Search

5595 Background: The majority of studies of uterine cancer combine high and low-grade histologies and do not sample a diverse cohort of patients. In many studies race is treated as biologic construct, when it may be better thought of as a proxy for socioeconomic inequity and deprivation. Socioeconomic (SE) deprivation may play a significant role in the disease trajectory of women with uterine cancer. Methods: Data were drawn from the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System which covers a tri-county area of approximately 4 million people. We included non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and White (NHW) women diagnosed with uterine cancer between 2010 and 2018. Poorly differentiated and undifferentiated endometrioid, serous, clear cell, mixed, carcinosarcoma and mucinous histologies were considered high grade. Patients diagnosed by death certificate, or with unknown stage or histology were excluded. Socioeconomic status was assessed using the Yost Score, an area-level composite measure of socioeconomic deprivation derived from census-tract data at cancer diagnosis. Lower Yost quintile indicates higher deprivation. Competing risk analysis was used to determine risk of uterine cancer specific mortality (reported as subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]) and to assess statistical interaction between race and Yost score. Results: A total of 4,840 patients were identified. Race conferred significant increased risk of cancer-specific mortality (SHR 2.11, p < 0.0001). Race and Yost score interacted to increase risk of cancer-specific mortality in NHB women in the lowest Yost quintile (SHR 2.23, p < 0.0001) compared to NHW and NHB women in the highest quintiles. The interaction between race and Yost score persisted only among women with low grade cancers (SHR 1.7, p = 0.04). Time from diagnosis to surgery increased as Yost score decreased. Women in the lowest Yost quintile had lower likelihood of receiving surgery within 6 weeks of diagnosis (OR 0.74, p = 0.001). This effect persisted among women with low grade cancer (NHB OR 0.75, p = 0.014; lowest Yost quintile OR 0.68, p < 0.0001). An association between race, Yost score and delays in time to surgery was not seen among women with high grade cancers. Conclusions: Race and Yost score, an area-based measure of socioeconomic deprivation, are associated with increased cancer-specific mortality risk among women with low grade cancer. NHB race and high socioeconomic deprivation are associated with delayed primary surgery. The interaction between race and socioeconomic deprivation may underlie known disparities in uterine cancer survival, particularly in low grade disease where there is the greatest opportunity for timely curative surgery.

In her essay “What is authority” Hannah Arendt wonders whether “What was authority?” would have been the more appropriate title. This paper aims to show that authority is indeed a contemporary phenomenon and one that is taking on ever greater significance. Arendt’s work on authority is used to support conclusions that she herself did not draw. These can be useful for the understanding of authority within today’s political and civil realms. With respect to the political system of representative democracies, the paper challenges Arendt’s claim that authority has vanished from contemporary societies and points to two new figures of authority, namely the expert and the populist. It diagnoses the comeback of the old antagonism between a metaphysical and a democratic justification of authority.

This study explores the relationship between small, differentiated reading groups and fourth-grade students' reading motivation. Using self-study methodology, the author examined her own process of implementing these reading groups through two cycles of action research. Data were analyzed from two different administrations of the Motivations for Reading Questionnaire, as well as from the author's narrative journal entries, written student reflections, small-group and individual interviews, and a critical friend's observations. Findings indicated that small, differentiated reading groups that emphasized social interaction and student choice led to a class culture of reading and promoted students' reading motivation. Students linked their learning in these groups to their written assignments and tended to devalue the group discussions. In addition, implementing the reading groups minimized the author's own performance gap and contributed to greater satisfaction in her own practice. These findings have impli...

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To determine the prophylactic and therapeutic value of a single subthreshold 810-nanometer laser treatment in patients with high risk drusen as a manifestation of dry age-related macular degeneration in both eyes. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Prophylactic Treatment of Age-related Macular Degeneration study enrolled 1,278 eyes of 639 participants who were 50 years or older with at least 5 drusen 63 µm or more in diameter in each eye. Treatment consisted of the placement of an annular grid of 48 extrafoveal, subthreshold 810-nm diode laser applications centered at but sparing the foveola in one eye of each participant, with the fellow eye serving as a control. Development of choroidal neovascularization and change in best-corrected visual acuity were compared between treated and untreated eyes. RESULTS Subthreshold laser treatment did not decrease the incidence of choroidal neovascularization in treated versus untreated eyes. A modest visual acuity benefit in treated eyes was found at 24 months (1.5 letter difference; P = .04) and in the treated eyes of participants with a baseline visual acuity between 20/32 and 20/63 (4.0 letter difference; P = .0034). However, this treatment effect was not sustained at 3 years. CONCLUSION A single subthreshold 810-nanometer laser treatment to eyes of participants with bilateral high risk drusen is not an effective prophylactic strategy against choroidal neovascularization. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2009;40:530-538.] AUTHORS From the UPMC Eye Center (TRF, PMB), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; the Shiley Eye Center (WRF), University of California–San Diego, La Jolla, California; and the W. K. Kellogg Eye Center (DCM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Accepted for publication December 19, 2008. Supported by Iridex Corporation, Mountain View, California, and the sources listed under the individual center descriptions found at the end of the article; the Eye and Ear Foundation of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York; and unrestricted funds from several participating centers. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, October 15-18, 2005, Chicago, Illinois, and the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, April 30-May 4, 2006, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. The authors thank photographic readers Cheryl Hiner, Columbia, MD, Rosemary J. Brothers, Madison, WI, and Linda Huang, MD, and Maria Palaiou, MS, Pittsburgh, PA; the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee voting members Donald J. D’Amico, MD, Mark W. Johnson, MD, J. Richard Landis, PhD, and nonvoting ex-officio member, Dr. Musch; and Giorgio Dorin for his contribution to the manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the materials presented herein. Address correspondence to Thomas R. Friberg, MS, MD, UPMC Eye Center, 203 Lothrop Street, Suite 824, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20091030-01