Search

Inês Leal,1,2 Vasco C Romão,3,4 Sofia Mano,1,2 Nikita Khmelinskii,3,4 Raquel Campanilho-Marques,3,4 Cristina Ponte,3,4 Carla Macieira,3 Filipa Oliveira-Ramos,3,4 Elsa Vieira-Sousa,3,4 Carlos Miranda Rosa,3 Walter Rodrigues,1,2 Luís Abegão Pinto,1,2 Carlos Marques-Neves,1,2 João Eurico Fonseca3,4 1Ophthalmology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Univeristário Lisboa Norte, Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; 2Centro de Estudos das Ciências da Visão, Clínica Universitária de Oftalmologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; 3Rheumatology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; 4Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, PortugalCorrespondence: Inês LealHospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte Fax +351 21 780 5653Email ines.leal@chln.min-saude.ptAbstract: Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) is a group of sight-threatening diseases that generates significant burden for the healthcare systems due to its adverse outcomes, irreversible structural complications in the eye with loss of visual function, limited clinical expertise and low-grade evidence for best practice. The usefulness of multidisciplinary care, specifically close collaboration between Rheumatologists and Ophthalmologists in NIU, has been emphasized in the literature. In this paper, the assessment tools and protocols used in our clinic are depicted and an overview of our activity with a brief description of the patients included in our registry, between 2018 and 2020 is provided. The cohort of 290 patients assessed in our NIU clinic, their demographics, sources of referral, details about immunosuppression treatment, and internal and external collaborations is described. This experience-based manuscript aims to describe the general functioning of our multidisciplinary NIU clinic, highlighting the benefits and drawbacks of multidisciplinary team management in patients with NIU, ultimately initiating a dialogue on what an NIU clinic should be and providing information for newly NIU clinics start-up. In conclusion, establishing a standardized and multidisciplinary clinic in NIU allows to systematically observe and follow-up this infrequent disease at a tertiary hospital level, thus improving quality of care delivery and research avenues.Keywords: uveitis, ophthalmology, rheumatology

