Search

SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has had a significant impact on transplant activity in our country. Mortality and the risk of complications associated with COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients (KT) were expected to be higher due to their immunosuppressed condition and the frequent associated comorbidities. Since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020 we have rapidly improved our knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features and management of COVID-19 post-transplant, resulting in a better prognosis for our patients. KT units have been able to adapt their programs to this new reality, normalizing both donation and transplantation activity in our country.This manuscript presents a proposal to update the general recommendations for the prevention and treatment of infection in this highly vulnerable population such as KT. Resumen: La infección por el SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) ha supuesto un importante impacto en la actividad trasplantadora en nuestro país. Era esperable que la mortalidad y el riesgo de complicaciones asociadas a la COVID-19 en el receptor de trasplante renal (TR) fueran mayores debido a su condición de inmunosupresión y a las frecuentes comorbilidades asociadas. Desde el inicio de la pandemia en marzo del 2020 hemos mejorado rápidamente nuestro conocimiento acerca de la epidemiología, características clínicas y manejo de la COVID-19 post-trasplante, redundando en un mejor pronóstico para nuestros pacientes. Las unidades de trasplante renal han sabido adaptar sus programas a esta nueva realidad, normalizándose la actividad tanto de donación como de trasplante en nuestro país.Este manuscrito presenta una propuesta de actualización de las recomendaciones generales para la prevención y el tratamiento de la infección en esta población tan vulnerable como son los receptores de un trasplante renal.

Resumen: La infección por el SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) ha supuesto un importante impacto en la actividad trasplantadora en nuestro país. Era esperable que la mortalidad y el riesgo de complicaciones asociadas a la COVID-19 en el receptor de trasplante renal (TR) fueran mayores debido a su condición de inmunosupresión y a las frecuentes comorbilidades asociadas. Desde el inicio de la pandemia en marzo del 2020 hemos mejorado rápidamente nuestro conocimiento acerca de la epidemiología, características clínicas y manejo de la COVID-19 postrasplante, redundando en un mejor pronóstico para nuestros pacientes. Las unidades de TR han sabido adaptar sus programas a esta nueva realidad, normalizándose la actividad tanto de donación como de trasplante en nuestro país.Este manuscrito presenta una propuesta de actualización de las recomendaciones generales para la prevención y el tratamiento de la infección en esta población tan vulnerable como son los receptores de un trasplante renal. Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has had a significant impact on transplant activity in our country. Mortality and the risk of complications associated with COVID-19 in kidney transplant (KT) recipients were expected to be higher due to their immunosuppressed condition and the frequent associated comorbidities. Since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020 we have rapidly improved our knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features and management of COVID-19 post-transplant, resulting in a better prognosis for our patients. KT units have been able to adapt their programs to this new reality, normalizing both donation and transplantation activity in our country.This manuscript presents a proposal to update the general recommendations for the prevention and treatment of infection in this highly vulnerable population such as KT.

Introduction: Death with a functioning graft (DWFG) is the most frequent cause of loss of kidney transplantation (KT). Objective: To analyze the evolution of the causes of DWFG and the frequency of the types of cancer causing DWFG. Methods: Retrospective study of KT in Andalusia from 1984 to 2018. We analyzed the evolution according to eras (1984–1995; 1996–2007; 2008–2018) and according to post-transplant period (early death: first year post-KT; late death: after first year post-KT). Results: A total of 9905 KT were performed, registering 1861 DWFG. The most frequent causes were cardiovascular disease (25.1%), infections (21.5%) and cancer (19.9%).In early death we did not observe changes, and infections were always the main cause. In late death, cardiovascular death decreased (1984−1995: 35.2%, 1996−2007: 22.6%, 2008−2018: 23.9%), but infections (1984−1995: 12.5%, 1996−2007: 18.3%, 2008−2018: 19.9%) and, above all, cancer-related deaths increased (1984−1995: 21.8%, 1996–2007: 29%, 2008−2018: 26.8%) (P

