Search

La Clasificación de Chicago v4.0 (CCv4.0) es el esquema actualizado para clasificar las alteraciones de la motilidad esofágica utilizando la métrica de la manometría de alta resolución (HRM). Para desarrollar la CCv4.0, 52 expertos internacionales diversos separados en siete subgrupos de trabajo utilizaron una metodología formalmente validada, en un periodo de dos años. Las actualizaciones claves de la CCv4.0 consisten en un protocolo de HRM más riguroso y expansivo que incorpora las posiciones en decúbito supino y sedestación, así como pruebas provocadoras; una definición refinada de la obstrucción del flujo de salida de la unión esofagogástrica (EGJOO), criterios diagnósticos más estrictos para la motilidad esofágica inefectiva, y descripción de la métrica basal de la EGJ. Adicionalmente, la CCv4.0 se propuso definir el diagnóstico de alteración de la motilidad como conclusivo o no conclusivo con base en los síntomas asociados, los hallazgos en las pruebas provocadoras, y los resultados de los exámenes de apoyo como el esofagograma con tableta de bario y/o la prueba con sonda para imagen endoluminal funcional. Estos cambios buscan minimizar la ambigüedad presente en iteraciones previas de la Clasificación de Chicago; además proveen criterios más estandarizados y rigurosos para los patrones de alteración de la peristalsis y obstrucción de la EGJ.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, medical schools were forced to adapt clinical curricula. The University of Washington School of Medicine created a hybrid in person and virtual general surgery clerkship.The third year general surgery clerkship was modified to a 4-week in person and 2-week virtual clerkship to accommodate the same number of learners in less time. All students completed a survey to assess the impact of the virtual clerkship.The students preferred faculty lectures over national modules in the virtual clerkship. 58.6% indicated they would prefer the virtual component before the in-person experience. There was no change from previous years in final grades or clerkship exam scores after this hybrid curriculum.If the need for a virtual general surgery curriculum arises again in the future, learners value this experience at the beginning of the clerkship and prefer faculty lectures over national modules.

General surgery remains a male-dominated specialty. Women constitute 54% of medical students at the University of Washington, but only 3.4% of full professors within the Department of Surgery. Many believe surgical attrition and "the leaky pipeline" starts during medical school clerkships, but the exact deterrents remain undefined. This study examined the impact of gender on grading during the third-year surgical clerkship.Retrospective analysis of confidential final clerkship grades, examination scores and subjective clerkship grades was conducted. These were compared by gender, time period, and type of clerkship site. Chi-square analyses were performed.Clerkship sites across multiple academic (n = 6) and nonacademic (n = 14) locations.All third-year medical students undergoing a core surgical clerkship over 2 time periods-2007 to 2010 (period 1) and 2016 to 2019 (period 2)-were included.There were 539 medical students in period 1 and 792 in period 2. The percentage of women was stable over time (52.0% vs 54.2%, p = 0.43). Final clerkship grades of Honors increased significantly from period 1 to 2 (22.3% vs 44.3%, p0.0001) and was similarly distributed by gender (women: 21.4% vs 48.0%, p0.0001; men 23.2% vs 39.9%, p0.0001). Honors on examinations remained stable over time and did not differ by gender. Women earned more final clerkship honors than men at academic sites in period 2 (48.4% vs 30.9%, p0.001). This finding was not identified in period 1, nor at nonacademic sites.There was a significant increase in surgical clerkship honors over the past decade, independent of gender. Women attained more clinical and final clerkship honors than men and similar exam grades as time progressed, suggesting that gender bias in the subjective grading of women at this institution does not directly contribute to the loss of talented women as they progress from medical student to faculty within the department, with said gender imbalance not related to clerkship evaluations.

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) barrier function is of fundamental importance in the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Impaired EGJ barrier function leads to excessive distal esophageal acid exposure or, in severe cases, esophagitis. Hence, proposed high-resolution manometry (HRM) metrics assessing EGJ integrity are clinically important and were a focus of the Chicago Classification (CC) working group for inclusion in CC v4.0. However, the EGJ is a complex sphincter comprised of both crural diaphragm (CD) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) component, each of which is subject to independent physiological control mechanisms and pathophysiology. No single metric can capture all attributes of EGJ barrier function. The working group considered several potential metrics of EGJ integrity including LES-CD separation, the EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), the respiratory inversion point (RIP), and intragastric pressure. Strong recommendations were made regarding LES-CD separation as indicative of hiatus hernia, although the numerical threshold for defining hiatal hernia was not agreed upon. There was no agreement on the significance of the RIP, only that it could localize either above the LES or between the LES and CD in cases of hiatus hernia. There was agreement on how to measure the EGJ-CI and that it should be referenced to gastric pressure in units of mmHg��cm, but the numerical threshold indicative of a hypotensive EGJ varied widely among reports and was not agreed upon. Intragastric pressure was endorsed as an important metric worthy of further study but there was no agreement on a numerical threshold indicative of abdominal obesity.

Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high-resolution manometry (HRM). Fifty-two diverse international experts separated into seven working subgroups utilized formal validated methodologies over two-years to develop CCv4.0. Key updates in CCv.4.0 consist of a more rigorous and expansive HRM protocol that incorporates supine and upright test positions as well as provocative testing, a refined definition of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO), more stringent diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and description of baseline EGJ metrics. Further, the CCv4.0 sought to define motility disorder diagnoses as conclusive and inconclusive based on associated symptoms, and findings on provocative testing as well as supportive testing with barium esophagram with tablet and/or functional lumen imaging probe. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification and provide more standardized and rigorous criteria for patterns of disorders of peristalsis and obstruction at the EGJ. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIDDK: P01 DK092217, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Grant/Award Number: P01 DK092217

In symptomatic young patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, early identification of progressive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is critical to prevent long-term complications associated with hiatal hernia, increased esophageal acid and nonacid exposure, release of proinflammatory cytokines, and development of intestinal metaplasia, endoscopically visible Barrett's esophagus, and dysplasia leading to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Progression of GERD may occur in asymptomatic patients and in those under continuous acid-suppressive medication. The long-term side effects of proton-pump inhibitors, chemopreventive agents, and radiofrequency ablation are contentious. In patients with early-stage disease, when the lower esophageal sphincter function is still preserved and before endoscopically visible Barrett's esophagus develops, novel laparoscopic procedures, such as magnetic and electric sphincter augmentation, may have a greater role than conventional surgical therapy. A multidisciplinary approach to GERD by a dedicated team of gastroenterologists and surgeons might impact the patients' lifestyle, the therapeutic choices, and the course of the disease. Biological markers are needed to precisely assess the risk of disease progression and to tailor surveillance, ablation, and management.

