34 results on '"Roger Sayre"'
Search Results
2. Human populations in the world's mountains: Spatio-temporal patterns and potential controls.
- Author
-
James M Thornton, Mark A Snethlage, Roger Sayre, Davnah R Urbach, Daniel Viviroli, Daniele Ehrlich, Veruska Muccione, Philippus Wester, Gregory Insarov, and Carolina Adler
- Subjects
Medicine ,Science - Abstract
Changing climate and human demographics in the world's mountains will have increasingly profound environmental and societal consequences across all elevations. Quantifying current human populations in and near mountains is crucial to ensure that any interventions in these complex social-ecological systems are appropriately resourced, and that valuable ecosystems are effectively protected. However, comprehensive and reproducible analyses on this subject are lacking. Here, we develop and implement an open workflow to quantify the sensitivity of mountain population estimates over recent decades, both globally and for several sets of relevant reporting regions, to alternative input dataset combinations. Relationships between mean population density and several potential environmental covariates are also explored across elevational bands within individual mountain regions (i.e. "sub-mountain range scale"). Globally, mountain population estimates vary greatly-from 0.344 billion (31%) in 2015. A more detailed analysis using one of the population datasets (GHS-POP) revealed that in ∼35% of mountain sub-regions, population increased at least twofold over the 40-year period 1975-2015. The urban proportion of the total mountain population in 2015 ranged from 6% to 39%, depending on the combination of population and urban extent datasets used. At sub-mountain range scale, population density was found to be more strongly associated with climatic than with topographic and protected-area variables, and these relationships appear to have strengthened slightly over time. Such insights may contribute to improved predictions of future mountain population distributions under scenarios of future climatic and demographic change. Overall, our work emphasizes that irrespective of data choices, substantial human populations are likely to be directly affected by-and themselves affect-mountainous environmental and ecological change. It thereby further underlines the urgency with which the multitudinous challenges concerning the interactions between mountain climate and human societies under change must be tackled.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. An assessment of the representation of ecosystems in global protected areas using new maps of World Climate Regions and World Ecosystems
- Author
-
Roger Sayre, Deniz Karagulle, Charlie Frye, Timothy Boucher, Nicholas H. Wolff, Sean Breyer, Dawn Wright, Madeline Martin, Kevin Butler, Keith Van Graafeiland, Jerry Touval, Leonardo Sotomayor, Jennifer McGowan, Edward T. Game, and Hugh Possingham
- Subjects
Ecology ,QH540-549.5 - Abstract
Representation of ecosystems in protected area networks and conservation strategies is a core principle of global conservation priority setting approaches and a commitment in Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity. The 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) explicitly call for the conservation of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. Accurate ecosystem distribution maps are required to assess representation of ecosystems in protected areas, but standardized, high spatial resolution, and globally comprehensive ecosystem maps have heretofore been lacking. While macroscale global ecoregions maps have been used in global conservation priority setting exercises, they do not identify distinct localized ecosystems at the occurrence (patch) level, and instead describe large ecologically meaningful areas within which additional conservation planning and management are necessary. We describe a new set of maps of globally consistent climate regions and ecosystems at a much finer spatial resolution (250 m) than existing ecological regionalizations. We then describe a global gap analysis of the representation of these ecosystems in protected areas. The new map of terrestrial World Ecosystems was derived from the objective development and integration of 1) global temperature domains, 2) global moisture domains, 3) global landforms, and 4) 2015 global vegetation and land use. These new terrestrial World Ecosystems do not include either freshwater or marine ecosystems, but analog products for the freshwater and marine domains are in development. A total of 431 World Ecosystems were identified, and of these a total of 278 units were natural or semi-natural vegetation/environment combinations, including different kinds of forestlands, shrublands, grasslands, bare areas, and ice/snow regions. The remaining classes were different kinds of croplands and settlements. Of the 278 natural and semi-natural classes, 9 were not represented in global protected areas with a strict biodiversity conservation management objective (IUCN management categories I-IV), and an additional 206 were less than 8.5% protected (half way to the 17% Aichi Target 11 goal). Forty four classes were between 8.5% and 17% protected (more than half way towards the Aichi 17% target), and only 19 classes exceeded the 17% Aichi target. However, when all protected areas (IUCN management categories I-VI plus protected areas with no IUCN designation) were included in a separate global gap analysis, representation of ecosystems increases substantially, with a third of the ecosystems exceeding the 17% Aichi target, and another third between 8.5% and 17%. The overall protection (representation) of global ecosystems in protected areas is considerably less when assessed using only strictly conserved protected areas, and more if all protected areas are included in the analysis. Protected area effectiveness should be included in further evaluations of global ecosystem protection. The ecosystems with the highest representation in protected areas were often bare or sparsely vegetated and found in inhospitable environments (e.g. cold mountains, deserts), and the eight most protected ecosystems were all snow and ice ecosystems. In addition to the global gap analysis of World Ecosystems in protected areas, we report on the representation results for the ecosystems in each biogeographic realm (Neotropical, Nearctic, Afrotropical, Palearctic, Indomalayan, Australasian, and Oceania).
