Search

Within drug development, high off-target promiscuity as well as potent cytotoxicity, are associated with a high attrition rate. We investigated the safety profile of novel plasmepsin X (PMX) inhibitors for the treatment of malaria. In our screening cascade, a total of 249 PMX compounds were profiled in a panel of in vitro secondary pharmacology assays containing 44 targets (SafetyScreen44 panel) and in a cytotoxicity assay in HepG2 cells using ATP as an endpoint. Six of the lead compounds were subsequently tested in a 7-d rat toxicology study, and/or in a cardiovascular study in guinea pigs. Overall, compounds with high cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells correlated with high promiscuity (off-target hit rate >20%) in the SafetyScreen44 panel and were associated with poor tolerability in vivo (decedents, morbidity, adverse clinical signs, or severe cardiovascular effects). Some side effects observed in rats or guinea pigs could putatively be linked with hits in the secondary pharmacological profiling, such as the M1 or M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, opioid µ and/or κ receptors or hERG/CaV1.2/Na+ channels, which were common to >50% the compounds tested in vivo. In summary, compounds showing high cytotoxicity and high promiscuity are likely to be poorly tolerated in vivo. However, such associations do not necessarily imply a causal relationship. Identifying the targets that cause these undesirable effects is key for early safety risk assessment. A tiered approach, based on a set of in vitro assays, helps selecting the compounds with highest likelihood of success to proceed to in vivo toxicology studies., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This appraisal of state-of-the-art manuscript highlights and expands upon the thoughts conveyed in the lecture of Dr. Jean-Pierre Valentin, recipient of the 2021 Distinguished Service Award of the Safety Pharmacology Society, given on the 2nd December 2021. The article reflects on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that surrounded the evolution of safety and secondary pharmacology over the last 3 decades with a particular emphasis on pharmaceutical drug development delivery, scientific and technological innovation, complexities of regulatory framework and people leadership and development. The article further built on learnings from past experiences to tackle constantly emerging issues and evolving landscape whilst being cognizant of the challenges facing these disciplines in the broader drug development and societal context., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The authors are employed by or on behalf of UCB Biopharma SRL and as such may have access to share / stocks options., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Plasmepsin X (PMX) is an essential aspartyl protease controlling malaria parasite egress and invasion of erythrocytes, development of functional liver merozoites (prophylactic activity), and blocking transmission to mosquitoes, making it a potential multistage drug target. We report the optimization of an aspartyl protease binding scaffold and the discovery of potent, orally active PMX inhibitors with in vivo antimalarial efficacy. Incorporation of safety evaluation early in the characterization of PMX inhibitors precluded compounds with a long human half-life ( t 1/2 ) to be developed. Optimization focused on improving the off-target safety profile led to the identification of UCB7362 that had an improved in vitro and in vivo safety profile but a shorter predicted human t 1/2 . UCB7362 is estimated to achieve 9 log 10 unit reduction in asexual blood-stage parasites with once-daily dosing of 50 mg for 7 days. This work demonstrates the potential to deliver PMX inhibitors with in vivo efficacy to treat malaria.

Introduction: Several compounds from a neuroscience project induced convulsions in animals, at low exposure levels via a hypothetical off-target mechanism. A set of in vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted in order to 1) identify the mechanism behind convulsions; 2) characterize the convulsions, 3) detect premonitory signs that could be monitored clinically, and 4) assess the development of tolerance after repeat dosing., Methods: Patch clamp assays were conducted on 12 different ion channels (e.g. sodium, potassium, calcium, AMPA, NMDA, GABA A and purinergic receptors) known to be associated with seizures, to identify the off-target culprit. A multiphase study was conducted with UCB-A and UCB-B in Beagle dogs telemetered for video EEG/EMG monitoring to further characterize the convulsive pattern. First, both compounds were administered by intravenous constant infusion (dose: 5 mg/kg/h) over 2 h. Thereafter, the same dogs received a daily oral administration of UCB-A (8 mg/kg/day) for 7 days., Results: Compounds inducing convulsions showed strong inhibitory activity on GABA A channels (IC 50 values <10 μM), whereas compounds with partial or no inhibitory effect on these channels did not induce seizures. In EEG experiments, convulsions were preceded by premonitory clinical signs (e.g. tremors, myoclonic jerks) and morphological EEG abnormalities (e.g. sharp waves, spike and wave patterns), confirming their CNS origin. No attenuation of the seizurogenic effects was observed over the 7-day treatment period., Discussion: A well-designed set of experiments including electrophysiological assays on seizure-related ion channels and EEG/EMG assessment in telemetered dogs allowed a proper seizure liability risk assessment, leading to a rapid no go decision for the two most advanced leads., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors have any conflict of interest, other than their employment in either a pharmaceutical company or contract research organizations. No information is presented in this paper that advocates for, or promotes, commercial products from any of their organizations., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Seletalisib is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) in clinical development for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. The present study investigated the role of P-gp in seletalisib disposition, especially brain distribution, and the associated risks of interactions. Seletalisib was found to be actively transported by rodent and human P-gp in vitro (transfected LLC-PK1 cells; K m of ca. 20 µM), with minimal or no affinity for the other tested transporters. A distribution study in knockout rats (single oral dosing at 750 mg kg -1 ) showed that P-gp restricts the brain disposition of seletalisib while having minimal effect on its intestinal absorption. Restricted brain penetration was also observed in cynomolgus monkeys (single oral dosing at 30 mg kg -1 ) using brain microdialysis and cerebrospinal fluid sampling (K p,uu of 0.09 and 0.24, respectively). These findings opened the question of potential pharmacokinetic interaction between seletalisib and P-gp inhibitors. In vitro, CsA inhibited the active transport of seletalisib with an IC 50 of 0.13 µM. In rats, co-administration of high doses of CsA (bolus iv followed by continuous infusion) increased the brain distribution of seletalisib (single oral dosing at 5 mg kg -1 ). The observed data were found aligned with those predicted by in vitro-in vivo extrapolation. Based on the same extrapolation method combined with literature data, only very few P-gp inhibitors (i.e. CsA, quinine, quinidine) were predicted to increase the brain disposition of seletalisib in the clinical setting (maximal 3-fold changes)., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Although the basic structure of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is similar across species, there are significant differences in the anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry between humans and laboratory animals, which should be taken into account when conducting a gastrointestinal (GI) assessment. Historically, the percentage of cases of drug attrition associated with GI-related adverse effects is small; however, this incidence has increased over the last few years. Drug-related GI effects are very diverse, usually functional in nature, and not limited to a single pharmacological class. The most common GI signs are nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and gastric ulceration. Despite being generally not life-threatening, they can greatly affect patient compliance and quality of life. There is therefore a real need for improved and/or more extensive GI screening of candidate drugs in preclinical development, which may help to better predict clinical effects. Models to identify drug effects on GI function cover GI motility, nausea and emesis liability, secretory function (mainly gastric secretion), and absorption aspects. Both in vitro and in vivo assessments are described in this chapter. Drug-induced effects on GI function can be assessed in stand-alone safety pharmacology studies or as endpoints integrated into toxicology studies. In silico approaches are also being developed, such as the gut-on-a-chip model, but await further optimization and validation before routine use in drug development. GI injuries are still in their infancy with regard to biomarkers, probably due to their greater diversity. Nevertheless, several potential blood, stool, and breath biomarkers have been investigated. However, additional validation studies are necessary to assess the relevance of these biomarkers and their predictive value for GI injuries.

