Search

von Willebrand disease (VWD) represents the most common inherited bleeding disorder. The majority of VWD cases are characterized by partial quantitative reductions in plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels. Management of patients with mild to moderate VWF reductions in the range of 30 to 50 IU/dL poses a common clinical challenge. Some of these low VWF patients present with significant bleeding problems. In particular, heavy menstrual bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage can cause significant morbidity. Conversely, however, many individuals with mild plasma VWF:Ag reductions do not have any bleeding sequelae. In contrast to type 1 VWD, most patients with low VWF do not have detectable pathogenic VWF sequence variants, and bleeding phenotype correlates poorly with residual VWF levels. These observations suggest that low VWF is a complex disorder caused by variants in other genes beyond VWF. With respect to low VWF pathobiology, recent studies have shown that reduced VWF biosynthesis within endothelial cells likely plays a key role. However, pathological enhanced VWF clearance from plasma has also been described in approximately 20% of low VWF cases. For low VWF patients who require hemostatic treatment prior to elective procedures, tranexamic acid and desmopressin have both been shown to be efficacious. In this article, we review the current state of the art regarding low VWF. In addition, we consider how low VWF represents an entity that appears to fall between type 1 VWD on the one hand and bleeding disorders of unknown cause on the other.

Prolonged recovery is common after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning Long COVID syndrome remain unknown. VWF/ADAMTS-13 imbalance, dysregulated angiogenesis, and immunothrombosis are hallmarks of acute COVID-19. We hypothesized that VWF/ADAMTS-13 imbalance persists in convalescence together with endothelial cell (EC) activation and angiogenic disturbance. Additionally, we postulate that ongoing immune cell dysfunction may be linked to sustained EC and coagulation activation.Fifty patients were reviewed at a minimum of 6 weeks following acute COVID-19. ADAMTS-13, Weibel Palade Body (WPB) proteins, and angiogenesis-related proteins were assessed and clinical evaluation and immunophenotyping performed. Comparisons were made with healthy controls (n = 20) and acute COVID-19 patients (n = 36).ADAMTS-13 levels were reduced (p = 0.009) and the VWF-ADAMTS-13 ratio was increased in convalescence (p = 0.0004). Levels of platelet factor 4 (PF4), a putative protector of VWF, were also elevated (p = 0.0001). A non-significant increase in WPB proteins Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and Osteoprotegerin (OPG) was observed in convalescent patients and WPB markers correlated with EC parameters. Enhanced expression of 21 angiogenesis-related proteins was observed in convalescent COVID-19. Finally, immunophenotyping revealed significantly elevated intermediate monocytes and activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in convalescence, which correlated with thrombin generation and endotheliopathy markers, respectively.Our data provide insights into sustained EC activation, dysregulated angiogenesis, and VWF/ADAMTS-13 axis imbalance in convalescent COVID-19. In keeping with the pivotal role of immunothrombosis in acute COVID-19, our findings support the hypothesis that abnormal T cell and monocyte populations may be important in the context of persistent EC activation and hemostatic dysfunction during convalescence.

Background The management of pregnant women with von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is complex as physiological pregnancy-induced increases in plasma von Willebrand Factor (VWF) may be blunted or absent. Women with VWD experience a heightened risk of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and special consideration must be given regarding neuraxial anaesthesia (NA) and the need for prophylaxis at time of delivery. These challenges are compounded by a lack of robust evidence to guide clinical decision making. Objectives & Methods To determine the current international clinical practises in the management of pregnancy for women with VWD, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) conducted an international survey of healthcare providers (HCP). Results 132 respondents from 39 countries were included in the final analysis. Variations in clinical practise were identified in antenatal (monitoring of plasma VWF and ferritin levels), peripartum (optimal plasma VWF target at delivery) and postpartum management (definitions used for PPH and postpartum monitoring). A key area of divergence was suitability for NA for women with type 2 and type 3 VWD, with many respondents advising against the use of NA even with VWF supplementation (29% type 2 VWD, 37% type 3 VWD) but others advising use once plasma VWF activity was was >50 IU/dL (57% type 2 VWD; 50% type 3 VWD). Conclusions This survey highlighted areas of uncertainty surrounding common management issues for pregnant women with VWD. These data underscore the need for international collaborative research efforts focused on peripartum management to improve care for pregnant women with VWD.

Background Persistent symptoms including breathlessness, fatigue, and decreased exercise tolerance have been reported in patients after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. The biological mechanisms underlying this “long COVID” syndrome remain unknown. However, autopsy studies have highlighted the key roles played by pulmonary endotheliopathy and microvascular immunothrombosis in acute COVID-19. Objectives To assess whether endothelial cell activation may be sustained in convalescent COVID-19 patients and contribute to long COVID pathogenesis. Patients and Methods Fifty patients were reviewed at a median of 68 days following SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition to clinical workup, acute phase markers, endothelial cell (EC) activation and NETosis parameters and thrombin generation were assessed. Results Thrombin generation assays revealed significantly shorter lag times (p < .0001, 95% CI −2.57 to −1.02 min), increased endogenous thrombin potential (p = .04, 95% CI 15–416 nM/min), and peak thrombin (p < .0001, 95% CI 39–93 nM) in convalescent COVID-19 patients. These prothrombotic changes were independent of ongoing acute phase response or active NETosis. Importantly, EC biomarkers including von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF propeptide (VWFpp), and factor VIII were significantly elevated in convalescent COVID-19 compared with controls (p = .004, 95% CI 0.09–0.57 IU/ml; p = .009, 95% CI 0.06–0.5 IU/ml; p = .04, 95% CI 0.03–0.44 IU/ml, respectively). In addition, plasma soluble thrombomodulin levels were significantly elevated in convalescent COVID-19 (p = .02, 95% CI 0.01–2.7 ng/ml). Sustained endotheliopathy was more frequent in older, comorbid patients, and those requiring hospitalization. Finally, both plasma VWF:Ag and VWFpp levels correlated inversely with 6-min walk tests. Conclusions Collectively, our findings demonstrate that sustained endotheliopathy is common in convalescent COVID-19 and raise the intriguing possibility that this may contribute to long COVID pathogenesis.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients have an increased bleeding risk with the introduction of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. BTK is a signaling effector downstream of the platelet GPVI receptor. Innate platelet dysfunction in CLL patients and the contribution of the leukemia microenvironment to the anti-platelet effect of BTK inhibitors are still not well defined. Herein, we investigated platelet function in stable, untreated CLL patients in comparison to age-matched healthy subjects as control. Secondly, we proposed a novel mechanism of platelet dysfunction via the adenosinergic pathway during BTK inhibitor therapy. Our data indicate that the nucleotidase that produces adenosine, CD73, was expressed on one-third of B-cells in CLL patients. Inhibition of CD73 improved platelet response to ADP in the blood of CLL patients ex vivo. Using healthy platelets, we show that adenosine 2A (A2A) receptor activation amplifies the anti-platelet effect of ibrutinib (10 nM). Ibrutinib plus an A2A agonist—but not ibrutinib as a single agent—significantly inhibited collagen (10 µg/mL)-induced platelet aggregation. Mechanistically, A2A activation attenuated collagen-mediated inhibition of p-VASP and synergized with ibrutinib to inhibit the phosphorylation of AKT, ERK and SYK kinases. This manuscript highlights the potential role of adenosine generated by the microenvironment in ibrutinib-associated bleeding in CLL patients.

