Search

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study is to analyze the diagnostic value of global longitudinal strain (GLS) in detecting inducible myocardial ischemia in patients with chest pain undergoing treadmill contrast-enhanced stress echocardiography (SE). Methods We retrospectively enrolled all patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography after treadmill contrast-enhanced SE. Rest and peak-stress myocardial GLS, segmental LS, and LS of 4-chamber (CH), 2-CH, and 3-CH views were reported. Luminal stenosis of more than 70% or fractional flow reserve (FFR) of

Background Patients with low HEART (History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin level) risk scores who are discharged from the emergency department (ED) may present clinical challenges and diagnostic dilemmas. The use of downstream non-invasive stress imaging (NISI) tests in this population remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the value of NISI in risk stratification and predicting cardiac events in patients with low-risk HEART scores (LRHSs).Methods We prospectively included 1384 patients with LRHSs between March 2019 and March 2021. All the patients underwent NISI (involving myocardial perfusion imaging/stress echocardiography). The primary endpoints included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and unplanned coronary revascularisation. Secondary endpoints encompassed cardiovascular-related admissions or ED visits.Results The mean patient age was 64±14 years, with 670 (48.4%) being women. During the 634±104 days of follow-up, 58 (4.2%) patients experienced 62 types of primary endpoints, while 60 (4.3%) developed secondary endpoints. Multivariable Cox models, adjusted for clinical and imaging variables, showed that diabetes (HR: 2.38; p=0.008), HEART score of 3 (HR: 1.32; p=0.01), history of coronary artery disease (HR: 2.75; p=0.003), ECG changes (HR: 5.11; p

Coronary calcification represents a significant technical challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Fortunately, a number of balloon-assisted technologies are available to aid in the management of coronary calcification before stenting. Adequate lesion preparation is crucial in the successful management of calcified coronary lesions. Balloon-based techniques can be a safe and effective method of lesion preparation and, as such, are an integral part of an interventionalist’s armamentarium. In this mini-review, we focus on the use of non-compliant balloons, super high-pressure non-compliant balloons, cutting balloons, scoring balloons and intravascular lithotripsy.

