Search

Objective: Strain has become a viable index for evaluating abdominal aortic aneurysm stability after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). In addition, literature has shown that healthy aortic tissue requires a degree of strain to maintain homeostasis. This has led to the hypothesis that too much strain reduction conferred by a high degree of graft oversizing is detrimental to the aneurysm neck in the seal zone of abdominal aortic aneurysms after EVAR. We investigated this in a laboratory experiment by examining the effects that graft oversizing has on the pressure-normalized strain (ερ+¯/pulse pressure [PP]) reduction using four different infrarenal EVAR endografts and our ultrasound elastography technique. Approximate graft oversizing percentages were 20% (30 mm phantom-graft combinations), 30% (28 mm phantom-graft combinations), and 50% (24 mm phantom-graft combinations). Methods: Axisymmetric, 10% by mass polyvinyl alcohol phantoms were connected to a flow simulator. Ultrasound elastography was performed before and after implantation with the four different endografts: (1) 36 mm polyester/stainless steel, (2) 36 mm polyester/electropolished nitinol, (3) 35 mm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)/nitinol, and (4) 36 mm nitinol/polyester/platinum-iridium. Five ultrasound cine loops were taken of each phantom-graft combination. They were analyzed over two different cardiac cycles (end-diastole to end-diastole), yielding a total of 10 maximum mean principal strain (ερ+¯) values. ερ+¯ was divided by pulse pressure to yield pressure-normalized strain (ερ+¯/PP). An analysis of variance was performed for graft comparisons. We calculated the average percent ερ+¯/PP reduction by manufacturer and percent oversizing. These values were used for linear regression analysis. Results: Results from one-way analysis of variance showed a significant difference in ερ+¯/PP between the empty phantom condition and all oversizing conditions for all graft manufacturers (F(3, 56) = 106.7 [graft A], 132.7 [graft B], 106.5 [graft C], 105.7 [graft D], P < .0001 for grafts A-D). There was a significant difference when comparing the 50% condition with the 30% and 20% conditions across all manufacturers by post hoc analysis (P < .0001). No significant difference was found when comparing the 20% and 30% oversizing conditions for any of the manufacturers or when comparing ερ+¯/PP values across the manufacturers according to percent oversize. Linear regression demonstrated a significant positive correlation between the percent graft oversize and the all-graft average percent ερ+¯/PP reduction (R2 = 0.84, P < .0001). Conclusions: This brief report suggests that a 10% increase in graft oversizing leads to an approximate 5.9% reduction in ερ+¯/PP on average. Applied clinically, this increase may result in increased stiffness in axisymmetric vessels after EVAR. Further research is needed to determine if this is clinically significant. : Clinical Relevance: This research suggests that a higher degree of graft oversizing results in a higher average percent pressure-normalized strain reduction and thus increased mechanical stiffness. There is evidence suggesting that arteries become less pulsatile when they become stiffened. Therefore, decreasing aortic pulsatile flow by implanting a highly oversized graft may have deleterious long-term effects after endovascular aneurysm repair. This may have implications for future graft construction and for the choice of endograft by the surgeon, especially when considering the benefits of strain reduction to the diseased tissue that comprises the aneurysmal sac. In addition, our technique allows for the assessment of dynamic changes to stiffness after graft implantation in vivo.