Objectives To describe characteristics and compare clinical outcomes including falls, fractures, infections, and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) among long-term care residents with dementia with and without agitation. Methods A cross-sectional secondary analysis of administrative healthcare data was conducted whereby residents with dementia residing in a long-term care facility for ≥12 months were identified from the AnalytiCare LLC database (10/2010-06/2014) and were classified into mutually exclusive cohorts (Agitation Cohort or No-Agitation Cohort) based on available agitation-related symptoms. Entropy balancing was used to balance demographic and clinical characteristics between the two cohorts. The impact of agitation on clinical outcomes was compared between balanced cohorts using weighted logistic regression models. Results The study included 6,265 long-term care residents with dementia among whom, 3,313 were included in the Agitation Cohort and 2,952 in the No-Agitation Cohort. Prior to balancing, residents in the Agitation Cohort had greater dementia-related cognitive impairment and clinical manifestations compared to the No-Agitation Cohort. After balancing, residents with and without agitation, respectively, received a median of five and four distinct types of medications (including antipsychotics). Further, compared to residents without agitation, those with agitation were significantly more likely to have a recorded fall (OR = 1.58), fracture (OR = 1.29), infection (OR = 1.18), and other NPS (OR = 2.11). Conclusions Agitation in long-term care residents with dementia was associated with numerically higher medication use and an increased likelihood of experiencing falls, fractures, infections, and additional NPS compared to residents without agitation, highlighting the unmet need for effective management of agitation symptoms in this population.

Background Consistent with fulminant endothelial cell activation, elevated plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen levels have been reported in patients with COVID‐19. The multimeric size and function of VWF are normally regulated through A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease with ThrombSpondin Motif type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS‐13)‐‐mediated proteolysis. Objectives This study investigated the hypothesis that ADAMTS‐13 regulation of VWF multimer distribution may be impaired in severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection contributing to the observed microvascular thrombosis. Patients and Methods Patients with COVID‐19 (n = 23) were recruited from the Beaumont Hospital Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Dublin. Plasma VWF antigen, multimer distribution, ADAMTS‐13 activity, and known inhibitors thereof were assessed. Results We observed markedly increased VWF collagen‐binding activity in patients with severe COVID‐19 compared to controls (median 509.1 versus 94.3 IU/dl). Conversely, plasma ADAMTS‐13 activity was significantly reduced (median 68.2 IU/dl). In keeping with an increase in VWF:ADAMTS‐13 ratio, abnormalities in VWF multimer distribution were common in patients with COVID‐19, with reductions in high molecular weight VWF multimers. Terminal sialylation regulates VWF susceptibility to proteolysis by ADAMTS‐13 and other proteases. We observed that both N‐ and O‐linked sialylation were altered in severe COVID‐19. Furthermore, plasma levels of the ADAMTS‐13 inhibitors interleukin‐6, thrombospondin‐1, and platelet factor 4 were significantly elevated. Conclusions These findings support the hypothesis that SARS‐CoV‐2 is associated with profound quantitative and qualitative increases in plasma VWF levels, and a multifactorial down‐regulation in ADAMTS‐13 function. Further studies will be required to determine whether therapeutic interventions to correct ADAMTS‐13‐VWF multimer dysfunction may be useful in COVID‐microvascular thrombosis and angiopathy.

Background Circadian rhythm disturbances have been reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Among these is an increased phase angle between peak cortisol concentration and dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO). The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in chronobiologic parameters of sleep in patients with MDD receiving adjunctive brexpiprazole. Methods This was an interventional, multicenter, open-label, flexible-dose, exploratory study in patients with MDD and inadequate response to antidepressant treatment who were experiencing sleep disturbances. Patients received adjunctive brexpiprazole 2–3 mg/day for 8 weeks. Outcome measures included cortisol and melatonin levels, used to calculate phase angle, and the Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN). Results The mean (standard error) phase angle between peak cortisol and DLMO increased by 108 (61) minutes from baseline to Week 8 (n = 9). BRIAN Total score changed (improved) by –14.6 (4.6) points from baseline to Week 8 (n = 9). Change in phase angle and BRIAN Total score showed a moderate-to-high correlation (Pearson coefficient: 0.68; 95% confidence limits: 0.04, 0.93; p = 0.040). Limitations This study is limited by its small sample size, and its single-arm, open-label design. Conclusions The findings provide a preliminary indication that the phase angle between peak cortisol and DLMO is of interest as a potential biomarker for depression and therapeutic response. Adjunctive brexpiprazole may represent a strategy for correcting circadian dysfunction in patients with MDD and inadequate response to antidepressant treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01942733.

Background: Few studies have examined patient characteristics and treatment patterns among patients with dementia and agitation in the United States (US). Objective: To examine real-world treatment patterns and characteristics of patients with agitation related to dementia who were treated with antipsychotics in US residential care and community-based settings. Methods: This retrospective chart review collected US physician-level data from patients 55 to 90 years old initiated on an antipsychotic medication for the treatment of agitation related to dementia from January 2018 to May 2018. Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns were assessed overall and stratified by residential care and community-based settings. Results: A total of 313 participating physicians, 59.5% of whom were primary care physicians, abstracted 801 patient charts (residential care: n = 312; community-based: n = 489). Of patients with agitation who were initiated on an antipsychotic, most patients (74.5%) were initiated within 3 months of the onset of their studied agitation episode, and 62.8% experienced multiple agitation episodes before initiation. While non-pharmacological therapies are recommended first-line approach for agitation in dementia, use of non-pharmacological therapy before initiation of antipsychotics was reported for only 37.8% of patients in residential care and 21.3% in community-based settings. Conclusion: Most patients were initiated on an antipsychotic treatment after multiple episodes of agitation and largely without initial non-pharmacological therapy, suggesting that current treatment guideline recommendations for first-line non-pharmacological intervention may not be adequately followed in clinical practice. Understanding the clinical burden and treatment patterns among dementia patients with agitation is imperative for effective disease management.

Purpose Two phase 2 studies evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of centanafadine sustained-release (SR) for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Patients and Methods In a phase 2a, flexible-dose, single-blind study, 41 male patients (aged 18‒55 years) with a diagnosis of ADHD (based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) were titrated with centanafadine-SR 200‒300, 400, or 500 mg/d for 2 weeks, and then were treated with the titrated dose for 2 weeks. In a phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 85 male and female patients (aged 18‒60 years) with a diagnosis of ADHD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition) were titrated to target doses of centanafadine-SR 400, 500, 600, or 800 mg/d over the course of 1 week, and then received their titrated dose for 3 weeks. The primary outcome in both studies was mean total ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) score. Results In the phase 2a study, mean ADHD-RS-IV total score decreased by 21.41 (standard deviation 10.74) from the start of active centanafadine-SR treatment to the end of week 4 (P

Objective To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brexpiprazole in patients with agitation in Alzheimer's dementia (AAD). Design Two 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm studies (NCT01862640; NCT01922258). Setting Study 1: 81 sites in 7 countries. Study 2: 62 sites in 9 countries. Participants Patients with AAD (Study 1: 433 randomized; Study 2: 270 randomized) in a care facility or community-based setting. Stable Alzheimer disease medications were permitted. Intervention Study 1 (fixed dose): brexpiprazole 2 mg/day, brexpiprazole 1 mg/day, or placebo (1:1:1) for 12 weeks. Study 2 (flexible dose): brexpiprazole 0.5–2 mg/day or placebo (1:1) for 12 weeks. Measurements Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) (Total score range: 29–203; higher scores indicate more frequent agitated behaviors), and Clinical Global Impression – Severity of illness (CGI-S) as related to agitation. Safety was also assessed. Results In Study 1, brexpiprazole 2 mg/day demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvement in CMAI Total score from baseline to Week 12 than placebo (adjusted mean difference, −3.77; confidence limits, –7.38, –0.17; t(316) = –2.06; p = 0.040; MMRM). Brexpiprazole 1 mg/day did not show meaningful separation from placebo (0.23; −3.40, 3.86; t(314) = 0.12; p = 0.90; MMRM). In Study 2, brexpiprazole 0.5–2 mg/day did not achieve statistical superiority over placebo (–2.34; –5.49, 0.82; t(230) = −1.46; p = 0.15; MMRM). However, a benefit was observed in post hoc analyses among patients titrated to the maximum brexpiprazole dose of 2 mg/day compared with similarly titrated placebo patients (−5.06; −8.99, −1.13; t(144) = −2.54; p = 0.012; MMRM). On the CGI-S, a greater numerical improvement than placebo was demonstrated for brexpiprazole 2 mg/day in Study 1 (−0.16; −0.39, 0.06; t(337) = −1.42; nominal p = 0.16; MMRM), and a greater improvement for brexpiprazole 0.5–2 mg/day in Study 2 (−0.31; −0.55, −0.06; t(222) = −2.42; nominal p = 0.016; MMRM). In Study 1, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with incidence ≥5% among patients receiving brexpiprazole 2 mg/day were headache (9.3% versus 8.1% with placebo), insomnia (5.7% versus 4.4%), dizziness (5.7% versus 3.0%), and urinary tract infection (5.0% versus 1.5%). In Study 2, TEAEs with incidence ≥5% among patients receiving brexpiprazole 0.5–2 mg/day were headache (7.6% versus 12.4% with placebo) and somnolence (6.1% versus 3.6%). In both studies, the majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions Brexpiprazole 2 mg/day has the potential to be efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of AAD.