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. A New High-Resolution Map of World Mountains and an Online Tool for Visualizing and Comparing Characterizations of Global Mountain Distributions
- Author
-
Roger Sayre, Charlie Frye, Deniz Karagulle, Jürg Krauer, Sean Breyer, Peter Aniello, Dawn J. Wright, Davnah Payne, Carolina Adler, Harumi Warner, D. Paco VanSistine, and Jill Cress
- Subjects
global mountains ,mountain ecosystems ,digital elevation model ,terrain analysis ,landforms ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 - Abstract
Answers to the seemingly straightforward questions “what is a mountain?” and “where are the mountains of the world?” are in fact quite complex, and there have been few attempts to map the mountains of the earth in a consistent and rigorous fashion. However, knowing exactly where mountain ecosystems are distributed on the planet is a precursor to conserving them, as called for in Sustainable Development Goals 6 and 15 of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In this article we first compare 3 characterizations of global mountain distributions, including a new, high-resolution (250 m) map of global mountains derived from terrain characteristics. We show how differences in conceptual definition, methodology, and spatial resolution of source data can result in differences in the extent and location of lands classed as mountains. For example, the new 250-m resource documents a larger global mountain extent than previous characterizations, although it excludes plateaus, hilly forelands, and other landforms that are often considered part of mountain areas. We then introduce the Global Mountain Explorer, a new web-based application specifically developed for exploration, visualization, and comparison of these maps. This new open-access tool is an intuitive and versatile resource suitable for a broad range of users and applications.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Monitoring Mountains in a Changing World: New Horizons for the Global Network for Observations and Information on Mountain Environments (GEO-GNOME)
- Author
-
Carolina Adler, Elisa Palazzi, Aino Kulonen, Jörg Balsiger, Guido Colangeli, Douglas Cripe, Nathan Forsythe, Grace Goss-Durant, Yaniss Guigoz, Jürg Krauer, Davnah Payne, Nicholas Pepin, Manuel Peralvo, José Romero, Roger Sayre, Maria Shahgedanova, Rolf Weingartner, and Marc Zebisch
- Subjects
Mountain Research Initiative (MRI) ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 - Abstract
Mountains are globally distributed environments that provide significant societal benefits, a function that is increasingly compromised by climatic change, environmental stress, political and socioeconomic transformations, and unsustainable use of natural resources. Gaps in our understanding of these processes and their interactions limit our capacity to inform decisions, where both generalities of mountain regions (eg climate processes) and specificities (eg context-specific manifestations of climate risks) matter. The Global Network for Observations and Information on Mountain Environments (GEO-GNOME), a Group on Earth Observations initiative, aims to fill these gaps through accessible Earth Observation (EO) as well as in-situ data and information on global change drivers, conditions, and trends. A workshop convened by the Mountain Research Initiative (MRI) revised GEO-GNOME's work plan, galvanizing a network that promotes relevant monitoring of global change in mountains and is responsive to the integrated knowledge needs of policy, research, and management.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. A multidisciplinary framework to derive global river reach classifications at high spatial resolution
- Author
-
Camille Ouellet Dallaire, Bernhard Lehner, Roger Sayre, and Michele Thieme
- Subjects
river classification ,global scale ,freshwater management ,sustainability ,river reach type ,Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering ,TD1-1066 ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 ,Science ,Physics ,QC1-999 - Abstract
Projected climate and environmental change are expected to increase the pressure on global freshwater resources. To prepare for and cope with the related risks, stakeholders need to devise plans for sustainable management of river systems, which in turn requires the identification of management-appropriate operational units, such as groups of rivers that share similar environmental and biological characteristics. Ideally, these units are of a manageable size, and are biotically or abiotically distinguishable across a variety of river types. Here, we aim to address this need by presenting a new global river classification framework (GloRiC) to establish a common vocabulary and standardized approach to the development of globally comprehensive and integrated river classifications that can be tailored to different goals and requirements. We define the GloRiC conceptual framework based on five categories of variables: (1) hydrology; (2) physiography and climate; (3) fluvial geomorphology; (4) water chemistry; and (5) aquatic biology. We then apply the framework using hydro-environmental attributes provided by a seamless high-resolution river reach database to create initial instances of three sub-classifications (hydrologic, physio-climatic, and geomorphic) which we ultimately combine into 127 river reach types at the global scale. These supervised classifications utilize a mix of statistical analyses and expert interpretation to identify the classifier variables, the number of classes, and their thresholds. In addition, we also present an unsupervised, multivariable k-means statistical clustering of all river reaches into 30 groups. These first-of-their-kind global river reach classifications at high spatial resolution provide baseline information for a total of 35.9 million kilometers of rivers that have been assessed in this study, and are expected to be particularly useful in remote or data-poor river basins. The GloRiC framework and associated data are primarily designed for broad and rapid applicability in assessments that require stratified analyses of river ecosystem conditions at global and regional scales; smaller-scale applications could follow the same conceptual framework yet use more detailed data sources.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Named Landforms of the World: A Geomorphological and Physiographic Compilation
- Author
-
Charlie Frye, Roger Sayre, Alexander B. Murphy, Deniz Karagülle, Moira Pippi, Mark Gilbert, and Jaynya W. Richards
- Subjects
Geography, Planning and Development ,Earth-Surface Processes - Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Modeling global Hammond landform regions from 250-m elevation data.