Heartburn that persists despite proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is a frequent clinical problem with multiple potential causes. Treatments for PPI-refractory heartburn are of unproven efficacy and focus on controlling gastroesophageal reflux with reflux-reducing medication (e.g., baclofen) or antireflux surgery or on dampening visceral hypersensitivity with neuromodulators (e.g., desipramine).Patients who were referred to Veterans Affairs (VA) gastroenterology clinics for PPI-refractory heartburn received 20 mg of omeprazole twice daily for 2 weeks, and those with persistent heartburn underwent endoscopy, esophageal biopsy, esophageal manometry, and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. If patients were found to have reflux-related heartburn, we randomly assigned them to receive surgical treatment (laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication), active medical treatment (omeprazole plus baclofen, with desipramine added depending on symptoms), or control medical treatment (omeprazole plus placebo). The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as a decrease of 50% or more in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)-Health Related Quality of Life score (range, 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms) at 1 year.A total of 366 patients (mean age, 48.5 years; 280 men) were enrolled. Prerandomization procedures excluded 288 patients: 42 had relief of their heartburn during the 2-week omeprazole trial, 70 did not complete trial procedures, 54 were excluded for other reasons, 23 had non-GERD esophageal disorders, and 99 had functional heartburn (not due to GERD or other histopathologic, motility, or structural abnormality). The remaining 78 patients underwent randomization. The incidence of treatment success with surgery (18 of 27 patients, 67%) was significantly superior to that with active medical treatment (7 of 25 patients, 28%; P = 0.007) or control medical treatment (3 of 26 patients, 12%; P0.001). The difference in the incidence of treatment success between the active medical group and the control medical group was 16 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -5 to 38; P = 0.17).Among patients referred to VA gastroenterology clinics for PPI-refractory heartburn, systematic workup revealed truly PPI-refractory and reflux-related heartburn in a minority of patients. For that highly selected subgroup, surgery was superior to medical treatment. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01265550.).

BACKGROUND: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a heterogenous minor motility disorder diagnosed when ≥50% ineffective peristaltic sequences (distal contractile integral 70% ineffective sequences) is associated with higher esophageal reflux burden, particularly while supine, but milder variants do not progress over time or consistently impact quality of life. Ineffective esophageal motility can be further characterized using provocative maneuvers during HRM, especially multiple rapid swallows, where augmentation of smooth muscle contraction defines contraction reserve. The presence of contraction reserve may predict better prognosis, lesser reflux burden and confidence in a standard fundoplication for surgical management of reflux. Other provocative maneuvers (solid swallows, standardized test meal, rapid drink challenge) are useful to characterize bolus transit in IEM. No effective pharmacotherapy exists, and current managements target symptoms and concurrent reflux. Novel testing modalities (baseline and mucosal impedance, functional lumen imaging probe) show promise in elucidating pathophysiology and stratifying IEM phenotypes. Specific prokinetic agents targeting esophageal smooth muscle need to be developed for precision management.

Achalasia is a relatively rare primary motor esophageal disorder, characterized by absence of relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter and of peristalsis along the esophageal body. As a result, patients typically present with dysphagia, regurgitation and occasionally chest pain, pulmonary complication and malnutrition. New diagnostic methodologies and therapeutic techniques have been recently added to the armamentarium for treating achalasia. With the aim to offer clinicians and patients an up-to-date framework for making informed decisions on the management of this disease, the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus Guidelines proposed and endorsed the Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines (I-GOAL). The guidelines were prepared according the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE-REX) tool, accredited for guideline production by NICE UK. A systematic literature search was performed and the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Given the relative rarity of this disease and the paucity of high-level evidence in the literature, this process was integrated with a three-step process of anonymous voting on each statement (DELPHI). Only statements with an approval rate >80% were accepted in the guidelines. Fifty-one experts from 11 countries and 3 representatives from patient support associations participated to the preparations of the guidelines. These guidelines deal specifically with the following achalasia issues: Diagnostic workup, Definition of the disease, Severity of presentation, Medical treatment, Botulinum Toxin injection, Pneumatic dilatation, POEM, Other endoscopic treatments, Laparoscopic myotomy, Definition of recurrence, Follow up and risk of cancer, Management of end stage achalasia, Treatment options for failure, Achalasia in children, Achalasia secondary to Chagas' disease.

Esophageal symptoms can arise from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as well as other mucosal and motor processes, structural disease, and functional esophageal syndromes. GERD is the most common esophageal disorder, but diagnosis may not be straightforward when symptoms persist despite empiric acid suppressive therapy and when mucosal erosions are not seen on endoscopy (as for nonerosive reflux disease, NERD). Esophageal physiological tests (ambulatory pH or pH-impedance monitoring and manometry) can be of value in defining abnormal reflux burden and reflux-symptom association. NERD diagnosed on the basis of abnormal reflux burden on ambulatory reflux monitoring is associated with similar symptom response from antireflux therapy for erosive esophagitis. Acid suppression is the mainstay of therapy, and antireflux surgery has a definitive role in the management of persisting symptoms attributed to NERD, especially when the esophagogastric junction is compromised. Adjunctive approaches and complementary therapy may be of additional value in management. In this review, we describe the evaluation, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and management of NERD.

