Search

Introduction: Immune checkpoint blockade of programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor and its ligand (PD-L1) has contributed to efficacy in many tumor types, with clinical responses observed in a proportion of patients (pts) with Hodgkin lymphoma and rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. A recent study demonstrated that combination treatment with anti-PD-L1 and anti-CD38 agents contributed to a stronger anti-tumor immune response compared with anti-PD-L1 monotherapy. Isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, is approved for use in multiple myeloma. Cemiplimab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for use in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: This Phase 1/2 open-label study (NCT03769181) was designed to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab (Isa+Cemi) in pts with relapsed and refractory classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). The primary objectives of Phase 1 were to characterize the safety and tolerability of Isa+Cemi and to confirm the recommended Phase 2 dose. Phase 2 used a Simon's 2-stage design to assess the complete response rate in Cohort A1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 naïve cHL; n=18; median age, 36 years; 55.6% male; ≥2 prior regimens, 100%) and to assess the objective response rate in Cohorts A2 (cHL progressing after PD-1/PD-L1 therapy; n=12; median age, 33 years; 58.3% male; ≥2 prior regimens, 100%), B (DLBCL; n=17; median age, 64 years; 70.6% male; ≥2 prior regimens, 100%), and C (PTCL; n=11; median age, 69 years; 63.6% male; ≥2 prior regimens, 9.1%). Pts received Isa+Cemi for up to 96 weeks. In Phase 1, the isatuximab dose was 10 mg/kg every week (Cycle 1), every 2 weeks (Cycle 2-6), or every 3 weeks (Cycle 7+). The cemiplimab dose was 250 mg every 2 weeks (Cycle 1-6) or 350 mg every 3 weeks (Cycle 7+). An interim analysis was performed when the last pt in Phase 2 was followed up for 24 weeks. The efficacy evaluation was based on Simon's 2-stage design with 85% power at a 5% 1-sided alpha level for each cohort. At least 8 (44.4%) and 3 (30.0%) responses were required in Cohorts B and C, respectively, in Phase 2 Stage 1 to advance to Phase 2 Stage 2. Results: Isa+Cemi demonstrated a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, confirming the recommended Phase 2 dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 83.3% (Cohort A1) and 100% (Cohorts A2, B, C) of pts. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 5.6%, 8.3%, 70.6%, and 81.8% of pts in Cohorts A1, A2, B, and C, respectively. There were no pts in Cohorts A1 or A2 who reported TEAEs leading to definitive discontinuation; 5.9% and 27.3% of pts in Cohorts B and C experienced TEAEs leading to definitive discontinuation. No Grade 5 TEAEs with fatal outcome were reported in Cohorts A1 or A2. There were 4 deaths reported during the on-treatment period in Cohort B (progressive disease, n=2; intestinal perforation, n=1; urinary tract infection, n=1) and 2 in Cohort C (unknown, n=1; progressive disease, n=1). Infusion reactions were reported in 38.9%, 75.0%, 52.9%, and 72.7% of pts in Cohorts A1, A2, B, and C, respectively; there was 1 (9.1%) Grade ≥3 infusion reaction reported in Cohort C. Pharmacokinetics (PK) analyses suggested no effect of cemiplimab on isatuximab PK, and vice versa. Based on Lugano 2014 criteria, 55.6% (Cohort A1), 33.3% (Cohort A2), 5.9% (Cohort B), and 9.1% (Cohort C) of pts in the all-treated population achieved a complete or partial response. Median progression-free survival was 8.38 months (95% CI: 2.72-not calculable [NC]), 8.28 months (95% CI: 2.6-NC), 2.37 months (95% CI: 0.46-2.69), and 2.66 months (95% CI: 0.43-2.99) in Cohorts A1, A2, B, and C, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, Isa+Cemi had a manageable safety profile. Clinical efficacy was observed in pts with cHL, with increased responses observed in pts who had not previously received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy compared with those who progressed on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. For Cohorts B (DLBCL) and C (PTCL), results of the interim efficacy analysis did not meet prespecified criteria to continue enrollment in Phase 2 Stage 2. Most pts with DLBCL were primary refractory/bulky and discontinued rapidly, which may have contributed to the lack of activity with this combination. Disclosures Carlo-Stella: ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Zinzani: TG Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ImmuneDesign: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Sureda: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; Bluebird: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Casasnovas: TAKEDA: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; ROCHE: Consultancy, Research Funding. Carpio: Regeneron, TAKEDA, Celgene, Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travels and accommodation. Bouabdallah: Abbvie: Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses. Cartron: Roche, Celgene-BMS: Consultancy; Danofi, Gilead, Novartis, Jansen, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Abbvie, Takeda: Honoraria. Kim: Celltrion: Research Funding; Dong-A Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Cordoba: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ADCTherapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Koh: Pfizer: Consultancy; Jassen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Alves: Janssen, Cilag, Gilead, Takeda, Astrazeneca, Roche, Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chamuleau: Gilead: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lopez-Guillermo: Roche, Gilead/Kite, Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, AbbVie, Spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Van Der Poel: Roche, Janssen, Abbvie: Honoraria. Abbadessa: Sanofi: Current Employment. Meng: Sanofi: Current Employment. Ji: Sanofi: Current Employment. Lepine: Sanofi: Other: Contractual relationship. Saleem: Sanofi: Current Employment. Ribrag: PharmaMar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Research Funding; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argen-X: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Based on the Phase III ICARIA-MM study, isatuximab (Sarclisa) is approved in a number of countries in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. Based on the Phase III IKEMA study, isatuximab in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone is approved in the United States for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one to three prior lines of therapy, and in the European Union for the treatment of adult patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy. Cemiplimab (Libtayo) is an anti-PD-1 antibody approved for the treatment of the following: 1) patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma who are not candidates for curative surgery or curative radiation; 2) patients with locally advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma previously treated with a hedgehog pathway inhibitor or for whom a hedgehog pathway inhibitor is not appropriate; and 3) patients with NSCLC and high tumor PD-L1 expression as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 aberrations, and is locally advanced where patients are not candidates for surgical resection or definitive chemoradiation or metastatic.