Background: We examined the frequency and risk factors associated with readmission after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with and without previous ischemic stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Methods: Hospitalizations for LAAC were identified from the US National Readmission Database, 2016-2018. The primary outcome was the first unplanned readmission after LAAC, with readmission times stratified into those occurring within 0 to 30 days vs within 31 to 180 days. Patients were stratified based on the history of previous stroke and/or TIA. Results: Of 12,901 discharges after LAAC, 28% had previous stroke and/or TIA, and 8.2% had a readmission within 30 days while 18% had a readmission within 31 to 180 days. The rates of in-hospital complications and readmissions at both periods were not significantly different between individuals with vs without previous stroke and/or TIA. Cardiac causes accounted for 28% of readmissions within 30 days and 32% of those within 31 to 180 days, and congestive failure, bleeding, and infections were the most common readmission diagnoses. New stroke and/or TIA accounted for 4% and 6% of the total noncardiac readmissions within 30 days and 31 to 180 days, respectively, and the incidence was higher among those with previous stroke and/or TIA. Female sex and index hospitalization length of stay (LOS) > 1 day were factors independently associated with readmission within 30 days, whereas LOS, diabetes, renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anemia were among the factors associated with readmissions within 31 to 180 days. Conclusions: Unplanned rehospitalizations were common after LAAC and had similar frequency for patients with vs without previous ischemic stroke and/or TIA. Female sex and index hospitalization LOS > 1 day were among the strongest factors that were independently associated with readmission within 30 days. Résumé: Contexte: Nous avons examiné la fréquence et les facteurs de risque des réadmissions consécutives à une fermeture de l'appendice auriculaire gauche (FAOG) chez les patients ayant ou non subi un accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ischémique et/ou un accident ischémique transitoire (AIT). Méthodologie: Les hospitalisations pour une FAOG ont été recensées au moyen de la US National Readmission Database (base de données nationale des réadmissions aux États-Unis) pour la période 2016-2018. Le critère d’évaluation principal était la première réadmission non prévue après une FAOG, avec stratification du moment de la réadmission selon que celle-ci était survenue de 0 à 30 jours ou de 31 à 180 jours après l’intervention. Les patients ont été stratifiés en fonction des antécédents d’AVC et/ou d’AIT. Résultats: Parmi les 12 901 patients ayant reçu leur congé de l’hôpital après une FAOG, 28 % avaient des antécédents d’AVC et/ou d’AIT; 8,2 % des patients admissibles ont été réadmis dans les 30 jours et 18 %, entre le 31e et le 180e jour suivant l’intervention. Aucune différence significative n’a été observée entre les patients ayant subi un AVC et/ou un AIT et les patients qui n’en avaient pas subi en ce qui concerne les taux de complications hospitalières et de réadmission durant ces deux périodes. Les causes cardiaques représentaient 28 % des réadmissions dans les 30 jours et 32 % des réadmissions entre le 31e et le 180e jour. L’insuffisance cardiaque congestive, les hémorragies et les infections ont été les causes les plus fréquentes de réadmission. Les nouveaux cas d’AVC et/ou d’AIT ont respectivement été à l’origine de 4 % et de 6 % de l’ensemble des réadmissions de cause non cardiaque dans les 30 jours, et entre le 31e et le 180e jour, et leur fréquence a été plus élevée chez les patients ayant des antécédents d’AVC et/ou d’AIT. Le sexe féminin et une durée d’hospitalisation initiale > 1 jour ont été des facteurs indépendants associés aux réadmissions dans les 30 jours, tandis que la durée de l’hospitalisation, un diabète, une néphropathie, une maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique et une anémie faisaient partie des facteurs associés aux réadmissions entre le 31e et le 180e jour. Conclusions: Les réhospitalisations non prévues ont été courantes après une FAOG, et leur fréquence a été similaire en présence ou en l’absence d’antécédents d’AVC ischémique et/ou d’AIT. Le sexe féminin et une durée d’hospitalisation initiale > 1 jour ont été les facteurs les plus importants associés aux réadmissions dans les 30 jours.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome with symptoms and signs that result from any structural or functional impairment of ventricular filling or ejection of blood. Limited data is available regarding the in-hospital outcomes of TAVR compared to SAVR in the octogenarian population with HF. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to compare TAVR versus SAVR among octogenarians with HF. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome included acute kidney injury (AKI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), post-procedural stroke, major bleeding, blood transfusions, sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), cardiogenic shock (CS), and mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Results: A total of 74,995 octogenarian patients with HF (TAVR-HF n = 64,890 (86.5%); SAVR n = 10,105 (13.5%)) were included. The median age of patients in TAVR-HF and SAVR-HF was 86 (83–89) and 82 (81–84) respectively. TAVR-HF had lower percentage in-hospital mortality (1.8% vs. 6.9%;p

A middle-aged woman with rheumatoid arthritis presented with treatment-refractory pericarditis. Symptoms persisted despite escalation of immunosuppression, and she had recurrent admissions for heart failure. Imaging revealed minimal pericardial effusion and a thickened pericardium. Invasive hemodynamics confirmed constrictive physiology, and a pericardiectomy was required. Pathology testing confirmed cholesterol pericarditis, a rare condition of inflammatory cholesterol deposits within the pericardium. Previous reports describe moderate-to-large volumes of gold-coloured pericardial fluid. This case illustrates that cholesterol pericarditis can present with minimal pericardial effusion and rapidly progress to pericardial constriction. Résumé: Une femme d’âge moyen atteinte d’arthrite rhumatoïde a présenté une péricardite réfractaire. Les symptômes ont persisté en dépit de l’escalade de l’immunodépression. Elle a été admise de façon répétitive en raison d’insuffisance cardiaque. L’imagerie a révélé un épanchement péricardique minimal et un péricarde épaissi. L’exploration hémodynamique invasive a permis de confirmer la physiologie constrictive. Une péricardectomie a été nécessaire. L’examen pathologique a permis de confirmer la péricardite cholestérolique, une affection inflammatoire rare due aux dépôts de cholestérol dans le péricarde. Les observations précédentes décrivent des volumes modérés à élevés de liquide péricardique doré. Ce cas illustre que la péricardite cholestérolique peut se traduire par un épanchement péricardique minimal et progresser rapidement vers la péricardite constrictive.

