Search

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a major complication in patients with diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Diabetes mellitus (DM) has deleterious effects on the immune system resulting in an increased risk of infections. We evaluated patients with DLBCL who started frontline treatment with R-CHOP, and compared outcomes according to presence of DM comorbidity. Between 2013 and 2018, 218 patients with DLBCL were included. 46 patients (21%) had DM. Rate of admissions for FN was higher for patients with DM (0.7 vs. 0.46 admissions/patient

Treatment with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered standard of care (SOC) second-line treatment for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, outcomes remain suboptimal. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing efficacy and safety of SOC versus chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy as second-line for patients with LBCL refractory or relapsing within 12 months. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Three trials published in 2021 (involving 865 participants) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. EFS as well as OS were significantly improved with CAR-T therapy as compared to SOC, hazard ratio (HR) 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.68) and HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.60-0.98) respectively. CAR-T therapy was associated with significantly better ORR, relative risk (RR) 1.55 (95% CI 1.12-2.13, p = 0.001). The risk of Grade III/IV adverse event was comparable between the two arms, RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.93-1.14). In summary, CAR-T therapy has superior outcomes as compared to SOC in patients with LBCL refractory or relapsing within 12 months, without excess of toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results and determine the optimal sequencing of CAR-T therapy in the management of LBCL.

Almost half of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease after frontline immunochemotherapy. Although guidelines recommend histological confirmation of R/R disease, repeat biopsies are not always performed. We conducted a two-part study: a nationwide case-vignette survey among treating hematologists, and a single center retrospective analysis. In the survey part, all 64 participating physicians opted not to perform a repeat biopsy in at least one scenario, more often in refractory cases. In the retrospective part, 116 episodes of R/R aNHL among 61 patients were identified. Repeat biopsy was not performed in 72%, more often in refractory episodes, mostly due to low likelihood of alternative diagnoses or problematic location for biopsy. Our study suggests that many patients do not undergo repeat biopsy in R/R DLBCL, especially in refractory cases. Future studies and recommendations should address the necessity of repeat biopsy, according to patient and disease related characteristics.

Polatuzumab (Pola)-based regimens and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cells provide superior outcome compared to conventional chemoimmunotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). Choosing between these strategies remains controversial. The efficacy of CAR T versus Pola-rituximab(R) /Pola-bendamustine(B)-R in R/R DLBCL patients after failing ≥2 lines of treatment was compared in a retrospective, 'real-world' study. Propensity score matching, for age, lymphoma category (de-novo/transformed), number of prior lines, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and lactate dehydrogenase level, was applied to control for differences in patients' characteristics. Response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. A total of 82 patients, treated with CAR T (n=41) or Pola-based regimens (n=41), were included. No treatment-related deaths occurred with CAR T vs. 3 (7.3%) with Pola. The overall and complete response rates were 83% and 58% with CAR T vs. 66% and 44% with Pola-based-regimens (p=0.077 and p=0.18, respectively). At a median follow-up of 9 months (range 1-19.2) and 16 months (range 0.7-25.3) for the CAR T and Pola arm respectively, the median PFS has not been reached for CAR T vs. 5.6 months for Pola (95% CI 3.6-7.6, p=0.014). Median OS has not been reached for CAR T vs. 10.8 months (95% CI 2.2-19.4) for Pola (p=0.026). To conclude, in a real-world setting, treatment with CAR T achieved superior PFS and OS compared to Pola-based regimens in patients with R/R DLBCL.

Late onset neutropenia (LON) after rituximab is a previously described complication. We aimed to assess and characterize LON after obinutuzumab, a novel anti-CD20 antibody, in the real-world setting and compare it to LON after rituximab therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 330 consecutive patients with lymphoproliferative neoplasms (rituximab-treated n = 283; obinutuzumab-treated n = 47). LON occurred in 23% patients with similar incidence in rituximab (n = 66, 23%) or obinutuzumab (n = 10, 21%) groups (p = 0.853). Patients treated for CLL and post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) were at higher risk to develop LON (multivariate analysis: HR for CLL - 6.62 CI 95% 1.33-32.92; HR for PTLD 15.82 CI 95% 2.04-122.4). Febrile neutropenia was uncommon during LON and occurred in 15 patients (4.5%; rituximab (n = 14) and obinutuzumab (n = 1).These data suggest that LON after obinutuzumab treatment is as common as with rituximab. The similarities in LON after rituximab and obinutuzumab argue for a possible class effect for anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies.