Resumen: Introducción: La muerte con injerto funcionante (MCIF) es la causa más frecuente de pérdida del trasplante renal (TR). Objetivo: Analizar la evolución de las etiologías de MCIF y la frecuencia de los tipos de neoplasia causantes. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de los TR en Andalucía desde 1984 hasta 2018. Analizamos la evolución de las MCIF según etapas (1984-1995; 1996-2007; 2008-2018) y según período post-TR (muerte precoz: primer año post-TR; muerte tardía: tras el primer año post-TR). Resultados: Se realizaron 9.905 TR; se produjeron 1.861 MCIF. Las causas más frecuentes fueron enfermedad cardiovascular (25,1%), infecciones (21,5%) y neoplasias (19,9%).En las muertes precoces no observamos cambios en el tiempo; las infecciones siempre fueron la causa principal. En las tardías, desciende la muerte cardiovascular (1984-1995: 35,2%; 1996-2007: 22,6%; 2008-2018: 23,9%) y aumentan las muertes por infecciones (1984-1995: 12,5%; 1996-2007: 18,3%; 2008-2018: 19,9%) y, sobre todo, por cáncer (1984-1995: 21,8%; 1996-2007: 29%; 2008-2018: 26,8%) (p

The SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic is evolving very quickly and means a special risk for both immunosuppressed and comorbid patients. Knowledge about this growing infection is also increasing although many uncertainties remain, especially in the kidney transplant population. This manuscript presents a proposal for action with general and specific recommendations to protect and prevent infection in this vulnerable population such as kidney transplant recipients. Resumen: La pandemia por coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) está evolucionando de manera muy rápida y representa un riesgo especial en pacientes inmunodeprimidos y con comorbilidades añadidas. El conocimiento sobre esta infección emergente va también en aumento, si bien, aún sigue habiendo muchas incógnitas, sobre todo en la población con trasplante renal. Este manuscrito presenta una propuesta de actuación con recomendaciones generales y específicas para proteger y prevenir de la infección a esta población tan vulnerable como son los receptores de un trasplante renal.

Resumen: La pandemia por coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) está evolucionando de manera muy rápida y representa un riesgo especial en pacientes inmunodeprimidos y con comorbilidades añadidas. El conocimiento sobre esta infección emergente va también en aumento, si bien, aún sigue habiendo muchas incógnitas, sobre todo en la población con trasplante renal. Este manuscrito presenta una propuesta de actuación con recomendaciones generales y específicas para proteger y prevenir de la infección a esta población tan vulnerable como son los receptores de un trasplante renal. Abstract: The SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic is evolving very quickly and means a special risk for both immunosuppressed and comorbid patients. Knowledge about this growing infection is also increasing although many uncertainties remain, especially in the kidney transplant population. This manuscript presents a proposal for action with general and specific recommendations to protect and prevent infection in this vulnerable population such as kidney transplant recipients.

The impact of Covid-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 on transplanted populations under chronic immunosuppression seems to be greater than in normal population. Clinical management of the disease, particularly in those patients worsening after a cytokine storm, with or without allograft impairment and using available therapeutic approaches in the absence of specific drugs to fight against the virus, involves a major challenge for physicians. We herein provide evidence of the usefulness of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) combined with steroid pulses to successfully treat a case of Covid-19 pneumonia in a single-kidney transplanted patient with mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis requirements in the setting of a cytokine storm. A rapid decrease in the serum level of inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, MCP-1 and IL-10, as well as of acute-phase reactants such as ferritin, D-dimer and C-reactive protein was observed after the IVIG infusion and methylprednisolone bolus administration with a parallel clinical improvement and progressive allograft function recovery, allowing the patient’s final discharge 40 days after the treatment onset. The immunomodulatory effect of IVIG together with the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive potential of steroids could be an alternative strategy to treat severe cases of Covid-19 pneumonia associated with an uncontrolled inflammatory response in transplanted populations.