A 75-year-old male with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a Large (27-mm) ACURATE-neo transcatheter aortic valve, complicated by severe paravalvular leak. He developed rapid and progressive worsening heart failure. Reanalysis of the computed tomography images suggested evidence of prosthesis–annulus mismatch. Therefore, a redo transcatheter aortic valve implantation utilizing a 29-mm SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve was performed. This case illustrates the importance of proper valve sizing to avoid paravalvular leak, and how to safely cross an ACURATE-neo valve to avoid catheter entangling. Résumé: Un homme de 75 ans présentant une sténose aortique symptomatique sévère a subi l'implantation d'une valve aortique par cathéter, dont une ACURATE neo de 27-mm compliquée par une fuite paravalvulaire sévère. Par la suite, le patient a présenté une insuffisance cardiaque sévère . Une nouvelle analyse de ses examens tomodensitométriques a indiqué des signes d'incompatibilité entre la prothèse et l'anneau mitral. Il a donc fallu réaliser une nouvelle implantation valvulaire aortique par cathéter avec une valve SAPIEN 3 de 29 mm. Ce cas illustre l'importance d'une bonne évaluation de l'anneau valvulaire pour éviter les fuites paravalvulaires, et décrit comment traverser une valve ACURATE neo pour éviter l'enchevêtrement du cathéter.

Background There is a concern that resheathing/repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may lead to an increased risk of periprocedural complications. We aimed to evaluate the short‐ and long‐term impact on clinical outcomes of resheathing for repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI procedures. Methods and Results We conducted a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify studies comparing outcomes between patients requiring resheathing/repositioning during TAVI and those who did not. Random‐effects meta‐analyses were used to estimate the association of resheathing compared with no resheathing with clinical outcomes after TAVI. Seven studies including 4501 participants (pooled mean age, 80.9±7.4 years; 54% women; and 1374 [30.5%] patients requiring resheathing/repositioning) were included in this study. No significant differences between the 2 groups were identified with regards to safety: 30‐day mortality (n=3125; odds ratio [OR], 0.74 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–1.33]; I2=0%), stroke (n=4121; OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.74–1.62]; I2=0%), coronary obstruction (n=3000; OR, 2.35 [95% CI, 0.17–33.47]; I2=75%), major vascular complications (n=3125; OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.66–1.33]; I2=0%), major bleeding (n=3125; OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.94–2.01]; I2=39%), acute kidney injury (n=3495; OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.64–2.62]; I2=44%), and efficacy outcomes: device success (n=1196; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.51–1.14]; I2=0%), need for a second valve (n=3170; OR, 2.86 [95% CI, 0.96–8.48]; I2=62%), significant (moderate or higher) paravalvular leak (n=1151; OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.83–2.80]; I2=0%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (n=1908; OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.68–1.57]; I2=58%). One‐year mortality was similar between groups (n=1972; OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.68–1.47]; I2=0%). Conclusions Resheathing of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI is associated with similar periprocedural risk compared with no resheathing in several patient‐important outcomes. These data support the safety of current self‐expanding transcatheter heart valves with resheathing features. Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021273715.

Background Elderly patients have a higher burden of comorbidities that influence clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare in‐hospital outcomes in patients ≥80 years old to younger patients, and to determine the factors associated with increased risk of major adverse events (MAE) after left atrial appendage closure. Methods and Results The National Inpatient Sample was used to identify discharges after left atrial appendage closure between October 2015 and December 2018. The primary outcome was in‐hospital MAE defined as the composite of postprocedural bleeding, vascular and cardiac complications, acute kidney injury, stroke, and death. A total of 6779 hospitalizations were identified, of which, 2371 (35%) were ≥80 years old and 4408 (65%) were

Background Well‐conducted meta‐analyses are considered to be at the top of the evidence‐based hierarchy pyramid, with an expansion of these publications within the cardiovascular research arena. There are limited data evaluating the trends and quality of such publications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the methodological rigor and temporal trends of cardiovascular medicine‐related meta‐analyses published in the highest impact journals. Methods and Results Using the Medline database, we retrieved cardiovascular medicine‐related systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association, The British Medical Journal, Annals of Internal Medicine, Circulation, European Heart Journal, and Journal of American College of Cardiology between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018. Among 6406 original investigations published during the study period, meta‐analyses represented 422 (6.6%) articles, with an annual decline in the proportion of published meta‐analyses (8.7% in 2012 versus 4.6% in 2018, Ptrend=0.002). A substantial number of studies failed to incorporate elements of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses or Meta‐Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines (51.9%) and only a minority of studies (10.4%) were registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews). Fewer manuscripts failed to incorporate the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses or Meta‐Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology elements over time (60.2% in 2012 versus 40.0% in 2018, Ptrend

