Search

The frequency of thrombosis in AML has been evaluated only in a few studies and no validated predictive model is currently available. Recently, DIC score was shown to identify patients at higher thrombotic risk. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of thromboembolism in AML patients treated with intensive chemotherapy and to assess the ability of genetic and clinical factors to predict the thrombotic risk. We performed a retrospective observational study including 222 newly diagnosed adult AML (210) and high-risk MDS (12), treated with intensive chemotherapy between January 2013 and February 2020. With a median follow-up of 44 months, we observed 50 thrombotic events (90% were venous, VTE). The prevalence of thrombosis was 22.1% and the 6-months cumulative incidence of thrombosis was 10%. The median time to thrombosis was 84 days and 52% of the events occurred within 100 days from AML diagnosis. Khorana and DIC score failed to stratify patients according to their thrombotic risk. Only history of a thrombotic event (p = 0.043), particularly VTE (p = 0.0053), platelet count above 100 × 10

Extramedullary relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is not a rare event, and the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation is a well-known risk factor. Gilteritinib is approved for relapsed/refractory FLT3+ AML, but its efficacy in extramedullary relapse is still undefined. Here, we present the case of a 69-year-old woman with therapy-related nucleophosmin-1 and FLT3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) positive AML treated with induction and consolidation with CPX-351 (liposomal daunorubicin plus cytarabine) followed by off-label azacitidine maintenance who obtained a complete remission (CR) with persistent measurable residual disease. After 19 months of CR, she experienced an isolated breast relapse of FLT3-ITD+ AML. She was started on single-agent gilteritinib, resulting in a rapid and persistent complete regression of the breast nodule. Targeted therapy with gilteritinib for relapsed/refractory FLT3-ITD+ AML can be effective in isolated extramedullary relapse.

The efficacy of early treatment with convalescent plasma in patients with COVID-19 is debated. Nothing is known about the potential effect of other plasma components other than anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.To determine whether convalescent or standard plasma would improve outcomes for adults in early phase of Covid19 respiratory impairment we designed this randomized, three-arms, clinical trial (PLACO COVID) blinded on interventional arms that was conducted from June 2020 to August 2021. It was a multicentric trial at 19 Italian hospitals. We enrolled 180 hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia within 5 days from the onset of respiratory distress. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to standard of care (n = 60) or standard of care + three units of standard plasma (n = 60) or standard of care + three units of high-titre convalescent plasma (n = 60) administered on days 1, 3, 5 after randomization. Primary outcome was 30-days mortality. Secondary outcomes were: incidence of mechanical ventilation or death at day 30, 6-month mortality, proportion of days with mechanical ventilation on total length of hospital stay, IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion, viral clearance from plasma and respiratory tract samples, and variations in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. The trial was analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle.180 patients (133/180 [73.9%] males, mean age 66.6 years [IQR 57-73]) were enrolled a median of 8 days from onset of symptoms. At enrollment, 88.9% of patients showed moderate/severe respiratory failure. 30-days mortality was 20% in Control arm, 23% in Convalescent (risk ratio [RR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-2.13, P = 0.694) and 25% in Standard plasma (RR 1.23; 95%CI, 0.63-2.37, P = 0.544). Time to viral clearance from respiratory tract was 21 days for Convalescent, 28 for Standard plasma and 23 in Control arm but differences were not statistically significant. No differences for other secondary endpoints were seen in the three arms. Serious adverse events were reported in 1.7%, 3.3% and 5% of patients in Control, Standard and Convalescent plasma arms respectively.Neither high-titer Convalescent nor Standard plasma improve outcomes of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04428021. First posted: 11/06/2020.

Philadelphia negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell diseases. MPNs show different risk grades of thrombotic complications and acute myeloid leukemia evolution. In the last couple of decades, from JAK2 mutation detection in 2005 to the newer molecular trademarks studied through next generation sequencing, we are learning to approach MPNs from a deeper perspective. Here, we intend to elucidate the important factors affecting MPN clonal advantage and the reasons why some patients progress to more aggressive disease. Understanding these mechanisms is the key to developing new treatment approaches and targeted therapies for MPN patients.

Incidence of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) related to cancer and myeloma treatments is yet to be assessed, with scarce epidemiologic data available from surveys of limited investigated populations. A 16-year (Jan 1 st , 2003 - Dec 31 st , 2018) regional-wide, multicenter retrospective survey was carried out through the regional database of the cancer network in North-Western Italy (Rete Oncologica di Piemonte e Valle d’Aosta), aiming to assess overall frequency, raw incidence and main characteristics of MRONJ cases among myeloma/cancer patients, over a population of 4.4 million inhabitants. Main characteristics: 691 patients (261 M, 430 F); mean age: 68 (38-90) years. Underlying diseases: metastatic breast cancer (43.8%), myeloma (24.1%), metastatic prostate cancer (19.1%), other cancer (13%). Main treatment: zoledronate (71.9%), denosumab (5.3%), other drugs/sequences (22.8%). Sites of MRONJ: mandible (63.3%), maxilla (27.7%), maxilla and mandible (9%). Median number of MRONJ cases: 44 (range: 3-66) cases/year. MRONJ occurrence was registered mostly after 12-36 months of treatment (range: 1-227 months). As a result of cases observed in the regional cancer network centers, we estimated a raw unadjusted incidence ranging between 4.8 and 13 cases/million/year, with a mean of 9.5 cases/million/year and a median of 10.1 cases/million/year. The present, decades-long multicenter retrospective study represents un almost unprecedented collaboration between Oncology, Hematology, Oral Medicine / Surgery and Oral Maxillo-Facial Surgery units, to investigate the issue of MRONJ, in Italy. According to these data, MRONJ does not seem to be a rare event in metastatic cancer and myeloma populations, and should require the pursuit of such a multidisciplinary effort both in prevention and treatment.

Survival of cancer and myeloma patients after diagnosis of bone lesions is largely variable. Appropriate medical therapy together with antiresorptive treatment (bisphosphonates or denosumab) can obtain prolonged survival with adequate quality of life. Osteonecrosis of Jaws (ONJ) is not rare in patients with bone metastatic cancer and myeloma patients, occurring mostly after prolonged antiresorptive treatment. Expected survival can influence the choice of antiresorptive treatment, the perception of ONJ risk, and even the ONJ management. We reviewed survival data after start of antiresorptive treatment of 509 ONJ patients registered in a cancer network database (Rete Oncologica Piemonte-Valle d’Aosta, North-Western Italy). Main characteristics: 196 males, 313 females; median age: 68 (39-89) years. Underlying disease: breast cancer: 42.9%; myeloma: 25.3%; prostate cancer: 17.2%; lung cancer: 6.7%; renal cancer: 2.5%; other cancer types: 4.3%. Main antiresorptive treatment: zoledronic acid: 79.4%; denosumab: 5.3%; other drugs/sequences: 15.3%. Actuarial median survival (range) after the start of antiresorptive treatment was 66.0 (95% CI 57-77) months for breast cancer patients, 77.3 (95% CI 61.9-86.8) months for myeloma patients, 47.3. (95% CI 37.8-51.9) months for prostate cancer patients, 29.4 (95% CI 20.4-40.1) months for lung cancer patients, 39.4 (95% CI 20-107.3) months for renal cancer patients, 82.4 (95% CI 51.9-150.9) months for other cancer patients. Two-, three- and four-year actuarial survival rates were respectively 91.7%%, 80.2%, 67.4% for breast cancer patients, 91.4%, 83.7%, 68.9% for myeloma patients, 78.4%, 61.2%, 41.9% for prostate cancer patients; 55.8%, 32.3%, 23.5% for lung cancer patients; 61.5%, 53.8%, 46.1% for renal cancer patients; 81.8%, 77.3%, 68.1% for others cancer types. Our data support careful evaluation of short and long-term actuarial ONJ risk (versus short-term absolute risk) in the choice of antiresorptive treatment duration for bone metastatic cancer and myeloma patients. Furthermore, exclusion of jawbone surgery due to expected short survival in most of ONJ patients seems not warranted.

Simple Summary The better understanding of disease biology, the availability of new effective drugs and the increased awareness of patients’ heterogeneity in terms of fitness and personal expectations has made the current treatment paradigm of AML in the elderly very challenging. Here, we discuss the evolving criteria used to define eligibility for induction chemotherapy and transplantation, the introduction of new agents in the treatment of patients with very different clinical conditions, the implications of precision medicine and the importance of quality of life and supportive care, proposing a simplified algorithm that we follow in 2021. Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients is characterized by unfavorable prognosis due to adverse disease features and a high rate of treatment-related complications. Classical therapeutic options range from intensive chemotherapy in fit patients, potentially followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), to hypomethylating agents or palliative care alone for unfit/frail ones. In the era of precision medicine, the treatment paradigm of AML is rapidly changing. On the one hand, a plethora of new targeted drugs with good tolerability profiles are becoming available, offering the possibility to achieve a prolonged remission to many patients not otherwise eligible for more intensive therapies. On the other hand, better tools to assess patients’ fitness and improvements in the selection and management of those undergoing allo-HCT will hopefully reduce treatment-related mortality and complications. Importantly, a detailed genetic characterization of AML has become of paramount importance to choose the best therapeutic option in both intensively treated and unfit patients. Finally, improving supportive care and quality of life is of major importance in this age group, especially for the minority of patients that are still candidates for palliative care because of very poor clinical conditions or unwillingness to receive active treatments. In the present review, we discuss the evolving approaches in the treatment of older AML patients, which is becoming increasingly challenging following the advent of new effective drugs for a very heterogeneous and complex population.