Background The aim of this study was to provide an overview of age, sex and primary renal disease (PRD) distribution among first kidney transplant recipients across Europe. Method The European Renal Association (ERA) Registry database was used to obtain data on patients aged 20 years or older receiving their first kidney transplant between 2010 and 2019 from 12 European countries. The numbers and percentages of recipients in each age, sex and PRD group were calculated by country, donor type and year. Results In total, 99 543 adults received a first kidney transplant. Overall, 23% of the recipients were 65 years or older, 36% were female, and 21% had glomerulonephritis and 15% diabetes mellitus as PRD. Compared with deceased donor kidney transplant recipients, living donor kidney transplant recipients were less often 65 years or older (13% versus 26%), more often had glomerulonephritis (25% versus 20%) and less often diabetes mellitus (8% versus 17%) as PRD. We found large international differences, which were most prominent for age and PRD and less prominent for sex. Over time, the largest change in recipient characteristics was observed for the percentage of recipients aged 65 years or older, increasing from 18% in 2010 to 28% in 2019 for all countries combined with a similar trend in most countries. Conclusion We observed large differences for age and PRD distribution between recipients of living and deceased donor kidneys and between European countries. Over time, the percentage of older first kidney transplant recipients increased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: We report on the development of a predictive tool that can estimate kidney transplant survival at time zero. (2) Methods: This was an observational, retrospective study including 5078 transplants. Death-censored graft and patient survivals were calculated. (3) Results: Graft loss was associated with donor age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.021, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.018–1.024, p < 0.001), uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (DCD) (HR 1.576, 95% CI 1.241–2.047, p < 0.001) and controlled DCD (HR 1.567, 95% CI 1.372–1.812, p < 0.001), panel reactive antibody percentage (HR 1.009, 95% CI 1.007–1.011, p < 0.001), and previous transplants (HR 1.494, 95% CI 1.367–1.634, p < 0.001). Patient survival was associated with recipient age (> 60 years, HR 5.507, 95% CI 4.524–6.704, p < 0.001 vs. < 40 years), donor age (HR 1.019, 95% CI 1.016–1.023, p < 0.001), dialysis vintage (HR 1.0000263, 95% CI 1.000225–1.000301, p < 0.01), and male sex (HR 1.229, 95% CI 1.135–1.332, p < 0.001). The C-statistics for graft and patient survival were 0.666 (95% CI: 0.646, 0.686) and 0.726 (95% CI: 0.710–0.742), respectively. (4) Conclusions: We developed a mobile app to estimate survival at time zero, which can guide decisions for organ allocation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objective: The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), together with other donor and recipient variables, can optimise the organ allocation process. This study aims to check the feasibility of the KDPI for a Spanish population and its predictive ability of graft and patient survival. Materials and methods: Data from 2734 kidney transplants carried out in Andalusia between January 2006 and December 2015 were studied. Cases were grouped by recipient age, categorised by KDPI quartile and both graft and patient survival were compared among groups. Results: The KDPI accurately discriminated optimal organs from suboptimal or marginal ones. For adult recipients (aged: 18–59 years) it presents a hazard ratio of 1.013 (P

Resumen: Antecedentes y objetivo: El Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), junto a otras variables del donante y receptor, puede optimizar el proceso de asignación de órganos. Este estudio tiene como objetivo comprobar la aplicabilidad del KDPI en una población española, así como su capacidad de predicción de la supervivencia del injerto y del paciente. Materiales y métodos: Se estudiaron 2.734 trasplantes renales llevados a cabo en Andalucía entre enero de 2006 y diciembre de 2015. Los casos se agruparon por edad del receptor y cuartil del KDPI y se compararon entre grupos tanto la supervivencia del injerto como la del paciente. Resultados: El KDPI discrimina con precisión los órganos óptimos de los subóptimos o marginales. Para receptores entre 18 y 59 años presenta un hazard ratio de 1,013 (p