Background Contrast‐induced acute kidney injury (CI‐AKI) is a serious complication after percutaneous coronary intervention. The mainstay of CI‐AKI prevention is represented by intravenous hydration. Tailoring infusion rate to patient volume status has emerged as advantageous over fixed infusion‐rate hydration strategies. Methods and Results A systematic review and network meta‐analysis with a frequentist approach were conducted. A total of 8 randomized controlled trials comprising 2312 patients comparing fixed versus tailored hydration strategies to prevent CI‐AKI after percutaneous coronary intervention were included in the final analysis. Tailored hydration strategies included urine flow rate–guided, central venous pressure–guided, left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure–guided, and bioimpedance vector analysis–guided hydration. Primary endpoint was CI‐AKI incidence. Safety endpoint was incidence of pulmonary edema. Urine flow rate–guided and central venous pressure–guided hydration were associated with a lower incidence of CI‐AKI compared with fixed‐rate hydration (odds ratio [OR], 0.32 [95% CI, 0.19–0.54] and OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.21–0.97]). No significant difference in pulmonary edema incidence was observed between the different hydration strategies. P score analysis showed that urine flow rate–guided hydration is advantageous in terms of both CI‐AKI prevention and pulmonary edema incidence when compared with other approaches. Conclusions Currently available hydration strategies tailored on patients' volume status appear to offer an advantage over guideline‐supported fixed‐rate hydration for CI‐AKI prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention. Current evidence suggests that urine flow rate–guided hydration as the most convenient strategy in terms of effectiveness and safety.

Background: Accuracy of electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is important for identification of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel who recognize STEMI in the field and activate the coronary catheterization laboratory. According to previous research, there is improvement in diagnosis of STEMIs for healthcare providers who read an average of > 20 ECGs per week. This study evaluated the effectiveness of online ECG modules on improving diagnostic accuracy. Methods: EMS personnel received 25 ECGs per week to interpret via an online program. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed for improvement via completion of an ECG evaluation package before and after the intervention. Job satisfaction data were collected to determine the impact of the educational initiative. Results: A total of 64 participants completed the study. Overall, there was an improvement in ECG diagnostic accuracy from 50.8% to 61.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-13.2; P < 0.0001). Specifically, there was significant improvement in the diagnosis of STEMI (8.5%; 95% CI, 4.9-12.3; P < 0.003) and supraventricular tachycardia (39.0%; 95% CI, 17.2-60.8; P < 0.008), with a trend toward improvement in all other diagnoses. These effects were sustained to 3 months (9.6%; 95% CI, 6.4-12.7; P < 0.0001). Improvement was seen regardless of employment experience and training. There was no significant impact on job satisfaction. Conclusions: ECG exposure remains an important factor in improving the accuracy of ECG diagnosis in EMS personnel. Online education modules provide an easily accessible way of improving ECG interpretation with the opportunity for positive downstream effects on patient outcomes and resource use. Résumé: Introduction: L’interprétation de l’électrocardiogramme (ECG) doit être précise pour détecter l’infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST (STEMI) puisque le personnel des services médicaux d’urgence (SMU) doit reconnaître sur le terrain le STEMI et faire démarrer le processus vers le laboratoire de cathétérisme coronarien. Selon une étude antérieure, on note une amélioration dans le diagnostic du STEMI chez les prestataires de soins de santé qui lisent en moyenne > 20 ECG par semaine. La présente étude a permis d’évaluer l’efficacité des modules d’ECG en ligne en fonction de l’amélioration de la précision du diagnostic. Méthodes: Le personnel des SMU recevait chaque semaine 25 ECG à interpréter au moyen d’un programme en ligne. On évaluait la précision du diagnostic en fonction de son amélioration en remplissant un module d’évaluation d’ECG avant et après l’intervention. Les données sur la satisfaction professionnelle étaient collectées pour déterminer les répercussions de l’initiative éducative. Résultats: Un total de 64 participants ont complété l’étude. Dans l’ensemble, on a noté une amélioration de la précision du diagnostic à l’ECG, soit de 50,8 % à 61,2 % (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 7,7-13,2; P < 0,0001). Notamment, on a noté une amélioration importante dans le diagnostic du STEMI (8,5 %; IC à 95 %, 4,9-12,3; P < 0,003) et de la tachycardie supraventriculaire (39,0 %; IC à 95 %, 17,2-60,8; P

Cerebrovascular accidents including stroke or transient ischaemic attack are one of the most feared complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures have been consistently associated with silent ischaemic cerebral embolism as assessed by diffusion-weighted MRI. To reduce the risk of cerebrovascular accidents and silent emboli, cerebral embolic protection devices were developed with the aim of preventing procedural debris reaching the cerebral vasculature. The authors summarise the available data regarding cerebral embolic protection devices and its clinical significance.