Patients with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a poor prognosis and a median overall survival of less than 6 months. Outcomes and responses were evaluated in 134 patients with DLBCL administered selinexor. Our findings demonstrate that selinexor treatment in DLBCL patients can safely induce durable responses and improve outcomes regardless of prior treatments and refractory status. Background: Despite a number of treatment options, patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease has become refractory to treatment have a poor prognosis. Selinexor is a novel, oral drug that is approved to treat patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. In this post hoc analysis of the SADAL study, a multinational, open-label study, we evaluated subpopulations to determine if response to single agent selinexor is impacted by number of lines of prior treatment, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), response to first and most recent therapies, and time to progressive disease. Patients: Patients (n = 134) with DLBCL after 2-5 prior therapies were enrolled in SADAL and received 60mg selinexor twice weekly. Results: The median overall survival was 9.0 months and median progression free survival was 2.6 months. Patients who had the best overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were those who had prior ASCT (42.5% and 50.0%) or responded to last line of therapy (35.9% and 43.5%). Patients with primary refractory DLBCL also showed responses (ORR 21.8%). Adverse events between subgroups were similar to the overall study population, the most common being thrombocytopenia (29.1%), fatigue (7.5%), and nausea (6.0%). Conclusion: Regardless of prior therapy and disease refractory status, selinexor treatment demonstrated results consistent with its novel mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance. Thus, single agent oral selinexor can induce deep, durable, and tolerable responses in patients with DLBCL who have recurrent disease after several chemoimmunotherapy combination regimens. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Aim: Evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health utility impact of single-agent selinexor in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients & methods: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) - Lymphoma and EuroQoL five-dimensions five-levels data collected in the single-arm Phase IIb trial SADAL (NCT02227251) were analyzed with mixed-effects models. Results: Treatment responders maintained higher FACT - Lymphoma (p = 3 adverse events and serious adverse events were not associated with clinically meaningful negative QoL impacts.

Treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is standard of care first line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), though outcomes remain suboptimal.We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of R-CHOP vs. R-CHOP + X (addition of another drug to R-CHOP) as first line treatment for DLBCL. We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed and conference proceedings up to September 2020.Our search yielded ten trials including 4206 patients. The added drug was bortezomib or lenalidomide in three trials each, and gemcitabine, bevacizumab and ibrutinib, each drug in one trial. R-CHOP + X was associated with statistically significant improved disease control (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99). The point estimate was in favor of improved overall survival with R-CHOP + X (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.00), although this was not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis revealed improved disease control with the addition of lenalidomide and in patients younger than 60 years. R-CHOP + X was associated with an increase in serious adverse events and grade III/IV hematologic toxicity.The addition of another drug to frontline R-CHOP treatment for DLBCL did not result in a significant improvement in OS, although we did observe improved disease control compared to R-CHOP, perhaps most evident with the addition of lenalidomide. Yet, RCHOP + X was associated with an increased risk for serious and hematological adverse events. Further studies could reveal subgroups that would benefit most from augmentation of standard R-CHOP.

Primary cardiac lymphoma is a rare and lethal tumor. We describe a patient with right coronary artery floating sign, a specific radiologic sign. Despite rapid diagnosis and guideline-directed medical therapy, disease relapsed and the patient died. Nevertheless, this case highlights the crucial role of imaging in cardiac tumors. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.), Central Illustration

Rituximab, the first anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has dramatically improved outcomes for patients with B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Obinutuzumab was developed to potentiate activity and overcome resistance to rituximab. Clinical data suggest that obinutuzumab is superior to rituximab in follicular lymphoma (FL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Yet, it has increased toxicity. This systematic review and meta-analysis compiled all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing obinutuzumab-based regimens with rituximab-based regimens to better assess their toxicity profile. Primary outcome was grade 3-4 infections; secondary outcomes included any adverse events (AE), grade 3-4 AE, drug discontinuation rate, and 3-years mortality. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated and pooled using a fixed-effect model, unless there was significant heterogeneity, in which case a random-effects model was used. Our comprehensive search yielded five RCTs conducted between 2009 and 2014, including 4247 patients. The trials included FL patients, CLL and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Monoclonal antibodies were given with different chemotherapy regimens (in four trials) or as monotherapy (in one trial). The point estimate favored increase in both grade 3-4 infections rate (RR 1.17 [95% CI, 1.0-1.36]) and any AE rate (RR 1.05 [95% 1-1.1]) with obinutuzumab, although this was not statistically significant. There was a significantly increased rate of grade 3-4 AE (RR 1.15 [95% CI, 1.09-1.2]), as well as grade 3-4 toxicities including thrombocytopenia (RR 2.8 [95% CI, 1.92-4.06]), infusion related reactions (RR 2.8 [95% CI, 2.16-3.64]) and cardiac events (RR 1.65 [95% CI, 1.11-2.46]). There was no significant difference in grade 3-4 anemia and neutropenia nor in the 3-year mortality rate. The point estimate favored increase in discontinuation rate due to AE with obinutuzumab, although without statistical significance (RR 1.24 [95% CI, 1.0-1.54]). In conclusion, physicians need to weigh the clinical benefits of this agent against higher toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive cancer with a median overall survival of less than 6 months. We aimed to assess the response to single-agent selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export, in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who had no therapeutic options of potential clinical benefit. METHODS: SADAL was a multicentre, multinational, open-label, phase 2b study done in 59 sites in 19 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with pathologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, who had received two to five lines of previous therapies, and progressed after or were not candidates for autologous stem-cell transplantation were enrolled. Germinal centre B-cell or non-germinal centre B-cell tumour subtype and double or triple expressor status were determined by immunohistochemistry and double or triple hit status was determined by cytogenetics. Patients received 60 mg selinexor orally on days 1 and 3 weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The study was initially designed to evaluate both 60 mg and 100 mg twice-weekly doses of selinexor; however, the 100 mg dose was discontinued in the protocol (version 7.0) on March 29, 2017, when an improved therapeutic window was observed at 60 mg. Primary outcome was overall response rate. The primary outcome and safety were assessed in all patients who received 60 mg selinexor under protocol version 6.0, or enrolled under protocol versions 7.0 or higher and received at least one dose of selinexor. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02227251 (active but not enrolling). FINDINGS: Between Oct 21, 2015, and Nov 2, 2019, 267 patients were randomly assigned, with 175 allocated to the 60 mg group and 92 to the discontinued 100 mg group. 48 patients assigned to the 60 mg group were excluded due to enrolment before version 6.0 of the protocol; the remaining 127 patients received selinexor 60 mg and were included in analyses of primary outcome and safety. The overall response rate was 28% (36/127; 95% CI 20·7-37·0); 15 (12%) achieved a complete response and 21 (17%) a partial response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n=58), neutropenia (n=31), anaemia (n=28), fatigue (n=14), hyponatraemia (n=10), and nausea (n=8). The most common serious adverse events were pyrexia (n=9), pneumonia (n=6), and sepsis (n=6). There were no deaths judged as related to treatment with selinexor. INTERPRETATION: Single-drug oral selinexor induced durable responses and had a manageable adverse events profile in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who received at least two lines of previous chemoimmunotherapy. Selinexor could be considered a new oral, non-cytotoxic treatment option in this setting. FUNDING: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.