- Author
-
Deniz Karagulle, Charlie Frye, Roger Sayre, Sean Breyer, Peter Aniello, Randy Vaughan, and Dawn J. Wright
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Ecological Coastal Units – Standardized Global Shoreline Characteristics
- Author
-
Roger Sayre, Kevin Butler, Keith Van Graafeiland, Sean Breyer, and Dawn Wright
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Human populations in the world's mountains: Spatio-temporal patterns and potential controls
- Author
-
James M, Thornton, Mark A, Snethlage, Roger, Sayre, Davnah R, Urbach, Daniel, Viviroli, Daniele, Ehrlich, Veruska, Muccione, Philippus, Wester, Gregory, Insarov, and Carolina, Adler
- Subjects
Population Density ,Climate Change ,Humans ,Ecosystem - Abstract
Changing climate and human demographics in the world's mountains will have increasingly profound environmental and societal consequences across all elevations. Quantifying current human populations in and near mountains is crucial to ensure that any interventions in these complex social-ecological systems are appropriately resourced, and that valuable ecosystems are effectively protected. However, comprehensive and reproducible analyses on this subject are lacking. Here, we develop and implement an open workflow to quantify the sensitivity of mountain population estimates over recent decades, both globally and for several sets of relevant reporting regions, to alternative input dataset combinations. Relationships between mean population density and several potential environmental covariates are also explored across elevational bands within individual mountain regions (i.e. "sub-mountain range scale"). Globally, mountain population estimates vary greatly-from 0.344 billion (5% of the corresponding global total) to 2.289 billion (31%) in 2015. A more detailed analysis using one of the population datasets (GHS-POP) revealed that in ∼35% of mountain sub-regions, population increased at least twofold over the 40-year period 1975-2015. The urban proportion of the total mountain population in 2015 ranged from 6% to 39%, depending on the combination of population and urban extent datasets used. At sub-mountain range scale, population density was found to be more strongly associated with climatic than with topographic and protected-area variables, and these relationships appear to have strengthened slightly over time. Such insights may contribute to improved predictions of future mountain population distributions under scenarios of future climatic and demographic change. Overall, our work emphasizes that irrespective of data choices, substantial human populations are likely to be directly affected by-and themselves affect-mountainous environmental and ecological change. It thereby further underlines the urgency with which the multitudinous challenges concerning the interactions between mountain climate and human societies under change must be tackled.
- Published
- 2021
11. Bioregions in Marine Environments: Combining Biological and Environmental Data for Management and Scientific Understanding
- Author
-
Timothy D. O'Hara, Cecilie Hansen, Nicholas J. Bax, Piers K. Dunstan, Jarno Vanhatalo, Jock C. Currie, Scott D. Foster, Daniel C. Dunn, Nicole A. Hill, Otso Ovaskainen, Skipton N. C. Woolley, Roger Sayre, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Research Centre for Ecological Change, Otso Ovaskainen / Principal Investigator, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Environmental and Ecological Statistics Group, and Biostatistics Helsinki
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Matching (statistics) ,BIAS CORRECTION ,Computer science ,Biodiversity ,GENERALIZED LINEAR-MODELS ,PREDICTIONS ,marine biology ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Environmental data ,Biodiversity conservation ,SPECIES DISTRIBUTION ,IMPLEMENTATION ,Spatial representation ,14. Life underwater ,112 Statistics and probability ,1172 Environmental sciences ,biogeography ,Biological data ,ECOREGIONS ,business.industry ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,Environmental resource management ,Statistical model ,POINT PROCESS MODELS ,15. Life on land ,FRAMEWORK ,REGIONS ,Natural resource ,statistics ,13. Climate action ,BIODIVERSITY ,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences ,business ,community ecology - Abstract
Bioregions are important tools for understanding and managing natural resources. Bioregions should describe locations of relatively homogenous assemblages of species occur, enabling managers to better regulate activities that might affect these assemblages. Many existing bioregionalization approaches, which rely on expert-derived, Delphic comparisons or environmental surrogates, do not explicitly include observed biological data in such analyses. We highlight that, for bioregionalizations to be useful and reliable for systems scientists and managers, the bioregionalizations need to be based on biological data; to include an easily understood assessment of uncertainty, preferably in a spatial format matching the bioregions; and to be scientifically transparent and reproducible. Statistical models provide a scientifically robust, transparent, and interpretable approach for ensuring that bioregions are formed on the basis of observed biological and physical data. Using statistically derived bioregions provides a repeatable framework for the spatial representation of biodiversity at multiple spatial scales. This results in better-informed management decisions and biodiversity conservation outcomes.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. A Global Ecological Classification of Coastal Segment Units to Complement Marine Biodiversity Observation Network Assessments
- Author
-
Kevin Butler, Sean Breyer, Jill J. Cress, Frank E. Muller-Karger, Björn Nyberg, Rebecca Allee, Thomas R. Allen, Rost Parsons, Mark J. Costello, Keith Van Graafeiland, Peter T. Harris, Madeline Thomas Martin, Roger Sayre, Charlie Frye, Deniz Karagulle, and Dawn J. Wright
- Subjects
Marine biodiversity ,Geography ,Ecology ,Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450::Naturgeografi: 455 [VDP] ,Oceanography ,Complement (complexity) - Abstract
