Search

PirePred is a genetic interpretation tool used for a variety of medical conditions investigated in newborn screening programs. The PirePred server retrieves, analyzes, and displays in real time genetic and structural data on 58 genes/proteins associated with medical conditions frequently investigated in the newborn. PirePred analyzes the predictions generated by 15 pathogenicity predictors and applies an optimized majority vote algorithm to classify any possible nonsynonymous single-nucleotide variant as pathogenic, benign, or of uncertain significance. PirePred predictions for variants of clear clinical significance are better than those of any of the individual predictors considered (based on accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value) or are among the best ones (for positive predictive value and Matthews correlation coefficient). PirePred predictions also outperform the comparable in silico predictions offered as supporting evidence, according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, by VarSome and Franklin. Also, PirePred has very high prediction coverage. To facilitate the molecular interpretation of the missense, nonsense, and frameshift variants in ClinVar, the changing amino acid residue is displayed in its structural context, which is analyzed to provide functional clues. PirePred is an accurate, robust, and easy-to-use tool for clinicians involved in neonatal screening programs and for researchers of related diseases. The server is freely accessible and provides a user-friendly gateway into the structural/functional consequences of genetic variants at the protein level.

We present the results for CAPRI Round 50, the fourth joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of twelve targets, including six dimers, three trimers, and three higher-order oligomers. Four of these were easy targets, for which good structural templates were available either for the full assembly, or for the main interfaces (of the higher-order oligomers). Eight were difficult targets for which only distantly related templates were found for the individual subunits. Twenty-five CAPRI groups including eight automatic servers submitted ~1250 models per target. Twenty groups including six servers participated in the CAPRI scoring challenge submitted ~190 models per target. The accuracy of the predicted models was evaluated using the classical CAPRI criteria. The prediction performance was measured by a weighted scoring scheme that takes into account the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group as part of their five top-ranking models. Compared to the previous CASP-CAPRI challenge, top performing groups submitted such models for a larger fraction (70–75%) of the targets in this Round, but fewer of these models were of high accuracy. Scorer groups achieved stronger performance with more groups submitting correct models for 70–80% of the targets or achieving high accuracy predictions. Servers performed less well in general, except for the MDOCKPP and LZERD servers, who performed on par with human groups. In addition to these results, major advances in methodology are discussed, providing an informative overview of where the prediction of protein assemblies currently stands.

We present the results for CAPRI Round 50, the fourth joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of twelve targets, including six dimers, three trimers, and three higher-order oligomers. Four of these were easy targets, for which good structural templates were available either for the full assembly, or for the main interfaces (of the higher-order oligomers). Eight were difficult targets for which only distantly related templates were found for the individual subunits. Twenty-five CAPRI groups including eight automatic servers submitted ~1250 models per target. Twenty groups including six servers participated in the CAPRI scoring challenge submitted ~190 models per target. The accuracy of the predicted models was evaluated using the classical CAPRI criteria. The prediction performance was measured by a weighted scoring scheme that takes into account the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group as part of their five top-ranking models. Compared to the previous CASP-CAPRI challenge, top performing groups submitted such models for a larger fraction (70–75%) of the targets in this Round, but fewer of these models were of high accuracy. Scorer groups achieved stronger performance with more groups submitting correct models for 70–80% of the targets or achieving high accuracy predictions. Servers performed less well in general, except for the MDOCKPP and LZERD servers, who performed on par with human groups. In addition to these results, major advances in methodology are discussed, providing an informative overview of where the prediction of protein assemblies currently stands.