Treatment for follicular lymphoma (FL) in the elderly is not well standardized. A phase II, multicentre, single arm trial was conducted in this setting with a brief chemoimmunotherapy regimen. Treatment consisted in four monthly courses of rituximab, bendamustine and mitoxantrone (R-BM) followed by 4 weekly rituximab as consolidation; rituximab maintenance was not applied because the drug was not licensed at the time of enrolment. The primary endpoint was the complete remission rate (CR). Seventy-six treatment-naive FL patients (aged 65-80 and a "FIT" score, according to the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment) were enrolled. CR was documented in 59/76 patients (78%), partial remission in 12 (16%) and stable/progressive disease in five (6%) with an overall response rate in 71/76 (94%). Median follow-up was 44 months with 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) and overall-survival of 67% and 92% respectively. Nine deaths occurred, three of progressive disease. The regimen was well tolerated and the most frequent severe toxicity was neutropenia (18% of the cycles). Bcl-2/IGH rearrangement was found in 40/75 (53%) of evaluated patients. R-BM was highly effective in clearing polymerase chain reaction-detectable disease: 29/31 (96%) evaluated patients converted to bcl-2/IGH negativity at the end of treatment. A brief R-BM regimen plus rituximab consolidation is effective and safe in "FIT" elderly, treatment-naive, FL patients, inducing high CR and molecular remission rates with prolonged PFS.

Key Points The prognosis of patients with advanced HL who achieved CMR after both 2 and 6 ABVD cycles is excellent without consolidation RT.An additional benefit of consolidation RT of sites >5 cm is likely to be small and could not be proved for this small sample size., Visual Abstract, The role of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) for bulky lesions is controversial in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma who achieve complete metabolic response (CMR) after doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD)–based chemotherapy. We present the final results of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi HD0801 trial, which investigated the potential benefit of RT in that setting. In this phase 3 randomized study, patients with a bulky lesion at baseline (a mass with largest diameter ≥5 cm) who have CMR after 2 and 6 ABVD cycles were randomly assigned 1:1 to RT vs observation (OBS) with a primary endpoint of event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years. The sample size was calculated estimating an EFS improvement for RT of 20% (from 60% to 80%). The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). One hundred sixteen patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to RT or OBS. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed a 2-year EFS of 87.8% vs 85.8% for RT vs OBS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-3.5; P = .34). At 2 years, ITT-PFS was 91.3% vs 85.8% (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-3; P = .7). Patients in CMR randomly assigned to OBS had a good outcome, and the primary end point of a 20% benefit in EFS for RT was not met. However, the sample size was underpowered to detect a benefit of 10% or less, keeping open the question of a potential, more limited role of RT in this setting. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00784537.

BACKGROUND Azacitidine (AZA) is the standard treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS); however, many patients prematurely stop therapy and have a dismal outcome. METHODS The authors analyzed outcomes after AZA treatment for 402 MDS patients consecutively enrolled in the Italian MDS Registry of the Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche, and they evaluated the North American MDS Consortium scoring system in a clinical practice setting. RESULTS At treatment discontinuation, 20.3% of the patients were still responding to AZA, 35.4% of the cases had primary resistance, and 44.3% developed adaptive resistance. Overall survival (OS) was better for patients who discontinued treatment while in response because of planned allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT; median OS, not reached) in comparison with patients with primary resistance (median OS, 4 months) or adaptive resistance (median OS, 5 months) or patients responsive but noncompliant/intolerant to AZA (median OS, 4 months; P = .004). After AZA discontinuation, 309 patients (77%) received best supportive care (BSC), 60 (15%) received active treatments, and 33 (8%) received HSCT. HSCT was associated with a significant survival advantage, regardless of the response to AZA. The North American MDS Consortium scoring system was evaluable in 278 of the 402 cases: patients at high risk had worse OS than patients at low risk (3 and 7 months, respectively; P < .001). The score was predictive of survival both in patients receiving BSC (median OS, 2 months for high-risk patients vs 5 months for low-risk patients) and in patients being actively treated (median OS, 8 months for high-risk patients vs 16 months for low-risk patients; P < .001), including transplant patients. CONCLUSIONS Real-life data confirm that this prognostic scoring system for MDS patients failing a hypomethylating agent seems to be a useful tool for optimal prognostic stratification and for choosing a second-line treatment after AZA discontinuation.

This phase-II study assessed activity and toxicity of substituting conventional doxorubicin with nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the conventional ABVD regimen for the treatment of elderly or cardiopathic patients with HL. Stage I-IIA and IIB-IV patients were treated with three courses of MBVD plus radiotherapy, or six courses of MBVD, respectively, plus radiotherapy limited to bulky or residual disease areas. The primary endpoints were CR rate and the rate of cardiac events. Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Median age was 75 years, 13 had stage I-II disease. Overall, CR was achieved by 36 patients (77%, 95% CI: 62-88), 100% and 68% in stage I-II and III-IV, respectively. With a median follow-up of 40 months (IQR: 36-45). Three-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 70% and 43%, respectively. Cardiac events grades 3-5 were reported in two patients. In conclusion, MBVD's activity and safety profile was comparable to historical ABVD data.

Purpose The clinical impact of positron emission tomography (PET) evaluation performed early during first-line therapy in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma, in terms of providing a rationale to shift patients who respond poorly onto a more intensive regimen (PET response-adapted therapy), remains to be confirmed. Patients and Methods The phase II part of the multicenter HD0801 study involved 519 patients with advanced-stage de novo Hodgkin lymphoma who received an initial treatment with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) and who underwent an early ifosfamide-containing salvage treatment followed by stem-cell transplantation if they showed a positive PET evaluation after two cycles of chemotherapy (PET2). The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival calculated for both PET2-negative patients (who completed a full six cycles of ABVD treatment) and PET2-positive patients. Overall survival was a secondary end point. Results In all, 103 of the 512 evaluable patients were PET2 positive. Among them, 81 received the scheduled salvage regimen with transplantation, 15 remained on ABVD (physician’s decision, mostly because of minimally positive PET2), five received an alternative treatment, and two were excluded because of diagnostic error. On intention-to-treat analysis, the 2-year progression-free survival was 76% for PET2-positive patients (regardless of the salvage treatment they received) and 81% for PET2-negative patients. Conclusion Patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma for whom treatment was at high risk of failing appear to benefit from early treatment intensification with autologous transplantation, as indicated by the possibility of successful salvage treatment in more than 70% of PET2-positive patients through obtaining the same 2-year progression-free survival as the PET2-negative subgroup.

Chemo-refractory NHL has a very poor outcome; the addiction of RIT to salvage regiment pre ASCT had recently demonstrated promising results.We performed a retrospective sequential study to determine the feasibility of standard Zevalin with BEAM in high-risk relapse/refractory NHL. A matched cohort analysis with a group treated with standard BEAM without Zevalin was performed as secondary endpoint. Between October 2006 and January 2013, 37 NHL patients at high risk for progression or early (

Introduction We investigated for a possible role for peritransplantation involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) by comparing patients who received IFRT before after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and patients who received salvage chemotherapy (CT) alone. Patients and Methods We retrospectively evaluated 73 consecutive patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ASCT between 2003 and 2014. Twenty-one patients (28.8%) received peritransplantation radiotherapy. A Cox regression analysis (multivariate analysis; MVA) was performed to evaluate the prognostic role of any risk factor. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated from the date of ASCT. Response to CT and ASCT were evaluated with positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Results Median follow-up was 41 months (range, 1-136 months). Overall, no significant difference appeared between patients who received IFRT and patients treated with CT alone; however, patients who were treated with IFRT had worse prognostic factors. In the MVA, advanced stage at relapse and persistent disease before ASCT (evident on PET scan [PET+]) were related to worse PFS and OS. In patients with limited stage disease at relapse and PET+, peritransplantation radiotherapy showed higher 3-year OS rates (91.7% vs. 62.3%) and PFS rates (67.5% vs. 50%) compared with patients treated with CT alone, although this difference was not significant ( P = .14 and P = .22, respectively). Conclusion IFRT used before or after ASCT might partially compensate for worse prognostic factors among the overall population; subgroup analysis showed a trend for survival benefit at 3 years in patients with limited stage disease at relapse and PET+ before ASCT.