A new data layer provides Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) labels for global coastal segments at 1 km or shorter resolution. These characteristics are summarized for six US Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) sites and one MBON Pole to Pole of the Americas site in Argentina. The global coastlines CMECS classifications were produced from a partitioning of a 30 m Landsat-derived shoreline vector that was segmented into 4 million 1 km or shorter segments. Each segment was attributed with values from 10 variables that represent the ecological settings in which the coastline occurs, including properties of the adjacent water, adjacent land, and coastline itself. The 4 million segments were classified into 81,000 coastal segment units (CSUs) as unique combinations of variable classes. We summarize the process to develop the CSUs and derive summary descriptions for the seven MBON case study sites. We discuss the intended application of the new CSU data for research and management in coastal areas. publishedVersion
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. World Terrestrial Ecosystems
- Author
-
Jennifer McGowan, Hugh P. Possingham, Deniz Karagulle, Roger Sayre, Charlie Frye, Timothy M. Boucher, Madeline Thomas Martin, Leonardo Sotomayor, Sean Breyer, Nicholas H. Wolff, Jerry Touval, Keith VanGraafeiland, Edward T. Game, Kevin Butler, and Dawn J. Wright
- Subjects
Goods and services ,business.industry ,Environmental resource management ,Sustainability ,Environmental science ,High resolution ,Terrestrial ecosystem ,Ecosystem ,business - Abstract
As the source providing units for several goods and services required for human survival (e.g. food, fuel, fiber, water provision and purification, etc.) ecosystems must be sustainably managed. This will require a globally comprehensive and detailed understanding of the distribution of ecosystems on Earth. While there have been several attempts to partition the planet into large ecologically meaningful areas (ecoregions), a high spatial resolution map of Earth's terrestrial ecosystems at the on-the-ground occurrences (patch) level has heretofore been lacking. A new, high resolution (250 m) map of data-derived World Terrestrial Ecosystems is characterized, and its utility for assessing policy-mandated ecosystem conservation targets is described.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Global Islands
- Author
-
Madeline Martin, Roger Sayre, Keith VanGraafeiland, Osgur McDermott Long, Lauren Weatherdon, David Will, Dena R. Spatz, and Nick D. Holmes
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. A new 30 meter resolution global shoreline vector and associated global islands database for the development of standardized ecological coastal units
- Author
-
Keith Van Graafeiland, Devon Burton, Rost Parsons, Dabney Hopkins, Rebecca Allee, Roger Sayre, Frank E. Muller-Karger, Drew Stephens, Björn Nyberg, Mark J. Costello, Kevin Butler, Peter Aniello, Suzanne M. Noble, Sharon Hamann, Adam Reed, Jac Steiner, Charlie Frye, Beverly A. Friesen, Sean Breyer, Jill J. Cress, Eleonora Manca, Irawan Asaad, Karina Atkins, Peter T. Harris, Thomas R. Allen, D. Paco Van Sistine, Dawn J. Wright, Zeenatul Basher, Kevin Kelly, Justin Saarinen, Maria T. Kavanaugh, Deniz Karagulle, Rebecca J. Smith, Kathy Goodin, and Helen Lillis
- Subjects
Shore ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,010505 oceanography ,Satellite imagery ,Oceanography ,01 natural sciences ,Image resolution ,Cartography ,Geology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
A new 30-m spatial resolution global shoreline vector (GSV) was developed from annual composites of 2014 Landsat satellite imagery. The semi-automated classification of the imagery was accomplished...
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Stratifying ocean sampling globally and with depth to account for environmental variability
- Author
-
Mark J. Costello, Sean Breyer, Zeenatul Basher, Roger Sayre, and Dawn J. Wright
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Multidisciplinary ,Species distribution ,lcsh:R ,Stratification (water) ,lcsh:Medicine ,Pelagic zone ,Article ,Environmental data ,Stratified sampling ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,Benthic zone ,Environmental science ,Spatial variability ,lcsh:Q ,Physical geography ,Temporal scales ,lcsh:Science - Abstract
With increasing depth, the ocean is less sampled for physical, chemical and biological variables. Using the Global Marine Environmental Datasets (GMED) and Ecological Marine Units (EMUs), we show that spatial variation in environmental variables decreases with depth. This is also the case over temporal scales because seasonal change, surface weather conditions, and biological activity are highest in shallow depths. A stratified sampling approach to ocean sampling is therefore proposed whereby deeper environments, both pelagic and benthic, would be sampled with relatively lower spatial and temporal resolutions. Sampling should combine measurements of physical and chemical parameters with biological species distributions, even though species identification is difficult to automate. Species distribution data are essential to infer ecosystem structure and function from environmental data. We conclude that a globally comprehensive, stratification-based ocean sampling program would be both scientifically justifiable and cost-effective.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Modeling global Hammond landform regions from 250-m elevation data
- Author
-
Peter Aniello, Roger Sayre, Dawn J. Wright, Sean Breyer, Randy Vaughan, Deniz Karagulle, and Charlie Frye
- Subjects
geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Landform ,05 social sciences ,Improved algorithm ,0507 social and economic geography ,01 natural sciences ,Elevation data ,Geological survey ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,050703 geography ,Cartography ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