After contextualizing the generic frameworks of nanotechnology and nanomedicine, the 2 disciplines are discussed in the field of Nephrology. The potential downside to nanonephrology is the renal clearance of nanoparticles, the use of which is ever-increasing both for nanomedicinal purposes and in nanofoods. The positive impact of nanotechnology in Nephrology is centered on the development of renal nanodiagnostics for basic renal function studies, the early diagnosis of acute kidney injury, reliable and simple follow-up of chronic kidney disease and the improvement of magnetic resonance imaging. Renal drug nanotherapies comprise an important and dual-faceted area: the protection of drugs and nephrotoxic agents (e.g. antibiotics, antiretrovirals, contrast media, etc.) on the one hand, and the development of new kidney disease medications on the other. Renal ‘nanotheranostics’ is a promising but little-studied area. The impact of nanostructured supports on renal tissue regeneration is also discussed. The article concludes with a brief analysis of the various nanonephrology perspectives. Resumen: Después de una contextualización en los marcos genéricos de la nanotecnología y la nanomedicina, se exponen las 2 connotaciones nanotecnológicas de la Nefrología. La potencial faceta negativa de la nanonefrología es el aclaramiento renal de las nanopartículas usadas con fines nanomédicos o ingeridas en los nanoalimentos, cada vez más abundantes. El impacto positivo de la nanotecnología en la Nefrología se centra en el desarrollo de nanodiagnósticos renales para estudios básicos de la función renal, diagnóstico precoz del fallo renal agudo, seguimiento fiable y simple de la enfermedad renal crónica o la mejora de las imágenes de resonancia magnética nuclear. Las nanoterapias renales con fármacos es un tema de importancia que tiene 2 connotaciones: la protección de fármacos y agentes nefrotóxicos (ej. antibióticos, retrovirales, medios de contraste, etc.) y el desarrollo de nuevos medicamentos para enfermedades renales. La nanoteragnosis renal es una línea prometedora poco desarrollada. Se explicita también el impacto de los soportes nanoestructurados en la regeneración tisular renal. El artículo finaliza con un breve análisis de las perspectivas de la nanonefrología. Keywords: Nanotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nephrology, Renal clearance, Renal nanodiagnostics, Renal nanodrugs, Renal replacement nanotechnologies, Renal tissue nanoregeneration, Palabras clave: Nanotecnología, Nanomedicina, Nefrología, Aclaramiento renal, Nanodiagnósticos renales, Nanofármacos renales, Nanotecnologías de reemplazo renal, Nanorregeneración de tejido renal

Resumen: Después de una contextualización en los marcos genéricos de la nanotecnología y la nanomedicina, se exponen las 2 connotaciones nanotecnológicas de la Nefrología. La potencial faceta negativa de la nanonefrología es el aclaramiento renal de las nanopartículas usadas con fines nanomédicos o ingeridas en los nanoalimentos, cada vez más abundantes. El impacto positivo de la nanotecnología en la Nefrología se centra en el desarrollo de nanodiagnósticos renales para estudios básicos de la función renal, diagnóstico precoz del fallo renal agudo, seguimiento fiable y simple de la enfermedad renal crónica o la mejora de las imágenes de resonancia magnética nuclear. Las nanoterapias renales con fármacos es un tema de importancia que tiene 2 connotaciones: la protección de fármacos y agentes nefrotóxicos (ej. antibióticos, retrovirales, medios de contraste, etc.) y el desarrollo de nuevos medicamentos para enfermedades renales. La nanoteragnosis renal es una línea prometedora poco desarrollada. Se explicita también el impacto de los soportes nanoestructurados en la regeneración tisular renal. El artículo finaliza con un breve análisis de las perspectivas de la nanonefrología. Abstract: After contextualising the generic frameworks of nanotechnology and nanomedicine, the 2 disciplines are discussed in the field of Nephrology. The potential downside to nanonephrology is the renal clearance of nanoparticles, the use of which is ever-increasing both for nanomedicinal purposes and in nanofoods. The positive impact of nanotechnology in Nephrology is centred on the development of renal nanodiagnostics for basic renal function studies, the early diagnosis of acute kidney injury, reliable and simple follow-up of chronic kidney disease and the improvement of magnetic resonance imaging. Renal drug nanotherapies comprise an important and dual-faceted area: The protection of drugs and nephrotoxic agents (e.g. antibiotics, antiretrovirals, contrast media, etc.) on the one hand, and the development of new kidney disease medications on the other. Renal ‘nanotheranostics’ is a promising but little-studied area. The impact of nanostructured supports on renal tissue regeneration is also discussed. The article concludes with a brief analysis of the various nanonephrology perspectives. Palabras clave: Nanotecnología, Nanomedicina, Nefrología, Aclaramiento renal, Nanodiagnósticos renales, Nanofármacos renales, Nanotecnologías de reemplazo renal, Nanorregeneración de tejido renal, Keywords: Nanotechnology, Nanomedicine, Nephrology, Renal clearance, Renal nanodiagnostics, Renal nanodrugs, Renal replacement nanotechnologies, Renal tissue nanoregeneration

