, 47 months; range, 24-155 months). Range of motion, Simple Shoulder Test scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, visual analog scale scores for function, and health-related quality-of-life measures were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively., Results: The RCA, MCT-with-OA, MCT-without-OA, and OA groups all exhibited significant improvements in all outcome scores and in all planes of motion from preoperatively until a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. The malunion, nonunion, and inflammatory arthropathy groups showed improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, forward flexion, and abduction. The average changes for all other outcomes and planes of motions were also positive but did not reach statistical significance. After adjustment for age and compared with RCA, female patients with malunion had significantly poorer forward flexion (P < .05), those with OA had significantly better abduction (P < .05), and those with fractures had significantly worse patient satisfaction (P < .05). Among male patients, those with MCTs without OA had significantly worse satisfaction (P < .05)., Conclusion: RSA reliably provides improvement regardless of preoperative diagnosis. Although subtle differences exist between male and female patients, improvements in clinical outcome scores were apparent after RSA., (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cuff tear arthropathy is commonly managed with a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). A humeral hemiarthroplasty with an extended humeral head may provide a less invasive alternative for selected patients with cuff tear arthropathy if the shoulder has preserved active elevation. Because evidence regarding this procedure is limited, we investigated its safety and efficacy in treating selected patients with cuff tear arthropathy., Methods: We analyzed the preoperative characteristics, surgical findings, and clinical outcomes for patients selected for extended head hemiarthroplasty., Results: For 42 patients with 2-year follow-up, there were no complications or revisions. The Simple Shoulder Test score improved from a median of 3.0 to 8.0 (P < .001). The median percentage of maximal possible improvement was 50% (P < .001). The percentage of patients able to perform each of the functions of the Simple Shoulder Test was significantly improved; for example, the ability to sleep comfortably increased from 19% to 71%, and the ability to place a coin on the shelf at shoulder level increased from 38% to 86% (P < .001)., Conclusions: There are circumstances in which RTSA is clearly the preferred procedure for cuff tear arthropathy, including pseudoparalysis, anterosuperior escape, and glenohumeral instability; however, in shoulders with preserved active motion and stability of the humeral head provided by an intact coracoacromial arch, the extended head humeral arthroplasty can enable selected patients to realize improved comfort and function without the potential risks of RTSA. Extended humeral head hemiarthroplasty can provide a safe and effective alternative for the management of selected patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy and preserved active motion., (Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective:: To compare psychometric properties of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Constant-Murley scale, in patients with degenerative rotator cuff disease (DRCD)., Design:: Longitudinal cohort., Setting:: One French university hospital., Methods:: The scales were applied twice at one-week interval before physiotherapy and once after physiotherapy two months later. The perceived improvement after treatment was self-assessed on a numerical scale (0-4). The test-retest reliability of the DASH, SPADI and Constant-Murley scales was assessed before treatment by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The responsiveness was assessed by the paired t-test ( P < 0.05) and standardized mean difference (SMD). The correlation between the percentage of variation in scale scores and the self-assessed improvement score after treatment was measured by the Spearman coefficient., Results:: Fifty-three patients were included. Twenty-six only were available for reliability. The test-retest reliability was very good for the DASH (ICC = 0.97), SPADI (0.95) and Constant-Murley (0.92). The scale score was improved after treatment for each scale ( P < 0.05). The SMD was moderate for the DASH (0.56) and SPADI (0.56) scales, and small for the Constant-Murley (0.44). The correlation between the percentage of variation in scores and self-assessed improvement score after treatment was high, moderate and not significant for the SPADI (0.59, P < 0.0001), DASH (0.42, P < 0.01) and Constant-Murley scales, respectively., Conclusion:: The test-retest reliability of the DASH, SPADI and Constant-Murley scales is very good for patients with DRCD. The highest responsiveness was achieved with the SPADI.

An active 72-year-old woman presented with pain, weakness, and decreased range of motion in her right shoulder. After a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and 6 months of physical therapy, she was able to return to full activity level without pain.