IgG4-related disease is a rare fibroinflammatory condition. Prompt recognition is fundamental to initiate treatment and to prevent organ damage. Diagnostic and classification criteria are primarily intended for use by clinicians with established expertise in IgG4-related disease. Absence of disease awareness among primary care physicians and specialists without expertise in IgG4-related disease remains the main cause of diagnostic delay. We aimed to identify red flags that might increase the suspicion of IgG4-related disease in primary and secondary care settings. A task force of experts in IgG4-related disease from the European Reference Network for Rare Connective Tissue Diseases (ERN-ReCONNET), patient representatives, and primary care physicians derived potential red flags for IgG4-related disease through a systematic literature search and a level of agreement exercise. Five red flags reached 100% agreement among experts: swelling in one or more organ system; pancreatic and biliary tree involvement; increased serum IgG4; IgG4 + plasma cell tissue infiltration; and obliterative phlebitis. Red flags for IgG4-related disease are intended for use in primary and secondary care to improve referral to centres of expertise and prompt early diagnosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests GPG received funding from The European Commission within the contract SANTE/2018/B3/030-SI2·813822 to support collaboration with European Reference Network (ERN) ReCONNET as a methodologist in the systematic review on red flags for IgG4-related disease. FF received honoraria from GSK for lectures and plenary presentations at educational events. TA received travel grants from AbbVie and Neovil; declares study support from Janssen; and received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, GSK, and Neovil for lectures and plenary presentations at educational events. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Objectives: With this work, we evaluated the impact of the Lisbon Early ARthritis cliNic (LEARN) on untreated inflammatory arthritis clinical and patient-reported outcomes., Methods: A retrospective cohort study enrolled patients in LEARN since its inception. Patients were followed for 12 months and treated to achieve disease remission. Clinical, structural, and quality of life outcomes were assessed. The early arthritis module of the Portuguese Rheumatic Diseases Registry (Reuma.pt) is described., Results: We assessed 292 patients between 2015 and 2022. Mean symptom duration and DAS-28-4 V-ESR at baseline were 6.2 ± 3.5 months and 5.6 ± 1.3, respectively. Rheumatoid arthritis (56.4%; 40.1% seropositive) and psoriatic arthritis (12.4%) were the most common diagnoses. Most patients were treated with methotrexate (75.3%) combined with low-dose oral prednisolone (88.1%). At 12 months, a mean ΔDAS28-4 V-ESR improvement of 2.3 ± 0.4 was registered, with 29.5% and 48.9% of patients achieving remission (DAS28-4 V-ESR < 2.6) or low disease activity (DAS28-4 V-ESR < 3.2), respectively. Among RA patients only, these figures were 20.6% and 46.6%, respectively. A clinically meaningful functional improvement was observed in 72.1% of the patients. Structural progression was limited, affecting only 16.1% of the patients. Fatigue, anxiety, depression, and quality of life also improved substantially, translated by improvements in FACIT, HADS, EQ5D, and SF-36 scores., Conclusions: A structured, dedicated approach to patients with early arthritis resulted in good clinical, structural, and functional outcomes. Furthermore, our findings suggest the window of opportunity for early intervention may have implications for mental health and global well-being. Key Points • Patient assessment is facilitated by reliable electronic clinical records, such as the early arthritis module of the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt) which we describe here for the first time. • Inflammatory arthritis was confirmed in the majority of patients observed, but the time to first appointment was above the recommended. • Prompt start of conventional therapy allowed significant disease activity improvement and remission to be achieved in about one-third of the patients. • Key patient-reported outcomes elucidate disease impact and confirm the benefit of early treatment initiation, suggesting a window of opportunity also for mental health and global well-being., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: As previously declared, all studies have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Ethical approval was granted by the local authorities, Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa Ethical Commission, by the approval dispatch 138/19. All patients gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that would disclose the identity of the subjects under study were omitted. Disclosures: None., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In this study, we optimized the dissociation of synovial tissue biopsies for single-cell omics studies and created a single-cell atlas of human synovium in inflammatory arthritis. The optimized protocol allowed consistent isolation of highly viable cells from tiny fresh synovial biopsies, minimizing the synovial biopsy drop-out rate. The synovium scRNA-seq atlas contained over 100,000 unsorted synovial cells from 25 synovial tissues affected by inflammatory arthritis, including 16 structural, 11 lymphoid, and 15 myeloid cell clusters. This synovial cell map expanded the diversity of synovial cell types/states, detected synovial neutrophils, and broadened synovial endothelial cell classification. We revealed tissue-resident macrophage subsets with proposed matrix-sensing (FOLR2+COLEC12 high ) and iron-recycling (LYVE1+SLC40A1+) activities and identified fibroblast subsets with proposed functions in cartilage breakdown (SOD2 high SAA1+SAA2+SDC4+) and extracellular matrix remodeling (SERPINE1+COL5A3+LOXL2+). Our study offers an efficient synovium dissociation method and a reference scRNA-seq resource, that advances the current understanding of synovial cell heterogeneity in inflammatory arthritis., Competing Interests: J.L., M.D.P.P.C., T.P., S.L., and M.F.B. are employees of BioMed X GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany. The other authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Objectives: Systemic extraglandular involvement in SS has been reported in one-third of patients but may be more frequent. We aimed to evaluate systemic disease prevalence at baseline and throughout follow-up and find its predictors., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including SS patients followed in a tertiary centre. The cumulative EULAR SS disease activity index (ESSDAI) was calculated by adding each domain's maximum score throughout follow-up. We identified independent predictors of systemic involvement (ESSDAI ≥1 at baseline and/or follow-up) through logistic regression modelling. A survival analysis was conducted to identify predictors of new/worsening ESSDAI domains., Results: A total of 216 patients were included, most of whom had systemic involvement (86%), frequently at diagnosis (76%). Biological (53%) and articular ESSDAI domains (44%) were most commonly involved, but all were affected at least once. Around half of the patients with baseline systemic disease developed an additional/worsening domain throughout follow-up. Although most patients had low disease activity at baseline, 60% eventually reached moderately active disease. Younger age at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) 0.95 (95% CI 0.91, 0.99)], a positive minor salivary gland biopsy [OR 4.08 (95% CI 1.40, 11.86)] and RF [OR 4.67 (95% CI 1.52, 14.33)] were independent predictors of systemic involvement. Patients with baseline constitutional involvement [hazard ratio (HR) 2.23 (95% CI 1.13, 4.40)] and RF [HR 1.89 (95% CI 1.20, 3.00)] were more likely to develop new/worsening systemic disease activity., Conclusion: Systemic involvement is seen in most SS patients. Younger and RF and salivary gland biopsy-positive patients are at higher risk of systemic disease. Around half of patients with systemic involvement experienced aggravated disease over time, especially those with constitutional involvement or RF., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination is recommended for non-immunised patients with rheumatic diseases starting biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). There is some evidence that HBV vaccination is effective in patients under conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), but it is currently unclear whether this also applies to bDMARDs., Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of HBV vaccination in patients with inflammatory arthritides treated with bDMARDs., Methods: A prospective cohort with inflammatory arthritides treated with bDMARDs, negative for anti-HBs and anti-HBc and never vaccinated for HBV was recruited. Engerix B was administered at 0, 1 and 6 months and anti-HBs was reassessed ≥1 month after last dose. Response was defined as anti-HBs≥10 IU/L and compared against vaccinated healthy controls. Disease flare, serious adverse events and immune-related disorders not previously present were recorded., Results: 62 patients, most treated with TNF inhibitors (TNFi), and 38 controls were recruited. Most patients were taking csDMARDs (67.7%) and were in remission/low disease activity (59.4%). Only 20/62 patients (32.3%) had a positive response to vaccination, in comparison to 36/38 age-matched controls (94.7%, p<0.001). Response was seen in 19/51 patients treated with TNFi (37.3%) and in 1/11 (9.1%) patients treated with non-TNFi (p=0.07), including 1/6 treated with tocilizumab (16.7%). Among TNFi, response rates ranged from 4/22 (18.2%) for infliximab to 8/14 (57.1%) for etanercept. No relevant safety issues were identified., Conclusions: HBV vaccination response in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with bDMARDs was poorer than expected. Our data reinforce the recommendation for vaccination prior to starting bDMARDs., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Vaccination is one of the most important measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for frail patients. VACCINATE is a multicentre prospective observational study promoted by the European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ERN ReCONNET) aimed at assessing the long-term outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rare and complex connective tissue diseases (rcCTDs) in terms of efficacy and safety., Methods: Adult rcCTDs patients were eligible for recruitment. Demographic, clinical and vaccination data were collected at enrolment. Follow-up visits were scheduled 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks after completion of the first vaccination cycle; data on adverse events, disease exacerbations and the occurrence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections were collected at these time-points., Findings: 365 rcCTDs patients (87 % female, mean age 51.8 ± 14.6 years) were recruited. Overall, 200 patients (54.8 %) experienced at least one adverse event, generally mild and in most cases occurring early after the vaccination. During follow-up, 55 disease exacerbations were recorded in 39 patients (10.7 %), distributed over the entire observation period, although most frequently within 4 weeks after completion of the vaccination cycle. The incidence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections was 8.9 per 1000 person-months, with no cases within 12 weeks from vaccine administration and an increasing trend of infections moving away from the primary vaccination cycle. Only one case of severe COVID-19 was reported during the study period., Interpretation: COVID-19 vaccination seems effective and safe in rcCTDs patients. The rate of new infections was rather low and serious infections were uncommon in our cohort. No increased risk of disease flares was observed compared to previous disease history; however, such exacerbations may be potentially severe, emphasising the need for close monitoring of our patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Postgraduate rheumatology training programmes are already established at a national level in most European countries. However, previous work has highlighted a substantial level of heterogeneity in the organisation and, in part, content of programmes., Objective: To define competences and standards of knowledge, skills and professional behaviours required for the training of rheumatologists., Methods: A European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) task force (TF) of 23 experts, including two members of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) section of rheumatology, was convened. The mapping phase consisted of the retrieval of key documents on specialty training in rheumatology and other related specialties across a broad set of international sources. The content of these documents was extracted and represented the foundation for the document draft that underwent several rounds of online discussion within the TF, and afterwards was also distributed to a broad group of stakeholders for collecting feedback. The list of generated competences was voted on during the TF meetings, while the level of agreement (LoA) with each statement was established by anonymous online voting., Results: A total of 132 international training curricula were retrieved and extracted. In addition to the TF members, 253 stakeholders commented and voted on the competences through an online anonymous survey. The TF developed (1) an overarching framework indicating the areas that should be addressed during training, (2) 7 domains defining broad areas that rheumatology trainees should master by the end of the training programme, (3) 8 core themes defining the nuances of each domain and (4) 28 competences that trainees should acquire to cover each of the areas outlined in the overarching framework. A high LoA was achieved for all competences., Conclusion: These points to consider for EULAR-UEMS standards for the training of European rheumatologists are now defined. Their dissemination and use can hopefully contribute to harmonising training across European countries., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: What baseline predictors would be involved in mortality in people with primary Sjögren syndrome (SjS) remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the baseline characteristics collected at the time of diagnosis of SjS associated with mortality and to identify mortality risk factors for all-cause death and deaths related to systemic SjS activity measured by the ESSDAI score., Methods: In this international, real-world, retrospective, cohort study, we retrospectively collected data from 27 countries on mortality and causes of death from the Big Data Sjögren Registry. Inclusion criteria consisted of fulfilling 2002/2016 SjS classification criteria, and exclusion criteria included chronic HCV/HIV infections and associated systemic autoimmune diseases. A statistical approach based on a directed acyclic graph was used, with all-cause and Sjögren-related mortality as primary endpoints. The key determinants that defined the disease phenotype at diagnosis (glandular, systemic, and immunological) were analysed as independent variables., Findings: Between January 1st, 2014 and December 31, 2023, data from 11,372 patients with primary SjS (93.5% women, 78.4% classified as White, mean age at diagnosis of 51.1 years) included in the Registry were analysed. 876 (7.7%) deaths were recorded after a mean follow-up of 8.6 years (SD 7.12). Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for all-cause death identified eight Sjögren-related variables (ocular and oral tests, salivary biopsy, ESSDAI, ANA, anti-Ro, anti-La, and cryoglobulins). The multivariate CPH model adjusted for these variables and the epidemiological features showed that DAS-ESSDAI (high vs no high: HR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.27-2.22) and cryoglobulins (positive vs negative: HR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.22-2.42) were independent predictors of all-cause death. Of the 640 deaths with available information detailing the specific cause of death, 14% were due to systemic SjS. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for Sjögren-cause death identified five Sjögren-related variables (oral tests, clinESSDAI, DAS-ESSDAI, ANA, and cryoglobulins). The multivariate competing risks CPH model adjusted for these variables and the epidemiological features showed that oral tests (abnormal vs normal results: HR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.01-1.87), DAS-ESSDAI (high vs no high: HR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.22-1.96) and cryoglobulins (positive vs negative: HR = 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16-2) were independent predictors of SjS-related death., Interpretation: The key mortality risk factors at the time of SjS diagnosis were positive cryoglobulins and a high systemic activity scored using the ESSDAI, conferring a 2-times increased risk of all-cause and SjS-related death. ESSDAI measurement and cryoglobulin testing should be considered mandatory when an individual is diagnosed with SjS., Funding: Novartis., Competing Interests: AR and ADF received the following Grant sor Contracts: R01 DE018209/DE/NIDCR NIH HHS/United States; U54 GM104938/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States; P30 AR053483/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States; P50 AR060804/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States; R01 AR065953/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States. ADF received the following Grants: R01 AR074310/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States; Janssen Research and Development, LLC. ADF reported the following patent: Antibody Tests for Identifying Ro Negative Sjögren's Syndrome and Use as Biomarkers for Dysregulated B Cell Responses, B Cell Lymphoma, Tissue Fibrosis and Salivary Gland Dysfunction. U.S. Patent application 17/797,619, filed August 4, 2022, European Patent application 21750408.3, filed September 14, 2022 and Canadian Patent application, filed September 14, 2022. FA received Grants from Pfizer & Novartis, payments or honoraria from Abbvie, Pfizer, Galapagos, Novartis, BMS, Boeringher, Janssen, and participated on Safety/Advisory Boards of Janssen and Boeringher. MR participated on Safety/Advisory Boards by Janssen and in clinical trials (BMS, Novartis, Servier). PO participated on Safety/Advisory Boards by Fresenius Kabi, Novartis & Boehringer Ingelheim. RG received Grants from Pfizer and Abbvie, payments/honoraria from Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, BMS and Boeringher, and participated on Safety/Advisory Boards by Abbvie, Pfizer, and Boeringher. SR participated on Safety/Advisory Boards by Janssen. TM declared that is working as medical advisor for UCB Pharma Sweden. VCR declared that is working as medical advisor for UCB Pharma Sweden. All other authors declare no competing interests., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background: Synovial tissue research has become widely developed in several rheumatology centres, however, large discrepancies exist in the way synovial tissue is handled and, more specifically, how data pertaining to biopsy procedure, quality check and experimental results are reported in the literature. This heterogeneity hampers the progress of research in this rapidly expanding field. In that context, under the umbrella of European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, we aimed at proposing points to consider (PtC) for minimal reporting requirements in synovial tissue research., Methods: Twenty-five members from 10 countries across Europe and USA met virtually to define the key areas needing evaluation and formulating the research questions to inform a systematic literature review (SLR). The results were presented during a second virtual meeting where PtC were formulated and agreed., Results: Study design, biopsy procedures, tissue handling, tissue quality control and tissue outcomes (imaging, DNA/RNA analysis and disaggregation) were identified as important aspects for the quality of synovial tissue research. The SLR interrogated four databases, retrieved 7654 abstracts and included 26 manuscripts. Three OPs and nine PtC were formulated covering the following areas: description of biopsy procedure, overarching clinical design, patient characteristics, tissue handling and processing, quality control, histopathology, transcriptomic analyses and single-cell technologies., Conclusions: These PtC provide guidance on how research involving synovial tissue should be reported to ensure a better evaluation of results by readers, reviewers and the broader scientific community. We anticipate that these PtC will enable the field to progress in a robust and transparent manner over the coming years., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AN has received consulting and/or speaker’s fees from UCB, CHUGAI, BMS all unrelated to this manuscript. FC has received consulting and/or speaker’s fees from Lilly, Novartis and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript. M-AD'A has received consulting and/or speaker’s fees from Lilly, Novartis, AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Galapagos, and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript. AF has received consulting and/or speaker’s fees from Janssen, GSK, Abbvie, Galapagos and receives research funding from Janssen, GSK, Mestag, Roche and Celsius, all unrelated to this manuscript. EN has received consulting and/or speaker’s fees from Roche, BMS, UCB, Lilly Celgene GmbH, all unrelated to this manuscript. SA has received research funding by Abbvie, Pfizer, BMS and GSK and has received consulting and/or speaker’s fees from Abbvie, Pfizer, BMS, Galapagos, Novartis, Janssen and Lilly all unrelated to this manuscript. JEF has received research funding and/or speaker’s fees from Abbvie, Ache, Biogen, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript. SWT received research funding and/or speaker’s fees from AbbVie, Arthrogen/MeiraGTx, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, GSK, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, all unrelated to this manuscript. VCR has received research funding and non-financial support from Merck Sharp and Dohme; personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer and Janssen; non-financial support from Lilly and Roche, outside the submitted work. MM Supported by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Birmingham. The author(s) views unrelated to the NIHR or the department of Health and Social Care., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To characterise the key epidemiological, clinical, immunological, imaging, and pathological features of the coexistence between sarcoidosis and Sjögren's syndrome (SS)., Methods: All centres included in two large multicentre registries (the Sjögren Syndrome Big Data Consortium and the Sarco-GEAS-SEMI Registry) were contacted searching for potential cases of coexistence between SS and sarcoidosis seen in daily practice. Inclusion criteria were the fulfilment of the current classification criteria both for SS (2016 ACR/EULAR) and sarcoidosis (WASOG). The following features were considered for evaluating a coexisting immunopathological scenario between the two diseases: non-caseating granulomas (NCG), focal lymphocytic sialadenitis (FLS) and positive anti-Ro antibodies., Results: We identified 43 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (38 women, with a mean age of 53 years at diagnosis of SS and of 52 years at diagnosis of sarcoidosis). In 28 (65%) cases, sarcoidosis was diagnosed concomitantly with SS, or during the follow-up of patients with an already diagnosed SS, while in the remaining 15 (35%), SS was diagnosed during the follow-up of an already diagnosed sarcoidosis. Patients in whom sarcoidosis was diagnosed first showed a lower mean age (43.88 vs. 55.67 years, p=0.005) and were less frequently women (73% vs. 96%, p=0.04) in comparison with those in whom sarcoidosis was diagnosed concomitantly with SS, or during the follow-up of an already diagnosed SS. We identified the following immunopathological scenarios: a combination of NCG involving extrasalivary tissues and anti-Ro antibodies in 55% of patients, a coexistence of both pathological scenarios (extrasalivary NCG and FLS in MSGB) in 42% (with positive anti-Ro antibodies in two thirds of cases), and NCG involving salivary glands and anti-Ro antibodies in 3% of cases., Conclusions: We have characterised the largest reported series of patients who fulfilled the current classification criteria for both SS and sarcoidosis. This implies that sarcoidosis (and not just the presence of isolated NCG on salivary gland biopsy) may, like other systemic autoimmune diseases, coexist with SS, and that a sarcoidosis diagnosis does not preclude the development of SS in the future.

