Search

Aim: To determine the factors related with the perception of feeling safe during pre-hospital emergency care., Methods: A multi-centred, cross-sectional study. Data collection from April 2021 to March 2022, in the Centro de Emergencias Sanitarias 061 (Andalusia, Spain)., Inclusion Criteria: witnesses of health care by emergency medical services., Exclusion Criteria: minors, or communication barriers., Outcome Variable: Witness Perceived Safety Scale ESPT10. The variables studied were related with sociodemographic data, the request for health care, the patient, the hospital transfer and patient safety incidents. A multivariate linear regression model was constructed for the dependent variable. The study followed STROBE statement., Results: Responses were obtained from 1400 witnesses. The linear regression model showed that the score on the scale increased as the witnesses felt more satisfied (B = 1.302; p < 0.001). On the contrary, the score was lower when the witness reported a patient safety incident (B = -2.856; p < 0.001 and B = -3.166; p < 0.001), or when the assistance took place in a public space (B = -0.722; p = 0.017)., Conclusions: The level of satisfaction, the occurrence of a patient safety incident, and the place of health care are related factors with the perception of the witnesses. The Witness Perceived Safety Scale ESPT10 could be considered a valid and useful patient safety indicator., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To identify factors related to patients' feeling of safety during prehospital emergencies., Material and Methods: Descriptive, multicenter cross-sectional study in the context of "061" emergency response services of Andalusia, Spain. Data were collected from April 2021 to March 2022. Patients attended and transported by emergency responders were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they were minors or in an altered state of consciousness, or had cognitive impairment or any barrier to communication. We calculated that a minimum sample size of 644 patients would be required. The outcome variable was the score on a 16-item scale of patient-perceived safety (ESP16, as abbreviated in Spanish). Sociodemographic, emergency service response, patient, and hospital transfer variables were studied in relation to ESP16 score. We also collected patient safety incident reports. Multivariate linear regression was used to analyze associations between the independent variables and the dependent outcome variable. Guidelines for Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) were followed., Results: We received 1756 responses. The mean (SD) ESP16 score was 77.7 (5.6); the median score was 80. The β􀀃 coefficients derived from the linear regression model were as follows for the variables associated with the ESP16 score: 2.799 (P .001) for satisfaction; -6.097 (P .001) for incident reports of errors, falls, harm, or injury; -2.742 (P .001) for reports of any other incident during attendance; 2.538 (P = .001) for use of the transport protocol; 1.157 (P .001) for type of emergency transport used; 0.726 (P = .014) for a cardiology diagnosis; and 1.195 (P = .003) for pain intensity., Conclusion: Patients' perception of safety is very high, as reflected by level of satisfaction, incident reports, use of a transport protocol, means of transport used, diagnosis, and pain level.

Objective: The aim of the study was to design and validate a new tool to measure the security perceived by witnesses of patient care and hospital transfers, after requesting urgent assistance via the "061" phone number., Methods: This is a descriptive observational, cross-sectional, design, and validation study of a scale conducted by telephone interview. Witnesses of urgent assistance and transfers by prehospital emergency medical services in the province of Cadiz, in the south of Spain, were the subjects of study. A questionnaire was designed after focus groups with patients, witnesses, and professionals. It consisted of 10 items, with Likert-type answers, and a range of 0 to 50 points. In addition to basic criteria (frequency of endorsement and ability to discriminate between groups), their validity (content and construct) and reliability (stability and homogeneity) were evaluated. Stability was evaluated by test-retest and homogeneity by means of two properties: internal consistency of items (corrected item-scale correlation coefficient) and internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach α coefficient)., Results: A total of 849 questionnaires were obtained, with scores between 0 and 50 points, with an average of 47.31 (median of 50). The exploratory factor analysis detected a component that explained 61.1% of the total variance. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.933 with 95% confidence interval between 0.900 and 0.954. The corrected item-scale correlation coefficient was greater than 0.596, and the Cronbach α coefficient was 0.927 (95% confidence interval, 0.919-0.934)., Conclusions: The ESPT10 Witness Perceived Safety Scale is valid and reliable for quantifying the safety perception of witnesses of emergency assistance and transfers., Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims and Objectives: To determine the feelings of safety among patients taken to hospital after requesting urgent care, based on their experiences and those of their carers and prehospital emergency care professionals., Background: Little research has been performed into the perception of safety in prehospital emergency care settings worldwide, from either the perspective of the patients or from that of healthcare professionals., Design: Exploratory qualitative study using focus groups in Spain., Methods: The participants were patients that requested care through the emergency telephone service, their carers and the professionals of the emergency care teams. The structured sampling design was based on an intentional, nonprobability selection following pragmatic criteria. Seven groups of patients/carers and two groups of professionals were formed (65 participants). The recordings were fully transcribed before their validation and codes were assigned to ensure anonymity. The ATLAS.ti software was used for the analysis. The authors took into account the COREQ checklist for qualitative studies., Findings: Neither group provided a clear definition of the meaning of feeling safe. It appeared easier to give examples that had a positive or negative influence on their perception of feeling safe. During the analysis of the discourse, six categories were detected after grouping the related codes., Conclusions: For most of the patients' feeling of being safe or very safe arose from the perception of calmness, trust and protection. Defining the perception of safety was not easy. The factors with the greatest effect on feeling safe were related to Information and communication, Person-centred care and Professional competency, without losing sight of other factors such as Accessibility and response times of the emergency teams, Equipment and Healthcare setting., Relevance to Clinical Practice: The findings could be used as a knowledge base in future research and for implementing procedures for improving perceptions of safety among patients., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: This protocol outlines a review and qualitative study to determine the models and effectiveness of Advanced Practice Nursing developed for the health care of people over 65 years in different settings (hospital care, home care, outpatients' care, and nursing homes) and to identify the ingredients of the interventions developed by Advanced Practice Nursing in the field of geriatric care., Background: Numbers of nurses in advanced roles have increased internationally in conjunction with research to determine their effectiveness. Nevertheless, in older people, evidence of advanced practice roles remains scattered, and there is little synthesis of evidence, and therefore it is not easy to visualize the different practice models, their components, and their impact., Design: Study protocol with two phases: a systematic review and a qualitative study., Methods: First phase: Depending on comparability of studies, meta-analysis will be undertaken. If so, results will be summarized in relative and absolute measures or mean difference, depending on the type of outcome. Sensitivity and heterogeneity analyses will be performed. Second phase: a content analysis will be carried out of the interventions identified in the systematic review, and they will be contrasted with the contents of the Nursing Interventions Classification. Finally, this matching will be submitted to expert consensus using a Delphi technique. Approval from the Ethics Committee was obtained in July 2010 and funding was obtained in March 2011., Conclusion: The identification of components of Advanced Practice Nursing models and evidence of their effectiveness will contribute to designing more grounded nursing services for older people. Additionally, the categorization of Advanced Practice Nursing interventions through Nursing Interventions Classification would permit comparisons to be made between settings or between healthcare systems., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Objective: The topic of this research was to determine whether out-of-hospital emergency teams could make use of previously prepared saline solutions (SS). The objective was to discover the physical, chemical and sterility characteristics of previously prepared saline infusions stored in ambulances and ascertain how long they remained in optimum condition., Method: Randomised clinical trial, triple blind, where study units consisted of saline solutions prepared with an infusion system and a three-way valve. The duration of the study was 12 months. Six intervention groups were designed on the basis of time of exposure and location. Samples consisted of 672 units. Twelve microbiological cultures were made and the pH, density, viscosity and CINa concentration were determined. We compared hypotheses with four models of linear regression for the variables and a model of logistic regression for the variables. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant., Results: We obtained results from 669 saline solutions (98.82%). Neither multivariant analysis nor ANOVA tests showed any significant association for a power greater than 99% with regard to the physical-chemical characteristics. The model of logistic regression also did not find any significant association for sterility. Colonisation was present in 1.7% of the 8,028 cultures made and more than 5 CFU per millilitre was found in only two cases., Conclusion: There is no evidence to suggest that recently prepared saline infusion solutions are any different from a physical-chemical and sterility point of view than those exposed for 24, 48, or 72 h. It was concluded that use can be made of previously prepared saline solutions with a guarantee their stability and sterility.