Background: SAR’245 is a clinical-stage site-specific pegylated human IL-2 that blocks IL-2 alpha receptor binding but retains near-native binding affinity for beta/gamma IL-2 receptor subunits. When administered in preclinical models, a unique ‘T-cell remodeling’ MoA characterized by robust increase of CD8+Teff/CD4+Treg coupled with potent NK-cell activation/expansion was observed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be used as a non-invasive biomarker of early clinical response whilst overcoming challenges of obtaining repeat tumor biopsies from patients. Previously, we reported results of the Phase 1 HAMMER study (NCT04009681); herein, we describe an innovative integrative approach that considers peripheral key MoA biomarkers with objective response and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate to help identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for SAR’245. Methods: SAR’245 was given IV as mono Q3W [Cohort B] or Q3W + IV pembro 200 mg Q3W/400 mg Q6W [Cohort C]. Joint modeling was carried out to account for the relationship between dose and 1) MoA biomarkers, and NK cells in blood measured by flow cytometry; 2) response surrogate biomarker: ctDNA measured by Guardant Omni 500 panel; and 3) DLTs. In the model, a latent variable was used to model correlation between DLT and the MoA or response surrogate biomarkers, Bayesian approach was used to derive posterior probabilities (PP) at each dose level of the target region (defined by >20% probability of fold change of biomarker values post-treatment above a predefined threshold and DLT rate Results: Samples from 35 subjects (Cohort B) and 34 subjects (Cohort C) were available. The results from SAR’245 mono suggests that the CD8/CD4 ratio and the concentrations of NK, CD8, and CD4 achieve maximum probability of reaching meaningful modulation (based on pre-defined threshold) around 32 ug/kg. When SAR’245 was combined with pembro, the results with PoM biomarkers showed the best performance at 24-32 µg/kg, while results with ctDNA showed the best results at 16-24 µg/kg. When all parameters were considered, either 24 or 32 µg/kg could serve as an adequate dose at Q3W scheduling. Conclusions: In early oncology studies, joint modeling using non-invasive biomarkers, including MoA and response biomarkers, and a safety profile can inform dose-response relationships and support RP2D selection. This innovative integrative modeling will guide clinical study design. Studies of SAR’245 that further explore the dosing and scheduling are on-going. Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Synthorx, a Sanofi company. Citation Format: Siqing Fu, Gerald S. Falchook, Minal Barve, Meredith McKean, Tira J. Tan, Charlotte Lemech, Cheng E. Chee, Neyssa Marina, Giovanni Abbadessa, Robin Meng, Federico Rotolo, Hong Wang, Jason Deng, Wenting Wang, Rui Wang, Tarek Meniawy. Joint modeling of safety and peripheral mode-of-action (MoA) biomarkers to support RP2D identification in Phase 1 study of SAR444245 (SAR’245) as monotherapy (mono) or combined with pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2155.

