Search

Eighty-five youths with T1D and 176 controls aged 8–19 years were asked to complete online questionnaires (ChEAT and EAT-26) measuring disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) during (baseline) and after (8-month follow-up) the lockdown. DEB symptoms in all participants (especially younger than 13 years), glycemic control, and zBMI were found unchanged from baseline to follow-up (all p > .05). After 8 months, the ChEAT/EAT-26 critical score frequency decreased significantly in controls (p = .004), as was the score for the ChEAT/EAT-26’s Oral Control subscale in both groups (T1D: p = .005; controls: p = .01). Participants with T1D, especially those older than 13 years, had higher ChEAT/EAT-26 Dieting scores (p = .037) and lower ChEAT/EAT-26 Oral Control scores (p = .046) than controls. Unchanged DEB symptoms suggest that the COVID-19 restrictions did not significantly affect participants’ eating behaviors and that a general adaptation to the challenges of lockdown and other pandemic containment measures occurred in both T1D and control participants.

Wolfram Syndrome (WS) is a very rare genetic disorder characterized by several symptoms that occur from childhood to adulthood. Usually, the first clinical sign is non-autoimmune diabetes even if other clinical features (optic subatrophy, neurosensorial deafness, diabetes insipidus) may be present in an early state and may be diagnosed after diabetes’ onset. Prognosis is poor, and the death occurs at the median age of 39 years as a consequence of progressive respiratory impairment, secondary to brain atrophy and neurological failure. The aim of this paper is the description of the metabolic treatment of the WS. We reported the experience of long treatment in patients with this syndrome diagnosed in pediatric age and followed also in adult age. It is known that there is a correlation between metabolic control of diabetes, the onset of other associated symptoms, and the progression of the neurodegenerative alterations. Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary in order to prevent, treat and carefully monitor all the comorbidities that may occur. An extensive understanding of WS from pathophysiology to novel possible therapy is fundamental and further studies are needed to better manage this devastating disease and to guarantee to patients a better quality of life and a longer life expectancy.

Background Recent research indicates that patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are at higher risk for disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) than their peers without diabetes. The present study aimed to explore the prevalence of DEBs in a sample of Italian children and adolescents with T1D and in matched-pair healthy controls during the COVID-19 lockdown. Methods In a cross-sectional study, 138 children and adolescents with T1D (aged 8.01–19.11 years, 65 boys) attending a Southern Italian diabetic service and 276 age- and gender-matched healthy peers voluntarily completed an online survey about eating behaviors (ChEAT and EAT-26), anthropometric characteristics, and clinical characteristics. Results 8.69% (N = 12) of participants with T1D and 13.4% (N = 37) of controls had ChEAT/EAT-26 scores indicating presence of DEBs, with no differences between patients—whether children (total ChEAT score F(1, 157) = .104, p = .748) or adolescents (total EAT-26 score F(1, 255) = .135, p = .731)—and healthy peers. zBMI values were lower than those measured in the latest diabetes visit (p p = .110). In both groups, adolescents had lower Oral Control scores than children (T1D: F(1, 138) = 20.411, p 2 = .132, controls: F(1, 276) = 18.271, p 2 = .063); additionally, gender (female) and age were found to be significant predictors of several ChEAT/EAT-26 scores. Conclusions This exploratory study suggested that children and adolescents with T1D did not experience more DEB symptoms during the COVID-19 lockdown compared to healthy controls. Results revealed DEBs as more of a female adolescent developmental issue rather than a result of the challenges of living with a chronic illness under quarantine measures. Possible effects of parental pressure on their children’s eating behaviors in the context of home confinement and of using a non-diabetes-specific measure to assess DEBs are discussed.

In the published article, there was an error in affiliation(s) 29. Instead of “Departement of Pediatrics, Diabetes Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milano, Italy”, it should be “Diabetes Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy”. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Objectives Hybrid closed loop systems (HCL) improve the management of type 1 diabetes (T1DM). T1DM adolescent patients represent a risk category also if they are in an automated insulin infusion delivery therapy. Case presentation We describe a series of four cases in which adolescent patients have adopted incorrect behaviours in the managing of HCL systems, challenging the algorithm skills. Two patients performed fabricated sensor calibrations. The other two did not perform pre-prandial insulin boluses correctly. Despite these behaviours, the algorithm corrected the glucose values in three out of four patients. Only in one case, where fabricated calibrations were too frequent, the automatic system failed to restore the glycemic balance. Conclusions Fabricated calibrations seem to be more important than uncorrected insulin boluses to challenge the HCL systems.