Nutcracker esophagus (NE), Jackhammer esophagus (JHE), distal esophageal spasm (DES), and hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (HTLES) are defined by esophageal manometric findings. Some patients with these esophageal motility disorders also have abnormal gastroesophageal reflux. It is unclear to what extent these patients' symptoms are caused by the motility disorder, the acid reflux, or both. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) on esophageal motility disorders, gastroesophageal reflux, and patient symptoms. Between 2007 and 2013, we performed high-resolution esophageal manometry on 3400 patients, and 221 patients were found to have a spastic esophageal motility disorder. The medical records of these patients were reviewed to determine the manometric abnormality, presence of gastroesophageal symptoms, and amount of esophageal acid exposure. In those patients that underwent LNF, we compared pre- and postoperative esophageal motility, gastroesophageal symptom severity, and esophageal acid exposure. Of the 221 patients with spastic motility disorders, 77 had NE, 2 had JHE, 30 had DES, and 112 had HTLES. The most frequently reported primary and secondary symptoms among all patients were: heartburn and/or regurgitation, 69.2%; respiratory, 39.8%; dysphagia, 35.7%; and chest pain, 22.6%. Of the 221 patients, 192 underwent 24-hour pH monitoring, and 103 demonstrated abnormal distal esophageal acid exposure. Abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring was detected in 62% of patients with heartburn and regurgitation, 49% of patients with respiratory symptoms, 36.8 % of patients with dysphagia, and 32.6% of patients with chest pain. Sixty-six of the 103 patients with abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring underwent LNF. Thirty-eight (13NE, 2JHE, 6 DES, and 17 HTLES) of these 66 patients had a minimum of 6-month postoperative follow-up that included clinical evaluation, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH monitoring. Postoperatively, all 38 patients had normal distal esophageal acid exposure. Of these 38 patients, symptoms resolved in 28 and improved in 10. Of six patients (one with NE, two JHE, and three with HTLES) that underwent postoperative esophageal manometry, five exhibited normal motility. Typical reflux symptoms are common among patients with esophageal hypermotility disorders. Abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring is present in the majority of patients with who report typical reflux symptoms and almost half of patients who report respiratory symptoms. Conversely, the majority of patients who report dysphagia or chest pain have normal distal esophageal acid exposure. Based on a small number of patients in this study, it also appears that motility disorders often improve after LNF. LNF is associated with resolution or improvement in reflux related symptoms and esophageal motility parameters in patients exhibiting abnormal esophageal acid exposure. This suggests that patient symptoms are due to abnormal acid exposure and not the motility disorder.

The Chicago Classification describes three distinct subtypes of achalasia and it appears to be a promising tool in predicting results of treatment with standard Heller Myotomy. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of surgical treatment for achalasia using an extended Heller myotomy for each subtype and to identify additional parameters that may predict the success of therapy. 72 consecutive patients with achalasia were evaluated at the University of Washington between 2008 and 2013. Symptom duration, patient age, and the degree of esophageal dilation (stage 1–3) as assessed by radiography were determined. We defined treatment failure as no improvement in symptoms and/or need for a second therapy within 1 year. Long-term follow-up data of 25 patients were available in the form of a survey evaluating overall satisfaction with the operation. The distribution of patients according to subtype included 13 with type I, 54 with type II, and 5 with type III. All of the type I patients had some degree of esophageal dilation on radiography, whereas no dilation was found in the type III group. All patients underwent uneventful laparoscopic-extended Heller myotomy. Two patients were classified as failures, including one with type I and one with type II achalasia; however, further investigation revealed the cause of both failures to be the development of peptic stricture. Only one of the 25 patients with long-term follow-up reported dissatisfaction with the treatment result and indicated persistent chest pain without dysphagia. Laparoscopic-extended Heller myotomy is a highly successful treatment for patients with achalasia and outcomes do not appear to vary significantly according to the manometric subtype. Failures may result from reflux in patients who develop esophagitis or stricture. Chest pain is not always responsive to esophagogastric myotomy despite relief of dysphagia.

William H. Allum,1 Luigi Bonavina,2 Stephen D. Cassivi,3 Miguel A. Cuesta,4 Zhao Ming Dong,5 Valter Nilton Felix,6 Edgar Figueredo,7 Piers A.C. Gatenby,1,8,9 Leonie Haverkamp,10 Maksat A. Ibraev,11 Mark J. Krasna,12 Rene Lambert,13 Rupert Langer,14 Michael P.N. Lewis,15 Katie S. Nason,16 Kevin Parry,10 Shaun R. Preston,8 Jelle P. Ruurda,10 Lara W. Schaheen,16 Roger P. Tatum,7 Igor N. Turkin,11 Sylvia van der Horst,10 Donald L. van der Peet,4 Peter C. van der Sluis,10 Richard van Hillegersberg,10 Justin C.R. Wormald,15 Peter C. Wu,7 and Barbara M. Zonderhuis4 1Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 2Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan School of Medicine, Milano, Italy. 3Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 4Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 5Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 6Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 7Department of Surgery, VA Puget Sound and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 8Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, United Kingdom. 9Academic Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 10Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 11N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, RAMS, Moscow, Russia. 12Department of Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, New Jersey. 13Screening Group at WHO, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. 14Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 15Department of General Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom. 16Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Background Competent interpretation of esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is integral to a quality study. Currently, methods to assess physician competency for the interpretation of esophageal HRM do not exist. The aim of this study was to use formal techniques to (i) develop an HRM interpretation exam, and (ii) establish minimum competence benchmarks for HRM interpretation skills at the trainee, physician interpreter, and master level. Methods A total of 29 physicians from 8 academic centers participated in the study: 9 content experts separated into 2 study groups—expert test-takers (n=7) and judges (n=2), and 20 HRM inexperienced trainees (“trainee test-taker”; n=20). We designed the HRM interpretation exam based on expert consensus. Expert and trainee test-takers (n=27) completed the exam. According to the modified Angoff method, the judges reviewed the test-taker performance and established minimum competency cut scores for HRM interpretation skills. Key Results The HRM interpretation exam consists of 22 HRM cases with 8 HRM interpretation skills per case: identification of pressure inversion point, hiatal hernia >3 cm, integrated relaxation pressure, distal contractile integral, distal latency, peristaltic integrity, pressurization pattern, and diagnosis. Based on the modified Angoff method, minimum cut scores for HRM interpretation skills at the trainee, physician interpreter, and master level ranged from 65–80%, 85–90% (with the exception of peristaltic integrity), and 90–95%, respectively. Conclusions & Inferences Using a formal standard setting technique, we established minimum cut scores for eight HRM interpretation skills across interpreter levels. This examination and associated cut scores can be applied in clinical practice to judge competency.

