Search

BACKGROUND A third of adolescents experiencing a concussion will suffer from persistent post-concussion symptoms lasting a month or beyond. The ability to cope with concussion symptoms, regulate emotions, and manage stress is an important determinant of risk for prolonged symptoms. Early psychological interventions, such as mindfulness-based interventions, might improve concussion recovery. OBJECTIVE This open-label mixed-methods pilot study assessed the acceptability and credibility of a mindfulness-based intervention delivered through a digital therapeutic (DTx; therapeutic smartphone app) for pediatric concussion. METHODS Participants aged 12-18 years were recruited from an emergency department within 48 hours of a concussion (acute cohort) or from a tertiary care clinic at least 1 month post-concussion (persistent symptom cohort). Participants completed a novel 4-week mindfulness-based intervention, for 10-15 min/day, at a minimum of 4 days/week. At 2 weeks post-concussion, participants completed a credibility questionnaire. At 4 weeks, participants completed questionnaires assessing satisfaction, usability, and working alliance, as well as a semi-structured phone interview. RESULTS 10 participants completed the study outcomes, including 7 acute (5 females; median [IQR] age=14.73 [13.94,16.94] years and 3 persistent symptom patients (2 females; median [IQR] age=17.62 [17.48,17.86] years). Across cohorts, half-way through the intervention, the treatment expectation was moderate (median=6.00 [3.58,7.75], maximum possible=9.00). Moreover, the intervention was perceived as credible (median=6.50 [6.83,8.75], maximum possible=9.00). At 4 weeks, the DTx was considered usable (median=70.00 [55.00,82.50], maximum possible=100.00). Participants rated their satisfaction with the DTx (median=27.00 [24.50,29.50], maximum possible=32.00) and the working alliance with the digital mindfulness guides (median=3.92 [3.38-4.33], maximum possible=5.00) as high. Four themes were identified from the qualitative data: 1) positive attributes (including accessibility, ease of use, perceived effectiveness, variety of features, and meditation guides); 2) negative attributes (technical issues that acted as a barrier to use, and sounds and lights that were triggering headaches); 3) ideas for modifications; and 4) technical issues. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents were very satisfied with a mindfulness-based intervention delivered via a smartphone app and considered it to be usable and credible. Results inform modifications to the DTx, instructions, and mindfulness intervention, and potential ways to increase adherence by leveraging positive attributes. A randomized control trial will assess the effectiveness of the DTx to decrease the risk of persistent symptoms and reduce the symptom burden following pediatric concussion. The present mixed-methods study and the iterative approach to intervention design we are using will ensure better translation and impact of interventions for adolescents with concussions.

This substudy of a prospective case-ascertained household transmission study investigated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-positive individuals without antibody development and factors associated with nonseroconversion. Approximately 1 of 8 individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 did not seroconvert. Children, particularly the youngest, were approximately half as likely to seroconvert compared with adults. Apart from the absence of fever/chills, individual symptoms did not strongly predict nonseroconversion.

Household transmission contributes to SARS-CoV-2 spread, but the role of children in transmission is unclear. We conducted a study that included symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adults exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in their households with the objective of determining how SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted within households.In this case-ascertained antibody-surveillance study, we enrolled households in Ottawa, Ontario, in which at least 1 household member had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing. The enrolment period was September 2020 to March 2021. Potentially eligible participants were identified if they had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at an academic emergency department or affiliated testing centre; people who learned about the study through the media could also self-identify for participation. At least 2 participants were required for a household to be eligible for study participation, and at least 1 enrolled participant per household had to be a child (age18 yr). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to evaluate SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA, IgM and IgG against the spike-trimer and nucleocapsid protein. The primary outcome was household secondary attack rate, defined as the proportion of household contacts positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibody among the total number of household contacts participating in the study. We performed descriptive statistics at both the individual and household levels. To estimate and compare outcomes between patient subgroups, and to examine predictors of household transmission, we fitted a series of multivariable logistic regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering of individuals within households.We enrolled 695 participants from 180 households: 180 index participants (74 children, 106 adults) and 515 of their household contacts (266 children, 249 adults). A total of 487 household contacts (94.6%) (246 children, 241 adults) had SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing, of whom 239 had a positive result (secondary attack rate 49.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 42.9%-55.3%). Eighty-eight (36.8%, 95% CI 29.3%-43.2%) of the 239 were asymptomatic; asymptomatic rates were similar for children (51/130 [39.2%, 95% CI 30.7%-48.5%]) and adults (37/115 [32.2%, 95% CI 24.2%-41.4%]) (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.1). Adults were more likely than children to transmit SARS-CoV-2 (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.6). The odds of transmission from asymptomatic (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2-1.4) versus symptomatic (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.4) index participants to household contacts was uncertain. Predictors of household transmission included household density (number of people per bedroom), relationship to index participant and number of cases in the household.The rate of SARS-CoV-2 transmission within households was nearly 50% during the study period, and children were an important source of spread. The findings suggest that children are an important driver of the COVID-19 pandemic; this should inform public health policy.