Background: Antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) is characterised by the association of inflammatory myopathy, interstitial lung disease (ILD), arthritis, Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) or mechanic's hands (MH), with the presence of anti-aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetase antibodies (anti-ARS). It has been suggested that different anti-ARS may be associated with distinct clinical pictures., Objective: To characterise the clinical and immunological features of a multicentric nationwide cohort of ASyS patients., Methods: This is a multicentre retrospective cohort study including patients with ASyS from nine Portuguese rheumatology centres. Data on patients' demographics, signs and symptoms, laboratory results, pulmonary imaging findings and treatment with immunomodulators were collected. Comparison between patients with different anti-ARS antibodies was made using the Chi-square test for categorical variables and Student's t-test or Man-Whitney test for continuous variables, considering anti-Jo1 positive patients as the reference group., Results: Seventy patients were included (70% female) with a median age in years at disease onset of 52 (15-75) years and median follow-up time of 3 years (range 0-32). The three most common clinical manifestations were ILD (n=53, 75.7%), followed by arthritis (n=43, 61.4%) and myositis (n=37, 52.9%). Forty-three patients were positive for anti-Jo1 (61.4%), 11 for anti-PL12 (15.7%), 10 for anti-PL7 (14.3%), 4 for anti-EJ (5.7%), and 2 for anti-OJ (2.9%) antibodies. Antibody co-positivity with anti-Ro52 antibodies was found in 15 patients (21.4%) and was more prevalent in anti-Jo1 patients. ILD prevalence was similar in the different anti-ARS subgroups, without statistically significant differences. Patients positive for anti-PL7 antibodies had significantly lower risk of presenting arthritis (p =&lt; 0.05) and those positive for anti-PL-12 antibodies had a significantly lower risk of presenting myositis than the reference group of anti-Jo1 positive patients (p =&lt; 0.05). RP was more frequently found in patients positive for anti-PL-12 than in anti-Jo1-positive patients (p =&lt; 0.05). Malignancies were reported in four (5.7%) patients, none of whom were anti-Ro52-positive, and one of such patients had a double malignancy. Only three deaths were reported. Corticosteroids were the most frequently prescribed therapy and the use of immunosuppressive drugs was decided according to the type of predominant clinical manifestation., Conclusion: The three most common clinical manifestations were ILD, followed by arthritis and myositis. Patients positive for anti-PL7 antibodies had significantly lower risk of presenting arthritis and those positive for anti-PL-12 antibodies had a significantly lower risk of presenting myositis than the reference group of anti-Jo1 positive patients. RP was more frequently found in patients positive for anti-PL-12 than in anti-Jo1-positive patients. Corticosteroids were the most frequently prescribed therapy. These results are generally concordant with data retrieved from international cohorts.