For patients with achalasia, a complete workup including upper endoscopy, esophageal radiography, and esophageal manometry is essential to definitively confirm the diagnosis. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Toupet partial posterior fundoplication is an extremely effective treatment for symptoms of dysphagia and regurgitation, as well as the respiratory symptoms that frequently accompany this disease, and can be considered as first line of therapy in the majority of patients. In particular, it is important to ensure that the length of the myotomy onto the gastric cardia is at least 3 cm in order to achieve the highest patient satisfaction rates with the least likelihood of needing subsequent intervention for dysphagia.

There are limited studies that evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic fundoplication (EF) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with the EsophyX™ device, especially with the most recent procedural iteration (TIF-2). This study was a prospective evaluation of our early experience with this device and procedure.Data were collected prospectively on 23 consecutive patients undergoing EF (March 2009 to August 2010). All patients completed a symptom questionnaire assessing frequency and severity of gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms, 24-h pH, and manometry studies preoperatively and were encouraged to repeat these at 6 months.All patients had abnormal pH studies and were on proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy prior to EF. Median age was 47 years (19-62 years), and six (23%) were male. Nine (41%) patients had Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m(2), and three (14%) had a small hiatal hernia (≤ 2 cm). The procedure was aborted in two patients for retained food. Three patients underwent subsequent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for persistent or recurrent symptoms. Median hospitalization was 1 day, and there were no major perioperative complications. At 6 month follow-up, 19 (86%) patients completed a symptom questionnaire, and 14 (64%) and 11 (50%) patients underwent pH and manometry studies, respectively. There was a significant reduction in heartburn (P = 0.02), total percentage acid contact time (P = 0.002), DeMeester score (P = 0.002), and PPI use (P = 0.003). Overall, 8 out of 14 (57%) patients had abnormal pH studies and 11 out of 19 (58%) remained on PPI therapy at 6 months.EF with EsophyX™ is associated with significant reduction in heartburn and abnormal acid exposure at 6 months, although the majority of patients did not experience normalization of their pH studies and remained on PPI therapy. The procedure has an acceptable safety profile, but the question remains as to whether it is effective enough to warrant a place in the armamentarium for the treatment of GERD.

The following on surgical treatments for Barrett's esophagus includes commentaries on the indications for antireflux surgery after medical treatment; the effects of the various procedures on the lower esophageal sphincter; the role of impaired esophageal motility and delayed gastric emptying in the choice of the surgical procedure; indications for associated highly selective vagotomy, duodenal switch, and gastric electrical stimulation; therapeutic strategies for detection and treatment of shortened esophagus; the role of antireflux surgery on the regression of metaplastic mucosa and the risk of malignant progression; the detection of asymptomatic reflux brfore bariatric surgery; the role of non-GERD symptoms on the results of surgery; and the indications of Collis gastroplasty and choice of the type of fundoplication.

The following presents commentaries on the interest of high-resolution manometry for understanding the anatomy and physiology of the esophagogastric junction; the subtypes of achalasia, as diagnosed by high-resolution manometry; the interest of high-resolution manometry in the evaluation of dysphagia following fundoplication; and the appropriate clinical protocol for high-resolution manometry.

The following on prevalence and incidence of adenocarcinomas in Barrett's esphophagus (BE) includes commentaries on the mechanisms of a potential protective effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on progression of BE to high-grade dysplasia; evaluation of the role of PPIs in decreasing the risk of degeneration; the geographical variations of incidence of BE; the role of the nonmorphologic biomarkers; the relationship between length of BE and development of cancer; the confounding factors in incidence rates of BE; the role of the increase of cell differentiation and apoptosis induced by PPIs in the diminution of cancer risk; the frequency of occult neoplastic foci and unsuspected invasive cancer in surgical specimens; the influence on the indications of endoscopic therapy; the overestimation of regression in surgical series; attempts to evaluate the reasons for variations of cancer incidence in the literature; and progress in screening and surveillance for BE.

Some patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) suffer from laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). There is no reliable diagnostic test for LPR as there is for GERD. We hypothesized that detection of pepsin (a molecule only made in the stomach) in laryngeal epithelium or sputum should provide evidence for reflux of gastric contents to the larynx, and be diagnostic of LPR. We tested this hypothesis in a prospective study in patients with LPR symptoms undergoing antireflux surgery (ARS). Nine patients undergoing ARS for LPR symptoms were studied pre- and postoperatively using a clinical symptom questionnaire, laryngoscopy, 24-h pH monitoring, biopsy of posterior laryngeal mucosa, and sputum collection for pepsin Western blot assay. The primary presenting LPR symptom was hoarseness in six, cough in two, and globus sensation in one patient. Pepsin was detected in the laryngeal mucosa in eight of nine patients preoperatively. There was correlation between biopsy and sputum (+/+ or −/−) in four of five patients, both analyzed preoperatively. Postoperatively, pH monitoring improved in all but one patient and normalized in five of eight patients. Eight of nine patients reported improvement in their primary LPR symptom (six good, two mild). Only one patient (who had negative preoperative pepsin) reported no response to treatment of the primary LPR symptom. Postoperatively, pepsin was detected in only one patient. Pepsin is often found on laryngeal epithelial biopsy and in sputum of patients with pH-test-proven GERD and symptoms of LPR. ARS improves symptoms and clears pepsin from the upper airway. Detection of pepsin improves diagnostic accuracy in patients with LPR.