Background Investigation of hemostasis is problematic when patients are on anticoagulant therapy. Rivaroxaban especially causes substantial interference, extending many clot-based tests, thereby leading to false positive or negative events. In particular, rivaroxaban affects some assays for activated protein C resistance (APCR). Methods We assessed, in an international setting, cross laboratory (n = 31) testing using four samples to evaluate rivaroxaban induced interference in APCR testing, and whether this interference could be neutralised. The samples comprised: (A) pool of normal plasma (APCR-negative control); (B) this normal pool spiked with rivaroxaban (200 ng/mL) to create rivaroxaban-induced interference (potential ‘false’ positive APCR event sample); (C) the rivaroxaban sample subsequently treated with a commercial direct oral anticoagulant ‘DOAC-neutraliser’ (DOAC Stop), or (D) treated with andexanet alfa (200 μg/mL). Testing was performed blind to sample type. Results The rivaroxaban-spiked sample generated false positive APCR results for some, but unexpectedly not most APCR-tests. The sample treated with DOAC Stop evidenced a correction in the rivaroxaban-affected APCR assays, and did not otherwise adversely affect the rivaroxaban ‘unaffected’ APCR assays. The andexanet alfa-treated sample did not evidence correction of the false positive APCR, and instead unexpectedly exacerbated false positive APCR status with many tests. Conclusions DOAC Stop was able to neutralise any APCR interference induced by rivaroxaban. In contrast, andexanet alfa did not negate such interference, and instead unexpectedly created more false-positive APCR events.

Introduction Investigation of factors (F) VIII and IX is common, with testing important for diagnosis or exclusion of haemophilia A or B, associated acquired conditions and factor inhibitors. Rivaroxaban, a common direct anti‐Xa agent, causes significant interference in clotting assays, including substantial false reduction of factor levels. Aim To assess whether rivaroxaban‐induced interference of FVIII and FIX testing could be neutralized. Materials and methods An international, cross‐laboratory exercise for FVIII (n = 84) and FIX (n = 74), using four samples: (A) pool of normal plasma; (B) pool spiked with rivaroxaban (200 ng/mL); (C) rivaroxaban sample subsequently treated with ‘DOAC Stop’ and; (D) rivaroxaban sample treated with andexanet alfa (200 μg/mL). Testing performed blind to sample type. Results All laboratories reported normal FIX and 94% reported normal FVIII in the pool sample. Instead, 55% and 95%, respectively, reported abnormal FIX and FVIII levels for the rivaroxaban sample. DOAC Stop treatment evidenced a correction in most laboratories (100% reported normal FIX and 86% normal FVIII). Andexanet alfa provided intermediate results, with many laboratories still reporting abnormal results (59% for FVIII, 18% for FIX). We also identified reagent‐specific issues. Conclusions As expected, rivaroxaban caused false low values of FVIII and FIX. This might lead to increased testing to identify the cause of low factor levels and potentially lead to false identification of (mild) haemophilia A or B if unrecognized by clinicians/laboratories. DOAC Stop effectively neutralized the rivaroxaban effect, but andexanet alfa less so, with reagent‐related effects evident, and thus, false low values sometimes persisted.

Jessica Madera,1 Pedro Such,2 Peter Zhang,1 Ross A Baker,1 Iria Grande31Medical Affairs, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization Inc, Princeton, NJ, USA; 2Medical Affairs, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark; 3Bipolar and Depression Disorders Unit, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, SpainPurpose: There is growing agreement that definitions of “recovery” in bipolar-I disorder (BP-I) should include functional outcomes beyond sustained symptomatic remission. In this post-hoc analysis, we assessed functional recovery rates according to the validated Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in participants with BP-I after 52 weeks of maintenance treatment with aripiprazole once monthly (AOM).Patients and methods: Rates of functional recovery with AOM 400 were investigated in two 52-week studies. NCT01567527 was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized-withdrawal study and NCT01710709 was an open-label study. Functional recovery, assessed at the end of the respective maintenance phases, was defined as a total FAST score of ≤11 for 8 consecutive weeks.Results: Post-hoc analyses included 229 patients from the randomized-withdrawal study (AOM 400 n=116; placebo n=113). The open-label study included 402 patients (including 321 de novo patients and 81 rollover patients who had completed the randomized-withdrawal study). In the randomized-withdrawal study, functional recovery was achieved by 30.2% (n=35) of the AOM 400 group compared with 24.8% (n=28) in the placebo group. The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.39). In the open-label study, 36% (n=116) of de novo patients and 43% (n=35) of rollover patients had functionally recovered after 52 weeks of AOM 400 treatment.Conclusion: These data highlight the utility of a sustained FAST total score of ≤11 as a definition of recovery and emphasize the possibility of achieving this ambitious treatment goal with effective long-term treatment.Keywords: bipolar disorder, aripiprazole, long-acting injectable, maintenance, functioning, recovery

Introduction Lupus anticoagulant (LA) investigation in patients on anticoagulant therapy is problematic. Rivaroxaban in particular causes significant interference, prolonging both LA screening and confirmation tests, and falsely raising LA screen/confirm ratios, leading to potential false identification of LA. The Russell Viper Venom Time (RVVT) assay, key to the investigation of LA, is especially sensitive to rivaroxaban. Materials and methods We assessed cross laboratory (n = 82) testing of four samples to investigate whether rivaroxaban induced interference in LA testing could be neutralised. Testing was performed blind to sample type. The samples comprised: (A) A pool of normal plasma (LA-negative control); (B) sample A spiked with rivaroxaban (200 ng/mL) to create rivaroxaban-induced interference (LA ‘false’ positive sample); (C) sample B subsequently treated with a commercial ‘DOAC-neutraliser’ (DOAC Stop); (D) sample B treated with andexanet alfa (200 μg/mL). Results As expected, the rivaroxaban-spiked sample (B) caused prolongation of most LA-tests, and also generated a falsely prolonged RVVT screen/confirm ratio (median 1.37, compared to 0.97 for sample A). The sample (C) treated with DOAC Stop evidenced a correction in LA-test clotting times, as well as neutralising the false positive LA (median RVVT screen/confirm ratio of 0.99). Although the andexanet alfa treated sample (D) also yielded a low median RVVT screen/confirm ratio of 0.88, it did not fully correct LA-test clotting times. Consistent with test findings, all laboratories interpreted samples A and C as being LA-negative. For sample B (rivaroxaban), 45.3% identified this as LA positive, and 38.7% identified LA interference. Most (61.3%) also identified sample D as LA negative, with the remainder (38.7%) identifying LA interference. Conclusions DOAC Stop was able to neutralise the false LA activity induced by rivaroxaban, both in terms of clot-times and LA ratios. In contrast, whilst andexanet alfa negated the rivaroxaban-prolonged LA-ratio, it did not fully correct clot-times, leaving some residual LA interference, and requiring additional testing to investigate prolonged clotting times.