Protein-protein interactions play an essential role in many biological processes, and their perturbation is a major cause of disease. The use of small molecules to modulate them is attracting increased attention, but protein interfaces generally do not have clear cavities for binding small compounds. A proposed strategy is to target interface hot-spot residues, but their identification through computational approaches usually require the complex structure, which is not often available. In this context, pyDock energy-based docking and scoring can predict hot-spots on the unbound proteins, thus not requiring the complex structure. Here, we have devised a new strategy to detect protein–protein inhibitor binding sites, based on the integration of molecular dynamics for the generation of transient cavities, and docking-based interface hot-spot prediction for the selection of the suitable cavities. This integrative approach has been validated on a test set formed by protein–protein complexes with known inhibitors for which complete structural data of unbound molecules and complexes is available. The results show that local conformational sampling with short molecular dynamics can generate transient cavities similar to the known inhibitor binding sites, and that docking simulations can identify the best cavities with similar predictive accuracy as when knowing the real interface. In a few cases, these predicted pockets are shown to be suitable for protein–ligand docking. The proposed strategy will be useful for many protein–protein complexes for which there is no available structure, as long as the the unbound proteins do not deviate dramatically from the bound conformations., This research was funded by the EU European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Program Interreg V-A Spain-France-Andorra POCTEFA (grant PIREPRED), and by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (grant PID2019-110167RB-I00). M.R. is recipient of an FPI fellowship from the Severo Ochoa program., Peer Reviewed, Postprint (published version)

The study of the 3D structural details of protein interactions is essential to understand biomolecular functions at the molecular level. In this context, the limited availability of experimental structures of protein–protein complexes at atomic resolution is propelling the development of computational docking methods that aim to complement the current structural coverage of protein interactions. One of these docking approaches is pyDock, which uses van der Waals, electrostatics, and desolvation energy to score docking poses generated by a variety of sampling methods, typically FTDock or ZDOCK. The method has shown a consistently good prediction performance in community-wide assessment experiments like CAPRI or CASP, and has provided biological insights and insightful interpretation of experiments by modeling many biomolecular interactions of biomedical and biotechnological interest. Here, we describe in detail how to perform structural modeling of protein assemblies with pyDock, and the application of its modules to different biomolecular recognition phenomena, such as modeling of binding mode, interface, and hot-spot prediction, use of restraints based on experimental data, inclusion of low-resolution structural data, binding affinity estimation, or modeling of homo- and hetero-oligomeric assemblies., This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science (grant BIO2016-79930-R)., Peer Reviewed, Postprint (author's final draft)

The seventh CAPRI edition imposed new challenges to the modeling of protein-protein complexes, such as multimeric oligomerization, protein-peptide, and protein-oligosaccharide interactions. Many of the proposed targets needed the efficient integration of rigid-body docking, template-based modeling, flexible optimization, multiparametric scoring, and experimental restraints. This was especially relevant for the multimolecular assemblies proposed in the CASP12-CAPRI37 and CASP13-CAPRI46 joint rounds, which were described and evaluated elsewhere. Focusing on the purely CAPRI targets of this edition (rounds 38-45), we have participated in all 17 assessed targets (considering heteromeric and homomeric interfaces in T125 as two separate targets) both as predictors and as scorers, by using integrative modeling based on our docking and scoring approaches: pyDock, IRaPPA, and LightDock. In the protein-protein and protein-peptide targets, we have also participated with our webserver (pyDockWeb). On these 17 CAPRI targets, we submitted acceptable models (or better) within our top 10 models for 10 targets as predictors, 13 targets as scorers, and 4 targets as servers. In summary, our participation in this CAPRI edition confirmed the capabilities of pyDock for the scoring of docking models, increasingly used within the context of integrative modeling of protein interactions and multimeric assemblies.