OBJECTIVES Morphology and cytogenetics are currently used to define prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, these parameters have some limits. Flow cytometry has been recently included in the diagnostic panel for MDS, and its prognostic significance is under evaluation. METHODS Marrow aspirates from 424 MDS patients were analyzed by flow cytometry to evaluate the impact of bone marrow cell immunophenotype on overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS). The immature compartment of myeloblasts was analyzed by the quantitative expression of CD34 (

Introduction Azacytidine(AZA) is the current standard of care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in Europe. AZA has shown a survival advantage when compared with conventional therapies and has also shown activity in IPSS lower-risk patients. However, about 40% of patients do not respond and most patients show a loss of response within 2 years. Treatment options for MDS patients who progressed while on, failed to respond to, or became intolerant tohypomethylatingagents are scarce and it has been shown that overall survival (OS) is extremely short. Objectives of this study were to describe in a cohort of real life MDS patients treated with AZA, the reasons to discontinue treatment, and to evaluate their clinical outcomes. Methods We present here the results of a real life study from a large group ofnon selectedpatients recorded in the MDS registry of FondazioneItalianaSindromiMielodisplastiche(FISM). Only patients treated with AZA from January 2009 to June 2014 were considered for the analysis. All types of conventional published schedules of AZA were allowed. The primary end point was the evaluation of OS from start of AZA treatment to the date of death from any cause. Secondary end points were clinical response, cause of discontinuation, salvage treatments and OS from discontinuation of the drug. Results Between January 2009 to June 2014 1799 newly diagnosed MDS patients were enrolled , and 420 received AZA; 271 patients received AZA as 1st line treatment, 115 patients as 2nd line treatment, 34 as a line ≥3rd. Median age was 73 years (IQR: 67-77); 261 patients (62%) were male. WHO diagnosis was RA or RARS (n=27, 6%), RCMD with or without RS (n=62, 15%) AREB-1 (n=126, 30%), AREB 2 (n=190, 45%), other subtypes (n=15, 4%). At start of AZA therapy IPSS score was low in 11 (3%), int-1 in 80 (19%), int-2 in 143 (34%), high in 54 patients (13%), and not available in 132 patients (31%). Forty-three (47%) low and int-1 risk MDS patients had a transfusion-dependent anemia. Patients received a median of 7 courses of treatment (range 3-12). Twenty-four patients (6%) received concomitant erythropoietin therapy. OS at 1 year from beginning of AZA therapy was 73% for the whole cohort (420 pts)(95%CI: 0.69-0.78), and median OS was 23 months, 25 months for patients with IPSS lower-risk MDS and 21 months for those with IPSS higher risk MDS (log-rank test: 0.72). OS after discontinuation of AZA was 8 months. Clinical response was reported according to IWG criteria only in 288/420 patients (69%); 94 patients (33%) achieved a hematological response, that was complete in 35 patients (12%) and partial in 59 (20%), 78 patients (27%) had stable disease while 116 (40%) patients did not respond. Response was achieved after a median of 6 cycles (IQR: 4-11), in both lower and higher risk MDS patients. After a median follow up of 16 months (IQR:7-35) in 97 patients (23%) AZA therapy was still ongoing and in 323 has been discontinued (77%). Interruption of treatment was due to loss of response/worsening of hematological parameters in 24 patients who achieved complete or partial response (7%) and in 20 patients with stable disease (6%). AML evolution was the cause for interruption in 105 cases (32%), death in 28 (9%), toxicity or poor compliance in only 26 (8%), while clinical decision of the treating hematologist determined interruption in 22 cases (7%). In additional 98 patients AZA was discontinued early for reasons not reported by the treating physician (30%). Of the 323 patients who discontinued AZA 10 (3%) were managed with intensive AML-like chemotherapy, 17 (5%) underwent an allogeneic HSCT, 18 (6%) received low-dose chemotherapy, 42 (14%) other treatments and 236 patients (73%) received only transfusions and other supportive therapy. Conclusions Our data confirm that AZA therapy is effective for MDS patients, both with higher and lower IPSS risk disease. Response rate is consistent with what previously reported and median OS is 23 months. The interesting observation is that at 16 months, 77% of patients had discontinued treatment, either for progression or loss of response (45% of cases) and only in 8% of cases for reported toxicity. As there are few treatment options after AZA interruption, it is important to establish the reasons other than progression yielding to a stop in therapy, in order to avoid too early discontinuation and loss of survival advantage. Disclosures Finelli: Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Speaker fees; Novartis: Other: Speaker fees. Angelucci:Novartis oncology, celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Santini:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy.

Summary Background B-diffuse large-cell lymphomas (DLCL) have been associated with some molecular lesions, but the role of such lesions as prognostic markers is still controversial. This report concerns an investigation of the frequency and clinical correlation of bcl-6, bcl-2, c-myc rearrangements and 6(q) deletions in B-DLCL. Patients and methods The presence of these genetic lesions was analyzed in samples of lymph nodes or bone marrow collected at diagnosis in 71 patients with B-DLCL, all treated with an antracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen. Results Rearrangement of bcl-6 was found in 11 patients (15%), rearranged bcl-2 in 12 (17%), 6(q) deletions in 10 patients (14%) and c-myc rearrangement in four (6%). Patients with rearranged bcl-6 tended to have a more aggressive disease than patients with germ-line bcl-6 (intermediate–high/high risk according to IPI criteria: 73% vs. 43%), but there were no differences in three-year survival rates (62% vs. 42%) between the two groups. The numbers of involved extranodal sites were similar in patients with rearranged and those with germ-line bcl-6. Patients with bcl-2 rearrangement appeared to have a less aggressive disease than those with germ-line bcl-2 (low/low–intermediate risk 75% vs. 47%) and a slightly better three-year survival rate (70% vs. 41%) but again the difference was not significant. Both groups with or without 6(q) deletion had similar clinical characteristics and outcomes. The four patients with c-myc rearrangement had aggressive disease and did poorly. Conclusions The analysis of molecular lesions in B-DLCL may be useful for a better diagnostic definition; however, in this study we were unable to show that the evaluated genetic lesions had a significant impact on clinical outcome.

Summary Background: >A cooperative study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a very brief course of chemotherapy followed by locoregional radiotherapy in patients with localized-stage intermediate- to high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients and method: From January 1988 to November 1994, 84 patients with localized stages IA and IIA intermediate- to high-grade NHL underwent a combined modality treatment. AU patients underwent a six-week chemotherapy regimen, ACOP-B (doxorubicin 50 mg/sqm and cyclophosphamide 350 mg/sqm on weeks 1, 3, 5; vincristine 1.4 mg/sqm and bleomycin 10 mg/sqm on weeks 2, 4, 6; prednisone 50 mg p.o. daily throughout the first two weeks and thereafter every other day), followed by locoregional radiotherapy (36 Gy). Results: The median age was 58 years, with 35% older apthan 65 years; 52 patients had stage I and 32 stage II; 39 patients had extranodal ± nodal involvement, and 4 had testicular involvement. Treatment was well tolerated, with only 38% suffering from mild mucositis and no toxic deaths. Seventy-nine patients achieved CR after ACOP-B and 83 at the end of the program. With a median follow-up of four years, relapse-free survial was 79% with 15 relapses (93% disseminated). Two patients with testis lymphoma had CNS relapses. Overall survival was 90% at four years. Conclusion: This combined program is effective and probably curative in localized stage intermediate- to highgrade NHL, with low toxicity, also in elderly people. Patients with NHL of the testis, as primary site, require CNS prophylaxis due to the high likehood of CNS relapse.

B-lineage diffuse large cell lymphoma (B-DLCL) arising de novo is characterized by a marked degree of clinical heterogeneity. To determine whether or not the clinical heterogeneity of de novo B-DLCL is reflected by heterogeneity in the molecular features of these tumors, we investigated the pattern of distribution of several genetic lesions in 70 cases of de novo B-DLCL at diagnosis. The panel of genetic lesions tested comprised the molecular alterations most frequently detected in B-DLCL, including rearrangements of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC as well as deletions of 6q and mutations of TP53. One or more genetic lesions were detected in 39/70 cases of B-DLCL. Isolated structural alterations of BCL2, BCL6, 6q or TP53 were detected in 8/70, 10/70, 11/70, and 3/70 cases, respectively. No isolated MYC lesions were detected. Six cases carried different combinations of two genetic lesions, including lesions of BCL2 + BCL6 (1 case), BCL2 + MYC (1 case), BCL2 + 6q (2 cases), or BCL6 + 6q (2 cases). One case had accumulated three genetic lesions, namely a rearrangement of BCL2 and BCL6 and a mutation of TP53. Overall, these data show that multiple distinct patterns of genetic lesions may associate with de novo B-DLCL, indicating that the molecular pathogenesis of this group of lymphomas is characterized by a high degree of molecular heterogeneity. Genes Chromosom Cancer 16:21–30 (1996). © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Bendamustine is an alkylating agent with a nitrogen mustard group and a purine-like benzimidazole group. The aim of this study was to collect all the Italian experiences with this drug in order to evaluate the results in term of response to therapy and toxicities. We analyzed lymphoma patients treated in 24 Italian haematological centres with bendamustine alone or in combination with anti-CD20 antibody. One hundred seventy-five relapsed or refractory lymphoma patients were enrolled. The median age was 69 years (range 26-87). Seventy-nine patients were relapsed, 35 were refractory and 61 presented a progressive disease after partial response. The diagnoses were 60 indolent non-follicular lymphomas, 34 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, 48 follicular lymphomas, 30 mantle cell lymphomas and three peripheral T-cell lymphomas. All patients were evaluable for response: 52 (29%) with complete remission, 72 (43%) with partial response with an overall response rate of 71%, and 51 non-responders. With a median observation period of 10 months (1-43), 70% of patients are alive. In summary, this retrospective study shows that treatment with bendamustine alone or in combination with rituximab is a safe and effective regimen in a subset of multi-resistant patients.