In 1964, E.H. Hammond proposed criteria for classifying and mapping physiographic regions of the United States. Hammond produced a map entitled “Classes of Land Surface Form in the Forty-Eight States, USA”, which is regarded as a pioneering and rigorous treatment of regional physiography. Several researchers automated Hammond?s model in GIS. However, these were local or regional in application, and resulted in inadequate characterization of tablelands. We used a global 250 m DEM to produce a new characterization of global Hammond landform regions. The improved algorithm we developed for the regional landform modeling: (1) incorporated a profile parameter for the delineation of tablelands; (2) accommodated negative elevation data values; (3) allowed neighborhood analysis window (NAW) size to vary between parameters; (4) more accurately bounded plains regions; and (5) mapped landform regions as opposed to discrete landform features. The new global Hammond landform regions product builds on an existing global Hammond landform features product developed by the U.S. Geological Survey, which, while globally comprehensive, did not include tablelands, used a fixed NAW size, and essentially classified pixels rather than regions. Our algorithm also permits the disaggregation of “mixed” Hammond types (e.g. plains with high mountains) into their component parts.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. A Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Ocean Based on Environmental Data
- Author
-
Drew Stephens, Patrick N. Halpin, Roger Sayre, Kathleen L. Goodin, Charles E Frye, Peter T. Harris, Peter Aniello, John M. Guinotte, Kevin Butler, Sean Breyer, Dawn J. Wright, Maria T. Kavanaugh, Zeenatul Basher, Noel A Cressie, Keith Van Graafeiland, Mark E Monaco, and Mark J. Costello
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Oceanography ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,Political science ,Regional science ,Redistribution (cultural anthropology) ,Permission ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Environmental data - Abstract
Author Posting. © The Oceanography Society, 2017. This article is posted here by permission of The Oceanography Society for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Oceanography 30, no. 1 (2017): 90–103, doi:10.5670/oceanog.2017.116.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. An assessment of the representation of ecosystems in global protected areas using new maps of World Climate Regions and World Ecosystems
- Author
-
Jerry Touval, Deniz Karagulle, Leonardo Sotomayor, Kevin Butler, Charlie Frye, Nicholas H. Wolff, Roger Sayre, Timothy M. Boucher, Sean Breyer, Jennifer McGowan, Hugh P. Possingham, Dawn J. Wright, Keith Van Graafeiland, Edward T. Game, and Madeline Thomas Martin
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Convention on Biological Diversity ,Ecology ,Land use ,Global temperature ,business.industry ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,Environmental resource management ,Gap analysis (conservation) ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Geography ,lcsh:QH540-549.5 ,IUCN Red List ,Marine ecosystem ,Ecosystem ,lcsh:Ecology ,Protected area ,business ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Nature and Landscape Conservation - Abstract
Representation of ecosystems in protected area networks and conservation strategies is a core principle of global conservation priority setting approaches and a commitment in Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity. The 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) explicitly call for the conservation of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. Accurate ecosystem distribution maps are required to assess representation of ecosystems in protected areas, but standardized, high spatial resolution, and globally comprehensive ecosystem maps have heretofore been lacking. While macroscale global ecoregions maps have been used in global conservation priority setting exercises, they do not identify distinct localized ecosystems at the occurrence (patch) level, and instead describe large ecologically meaningful areas within which additional conservation planning and management are necessary. We describe a new set of maps of globally consistent climate regions and ecosystems at a much finer spatial resolution (250 m) than existing ecological regionalizations. We then describe a global gap analysis of the representation of these ecosystems in protected areas. The new map of terrestrial World Ecosystems was derived from the objective development and integration of 1) global temperature domains, 2) global moisture domains, 3) global landforms, and 4) 2015 global vegetation and land use. These new terrestrial World Ecosystems do not include either freshwater or marine ecosystems, but analog products for the freshwater and marine domains are in development. A total of 431 World Ecosystems were identified, and of these a total of 278 units were natural or semi-natural vegetation/environment combinations, including different kinds of forestlands, shrublands, grasslands, bare areas, and ice/snow regions. The remaining classes were different kinds of croplands and settlements. Of the 278 natural and semi-natural classes, 9 were not represented in global protected areas with a strict biodiversity conservation management objective (IUCN management categories I-IV), and an additional 206 were less than 8.5% protected (half way to the 17% Aichi Target 11 goal). Forty four classes were between 8.5% and 17% protected (more than half way towards the Aichi 17% target), and only 19 classes exceeded the 17% Aichi target. However, when all protected areas (IUCN management categories I-VI plus protected areas with no IUCN designation) were included in a separate global gap analysis, representation of ecosystems increases substantially, with a third of the ecosystems exceeding the 17% Aichi target, and another third between 8.5% and 17%. The overall protection (representation) of global ecosystems in protected areas is considerably less when assessed using only strictly conserved protected areas, and more if all protected areas are included in the analysis. Protected area effectiveness should be included in further evaluations of global ecosystem protection. The ecosystems with the highest representation in protected areas were often bare or sparsely vegetated and found in inhospitable environments (e.g. cold mountains, deserts), and the eight most protected ecosystems were all snow and ice ecosystems. In addition to the global gap analysis of World Ecosystems in protected areas, we report on the representation results for the ecosystems in each biogeographic realm (Neotropical, Nearctic, Afrotropical, Palearctic, Indomalayan, Australasian, and Oceania).