High dose methotrexate (HDMTX)-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well-known adverse event in hemato-oncology patients. Our purpose was to define factors and setup cut-offs that may help better identify patients at-risk for developing AKI following HDMTX. All consecutive patients who received MTX dose ≥1 g were retrospectively reviewed. We compared patients with or without renal toxicity. We used a logistic regression model to define baseline variables associated with AKI. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method employing log-rank test. Between 2012 and 2017, 160 patients were included with a total of 265 courses. Indications included: primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, CNS prophylaxis in other lymphoma types, acute lymphatic leukemia and others. Median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range, 18-84), 54% were males, median MTX dose was 1941 mg/m2 (range, 743-5442) and AKI developed in 9% of drug administrations (n = 24). In univariate analysis: age > 40, LDH > 380 units/L, eGFR 380 units/L (OR = 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-20.9, P = .04) and albumin levels 380 units/L and albumin

The phase 2b, open-label, multicenter SADAL study evaluated single agent oral selinexor, a selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound, in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after >= 2 lines of systemic therapy. Similar activity was observed in GCB- and non-GCB DLBCL with a trend to higher response rates in DLBCL transformed from follicular lymphoma. Lower response rates were observed in double expressor DLBCL; higher response rates were observed in patients with baseline hemoglobin >= 10 g/dL and normal levels of C-MYC or BCL-2 expression (51%). Overall, strong single agent activity with selinexor were observed in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.Background: The SADAL study evaluated oral selinexor in patients with relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. In this post-hoc analysis, we analyzed the outcomes of the SADAL study by DLBCL subtype to determine the effects of DLBCL subtypes on efficacy and tolerability of selinexor. Patients and Methods: Data from 134 patients in SADAL were analyzed by DLBCL subtypes for overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), duration of treatment response, progression-free survival, and adverse events rate. Results: ORR in the entire cohort was 29.1%, and similar in patients with germinal center (GCB) versus non-GCB DLBCL (31.7% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.45); transformed DLBCL showed a trend towards higher ORR than de novo DLBCL: 38.7% vs. 26.2% (P = 0.23). Despite similar prior treatment regimens and baseline characteristics, patients with DLBCL and normal C-MYC/BCL-2 protein expression levels had a significantly higher ORR (46.2% vs.14.8%, P = 0.012) and significantly longer OS (medians 13.7 vs. 5.1 months, hazard ratio 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23-0.77], P = 0.004) as compared with those whose DLBCL had C-MYC and BCL-2 overexpression. Among patients who had normal expression levels of either C-MYC or BCL-2 and baseline hemoglobin levels >= 10g/dL, ORR was 51.5% (n = 47), with median OS of 15.5 months and median PFS of 4.6 months. Similar rates of adverse events were noted in all subgroups. Conclusions: Overall, single agent oral selinexor showed strong responses in patients with limited treatment alternatives regardless of germinal center B-cell type or disease origin. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