Background. Bortezomib, an inhibitor of the proteasome, is effective in relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and indolent lymphomas and it is synergistic with Rituximab to enhance apoptosis and NFkB depletion. On these basis, the FIL conducted a phase II multicenter study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of Bortezomib in association with Rituximab in relapsed/refractory non-follicular Lymphoma (Linfocytic, LL and Marginal Zone Lymphoma, MZL) and MCL, not eligible to high dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation. Patients and methods. The study was a prospective single arm phase II trial, designed on Simon two-stage Optimal Design. Primary end-point was to obtain an Overall Response Rate (ORR) > 40%. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate long term follow-up of Bortezomib and Rituximab combination. A central histological revision was planned in all the patients at the enrollment. Inclusion criteria were: 18-75 years, relapsed/refractory LL, MZL, MCL after 1-4 lines. Treatment schedule was: one course of 1.6 mg/sqm Bortezomib weekly in combination with standard 375 mg/sqm Rituximab on days 1, 8, 15, 22 followed by two courses of four weekly intravenous bolus of Bortezomib alone; patients with complete (CR), partial remission and stable disease at the intermediate evaluation were planned to be given three further courses with the same schedule. Results. From September 2006 to March 2008, 55 patients were enrolled and six were excluded at central histological revision. Clinical characteristics were: median age 68 (50-74); 16 (33%) LL, 8 (16%) MZL, 25 (51%) MCL; 42 (86%) stage III/IV; 33 (67%) bone marrow involvement. Median number of previous treatments was 2 (range 1-7); 34 (69%) were Rituximab pretreated; 21 (43%) had refractory disease. Thirty (61%) patients completed the treatment and 233 courses were delivered (median: 4.7 courses/patient); 19 (39%) patients did not because of no response in 13, adverse events in five, with only one toxic death due to interstitial pneumonia. ORR was 53% (CR 26.5%); no response was seen in 43% and 4% were not evaluable for response. ORRs by clinical subgroup were: LL 37%, MZL 50%, MCL 64%; Rituximab pretreated 62%, Rituximab naïve 33%; relapsed 64% and refractory 38%. With a median follow-up of 85 months, median Overall Survival (OS) was 61.5 months (95%CI: 35.0-81.5), with 5-years OS 51% (95% CI: 36-65) and median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 8.9 months (95%CI: 5.3-18.3), with 5-years PFS 16% (95% CI: 7-28%). Five-years PFS by histology was: 12% (95% CI: 2-31) for LL, 17% (95% CI: 5-34) for MCL and 19% (95% CI: 11-53) for MZL. PFS rates were not different between Rituximab pretreated versus naïve nor international prognostic index 1-2 versus 3-4-5 nor refractory versus relapsed. By number of previous therapies, 5-years PFS for 1 previous therapy versus 2 versus 3 or more was: 24%, 14% and 13%, respectively, p=0.36. Conclusions. Weekly infusion of Bortezomib in combination with Rituximab is effective in relapsed/refractory indolent and MCL and represents a treatment option in this setting of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Morphology and cytogenetics are currently used to define prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, these parameters have some limits. Flow cytometry has been recently included in the diagnostic panel for MDS, and its prognostic significance is under evaluation.Marrow aspirates from 424 MDS patients were analyzed by flow cytometry to evaluate the impact of bone marrow cell immunophenotype on overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS). The immature compartment of myeloblasts was analyzed by the quantitative expression of CD34 (3% vs. ≥3%), CD117, and CD11b(-) /CD66b(-) (5% vs. ≥5%); myeloid maturation was analyzed by the expression of CD11b(+) /CD66b(++) (15% vs. ≥15%) and CD11b(+) /CD66b(+) (25% vs. ≥25%).In univariate analysis, the expression of immaturity markers (CD34(+) , CD117(+) , and CD11b(-) /CD66b(-) ) was associated with shorter LFS and OS (P 0.0001); higher expression of differentiation markers (CD11b(+) /CD66b(++) and CD11b(+) /CD66b(+) ) was associated with longer LFS (P 0.0001 and P = 0.0002, respectively) and OS (P 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, expression of CD34(+) (P = 0.007), CD117(+) (P = 0.013), and CD11b(+) /CD66b(++) (P = 0.023) retained independent prognostic value for OS, while only the expression of CD34(+) was a prognostic factor for LFS (P = 0.0003). Two different risk groups were defined according to the presence of 0-1 or ≥2 of these factors with significant different LFS and OS (P 0.0001). This score showed prognostic value in predicting survival even in subanalysis according to IPSS and WHO subgroups.Flow cytometric analysis in MDS may provide meaningful prognostic information. Blast percentage expressed as CD117(+) or CD34(+) cells and the quantitative assessment of myeloid maturation showed prognostic value for survival.

Recently, management of limited stage diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL) is trending toward a low intensity chemotherapy approach. Since 1993 we have used a brief weekly (6 weeks) chemotherapy scheme (Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Bleomycin, Vincristine, and Prednisone = ACOP-B) followed by involved field radiotherapy in 207 consecutive patients with well defined localized DLCL without age limit (median 57 years, range 18-85). Treatment was completed as designed in 183 of 207 patients (88%). One hundred and ninety-nine patients (96%) achieved complete remission. At a median follow-up of 66 months 170 patients are alive (82%), 168 of them free of disease. Twenty-nine patients experienced relapse after achieving a complete remission. Kaplan-Meier, risk of relapse was 24% after 13 years. Thirty (14.5%) patients have died, 14 (6.8%) due to lymphoma progression, one due to regimen toxicity and 15 (7.2%) from other causes while remaining in complete remission. The probability of overall survival and event free survival at 13 years was 78% (95% CI 70-87%) and 63% (95% CI 50-75), respectively. Crude rate of secondary malignancy was 5.26 /1000 person-years. The ACOP-B regimen plus involved field radiotherapy is well tolerated both short and long term and is an effective chemotherapy scheme for very well defined limited stage aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas in all age categories.

Abstract 3758 Poster Board III-694 Introduction The combination of Bortezomib (B) and Rituximab (R) has been shown in vitro synergistic apoptosis and enhanced NFkB depletion in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) and Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) cells. Rituximab in combination with Bortezomib is well tolerated without overlapping toxicities. Our study was aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of the association of Rituximab and Bortezomib in relapsed/refractory indolent non follicular and mantle cell lymphoma patients not eligible to high dose chemotherapy and ASCT. The study was designed according to Simon's two stage Optimal Design and the primary endpoint was the achievement of an Overall Response Rate (ORR) > 40%. Patients and methods From September 2006 to March 2008, 54 patients were enrolled into the study. Histology was centrally reviewed in all cases: 49 diagnosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were evaluable for the analysis. Clinical characteristics were as follows: 28 males and 21 females; median age 68 years (range 50-74); 16 lymphocytic/lymphoplasmacytic (LL), 8 MZL and 25 MCL; seven stage I-II disease, nine III and 33 IV; 33 were BM positive; according to IPI 36 patients were at low-intermediate risk and 18 at intermediate-high/high risk; 11 patients had 1 and 38 > 2 prior lines of chemotherapy; 15 were R-naïve patients and 34 R-pretreated, 21 patients had refractory disease ( 1 yr). The treatment plan was: one course of 4 weekly doses of Rituximab (375 mg/sqm) and Bortezomib (1.6 mg/sqm IV bolus) followed by 2 courses of 4 weekly IV bolus of B (1.6 mg/sqm) as single agent. Responding (CR+ PR) and stable disease patients were planned to be given three further courses with the same schedule. Results ORR was 26/49 (53%). Responses were as follows: 13 CR (26.5%) and 13 PR (26.5%). ORR by histology was: 6/16 (37.5%) in LL, 4/8 (50%) in MZL and 16/25 (64%) in MCL respectively. Pretreatment with Rituximab did not adversely affect the ORR: 21/34 (62%) in R-pretreated patients and 5/15 (33%) in R-naïve patients (p .06). ORR was higher in relapsed patients compared with refractory ones: 18/28 (64%) and 8/21 (38%) (p .06). With a median follow-up of one year, Overall Survival (OS) was 93% (95%CI: 79.7-97.9) and 1-year Progression free survival (PFS) was 45% (95%CI: 30-59) (Figure 1). A total of 233 courses were delivered with a median of 4.7 courses per patient. Twenty-eight patients completed the treatment plan and 21 were withdrawn from the study because of: 17 PD during treatment and 4 AE (1 concomitant gastric neoplasia, 1 neurotoxicity grade II, 1 pleural effusion and 1 toxic death due to interstitial pneumonia). Grade 3-4 CTC haematological toxicity was rare with neutropenia in 5% of the courses and thrombocytopenia in III in 5. Conclusions This study suggests that the combination of Rituximab and Bortezomib is feasible and effective in relapsed/refractory indolent non follicular lymphoma and MCL. This treatment combination is a good therapeutic option without chemotherapy mainly in MCL and MZL also in Rituximab pretreated patients. Our data suggest a promising PFS in this subset of heavily pretreated patients. The combination of Rituximab plus Bortezomib should be explored in further and larger studies. Disclosures: Vitolo: Roche: lecture fees. Off Label Use: Bortezomib was provided free by Jansen-Cilag who gave a research grant to support the study.