This study investigates whether acute treatment with ibuprofen, acetaminophen, or both is associated with resolution of headache or reduction of headache pain at 7 days post-concussion in children and youth.A secondary analysis of the Predicting and Preventing Post-concussive Problems in Pediatrics (5P) prospective cohort study was conducted. Individuals aged 5-18 years with acute concussion presenting to nine Canadian pediatric emergency departments (ED) were enrolled from August 2013 to June 2015. The primary outcome was the presence of headache at 7 days, measured using the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory. The association between acute administration of ibuprofen, acetaminophen, or both and headache presence at 7 days was investigated with propensity scores and adjusted multivariate regression models.2277 (74.3%) of 3063 participants had headache upon ED presentation. Of these participants, 1543 (67.8%) received an analgesic medication before or during their ED visit [ibuprofen 754 (33.1%), acetaminophen 445 (19.5%), both 344 (15.1%); or no medication 734 (32.2%)]. Multivariate analysis pertained to 1707 participants with propensity scores based on personal characteristics and symptoms; 877 (51.4%) reported headache at 7 days post-concussion. No association emerged between treatment and presence of headache at 7 days [ibuprofen vs. untreated: (relative risk (RR) = 1.12 (95% CI 0.99,1.26); acetaminophen vs untreated RR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.87,1.22); both vs untreated RR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.86,1.18)].Exposure to ibuprofen, acetaminophen, or both in the acute phase does not decrease the risk of headache at 7 days post-concussion. Non-opioid analgesics like ibuprofen or acetaminophen may be prescribed for short-term headache relief but clinicians need to be cautious with long-term medication overuse in those whose headache symptoms persist.RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Cette étude vise à déterminer si un traitement aigu à l'ibuprofène, à l'acétaminophène ou aux deux est associé à la résolution des maux de tête ou à la réduction de la douleur des maux de tête 7 jours après la commotion cérébrale chez les enfants et les adolescents. MéTHODES: Une analyse secondaire de l'étude de cohorte prospective Predicting and Preventing Post-concussive Problems in Pediatrics (5P) a été réalisée. Des personnes âgées de 5 à 18 ans souffrant d'une commotion cérébrale aiguë se présentant dans neuf services d'urgence pédiatriques (SU) canadiens ont été inscrites d'août 2013 à juin 2015. Le résultat primaire était la présence de maux de tête à 7 jours, mesurée à l'aide du Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory. L'association entre l'administration aiguë d'ibuprofène, d'acétaminophène ou des deux et la présence de maux de tête à 7 jours a été étudiée à l'aide de scores de propension et de modèles de régression multivariés ajustés. RéSULTATS: 2277 (74,3%) des 3063 participants avaient des maux de tête lors de la présentation aux urgences. Parmi ces participants, 1 543 (67,8%) ont reçu un médicament analgésique avant ou pendant leur visite aux urgences [ibuprofène 754 (33,1%), acétaminophène 445 (19,5%), les deux 344 (15,1%); ou aucun médicament 734 (32,2%)]. L'analyse multivariée a porté sur 1707 participants avec des scores de propension basés sur les caractéristiques personnelles et les symptômes; 877 (51,4%) ont signalé des maux de tête 7 jours après la commotion cérébrale. Aucune association n'est apparue entre le traitement et la présence de céphalées à 7 jours [ibuprofène vs non traité: (risque relatif (RR) = 1,12 (95%CI:0,99,1,26); acétaminophène vs non traité RR = 1,02 (95% IC: 0,87,1,22); les deux vs non traité RR = 1,02 (95% IC: 0,86,1,18)]. CONCLUSIONS: L'exposition à l'ibuprofène, à l'acétaminophène ou aux deux dans la phase aiguë ne diminue pas le risque de céphalées 7 jours après la commotion. Les analgésiques non opioïdes comme l'ibuprofène ou l'acétaminophène peuvent être prescrits pour soulager les maux de tête à court terme, mais les cliniciens doivent faire attention à la surconsommation de médicaments à long terme chez les personnes dont les symptômes de maux de tête persistent.