1. The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer
- Author
-
Epstein, JI, Amin, MB, Fine, SW, Algaba, F, Aron, M, Baydar, DE, Beltran, AL, Brimo, F, Cheville, JC, Colecchia, M, Comperat, E, da Cunha, IW, Delprado, W, DeMarzo, AM, Giannico, GA, Gordetsky, JB, Guo, CC, Hansel, DE, Hirsch, MS, Huang, JT, Humphrey, PA, Jimenez, RE, Khani, F, Kong, QN, Kryvenko, ON, Kunju, LP, Lal, P, Latour, M, Lotan, T, Maclean, F, Magi-Galluzzi, C, Mehra, R, Menon, S, Miyamoto, H, Montironi, R, Netto, GJ, Nguyen, JK, Osunkoya, AO, Parwani, A, Robinson, BD, Rubin, MA, Shah, RB, So, JS, Takahashi, H, Tavora, F, Tretiakova, MS, True, L, Wobker, SE, Yang, XMJ, Zhou, M, Zynger, DL, and Trpkov, K
- Abstract
Context.-Controversies and uncertainty persist in prostate cancer grading. prostate cancer grading. Objective.-To update grading recommendations Data Sources.-Critical review of the literature along with pathology and clinician surveys. Conclusions.-Percent Gleason pattern 4 (%GP4) is as follows: (1) report %GP4 in needle biopsy with Grade Groups (GrGp) 2 and 3, and in needle biopsy on other parts (jars) of lower grade in cases with at least 1 part showing Gleason score (GS) 4 + 4 = 8; and (2) report %GP4: less than 5% or less than 10% and 10% increments thereafter. Tertiary grade patterns are as follows: (1) replace "tertiary grade pattern'' in radical prostatectomy (RP) with "minor tertiary pattern 5 (TP5),'' and only use in RP with GrGp 2 or 3 with less than 5% Gleason pattern 5; and (2) minor TP5 is noted along with the GS, with the GrGp based on the GS. Global score and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)targeted biopsies are as follows: (1) when multiple undesignated cores are taken from a single MRI-targeted lesion, an overall grade for that lesion is given as if all the involved cores were one long core; and (2) if providing a global score, when different scores are found in the standard and the MRI-targeted biopsy, give a single global score (factoring both the systematic standard and the MRI-targeted positive cores). Grade Groups are as follows: (1) Grade Groups (GrGp) is the terminology adopted by major world organizations; and (2) retain GS 3 + 5 = 8 in GrGp 4. Cribriform carcinoma is as follows: (1) report the presence or absence of cribriform glands in biopsy and RP with Gleason pattern 4 carcinoma. Intraductal carcinoma (IDCP) is as follows: (1) report IDC-P in biopsy and RP; (2) use criteria based on dense cribriform glands (>50% of the gland is composed of epithelium relative to luminal spaces) and/or solid nests and/or marked pleomorphism/necrosis; (3) it is not necessary to perform basal cell immunostains on biopsy and RP to identify IDC-P if the results would not change the overall (highest) GS/GrGp part per case; (4) do not include IDC-P in determining the final GS/GrGp on biopsy and/or RP; and (5) "atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP)'' is preferred for an intraductal proliferation of prostatic secretory cells which shows a greater degree of architectural complexity and/or cytological atypia than typical high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, yet falling short of the strict diagnostic threshold for IDC-P. Molecular testing is as follows: (1) Ki67 is not ready for routine clinical use; (2) additional studies of active surveillance cohorts are needed to establish the utility of PTEN in this setting; and (3) dedicated studies of RNA-based assays in active surveillance populations are needed to substantiate the utility of these expensive tests in this setting. Artificial intelligence and novel grading schema are as follows: (1) incorporating reactive stromal grade, percent GP4, minor tertiary GP5, and cribriform/intraductal carcinoma are not ready for adoption in current practice.
- Published
- 2021