Background: Neurologic pre- and postoperative injuries to the axillary and/or suprascapular nerve (SSN) have a higher incidence than expected and may lead to significantly decreased functional outcomes and increased risk of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) failure., Methods: Patients who underwent a RSA for rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCTA) were included from December 2014 to December 2015. This study focused on the clinical (Constant score), radiographic, and pre- and postoperative electromyographic evaluations at 3 and 6 months., Results: Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria. One was lost to follow-up. Preoperatively, 15 patients showed changes on electromyography (9 SSN and 15 axillary nerve lesions); all of them were chronic and disuse injuries. The mean preoperative relative Constant score (rCS) of all included patients was 39 ± 9 (range, 19-64). At 3 months postsurgery, the prevalence of acute injuries for both nerves was 31.5%. At 6 months postsurgery, 2 axillary nerve injuries and 6 SSN injuries remain unchanged, and the rest improved or normalized. The mean postsurgery rCS of the entire cohort at 6-month follow-up was 78 ± 6.5. Mean postoperative rCS for acute postoperative nerve injury was 71 ± 3 for the axillary nerve and 64 ± 5 for SSN., Conclusions: Axillary and SSN injuries in RCTA have a much higher incidence than expected. Most of these axillary lesions are transient, with an almost complete recovery seen on electromyography at 6 months and with scarce functional impact. However, SSN lesions appear to behave differently, with poor functional results and having a lower potential for a complete recovery., (Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Glenohumeral arthrodesis is associated with a high rate of complications. Although patients experience reasonable pain relief and shoulder stability, they experience marked limitations in their upper-extremity function. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes of glenohumeral arthrodesis., Methods: Twenty-nine patients with 29 affected shoulders underwent primary glenohumeral arthrodesis between 1992 and 2009. Surgical indications included rotator cuff arthropathy and pseudoparalysis (n = 7), neurologic injuries (n = 12), chronic infection (n = 3), recurrent dislocations (n = 3), and proximal humeral or shoulder girdle tumors (n = 4). Surgical fixation techniques included plates and screws in 18 patients and screws only in 11 patients., Results: All patients were examined, with a mean follow-up of 12 years (range, 2 to 22 years). Twelve patients (41%) had postoperative complications, including 6 periprosthetic fractures, 7 nonunions, and 3 infections. Eleven patients (38%) required additional surgical procedures after arthrodesis, including revision internal fixation to achieve glenohumeral fusion after nonunions (n = 7), irrigation and debridement with antibiotic treatment for deep infections (n = 2), open reduction and internal fixation to treat fracture (n = 2), and implant removal to treat symptomatic patients (n = 3). Patients experienced reasonable overall pain relief. The mean postoperative scores were 35 points for the Subjective Shoulder Value, 58 points for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and 54 points for the Short Form-36. Eighty-seven percent of patients reported postoperative limitations. Patients with neurologic injuries had worse functional outcomes, and an arthrodesis position of ≥25° yielded better functional outcomes., Conclusions: Glenohumeral arthrodesis is associated with a high rate of patients with complications (41%). Although patients experience reasonable pain relief and shoulder stability, they experience marked limitations in their upper-extremity function., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Purpose: The reverse shoulder prosthesis (RSP) was developed to relieve pain and improve functional outcomes in patients with glenohumeral arthritis and deficiency of the rotator cuff. Even if clinical and functional outcomes regarding the use of the RSP were reported by literature, data concerning progressive deltoid adaptation to this non-anatomic implant are still missing. The purpose of our study was to correlate clinical and functional outcomes with deltoid fibers activity and muscle fatigability in patients with reverse shoulder prosthesis at 2 years follow-up., Methods: Twenty patients with reverse shoulder prosthesis due to symptomatic deficient or nonfunctional rotator cuff associated with osteoarthritis were referred by Cervesi Hospital Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Unit. Exclusion criteria were: axillary nerve palsy, a nonfunctioning deltoid muscle, diabetes, previous trauma, malignancy. Furthermore patients who received the RSP for revision arthroplasty, proximal humerus fractures were excluded. All the patients underwent clinical and functional evaluation with the support of electromyography measurement focused on deltoid activity., Results: RSP surgical treatment in shoulder osteoarthritis confirms his good outcome in terms of pain relief. At 2 years anterior and lateral deltoid electromyographic activity was significantly lower compared with contralateral side (p < 0.001). Posterior deltoid activity was no detectable. Range of motion at 2 years of follow-up decreased in terms of forward flexion (p = 0.045), abduction (p = 0.03) and external rotation (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that even if the patients remain pain-free, progressive deterioration of the deltoid activity is unavoidable and may lead to poor functional outcomes overtime.