The clinical value of FDG-PET/CT for staging and monitoring treatment response in patients with aggressive lymphoma is well established. Conversely, its role in the assessment and management of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is less conclusive. We aimed to assess clinical, laboratory, and pathological predictors for FDG uptake in these patients, in an attempt to identify MZL patients whose management will benefit from this imaging modality.In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we included all adult patients diagnosed with MZL at the Rabin Medical Center between January 2006 and December 2020 who underwent FDG-PET/CT at the time of diagnosis. Primary outcomes were FDG avidity (defined as a visual assessment of at least moderate intensity), SUVmax, and SUVliver. Variables such as advanced clinical stage, primary disease site, hemoglobin level (Hb), platelet count (Plt), serum albumin, LDH level, β-2 microglobulin, and Ki 67 index were evaluated univariate and multivariate analysis using logistic and linear regression models. Association between FDG avidity and progression-free and overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis.A total of 207 MZL patients were included in this study, 76 of whom (36.7%) had FDG-avid disease. Baseline patients' characteristics such as age, gender, and comorbid conditions were similar between patients with and without significant FDG uptake. In a multivariate logistic regression model, non-gastric MALT (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.78-10), Ki 67 index ≥ 15% (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.36-9.76), and elevated LDH level (OR 8.6, 95% CI 3.2-22.8) were all associated with positive FDG avidity. In a multivariate linear regression model, a combination of advanced clinical stage, specific disease subtypes, LDH level, and Ki 67 index predicted the value of SUVmax (P value 0.001; adjusted RIn this retrospective cohort study, we present prediction models for positive FDG uptake and SUVmax in MZL patients. These models aim to help clinicians choose patients suitable for incorporation of FDG-PET/CT for staging and monitoring disease and reduce the costs of redundant tests.

Background For patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), disease relapse remains the most common reason for transplant failure and patient death. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have aimed to reduce the risk of relapse by means of post-transplant maintenance therapy. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of maintenance with observation or placebo in patients with AML after allogeneic HSCT. We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed and conference proceedings up to Febuary 2021. Results Our search yielded five trials including 736 patients. Maintenance therapy consisted of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in 3 studies (sorafenib 2 studies; midostaurin 1 study) and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in 2 studies (decitabine and azacytidine 1 study each). Maintenance therapy was associated with an improved overall survival (OS), HR = 0.61 (95% CI 0.47-0.80). Subgroup analysis revealed advantage in OS with either TKI or HMA maintenance. Relapse free survival (RFS) was also improved in the maintenance arm compared with the control arm HR = 0.51(95% CI 0.40 - 0.66). There was no difference between the two arms in overall grade 3/4 adverse events or overall infections, in grade 3/4 infections, or in acute and chronic graft versus host disease. Conclusions Our meta-analysis shows that post-transplant maintenance therapy in AML patients is effective in improving RFS and OS, with a satisfactory safety profile.

Patients with RR DLBCL who have received ≥ 2 lines of therapy have limited treatment options and an expected overall survival (OS) of < 6 months. The SADAL study evaluated single-agent oral selinexor in patients with RR DLBCL and demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.1% with median duration of response (DOR) of 9.3 months. The analyses described here evaluated a number of subpopulations in order to understand how response correlates with survival outcomes in order to identify patients who could most optimally benefit from selinexor treatment. Median age was 67 years; 44.8% of patients were ≥ 70 years of age. The median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI 6.2, 13.7) at a median follow-up of 14.8 months. The median OS was not reached in patients with a CR or PR, while patients who did not respond have a median OS of 4.9 months (p < 0.0001). Patients < 70 years had an OS of 11.1 months compared with 7.8 months in patients ≥ 70 years. Among patients with or without prior ASCT, the median OS was 10.9 and 7.8 months, respectively. Among patients with disease refractory to the most recent DLBCL treatment regimen, the median OS was 7.0 months compared with 11.1 months for disease not refractory to the most recent treatment. In a patient population in which survival is expected to be < 6 months, treatment with single-agent oral selinexor was associated with a median survival of 9 months. Increased median OS observed in patients responding to selinexor was consistent across subgroups regardless of age, prior ASCT therapy, or refractory status. Randomized studies of selinexor in combination with a variety of other anti-DLBCL agents are planned. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02227251) on August 28, 2014. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02227251., SCOPUS: le.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Romidepsin is a class I selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), treated with at least one prior systemic therapy. Currently, there is paucity of real-life data on the efficacy and safety of romidepsin in R/R T-cell lymphoma. This national, multicenter study presents real-life data on the efficacy and safety of romidepsin in R/R T-cell lymphoma. Patients diagnosed and treated with romidepsin for R/R CTCL or PTCL between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), and adverse events. Fifty-three patients with R/R PTCL (n = 42) or CTCL (n = 11) were included. Among CTCL patients, median OS was not reached, ORR was 25%, and none achieved CR. Among PTCL patients, median OS was 7.1 months, EFS was 1.9 months, ORR rate was 33%, and 12.5% achieved CR. In a univariate analysis, predictors for longer EFS include any response to therapy, number of previous lines, and PTCL subclass (with better results for angioimmunobalstic T-cell lymphoma). In a univariate and multivariate analysis for OS, treatment response was the only factor predicting OS (OR 4.48; CI 95%, 1.57-12.79; P = .005). Most grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hematological (35%). Infections were reported in 34% of patients. This real-life experience with romidepsin confirms the results of the pivotal phase II trials. PTCL subtype and the number of previous lines of therapy have an impact on EFS. In addition, patients who had good response to romidepsin benefited most in terms of both EFS and OS. Efforts should be done to identify those patients.

