Search

The vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) is a short-latency potential evoked through activation of vestibular receptors using sound or vibration. It is generated by modulated electromyographic signals either from the sternocleidomastoid muscle for the cervical VEMP (cVEMP) or the inferior oblique muscle for the ocular VEMP (oVEMP). These reflexes appear to originate from the otolith organs and thus complement existing methods of vestibular assessment, which are mainly based upon canal function. This review considers the basis, methodology, and current applications of the cVEMP and oVEMP in the assessment and diagnosis of vestibular disorders, both peripheral and central., (© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) is sensitive to lower brainstem lesions affecting the vestibulo-collic pathway. We wished to determine whether the ocular VEMP (oVEMP), a recently-described otolith-ocular reflex, is also abnormal in patients with brainstem lesions. We tested patients with internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO), caused by a brainstem lesion in the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF), to investigate whether the oVEMP is abnormal in patients with a lesion of the otolith-ocular pathway., Methods: We describe a patient who developed a right INO during his first episode of demyelination, and report results from 12 additional patients, most of whom had multiple sclerosis. All subjects were stimulated with air-conducted tone bursts. cVEMPs and oVEMPs were measured using surface electrodes placed over the neck and beneath the eyes., Results: Overall, oVEMPs showed significantly more abnormalities (69%) than cVEMPs (8%). Ocular VEMPs were absent with stimulation of 13/26 ears, significantly delayed in 5/26 cases and normal in only 8/26 cases., Conclusion: Ocular VEMPs are often abnormal in patients with multiple sclerosis who have an INO, while cVEMPs are usually normal., Significance: Ocular VEMPs provide a new, non-invasive method for examining central vestibular pathways in humans and are sensitive to lesions of the MLF., (Copyright © 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Since the first description of sound-evoked short-latency myogenic reflexes recorded from neck muscles, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) have become an important part of the neuro-otological test battery. VEMPs provide a means of assessing otolith function: stimulation of the vestibular system with air-conducted sound activates predominantly saccular afferents, while bone-conducted vibration activates a combination of saccular and utricular afferents. The conventional method for recording the VEMP involves measuring electromyographic (EMG) activity from surface electrodes placed over the tonically-activated sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles. The "cervical VEMP" (cVEMP) is thus a manifestation of the vestibulo-collic reflex. However, recent research has shown that VEMPs can also be recorded from the extraocular muscles using surface electrodes placed near the eyes. These "ocular VEMPs" (oVEMPs) are a manifestation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex. Here we describe the historical development and neurophysiological properties of the cVEMP and oVEMP and provide recommendations for recording both reflexes. While the cVEMP has documented diagnostic utility in many disorders affecting vestibular function, relatively little is known as yet about the clinical value of the oVEMP. We therefore outline the known cVEMP and oVEMP characteristics in common central and peripheral disorders encountered in neuro-otology clinics., (Copyright 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Patients with superior canal dehiscence (SCD) typically have enhanced sound-evoked vestibular reflexes, such as vestibulo-collic and vestibulo-ocular reflexes. We wished to investigate whether sound-evoked lower limb EMG responses and postural sway are also enhanced in this condition., Methods: Eight patients with CT confirmed SCD (11 affected ears) and 8 age-matched normal controls participated. Three sound-evoked responses were measured; vestibulo-collic reflexes (i.e. vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, VEMPs), lower limb vestibulo-spinal reflexes and body sway (centre of pressure in mm). Sound stimuli were 500 Hz air-conducted tone bursts of varying lengths (VEMPs: 2 ms; vestibulo-spinal: 20 ms; sway: 1s and 200 ms) set at fixed levels above each subject's VEMP threshold., Results: SCD patients had very large VEMP and vestibulo-spinal responses following high intensity stimulation, but at the matched intensity of 15 dB above threshold amplitudes were similar in both SCD patients and controls. The amplitude of both responses increased linearly with increasing stimulus intensity in both groups. Large ( approximately 20mm), stereotyped sway responses were present in only one (atypical) patient with high intensity stimulation. Small ( approximately 2mm) sway responses were present in the remaining patients, and began immediately following the vestibulo-spinal responses., Conclusions: Despite the presence of large vestibular reflexes, there is usually very little body sway in response to loud sounds in SCD patients., Significance: Large short-latency vestibulo-spinal reflexes in SCD do not necessarily evoke large sway responses.

Objective: To investigate the origin, whether ocular or extraocular, of the short latency frontal potential (N15) reported by following vestibular stimulation., Methods: Fourteen subjects with low VEMP thresholds (V(T)) and 9 patients with vestibular or ocular disorders were stimulated at the mastoid with bone-conducted tone bursts (500 Hz, 8 ms) above vestibular threshold, using a B71 bone vibrator. Surface potentials were recorded from Fpz and around the eyes and referred to linked earlobes., Results: The N15 was present at Fpz, but was largest around the eyes (mean amplitude 2.6 microV, peak latency 13.4 ms, with stimulation at +18 dB above threshold) and was generally in phase above and below the eyes. The response was vestibular-dependent and modulated by alteration of gaze direction. The potentials were delayed in a patient with Miller Fisher syndrome and were larger in patients with superior canal dehiscence than in controls., Conclusions: We report a new vestibular-evoked extraocular potential. Its properties are not consistent with an eye movement. It is likely to be produced, mainly or exclusively, by synchronous activity in extraocular muscles (i.e. a myogenic potential)., Significance: Vestibular-evoked extraocular potentials extend the range of vestibular pathways that can be assessed electrophysiologically, and may be a useful additional test of vestibular function.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of varying current rise time on galvanic-evoked short (SL) and medium (ML) latency vestibulospinal reflexes., Methods: We recorded the soleus EMG of standing subjects in response to 3 mA direct current transmastoid stimulation with a series of current ramps with rise times of 0-300 ms., Results: Longer current rise times significantly delayed the onset of both SL (P<<0.001) and ML (P<<0.001) vestibulospinal responses, by approximately 20 and 39 ms, respectively. The SL response amplitude was reduced with increasing rise time (P<<0.001), whereas the ML response amplitude was relatively unaffected by stimulus rise time. With very slow rise times a prolonged ML response alone was evoked., Conclusions: Both SL and ML reflexes can be evoked by changes in vestibular activity produced by transmastoid galvanic stimulation with a ramp onset. We found a differential effect of current rise time on SL and ML vestibulospinal reflexes, suggesting different potential functional roles for the two reflexes. SL reflexes can participate in the response to abrupt disturbances only. ML reflexes are evoked by both fast and slow changes in vestibular discharge and may be particularly effective for slowly-changing disturbances.