Although patients with achalasia complain mainly of dysphagia, we have observed that they also have a high rate of respiratory problems. We hypothesized that the latter may be due to poor esophageal clearance leading to aspiration. This study examines the effect of Heller myotomy on these symptoms. We studied the course of 111 patients with achalasia who underwent Heller myotomy between 1994 and 2008 and who agreed to participate in this study. All patients completed a questionnaire postoperatively assessing the preoperative and postoperative prevalence and severity of symptoms using visual analog scales. Patients were divided into two groups: one that included all those with respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, hoarseness, cough, wheezing, sore throat, and/or a history of asthma or pneumonia) prior to myotomy and one that included those without those symptoms. All patients presented with dysphagia as their primary complaint, and 63 (57%) reported respiratory symptoms or disease prior to surgery. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics between those with and without respiratory manifestations. After a median follow-up of 71 months (range 9–186 months), 55 (87%) patients reported durable improvement of dysphagia. The frequency and severity of all respiratory symptoms decreased significantly. Twenty-four of the 29 patients (82%) who reported a history of pneumonia prior to surgery did not experience recurrent episodes after Heller myotomy. A Heller myotomy is effective in improving esophageal emptying in patients with achalasia. This results in sustained improvement of dysphagia and associated respiratory symptoms/diseases. This suggests that respiratory symptoms/diseases in these patients are likely caused by esophageal retention of food and secretions, and then aspiration.

Achalasia is a primary esophageal motor disorder that results in poor clearance of the esophagus. Although an esophagus filled with debris and undigested food should put these patients at risk for aspiration, the frequency with which the latter occurs has never been documented. In this study, we sought to determine the incidence of respiratory symptoms and complaints in patients with achalasia. A comprehensive symptom questionnaire was administered to 110 patients with achalasia presenting to the Swallowing Center at the University of Washington between 1994 and 2008 as part of their preoperative work-up. Questionnaires were analyzed for the frequency of respiratory complaints in addition to the more typical symptoms of dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain. Twenty-two achalasia patients with respiratory symptoms who had also undergone Heller myotomy and completed a post-op follow-up questionnaire were analyzed as a subset. Ninety-five patients (86%) complained of at least daily dysphagia. Fifty-one patients (40%) reported the occurrence of at least one respiratory symptom daily, including cough in 41 patients (37%), aspiration (the sensation of inhaling regurgitated esophagogastric material) in 34 patients (31%), hoarseness in 23 patients (21%), wheezing in 17 patients (15%), shortness of breath in 11 patients (10%), and sore throat in 13 patients (12%). Neither age nor gender differed between those with and those without respiratory symptoms. In the subset of patients with respiratory symptoms who had undergone Heller myotomy, respiratory symptoms improved in the majority after the procedure. Patients with achalasia experience respiratory symptoms with much greater frequency than the approximately 10% that was previously believed. Awareness of this association may be important in the workup and ultimate treatment of patients with this uncommon esophageal disorder.

From 10% to 25% of patients undergoing antireflux procedures eventually redevelop symptoms as a result of anatomic failure of the hiatal repair or fundoplication. High-resolution manometry (HRM) allows for reliable evaluation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in detail, including subtle evidence of a hiatus hernia. The aim of this study was to characterize the dynamics and function of the LES postoperatively using HRM to determine which elements may contribute to recurrent symptoms after antireflux surgery.Twenty-three patients with recurrent symptoms and/or abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring after Nissen fundoplication (Unsuccessful group) and 11 asymptomatic post-Nissen patients tested as routine follow-up (Successful group) underwent HRM. Tracings were analyzed for percentage of peristalsis, LES pressure, length of the high-pressure zone (HPZ), LES residual pressure, and the presence of a dual HPZ (indicating a recurrent hiatus hernia). Results were compared between the 2 groups.Mean LES pressure tended to be greater in the Successful group compared with the Unsuccessful group (p = 0.068). There were no differences in length of the HPZ, residual pressures, and peristalsis. A dual HPZ was identified in 13 Unsuccessful group patients (56%), and 1 (9%) of the Successful group patients (p0.05). Abnormal DeMeester scores were observed in 79% of patients with a dual HPZ, compared with 35% of patients without a dual HPZ (p0.05).The presence of a dual HPZ on HRM in patients after fundoplication appears to be a strong predictor of recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease. In patients with recurrent symptoms after antireflux surgery, HRM also provides valuable information about peristalsis and LES characteristics that help guide appropriate management.

Achalasia, an esophageal motility disorder characterized by aperistalsis and failure of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, is most effectively treated by surgical ablation of the LES. In this report, we describe our technique of laparoscopic extended Heller myotomy with Toupet partial posterior fundoplication. The technical details of this procedure include careful division of the longitudinal and circular muscle fibers of the LES anteriorly, including extension of the myotomy 3 cm distal to the esophagogastric junction onto the gastric cardia. The Toupet procedure, involving a posterior wrap of the gastric fundus which is secured to both edges of the myotomy as well as to the crura of the hiatus, is added to prevent post-myotomy gastroesophageal reflux. From a recently published report, mean dysphagia scores remained low (3 out of 10 severity on a visual analog scale) and symptoms of reflux were reported minimally in a series of 63 patients followed for a median of 45 months. This technique provides excellent and durable relief of dysphagia associated with achalasia while minimizing post-myotomy acid reflux symptoms.

Paraesophageal hernia repair has been associated with a recurrence rate of up to 42%. Thus, in the last decade, there has been increasing interest in the use of mesh reinforcement of the hiatal repair. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is one of the materials that have been used for this purpose, as it is thought to induce minimal tissue reaction. We report two cases in which complications specific to the use of PTFE mesh in this location developed over time. In the first patient, a gastrectomy was required to remove a large PTFE mesh which had eroded into the esophagogastric junction and gastric cardia. The second patient experienced severe dysphagia resulting from a stricture caused by the implant, requiring removal of the mesh. Although such complications have only rarely been reported, the severity and consequences of these incidents, as reported in the literature and in light of our observations, suggest that an alternative to PTFE should be considered for crural reinforcement during paraesophageal hernia repair.