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is common in young adults and considered curable in most patients. Young HL survivors (HLS) are at risk of long-term adverse effects. Our study aimed to assess various fatigue and quality of life (QoL) complaints, and their correlations with treatment. Self-reported questionnaires assessing fatigue (MFI-20) and QoL-related issues (EORTC-QOL-C-30) were used to examine HLS aged 18-65 who completed first-line chemotherapy ± radiotherapy (RT) and were in complete remission for at least six months post-therapy. The cohort included 120 HLS (median age 32 years), assessed between 6 months and 15 years post-treatment. About 28% presented with severe fatigue and severely reduced QoL. Higher fatigue levels were associated with four cycles of the ABVD + RT. Young HLS experience high levels of persistent physical fatigue, emotional distress, and cognitive decline that are insufficiently investigated. Assessment of these complaints is essential and further investigation may provide tailored solutions for a better QoL for HLS.

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who progress after exposure to hypomethylating agents (HMA) have a dismal prognosis. We hypothesized that the addition of venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, to AML patients who previously failed HMA might overcome resistance. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with AML were eligible if leukemia relapsed after, or was refractory to HMA. In general, in addition to venetoclax, patients continued HMA or other low-intensity therapies. Patients who previously underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) were also eligible. Data were analyzed in November 2018. Twenty-three patients were treated between October 2016 and October 2018 and were eligible for this study. Median age was 76 years and 6 patients had leukemia that relapsed post allogeneic HCT. None of the patients experienced tumor lysis syndrome and toxicities were as expected and manageable. Febrile neutropenia was the most common toxicity (78% of patients). Median hospitalization time was 13 days. Forty-three percent of the patients achieved CR/CRi. Overall survival (OS) was 74% at 6 months and median OS in patients who achieved remission was 10.8 months. Higher number of blasts in both bone marrow and peripheral blood was associated with lower chances of CR, while higher WBC, LDH, and bone marrow or peripheral blasts were associated with increased mortality rate. The addition of venetoclax to patients with HMA-refractory AML may result in a substantial anti-leukemic activity, specifically in those achieving complete remission. This should be further tested in a well-designed prospective trial.

The reported prevalence of hypercalcemia at diagnosis in non-Hodgkin-lymphoma ranges between 1.3% and 7.4%. These studies included all patients, regardless of lymphoma subtype. We performed a retrospective case-control study to determine the prevalence of hypercalcemia at time of diagnosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Among 250 newly diagnosed patients, 46 (18%) had hypercalcemia. When compared with age-sex matched patients and normal calcium levels, those with hypercalcemia had higher levels of LDH, lower levels of albumin and more advanced stage. These differences were translated to shorter progression-free-survival and overall survival, but only in patients with hypercalcemia and low levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH). These findings suggest that in newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL, hypercalcemia is more frequent than previously appreciated. Furthermore, lymphoma-related but not primary hyperparathyroidism-related hypercalcemia is associated with adverse prognostic factors and adverse clinical outcomes in DLBCL. Hence, PTH should be obtained in patients with DLBCL and hypercalcemia at diagnosis.

60th Annual Meeting of the American-Society-of-Hematology (ASH) -- DEC 01-04, 2018 -- San Diego, CA Jurczak, Wojciech/0000-0003-1879-8084; Johnson, Peter/0000-0003-2306-4974; ZINZANI, PIER LUIGI/0000-0002-2112-2651; Leppa, Sirpa/0000-0002-8265-511X WOS: 000468868300004 PubMed: 30901302 PURPOSE Ibrutinib has shown activity in non-germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This double-blind phase III study evaluated ibrutinib and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in untreated non-germinal center B-cell DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to ibrutinib (560 mg per day orally) plus R-CHOP or placebo plus R-CHOP. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the activated B-cell (ABC) DLBCL subgroup. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS A total of 838 patients were randomly assigned to ibrutinib plus R-CHOP (n = 419) or placebo plus R-CHOP (n = 419). Median age was 62.0 years; 75.9% of evaluable patients had ABC subtype disease, and baseline characteristics were balanced. Ibrutinib plus R-CHOP did not improve EFS in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.934) or ABC (HR, 0.949) population. A preplanned analysis showed a significant interaction between treatment and age. In patients age younger than 60 years, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP improved EFS (HR, 0.579), PFS (HR, 0.556), and OS (HR, 0.330) and slightly increased serious adverse events (35.7% v 28.6%), but the proportion of patients receiving at least six cycles of R-CHOP was similar between treatment arms (92.9% v 93.0%). In patients age 60 years or older, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP worsened EFS, PFS, and OS, increased serious adverse events (63.4% v 38.2%), and decreased the proportion of patients receiving at least six cycles of R-CHOP (73.7% v 88.8%). CONCLUSION The study did not meet its primary end point in the ITT or ABC population. However, in patients age younger than 60 years, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP improved EFS, PFS, and OS with manageable safety. In patients age 60 years or older, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP was associated with increased toxicity, leading to compromised R-CHOP administration and worse outcomes. Further investigation is warranted. (C) 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology Amer Soc Hematol Janssen Global Services; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748] Supported by Janssen Global Services, which also provided writing and editorial support, and by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant No. P30 CA008748 (A.Y.).