The study of the 3D structural details of protein interactions is essential to understand biomolecular functions at the molecular level. In this context, the limited availability of experimental structures of protein-protein complexes at atomic resolution is propelling the development of computational docking methods that aim to complement the current structural coverage of protein interactions. One of these docking approaches is pyDock, which uses van der Waals, electrostatics, and desolvation energy to score docking poses generated by a variety of sampling methods, typically FTDock or ZDOCK. The method has shown a consistently good prediction performance in community-wide assessment experiments like CAPRI or CASP, and has provided biological insights and insightful interpretation of experiments by modeling many biomolecular interactions of biomedical and biotechnological interest. Here, we describe our approach using pyDock for the structural modeling of protein assemblies and the application of its modules to different biomolecular recognition phenomena, such as modeling of binding mode, interface, and hot-spot prediction, use of restraints based on experimental data, the inclusion of lowresolution structural data, binding affinity estimation, or modeling of homo- and heterooligomeric assemblies. The integration of template-based and ab initio docking approaches is emerging as the optimal strategy for modeling protein complexes and multi-molecular assemblies. We will review the new methodological advances on ab initio docking and integrative modeling. The seventh CAPRI edition imposed new challenges to the modeling of protein-protein complexes, such as multimeric oligomerization, protein-peptide, and proteinoligosaccharide interactions. Many of the proposed targets needed the efficient integration of rigid-body docking, template-based modeling, flexible optimization, multi-parametric scoring, and experimental restraints. This was especially relevant for the multi

The study of the 3D structural details of protein interactions is essential to understand biomolecular functions at the molecular level. In this context, the limited availability of experimental structures of protein–protein complexes at atomic resolution is propelling the development of computational docking methods that aim to complement the current structural coverage of protein interactions. One of these docking approaches is pyDock, which uses van der Waals, electrostatics, and desolvation energy to score docking poses generated by a variety of sampling methods, typically FTDock or ZDOCK. The method has shown a consistently good prediction performance in community-wide assessment experiments like CAPRI or CASP, and has provided biological insights and insightful interpretation of experiments by modeling many biomolecular interactions of biomedical and biotechnological interest. Here, we describe in detail how to perform structural modeling of protein assemblies with pyDock, and the application of its modules to different biomolecular recognition phenomena, such as modeling of binding mode, interface, and hot-spot prediction, use of restraints based on experimental data, inclusion of low-resolution structural data, binding affinity estimation, or modeling of homo- and hetero-oligomeric assemblies.

Protein-protein interactions play an essential role in many biological processes, and their perturbation is a major cause of disease. The use of small molecules to modulate them is attracting increased attention, but protein interfaces generally do not have clear cavities for binding small compounds. A proposed strategy is to target interface hot-spot residues, but their identification through computational approaches usually require the complex structure, which is not often available. In this context, pyDock energy-based docking and scoring can predict hot-spots on the unbound proteins, thus not requiring the complex structure. Here, we have devised a new strategy to detect protein–protein inhibitor binding sites, based on the integration of molecular dynamics for the generation of transient cavities, and docking-based interface hot-spot prediction for the selection of the suitable cavities. This integrative approach has been validated on a test set formed by protein–protein complexes with known inhibitors for which complete structural data of unbound molecules and complexes is available. The results show that local conformational sampling with short molecular dynamics can generate transient cavities similar to the known inhibitor binding sites, and that docking simulations can identify the best cavities with similar predictive accuracy as when knowing the real interface. In a few cases, these predicted pockets are shown to be suitable for protein–ligand docking. The proposed strategy will be useful for many protein–protein complexes for which there is no available structure, as long as the the unbound proteins do not deviate dramatically from the bound conformations.

Computational docking approaches aim to overcome the limited availability of experimental structural data on protein–protein interactions, which are key in biology. The field is rapidly moving from the traditional docking methodologies for modeling of binary complexes to more integrative approaches using template-based, data-driven modeling of multi-molecular assemblies. We will review here the predictive capabilities of current docking methods in blind conditions, based on the results from the most recent community-wide blind experiments. Integration of template-based and ab initio docking approaches is emerging as the optimal strategy for modeling protein complexes and multimolecular assemblies. We will also review the new methodological advances on ab initio docking and integrative modeling.