Introduction : MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 overexpression, assessed by IHC, with the latter conferring a better prognosis, have been reported to be a prognostic factor in DLBCL, but data are not consistent and sometimes contradictory. The aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic impact of overexpression of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 in a retrospective cohort of de-novo DLBCL, selected for an high proliferation index (MIB1 ≥70%), treated consecutively with R-CHOP regimen. Methods: Patients with de-novo DLBCL diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2013 were included into the study. Inclusion criteria were: high proliferation index MIB1 ≥ 70% and a full course of R-CHOP regimen. Paraffin-embedded tumor samples were collected and investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MYC, BCL2 and BCL6. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is ongoing. MYC/BCL2+ or MYC/BCL6+ double expression cases were identified if they had rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 or BCL6. MYC immunochemistry was done on TMA sections using the antibody clone Y69. BCL2 and BCL6 staining had been evaluated previously at diagnosis. Tumor cells were defined positive for MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 protein expression by immunostaining if >40%, >40% and >25% of cells showed positive expression, respectively. Progression free survival curves (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank test and Cox models. Results : One hundred and sixty seven patients are evaluable for clinical characteristics and 69/167 had paraffin embedded tumor samples available for immunohistochemistry at the time of present analysis. Clinical characteristics of the 69 cases were: median age 66 years (IQR 57;73), 45 (65%) male, 47 (68%) stage III-IV, 35 (54%) with elevated LDH levels and 46 (67%) at International Prognostic Index (IPI) high intermediate or high risk. Overexpression of MYC was detected in 28 cases (41%), 50 (72%) and 38 (55%) showed BCL2 and BCL6 overexpression respectively. Nineteen (28%) cases showed MYC/BCL2+ and 17 (25%) MYC/BCL6+ double expression. With a median follow up of 26 months, the median 2-years PFS was 59%. Overexpression of MYC and BCL2 proteins and low expression of BCL6 were associated with an inferior 2-years PFS in univariate analysis: MYC- vs MYC+ 64% vs 55%; BCL2- vs BCL2+ 71% vs 56%; BCL6+ vs BCL6- 61% vs 54%. In a Cox multivariate regression model adjusted for IPI and age, MYC overexpression, BCL2 positivity and BCL6 negativity showed prognostic relevance as significant independent indicators with different risk (Hazard ratio 2.53 for MYC+, 2.08 for BCL2+ and 1.62 for BCL6-). Established that the three variable contributed with different risk in the multivariate analysis, an IHC sum additive score of 0-5 was calculated proportionally to the coefficient estimated (coefficient [Log hazard ratio] 0.92 for MYC+, 0.73 for BCL2+ and 0.48 for BCL6-), assigning an individual risk of 2 points for MYC or BCL2 positivity and 1 point for BCL6 negativity. Two years-PFS was significantly different between all separate groups (Hazard ratio for unit increase 1.57 95% CI 1.11-2.22, p=0.01). After pooling scores 0-1 (with or without BCL6), 2 (presence of MYC or BCL2 only), and 3-4-5 (MYC+/BCL6-, BCL2+/BCL6-, MYC+/BCL2+, MYC+/BCL2+/BCL6-) 2-yrs PFS rates were different across the three groups: 100% vs 64% vs 50% (log rank p= 0.04) (figure 1). Conclusion: Our data showed, with the limits of a small sample size, that MYC overexpression alone or with high expression of BCL2 and/or low expression of BCL6 correlates with a worse prognosis independently by IPI score in a cohort of DLBCL selected for high proliferation index and treated with R-CHOP. Assessment of MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 expression by IHC represents a rapid, inexpensive, and reproducible technique. These results need to be confirmed in our complete series of 167 patients (analysis ongoing) and validated prospectively in a larger cohort, using standardized staining and scoring methodologies. Thus, MYC and BCL2 represent relevant biomarkers that should be tested in future clinical trials using novel effective and targeted agents in order to improve the prognosis of DLBCL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

PURPOSE In our previous study with MACOPB, we identified a high-risk group of patients with a poor 3-year survival rate of 29%. These patients were defined as having at diagnosis advanced-stage disease with high tumor burden (TB) and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level or bone marrow (BM) involvement. A novel therapeutic scheme was investigated to improve the outcome of these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty patients with high-risk diffuse large-cell lymphoma (DLCL) were enrolled. The therapeutic scheme includes three phases: induction with 8 weeks of MACOPB; intensification with a 3-day course of mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2 plus high-dose cytarabine (HDARA-C) 2 g/m2 every 12 hours plus dexamethasone 4 mg/m2 every 12 hours (MAD protocol) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 microg/kg on days 4 to 17 to harvest peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPC); consolidation with carmustine (BCNU), etoposide, ARA-C, and melphalan (BEAM) regimen; plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) with PBPC, marrow, or both. RESULTS Thirty-six patients (72%) achieved a complete response (CR), 11 (22%) showed no response (NR), and three (6%) died of toxicity. Among the 22 PRs or NRs after the induction phase, 56% of patients achieved a CR with subsequent intensified therapy. With a median follow-up duration of 32 months, the overall survival and failure-free survival rates were 56% and 50%, respectively. The disease-free survival rate is 69% at 32 months. Leukapheresis after MAD and G-CSF yielded a median of 32 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells and 80 x 10(4)/kg granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM). Thirty-nine patients were autografted and 11 did not undergo ASCT: six because of disease progression, four due to toxicity, and one because of patient refusal. The median times to achieve engrafment were 11 days (range, 7 to 19) to a neutrophil count greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/L and 12 days (range, 8 to 60) to a platelet count greater than 50 x 10(9)/L. CONCLUSION This sequential scheme with intensified and high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT is feasible with moderate toxicity and may improve the outcome in high-risk DLCL.

Introduction Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) have been demonstrated to reduce the transfusion requirements in International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low/Int-1 risk MDS patients and response to ESAs is associated with an improved quality of life. Response to ESAs varies from 20 to 60% according to the different studies and an association between ESAs response and a better overall survival (OS), without any disease evolution to AML has been reported. Aim of our study is to analyze the real life use of ESAs in Italy and to assess which group of lower risk MDS patients can benefit more by this treatment. Methods From 1999 to 30 Jun 2013, 2487 patients affected by MDS were included in the Network of the Italian MDS Registries. Morphological MDS diagnosis was confirmed. Among them, 1411 IPSS low/int-1 patients with follow-up data available were selected. Furthermore we excluded the following cases: 87 patients who were treated at any time by azacytidine (n=61) or lenalidomide (n=26), 95 patients with WHO 2002 diagnosis of CMML and aCML, 96 patients with incomplete data, 84 patients unhomogeneously treated with ESAs other than EPO alpha. We obtained a final data base of 1049 cases. OS and leukemic evolution (LE) according to EPO treatment were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit survival curve estimates and log-rank tests. Results Median age was 74 years, 59% of the patients were male and 41 % female. WHO 2002 classification was as follows: 296 (28 %) Refractory Anemia, 347 (33 %) refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, 94 (9%) refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts, 46 (4 %) Del 5q, 188 (18 %) refractory anemia with excess of blasts and 78 (7 %) MDS unclassifiable. Median hemoglobin level at baseline was 10.0 g/dL. One hundred and twenty patients (11%) were previously transfused with a Hb baseline level less than 8.0 g/dL; 448 not yet transfused patients (43%) presented a mild anaemia with Hb ranging from 8 to 10 g/dL and 481 patients (46%) had a Hb level higher than 10 g/dL. Patients classification according to IPSS was as follows: low 55% (n=575); int-1 45% (n=474). 335 (32%) out of 1049 patients received EPO alpha treatment while the remaining 714 patients (68%) were supported without any ESAs treatment. The rate of erythroid response to EPO therapy was 61%. Median duration of response was 82 weeks. The response rate to EPO was significantly higher in non transfused than in transfused patients: 69% versus 14% respectively (p value < 0.001). Only 52 out of 1049 patients showed a LE and a higher incidence of LE in EPO treated patients was not observed. Considering the whole group of patients, the OS of EPO treated patients was not statistically different from untreated ones. However EPO responders patients showed a better OS in comparison to both the non responders and non-EPO treated patients (p value < 0.05). When we stratified patients according to the basal hemoglobin level (lower than 8 g/dL, from 8 to 10 g/dL and higher than 10 g/dL) in patients with Hb ranging from 8 to 10 g/dL we observed a significant improvement in OS following successful EPO treatment (median survival: EPO vs. non-EPO 64 vs. 43 months respectively; p 10 g/dL. Even if adverse events were not prospectively recorded in the Registry, no frequent thromboembolic events was reported in EPO group in comparison to non treated patients. Conclusions Our survey can suffer from selection bias due to the limits typical of a voluntary-based registry, but it can be considered a good real life picture of EPO alpha therapy in lower risk Italian MDS patients. Our data confirm that EPOa treatment is globally safe and that patients who can benefit more are the mild anemic untransfused subjects, with baseline Hb level ranging from 8 to 10 g/dL. Disclosures: Santini: Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