We evaluated the role of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography ([18F] FDG-PET) with computed tomography (CT) (PET/CT) as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in newly diagnosed marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) patients. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed MZL, treated with immunotherapy, chemotherapy regimens, surgery, or Helicobacter pylori eradication between 2008 and 2016 in a single tertiary center. Only patients who had a pretreatment PET/CT (P-PET/CT) were included. P-PET/CT, interim (I-PET/CT), and end-of-treatment PET/CT (E-PET/CT) studies were reviewed. P-PET/CT results were reported using two methods of evaluation, qualitative and semi quantitative: visual assessment (VAS) and maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and I-PET and E-PET results were reported by Deauville 5-point score (DS) evaluation as well. Avidity of PET/CT was defined as abnormal uptake in any of these methods. The primary outcome was the prognostic role of P-PET/CT, I-PET/CT, and E-PET/CT on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Data of 196 patients with MZL were identified, 110 of which had P-PET/CT and were included in this analysis. Median age was 67 years (range 18-93). The median follow-up period was 63 months (range 3-278). The median OS and PFS for the whole cohort were 63 (interquartile range 39-85) and 60 (interquartile range 37-76) months, respectively. The avidity of PET at baseline for the whole cohort was 70% (77/110 patients), for MALT lymphoma, 62.5% (40/64 patients), for NMZL, 76.4% (13/17 patients), and for SMZL, 82.7% (24/29 patients). When adjusted for IPI, sex, and comorbidities, positive E-PET/CT was associated with reduced PFS with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.4 (95% CI, 1.27-9.14, P = 0.02). Positive E-PET/CT did not correlate with OS. However, there were only three events. P-PET/CT was not predictive of PFS or OS. Our study demonstrates that above 70% of MZL are FDG avid. Positive E-PET/CT is a strong prognostic factor for PFS.

7570 Background: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening inflammatory syndrome that may complicate hematologic malignancies (HM). We recently developed a simplified diagnostic and prognostic index termed the ‘optimized HLH inflammatory’ (OHI) index comprising the combined elevation of sCD25 ( > 3,900 U/mL) and serum ferritin ( > 1,000 ng/mL), which in HM patients both identifies HLH and predicts mortality more accurately than conventional criteria for HLH. In this study, we examined whether mortality in our cohort is directly related to progressive malignancy vs. HLH-associated causes in OHI+ and OHI- patients. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma from Israel, the USA, and Japan for whom sCD25 and ferritin levels were measured either as routine surveillance or during investigation for HLH and classified patients by their OHI status. The International Prognostic Index, International Prognostic Score, and Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index were used to estimate the predicted prognosis of T/B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma, respectively. Predicted five-year overall survival was calculated based on the relevant prognostic index and was compared between OHI+ and OHI- patients using the unpaired t-test. The actual survival at five years/last follow-up was recorded, as was the cause of death. The odds ratios (ORs) for observed vs. predicted mortality, and for HLH- vs. malignancy-related death were calculated using the Chi-square test. Results: 100 lymphoma patients were studied: 65% with B cell NHL, 18% with natural killer/ T cell lymphoma, 17% with Hodgkin’s lymphoma; 37 were OHI+, and 63 were OHI-. The disease-relevant international prognostic index-predicted five-year survival did not differ between OHI + and OHI- patients (a mean of 58% n OHI+ and 57% in OHI- p = 0.62). However, the observed five-year survival in OHI+ patients was lower (12%) than predicted, reflecting a mortality incidence that was four times higher than predicted by the relevant prognostic score (OR 3.9; CI 1.3-12.1). By contrast, OHI- patients had better survival (79%) than predicted by their prognostic scores (OR 0.15; CI 0.07-0.34). More than half of the OHI+ patients died from non-malignant causes (39% multi-organ dysfunction or HLH, 18% infection), while most OHI- patients (92%) died from progressive malignancy. The likelihood of dying from multi-organ dysfunction or HLH was 26 times higher in OHI+ vs. OHI- patients (OR 26.2; CI 4.1-286.7). Conclusions: OHI index status strongly correlated with mortality in patients with lymphoma within our cohort, and death in OHI+ patients was largely due to causes other than progressive malignancy. The OHI index appears to identify a harmful inflammatory state and deserves further prospective study.