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Ecological Marine Units as a Framework for Collaborative Data Science and Knowledge Discovery
- Author
-
Dawn Wright, Roger Sayre, Sean Breyer, Kevin Butler, Keith VanGraafeiland, Mark Costello, Kathy Goodin, Maria Kavanaugh, Noel Cressie, Zeenatul Basher, Peter Harris, and John Guinotte
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Monitoring Mountains in a Changing World: New Horizons for the Global Network for Observations and Information on Mountain Environments (GEO-GNOME)
- Author
-
Nathan Forsythe, Guido Colangeli, Rolf Weingartner, Nick Pepin, Roger Sayre, Carolina Adler, Elisa Palazzi, Manuel Peralvo, Yaniss Guigoz, Marc Zebisch, Douglas Cripe, Jürg Krauer, Aino Kulonen, Davnah Payne, Jörg Balsiger, Maria Shahgedanova, Grace Goss-Durant, and José Romero
- Subjects
Earth observation ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Mountain Research Initiative (MRI) ,Climate change ,910 Geography & travel ,580 Plants (Botany) ,010501 environmental sciences ,Development ,01 natural sciences ,Mountains ,Global network ,Environmental Chemistry ,GEO-GNOME ,Mountain ,lcsh:Environmental sciences ,SDGs ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,General Environmental Science ,GEOSS ,lcsh:GE1-350 ,ddc:333.7-333.9 ,Geography ,Mountain research ,business.industry ,Environmental resource management ,Global change ,GEO ,Natural resource ,330 Economics ,Mountain platforms ,business ,EO infrastructures ,Gnome ,Group on Earth Observations - Abstract
Mountain Research and Development, 38 (3), ISSN:0276-4741, ISSN:1994-7151
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. The islands of Oceania – Political geography, biogeography, and terrestrial ecosystems
- Author
-
Charlie Frye, Keith Van Graafeiland, Simone Maynard, Kevin Butler, Roger Sayre, Madeline Thomas Martin, Sean Breyer, Deniz Karagulle, and Dawn J. Wright
- Subjects
Seascape ,Global and Planetary Change ,Ecology ,Political geography ,business.industry ,Biogeography ,Geography, Planning and Development ,Environmental resource management ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,021107 urban & regional planning ,02 engineering and technology ,010501 environmental sciences ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,Service provider ,01 natural sciences ,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) ,Ecosystem services ,Goods and services ,Geography ,Terrestrial ecosystem ,Ecosystem ,business ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Nature and Landscape Conservation - Abstract
Humans are dependent upon ecosystems for the production of goods and services necessary for their well-being (Daily, 1997). As the service provider units (SPUs) for these benefits of nature (Anderson et al., 2015), ecosystems need to be managed in a way that maximizes their persistence on the planet. Part of that management effort includes knowing a) what the ecosystem types are, b) where they are located on the landscape and in the seascape, and c) what condition they are in. Mapping of ecosystem occurrences as the SPUs for ecosystems goods and services is therefore an important element of ecosystem accounting, an inherently spatial activity. Maps are also needed of the ecosystem accounting areas within which the accounting is conducted. Standardized maps of ecosystem accounting areas and terrestrial ecosystem SPUs have not previously been available for many islands of the Oceania region. We describe the availability of new island shorelines and ecosystems data for Oceania herein, and encourage consideration and evaluation of the data for ecosystem accounting and other applications.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. A multidisciplinary framework to derive global river reach classifications at high spatial resolution
- Author
-
Michele Thieme, Roger Sayre, Bernhard Lehner, and Camille Ouellet Dallaire
- Subjects
geography ,River ecosystem ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Aquatic biology ,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment ,business.industry ,Computer science ,Environmental resource management ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Drainage basin ,15. Life on land ,010501 environmental sciences ,01 natural sciences ,6. Clean water ,Conceptual framework ,13. Climate action ,Sustainable management ,Sustainability ,14. Life underwater ,Scale (map) ,business ,Baseline (configuration management) ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,General Environmental Science - Abstract
Projected climate and environmental change are expected to increase the pressure on global freshwater resources. To prepare for and cope with the related risks, stakeholders need to devise plans for sustainable management of river systems, which in turn requires the identification of management-appropriate operational units, such as groups of rivers that share similar environmental and biological characteristics. Ideally, these units are of a manageable size, and are biotically or abiotically distinguishable across a variety of river types. Here, we aim to address this need by presenting a new global river classification framework (GloRiC) to establish a common vocabulary and standardized approach to the development of globally comprehensive and integrated river classifications that can be tailored to different goals and requirements. We define the GloRiC conceptual framework based on five categories of variables: (1) hydrology; (2) physiography and climate; (3) fluvial geomorphology; (4) water chemistry; and (5) aquatic biology. We then apply the framework using hydro-environmental attributes provided by a seamless high-resolution river reach database to create initial instances of three sub-classifications (hydrologic, physio-climatic, and geomorphic) which we ultimately combine into 127 river reach types at the global scale. These supervised classifications utilize a mix of statistical analyses and expert interpretation to identify the classifier variables, the number of classes, and their thresholds. In addition, we also present an unsupervised, multivariable k-means statistical clustering of all river reaches into 30 groups. These first-of-their-kind global river reach classifications at high spatial resolution provide baseline information for a total of 35.9 million kilometers of rivers that have been assessed in this study, and are expected to be particularly useful in remote or data-poor river basins. The GloRiC framework and associated data are primarily designed for broad and rapid applicability in assessments that require stratified analyses of river ecosystem conditions at global and regional scales; smaller-scale applications could follow the same conceptual framework yet use more detailed data sources.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. A high-resolution bioclimate map of the world: a unifying framework for global biodiversity research and monitoring
- Author
-
Roger Sayre, Marc J. Metzger, Rob H. G. Jongman, Antonio Trabucco, Robert G. H. Bunce, and Robert J. Zomer
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Global and Planetary Change ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Ecology ,Climate change ,15. Life on land ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Environmental data ,Multispectral pattern recognition ,Geography ,Cohen's kappa ,13. Climate action ,Principal component analysis ,Cluster analysis ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Geoportal ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Global biodiversity - Abstract
Aim To develop a novel global spatial framework for the integration and analysis of ecological and environmental data. Location The global land surface excluding Antarctica. Methods A broad set of climate-related variables were considered for inclusion in a quantitative model, which partitions geographic space into bioclimate regions. Statistical screening produced a subset of relevant bioclimate variables, which were further compacted into fewer independent dimensions using principal components analysis (PCA). An ISODATA clustering routine was then used to classify the principal components into relatively homogeneous environmental strata. The strata were aggregated into global environmental zones based on the attribute distances between strata to provide structure and support a consistent nomenclature. Results The global environmental stratification (GEnS) consists of 125 strata, which have been aggregated into 18 global environmental zones. The stratification has a 30 arcsec resolution (equivalent to 0.86 km2 at the equator). Aggregations of the strata were compared with nine existing global, continental and national bioclimate and ecosystem classifications using the Kappa statistic. Values range between 0.54 and 0.72, indicating good agreement in bioclimate and ecosystem patterns between existing maps and the GEnS. Main conclusions The GEnS provides a robust spatial analytical framework for the aggregation of local observations, identification of gaps in current monitoring efforts and systematic design of complementary and new monitoring and research. The dataset is available for non-commercial use through the GEO portal (http://www.geoportal.org).