Introduction The role of interim-PET (i-PET), after two cycles of chemotherapy, in advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma is well defined; the same role in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is still controversial. The Fondazione Italiana Linfomi planned a prospective randomized phase III trial, addressed to young poor prognosis DLBCL patients at the diagnosis, with a 2x2 factorial design aimed at investigating the possible benefit of intensification with R-HDC+ASCT after R-dose-dense chemotherapy delivered at two different level of dose (R-CHOP14/R-MegaCHOP14). During this study an ancillary study was designed to define the prognostic impact of i-PET on progression free survival (PFS) after two cycles of immunochemotherapy in all treatments arms. Patients and methods As described by Vitolo et al (oral communication, abs 688 ASH 2012), patients were stratified according to aa-IPI and randomized at diagnosis to receive: R-CHOP14 x 8 cycles; R-MegaCHOP14 (1200 mg/sqm Cyclophosphamide, 70 mg/sqm Doxorubicin, standard dose Vincristine and Prednisone) x 6; R-CHOP14 x 4 + R-HDC (Rituximab + High Dose Cytarabine + Mitoxantrone + Dexamethasone) followed by BEAM and ASCT; R-MegaCHOP14 x 4 + R-HDC + BEAM and ASCT. G-CSF support was mandatory. Seventeen centers agreed to participate in the study and enrolled patients. All evaluable patients had performed basal PET and i-PET. A visual dichotomous criteria, according to Deauville Criteria (First Consensus Conference, 2009), was used to define the i-PET result. The final response was identified according to 2007 Cheson response criteria. Results From June 2005 to September 2010, 399 patients were randomized in the overall DLCL04 study and 130 were enrolled for the ancillary PET study , 69 in the R-HDC+ASCT and 61 in R dose dense therapy respectively. The clinical characteristics, as in the overall DLCL04 study, were well balanced among the four arms of therapy excluding a selection bias in the group of patients studied with i-PET. The i-PET result was positive in 74 patients and negative in 56 patients, no differences were observed between negative and positive i-PET results according to clinical characteristics and group of treatment. In particular, in R-dose dense arm 27 were negative and 34 positive, in R-HDC+ASCT 29 were negative and 40 positive, according to immunochemotherapy scheme in R-CHOP14 29 were negative and 40 were positive, in MegaCHOP14 27 were negative and 34 were positive. With a median follow-up of 36 months, 3-year PFS and 3-year Overall Survival (OS) rates for the whole series were: 64% (95% CI:59-69) and 79% (95% CI:74-83) respectively. No differences in PFS was reported according to i-PET result. In particular 3-year PFS were 87%(95% CI:75-94) in i-PET negative patients and 76% (95% CI: 65-85) in i-PET positive patients respectively (p: 0.09 The 3-year PFS according to I- PET results in the different treatment arm were: in the R-HDT+ASCT group i-PET negative or i-PET positive patients had a 3-year PFS of 83% (95% CI:63-92) and 79% (95% CI:63-89) respectively; in the R-dose dense i-PET negative or i-PET positive patients had a 3-year PFS of 92% (95% CI:73-98) and 72% (95% CI:54-85) with a p value near the significance (0.07). According to OS, i-PET negative and i-PET positive patients had a 3-year OS of 89%(95% CI:76-95) and 83%(95% CI:72-90) respectively, p=0.219. Conclusions In our multicenter prospective study, addressed to young poor prognosis DLBCL patients at the diagnosis, i-PET, performed after two immunochemotherapy cycles and analyzed with a visual method, is not able to identify two different risk population. To confirm our data, we are planning in the near future a centralized revision of all evaluable PET. In conclusion, our feeling is that the i-PET after two cycles in poor prognosis DLBCL patients is too early to predict a chemorefractory disease and more parameters must be considered to define clinical response in these patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Erythroid stimulating agents (ESAs) are a common treatment for lower risk anaemic MDS patients (pts). The response rate varies from 20 to 60% according to the different published studies and ESAs are recommended in International Guidelines. Many clinical and biological parameters have been proposed as predictors of response. Little is known about ESAs therapy in real life. Purpose:We performed an analysis based on the network of regional Italian MDS Registries in order to assess which group of patients could benefit more of ESAs treatment. Materials and Methods: From 2487 pts enrolled in the Registry from 1999 to November 2012, we selected a group of 1411 low or intermediate-1 cases with follow-up data available. No differences in leukemic evolution rate have been observed by ESAs treatment (p=0,279). Subsequently, in order to study the effect of ESAs on survival, we excluded the 92 pts who experienced a leukemic evolution and the cases whose evolution was influenced by lenalidomide and/or azacytidine treatments. Cases treated with ESAs other than erythropoietin alpha (EPOa) were excluded because of the low number of observations and/or incomplete information and/or inhomogeneous dosages. Finally, we obtained a data base of 1110 pts treated by EPOa or observation only. We evaluated Overall Survival (OS) according to EPOa treatment considering the degree of anaemia at baseline. Results: The 1110 pts were subdivided according to Hb level as follows: 123 (11%) with Hb 10 g/dL. Three hundred and fifty six pts were treated by EPOa. The difference in OS by EPOa treatment in the whole cohort was not statistically significant. However, when considering patients not yet transfusion dependent with Hb levels ranging from 8 g/dL to 10 g/dL, there was a clear statistically significant difference in OS: median time 216 months in EPOa treated group vs 99 months in non treated pts (p=0,002). The influence of EPOa on OS in pts with Hb 10 g/dL did not reached a significant level. Additionally, no statistically significant difference was observed in deaths for thrombotic events. Conclusions: Our real life experience confirms that EPOa treatment is safe inMDS patients and it is particularly useful in prolonging OS of the selected group of lower risk pts with mild anaemia not yet transfusion dependent.

Abstract 1606 Introduction. Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) patients at high-risk (age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aa-IPI) 2–3), had a dismal prognosis if treated with conventional chemotherapy. The introduction of intensive regimens and the addition of monoclonal antibody anti-CD20, improved prognosis, but some issues remain unresolved such as: the risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapses and the incidence of late toxicities. We analyzed a series of young DLBCL patients at high-risk consecutively treated in four prospective trials by the Italian Lymphoma Foundation (FIL) with the aim to assess the risk of CNS relapses and late toxicities in this series of patients with a prolonged follow-up Methods. From 1986 to 2006, 278 patients with DLBCL with aa-IPI 2–3 at diagnosis, were enrolled in four consecutive trials previously reported. Thirty-two into a phase II study, treated with 12 weekly infusion of MACOP-B; 39 into a phase II trial with eight weekly MACOP-B infusions followed by high-dose cytarabine, mitoxantrone and dexamethasone (MAD) plus standard BEAM and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); 95 in a phase III trial that randomized high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy plus ASCT (45 patients) vs six courses of dose-dense intensified CHOP (iCHOP) (50 patients); 112 into a phase II trial with four courses of iCHOP in combination with Rituximab followed by Rituximab-MAD + BEAM and ASCT. CNS prophylaxis was not mandatory in the four protocols. Updated data regarding of survival, CNS relapses and late toxicities were recorded on June 2011. Results. Clinical characteristics were: aa-IPI 2 in 55%, aa-IPI 3 in 45%, PS > 2 in 66%, LDH upper normal value in 89%, number of extranodal sites > 2 in 35%, bone marrow involvement in 27% of patients, with no statistical differences between the four trials. With a median follow-up of five years, 5-year Overall Survival (OS) was 63% (95% CI: 57–69%) in the whole series; 5-year OS by treatment was 41% (95%CI: 24–74%) in MACOPB, 54% (95%CI: 37–68%) in MACOPB+MAD+BEAM and ASCT; 53% (95%CI: 38–67%) in HDS+ASCT; 58% (95%CI: 43–70%) in iCHOP; 79% (95%CI: 70–86%) in R-iCHOP+R-MAD+BEAM and ASCT. In a multivariate analysis, the risk of death was significantly reduced in R-iCHOP+R-MAD+BEAM and ASCT (p Disclosures: Vitolo: Roche Italy: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jannsen-Cilag: Speakers Bureau.