SAR444245 (formerly THOR-707) is a site-specific pegylated recombinant human IL-2 molecule which blocks IL-2R alpha-binding while retains near-native affinity for beta/gamma IL-2 receptor subunits. SAR444245 reduces B16-F10 tumor proliferation in C57BL/6 mice and induces a short transient migration of CD8+ T and NK cells from peripheral blood to lymphoid organs before a strong proliferation (Ptacin et al, Nat Commun 2021). Here we report CD8+ T cells imaging post SAR444245 as monotherapy in naive and tumor bearing mice using nuclear imaging. An anti-murine CD8+ PET probe was injected in mice 24 hours post SAR444245 administration and nuclear imaging was performed at different times over 6 days. In C57BL/6 naive and in poorly immunogenic B16-F10 tumor bearing animals, images reveal a decreased Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) within blood in treated animals at 3mg/kg compared to control ones. In parallel, blood SUV Ratio (SUVR) increases within spleen, lymph nodes and thymus after SAR444245 injection compared to control mice. On tumor site, a stronger SUVR is measured at 144 hours post injection in SAR444245 treated group than in the control group. A dose escalation ranging from 1 to 6 mg/kg of SAR444245 was performed in highly immunogenic CT26 tumor bearing animal. Blood SUV decreases in the treated groups compared to the control group. In lymphoid organs, all SUVR increase at 144 hours post injection in the treated groups compared to the control one. In CT26 tumors, a slight increase of the SUVR is observed for groups treated at 3 and 6 mg/kg. In parallel, a pronounced reduction of tumor growth is observed in the treated group at 6mg/kg. These studies non-invasively confirm the mode of action of SAR444245 with a rapid relocation of CD8+ T cells from peripheral blood to lymphoid organs and tumor site. Citation Format: Sebastion d'Heilly, Fabrice Tirode, Maxime Gaulin, Dudzicki Anne, Guillaume Bluet, Stéphane Guerif, Francis Descamps, Peter Casteels, Xiangming Li, Rui Wang, Robin Meng, Erwan Jouannot. Noninvasive immuno-PET imaging of CD8+T cell behavior in tumor bearing mice models treated with SAR444245. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3580.

BackgroundPreclinical data suggest that concurrent treatment of anti-CD38 and antiprogrammed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies substantially reduce primary tumor growth by reversing T-cell exhaustion and thus enhancing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy.MethodsThis phase I/II study enrolled patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objectives of phase I were to investigate the safety and tolerability of isatuximab (anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody)+cemiplimab (anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, Isa+Cemi) in patients with mCRPC (naïve to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy) or NSCLC (progressed on anti-PD-1/PD-L1-containing therapy). Phase II used Simon’s two-stage design with response rate as the primary endpoint. An interim analysis was planned after the first 24 (mCRPC) and 20 (NSCLC) patients receiving Isa+Cemi were enrolled in phase II. Safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity were assessed, including CD38, PD-L1, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment (TME), and peripheral immune cell phenotyping.ResultsIsa+Cemi demonstrated a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals. All patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event. Grade≥3 events occurred in 13 (54.2%) patients with mCRPC and 12 (60.0%) patients with NSCLC. Based on PCWG3 criteria, assessment of best overall response with Isa+Cemi in mCRPC revealed no complete responses (CRs), one (4.2%) unconfirmed partial response (PR), and five (20.8%) patients with stable disease (SD). Per RECIST V.1.1, patients with NSCLC receiving Isa+Cemi achieved no CR or PR, and 13 (65%) achieved SD. In post-therapy biopsies obtained from patients with mCRPC or NSCLC, Isa+Cemi treatment resulted in a reduction in median CD38+ tumor-infiltrating immune cells from 40% to 3%, with no consistent modulation of PD-L1 on tumor cells or T regulatory cells in the TME. The combination triggered a significant increase in peripheral activated and cytolytic T cells but, interestingly, decreased natural killer cells.ConclusionsThe present study suggests that CD38 and PD-1 modulation by Isa+Cemi has a manageable safety profile, reduces CD38+ immune cells in the TME, and activates peripheral T cells; however, such CD38 inhibition was not associated with significant antitumor activity. A lack of efficacy was observed in these small cohorts of patients with mCRPC or NSCLC.Trial registration numbersNCT03367819.

