Search

Academic departments regularly offer dual-listed courses in which one course has two course numbers, yet are taught in the same place, at the same time, by a single instructor, and in one department to undergraduate and graduate students. While universities discourage their use by subjecting such courses to more rigorous approval processes, academic departments often offer these courses to solve logistic and resource concerns. Little empirical research has examined students' perceptions of dual listed courses. This pilot study presents quantitative and qualitative findings (n = 781) of a survey sent to students enrolled at a Midwestern, land-grant University. The findings reveal that students perceive many benefits of dual-listed courses. Undergraduate students benefitted from exposure to graduate school expectations through interaction with graduate students. Graduate students benefitted from refreshing their knowledge of basic material and learning how to structure undergraduate courses for their future academic careers. Recommendations for improving dual-listed courses are provided.

This paper takes aim at one specific, as well as basic, need in teamwork and interdisciplinary projects--ethics and its implications for professional practice. A preliminary study suggests that students majoring in industrial technology degree programs may not have adequate opportunity to formally study and engage in ethical aspects of technology vis-a-vis the practices of the profession. It is reasonable to assume that the ethical dilemmas faced by an industrial technologist would parallel those of engineers and managers. To address this issue, this paper identifies a domain of knowledge that would constitute a necessary background in ethics for industrial technologists, examines various resources for teaching, and makes recommendations from a pedagogical point of view. (Contains 6 tables.)

Insects can cause damage to stored grain, especially on smallholder farms in the tropics. Sitophilus zeamais (maize weevil, MW) and Rhyzopertha dominica (lesser grain borer, LGB) are often involved. Our objective was to determine, by four experiments, if physical disturbance of grain can control these pests. In Experiment 1, 2.6-L unsealed recycled coffee cans were each loaded with 1 kg of maize and 25 live adult MW/kg. Every 12 h, disturbed treatment cans were manually rolled through one circumference. After 160 d, live MW numbers had been reduced by 93% compared to undisturbed cans. In Experiment 2, MW-infested maize was placed in 20-L plastic cans and stored by farmers in Tanzania. Each farmer had three cans. Two were disturbed by shaking morning and evening and the third was left undisturbed. After 90 d, MW populations had increased in the undisturbed containers, but had decreased to zero in every disturbed container. In Experiments 3 (and 4), maize (wheat) infested with 25 adult MW/kg (LGB/kg) was placed in six boxes. Three of the boxes were disturbed every 12 h by use of Sukup motor-driven grain stirrers; the other three were undisturbed. After 120 days, MW numbers in undisturbed boxes had increased, but were zero in stirred boxes. In Experiment 4, 80-d samples showed increased numbers of LGB in undisturbed boxes but reductions of over 98% in stirred boxes. Quality of disturbed grain was similar or better than that of undisturbed grain. This work suggests that grain disturbance may be an effective non-chemical, non-hermetic physical approach for control of stored grain insects.