Whether early placement of an inferior vena cava filter reduces the risk of pulmonary embolism or death in severely injured patients who have a contraindication to prophylactic anticoagulation is not known.In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned 240 severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score15 [scores range from 0 to 75, with higher scores indicating more severe injury]) who had a contraindication to anticoagulant agents to have a vena cava filter placed within the first 72 hours after admission for the injury or to have no filter placed. The primary end point was a composite of symptomatic pulmonary embolism or death from any cause at 90 days after enrollment; a secondary end point was symptomatic pulmonary embolism between day 8 and day 90 in the subgroup of patients who survived at least 7 days and did not receive prophylactic anticoagulation within 7 days after injury. All patients underwent ultrasonography of the legs at 2 weeks; patients also underwent mandatory computed tomographic pulmonary angiography when prespecified criteria were met.The median age of the patients was 39 years, and the median Injury Severity Score was 27. Early placement of a vena cava filter did not result in a significantly lower incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism or death than no placement of a filter (13.9% in the vena cava filter group and 14.4% in the control group; hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 1.94; P = 0.98). Among the 46 patients in the vena cava filter group and the 34 patients in the control group who did not receive prophylactic anticoagulation within 7 days after injury, pulmonary embolism developed in none of those in the vena cava filter group and in 5 (14.7%) in the control group, including 1 patient who died (relative risk of pulmonary embolism, 0; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.55). An entrapped thrombus was found in the filter in 6 patients.Early prophylactic placement of a vena cava filter after major trauma did not result in a lower incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism or death at 90 days than no placement of a filter. (Funded by the Medical Research Foundation of Royal Perth Hospital and others; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12614000963628.).

Objective To evaluate the effect of aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400; Abilify Maintena®) on personal and social functioning in patients with schizophrenia in both the acute treatment and maintenance therapy settings. Methods Post hoc analyses were conducted on data from Study 291 (NCT01663532), a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in patients who were experiencing an acute psychotic episode, and Study 248 (NCT00731549), a 52-week open-label extension of two randomized, controlled trials of AOM 400 as maintenance therapy. Assessment of functioning was made using the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale. In Study 291, results were stratified by age (≤35 years or >35 years). Results In Study 291, 340 patients were included in the analysis (n=168 randomized to AOM 400 [n=49 aged ≤35 years, n=119 aged >35 years]; n=172 randomized to placebo [n=54 aged ≤35 years, n=118 aged >35 years]). In Study 248, 1,081 patients entered the open-label maintenance phase and 858 completed the study. In Study 291, AOM 400, compared with placebo, resulted in a significant increase (improvement) in PSP scores based on LSM (SE) changes from baseline to Week 12 in patients aged ≤35 years (20.6 [1.9] for AOM 400 vs 9.5 [2.4] for placebo; P=0.001) and a numerically (but not significantly) larger increase in PSP scores in patients aged >35 years (16.1 [1.7] for AOM 400 vs 12.5 [1.9] for placebo; P=0.093). Improvements in both age groups met criteria for a minimally important clinical difference (7-10 points). In Study 248, AOM 400 resulted in either numerical improvements (increases) from baseline in PSP total score or maintenance of stable baseline values throughout the study. Conclusion AOM 400 was effective in improving personal and social functioning during acute treatment and maintaining function during long-term treatment.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400; Abilify Maintena®) on symptom stability in acute treatment and maintenance therapy settings in patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Results were analyzed from two pivotal maintenance studies (Studies 246 and 247), a long-term (52 weeks), open-label extension of these studies (Study 248), an open-label, mirror-image study in patients switching from oral to long-acting injectable antipsychotic therapy (Study 283), and a study of AOM 400 in the acute setting (Study 291). Symptom stability was assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale (CGI-Severity of Illness and CGI-Improvement). Results are reported for the total study population and in subgroups stratified by age. Results: In Study 246, AOM 400 resulted in significantly greater improvements from baseline vs placebo on all measures of symptom stability, with improvements maintained through 52 weeks. In Study 247, a non-inferiority study, AOM 400 resulted in improvements in PANSS and CGI scores comparable or significantly greater at all timepoints vs oral aripiprazole. In Study 248, AOM 400 resulted in the long-term stability of symptom improvements from the earlier studies. In Study 283, AOM 400 resulted in significant improvements from baseline in PANSS and CGI scores over 24 weeks. In Study 291, AOM 400 resulted in significantly greater improvements from baseline in PANSS and CGI scores vs placebo at all post-baseline timepoints. In post hoc analyses, AOM 400 showed similar efficacy in symptom improvement in adult patients aged ≤35 years and >35 years, with some evidence of a larger treatment effect on PANSS negative symptoms among younger patients in the acute treatment setting. Conclusion: In acute treatment and maintenance therapy settings, AOM 400 was effective in the rapid stabilization and long-term maintenance of symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.

Objectives:More than 90% of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) experience behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), such as agitation. However, little is known regarding the specific burden of agitation for Alzheimer’s patients.Design:A global systematic literature review was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase for studies of clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of agitation in AD/dementia published from 2006–2016. References of identified papers and related literature reviews were examined. Studies meeting predetermined inclusion criteria for burden of agitation/NPS were summarized.Results:Eighty papers met the inclusion criteria for burden of agitation in dementia. Wide ranges of agitation prevalence were reported, but few papers provided information on incidence. The association of agitation with AD severity was presented in multiple studies; a few suggested positive association of agitation with mortality.Conclusions:High prevalence of agitation is consistent with earlier reports, but several gaps in understanding of agitation in AD need further exploration.

Recent studies have demonstrated that only 30% of patients referred for assessment of a possible bleeding tendency will eventually be diagnosed with a mild bleeding disorder (MBD) such as von Willebrand disease (VWD) or platelet function defect (PFD). Rather, the majority of such patients will be diagnosed with Bleeding Disorder of Unknown Cause (BDUC). There remains an important unmet need to define consensus regarding the clinical and laboratory criteria necessary for a formal BDUC diagnosis. Nevertheless, BDUC already accounts for more than 10% of patients registered in some Haemophilia Comprehensive Care centres. Accumulating recent data suggest that BDUC is also being diagnosed with increasing frequency. Increased BAT scores are widely utilized to differentiate significant from trivial symptoms in patients with mucocutaneous bleeding. Objective assessment of bleeding phenotype using a standardised bleeding assessment tool (BAT) therefore represents a fundamental first step in the diagnosis of BDUC. Since BDUC is a diagnosis by exclusion, accurate quantification of bleeding phenotype is critical as this will be the primary determinant upon which a diagnosis of BDUC is reached. Importantly, BAT scores suggest that patients with BDUC display bleeding phenotypes comparable to those seen in patients with VWD or PFD respectively. Despite the prevalence of BDUC, diagnosis and management of these patients commonly pose significant clinical dilemmas. In this manuscript, we consider these challenges in the context of a number of typical case studies, discuss the available evidence and outline our approach to the management of these patients.

TPS8075 Background: Standard of care for SMM includes active monitoring until progression to multiple myeloma (MM); however, recent evidence suggests pts with high-risk features may benefit from early treatment. DARA is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 that is approved as monotherapy for relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) or in combination with standard of care for RRMM or newly diagnosed MM. Results from the phase 3 COLUMBA study showed that DARA SC demonstrated similar efficacy to intravenous (IV) DARA but with a lower rate of infusion-related reactions and shorter administration time. Based on the promising single-agent activity observed with IV DARA in intermediate- or high-risk SMM pts during the phase 2 CENTAURUS study, we hypothesized that DARA SC may delay progression to MM versus active monitoring in pts with high-risk SMM. Methods: AQUILA is an ongoing, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 3 study of DARA SC versus active monitoring in pts with high-risk SMM. DARA SC (DARA 1,800 mg + recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 [rHuPH20; 2,000 U/mL; Halozyme]) is administered by manual injection over approximately 5 minutes at alternating locations on the abdomen weekly in Cycles 1 and 2, every 2 weeks in Cycles 3-6, and every 4 weeks thereafter until 39 cycles (28 days/cycle), up to 36 months, or until disease progression. Eligibility criteria include confirmed diagnosis of SMM for ≤5 years, factors indicating high risk of progression to MM (clonal bone marrow plasma cells [BMPCs] ≥10% and ≥1 of the following: serum M protein ≥30 g/L, IgA SMM, immunoparesis with reduction of 2 uninvolved Ig isotypes, serum involved:uninvolved free light chain ratio ≥8 to < 100, or clonal BMPCs > 50% to < 60% with measurable disease), and ECOG performance status ≤1. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review committee, with disease progression defined according to International Myeloma Working Group diagnostic criteria for MM. Secondary endpoints include time to biochemical or diagnostic (SLiM-CRAB) progression, overall response rate, complete response rate, duration of response, time to response, time to first-line treatment for MM, PFS on first-line treatment for MM (PFS2), overall survival, and incidence of MM with adverse prognostic features. The study completed enrollment on May 6, 2019; 390 pts have been randomly assigned to DARA SC or active monitoring. The primary efficacy analysis will be performed after approximately 165 PFS events have been observed. Clinical trial information: NCT03301220.