Abstract Over the past decade, the field of valvular heart disease (VHD) has rapidly transformed, largely as a result of the development and improvement of less invasive transcatheter approaches to valve repair or replacement. This transformation has been supported by numerous well‐designed randomized trials, but they have centered almost entirely on devices and procedures. Outside this scope of focus, however, myriad aspects of therapy and management for patients with VHD have either no guidelines or recommendations based only on expert opinion and observational studies. Further, research in VHD has often failed to engage patients to inform study design and identify research questions of greatest importance and relevance from a patient perspective. Accordingly, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a Working Group on Patient‐Centered Research in Valvular Heart Disease, composed of clinician and research experts and patient advocacy experts to identify gaps and barriers to research in VHD and identify research priorities. While recognizing that important research remains to be done to test the safety and efficacy of devices and procedures to treat VHD, we intentionally focused less attention on these areas of research as they are more commonly pursued and supported by industry. Herein, we present the patient‐centered research gaps, barriers, and priorities in VHD and organized our report according to the “patient journey,” including access to care, screening and diagnosis, preprocedure therapy and management, decision making when a procedure is contemplated (clinician and patient perspectives), and postprocedure therapy and management. It is hoped that this report will foster collaboration among diverse stakeholders and highlight for funding bodies the pressing patient‐centered research gaps, opportunities, and priorities in VHD in order to produce impactful patient‐centered research that will inform and improve patient‐centered policy and care.

BackgroundRecent recommendations suggest that in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation and coexistent significant coronary artery disease, the latter should be treated before the index procedure; however, the evidence basis for such an approach remains limited. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to study the clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease who did or did not undergo revascularization prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods and ResultsWe conducted a search of Medline and Embase to identify studies evaluating patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with or without percutaneous coronary intervention. Random‐effects meta‐analyses with the inverse variance method were used to estimate the rate and risk of adverse outcomes. Nine studies involving 3858 participants were included in the meta‐analysis. Patients who underwent revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention had a higher rate of major vascular complications (odd ratio [OR]: 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33–2.60; P=0.0003) and higher 30‐day mortality (OR: 1.42; 95% CI, 1.08–1.87; P=0.01). There were no differences in effect estimates for 30‐day cardiovascular mortality (OR: 1.03; 95% CI, 0.35–2.99), myocardial infarction (OR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.14–5.28), acute kidney injury (OR: 0.89; 95% CI, 0.42–1.88), stroke (OR: 1.07; 95% CI, 0.38–2.97), or 1‐year mortality (OR: 1.05; 95% CI, 0.71–1.56). The timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (same setting versus a priori) did not negatively influence outcomes. ConclusionsOur analysis suggests that revascularization before transcatheter aortic valve implantation confers no clinical advantage with respect to several patient‐important clinical outcomes and may be associated with an increased risk of major vascular complications and 30‐day mortality. In the absence of definitive evidence, careful evaluation of patients on an individual basis is of paramount importance to identify patients who might benefit from elective revascularization.

BackgroundAortic valve predilation with balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is recommended before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), despite limited data around the requirement of this preprocedural step and the potential risks of embolization. This study aimed to investigate the trends in practice and associations of BAV on short‐term outcomes in the UK TAVI registry. Methods and ResultsEleven clinical endpoints were investigated, including 30‐day mortality, myocardial infarction, aortic regurgitation, valve dysfunction, and composite early safety. All endpoints were defined as per the VARC‐2 definitions. Odd ratios of each endpoint were estimated using logistic regression, with data analyzed in balloon‐ and self‐expandable valve subgroups. Propensity scores were calculated using patient demographics and procedural variables, which were included in the models of each endpoint to adjust for measured confounding. Between 2007 and 2014, 5887 patients met the study inclusion criteria, 1421 (24.1%) of whom had no BAV before TAVI valve deployment. We observed heterogeneity in the use of BAV nationally, both temporally and by center experience; rates of BAV in pre‐TAVI workup varied between 30% and 97% across TAVI centers. All endpoints were similar between treatment groups in SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, CA) valve patients. After correction for multiple testing, none of the endpoints in CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) patients were significantly different between patients with or without predilation. ConclusionsPerforming TAVI without predilation was not associated with adverse short‐term outcomes post procedure, especially when using a balloon‐expandable prosthesis. Randomized trials including different valve types are required to provide conclusive evidence regarding the utility of predilation before‐TAVI.