Autoantibodies are produced within germinal centers (GC), in a process regulated by interactions between B, T follicular helper (Tfh), and T follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells. The GC dysregulation in human autoimmunity has been inferred from circulating cells, albeit with conflicting results due to diverse experimental approaches. We applied a consistent approach to compare circulating Tfr and Tfh subsets in patients with different autoimmune diseases. We recruited 97 participants, including 72 patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT, n = 18), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n = 16), or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, n = 32), and 31 matched healthy donors (HD). We found that the frequency of circulating T follicular subsets differed across diseases. Patients with HT had an increased frequency of blood Tfh cells (p = 0.0215) and a reduced Tfr/Tfh ratio (p = 0.0338) when compared with HD. This was not observed in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (RA, SLE), who had a reduction in both Tfh (p = 0.0494 and p = 0.0392, respectively) and Tfr (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0001, respectively) cells, resulting in an unchanged Tfr/Tfh ratio. Activated PD-1 + ICOS + Tfh and CD4 + PD-1 + CXCR5 - Tph cells were raised only in patients with SLE (p = 0.0022 and p = 0.0054), without association with disease activity. Our data suggest that GC dysregulation, assessed by T follicular subsets, is not uniform in human autoimmunity. Specific patterns of dysregulation may become potential biomarkers for disease and patient stratification., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

In the last decades, the concept of preclinical rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has become established. In fact, the discovery that disease mechanisms start years before the onset of clinical RA has been one of the major recent insights in the understanding of RA pathogenesis. In accordance with the complex nature of the disease, preclinical events extend over several sequential phases. In a genetically predisposed host, environmental factors will further increase susceptibility for incident RA. In the initial steps of preclinical disease, immune disturbance mechanisms take place outside the joint compartment, namely in mucosal surfaces, such as the lung, gums or gut. Herein, the persistent immunologic response to altered antigens will lead to breach of tolerance and trigger autoimmunity. In a second phase, the immune response matures and is amplified at a systemic level, with epitope spreading and widening of the autoantibody repertoire. Finally, the synovial and bone compartment are targeted by specific autoantibodies against modified antigens, initiating a local inflammatory response that will eventually culminate in clinically evident synovitis. In this review, we discuss the elaborate disease mechanisms in place during preclinical RA, providing a broad perspective in the light of current evidence., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Romão and Fonseca.)

Aim: To determine characteristics associated with more severe outcomes in a global registry of people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and COVID-19., Methods: People with SLE and COVID-19 reported in the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry from March 2020 to June 2021 were included. The ordinal outcome was defined as: (1) not hospitalised, (2) hospitalised with no oxygenation, (3) hospitalised with any ventilation or oxygenation and (4) death. A multivariable ordinal logistic regression model was constructed to assess the relationship between COVID-19 severity and demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medications and disease activity., Results: A total of 1606 people with SLE were included. In the multivariable model, older age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.04), male sex (1.50, 1.01 to 2.23), prednisone dose (1-5 mg/day 1.86, 1.20 to 2.66, 6-9 mg/day 2.47, 1.24 to 4.86 and ≥10 mg/day 1.95, 1.27 to 2.99), no current treatment (1.80, 1.17 to 2.75), comorbidities (eg, kidney disease 3.51, 2.42 to 5.09, cardiovascular disease/hypertension 1.69, 1.25 to 2.29) and moderate or high SLE disease activity (vs remission; 1.61, 1.02 to 2.54 and 3.94, 2.11 to 7.34, respectively) were associated with more severe outcomes. In age-adjusted and sex-adjusted models, mycophenolate, rituximab and cyclophosphamide were associated with worse outcomes compared with hydroxychloroquine; outcomes were more favourable with methotrexate and belimumab., Conclusions: More severe COVID-19 outcomes in individuals with SLE are largely driven by demographic factors, comorbidities and untreated or active SLE. Patients using glucocorticoids also experienced more severe outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MFU-G has received research grants from Pfizer and Janssen, not related to this manuscript. AD-G is supported by the Rheumatology Research Foundation (Scientist Development Award) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CR-S has received research grants from Janssen, not related to this manuscript. AEC has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BMS and GSK, all unrelated to this manuscript. LW has received consulting fees and speaker’s honoraria from Aurinia Pharma unrelated to this manuscript. GJP-E reports no competing interests related to this work. Outside of this work, he reports personal consulting and/or speaking fees from Pfizer, GSK, Janssen and Sanofi (all