We present the results for CAPRI Round 46, the third joint CASP‐CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of 20 targets including 14 homo‐oligomers and 6 heterocomplexes. Eight of the homo‐oligomer targets and one heterodimer comprised proteins that could be readily modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank, often available for the full assembly. The remaining 11 targets comprised 5 homodimers, 3 heterodimers, and two higher‐order assemblies. These were more difficult to model, as their prediction mainly involved “ab‐initio” docking of subunit models derived from distantly related templates. A total of ~30 CAPRI groups, including 9 automatic servers, submitted on average ~2000 models per target. About 17 groups participated in the CAPRI scoring rounds, offered for most targets, submitting ~170 models per target. The prediction performance, measured by the fraction of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted across all predictors groups, was very good to excellent for the nine easy targets. Poorer performance was achieved by predictors for the 11 difficult targets, with medium and high quality models submitted for only 3 of these targets. A similar performance “gap” was displayed by scorer groups, highlighting yet again the unmet challenge of modeling the conformational changes of the protein components that occur upon binding or that must be accounted for in template‐based modeling. Our analysis also indicates that residues in binding interfaces were less well predicted in this set of targets than in previous Rounds, providing useful insights for directions of future improvements.

One of the known potential effects of disease-causing amino acid substitutions in proteins is to modulate protein-protein interactions (PPIs). To interpret such variants at the molecular level and to obtain useful information for prediction purposes, it is important to determine whether they are located at protein-protein interfaces, which are composed of two main regions, core and rim, with different evolutionary conservation and physicochemical properties. Here we have performed a structural, energetics and computational analysis of interactions between proteins hosting mutations related to diseases detected in newborn screening. Interface residues were classified as core or rim, showing that the core residues contribute the most to the binding free energy of the PPI. Disease-causing variants are more likely to occur at the interface core region rather than at the interface rim (p < 0.0001). In contrast, neutral variants are more often found at the interface rim or at the non-interacting surface rather than at the interface core region. We also found that arginine, tryptophan, and tyrosine are over-represented among mutated residues leading to disease. These results can enhance our understanding of disease at molecular level and thus contribute towards personalized medicine by helping clinicians to provide adequate diagnosis and treatments.

Introduction: Protein-protein interactions are important for biological processes and pathological situations, and are attractive targets for drug discovery. However, rational drug design targeting protein-protein interactions is still highly challenging. Hot-spot residues are seen as the best option to target such interactions, but their identification requires detailed structural and energetic characterization, which is only available for a tiny fraction of protein interactions. Areas covered: In this review, the authors cover a variety of computational methods that have been reported for the energetic analysis of protein-protein interfaces in search of hot-spots, and the structural modeling of protein-protein complexes by docking. This can help to rationalize the discovery of small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interfaces of therapeutic interest. Computational analysis and docking can help to locate the interface, molecular dynamics can be used to find suitable cavities, and hot-spot predictions can focus the search for inhibitors of protein-protein interactions. Expert opinion: A major difficulty for applying rational drug design methods to protein-protein interactions is that in the majority of cases the complex structure is not available. Fortunately, computational docking can complement experimental data. An interesting aspect to explore in the future is the integration of these strategies for targeting PPIs with large-scale mutational analysis., This work has been funded by grants BIO2016-79930-R and SEV-2015-0493 from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, and grant EFA086/15 from EU Interreg V POCTEFA. M Rosell is supported by an FPI fellowship from the Severo Ochoa program. The authors are grateful for the support of the the Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Programme in Computational Biology., Peer Reviewed, Postprint (author's final draft)