Background High estradiol (E2) levels are linked to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism; however, the underlying molecular mechanism(s) remain poorly understood. We previously identified an E2-responsive microRNA (miR), miR-494–3p, that downregulates protein S expression, and posited additional coagulation factors, such as tissue factor, may be regulated in a similar manner via miRs. Objectives To evaluate the coagulation capacity of cohorts with high physiological E2, and to further characterize novel E2-responsive miR and miR regulation on tissue factor in E2-related hypercoagulability. Methods Ceveron Alpha thrombin generation assay (TGA) was used to assess plasma coagulation profile of three cohorts. The effect of physiological levels of E2, 10 nM, on miR expression in HuH-7 cells was compared using NanoString nCounter and validated with independent assays. The effect of tissue factor-interacting miR was confirmed by dual-luciferase reporter assays, immunoblotting, flow cytometry, biochemistry assays, and TGA. Results Plasma samples from pregnant women and women on the contraceptive pill were confirmed to be hypercoagulable (compared with sex-matched controls). At equivalent and high physiological levels of E2, miR-365a-3p displayed concordant E2 downregulation in two independent miR quantification platforms, and tissue factor protein was upregulated by E2 treatment. Direct interaction between miR-365a-3p and F3-3′UTR was confirmed and overexpression of miR-365a-3p led to a decrease of (1) tissue factor mRNA transcripts, (2) protein levels, (3) activity, and (4) tissue factor-initiated thrombin generation. Conclusion miR-365a-3p is a novel tissue factor regulator. High E2 concentrations induce a hypercoagulable state via a miR network specific for coagulation factors.

Introduction: Renal impairment (RI) is a common feature in multiple myeloma (MM) and an adverse predictor of survival. Anti-myeloma treatments that can also improve renal function in patients (pts) with MM are required. Isatuximab (Isa), a monoclonal CD38 antibody, is approved in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (d), in the United States, the European Union, Canada, Australia, Switzerland, and Japan for the treatment of adult pts with relapsed/refractory MM who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. IKEMA (NCT03275285) was a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase 3 study that demonstrated the benefit of adding Isa to carfilzomib (K) plus d vs Kd in pts with relapsed MM. This subgroup analysis of IKEMA examined efficacy, renal response, and safety in pts with RI. Methods: Pts with 1-3 prior lines of therapy were randomized 3:2 and stratified by number of prior lines and revised international staging system (R-ISS) stage to receive Isa-Kd or Kd. The Isa-Kd arm received Isa 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly for 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks thereafter. Both arms received recommended doses of Kd. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events. Interim efficacy analysis was planned when 65% of the total expected progression-free survival (PFS) events determined by an Independent Response Committee were observed. RI was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate ([eGFR]; using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation) Results: A total of 302 pts (179 Isa-Kd; 123 Kd) were randomized. Pts with baseline eGFR as low as 15 mL/min/1.73m² (severe RI) were allowed to enroll. more pts with RI in the Isa-Kd arm (26.1%) vs Kd (16.2%). As expected, elderly pts had more RI. The median age in years (range) was 67 (39-86) for Isa-Kd vs 69 (49-90) for Kd among RI pts, and 64 (37-81) for Isa-Kd vs 62 (33-78) for Kd among pts with no RI. In RI pts, 60.5% vs 72.2% pts had ≥2 prior lines of therapy, 11.6% vs 16.7% had R-ISS stage III, and 20.9% vs 27.8% had high risk cytogenetics, in Isa-Kd vs Kd, respectively. More RI pts were still on treatment at the cut-off date in Isa-Kd (55.8%) vs Kd (16.7%). Median PFS for RI pts was not reached for Isa-Kd vs 13.4 months for Kd (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.11-0.66), and not reached for both study arms among pts with no RI (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.39-1.00). The overall response rate, ≥very good partial response rate, and minimal residual disease negativity for RI pts was higher with Isa-Kd than Kd: 93.0% vs 61.1%, 79.1% vs 44.4%, and 30.2% vs 11.1%, respectively. CrR accessed in pts with eGFR Conclusions: The addition of Isa to Kd improved PFS and disease response in pts with RI, with a manageable safety profile, consistent with the benefit observed in the overall IKEMA study population. Also, more pts treated with Isa-Kd showed reversal of RI and durable renal responses compared with Kd. Finally, RI pts treated with Isa-Kd received twice the number of cycles and had a lower treatment discontinuation rate compared with Kd pts. Disclosures Martin: AMGEN: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Moreau:Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Baker:Sanofi: Research Funding. Leleu:Karyopharm: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Oncopeptide: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Carsgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS-celgene: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria. Mohty:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Leblanc:Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene Canada; Janssen Inc.; Amgen Canada; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Risse:Sanofi: Current Employment. Malinge:AIXIAL: Consultancy. Schwab:Sanofi: Current Employment. Dimopoulos:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Introduction Agitation in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) may predict institutionalization. This study assessed the incremental risk and costs associated with agitation in individuals with AD. Methods A retrospective analysis of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (June 2005–February 2018) was conducted. Incremental risk of institutionalization associated with agitation was estimated and used with the number of institutionalized individuals with AD and agitation and costs of living by residential setting in the United States (literature-based), to estimate incremental institutionalization costs. Results The analysis included 11,348 individuals with AD: 6603 (58.2%) with and 4745 (41.8%) without agitation. Compared with individuals without agitation, those with agitation were 20% more likely to be institutionalized (odds ratio = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.08–1.33). Total incremental cost of institutionalization associated with agitation was $4.3 billion ($50,588/individual). Discussion Agitation is associated with a higher risk of institutionalization among patients with AD, which translates into a substantial economic burden., Highlights • Agitation in Alzheimer's disease portends higher risk of institutionalization. • Higher institutionalization risk translates into a substantial economic burden. • Agitation-related institutionalization cost was ∼$4.3 billion in the United States.

Importance Atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) are often used off-label to manage dementia-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms. In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a boxed warning for the use of AAPs in elderly patients. The long-term association of this warning with health outcomes is unknown to date. Objective To assess the long-term association of the 2005 FDA boxed warning on AAPs with psychiatric medication and opioid use, health events, and quality of life among elderly individuals with dementia. Design, Setting, and Participants For this cross-sectional study, data were analyzed from the household component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) fielded between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2014. This interrupted time-series analysis applied to 3-year moving means derived from the 1996-2014 MEPS, NAMCS, and NHAMCS. All survey respondents included in this analysis were 65 years or older and had dementia. Data analysis was performed from December 1, 2017, to March 15, 2018. Exposures The 2005 FDA boxed warning on AAPs. Main Outcomes and Measures Use of psychiatric medications and opioids, prevalence of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events, prevalence of falls and/or fractures, 2-year mortality, and health-related quality of life assessed by the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores. Results A total of 2430 (MEPS) and 5490 (NAMCS and NHAMCS) respondents were identified, corresponding to weighted populations of 22 996 526 (MEPS) and 65 502 344 (NAMCS and NHAMCS) noninstitutionalized elderly individuals with dementia (mean [SD] age, 81.06 [1.13] years; 63.1% female). In the MEPS sample, compared with before 2005, AAP use (from an annual slope of 0.99 to −0.18 percentage points), cerebrovascular events (0.75 to −0.50 percentage points), and falls and/or fractures (−1.72 to −0.40 percentage points) decreased and opioid use (0.04 to 1.29 percentage points), antiepileptic use (−0.42 to 1.21 percentage points), cardiovascular events (−0.13 to 1.30 percentage points), and 2-year mortality risk (−0.68 to 0.18 percentage points) increased. Health-related quality of life remained relatively unchanged. The NAMCS and NHAMCS sample yielded similar findings. Conclusions and Relevance These data suggest that the 2005 FDA boxed warning was associated with some unintended negative patient outcomes.