Abstract 1729 Background: Management of neoplastic patients is strongly influenced by comorbidities, especially in more advanced ages. Due to that, comorbidities evaluation is a critical issue in the global assessment of patients (pts) affected by myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Until now, there is no agreement on which comorbidity index (CI) is more suitable in this setting and different CI has been proposed. Recently a new MDS-specific score (MDS-CI) has been published by Della Porta et al., while the majority of CI in use has been developed in geriatric oncology setting. One of the most useful is Cumulative Illness Rating Scale of Geriatrics (CIRS-G). Aim of our study: Aim of our study was to test the usefulness of the conventional and easy to apply CIRS-G score among a cohort of MDS pts enrolled in the MDS Piedmont Registry from 1999 to 2010 in predicting OS and leukemic progression. Materials and methods: 788 patients from the MDS Piedmont Registry with CIRS-G evaluation at diagnosis were included in our statistical analysis. 78% of the patients were low and Int-1 IPSS risk, the remaining 22% were Int-2-high risk. The majority of patients (69%) carried an histological diagnosis of non RAEB MDS according to WHO classification, the remaining 31% were RAEB I-II. Age stratification was as follows: 10% up to 60, 23% from 61 to 70, 43% from 71 to 80, 24% over 80 years. Comorbidities with score up to 2 were considered mild while the ones with values higher than 2 were considered severe. We evaluated the global impairment of each patient creating two comorbidity scores based on the number of mild comorbidities (mild comorbidities score, MCS) and severe comorbidities (severe comorbidities score, SCS). Results: The majority of our patients showed only mild comorbidities and the comorbidities with the greater number of patients carrying severe grade of impairment are the cardiac (25%), hypertensive (30%) and endocrinological (20%) ones. COX analysis did not show an impact of comorbidities on leukemic progression risk while there is a statistically significant impact on overall survival of respiratory, renal, urological and osteo-muscular comorbidities (HR respectively of 1,18; 1,3; 1,3; 1,16). There is a trend of increased risk of non MDS related death in patients with severe grade of each comorbidity. Then we set up a Fine and Gray regression model in order to evaluate the global impact of comorbidities on leukemic progression and overall survival according to SCS and MCS. Neither SCS nor MCS showed an impact on the leukemic progression risk. Considering overall survival (OS), MCS showed a HR of 1,12 (p= 0,009) and moreover SCS has a strong impact on the risk of death (HR 1,59; p= 0,000). MCS remains statistically significant in low IPSS risk patients (p Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 611 Background: Improvements in hematologic parameters have been associated with iron chelation therapy (ICT) in transfusion-dependent patients with chronic anemia associated with hematologic malignancies. Data from a significant cohort of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients enrolled in the EPIC study and treated with deferasirox reported a percentage of 22.6% of erythroid responses. Several sporadic reports showed hematologic improvement in patients treated with deferoxamine or deferasirox in patients affected by myelofibrosis (PMF) and Aplastic Anemia (AA). The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the hematologic response in the entire cohort of chronic anemias with iron overload receiving ICT with both deferasirox (DFX) or deferoxamine (DFO) in 6 hematological Italian centers from 1993 to 2011. Methods: 105 patients received ICT for at least 3 months. Sixteen were PMF, 8 AA, 75 MDS, 4 Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), 2 Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). 30 patients received deferoxamine (6 PMF, 3 AA, 1 CMML, 2 AML, 18 MDS), and 68 deferasirox (9 PMF,5 AA, 3 CMML, 51 MDS), and 7 received deferasirox after a prior treatment with deferoxamine (1 PMF, 6 MDS). The median serum ferritin levels at the time of ICT was 1983 ng/ml and it was not significantly different between the two cohorts (p=0,8). Patients, at the time of ICT, had transfused a median of 30 Units of RBC (40 in the DFO cohort and 24.5 in DFX cohort, p=0.001). 25 out of 105 were receiving EPO therapy at the time of chelation, started at least 6 months before ICT, without a significant clinical improvement and three were receiving a JAK2 inhibitor started at least 1 year before ICT. Patients receiving any kind of therapy able to modify the erythroid response including azacitidine were excluded as well as patients receiving EPO started less than 6 months before ICT or JAK2 inhibitors or immunosuppressive therapy less than 12 months before. Hematological response (HR) was evaluated as follow: Achieving a RBC transfusion independency (complete HR) or Hematological improvement (HI-e) for patients showing a Hb increase of 1.5 g/dL or a reduction of 4 RBC transfusions/8 weeks (IWG 2006). Results: We retrospectively analyzed an unselected cohort of patients with transfusion dependent iron overload affected by different hematologic malignancies who received ICT outside clinical trials thus allowing the inclusion of high risk MDS/AML. 13 patients were not evaluable because they were receiving ICT for less than 3 months. 41 patients out of 92 (42.7%) evaluable patients achieved a hematologic response. In details: 18 (19,5%) became completely RBC transfusion independent. Six (1 AA, 3 RARS, 1 RCMD, 1 AML) were under DFO treatment and 12 (3 AA, 2 RA, 3 RARS, 1 RAEBII, 1 CMML, 2 PMF) under DFX. In addition, all 4 AA patients who achieved transfusion independency significantly increased the number of platelets ( median 17.000/mm3 before ICT and 35.000 and 55.000 after 6 and 12 months of ICT). Median time to response was 15 months for DFO and 3 months for DFX. 16 patients (17.3%) (6 RA, 4 RARS,1 RCMD, 1 RAEB, 4 PMF) obtained HI-e defined as a reduction of 4 U/8 weeks (5 in DFO and 11 in DFX cohorts) after a median of 6 months for both DFO and DFX. HI-e defined as an increased of 1.5 g/dL was observed in 7 patients (7.6%) ( 4 RA, 1 RARS, 1 RCMD, 1 PMF) after a median of 6 months for DFO and 3 for DFX. The hematologic improvement is not strictly related to an effective reduction of serum ferritin (p=0,4). Conclusions: Our data show a high rate of complete responses, mainly in AA and RARS but also in high risk MDS/AML representing 11% of those achieving complete transfusion independency. Notably 50% of AA achieved RBC and platelet transfusion independency. Despite the limitation due to the retrospective collection of data we suggest the ICT could result in hematologic improvement in a wide population including patients who are, at present, outside the published ICT guidelines. This study warrants further investigation on the mechanism of action of ICT in inducing erythroid response. Disclosures: Saglio: Novartis, Brystol Myers: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract 2636 Background and objectives: Quality of response assessed with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose - Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) is confirmed as a strong independent prognostic factor in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Recently the prognostic role of response assessment with PET was also shown in patients with Follicular Lymphoma (FL) (Trotman et al JCO 2011). We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate the role of FDG-PET after immunochemotherapy in FL. Patients and methods: The study was designed as a retrospective unplanned analysis of newly diagnosed FL patients randomized among R-CVP, R-CHOP, R-FM in the FOLL05 clinical trial (NCT00774826). To be included in the study patients should have confirmed eligibility for the FOLL05 trial, have available data on clinical presentation, treatment details and results, and on follow-up. As mandatory patients should have undergone staging and restaging at the end of treatment with FDG-PET. Local PET interpretation was used to identify clearly positive and clearly negative cases. For this phase of the study uncertain cases were not analyzed for study endpoints: centralized review is ongoing. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scans were also collected to confirm quality of response: in particular a cut off of 1.5 cm for the maximum transverse diameter of residual lymph nodes was considered to separate Complete vs. Partial remissions according to International Workshop Criteria (IWC) (Cheson et al JCO 1999). The primary study endpoint was Progression Free Survival. Results: Among 534 patients enrolled in the FOLL05 trial, 114 cases fulfilled eligibility criteria for this study. Baseline patients characteristics did not differ from the overall FOLL05 patient population. In particular FLIPI was 0–1 in 23%, 2 in 42% and 3–5 in 35%. First-line immunochemotherapy, included R-CHOP (36 pts.), R-CVP (33), and R-FM (45). No maintenance therapy with Rituximab was given. Overall response rate at the end of therapy, defined according to IWC, was 97% including a 78% complete remissions (CR) rate. Baseline PET scan was positive in all patients. In 16 cases an interim PET was also available and resulted clearly positive in 6 patients (38%). At the end of treatment 10 cases had inconclusive final PET results and were excluded from subsequent analyses; a clearly positive PET scan was recorded in 26 out of the remaining 104 (25%). In univariate logistic analysis number of nodal sites (>4) was predictive of final positive PET. Although a trend towards a higher rate of PET positive scans was observed with increasing FLIPI and FLIPI2 this difference was not statistically significant. The rate of patients with negative final PET was 81%, 57%, and 60% for those in CR, PR, and less than PR (Fisher exact test: P=0.021). Assessing response with International Harmonization Project (IHP) criteria (Cheson et al JCO 2007), that also consider PET, 14/74 (19%) of patients previously defined in CR according to IWC were changed to PR and 13/23 (57%) of those in PR were switched to CR. The CR rate changed from 78% to 75% with an agreement rate of 70% between IWC and IHP. With a median follow up of 28 months (range 9–56), 3 year PFS was 68% (95% IC 54%–79%). In univariate analysis a shorter 3yr PFS was observed in post-treatment PET+ vs. PET- patients: 48% vs 84% (log rank p=0.036, HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.03–5.3). A positive final PET was confirmed as a poor prognostic factor when adjusted by FLIPI and FLIPI2 (HR 2.33 P=0.048, and HR 2.41 P=0.039, respectively). Prognostic role of final PET was not affected by treatment arm or by any of analyzed prognostic factors. Finally a trend toward a prolonged duration of remission was observed for patients who achieved a PET negative CR, compared with PET+ CRs and and both PET+/− PRs. Conclusions: This FOLL05 ancillary study confirms that post-treatment PET-CT can modify response allocation and is a predictor of PFS after first line immunochemotherapy in patients with FL. If the prognostic role of PET assessment of response will be confirmed in a larger series and in prospective studies a response adapted treatment strategy could be tested also in FL. Disclosures: Di Raimondo: Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract 3107 High dose chemotherapy (HDC) and ASCT is actually considered an effective treatment for relapsed NHL. Standard dose Zevalin (0.4 mCi/kg) combined with conventional BEAM (Z-BEAM) is a promising conditioning regimen for the treatment of high risk relapsed/resistant NHL. We evaluated the feasibility and the efficacy of Z-BEAM in a group of relapsed/refractory patients treated in a single institution. Between October 2006 and December 2010 twenty nine pts were treated with Zevalin (day –14) followed by standard dose BEAM (day –7 to –1) and ASCT. Patients were included into the study and considered at high risk of failure if showed: progression or early relapse ( Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 3965 Introduction. Gene-profiling studies demonstrated a constitutive activation of the NFκB signalling pathway in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) and Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL). Bortezomib, a potent inhibitor of the 26S proteasome, is a good candidate to block this pathway and was tested in relapsed or refractory MCL with encouraging results (objective response up to 45%, with a median PFS of 5–7 months). In vitro, the combination of Bortezomib and Rituximab has been shown synergistic apoptosis and enhanced NFkB depletion in MCL and MZL cells. Aim. On these bases, the IIL conducted a phase II multicenter study to evaluate safety and efficacy of Rituximab and Bortezomib combination in relapsed/refractory indolent non-follicular lymphoma (Linfocytic Lymphoma, LL, or MZL) and MCL not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy. Patients and methods. Inclusion criteria were: age 18–75 years, histological proven relapsed or refractory LL, MZL and MCL after 1–4 lines of therapies. Treatment plan was: one course of four weekly intravenous bolus of 1.6 mg/sqm Bortezomib in combination with four infusion of 375 mg/sqm Rituximab followed by two courses of four weekly bolus of 1.6 mg/sqm Bortezomib. Patients with complete (CR), partial remission (PR) and stable disease at the intermediate evaluation were planned to be given three further courses with the same schedule. Results. From September 2006 to March 2008, 55 patients entered into the study. Central histology revision was performed. Forty-nine patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and were evaluable. Clinical characteristics were: median age 68 (50-74) years; 16 LL, eight MZL, 25 MCL; 42 stage III/IV; 33 bone marrow involvement; 20 at intermediate-high/high International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk. Thirty-eigh patients performed more than two prior lines of chemotherapy; 34 were Rituximab-pretreated; 21 refractory and 28 relapsed disease. Overall Response Rate (ORR) was 53% (CR 26.5%, PR 26.5%); no response 43% and 4% off therapy for other causes. ORR by histology was: 37% in LL, 50% in MZL and 64% in MCL. ORR was not adversely affected by Rituximab pretreatment: Rituximab-pretreated 62% and Rituximab-naïve 33%. ORR was higher in relapsed patients compared with refractory ones: 64% and 38% (p .06). (Table 1). With a median follow-up of 25 months, 2-year Overall Survival (OS) was 80% (95%CI: 66–89) and 2-year PFS was 25% (95%CI: 14–38) (Figure 1A, 1B). Two-year PFS by histology was shown in Figure 1C. A total of 233 courses were delivered with a median of 4.7 courses/patient. Thirty patients completed the treatment plan; 19 did not due to progression disease in 13, adverse events in five (concomitant gastric neoplasia, neurotoxicity grade II, sepsis, pleural effusion and toxic death due to interstitial pneumonia). Grade 3–4 CTC haematological toxicity was rare: neutropenia in 5% of the courses and thrombocytopenia in Table 1. ORR (%) MCL/MZL/LL 64/50/37 Rituximab-pretreated/Rituximab-naive 62/33 N of prior therapies Disclosures: Off Label Use: The use of Bortezomib is off-label in Relapsed/Refractory Indolent Non-Follicular and Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Vitolo:Roche-Italy: Advisory committee; Celgene-Italy: Advisory committee; Janssen-Cilag: Lecture Fee.