Objective: To identify risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and for severe/critical COVID-19, and to assess the humoral response after COVID-19 in these patients., Methods: Nationwide study of adult patients with inflammatory RMDs prospectively followed in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register-Reuma.pt-during the first 6 months of the pandemic. We compared patients with COVID-19 with those who did not develop the disease and patients with mild/moderate disease with those exhibiting severe/critical COVID-19. IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were measured ≥3 months after infection and results were compared with matched controls., Results: 162 cases of COVID-19 were registered in a total of 6,363 appointments. Patients treated with TNF inhibitors (TNFi; OR = 0.160, 95% CI 0.099-0.260, P < 0.001) and tocilizumab (OR 0.147, 95% CI 0.053-0.408, P < 0.001) had reduced odds of infection. Further, TNFi tended to be protective of severe and critical disease. Older age, major comorbidities, and rituximab were associated with an increased risk of infection and worse prognosis. Most patients with inflammatory RMDs (86.2%) developed a robust antibody response. Seroconversion was associated with symptomatic disease (OR 13.46, 95% CI 2.21-81.85, P = 0.005) and tended to be blunted by TNFi (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-1.05; P = 0.057)., Conclusions: TNFi and tocilizumab reduced the risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2. Treatment with TNFi also tended to reduce rates of severe disease and seroconversion. Older age, general comorbidities and rituximab were associated with increased risk for infection and worse prognosis, in line with previous reports. Most patients with RMDs developed a proper antibody response after COVID-19, particularly if they had symptomatic disease., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Cruz-Machado, Barreira, Bandeira, Veldhoen, Gomes, Serrano, Duarte, Rato, Miguel Fernandes, Garcia, Pinheiro, Bernardes, Madeira, Miguel, Torres, Bento Silva, Pestana, Almeida, Mazeda, Cunha Santos, Pinto, Sousa, Parente, Sequeira, Santos, Fonseca and Romão.)

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the clinical off-label use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), including its safety and efficacy in patients with rare and complex rheumatic connective tissue diseases (rCTDs)., Methods: A survey was distributed across experts from ERN-ReCONNET reference centres in order to assess the experience with MMF off-label use. Patient-level data of patients with rCTDs under treatment with MMF was also collected for analysis of safety and efficacy., Results: Twelve experts from eleven centres distributed throughout Europe (7 countries) answered the survey. The experience was concordant in that, despite of its off-label use, experts reported opting frequently for this therapeutic alternative with robust confidence on its efficacy and safety. The analysis of 108 patients with rCTDs under MMF revealed a good safety profile, as well as good clinical outcomes, especially for systemic lupus erythematosus and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. The presence of interstitial lung disease was, as expected, associated with a worse clinical outcome despite use of MMF., Conclusions: MMF is widely used in reference centres for rCTDs. Its safety profile and efficacy seem to be recognised by experts and demonstrated with patient-level analysis. While selected rCTDs will likely remain an off-label indication for MMF, robust data seem to support this therapy as an appropriate alternative for safely and effectively treating many manifestations of rCTDs.

Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is a systemic autoimmune disease that frequently occurs concomitantly with other systemic connective tissue disorders, including rare and complex diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). The presence of SS influences the clinical expression of the other autoimmune diseases, thus offering the unique opportunity to explore the similarities in genetic signatures, as well as common environmental and biologic factors modulating the expression of disease phenotypes. In this review, we will specifically discuss the possibility of defining "SS/SLE" and "SS/SSc" as distinct subsets within the context of connective tissue diseases with different clinical expression and outcomes, thus deserving an individualised assessment and personalised medical interventions.

In order to address the main challenges related to the rare diseases (RDs) the European Commission launched the European Reference Networks (ERNs), virtual networks involving healthcare providers (HCPs) across Europe. The mission of the ERNs is to tackle low prevalence and RDs that require highly specialised treatment and a concentration of knowledge and resources. In fact, ERNs offer the potential to give patients and healthcare professionals across the EU access to the best expertise and timely exchange of lifesaving knowledge, trying to make the knowledge travelling more than patients. For this reason, ERNs were established as concrete European infrastructures, and this is particularly crucial in the framework of rare and complex diseases in which no country alone has the whole knowledge and capacity to treat all types of patients.It has been five years since their kick-off launch in Vilnius in 2017. The 24 ERNs have been intensively working on different transversal areas, including patient management, education, clinical practice guidelines, patients' care pathways and many other fundamental topics. The present work is therefore aimed not only at reporting a summary of the main activities and milestones reached so far, but also at celebrating the first 5 years of the ERN on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculo-skeletal Diseases (ReCONNET), in which the members of the network built together one of the 24 infrastructures that are hopefully going to change the scenario of rare diseases across the EU.

An immunosuppressed 72 year-old woman presented with bilateral hand-fingers tenderness and increased circumference. Serum leukocyte and neutrophil counts were slightly raised and C-reactive protein moderately increased. On ultrasound there was flexor tenosynovitis of the 3rd right and 1st to 4th left hand-fingers and left common flexor tendon sheet. Candida albicans was isolated in synovial fluid cultures and the symptoms resolved with fluconazole. This is the first case reporting bilateral Candida tenosynovitis of the hand, highlighting the possible role of concealed hematogenous spread of opportunistic microorganisms in atypical clinical manifestations in immunocompromised patients.