Patients with lymphoma, especially those treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, suffer high COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to assess the ability of lymphoma patients to generate a sufficient humoral response after two injections of BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine and to identify factors influencing the response. Antibody titers were measured with the SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott ) assay in blood samples drawn from lymphoma patients 4 2 weeks after the second dose of vaccine. The cutoff for a positive response was set at 50 AU/mL. Positive serological responses were observed in 51% of the 162 patients enrolled in this cross-sectional study. In a multivariate analysis, an interval of 1 year after this therapy. The latter percentage was equal to that of patients never exposed to monoclonal antibodies. In conclusion, lymphoma patients, especially those recently treated with anti- CD20 monoclonal antibodies, fail to develop sufficient humoral response to BNT162b2 vaccine. While a serological response is not the only predictor of immunity, its low level could make this population more vulnerable to COVID-19, which implies the need for a different vaccination schedule for such patients.

Data regarding efficacy and toxicity of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in the elderly, geriatric population are insufficient. In 2019, tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene-ciloleucel were commercially approved for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. From May 2019 onwards, 47 relapsed/refractory diffuse large Bcell lymphoma patients, ≥70 years underwent lymphopharesis in three Israeli centers. Elderly (n=41, mean age 76.2 years) and young (n=41, mean age 55.4 years) patients were matched based on ECOG performance status and lactose dehydrogenase levels. There were no differences in CD4/CD8 ratio (P=0.94), %CD4 naive (P=0.92), %CD8 naive (P=0.44) and exhaustion markers (both HLA-DR and PD-1) between CAR-T cell products in both cohorts. Forty-one elderly patients (87%) received CAR-T cell infusion. There were no differences in the incidence of grade ≥3 cytokine-release-syndrome (P=0.29), grade≥3 neurotoxicity (P=0.54), and duration of hospitalization (P=0.55) between elderly and younger patients. There was no difference in median D7-CAR-T cell expansion (P=0.145). Response rates were similar between the two groups (complete response 46% and partial response 17% in the elderly group, P=0.337). Non-relapse mortality at 1 and 3 months was 0 in both groups. With a median follow-up of 7 months (range, 1.3-17.2 months), 6- and 12-months progression-free and overall survival in elderly patients were 39% and 32%, and 74% and 69%, respectively. EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires, obtained at 1 month, showed worsening of disability and cancer-related-symptoms in elderly versus younger patients. We conclude that outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy are comparable between elderly, geriatric and younger patients, indicating that age as per se should not preclude CAR-T cell administration. Longer rehabilitation therapy is essential to improve disabilities and long-term symptoms.

The efficacy of polatuzumab vedotin in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outside clinical study are undetermined. This retrospective study examined the efficacy and safety of polatuzumab vedotin administered in real life settings. Forty-seven patients, 31 with

Background: Relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma (RR DLBCL) is an aggressive cancer with a median survival of less than 6 months. The SADAL trial aims to assess the response to the oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) selinexor in patients with RR DLBCL who have no therapeutic options of demonstrated clinical benefit. Methods: SADAL was a multicenter, open-label Phase 2b study conducted at 59 sites globally. Patients 18 years with previously treated, pathologically confirmed de novo DLBCL, or DLBCL transformed from previously diagnosed indolent lymphoma, and having received at least two prior therapies were enrolled. Germinal center B-cell (GCB) or non-GCB tumor subtype and double/triple expressor status were determined by immunohistochemistry and double/triple hit status was determined by cytogenetic assays. Patients received 60 mg selinexor orally on days 1 and 3 weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR) by central radiologic review. A modified intent-to-treat population was used for all efficacy endpoints. Findings: 127 patients were enrolled from October 21, 2015 through November 2, 2019. The ORR was 28.3% (95% CI: 20.7%, 37.0%), including complete response in 15 (11.8%) and partial response in 21 (16.5%) patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.1 months (95% CI: 6.6, 15.1) with longer OS observed in responding patients. Responses were observed across different subgroups regardless of age, gender, prior therapy, DLBCL subtype, refractory status or prior ASCT therapy. Adverse events were generally reversible and managed with dose modifications and/or standard supportive care. Interpretation: In both GCB- and non-GCB DLBCL subtypes, single agent oral selinexor induced durable responses which were associated with longer survival. Selinexor may be a new oral, non-cytotoxic treatment option for patients with RR DLBCL after two lines of chemo-immunotherapy. Trial Registration: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02227251. Funding Statement: This study (NCT02227251) was funded by Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc, Newton, Massachusetts, USA, which provided all study materials. Declaration of Interests: NK reports research support from Verastem, Gilead, Celgene, and Roche, as well as honoraria from Gilead, Janssen, and Karyopharm. FC reports personal fees from Takeda, Gilead, and Janssen, outside the submitted work. MC reports personal fees from Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Karyopharm, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, and Servier outside the submitted work. GF reports personal fees from Karyopharm and Roche, outside the submitted work. AG reports personal fees and honoraria from AstraZeneca, personal fees and board membership from Cota and Kite/Gilead, personal fees from Janssen, Celgene, Acerta, and research funding from Constellation, Bayer, CALBG, Genentech, Hoffman-La Roche, MD Anderson, Morphosys, Pharmacyclics, and the University of Nebraska, outside the submitted work. OC reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Roche, personal fees and non-financial support from Takeda, BMS, Amgen, Janssen, Abbvie, grants and personal fees from Gilead, and personal fees from Merck, outside the submitted work. BH reports grants and personal fees from Karyopharm, outside the submitted work. UJ reports personal fees from Karyopharm, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Amgen, Miltenyi, and BMS, outside the submitted work. JMS reports honoraria from Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Celgene, Novartis outside the submitted work. MS reports personal fees from Karyopharm during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from Amgen, Abbvie, Gilead, Takeda, Celgene, Pharmacyclics, Astellas, Verastem, Merck, Novartis, Genentech, and Seattle Genetics, outside the submitted work. TPV reports honoraria from WinMedica, Astellas, and Gilead, honoraria, advisory board membership and research support from Takeda, honoraria and advisory board membership from Roche, Bristol, Genesis, and Novartis, advisory board membership at Janssen, honoraria and research support from Merck and Amgen, and research support from Pfizer and Karyopharm. AJ reports personal fees from Karyopharm Therapeutics during the conduct of the study. YL reports personal fees from Karyopharm Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. HC, YL, XM, KC, DM, HW, JS, JRS, SS, and MK are employees of Karyopharm. AJ is a consultant for Karyopharm. MK and SS are stockholders of Karyopharm. SS holds patents (8999996, 9079865, 9714226, PCT/US12/048319, and I574957) on hydrazide containing nuclear transport modulators and uses, and pending patents (PCT/US12/048319, 499/2012, PI20102724, and 2012000928) on hydrazide-containing nuclear transport modulators and uses. All other authors declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval Statement: The institutional review board or independent ethics committee at each study center approved the protocol, and the study was performed in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