Background & Aims Quality esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies require competent interpretation of data. However, there is little understanding of learning curves, training requirements, or measures of competency for HRM. We aimed to develop and use a competency assessment system to examine learning curves for interpretation of HRM data. Methods We conducted a prospective multicenter study of 20 gastroenterology trainees with no experience in HRM, from 8 centers, over an 8-month period (May through December 2015). We designed a web-based HRM training and competency assessment system. After reviewing the training module, participants interpreted 50 HRM studies and received answer keys at the fifth and then at every second interpretation. A cumulative sum procedure produced individual learning curves with preset acceptable failure rates of 10%; we classified competency status as competency not achieved, competency achieved, or competency likely achieved. Results Five (25%) participants achieved competence, 4 (20%) likely achieved competence, and 11 (55%) failed to achieve competence. A minimum case volume to achieve competency was not identified. There was no significant agreement between diagnostic accuracy and accuracy for individual HRM skills. Conclusions We developed a competency assessment system for HRM interpretation; using this system, we found significant variation in learning curves for HRM diagnosis and individual skills. Our system effectively distinguished trainee competency levels for HRM interpretation and contrary to current recommendations, found that competency for HRM is not case-volume specific.

Background & Aims: In certain cases of achalasia, particularly those in early stages with minimal endoscopic or radiographic abnormalities, the diagnosis may rely on manometry, which is the most sensitive test for the disease. The aim of this study was to critically evaluate the manometric criteria in a population of patients with idiopathic achalasia. Methods: Clinical histories and manometric recordings of 58 patients with idiopathic achalasia and 43 control subjects were analyzed with regard to esophageal body contraction amplitude, peristaltic effectiveness in terms of both completeness and propagation velocity, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure, LES relaxation pressure, and intraesophageal–intragastric pressure gradient. Variants of achalasia were defined by finding manometric features that significantly differed from the remainder of achalasia patients, such that the diagnosis might be questioned. Results: Four manometrically distinct variants were identified. These variants were characterized by (1) the presence of high amplitude esophageal body contractions, (2) a short segment of esophageal body aperistalsis, (3) retained complete deglutitive LES relaxation, and (4) intact transient LES relaxation. In each instance, the most extreme variant is discussed and compared with the remainder of the achalasia population and with controls. Conclusions: The significance in defining these variants of achalasia lies in the recognition that these sometimes confusing manometric findings are consistent with achalasia when combined with additional clinical data supportive of the diagnosis. Furthermore, such variants provide important clues into the pathophysiology of this rare disorder. GASTROENTEROLOGY 2001;120:789-798

Introduction. Dysphagia is common after Nissen fundoplication but the relationship between dysphagia and bolus transit is poorly defined. This study compared bolus transit of fundoplication patients to normal individuals. Methods. Twelve fundoplication patients and 20 healthy volunteers rated their ability to swallow eight bolus consistencies from no difficulty (0) to extreme difficulty (3) to compute a dysphagia score (range 5 0 ‐24). A 16-lumen manometric assembly was positioned across the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and subjects were imaged fluoroscopically in a supine posture while swallowing 5 cc liquid barium and a 5-cc marshmallow-like viscoelastic barium bolus. Videofluoroscopic images were analyzed for total esophageal transit time and the fraction of time required to cross the EGJ. Manometric tracings were analyzed for the intrabolus pressure proximal to the EGJ, intragastric pressure, and distal peristaltic amplitude for each bolus. Results. Dysphagia scores for fundoplication patients were significantly higher (7.3 6 5.1, range 5 1‐17) than for normals (0.5 6 0.6, range 5 0 ‐2). This correlated with longer total transit times for liquids and solids (r 5 0.60, P < 0.01) and a greater percentage of transit time attributable to the EGJ transit. Retrograde flow at the EGJ (escape of bolus proximally up the esophagus) and peristaltic dysfunction were more frequent in fundoplication patients. However, no differences existed in manometric parameters between groups. Conclusions. Fundoplication impairs both liquid and solid esophageal bolus transit. Dysphagia perceived by fundoplication patients correlated with increased transit time, particularly across the EGJ. Combined quantitative evaluation with manometry and fluoroscopy reveals functional defects in fundoplication subjects, which are not evident by either modality alone. © 2000 Academic Press

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) experience a wide spectrum of symptoms, varying both in quality and severity. This review summarizes clinical observations of esophageal sensitivity and symptom perception in GERD patients. The Bernstein test, although lacking standardization, remains a useful tool in determining esophageal sensitivity to acid stimuli. Ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring with symptom event marking and subsequent symptom-reflux correlation between acid reflux events and esophageal symptomatology now provides an alternative method for establishing esophageal acid sensitivity. The intraesophageal balloon distention test (IEBD) was developed to assess esophageal sensitivity to mechanical stimuli. Variants of each of these tests have been applied to the evaluation of uncomplicated GERD patients and patients with esophagitis and Barrett's metaplasia, who generally demonstrate less esophageal sensitivity than the former group. Studies using these methods have demonstrated increased esophageal sensitivity in patients with esophageal chest pain and have also identified a subset of patients with esophageal symptoms yet normal esophageal acid exposure, a condition referred to as "hypersensitive esophagus." The Bernstein test, 24-hour pH monitoring with symptom assessment, and IEBD have each contributed to our understanding of esophageal pain syndromes; it is hoped that future work in this area will lead to improved and more specific therapy for these patients.

Background & Aims Esophageal manometry is the standard for the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Variations in the performance and interpretation of esophageal manometry result in discrepant diagnoses and unnecessary repeated procedures, and could have negative effects on patient outcomes. We need a method to benchmark the procedural quality of esophageal manometry; as such, our objective was to formally develop quality measures for the performance and interpretation of data from esophageal manometry. Methods We used the RAND University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method (RAM) to develop validated quality measures for performing and interpreting esophageal manometry. The research team identified potential quality measures through a literature search and interviews with experts. Fourteen experts in esophageal manometry ranked the proposed quality measures for appropriateness via a 2-round process on the basis of RAM. Results The experts considered a total of 29 measures; 17 were ranked as appropriate and were as follows: related to competency (2), assessment before the esophageal manometry procedure (2), the esophageal manometry procedure itself (3), and interpretation of data (10). The data interpretation measures were integrated into a single composite measure. Eight measures therefore were found to be appropriate quality measures for esophageal manometry . Five other factors also were endorsed by the experts, although these were not ranked as appropriate quality measures. Conclusions We identified 8 formally validated quality measures for the performance and interpretation of data from esophageal manometry on the basis of RAM. These measures represent key aspects of a high-quality esophageal manometry study and should be adopted uniformly. These measures should be evaluated in clinical practice to determine how they affect patient outcomes.