BackgroundSAR444245 (THOR-707) is a recombinant human IL-2 molecule that includes a PEG moiety irreversibly bound to a novel amino acid via click chemistry to block the alpha-binding domain while retaining near-native affinity for the beta/gamma subunits. In animal models, SAR444245 showed anti-tumor benefits, but with no severe side effects, both as single agent and when combined with anti-PD1 comparing with historical data from aldeslukin. Preclinical study demonstrated SAR444245 enhances ADCC function of cetuximab. The HAMMER trial, which is the FIH study shows preliminary encouraging clinical results: initial efficacy and safety profile with SAR444245 monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab or with cetuximab support a non-alpha preferential activity, validating preclinical models. The Pegasus Head and Neck Ph 2 study will evaluate the clinical benefit of SAR444245 in combination with other anticancer therapies for the treatment of patients with R/M HNSCC.MethodsThe Pegasus Head and Neck will enroll approximately 272 patients in 4 separate cohorts concurrently. In cohorts A1 & A2, 1L R/M HNSCC patients will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab, or SAR444245+ pembrolizumab+ cetuximab respectively. In cohort B1 & B2 patients with 2/3L R/M HNSCC failed a checkpoint based regimen & a platinum containing regimen will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab, or SAR444245 + cetuximab. Patients to be enrolled in cohort B2 need to be cetuximab-naïve in R/M setting. SAR444245 is administered intravenously IV at a dose of 24 ug/kg Q3W until disease progression (PD) or completion of 35 cycles. Pembrolizumab is administered at a dose of 200 mg Q3W until PD or completion of 35 cycles. Cetuximab is administered at a dose of 400/250 mg/m2 QW until PD. The study primary objective is to determine the antitumor activity of SAR444245 in combination with other anticancer therapies. Secondary objectives include confirmation of dose and safety profile, assess other indicators of antitumor activity, and assess the pharmacokinetic profile and immunogenicity of SAR444245. The study will be conducted in the US, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, South Korea, Spain and Taiwan.AcknowledgementsThe Pegasus Head and Neck study is sponsored by Sanofi.

BACKGROUND This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in Chinese patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Adults (ages 18-75 years) with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in first or second complete or partial remission, without previous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization or autologous transplant, were included. Patients received granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor 10 µg/kg/day from Days 1 through 4 before they were randomized (1:1) to receive either plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg/day or placebo subcutaneously on Days 4 through 7 plus continued granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor on Days 5 through 8. Apheresis began on Day 5 and continued for no more than 4 days. The primary endpoint was collection of 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg or greater over no more than 4 days of apheresis. Other endpoints included the collection of 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg or greater and safety. RESULTS Overall, 101 patients were enrolled, and 50 were randomized to each group. More patients in the plerixafor group achieved 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg or greater (62 vs. 20%; p