A huge amount of genetic information is available thanks to the recent advances in sequencing technologies and the larger computational capabilities, but the interpretation of such genetic data at phenotypic level remains elusive. One of the reasons is that proteins are not acting alone, but are specifically interacting with other proteins and biomolecules, forming intricate interaction networks that are essential for the majority of cell processes and pathological conditions. Thus, characterizing such interaction networks is an important step in understanding how information flows from gene to phenotype. Indeed, structural characterization of protein–protein interactions at atomic resolution has many applications in biomedicine, from diagnosis and vaccine design, to drug discovery. However, despite the advances of experimental structural determination, the number of interactions for which there is available structural data is still very small. In this context, a complementary approach is computational modeling of protein interactions by docking, which is usually composed of two major phases: (i) sampling of the possible binding modes between the interacting molecules and (ii) scoring for the identification of the correct orientations. In addition, prediction of interface and hot-spot residues is very useful in order to guide and interpret mutagenesis experiments, as well as to understand functional and mechanistic aspects of the interaction. Computational docking is already being applied to specific biomedical problems within the context of personalized medicine, for instance, helping to interpret pathological mutations involved in protein–protein interactions, or providing modeled structural data for drug discovery targeting protein–protein interactions.

[Introduction] Protein-protein interactions are important for biological processes and pathological situations, and are attractive targets for drug discovery. However, rational drug design targeting protein-protein interactions is still highly challenging. Hot-spot residues are seen as the best option to target such interactions, but their identification requires detailed structural and energetic characterization, which is only available for a tiny fraction of protein interactions., [Areas covered] In this review, the authors cover a variety of computational methods that have been reported for the energetic analysis of protein-protein interfaces in search of hot-spots, and the structural modeling of protein-protein complexes by docking. This can help to rationalize the discovery of small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interfaces of therapeutic interest. Computational analysis and docking can help to locate the interface, molecular dynamics can be used to find suitable cavities, and hot-spot predictions can focus the search for inhibitors of protein-protein interactions., [Expert opinion] A major difficulty for applying rational drug design methods to protein-protein interactions is that in the majority of cases the complex structure is not available. Fortunately, computational docking can complement experimental data. An interesting aspect to explore in the future is the integration of these strategies for targeting PPIs with large-scale mutational analysis

A huge amount of genetic information is available thanks to the recent advances in sequencing technologies and the larger computational capabilities, but the interpretation of such genetic data at phenotypic level remains elusive. One of the reasons is that proteins are not acting alone, but are specifically interacting with other proteins and biomolecules, forming intricate interaction networks that are essential for the majority of cell processes and pathological conditions. Thus, characterizing such interaction networks is an important step in understanding how information flows from gene to phenotype. Indeed, structural characterization of protein–protein interactions at atomic resolution has many applications in biomedicine, from diagnosis and vaccine design, to drug discovery. However, despite the advances of experimental structural determination, the number of interactions for which there is available structural data is still very small. In this context, a complementary approach is computational modeling of protein interactions by docking, which is usually composed of two major phases: (i) sampling of the possible binding modes between the interacting molecules and (ii) scoring for the identification of the correct orientations. In addition, prediction of interface and hot-spot residues is very useful in order to guide and interpret mutagenesis experiments, as well as to understand functional and mechanistic aspects of the interaction. Computational docking is already being applied to specific biomedical problems within the context of personalized medicine, for instance, helping to interpret pathological mutations involved in protein–protein interactions, or providing modeled structural data for drug discovery targeting protein–protein interactions., Spanish Ministry of Economy grant number BIO2016-79960-R; D.B.B. is supported by a predoctoral fellowship from CONACyT; M.R. is supported by an FPI fellowship from the Severo Ochoa program. We are grateful to the Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Programme in Computational Biology., Peer Reviewed, Postprint (author's final draft)

Apertium is a free/open-source platform for rule-based machine translation. It is being widely used to build machine translation systems for a variety of language pairs, especially in those cases (mainly with related-language pairs) where shallow transfer suffices to produce good quality translations, although it has also proven useful in assimilation scenarios with more distant pairs involved. This article summarises the Apertium platform: the translation engine, the encoding of linguistic data, and the tools developed around the platform. The present limitations of the platform and the challenges posed for the coming years are also discussed. Finally, evaluation results for some of the most active language pairs are presented. An appendix describes Apertium as a free/open-source project.