The following presents commentaries on the interest of high-resolution manometry for understanding the anatomy and physiology of the esophagogastric junction; the subtypes of achalasia, as diagnosed by high-resolution manometry; the interest of high-resolution manometry in the evaluation of dysphagia following fundoplication; and the appropriate clinical protocol for high-resolution manometry.

The following on prevalence and incidence of adenocarcinomas in Barrett's esphophagus (BE) includes commentaries on the mechanisms of a potential protective effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on progression of BE to high-grade dysplasia; evaluation of the role of PPIs in decreasing the risk of degeneration; the geographical variations of incidence of BE; the role of the nonmorphologic biomarkers; the relationship between length of BE and development of cancer; the confounding factors in incidence rates of BE; the role of the increase of cell differentiation and apoptosis induced by PPIs in the diminution of cancer risk; the frequency of occult neoplastic foci and unsuspected invasive cancer in surgical specimens; the influence on the indications of endoscopic therapy; the overestimation of regression in surgical series; attempts to evaluate the reasons for variations of cancer incidence in the literature; and progress in screening and surveillance for BE.

SUMMARY Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, some patients develop dysphagia postoperatively. Manometry is used to evaluate disorders of peristalsis, but has not been proven useful to identify which patients may be at risk for postoperative dysphagia. Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) evaluates the effective clearance of a swallowed bolus through the esophagus. We hypothesized that MII combined with manometry may detect those patients most at risk of developing dysphagia after LNF. Between March 2003 and January 2007, 74 patients who agreed to participate in this study were prospectively enrolled. All patients completed a preoperative symptom questionnaire, MII/manometry, and 24-h pH monitoring. All patients underwent LNF. Symptom questionnaires were administered postoperatively at a median of 18 months (range: 6–46 months), and we defined dysphagia (both preoperatively and postoperatively) as occurring more than once a month with a severity ≥4 (0–10 Symptom Severity Index). Thirty-two patients (43%) reported preoperative dysphagia, but there was no significant difference in pH monitoring, lower esophageal sphincter pressure/relaxation, peristalsis, liquid or viscous bolus transit (MII), or bolus transit time (MII) between patients with and without preoperative dysphagia. In those patients reporting preoperative dysphagia, the severity of dysphagia improved significantly from 6.8 ± 2 to 2.6 ± 3.4 (P < 0.001) after LNF. Thirteen (17%) patients reported dysphagia postoperatively, 10 of whom (75%) reported some degree of preoperative dysphagia. The presence of postoperative dysphagia was significantly more common in patients with preoperative dysphagia (P= 0.01). Patients with postoperative dysphagia had similar lower esophageal sphincter pressure and relaxation, peristalsis, and esophageal clearance to those without dysphagia. Neither MII nor manometry predicts dysphagia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease or its occurrence after LNF. The presence of dysphagia preoperatively is the only predictor of dysphagia after LNF.

Background The purpose of this analysis was to determine if the surgical clerkship model and site affect educational outcomes and student postclerkship perceptions. Methods Data from University of Washington students participating in surgical clerkships at traditional/academic or community/apprentice sites across Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho (WWAMI) between 2005 and 2007 were gathered retrospectively. Comparisons of final examination scores as well as postclerkship student evaluations of the educational experience were made between traditional and community training sites. Results The mean final examination scores at WWAMI sites were significantly higher than those at traditional academic sites. Furthermore, WWAMI sites were rated higher with respect to time spent by faculty in direct observation, quality of the clerkship as a whole, and overall contribution to medical education. Conclusions Community surgical clerkship sites remote from an academic institution can provide an excellent learning experience for students.

Treatment for Achalasia is aimed at the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), although little is known about the effect, if any, of these treatments on esophageal body function (peristalsis and clearance). We sought to measure the effect of various treatments using combined manometry (peristalsis) with Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance (MII) (esophageal clearance). We enrolled 56 patients with Achalasia referred to the University of Washington Swallowing Center between January 2003 and January 2006. Each was grouped according to prior treatment: 38 were untreated (untreated achalasia), 10 had undergone botox injection or balloon dilation (endoscopic treatment), and 16 a laparoscopic Heller myotomy. The preoperative studies for 8 of the myotomy patients were included in the untreated achalasia group. Each patient completed a dysphagia severity questionnaire (scale 0–10). Peristalsis was analyzed by manometry and esophageal clearance of liquid and viscous material by MII. Mean dysphagia severity scores were significantly better in patients after Heller Myotomy than in either of the other groups (2.0 vs. 5.3 in the endoscopic group and 6.5 in untreated achalasia, p

Hypothesis: Operative manometry detects residual esophagogastric junction (EGJ) high pressure, ensuring complete myotomy. Design: Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic myotomy. Setting: Tertiary care academic medical center. Patients: From 1997 to 2003, 139 patients with achalasia underwent laparoscopic myotomy. Interventions: We assessed myotomy completeness by operative endoscopy and performed operative manometry to measure pressure across the EGJ myotomy. Residual high pressure was isolated and intact muscle divided. Main Outcome Measures: Esophageal manometry, quality of life, and dysphagia severity score. Results: Median lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 27 mm Hg preoperatively; 10 patients had sigmoid esophagus and 57 had previous dilation and/or toxin injection. There were 136 laparoscopic myotomies and 3 conversions to open procedures (2%). Operative endoscopy was performed in all patients. Operative manometry, completed in 132 patients (95%), identified residual EGJ high pressure leading to myotomy revision in 45 patients (31 in the first 70 treated). Small perforations occurred in 19 patients, associated with previous dilation and/or toxin injection in 12 patients. One-month follow-up was available in 136 patients (98%); 126 patients had minimal symptoms (93%), whereas 1 had recurrent EGJ high pressure, 5 esophagitis, 3 sigmoid esophagus, and 1 paraesophageal hernia. In 60 patients with complete 1-year follow-up, quality of life and dysphagia improved (P

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (tLESRs) are vagally mediated in response to gastric cardiac distension. Nine volunteers, eight gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients, and eight fundoplication patients were studied. Manometry with an assembly that included a barostat bag was done for 1 h with and 1 h without barostat distension to 8 mmHg. Recordings were scored for tLESRs and barostat bag volume. Fundoplication patients had fewer tLESRs (0.4 ± 0.3/h) than either normal subjects (2.4 ± 0.5/h) or GERD patients (2.0 ± 0.3/h). The tLESRs rate increased significantly in normal subjects (5.8 ± 0.9/h) and GERD patients (5.4 ± 0.8/h) during distension but not in the fundoplication group. All groups exhibited similar gastric accommodation (change in volume/change in pressure) in response to distension. Fundoplication patients exhibit a lower tLESR rate at rest and a marked attenuation of the response to gastric distension compared with either controls or GERD patients. Gastric accommodation was not impaired with fundoplication. This suggests that the receptive field for triggering tLESRs is contained within a wider field for elicitation of gastric receptive relaxation and that only the first is affected by fundoplication.