Essentials FcγRIIa mediates life-threatening heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Most anti-platelet factor (PF)4-heparin IgGs are not pathogenic so diagnosis of HIT is challenging. Dimeric rsFcγRIIa was used to quantify receptor-binding activity of anti-PF4-heparin antibodies. Dimeric rsFcγRIIa binding specifically correlated with occurrence of HIT. SUMMARY: Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a major and potentially fatal consequence of antibodies produced against platelet factor 4 (PF4)-heparin complexes following heparin exposure. Not all anti-PF4-heparin antibodies are pathogenic, so overdiagnosis can occur, with resulting inappropriate use of alternative anticoagulation therapies that have associated risks of bleeding. However, definitive platelet functional assays are not widely available for routine analysis. Objectives To assess the utility of dimeric recombinant soluble FcγRIIa (rsFcγRIIa) ectodomains for detecting HIT antibodies. Patients/Methods Plasma from 27 suspected HIT patients were tested for pathogenic anti-PF4-heparin antibodies by binding of a novel dimeric FcγRIIa ectodomain probe. Plasmas were also tested by the use of PF4-heparin IgG ELISA, the HemosIL AcuStar HIT IgG-specific assay, and a serotonin release assay (SRA). Results The dimeric rsFcγRIIa test produced no false positives and excluded four samples that were positive by IgG ELISA. In this small patient cohort, the novel assay correctly assigned 93% of the suspected HIT patients, with two of the HIT patients being scored as false negatives. The improved discrimination of the novel assay over the IgG ELISA, which scored four false positives, supports the mechanistic interpretation that binding of dimeric rsFcγRIIa detects pairs of closely spaced IgG antibodies in PF4-heparin immune complexes. Conclusions This study found the cell-free, function-based dimeric rsFcγRIIa assay to be convenient, simple, and potentially predictive of HIT. The assay had improved specificity over the IgG ELISA, and correlated strongly with the AcuStar HIT IgG-specific assay, warranting further evaluation of its potential to identify HIT in larger patient cohorts.

ObjectiveTo compare the tolerability and efficacy of different antipsychotic cross-titration schedules, using data from a brexpiprazole study (Equator; NCT01668797).MethodsPatients with schizophrenia were cross-titrated from other antipsychotics to brexpiprazole monotherapy in a 1–4 week open-label conversion phase, then entered a single-blind brexpiprazole treatment phase. Patients were stratified into four “conversion groups,” according to the amount of time spent in the conversion phase. Discontinuation rates, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and efficacy (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS]) were compared between conversion groups.ResultsOf the 404 patients treated with brexpiprazole, the majority (72.0%) spent 22–33 days in the conversion phase. Discontinuation rates due to lack of efficacy or adverse events were low in all conversion groups. Of the 292 patients who successfully switched and completed 8 weeks of brexpiprazole treatment, most were converted to brexpiprazole over 22–33 days (80.1%), and fewer were converted over 1–7 days (2.4%), 8–14 days (6.5%), or 15–21 days (11.0%). The incidence of TEAEs over 8 weeks was lower among those converted over 22–33 days (44.4%) than in other conversion groups (62.5–84.2%), although low patient numbers with shorter conversion times limit the generalizability of this finding. Each conversion group showed comparable improvement in PANSS total score from baseline.ConclusionThe majority of patients were cross-titrated to brexpiprazole over a period of 22–33 days, by investigators’ choice. Additional data on shorter conversions may help clinicians to choose a switching paradigm that best meets their patients’ needs.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., The aim of this analysis was to explore the effects of brexpiprazole and aripiprazole on body weight when used as monotherapy to treat schizophrenia and as adjunctive treatment to antidepressant treatment (ADT) for major depressive disorder (MDD) in short-term (4/6 weeks) and long-term (≤52 weeks) studies. Body weight data were obtained from the clinical studies of each drug (brexpiprazole and aripiprazole), in schizophrenia and adjunctive treatment of MDD. Data were pooled and analyzed to assess the mean change in body weight and to determine the incidence of a clinically relevant change in body weight from baseline (≥7% increase or decrease, at any time) in each treatment group. The overall weight profiles for brexpiprazole and aripiprazole in the short-term and long-term treatment of schizophrenia, and MDD (adjunctive to ADT), were similar. In short-term schizophrenia studies, the mean weight increase was 1.2 kg for brexpiprazole and 0.6 kg for aripiprazole. In short-term MDD studies (adjunctive to ADT), the mean weight increase was 1.5 kg for brexpiprazole and 1.6 kg for aripiprazole. In the long-term schizophrenia studies, at week 52, the mean weight increase was 2.1 kg for brexpiprazole and 3.0 kg for aripiprazole. In long-term MDD studies (adjunctive to ADT), at week 52, the mean weight increase was 3.2 kg for brexpiprazole and 4.0 kg for aripiprazole. Clinically relevant increases or decreases in body weight were also similar for brexpiprazole and aripiprazole. Overall, in the treatment of schizophrenia, and in adjunctive treatment of MDD, brexpiprazole and aripiprazole have a similar effect on body weight over the course of 1 year.