Objective: To update the recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs), endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology (SPR)., Methods: These treatment recommendations were formulated by Portuguese rheumatologists taking into account previous recommendations, new literature evidence and consensus opinion. At a national meeting, in a virtual format, three of the ten previous recommendations were re-addressed and discussed after a more focused literature review. A first draft of the updated recommendations was elaborated by a team of SPR rheumatologists from the SPR rheumatoid arthritis study group, GEAR. The resulting document circulated among all SPR rheumatologists for discussion and input. The level of agreement with each of all the recommendations was anonymously voted online by all SPR rheumatologists., Results: These recommendations cover general aspects such as shared decision, treatment objectives, systematic assessment of disease activity and burden and its registry in Reuma.pt. Consensus was also achieved regarding specific aspects such as initiation of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs, assessment of treatment response, switching and definition of persistent remission., Conclusion: These recommendations may be used for guidance of treatment with bDMARDs and tsDMARDs in patients with RA. As more evidence becomes available and more therapies are licensed, these recommendations will be updated.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common systemic inflammatory rheumatic disease. It is associated with significant burden at the patient and societal level. Extensive efforts have been devoted to identifying a potential cause for the development of RA. Epidemiological studies have thoroughly investigated the association of several factors with the risk and course of RA. Although a precise etiology remains elusive, the current understanding is that RA is a multifactorial disease, wherein complex interactions between host and environmental factors determine the overall risk of disease susceptibility, persistence and severity. Risk factors related to the host that have been associated with RA development may be divided into genetic; epigenetic; hormonal, reproductive and neuroendocrine; and comorbid host factors. In turn, environmental risk factors include smoking and other airborne exposures; microbiota and infectious agents; diet; and socioeconomic factors. In the present narrative review, aimed at clinicians and researchers in the field of RA, we provide a state-of-the-art overview of the current knowledge on this topic, focusing on recent progresses that have improved our comprehension of disease risk and development., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Romão and Fonseca.)

Objectives: To analyse the frequency and characteristics of post-COVID-19 syndrome in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) affected by acute SARS-CoV-2 infection., Methods: By the first week of April 2021, all centres included in the Big Data Sjögren Consortium were contacted asking for patients included in the Registry diagnosed with SARSCoV-2 infection according to the ECDC guidelines. According to the NICE definitions, symptoms related to COVID-19 were classified as acute COVID-19 (signs and symptoms for up to 4 weeks), ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 (presence of signs and symptoms from 4 to 12 weeks) and post-COVID-19 syndrome (signs and symptoms that continue for > 12 weeks not explained by an alternative diagnosis after a protocolized study)., Results: We identified 132 patients who were followed a mean follow-up of 137.8 days (ranging from 5 days to 388 days) after being diagnosed with COVID-19. In the last visit, 75 (57%) patients remained symptomatic: 68 (52%) remained symptomatic for more than 4 weeks fulfilling the NICE definition for ongoing symptomatic post-COVID-19, and 38 (29%) remained symptomatic for more than 12 weeks fulfilling the definition of post-COVID-19 syndrome. More than 40% of pSS patients reported the persistence of four symptoms or more, including anxiety/depression (59%), arthralgias (56%), sleep disorder (44%), fatigue (40%), anosmia (34%) and myalgias (32%). Age-sex adjusted multivariate analysis identified raised LDH levels (OR 10.36), raised CRP levels (OR 7.33), use of hydroxychloroquine (OR 3.51) and antiviral agents (OR 3.38), hospital admission (OR 8.29), mean length of hospital admission (OR 1.1) and requirement of supplemental oxygen (OR 6.94) as factors associated with a higher risk of developing post-COVID-19 syndrome. A sensitivity analysis including hospital admission in the adjusted model confirmed raised CRP levels (OR 8.6, 95% CI 1.33-104.44) and use of hydroxychloroquine (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.00-6.47) as the key independent factors associated with an enhanced risk of developing post-COVID-19 syndrome., Conclusions: This is the first study that analyses the frequency and characteristics of post-COVID-19 syndrome in patients affected by a systemic autoimmune disease. We found that 57% of patients with pSS affected by COVID-19 remain symptomatic after a mean follow-up of 5 months. The risk of developing post-COVID-19 syndrome in patients who required hospitalisation was 8-times higher than in non-hospitalised patients, with baseline raised CRP levels and the use of hydroxychloroquine being independent risk factors for post-COVID-19.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an uncommon condition, with a wide range of manifestations, characterized by specific antibody production, vasculopathy and fibrosis of the skin and other internal organs. It is a complex disease, which is estimated to be rare in Portugal, although specific incidence data are missing. The aetiology of SSc remains unknown, but is likely to be multifactorial, involving genetic and environmental aspects. Its management is challenging and often requires a multidisciplinary approach. In 2011, we established a dedicated outpatient clinic for patients with SSc. Clinical data of every patient with a confirmed diagnosis of SSc is prospectively registered in Reuma.pt/SSc. In this manuscript, we aim to describe the general functioning of our SSc outpatient clinic, and to characterise the population of patients with SSc who are followed herein.

Purpose of Review: In recent years, the spectrum of neurological manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has been growing. We provide a critical review of the literature with special emphasis on presentation, proposed mechanisms of disease, and treatment of neurological involvement in APS., Recent Findings: Although stroke is the most common cause of neurological manifestations in patients with APS, other neurological disorders have been increasingly associated with the disease, including cognitive dysfunction, headache, and epilepsy. Direct oral anticoagulants have failed to show non-inferiority compared to vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of major thrombotic events. Antiphospholipid antibodies are often found in patients with acute COVID-19 but clear evidence supporting an association between these antibodies and the risk of thrombotic events, including stroke and cerebral venous thrombosis, is still lacking. APS patients may present with several distinct neurological manifestations. New criteria will facilitate the classification of patients presenting with increasingly recognized non-criteria neurological manifestations.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to provide high-level care for a large number of patients with COVID-19 has affected resourcing for, and limited the routine care of, all other conditions. The impact of this health emergency is particularly relevant in the rare connective tissue diseases (rCTDs) communities, as discussed in this Perspective article by the multi-stakeholder European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ERN ReCONNET). The clinical, organizational and health economic challenges faced by health-care providers, institutions, patients and their families during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak have demonstrated the importance of ensuring continuity of care in the management of rCTDs, including adequate diagnostics and monitoring protocols, and highlighted the need for a structured emergency strategy. The vulnerability of patients with rCTDs needs to be taken into account when planning future health policies, in preparation for not only the post-COVID era, but also any possible new health emergencies.