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. A National Geographic Framework for Guiding Conservation on a Landscape Scale
- Author
-
Laura A. Brandt, Roger Sayre, Michael J. Millard, Janith Taylor, John M. Morton, Darin G. Simpkins, David Perkins, Frank S. Shipley, Pamela J. Sponholtz, Jennifer S. Briggs, and Craig A. Czarnecki
- Subjects
Ecology ,business.industry ,Environmental resource management ,Wildlife ,Habitat conservation ,Expert elicitation ,Geography ,Habitat ,Effects of global warming ,Geological survey ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Bird conservation ,business ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Nature and Landscape Conservation ,Wildlife conservation - Abstract
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, along with the global conservation community, has recognized that the conservation challenges of the 21st century far exceed the responsibilities and footprint of any individual agency or program. The ecological effects of climate change and other anthropogenic stressors do not recognize geopolitical boundaries and, as such, demand a national geographic framework to provide structure for cross-jurisdictional and landscape-scale conservation strategies. In 2009, a new map of ecologically based conservation regions in which to organize capacity and implement strategic habitat conservation was developed using rapid prototyping and expert elicitation by an interagency team of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Geological Survey scientists and conservation professionals. Incorporating Bird Conservation Regions, Freshwater Ecoregions, and U.S. Geological Survey hydrologic unit codes, the new geographic framework provides a spatial template for building conservat...
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Effects of rainfall acidity and ozone on foliar leaching in red spruce (Picea rubens)
- Author
-
Timothy J. Fahey and Roger Sayre
- Subjects
Canopy ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,Global and Planetary Change ,Ozone ,Ecology ,Base (chemistry) ,Chemistry ,Growing season ,Forestry ,Treatment period ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Horticulture ,Flux (metallurgy) ,Botany ,Acid rain ,Leaching (agriculture) - Abstract
The effects of acid rain and ozone on the leaching of chemicals from the canopy of red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) saplings was measured over a 4-year treatment period. The saplings were exposed to various levels of ozone and to acid rain (pH 3.1, 4.1, and 5.1) using open-top chambers. No effects of ozone treatments on canopy leaching were observed. Significant effects of rainfall pH on canopy leaching of Ca2+ and Mg2+ were observed, and post-hoc analysis indicated that these effects were associated only with the most acidic treatment (pH 3.1). In the low pH treatment (high NO3- and SO42-) significant canopy retention of both NO3- and SO42- were observed. The observed increase in base cation leaching flux from the red spruce canopy in the low pH treatment was particularly prominent early in the growing season (June) probably reflecting incomplete cuticle formation in the young foliage. Although the annual magnitude of extra Ca2+ leaching from the canopy of red spruce trees in the low pH treatment was small relative to the foliar calcium pool (about 10%), if this leaching preferentially depletes a physiologically important pool, it may influence tree health.