BackgroundRadial artery occlusion is a known complication following transradial cardiac catheterization. A shorter duration of postprocedural radial clamp time may reduce radial artery occlusion (RAO) but might be associated with incomplete hemostasis. Methods and ResultsIn total, 568 patients undergoing transradial diagnostic cardiac catheterization were randomly assigned to either 20 minutes (ultrashort) or 60 minutes (short) hemostatic compression time using patent hemostasis. Subsequently, clamp pressure was reduced gradually over 20 minutes. Access site hemostasis and RAO were assessed after clamp removal. Repeated assessment of RAO was determined at 1 week in 210 (37%) patients. Mean age was 64±11 years, and 30% were female. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 161 patients. RAO immediately after clamp removal was documented in 14 (4.9%) and 8 (2.8%) patients in the 20‐ and 60‐minute clamp application groups, respectively (P=0.19). The incidence of grade 1 hematoma was higher in the 20‐minute group (6.7% versus 2.5%, P=0.015). RAO at 1 week after the procedure was 2.9% and 0.9% in the 20‐ and 60‐minute groups, respectively (P=0.36). Requirement for clamp retightening (36% versus 16%, P=0.01) was higher among patients who had RAO. Need for clamp retightening was the only independent predictor of RAO (P=0.04). ConclusionsUltrashort radial clamp application of 20 minutes is not preferable to a short duration of 60 minutes. The 60‐minute clamp duration is safe and provides good access site hemostasis with low RAO rates. Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02269722.

BackgroundUp to half of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention have multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) with conflicting data regarding optimal revascularization strategy in such patients. This paper assesses the evidence for complete revascularization (CR) versus incomplete revascularization in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, and its prognostic impact using meta‐analysis. Methods and ResultsA search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Current Contents Connect, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, Science Direct, and Web of Science was conducted to identify the association of CR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with major adverse cardiac events and mortality. Random‐effects meta‐analysis was used to estimate the odds of adverse outcomes. Meta‐regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship with continuous variables and outcomes. Thirty‐eight publications that included 156 240 patients were identified. Odds of death (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61‐0.78), repeat revascularization (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45‐0.80), myocardial infarction (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50‐0.81), and major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50‐0.79) were significantly lower in the patients who underwent CR. These outcomes were unchanged on subgroup analysis regardless of the definition of CR. Similar findings were recorded when CR was studied in the chronic total occlusion (CTO) subgroup (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53‐0.80). A meta‐regression analysis revealed a negative relationship between the OR for mortality and the percentage of CR. ConclusionCR is associated with reduced risk of mortality and major adverse cardiac events, irrespective of whether an anatomical or a score‐based definition of incomplete revascularization is used, and this magnitude of risk relates to degree of CR. These results have important implications for the interventional management of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

BackgroundPreimplantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is considered a routine procedure during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to facilitate prosthesis implantation and expansion; however, it has been speculated that fewer embolic events and/or less hemodynamic instability may occur if TAVI is performed without preimplantation BAV. The aim of this study was to systematically review the clinical outcomes associated with TAVI undertaken without preimplantation BAV. Methods and ResultsWe conducted a search of Medline and Embase to identify studies that evaluated patients who underwent TAVI with or without preimplantation BAV for predilation. Pooled analysis and random‐effects meta‐analyses were used to estimate the rate and risk of adverse outcomes. Sixteen studies involving 1395 patients (674 with and 721 without preimplantation BAV) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Crude device success was achieved in 94% (1311 of 1395), and 30‐day all‐cause mortality occurred in 6% (72 of 1282) of patients. Meta‐analyses evaluating outcomes of strategies with and without preimplantation BAV showed no statistically significant differences in terms of mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.32–1.14, P=0.12), safety composite end point (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.62–1.18, P=0.34), moderate to severe paravalvular leaks (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.23–1.99, P=0.48), need for postdilation (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66–1.13, P=0.58), stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.30–1.71, P=0.45), and permanent pacemaker implantation (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.49–1.30, P=0.37). ConclusionsOur analysis suggests that TAVI procedures with or without preimplantation BAV were associated with similar outcomes for a number of clinically relevant end points. Further studies including a large number of patients are needed to ascertain the impact of TAVI without preimplantation BAV as a standard practice.