Background: Although targeted biological treatments have transformed the outlook for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 40% of patients show poor clinical response, which is mechanistically still unexplained. Because more than 50% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis have low or absent CD20 B cells-the target for rituximab-in the main disease tissue (joint synovium), we hypothesised that, in these patients, the IL-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab would be more effective. The aim of this trial was to compare the effect of tocilizumab with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) stratified for synovial B-cell status., Methods: This study was a 48-week, biopsy-driven, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 randomised controlled trial (rituximab vs tocilizumab in anti-TNF inadequate responder patients with rheumatoid arthritis; R4RA) done in 19 centres across five European countries (the UK, Belgium, Italy, Portugal, and Spain). Patients aged 18 years or older who fulfilled the 2010 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and were eligible for treatment with rituximab therapy according to UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines were eligible for inclusion in the trial. To inform balanced stratification, following a baseline synovial biopsy, patients were classified histologically as B-cell poor or rich. Patients were then randomly assigned (1:1) centrally in block sizes of six and four to receive two 1000 mg rituximab infusions at an interval of 2 weeks (rituximab group) or 8 mg/kg tocilizumab infusions at 4-week intervals (tocilizumab group). To enhance the accuracy of the stratification of B-cell poor and B-cell rich patients, baseline synovial biopsies from all participants were subjected to RNA sequencing and reclassified by B-cell molecular signature. The study was powered to test the superiority of tocilizumab over rituximab in the B-cell poor population at 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was defined as a 50% improvement in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI50%) from baseline. The trial is registered on the ISRCTN database, ISRCTN97443826, and EudraCT, 2012-002535-28., Findings: Between Feb 28, 2013, and Jan 17, 2019, 164 patients were classified histologically and were randomly assigned to the rituximab group (83 [51%]) or the tocilizumab group (81 [49%]). In patients histologically classified as B-cell poor, there was no statistically significant difference in CDAI50% between the rituximab group (17 [45%] of 38 patients) and the tocilizumab group (23 [56%] of 41 patients; difference 11% [95% CI -11 to 33], p=0·31). However, in the synovial biopsies classified as B-cell poor with RNA sequencing the tocilizumab group had a significantly higher response rate compared with the rituximab group for CDAI50% (rituximab group 12 [36%] of 33 patients vs tocilizumab group 20 [63%] of 32 patients; difference 26% [2 to 50], p=0·035). Occurrence of adverse events (rituximab group 76 [70%] of 108 patients vs tocilizumab group 94 [80%] of 117 patients; difference 10% [-1 to 21) and serious adverse events (rituximab group 8 [7%] of 108 vs tocilizumab group 12 [10%] of 117; difference 3% [-5 to 10]) were not significantly different between treatment groups., Interpretation: The results suggest that RNA sequencing-based stratification of rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue showed stronger associations with clinical responses compared with histopathological classification. Additionally, for patients with low or absent B-cell lineage expression signature in synovial tissue tocilizumab is more effective than rituximab. Replication of the results and validation of the RNA sequencing-based classification in independent cohorts is required before making treatment recommendations for clinical practice., Funding: Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme from the UK National Institute for Health Research., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To study the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and sampling variation of ultrasound (US)-guided synovial biopsies performed in clinical practice and research., Methods: We included all patients who had a US-guided synovial needle biopsy from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients were evaluated for procedure safety and tolerability. Usefulness of synovial biopsy was considered based on contribution for achieving the proposed aims. We analyzed samples for presence and quality of synovial tissue, synovitis score/grade, and pathotype. Variation across patients, samples, section levels, and sampling order was assessed., Results: A total of 64 US-guided synovial biopsies were performed (n = 52 in clinical practice, n = 12 in research). Patient tolerability (70% no/mild discomfort) was remarkably high. There was no significant aggravation of symptoms or US synovitis in the biopsied joint. Procedures were overall safe, with few minor, 2 moderate, and no major adverse events. Usefulness of US-guided synovial biopsies was high, both in clinical practice (37% direct diagnostic impact, 100% positive/95% negative predictive values for infection) and in research (92% success). Synovial tissue was retrieved in 88% of biopsies, with a median of 75% gradable samples. There was significant variation in sample quality and synovitis features across patients and samples, but not between different section levels. Samples collected later in the procedure had a lower frequency of synovial tissue and were poorly concordant in pathotype with those collected earlier., Conclusion: US-guided synovial needle biopsy is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated means to collect good quality synovial tissue for clinical and research purposes. Samples collected for different aims should be retrieved in parallel, rather than sequentially., (© 2019, American College of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: To describe our experience with a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak within a large rheumatology department early in the pandemic. Methods: Symptomatic and asymptomatic healthcare workers (HCWs) had a naso-oropharyngeal swab for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and were followed clinically. Reverse transcription polymerase-chain reaction (RT-PCR) was repeated to document cure, and serological response was assessed. Patients with risk contacts within the department in the 14 days preceding the outbreak were screened for COVID-19 symptoms. Results: 14/34 HCWs (41%; 40 ± 14 years, 71% female) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and 11/34 (32%) developed symptoms but were RT-PCR-negative. Half of RT-PCR-positive HCWs did not report fever, cough, or dyspnea before testing, which were absent in 3/14 cases (21%). Mild disease prevailed (79%), but 3 HCWs had moderate disease requiring further assessment, which excluded severe complications. Nevertheless, symptom duration (28 ± 18 days), viral shedding (31 ± 10 days post-symptom onset, range 15-51), and work absence (29 ± 28 days) were prolonged. 13/14 (93%) of RT-PCR-positive and none of the RT-PCR-negative HCWs had a positive humoral response Higher IgG indexes were observed in individuals over 50 years of age (14.5 ± 7.7 vs. 5.0 ± 4.4, p = 0.012). Of 617 rheumatic patients, 8 (1.3%) developed COVID-19 symptoms (1/8 hospitalization, 8/8 complete recovery), following a consultation/procedure with an asymptomatic (7/8) or mildly symptomatic (1/8) HCW. Conclusions: A COVID-19 outbreak can occur among HCWs and rheumatic patients, swiftly spreading over the presymptomatic stage. Mild disease without typical symptoms should be recognized and may evolve with delayed viral shedding, prolonged recovery, and adequate immune response in most individuals., (Copyright © 2020 Romão, Oliveira-Ramos, Cruz-Machado, Martins, Barreira, Silva-Dinis, Mendonça-Galaio, Proença, Cristino, Sacadura-Leite, Khmelinskii, Romeu, Fonseca and the CHULN Rheumatology Department.)

Background: We previously demonstrated that celastrol has significant anti-inflammatory and bone protective effects when administered via the intraperitoneal route. For further preclinical evaluation, an effective oral administration of celastrol is crucial. Here we aimed to study the therapeutic dose range for its oral administration. Methods: Celastrol (1-25 μg/g/day, N = 5/group) was administrated orally to female adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) rats after 8 days of disease induction for a period of 14 days. A group of healthy ( N = 8) and arthritic ( N = 15) gender- and age-matched Wistar rats was used as controls. During the treatment period, the inflammatory score, ankle perimeter, and body weight were measured. At the end of the treatment, the animals were sacrificed, blood was collected for clinical pathology, necropsy was performed with collection of internal organs for histopathological analysis, and paw samples were used for disease scoring. Results: Doses higher than 2.5 μg/g/day of celastrol reduced the inflammatory score and ankle swelling, preserved joint structure, halted bone destruction, and diminished the number of synovial CD68+ macrophages. Bone resorption and turnover were also reduced at 5 and 7.5 μg/g/day doses. However, the dose of 7.5 μg/g/day was associated with thymic and liver lesions, and higher doses showed severe toxicity. Conclusion: Oral administration of celastrol above 2.5 μg/g/day ameliorates arthritis. This data supports and gives relevant information for the development of a preclinical test of celastrol in the setting of a chronic model of arthritis since rheumatoid arthritis is a long-term disease., (Copyright © 2020 Cascão, Vidal, Carvalho, Lopes, Romão, Goncalves, Moita and Fonseca.)