Background: High Resolution Manometry (HRM) yields better understanding of esophageal motility than does conventional manometry, and a new classification system which describes three distinct HRM subtypes of achalasia based on esophageal body contraction patterns appears to be a promising tool in predicting results of treatment with standard Heller Myotomy. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of surgical treatment with extended Heller myotomy) for each subtype and to identify additional parameters that may predict success of therapy. Methods: From 2008 to 2013 at a single institution 72 patients underwent laparoscopic extended Heller myotomy for first time. In addition to manometric parameters, clinical records were reviewed for symptom duration, patient age at the time of referral, and preoperative esophageal dilation (stage I-III) as assessed by radiography. We defined treatment failure as no improvement in symptoms and/or need for a second therapy within one year after the operation. Long term follow up data (15 to 46 months) was available for a subset of 25 patients in the form of a survey evaluating overall satisfaction with the operation. Results: The 72myotomy patients included 11 with type I (no contractions), 56 with type II (pan-esophageal pressurizations), and 5 with type III (high-amplitude distal spasm). Failure was found in 1 patient with manometric type I and radiologic stage III esophageal dilation, 1 patient with manometric type II and radiologic stage II esophageal dilation, and none with manometric type III. All of the type I patients had at least some degree of esophageal dilation on radiography, whereas no dilation was found in the type III group. Treatment failure was not observed in any of the patients under 50 years old (n= 35) nor in any patients with stage I esophageal dilation. Only one of the 25 patients with long term follow up reported dissatisfaction with the treatment result; this patient had type II achalasia on HRM and esophageal dilation was stage I. Conclusions: Overall, laparoscopic extended Heller myotomy is a highly successful treatment for patients with achalasia, and outcomes do not appear to vary significantly according to HRM subtypes. Stage I esophageal dilation and age below 50 may be better indicators of consistent symptom relief after surgical therapy for this disease.

We report our initial experience using operative esophageal manometry as an adjunct to endoscopy to determine the completeness of esophagogastric high-pressure zone (HPZ) obliteration during laparoscopic Heller myotomy.Between July 1997 and October 1998, we performed laparoscopic Heller myotomies in 20 patients (eight male, 12 female; median age, 41 years). Mean duration of symptoms was 3.2 +/- 2.6 years (r = 0.5-11), and 45% of the patients had received prior dilation or toxin injection. A 16-channel esophageal manometry catheter was placed prior to anesthesia, with sites crossing the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). An endoscope was passed intraoperatively to localize the squamocolumnar junction, and the myotomy was performed. While the translucency was imaged in the area of the incision, we determined the adequacy of myotomy by visual assessment of LES and gastric cardia opening in response to endoscopic air insufflation. Manometry was then performed to detect any potential residual high pressure at the myotomized esophagogastric junction (EGJ). If it was found, the locus of persistent pressure was identified by probing along the myotomy, and residual muscle fibers were cut to yield a minimum pressure at the EGJ.A persistent HPZ was identified after the initial myotomy in 10 of 20 patients (50%). A Dor fundoplasty completed the operation. The mean operating time was 2.6 +/- 0.5 h (median, 2.5; r = 2-3.5 h), and the mean hospital stay was 1.6 +/- 1 days (median, 1, r = 1-5 days). The mean LES pressure was 2 +/- 3 mmHg immediately postmyotomy (p0.001 compared with preoperative value). Of 20 patients, only two have reported recurrence of dysphagia (10%). One had a recurrent HPZ on manometry, and one developed esophagitis, which resolved with omeprazole.Our initial experience suggests that operative esophageal manometry is a useful adjunct to upper endoscopy during laparoscopic Heller myotomy, quantitatively assuring obliteration of the nonrelaxing LES and HPZ.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the efficacy and mechanism of solid bolus transit through the esophagus. METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers were studied with concurrent manometry and videofluoroscopy while swallowing 5 ml liquid barium, a 5–6 mm diameter bread ball, and 4 g chewed bread in both a supine and upright posture. As many as four successive swallows were performed until clearance was achieved. RESULTS: The esophageal clearance of liquid barium was 100% with the first swallow. Clearance of the unchewed bread ball occurred with the first swallow in only 6.7% of trials in the upright posture and 5.9% in the supine posture. After four swallows, clearance was 100% and 52.9% in the upright and supine postures, respectively. Chewed bread was more readily cleared than unchewed bread, with 100% clearance after two swallows in the upright posture and 91% clearance after four swallows in the supine posture. The most common locus of bread stasis was at the aortic arch and carina. The bread boluses were noted to move more effectively when localized in the head as opposed to the tail of the bolus composite. Nonocclusive contractions often occurred at the bolus tail despite the increased peristaltic amplitude seen with the chewed bread. Failed peristalsis, a frequent cause for solid clearance failure, was observed during 30% of all bread swallows. This usually occurred distal to the stopping point of the bolus, suggesting it to be the result rather than the cause of impaired transit. CONCLUSIONS: Although infrequently perceived by these normal subjects and in contradistinction to liquid clearance, bread is rarely cleared from the esophagus with a single swallow. Mastication and an upright posture facilitate the esophageal transport of solids. Bolus composition and impaired bolus transit alter the amplitude and conductance of peristalsis. Manometric data pertaining to liquid clearance through the esophagus do not readily apply to bread.