BackgroundSAR444245 (THOR-707) is a recombinant human IL-2 molecule that includes a PEG moiety irreversibly bound to a novel amino acid via click chemistry to block the alpha-binding domain while retaining near-native affinity for the beta/gamma subunits. In animal models, SAR444245 showed anti-tumor benefits, but with no severe side effects, both as single agent and when combined with anti-PD1 comparing with historical data from aldesleukin. The HAMMER trial, which is the FIH study shows preliminary encouraging clinical results: initial efficacy and safety profile with SAR444245 monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab support a non-alpha preferential activity, validating preclinical models. The Pegasus Lung Ph2 study will evaluate the clinical benefit of SAR444245 in combination with other anticancer therapies for the treatment of patients with lung cancer or pleural mesotheliomaMethodsThe Pegasus Lung (NCT04914897) will enroll approximately 354 patients in 6 separate cohorts concurrently or sequentially. In cohorts A1 & A2, patients with first line (L) NSCLC will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab. In cohort A3, patients with 1L non-squamous NSCLC will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + carboplatin/cisplatin. In cohort B1 & B2 patients with 2/3L NSCLC who have progressed on a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based therapy will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab, or SAR444245 + pembrolizumab + nab-paclitaxel. In cohort C patients with 2/3L CPI naïve mesothelioma will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab. SAR444245 is administered IV at a dose of 24 ug/kg Q3W in an outpatient setting until disease progression or completion of 35 cycles. Pembrolizumab is administered at a dose of 200 mg Q3W until PD or completion of 35 cycles. The study primary objective is to determine the antitumor activity of SAR444245 in combination with other anticancer therapies. Secondary objectives include confirmation of dose and safety profile, assess other indicators of antitumor activity, and assess the pharmacokinetic profile and immunogenicity of SAR444245. The study will be conducted in the US, Australia, France, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Korea, Spain, and Taiwan.AcknowledgementsThe Pegasus Lung study is sponsored by Sanofi.Trial RegistrationNCT04914897Ethics ApprovalThis study has been approved by applicable ethics committees or institutional review boards. All participants gave informed consent before taking part.ConsentWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Background: CD38 is implicated in noncanonical adenosine synthesis and its overexpression on tumor cells has been implicated in T-cell exhaustion and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Preclinical data suggest that concurrent treatment of anti-CD38 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies substantially reduce primary tumor growth via suppressing acquired resistance to immune checkpoint blockade, and thus enhancing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy. Methods: This Phase 1/2 study (NCT03367819) enrolled pts with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objectives of Phase 1 were safety and tolerability of Isa (anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody) + Cemi (anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in pts with mCRPC (naïve to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy) or NSCLC (progressed on anti-PD-1/PD-L1-containing therapy). Phase 2 used a Simon's 2-stage design with response rate (RR) as the primary endpoint. An interim analysis was planned after the first 24 (mCRPC) and 20 (NSCLC) pts receiving Isa+Cemi were enrolled in Phase 2. Tolerability, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity were assessed, including CD38, PD-L1, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment (TME), and peripheral immune cell phenotyping. Results: Isa+Cemi demonstrated a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals. All pts experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event. Grade ≥3 events occurred in 13 (54.2%) mCRPC pts and 12 (60.0%) NSCLC pts. Based on PCWG3 criteria, assessment of best overall response (BOR) with Isa+Cemi in mCRPC revealed no complete responses (CR), 1 unconfirmed partial response (PR) (4.2%), and 5 (20.8%) pts with stable disease (SD). Per RECIST 1.1, NSCLC pts receiving Isa+Cemi achieved no CR or PR, and 13 (65%) achieved SD. Isa+Cemi resulted in ~40% reduction in CD38+ tumor-infiltrating immune cells in post-therapy biopsies. The combination triggered a significant increase in peripheral activated and cytolytic T cells, but decreased NK cells. In addition, low baseline CD38 levels on tumor cells were observed in NSCLC pts who progressed on prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment. No significant modulation of Tregs or PD-L1 in the TME or CD38 expression on tumor cells was observed. Conclusions: The present study suggests that CD38 and PD-1 modulation by Isa+Cemi has a manageable safety profile, reduces CD38+ immune cells in the TME, and activates peripheral T cells; however, this was not associated with significant antitumor activity in these small cohorts of mCRPC and NSCLC pts. Citation Format: Chia-Chi Lin, Paolo Zucali, Bradley Carthon, Todd M. Bauer, Marcello Tucci, Antoine Italiano, Roberto Iacovelli, Wu-Chou Su, Christophe Massard, Monsoor Saleh, Gennaro Daniele, Alastair Greystoke, Martin Gutierrez, Shubham Pant, Ying-Chun Shen, Matteo Perrino, Robin Meng, Giovanni Abbadessa, Helen Lee, Yingwen Dong, Marielle Chiron, Rui Wang, Laure Loumagne, Johann de Bono, Johann de Bono. Targeting CD38 and PD-1 with isatuximab (Isa) plus cemiplimab (Cemi) in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies: Results from a Phase 1/2 open-label, multicenter study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB040.

This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in Chinese patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Adults (ages 18-75 years) with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in first or second complete or partial remission, without previous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization or autologous transplant, were included. Patients received granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor 10 µg/kg/day from Days 1 through 4 before they were randomized (1:1) to receive either plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg/day or placebo subcutaneously on Days 4 through 7 plus continued granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor on Days 5 through 8. Apheresis began on Day 5 and continued for no more than 4 days. The primary endpoint was collection of 5 × 10Overall, 101 patients were enrolled, and 50 were randomized to each group. More patients in the plerixafor group achieved 5 × 10Plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor is superior to placebo plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for the mobilization of CD34+ cells for autologous transplantation and is generally well tolerated in Chinese patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

CD38 is a transmembrane glycoprotein with ectoenzymatic activity involved in regulation of migration, signal transduction, and receptor-mediated adhesion. CD38 is highly expressed on various malignant cells, including multiple myeloma (MM), and at relatively low levels in other tissues, making it a suitable target for therapeutic antibodies. Several anti-CD38 therapies have been, or are being, developed for the treatment of MM, including daratumumab and isatuximab (SAR650984), respectively. Studies have shown that anti-CD38 therapies are effective in the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM and are well tolerated, with infusion reactions being the most common side effects. They can be used as monotherapy or in combination with immunomodulatory agents, such as pomalidomide, or proteasome inhibitors to potentiate their activity. Here we examine isatuximab and several anti-CD38 agents in development that were generated using new antibody engineering techniques and that may lead to more effective CD38 targeting. We also summarize trials assessing these antibodies in MM, other malignancies, and solid organ transplantation. Finally, we propose that further research on the mechanisms of resistance to anti-CD38 therapy and the development of biomarkers and new backbone regimens with CD38 antibodies will be important steps in building more personalized treatment for patients with MM.