The kidney is a complex excretory organ playing a crucial role in various physiological processes such as fluid and electrolyte balance, control of blood pressure, removal of waste products, and drug disposition. Drug-induced kidney injury (DIKI) remains a significant cause of candidate drug attrition during drug development. However, the incidence of renal toxicities in preclinical studies is low, and the mechanisms by which drugs induce kidney injury are still poorly understood. Although some in vitro investigational tools have been developed, the in vivo assessment of renal function remains the most widely used methodology to identify DIKI. Stand-alone safety pharmacology studies usually include assessment of glomerular and hemodynamic function, coupled with urine and plasma analyses. However, as renal function is not part of the ICH S7A core battery, such studies are not routinely conducted by pharmaceutical companies. The most common approach consists in integrating renal/urinary measurements in repeat-dose toxicity studies. In addition to the standard analyses and histopathological examination of kidneys, novel promising urinary biomarkers have emerged over the last decade, offering greater sensitivity and specificity than traditional renal parameters. Seven of these biomarkers have been qualified by regulatory agencies for use in rat toxicity studies.

A selective α2C -adrenoceptor (AR) agonist was developed for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The objective was to dissociate analgesic activity from cardiovascular and sedative side effects commonly observed with nonselective agents. A 2-amino-oxazoline derivative (compound A), identified as a dual α2C -AR agonist/α2A -AR antagonist in in vitro-binding assays, exhibited in vivo efficacy in rodent pain models. Its safety profile was compared with that of clonidine in six different in vivo models. Contrary to clonidine, compound A did not induce hypotension in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats, in conscious spontaneous hypertensive rats, or in telemetered dogs. Both agents induced similar dose-dependent decreases in heart rate in dogs and rats. In anesthetized pithed rats, clonidine showed dose-dependent hypertension and inhibited electrical nerve stimulation-induced tachycardia at doses close to its efficacious doses in the mouse formalin test, while compound A had much weaker vasoconstrictive and antichronotropic effects. Finally, in a mouse Irwin test, no sedation was observed with compound A at 30-fold its ED50 in the mouse formalin test, while sedative effects of clonidine started from three-fold its ED50 . These data confirm the advantageous safety profile of the new dual α2C -AR agonist/α2A -AR antagonist agent vs. the nonselective agonist clonidine., (© 2013 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) is a complexation agent used to enhance drug solubilization and formulation stability. Although its toxicity is well characterized, its cardiovascular effects are less known. To investigate them, HPβCD was infused intravenously over 10 min in anesthetized dogs (10-40% (w/v, i.e. 200-800 mg/kg) in non-denervated animals and at 40% in denervated animals). HPβCD increased renal arteriolar resistance and decreased renal blood flow at all doses, almost immediately after infusion start, more drastically in females. A less pronounced increase in total peripheral resistance occurred in females only due to sex difference in sympathetic tone. Pulmonary hemodynamic parameters remained unaffected, suggesting that the renal effect was rather selective. As a consequence of the increased systemic blood pressure, heart rate decreased in normal animals without direct effect on cardiac conductance. This effect was abolished in denervated animals. This suggests that autonomous nervous feedback loops are functional in normal animals and that HPβCD has no direct chronotropic effect. In conclusion, systemic and renal hemodynamic changes should be considered as potential background effects at 200-400 mg/kg. At higher doses (800 mg/kg), changes are more pronounced and could mask/exacerbate hemodynamic response of drug candidate; such doses should be avoided in nonclinical safety studies., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)