Search

Klebsiella pneumoniae are a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections worldwide. In particular, strains expressing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases pose serious treatment challenges, leading the World Health Organization (WHO) to designate ESBL and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae as 'critical' threats to human health. Research efforts to combat these pathogens can be supported by accessibility to diverse and clinically relevant isolates for testing novel therapeutics. Here, we describe a panel of 100 diverse K. pneumoniae isolates that are publicly available to assist the research community in this endeavour. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on 3878 K . pneumoniae clinical isolates housed at the Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network. The isolates were cultured from 63 facilities in 19 countries between 2001 and 2020. Core-genome multilocus sequence typing and high-resolution single-nucleotide polymorphism-based phylogenetic analyses captured the genetic diversity of the collection and were used to select the final panel of 100 isolates. In addition to known multidrug-resistant (MDR) pandemic lineages, the final panel includes hypervirulent lineages and isolates with specific and diverse resistance genes and virulence biomarkers. A broad range of antibiotic susceptibilities, ranging from pan-sensitive to extensively drug-resistant isolates, are described. The panel collection, and all associated metadata and genome sequences, are available at no additional cost and will be an important resource for the research community and for the design and development of novel antimicrobial agents and diagnostics against this important pathogen.

Background: Extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) are a leading cause of bloodstream and urinary tract infections worldwide. Over the last two decades, increased rates of antibiotic resistance in E. coli have been reported, further complicating treatment. Worryingly, specific lineages expressing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and fluoroquinolone resistance have proliferated and are now considered a serious threat. Obtaining contemporary information on the epidemiology and prevalence of these circulating lineages is critical for containing their spread globally and within the clinic., Methods: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS), phylogenetic analysis, and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed for a complete set of 2075 E. coli clinical isolates collected from 1776 patients at a large tertiary healthcare network in the USA between October 2019 and September 2020., Results: The isolates represented two main phylogenetic groups, B2 and D, with six lineages accounting for 53% of strains: ST-69, ST-73, ST-95, ST-131, ST-127, and ST-1193. Twenty-seven percent of the primary isolates were multidrug resistant (MDR) and 5% carried an ESBL gene. Importantly, 74% of the ESBL-E.coli were co-resistant to fluoroquinolones and mostly belonged to pandemic ST-131 and emerging ST-1193. SNP-based detection of possible outbreaks identified 95 potential transmission clusters totaling 258 isolates (12% of the whole population) from ≥ 2 patients. While the proportion of MDR isolates was enriched in the set of putative transmission isolates compared to sporadic infections (35 vs 27%, p = 0.007), a large fraction (61%) of the predicted outbreaks (including the largest cluster grouping isolates from 12 patients) were caused by the transmission of non-MDR clones., Conclusion: By coupling in-depth genomic characterization with a complete sampling of clinical isolates for a full year, this study provides a rare and contemporary survey on the epidemiology and spread of E. coli in a large US healthcare network. While surveillance and infection control efforts often focus on ESBL and MDR lineages, our findings reveal that non-MDR isolates represent a large burden of infections, including those of predicted nosocomial origins. This increased awareness is key for implementing effective WGS-based surveillance as a routine technology for infection control., (© 2022. The Author(s).)