- Published
- 1999
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Terrestrial Ecosystems of the Conterminous United States
- Author
-
Roger Sayre, Harumi Warner, Jill J. Cress, and Patrick J. Comer
- Subjects
Earth science ,Terrestrial ecosystem ,Geology - Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Terrestrial Ecosystems - Land Surface Forms of the Conterminous United States
- Author
-
Patrick J. Comer, Roger Sayre, Harumi Warner, and Jill J. Cress
- Subjects
Earth science ,Climatology ,Terrestrial ecosystem ,Geology - Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Terrestrial ecosystems - Isobioclimates of the conterminous United States
- Author
-
Roger Sayre, Harumi Warner, Jill J. Cress, and Patrick J. Comer
- Subjects
Earth science ,Terrestrial ecosystem ,Geology - Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Terrestrial Ecosystems - Topographic Moisture Potential of the Conterminous United States
- Author
-
Harumi Warner, Jill J. Cress, Patrick J. Comer, and Roger Sayre
- Subjects
Moisture ,Climatology ,Terrestrial ecosystem ,Physical geography ,Geology - Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Spatial Variations of Sapwood Chemistry with Soil Acidity in Appalachian Forests
- Author
-
Roger Sayre, William E. Sharpe, Bryan R. Swistock, and David R. DeWalle
- Subjects
Prunus serotina ,Environmental Engineering ,biology ,Chemistry ,Soil chemistry ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,biology.organism_classification ,Pollution ,Fagaceae ,Tsuga ,Soil pH ,Botany ,Soil water ,Dendrochronology ,Waste Management and Disposal ,Chemical composition ,Water Science and Technology - Abstract
(...) Sapwood tree rings generally showed higher concentrations of Mn and lower concentrations of Sr at sites with lower soil pH. Differences in tree-ring concentrations for Ca and Mn among sites were also found in soil water samples at these sites. Significant differences in soil leachate Al between sites were not duplicated in tree rings. Sapwood tree-ring chemistry in red oak (Quercus rubra L.), black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.), eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) and eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis [L.] Carr.) was generally responsive to differences in soil chemistry between sites
- Published
- 1991
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Essential Biodiversity Variables
- Author
-
A C Cardoso, Nicholas C. Coops, Belinda Reyers, Richard D. Gregory, Walter Jetz, Gary N. Geller, Simon Ferrier, Daniel P. Faith, Jörg Freyhof, Martin Wegmann, Yusuke Onoda, Carlo H. R. Heip, Neil Brummitt, Robert Höft, Henrique M. Pereira, Joern P. W. Scharlemann, Robert J. Scholes, George C. Hurtt, E Dulloo, Eren Turak, Matt Walpole, Rob H. G. Jongman, Michele Walters, David Obura, Nathalie Pettorelli, Daniel S. Karp, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Michael William Bruford, Melodie A. McGeoch, Simon N. Stuart, and Roger Sayre
- Subjects
Convention on Biological Diversity ,education.field_of_study ,Multidisciplinary ,business.industry ,Population ,Environmental resource management ,Biodiversity ,system ,Biology ,Biodiversity and Policy ,indicators ,Ecosystem services ,map ,Biodiversiteit en Beleid ,Measurement of biodiversity ,Resource management ,global biodiversity ,education ,business ,Essential Biodiversity Variables ,Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services ,Group on Earth Observations ,Global biodiversity - Abstract
Reducing the rate of biodiversity loss and averting dangerous biodiversity change are international goals, reasserted by the Aichi Targets for 2020 by Parties to the United Nations (UN) Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) after failure to meet the 2010 target (1, 2). However, there is no global, harmonized observation system for delivering regular, timely data on biodiversity change (3). With the first plenary meeting of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) soon under way, partners from the Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) (4) are developing—and seeking consensus around—Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) that could form the basis of monitoring programs worldwide.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. USGS Goals for the Coming Decade
- Author
-
Jill S. Baron, C. van Riper, Roger Sayre, M. D. Myers, S E. Schwarzbach, Martin B. Goldhaber, P. R. Beauchemin, Eugene S. Schweig, J. Thormodsgard, James W. LaBaugh, K. T. Gallagher, W. Wilde, D. R. Hutchinson, and M. A. Ayers
- Subjects
Multidisciplinary ,Geography ,business.industry ,Environmental resource management ,Geological survey ,Soil science ,Modernization theory ,business - Abstract
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) proposes six strategic directions for managing ecosystems along with modernization of observation networks of land, water, and biological resources.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. A new map of standardized terrestrial ecosystems of the conterminous united states
- Author
-
Jill J. Cress, Roger Sayre, Patrick J. Comer, and Harumi Warner
- Subjects
Geospatial analysis ,business.industry ,Ecology ,Biogeography ,Environmental resource management ,Climate change ,Stratification (vegetation) ,computer.software_genre ,Ecosystem services ,Thematic map ,Geography ,Ecosystem ,Terrestrial ecosystem ,business ,computer - Abstract
A new map of standardized, mesoscale (tens to thousands of hectares) terrestrial ecosystems for the conterminous United States was developed by using a biophysical stratification approach. The ecosystems delineated in this top-down, deductive modeling effort are described in NatureServe's classification of terrestrial ecological systems of the United States. The ecosystems were mapped as physically distinct areas and were associated with known distributions of vegetation assemblages by using a standardized methodology first developed for South America. This approach follows the geoecosystems concept of R.J. Huggett and the ecosystem geography approach ofR.G. Bailey. Unique physical environments were delineated through a geospatial combination of national data layers for biogeography, bioclimate, surficial materials lithology, land surface forms, and topographic moisture potential. Combining these layers resulted in a comprehensive biophysical stratification of the conterminous United States, which produced 13,482 unique biophysical areas. These were considered as fundamental units of ecosystem structure and were aggregated into 419 potential terrestrial ecosystems. The ecosystems classification effort preceded the mapping effort and involved the independent development of diagnostic criteria, descriptions, and nomenclature for describing expert-derived ecological systems. The aggregation and labeling of the mapped ecosystem structure units into the ecological systems classification was accomplished in an iterative, expert-knowledge-based process using automated rulesets for identifying ecosystems on the basis of their biophysical and biogeographic attributes. The mapped ecosystems, at a 30-meter base resolution, represent an improvement in spatial and thematic (class) resolution over existing ecoregionalizations and are useful for a variety of applications, including ecosystem services assessments, climate change impact studies, biodiversity conservation, and resource management.
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.