Introduction: Key characteristics of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) include immune-mediated platelet destruction/impaired production, with resultant thrombocytopenia and increased bleeding risk. Durable response to current therapies remains an unmet need, particularly in the relapsed/refractory setting. Rilzabrutinib is the first oral, reversible, covalent inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase designed to target immune-mediated pathways in ITP without inhibiting normal platelet aggregation. Initial phase I/II results in ITP demonstrated rapid and durable efficacy with rilzabrutinib that was well-tolerated at all dose levels, including the optimal 400 mg bid dose. Interim results on rilzabrutinib effects in patients with relapsed/refractory ITP were previously reported. Here we present long-term data from a larger group of patients who initiated rilzabrutinib at 400 mg bid and are continuing in the long-term extension (LTE) period. Methods: This ongoing, global phase I/II study (NCT03395210) enrolled adult patients from 8 countries with relapsed or refractory ITP who previously responded to ≥1 prior ITP therapy. Eligible patients with 2 baseline platelet counts of Results: As of June 1, 2021 in 60 patients, 45 patients initiated rilzabrutinib 400 mg bid and to date, 16 patients with durable, stable response proceeded to LTE at 400 mg bid. At enrollment for patients initiating rilzabrutinib 400 mg bid, median age was 49 y (range, 19-74), median duration of ITP was 6.1 y (range, 0.4-52.5), and median platelet count was 15×10 9/L (range, 2-33×10 9/L). Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 6 prior treatment events (range, 1-53), including 24% with prior splenectomy. Overall, 18/45 patients (40%) achieved the primary endpoint. In primary responders, platelet counts of ≥30×10 9/L, ≥30×10 9/L with ≥20×10 9/L above baseline, and ≥50×10 9/L were maintained for a median of 95%, 86%, and 72% of weeks, respectively. Median time to first platelet counts of ≥30×10 9/L, ≥30×10 9/L with ≥20×10 9/L above baseline, and ≥50×10 9/L were 8.5 (7-134), 11.5 (7-134), and 12.5 (8-142) days, respectively. According to subgroup analyses, primary platelet responses were consistently >30% irrespective of baseline platelet counts, the use of concomitant therapy, duration of ITP, or number of prior therapies (Table). LTE patients received rilzabrutinib for an overall median duration of 462 days (range, 303-764). At LTE entry, patients had a median platelet count of 87×10 9/L (range, 16-321×10 9/L). In addition to all LTE patients achieving the primary endpoint during the main treatment period, these patients maintained platelet counts of ≥30×10 9/L, ≥30×10 9/L with ≥20×10 9/L above baseline, and ≥50×10 9/L, for a median of 100%, 96%, and 90%, of weeks, respectively, during the LTE period (Figure). Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; all grade 1/2) were reported in 27/45 patients (60%); the most common were 36% diarrhea and 31% nausea, and all others were Conclusion: Oral rilzabrutinib 400 mg bid was well-tolerated and had durable, clinically significant platelet responses across subgroups and with extended treatment in patients with heavily pretreated ITP. Continued study in the ongoing, randomized phase III LUNA3 trial (NCT04562766) will further assess the magnitude and durability of rilzabrutinib's clinical benefit in ITP. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kuter: Actelion (Syntimmune), Agios, Alnylam, Amgen, Argenx, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Immunovant, Kezar, Principia, Protalex, Rigel, Takeda (Bioverativ), UCB: Research Funding; Up-to-Date: Patents & Royalties: Up-To-Date; Rubius: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Actelion (Syntimmune), Agios, Alnylam, Amgen, Argenx, BioCryst, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Caremark, CRICO, Daiichi Sankyo, Dova, Genzyme, Immunovant, Incyte, Kyowa-Kirin, Merck Sharp Dohme, Momenta, Novartis, Pfizer, Principia, Protalex, Protalix, Rigel: Consultancy, Other: grant support and consulting fees; Platelet Disorder Support Association: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mayer: Principia: Research Funding. Jansen: 3SBIO, Novartis: Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses; Advisory Board Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. McDonald: Bayer, Sobi, Novartis, Amgen, argenx: Honoraria; Grifols: Research Funding. Baker: Roche, Janssen-Celeg: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer, Takeda, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, CSL Behring, Roche, Amgen, Celgene, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, Sanofi, MorphoSys AG, Acerta Pharma, Jansen-Cileg, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Portola, Technoclone, Alexion: Research Funding. Bird: Novartis, Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Garg: Amgen Janssen Novartis Sanofi Takeda: Honoraria; Takeda Janssen Novartis Sanofi: Other: Travel Accommodations, Expenses; University Hospital Leicester: Current Employment. Gernsheimer: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: personal fees ; Amgen: Honoraria; Cellphire: Consultancy; Dova: Consultancy, Honoraria; Principia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; NHLBI: Research Funding. Ghanima: Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer, Principia Biopharma Inc- a Sanofi Company, Sanofi, SOBI, Griffols, UCB, Argenx: Consultancy; Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, SOBI, Griffols, Sanofi: Honoraria; Bayer, BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding. Bandman: Sanofi: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Arora: Principia Biopharma Inc, a Sanofi Company: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Burns: Sanofi: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Yao: Sanofi: Current Employment. Daak: Sanofi: Current Employment. Sourdille: Sanofi: Current Employment. Thomas: Chinook and Equillium Biopharma: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Chinook: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Equillium Biopharma: Current Employment; Principia, a Sanofi Company: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Equillium Biopharma: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Neale: Principia Biopharma/Sanofi: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Principia Biopharma: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Cooper: Sanofi and Principia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations expenses; Principia and Sanofi: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Rilzabrutinib is an investigational therapy being evaluated in a clinical study for the treatment of patients with immune thrombocytopenia.

Alex Kopelowicz,1 Ross A Baker,2 Cathy Zhao,2 Claudette Brewer,3 Erica Lawson,3 Timothy Peters-Strickland2 1David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 2Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization Inc., Princeton, NJ, 3Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization Inc., Rockville, MD, USA Background: Medication nonadherence is common in the treatment of serious mental illness (SMI) and leads to poor outcomes. The digital medicine system (DMS) objectively measures adherence with oral aripiprazole in near-real time, allowing recognition of adherence issues. This pilot study evaluated the functionality of an integrated call center in optimizing the use of the DMS. Materials and methods: An 8-week, open-label, single-arm trial at four US sites enrolled adults with bipolar I disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia on stable oral aripiprazole doses and willing to use the DMS (oral aripiprazole + ingestible event marker [IEM], IEM-detecting skin patch, and software application). Integrated call-center functionality was assessed based on numbers and types of calls. Ingestion adherence with prescribed treatment (aripiprazole + IEM) during good patch wear and proportion of time with good patch wear (days with ≥80% patch data or detected IEM) were also assessed. Results: All enrolled patients (n=49) used the DMS and were included in analyses; disease duration overall approached 10 years. For a duration of 8 weeks, 136 calls were made by patients, and a comparable 160 calls were made to patients, demonstrating interactive communication. The mean (SD) number of calls made by patients was 2.8 (3.5). Approximately half of the inbound calls made by patients occurred during the first 2 weeks and were software application- or patch-related. Mean ingestion adherence was 88.6%, and corresponding good patch wear occurred on 80.1% of study days. Conclusion: In this pilot study, the integrated call center facilitated DMS implementation in patients with SMI on stable doses of oral aripiprazole. In clinical practice, the call center and the DMS will facilitate objective measurement of adherence and potentially improve rates of adherence in patients with SMI. Keywords: schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, major depressive disorder, digital medicine, adherence&nbsp

Background As the capabilities and reach of technology have expanded, there is an accompanying proliferation of digital technologies developed for use in the care of patients with mental illness. The objective of this review was to systematically search published literature to identify currently available health technologies and their intended uses for patients with serious mental illness. Materials and methods The Medline, Embase, and BIOSIS Previews electronic databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed English language articles that reported the use of digital, mobile, and other advanced technology in patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Eligible studies were systematically reviewed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results Eighteen studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified. Digital health technologies (DHTs) assessed in the selected studies included mobile applications (apps), digital medicine, digital personal health records, and an electronic pill container. Smartphone apps accounted for the largest share of DHTs. The intended uses of DHTs could be broadly classified as monitoring to gain a better understanding of illness, clinical assessment, and intervention. Overall, studies indicated high usability/feasibility and efficacy/effectiveness, with several reporting validity against established clinical scales. Users were generally engaged with the DHT, and mobile assessments were deemed helpful in monitoring disease symptoms. Conclusion Rapidly proliferating digital technologies seem to be feasible for short-term use in patients with serious mental illness; nevertheless, long-term effectiveness data from naturalistic studies will help demonstrate their usefulness and facilitate their adoption and integration into the mental health-care system.