We aimed to study whether ciprofloxacin prophylaxis reduces infectious complications in patients undergoing autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT).This is a quasi-experimental, retrospective, before-after study. We compared the incidence of bacterial-related complications among 356 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) (n = 202) and lymphoma (n = 154) who underwent AHCT with (n = 177) or without (n = 179) ciprofloxacin prophylaxis between 03/2007 and 10/2012 and between 10/2012 and 07/2016, respectively, at a single centre.Febrile neutropaenia, bacteraemia, and pneumonia were significantly more common among patients who underwent AHCT during the second study period and did not receive antibacterial prophylaxis compared with patients who underwent AHCT during the first study period and received antibacterial prophylaxis (89.9% (161/179) vs. 83.1% (147/177), difference 6.9%, 95% CI 0-14.1%, P = 0.002; 15.1% (27/179) vs. 4.5% (8/177), difference 10.6%, 95% CI 4.4-16.9%, p 0.0001; 12.3% (22/179) vs. 6.2% (11/177), difference 6.1%, 95% CI 0-12.3%, p = 0.04, respectively). The number-needed-to-treat to prevent one episode of bacteraemia, pneumonia, and febrile neutropaenia was 8.6, 8.5, and 13.7, respectively. Patients with ciprofloxacin prophylaxis had higher rates of ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteraemia (62.5% (5/8) vs. 18.5% (5/27), difference 44%, 95% CI 7-70%, p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, ciprofloxacin prophylaxis significantly decreased the odds of bacteraemia (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.52; p 0.0001) and pneumonia (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.85, p = 0.02).According to our single-centre experience, patients with MM and lymphoma undergoing AHCT may benefit from antibacterial prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin.

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) performed after two chemotherapy cycles (PET-2) has become an accepted prognostic tool in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We evaluated the effect of PET-adapted strategy on outcome in advanced stage HL.In August 2017, we searched electronic databases, conference proceedings and ongoing trials. We included all studies in which treatment modification for advanced HL was performed based on the results of the interim PET scan. The primary analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).We identified 13 studies (4 RCTs, 7 phase II and 2 retrospective studies), conducted between 1999 and 2014, including 6856 patients. Of the four RCTS: one used therapy escalation, one did de-escalation and two trials performed both. Outcomes were assessed at different time point between 2 and 5 years. Three RCTs for de-escalating therapy, obtained similar outcomes despite reducing therapy, with a 2-year PFS of 88-92% (6 escalated BEACOPP (EB) vs. 4 ABVD cycles), a 5-year PFS of 91-92% (6/8 EB vs. 4 EB cycles) and a 5-year PFS of 80-82% (6 ABVD vs. omitting bleomycin after two successful ABVD cycles). Two RCTs implemented escalation. The randomization was between adding rituximab or not. In both trials, it did not affect outcome, with a 4-year PFS of 68-69% (addition of rituximab to BEACOPP after 2 ABVD cycles) and 5-year PFS of 88-90% (addition of rituximab to EB after 2 EB cycles). Performing true randomization between PET-adapted and a standard ABVD control arm was not feasible, given historical data.This systematic review of PET-adapted therapy, mainly based on RCTs, suggests that a change to the treatment paradigm is appropriate in advanced HL.