Background: Gender differences may exist for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. Limited data suggest that women may have worse preoperative disability and outcomes. Our objective was to determine whether gender influences preoperative disability and patient-reported outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty., Methods: Data were prospectively collected for patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff arthropathy or osteoarthritis with a rotator cuff tear at a single institution between 2009 and 2015. Range of motion, visual analog scale, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were collected at the preoperative, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative time points. Data were analyzed using multivariate mixed-effect regression analysis., Results: There were 117 patients included. Men and women had similar demographics, preoperative range of motion, pain, and function. Length of stay was similar (men, 2.32 days; women, 2.58 days; P = .18). Controlling for patient variables, men achieved higher ASES function (P = .009) and SF-12 Physical Component Summary (P = .008) scores compared with women. There was no difference between men and women in ASES pain and SF-12 Mental Component Summary scores, visual analog scale score, or range of motion., Conclusion: Improvements in pain and range of motion were similar in men and women; however, men achieved higher ASES function and SF-12 Physical Component Summary scores. Women may be more functionally impaired on the basis of differences in activities of daily living. These results may be used to guide discussion about expected benefits after reverse shoulder arthroplasty., (Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objective: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff arthropathy patients, improves anteversion and abduction, but not rotational, outcomes. The main aim of this study is to determine its repercussions on daily life activities in our patients., Material and Methods: Between 2009 and 2011 we implanted 210 shoulder arthroplasties, 126 of them were reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in a rotator cuff arthropathy context. About 88% were women, with a mean age at time of surgery of 81 years, 95% were retired. The mean follow up was 53 months. The Constant scale, Visual Analogue Scale, Charlson Comorbidity Index, range of motion were measured for each patient and whether they could manage 40 daily life activities by means of a new questionnaire, classifying them according toshoulder functional demand., Results and Discussion: Mean normalized by sex and age Constant value was 81.2%. Mean Visual Analogue Scale and Charlson Index were 3.56 and 1.69 respectively. Improvement in anteversion and abduction, not in rotational range of motion. Limitation was found in low and high functional demand activities in 20% and 51% respectively, especially those which involved internal rotation., Conclusion: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty treatment for RCA in the elderly, achieves adequate pain management and good functional outcomes. Nevertheless, an important risk of DLA limitation must be accepted in those which involve internal rotation or shoulder high functional demand., (Copyright © 2017 SECOT. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Long-term results regarding tear progression, arthropathy, and clinical scores of unrepaired rotator cuff tears are largely unknown. This study investigated whether the condition of the glenohumeral joint and rotator cuff had deteriorated at a minimum of 20 years after an acromioplasty without cuff repair and assessed the clinical results., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of a consecutive series of patients treated between 1989 and 1993 with acromioplasty without cuff repair due to subacromial pain and cuff tear. At follow-up results of x-ray, ultrasonography, and clinical scores were recorded., Results: At a mean of 22 years (range, 21-25 years), 69 patients were available for follow-up with Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, Constant-Murley (CM) score, x-ray, and ultrasonography. Mean age at operation was 49 years (range, 19-69 years). There were 45 partial-thickness tears (PTT) and 24 full-thickness tears (FTT). Of 23 patients with FTT, 17 (74% with x-ray) had developed cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada ≥2) and 20 (87% with ultrasonography) had progressed in tear size. Mean relative CM in patients with FTT and cuff tear arthropathy was 62 (standard deviation [SD], 27), and the mean WORC was 58% (SD, 26%). In the 43 PTT patients, 3 (7% with x-ray) had developed cuff tear arthropathy and 16 (42% with ultrasonography) had tear progression. With PTT at follow-up, the mean relative CM was 101 (SD, 22), and the mean WORC was 81% (SD, 20%)., Conclusions: After an acromioplasty, most unrepaired full-thickness tears will, in long-term, increase in size and be accompanied by cuff tear arthropathy changes. Most partial thickness tears remain unchanged; cuff tear arthropathy is rare, and clinical scores generally good., (Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Milwaukee shoulder syndrome (MSS) is a rare, rapidly destructive arthropathy associated with calcium hydroxyapatite crystal deposition. This condition is a combination of rotator cuff tear, osteoarthritic changes, noninflammatory joint effusion containing crystals, synovial hyperplasia, cartilage and subchondral bone destruction, and multiple osteochondral loose bodies. This article discusses pathophysiology, clinical presentation, differential considerations, and magnetic resonance imaging findings of MSS.