Background: When very low doses of insulin are used insulin dilution, a procedure prone to errors, is recommended.Case presentation: We managed a neonate with pancreas agenesis with insulin pump therapy from the first days of life to 16 months of age without insulin dilution. Predictive low glucose suspend mode first and then closed loop control were used. No episodes of severe hypoglycemia were observed. Conclusions: Though limited to a single patient with pancreas agenesis we believe that the use of pump should be warranted in patients with permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus and intestinal malabsorp-tion, even with undiluted insulin.(c) 2022 Diabetes India. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background and Aims Pizza is considered a "junk food", because of high content of fat and carbohydrates. The glycaemic response to pizza could change according to the fermentation of the dough. Dual-wave bolus is usually used to manage pizza meal. Aim of our study was to evaluate glycemic response in a pediatric population with T1DM, after consumption of pizzas made with two different kinds of fermentation but the same Italian recipe,with a simple wave bolus. Method We enrolled 18 patients with T1DM on CSSI to evaluate their glycaemic response to the short and the long fermented pizza (less than 8 hours or more than 24 hours). Results We observed that glucose values were between 70 and 180 mg/dl for a good percentage of time in both types of pizza during all the periods of observation. For male patients the mean percentage of time between 70-180 mg/dl, for 2 hours after bolus, was 71% for the first pizza and 95% for the second (p=0·044). Considering the same time window, there was a significant difference as far as percentage of time is concerned for patients with metabolic compensation ”not in target” with SG

Background: Glycemia following pizza consumption is typically managed with a dual-wave insulin bolus. This study evaluated the effect of a simple bolus on glycemia following consumption of traditionally prepared pizzas with long (24 h) or short (8 h) dough fermentation periods. Research Design and Methods: On two separate evenings, children with type 1 diabetes (n = 38) receiving sensor-integrated pump therapy consumed traditionally prepared pizza with either short (pizza A) or long (pizza B) dough fermentation, and blood glucose was monitored over 11 h. A simple insulin bolus was administered 15 min preprandially. The carbohydrate and amino acid contents of the two types of pizza were analyzed by liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). Results: The mean (±standard deviation) time in range 3.9-10.0 mmol/L was 73.2% ± 23.2%, and 50.8% ± 26.7% of glucose measurements were within the range 3.9-7.8 mmol/L. However, during the 2 h after bolus administration, the mean time in range 3.9-7.8 mmol/L was significantly greater with pizza B than with pizza A (73.3% ± 31.5% vs. 51.8% ± 37.4%, respectively, P = 0.009), and the time in hyperglycemia (>10 mmol/L) was significantly shorter (mean percentage 6.1% ± 19.0% vs. 17.7% ± 29.8%, respectively, P = 0.019). LC-HRMS analysis showed that long fermentation was associated with a lower carbohydrate content in the pizza, and a higher amino acid content. Conclusions: Glycemia following consumption of traditionally prepared pizza can be managed using a simple bolus 15 min before eating. Glycemic control can be further improved by increasing the dough fermentation time. Study registration: NCT03748251, Clinicaltrials.gov.

Background: Recent research indicates that patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are at higher risk for disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) than their peers without diabetes. The present study aimed at examining the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on DEBs in a sample of Italian children and adolescents with T1D and in matched-pair healthy controls.Methods: 138 children and adolescents with T1D (aged 8.01-19.11 years, 65 boys) attending a Southern Italian diabetic service and 276 age- and gender-matched healthy peers voluntarily completed a cross-sectional online survey of eating behaviors (ChEAT and Eat-26), anthropometric characteristics, and clinical characteristics. Results: 8.69% (N=12) of participants with T1D and 13.4% (N=37) of controls had ChEAT/EAT-26 scores indicating presence of DEBs, with no differences between patients—whether children (total ChEAT score F(1, 157)=.104, p=.748) or adolescents (total EAT-26 score F(1, 255)=.135, p=.731)—and healthy peers. zBMI values were lower than those measured in the latest diabetes visit (pp=.110). In both groups, adolescents had lower Oral Control scores than children (T1D: F(1, 138)= 20.411, p2 =.132, controls: F(1, 276)=18.271, p2 =.063); additionally, gender (female) and age were found to be significant predictors of several ChEAT/EAT-26 scores.Discussion: Psychological conditions in relation to DEB symptoms of children and adolescents with T1D were not aggravated by lockdown conditions. Results indicated DEBs as more of a female adolescent developmental issue rather than as a result of the challenges of living with a chronic illness aggravated by outbreak. Possible effects of parental pressure on their children’s eating behaviors in the context of home confinement and of using a non-diabetes-specific measure to assess DEBs are discussed.

Choosing the right infusion set site can be an important factor in obtaining good glycemic control, especially in very young children. In an attempt to identify the best infusion site, we performed a crossover study in six preschool children with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump therapy.We enrolled six patients 5.2±0.7 years old (range, 4-6 years), with type 1 diabetes for more than 1.5 years, using insulin pump therapy for at least 6 months. For each patient, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin, and all data downloaded from the system were evaluated on two occasions: the first with the infusion set placed on the buttock and the second on the abdomen, each for 3 days. The order of infusion set placement was randomized. Mean capillary blood glucose, mean continuous glycemia, mean area under the curve (AUC) using the trapezoidal rule for both140 mg/dL and70 mg/dL, insulin daily dose, carbohydrate/insulin ratio, total basal insulin, total bolus insulin, and mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE) were evaluated.Mean glycemic values, mean AUC140 mg/dL, and MAGE were significantly lower when the infusion set was placed on the buttock versus the abdomen (144.6±31.9 mg/dL vs. 166.0±34.8 mg/dL [P=0.000], 28.4±18.3% vs. 48.8±28.2% [P=0.000], and 32±10 vs. 60±15 mg/dL [P0.001], respectively), whereas mean AUC70 mg/dL was higher (1.47±2.77% vs. 0.87±1.03% [P0.001]).The present findings suggest that preschool children with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump therapy could benefit from inserting the infusion set in the buttock instead of the abdomen.