In order to regulate the personal status of Moroccans with habitual residence in Spain, it is necessary in advance to analyze the four factors that determine the legal and political framework of the issue: migratory, social, technical and religious. Secondly it is required to study the changes of the Private International Law systems in Western and Muslim countries, which increase the distance between them. Finally, this work will attempt to answer the question posed at the beginning since human communion between neighbours compel host States to establish a transnational legal framework to regulate those family situations emerged and developed in this geopolitical area

Humoral alloimmunity, particularly that triggered by preformed antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA), is associated with an increased prevalence of rejection and reduced transplant survival. The high sensitivity of solid phase assays, based on microbeads coated with single antigens (SAB), consolidated them as the gold-standard method to characterize anti-HLA antibodies, ensuring a successful allograft allocation. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) provided by SAB is regularly used to stratify the immunological risk, assuming it as a reliable estimation of the antibody-level, but it is often limited by artifacts. Beyond MFI, other properties, such as the complement-binding ability or the IgG1-4 subclass profile have been examined to more accurately define the clinical relevance of antibodies and clarify their functional properties. However, there are still unresolved issues. Neat serum-samples from 20 highly-sensitized patients were analyzed by SAB-panIgG, SAB-IgG1-4 subclass and SAB-C1q assays. All 1:16 diluted serum-samples were additionally analyzed by SAB-panIgG and SAB-IgG1-4 subclass assays. A total of 1,285 anti-HLA antibodies were identified as positive, 473 (36.8%) of which were C1q-binding. As expected, serum-dilution enhanced the correlation between the C1q-binding ability and the antibody-strength, measured as the MFI (rneat = 0.248 vs. rdiluted = 0.817). SAB-subclass assay revealed at least one IgG1-4 subclass in 1,012 (78.8%) positive antibody-specificities. Among them, strong complement-binding subclasses, mainly IgG1, were particularly frequent (98.9%) and no differences were found between C1q- and non-C1q-binding antibodies regarding their presence (99.4 vs. 98.5%; p = 0.193). In contrast, weak or non-C1q-binding subclasses (IgG2/IgG4) were more commonly detected in C1q-binding antibodies (78.9 vs. 38.6%; p < 0.001). Interestingly, a strong association was found between the C1q-binding ability and the IgG1 strength (rIgG1dil = 0.796). Though lower, the correlation between the IgG2 strength and the C1q-binding ability was also strong (rIgG2dil = 0.758), being both subclasses closely related (rIgG1−IgG2 = 0.817). We did not find any correlation with the C1q-binding ability considering the remaining subclasses. In conclusion, we demonstrate that a particular profile of IgG subclasses (IgG1/IgG3) itself does not determine at all the ability to bind complement of anti-HLA antibodies assessed by SAB-C1q assay. It is the IgG subclass strength, mainly of IgG1, which usually appears in combination with IgG2, that best correlates with it.