Background: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire was developed to provide a standardized method for evaluating shoulder function. Previous studies have determined the clinical responsiveness of this outcome measure for heterogenous populations or patients with nonoperatively treated rotator cuff disease. Currently, to our knowledge, no studies exist that establish the clinically relevant change in the ASES score after shoulder arthroplasty., Questions/purposes: We asked: (1) What are the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the ASES score after primary and reverse shoulder arthroplasties? (2) Are the MCID and SCB for the ASES score different between primary and reverse shoulder arthroplasties? (3) What patient-related factors are associated with achieving the MCID and SCB after total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?, Methods: A longitudinally maintained institutional shoulder arthroplasty registry was retrospectively queried for patients who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty, including anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from 2007 to 2013, with a minimum 2-year followup. Seven hundred ninety-four patients were identified and eligible; 304 of these patients did not have 2 years of followup or complete datasets, resulting in a study cohort of 490 patients (62% of the 794 potentially eligible). The MCID and SCB of the ASES score for these patients was calculated using an anchor-based method, using four different anchors measuring satisfaction with work, activities, overall, and activity from the SF-36. The MCID (anchored to somewhat satisfied) and SCB (very satisfied) of the ASES score were calculated for the entire cohort and stratified by arthroplasty type. Multivariate logistic regression of patient-related factors that influence the MCID and SCB achievement was performed., Results: The MCID for all patients combined ranged from 6.3 to 13.5; for the overall satisfaction anchor, the MCID was 13.5 ± 4.5 (95% CI, 4.8-22.3). The SCB for the overall cohort ranged from 12.0 to 36.6; for the overall satisfaction anchor, the SCB was 36.6 ± 3.8 (95% CI, 29.1-44.1). There were no differences in the MCID of the ASES score between anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for any of the anchors (p = 0.159-0.992) or the SCB for any of the anchors (p = 0.467-0.977). Combining anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in one group, higher preoperative ASES score (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98; p < 0.001), having a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.85; p = 0.016), and having rheumatoid arthritis were independent predictors of not achieving an MCID for the ASES 2 years after surgery. Higher preoperative ASES score (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.92; p < 0.001), a diagnosis of rotator cuff tear arthropathy (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.30; p < 0.001), a diagnosis of back pain (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.71); p = 0.002), and living alone (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.69; p = 0.002) were all independent predictors of not achieving SCB after shoulder arthroplasty., Conclusions: Patients with glenohumeral arthritis or rotator cuff tear arthropathy who undergo primary conventional total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty and have at least a nine-point improvement in their ASES score experience a clinically important change, whereas those who have at least a 23-point improvement in their ASES score experience a substantial clinical benefit. High preoperative function was associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving clinically important change after total shoulder arthroplasty., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Background: In selected patients with a desire to maintain activity levels greater than those recommended after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty remains an option for treatment of cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). However, given the relatively small case series that have been reported to date, little is known regarding which patients will show functional improvement after this surgery., Questions/purposes: We asked: What factors are associated with achieving the minimum clinically important difference in the simple shoulder test (SST) after hemiarthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy?, Patients and Methods: Between 1991 and 2007, two surgeons at one academic center performed 48 shoulder hemiarthroplasties for CTA. No patients were known to have died before data collection, and of those not known to have died, 42 (88%) were available for followup at a mean of 48 months (range, 24-132 months). During that time, the general indications for this approach were glenohumeral arthritis with superior decentering of the humeral head. The majority of the patients with CTA were treated nonoperatively with patient-directed physical therapy and other modalities. A total of 42 patients (42 shoulders; 24 males and 18 females) with CTA were treated with hemiarthroplasty and followed for a mean of 48 months (range, 24-132 months). This is a retrospective study that made use of a longitudinally maintained database, which included physical examination of ROM, the SST, VAS, and standardized radiographs. At latest followup, 33 of 42 patients achieved a clinically important percentage of maximum possible improvement (%MPI) in SST score, defined as an improvement of 30% of the total possible improvement on the 12-point scale (with higher scores representing better results)., Results: Intraoperative findings of a rotator cuff tear limited to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus (odds ratio [OR], ∞; 95% CI, 2.01 to ∞; p = 0.020) and limited preoperative external rotation (15° [range, -40° to 45°] vs 35° [range, 20°-45°], OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.38-0.90; p < 0.001) were associated with achieving the defined minimum functional improvement (30% of MPI) on multivariate analysis. Preoperative active elevation (p = 0.679) and use of a CTA-specific implant (p = 0.707) were not significantly associated with achievement of 30% of MPI., Conclusion: Patients with intact teres minor and subscapularis tendons and patients with lower preoperative external rotation had a better prognosis for achieving a clinically important percentage of MPI at short-term followup. Although some patients were followed for more than 10 years, the majority were followed for fewer than 5 years; future studies will need to determine whether these early functional results are maintained for longer periods., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.