Background Accumulating evidence indicate that circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are useful independent non-invasive biomarkers, with unique miRNA signatures defined for various pathophysiological conditions. However, there are no established universal housekeeping miRNAs for the normalisation of miRNAs in body fluids. We have previously identified an oestrogen-responsive miRNA, miR-494, in regulating the anticoagulant, Protein S, in HuH-7 liver cells. Moreover, increased thrombotic risk associated with elevated circulating oestrogen levels is frequently observed in pregnant women and oral contraceptive users. In order to identify other oestrogen-responsive miRNAs, including miR-494, that may be indicative of increased thrombotic risk in plasma, we used nanoString analysis to identify robust and stable endogenous reference miRNAs for the study of oestrogen-responsive miRNAs in plasma. Results We compared the plasma miRNA expression profile of individuals with: (1) Low circulating oestrogens (healthy men and non-pregnant women not taking oral contraceptives), (2) High circulating synthetic oestrogens, (women taking oral contraceptives) and (3) High circulating natural oestrogens (pregnant females >14 weeks gestation). From the nanoString analyses, 11 candidate reference miRNAs which exhibited high counts and not significantly differentially expressed between groups were selected for validation using realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and digital droplet PCR (DDPCR) in pooled plasma samples, and the stability of their expression evaluated using NormFinder and BestKeeper algorithms. Four miRNAs (miR-25-5p, miR-188-5p, miR-222-3p and miR-520f) demonstrated detectable stable expression between groups and were further analysed by RT-qPCR in individual plasma samples, where miR-188-5p and miR-222-3p expression were identified as a stable pair of reference genes. The miRNA reference panel consisting of synthetic spike-ins cel-miR-39 and ath-miR159a, and reference miRNAs, miR-188-5p and miR-222-3p was useful in evaluating fold-change of the pregnancy-associated miRNA, miR-141-3p, between groups. Conclusion The miRNA reference panel will be useful for normalising qPCR data comparing miRNA expression between men and women, non-pregnant and pregnant females, and the potential effects of endogenous and synthetic oestrogens on plasma miRNA expression. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-017-2636-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background Long-acting injectable antipsychotics are treatment options for acute and long-term treatment of patients with schizophrenia. In a previously published 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of patients with schizophrenia experiencing an acute psychotic episode, aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400) produced significantly greater improvement than placebo on the primary endpoint, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at week 10. Methods To examine the efficacy of AOM 400 across a broader representation of schizophrenia symptoms, including agitation, a post hoc analysis of this trial was carried out to assess the change in PANSS Marder factor domains (positive symptoms, negative symptoms, disorganized thought, uncontrolled hostility/excitement, and anxiety/depression) and the PANSS excited component (equivalent to Marder factor domain uncontrolled hostility/excitement plus the tension item) by comparing differences in change from baseline between AOM 400 and placebo using a mixed model for repeated measures. Results The differences between treatment and placebo for all factors were statistically significant, with improvements seen as early as week 1 or 2, and maintained through week 12. Thus, AOM 400, supplemented with oral aripiprazole in the first 2 weeks, showed significantly greater efficacy versus placebo in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia in all 5 Marder illness domains, as well as in agitation as conceptualized by the PANSS excited component score. Conclusions These findings indicate that AOM 400 is efficacious across the spectrum of schizophrenia symptoms in acutely ill patients, with implications for both short-term and, by extension, long-term patient outcomes.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Sexual dysfunction, a common side effect of antipsychotic medications, may be partly caused by dopamine antagonism and elevation of prolactin. In QUALIFY, a randomized study, aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400), a dopamine D2 receptor partial agonist, showed noninferiority and subsequent superiority versus paliperidone palmitate (PP), a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, on the Heinrichs–Carpenter Quality-of-Life Scale (QLS) in patients with schizophrenia aged 18–60 years. Sexual dysfunction (Arizona Sexual Experience Scale) and serum prolactin levels were also assessed. Odds for sexual dysfunction were lower with AOM 400 versus PP [week 28 adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval), 0.29 (0.14–0.61); P=0.0012] in men [0.33 (0.13–0.86); P=0.023], women [0.14 (0.03–0.62); P=0.0099], and patients aged 18–35 years [0.04 (

Introduction:Long-term maintenance treatment is essential in management of bipolar I disorder (BP-I) to achieve mood stability, prevent recurrence of mood episodes and improve functioning. Aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400) is a long-acting formulation of aripiprazole for maintenance treatment of BP-I. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal study in adult patients with BP-I after a manic episode (NCT01567527), AOM 400 delayed time to and reduced rate of recurrence of mood episodes and was safe and well tolerated (1). In an open-label, long-term safety study (NCT01710709), AOM 400 was safe and effective as long-term maintenance treatment (2).Objective:To evaluate the effect of long-term AOM 400 maintenance treatment on manic and depressive symptoms in BP-I patients from the open-label, long term safety study.Methods:Manic and depressive symptoms were assessed post-hoc by analysis of change from study entry in the Young-Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores and line item scores. The mean changes from baseline at last visit in YMRS and MADRS total scores, and single items were calculated using descriptive statistics, using last observation carried forward for total scores and observed cases for single items.Results:A total of 464 patients entered the maintenance phase: 379 were de novo and 85 were rollover patients who completed the double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study. Overall, 63% (291/464) completed 52 weeks of open-label treatment. Mean YMRS and MADRS total scores were minimally changed from baseline (YMRS: 2.31, endpoint change -0.30; MADRS: 3.23, endpoint change +1.24) across the study in the total population.Conclusion:Patients entering an open-label safety study with stable manic and depressive symptoms maintained stability in both types of symptoms, as shown by minimal mean changes from baseline in YMRS and MADRS scores, suggesting that treatment with AOM 400 is effective in preventing re-emergence of both manic and depressive symptoms.Funding Acknowledgements:The study was supported by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

Background In schizophrenia, a patient’s quality of life and level of psychosocial functioning is dependent on two key domains: the severity of their psychotic symptoms, and the side effects of antipsychotic medication. In addition, people with schizophrenia experience motivation deficits, thus patient engagement is a key component of successful schizophrenia treatment outcomes. The present analyses investigated the effect of brexpiprazole (a serotonin–dopamine activity modulator that is a partial agonist at 5-HT1A and dopamine D2 receptors, and an antagonist at 5-HT2A and noradrenaline alpha1B/2C receptors, all at similar potency) on patient engagement. The concept of patient engagement stems from the collective post-marketing experience with brexpiprazole, and has been established in patients with MDD and an inadequate response to antidepressant treatments treated with adjunctive brexpiprazole. To explore the concept of engagement in schizophrenia, 11 out of the 30 items in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were identified as relevant to capture patient improvement and well-being beyond an improvement of the core symptoms of schizophrenia. Methods The studies [Vector (NCT01396421), Beacon (NCT01393613) and Lighthouse (NCT01810380)] included patients aged 18–65 years experiencing an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR criteria), and who would benefit from hospitalization or continued hospitalization. Eligible patients were randomized to 6 weeks treatment with placebo or brexpiprazole ranging from doses of 0.25 to 4 mg/day depending on the study. The primary efficacy analysis in all three studies was the mean change in PANSS Total score from baseline (randomization) to Week 6. The PANSS was administered at weekly intervals. Items N1, N2, N3, N4, N5, N6, G6, G7, G13, G15, and G16 were selected from the PANSS as relevant items to capture patient engagement. In the present analysis, data were pooled for patients allocated to placebo and to a brexpiprazole dose in the range of 2–4 mg. Mean changes from baseline on the selected PANSS items were analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures approach. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to validate whether changes in the selected items clustered together. Standardized effect sizes were also calculated. Results In the short-term studies, the PANSS scale was completed at baseline by a total of 1,378 patients, brexpiprazole 2–4 mg (n=863); placebo (n=515). At Week 6, an improvement (p The PCA showed that the majority of the selected items cluster together, confirming the importance of the selected items for patient engagement/re-engagement with their lives. The standardized effect size for brexpiprazole versus placebo was -0.31 for the combined 11 selected items and of a similar magnitude as the effect size of the PANSS Total score (-0.32). Discussion 11 items from the PANSS scale were selected to capture patient re-engagement. The clustering, as shown by the PCA, validated the selection of the specific engagement items. The results of these exploratory post-hoc analyses suggest that treatment with brexpiprazole, in addition to improving symptoms of schizophrenia, has the potential to also improve patient well-being and engagement with life.

This guidance document was prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH), by the ADAMTS13 Assay Working Group, which comprises an international group of both clinical and laboratory experts. The document provides recommendations on best practice for the performance of ADAMTS13 assays in clinical laboratories. ADAMTS13 assays support the differential diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathies and have utility in the management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). There are three types of assay: activity, antigen and autoantibody/inhibitor assays. Methods for activity assays differ in terms of sensitivity, specificity, precision and turnaround time. The most widely used assays involve VWF peptide substrates and either chromogenic ELISA or FRET techniques, although chemiluminescence assays and rapid screening tests have recently become available. Tests for autoantibodies and inhibitors allow confirmation of acquired, immune-mediated TTP, while antigen assays may be useful in congenital TTP and as prognostic markers. In this document, we have attempted to describe ADAMTS13 assays and the conditions that affect them, as well as: blood collection, sample processing, quality control, standardization and clinical utility; recognizing that laboratories in different parts of the world have varying levels of sophistication. The recommendations are based on expert opinion, published literature and good clinical laboratory practice.

J. Brooks Flippen, an historian at Southeastern Oklahoma State University, has avoided one of the most serious pitfalls to face biographers: he has not fallen head-over-heels in love with his subje...