Background: Clinical outcomes in elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA), starting after the age of 60, are conflicting. Thus, we aimed to investigate in a unique biopsy-driven, treatment-naïve early arthritis cohort, the relationship between synovial pathobiology of elderly- (EORA) and younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA) patients through clinical, imaging and treatment response outcome-measures., Methods: Patients (n = 140) with early RA (<12months) starting before (YORA, n = 99) or after (EORA, n = 41) age 60 had an ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy prior to conventional immunosuppressive therapy and after 6 months. Clinical, ultrasound and radiographic data were collected prospectively and compared between groups and against immunohistological features. Using multivariate logistic regression, we determined predictors of clinical response (disease activity score-28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR]<3.2) at 6 months and radiographic progression (≥1-unit-increase in Sharp van der Heijde [SvdH] score) at 12 months., Results: EORA patients were more frequently male and presented most commonly with an abrupt, polymyalgia rheumatica-like onset and extra-articular features. Both before and after treatment, DAS28-ESR was similar but ultrasound synovial-thickening (p<0.05) and power-Doppler (p<0.01) synovitis and SvdH (p<0.001) scores were higher in EORA patients. EORA was independently associated with poor treatment response at 6 months (OR=0.28, p = 0.047) and radiographic progression at 12 months (OR=4.08, p = 0.029). Synovial pathotype, synovitis scores and cellular infiltration were similar before treatment, but a pauci-immune-fibroid pathotype tended to be more common in YORA at 6 months (p = 0.093). Moreover, YORA patients had a marked improvement of all synovitis parameters (p<0.001), whereas EORA presented only mild decreases in synovitis (p<0.05), sublining macrophage (p<0.05) and T cell scores (p<0.05), with no significant changes in lining macrophages, B cells or plasma cells., Conclusion: Early EORA presents differently and has a worse overall prognosis than YORA, with poorer clinical, histological, ultrasonographic and radiographic outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest VCR reports personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer and Janssen; non-financial support from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Lilly and Roche, outside the submitted work. SK reports personal fees from UCB Pharma, Janssen and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. VRR reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. DvdH reports personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda and UCB, outside the submitted work; and is Director of Imaging Rheumatology bv. JEF reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, UCB Pharma, Janssen, Novartis and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. CP reports grants and personal fees from Abbott / AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca / MedImmune, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen / Johnson & Johnson, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pfizer, Roche / Genentech / Chugai and UCB Pharma, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has come with many challenges for healthcare providers and patients alike. In addition to the direct burden it has placed on societies and health systems, it had a significant impact in the care of patients with chronic diseases, as healthcare resources were deployed to fight the crisis, and major travel and social restrictions were adopted. In the field of rheumatology, this has required notable efforts from departments and clinicians to adapt to the novel status quo and assure the follow-up of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. In the present viewpoint, we provide a practical approach to tackle this reality. Key measures include setting up preventive team management strategies, optimising communication with patients and reorganising patient care in all its dimensions. We then anticipate the nuances of rheumatology practice as restrictive measures are progressively lifted, while an effective vaccine is still pending. This includes the need to reimpose the same strategy as further waves unfold. Finally, we look ahead and address the lessons we can incorporate into post-COVID-19 rheumatology., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The information associated with loss to follow-up (LFU) patients may affect real-world data evaluation of the use of biologics that is not being adequately captured in registries., Methods: We identified all patients (Pts) treated with biologics in our center who had no visits registered for more than 6 months, in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register, Reuma.pt. We retrieved baseline information from Reuma.pt and from the hospital electronic clinical record. We then performed a telephonic interview to characterize the reasons for LFU at our day care unit. For Pts unable to be contacted by telephone a letter of invitation to an appointment at the hospital was sent., Results: From a total of 794 Pts registered in Reuma.pt at our center with active biologic therapy 227 did not have any information registered in the last 6 months. Of this, 36 Pts were on biologic therapy prescribed by other departments and maintained follow-up in these departments. 102 Pts had suspended biologic administration by medical indication and this information was registered in the hospital electronic clinical records but not updated in Reuma.pt. For 89 Pts no information could be retrieved from either the hospital electronic clinical record or Reuma.pt and we classified these Pts as true LFU. 26 of these LFU Pts were being followed up in another Rheumatology center. 26 of the LFU Pts died. 11 Pts had an adverse effect. 4 Pts of the LFU were considering to be in remission. We were not able to contact 15 of the LFU pts., Conclusion: Identifying LFU Pts and clarifying the reason for the loss of data in a register contributes to a better knowledge on strategies to discontinue biologics in stable pts, to a better pharmacovigilance of adverse effects and to more efficiency in data capture by registries. Due to data protection reasons it was impossible to have access to the Pts's death certificates.

Objective: The objective of this paper is to assess overactive bladder (OAB) symptom bother (SB) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS)., Methods: We recruited adult SLE and pSS patients and two groups of age- and sex-matched controls. We applied the OAB questionnaire-short form (OABq-SF) to all participants to assess SB and HRQL and collected clinical information relevant for OAB. We compared the OABq-SF scores for SB and HRQL between patients and controls using univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis., Results: We recruited 95 rheumatic patients (68 SLE, 27 pSS) and 231 controls. Compared to controls SLE patients showed higher OABq-SF SB scores (22.6 ± 20.4 vs 14.7 ± 17.0, p = 0.004) and lower HRQL scores (89.8 ± 15.8 vs 93.8 ± 11.4, p = 0.044). On multivariate analysis SLE was significantly associated with a higher SB score (ß-coefficient 7.13, p = 0.008) and tended to be associated with worse HRQL values (ß-coefficient -3.53, p = 0.055). Patients with pSS had numerically higher mean SB scores (22.8 ± 22.5 vs 16.2 ± 18.0, respectively, p = 0.107) and lower HRQL scores (91.0 ± 10.7 vs 93.2 ± 11.6, respectively, p = 0.369), although these differences were not statistically significant. Diagnosis of pSS was not significantly associated with SB or HRQL scores on univariate or multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Patients with SLE have significantly worse OAB-SB and poorer HRQL compared to controls. A similar trend was seen for pSS patients, especially for SB. These findings suggest that clinically subtle OAB symptoms may be present in rheumatic patients for whom, later on, bladder pain syndrome may occur.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the spelling of the ninth author's name.

Background: The aim of this global collaboration was to develop a consensual set of items for the analysis of synovial biopsies in clinical practice and translational research through the EULAR Synovitis Study Group (ESSG) and OMERACT Synovial Tissue Biopsy Group., Methods: Participants were consulted through a modified Delphi method. Three sequential rounds occurred over 12 months. Members were sent a written questionnaire containing items divided into two parts. Items were identified and formulated based on a scoping review. The first part of the questionnaire referred to synovial biopsies in clinical practice including five subsections, and the second part to translational research with six subsections. Every participant was asked to score each item on a 5-point Likert scale. Items with a median score above 3.5 and a ≥ 70% agreement were selected for the next round. The last round was conducted orally at EULAR in June 2017., Results: Twenty-seven participants from 19 centers were contacted by email. Twenty participants from 17 centers answered. Response rates for next rounds were 100%. For the first part relating to clinical practice, 20/44 items (45.5%) were selected. For the second part relating to translational research, 18/43 items (41.9%) were selected for the final set., Conclusions: We herein propose a consensual set of analysis items to be used for synovial biopsies conducted in clinical practice and translational research.