Abstract 4028 BACKGROUND. The corner stone of the WHO classification and prognostic scores of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is the blast count in bone marrow. The standard cytology evaluation of at least 500 bone marrow cells is easy to perform, but some concerns arise about reproducibility of this method. Nowadays bone marrow trephine biopsy and flow cytometry are frequently considered for the diagnosis of MDS. However there is so far paucity of data comparing cytology, histology and flow cytometry in quantifying bone marrow blasts in order to differentiate non RAEB from BAEB-I and RAEB-II cases. AIM OF THE WORK. The Aim of the work was to analyse the differences and the prognostic impact of cytology, histology and flow cytometry in differentiating non RAEB from BAEB-I and RAEB-II. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Since 1999, clinical and laboratory data from 1256 new cases of MDS were prospectively recorded into the Piemonte MDS Registry. Blast count could be performed with the three different methods: BMC (bone marrow cytology) has been performed in 844 cases, BMH (bone marrow histology) in 874 cases, and BMF (bone marrow flow cytometry) in 636. In order to quantify blasts, immune-histochemistry evaluation of CD34+ cells was used in BMH, while both CD34+ and CD117+ cells were considered in BMF. Out of the total of the 636 patients analysed by BMF only 420 had an accurate and complete registration of CD34 and CD117 positivity and were considered for the present analysis. In two hundred and thirty six cases all three evaluations were contemporary available. The concordance of each diagnostic method with the others and their prognostic value were evaluated in both univariate and multivariate analyses. A comparison between BMC and BMH was available in 571 cases, between BMC and BMF in 228 cases, and between BMH and BMF in 279 cases. RESULTS. The disagreement in classifying patients as non-RAEB or RAEB-I or RAEB-II between BMC and BMH was 156/571 (27%), with BMH over-evaluating blasts in 114/571 cases (20%) and under-evaluating blasts in 42/571 cases (7%). The disagreement between BMC and BMF was 80/228 (35%), with BMF over-evaluating and under-evaluating blast percentage in comparison to BMC in 53/228 (23%) and in 27/228 (12%) cases respectively. The disagreement between BMH and BMF was present in 113/279 (41%), with BMF over-evaluating and under-evaluating blast percentage in comparison to BMH in 44/279 (16%) and in 69/279 (25%) cases respectively. In univariate analysis all three methods of quantifing blasts and differentiating non-RAEB from RAEB-I and RAEB-II retained an important prognostic value for both leukemic evolution and survival. However when the three models were tested in multivariate analysis in order to define the best predictor of leukemic evolution, BMC retained the best predictive value. CONCLUSIONS. When BMH or BMF are used instead of BMC in order differentiate non-RAEB from RAEB-I and RAEB-II, the shift to a different WHO category is evident in at least 30% of patients and BMH and BMF do not play the same role as BMC. BMC still remain the standard method to quantify blasts for classification and prognostic evaluation of MDS. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract 2316 Poster Board II-293 Introduction: DLBCL at diagnosis with an intermediate/high or high-risk score according to age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aa-IPI) had a dismal prognosis. High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was showed an effective salvage treatment for chemo-sensitive relapsed patients, but conflicting results were observed as first line treatment in randomized trials. The addition of Rituximab to standard chemotherapy significantly improved the outcome, but so far less data are available in young DLBCL patients with a poor prognosis. Aim of the analysis was to test the role of four important steps in first line treatment in DLBCL at poor prognosis: HDC and ASCT, Rituximab, new regimens as dose-dense chemotherapy MegaCEOP versus third generation MACOP-B chemotherapy, involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT), in 309 untreated patients & 61 years enrolled from 1986 to 2006 into four GIMURELL and IIL consecutive trials. Patients and methods: 42 patients were enrolled into a phase II study and treatead with: 12 weekly infusion of MACOP-B (methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, bleomycin) chemotherapy (Vitolo U, J Clin Oncol 1992); 40 patients into a phase II trial with 8 weekly MACOP-B as induction therapy, followed by HDC with 2 courses of MAD (mitoxantrone, high-dose cytarabine, dexametasone) and BEAM and ASCT (Vitolo U, J Clin Oncol 1997); 107 patients into a phase III randomized trial, 48 treated with high dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy with ASCT and 59 with 6 beweekly infusions of MegaCEOP (epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone), respectively (Vitolo U, Haematol 2005); 120 patients into a phase II trial with an induction phase with dose-dense chemoimmunotherapy Rituximab-MegaCEOP for 4 cycles followed by HDC with 2 courses of Rituximab-MAD and BEAM plus ASCT (Vitolo U, Haematol 2009). IF-RT was performed at the end of treatment as consolidation of bulky disease or residual disease. A Cox proportional hazard model was performed for Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) to estimate the HRs of the 4 treatment variables (with/without Rituximab, HDC + ASCT, new regimens vs third generation regimen MACOP-B, radiotherapy yes/not), adjusted by aa-IPI, age and sex. Results: All 309 patients were evaluable for clinical characteristics and for response evaluation: median age 44 years (15-60); 178 males and 131 females; 10% were at Low-Intermediate, 51% at Intermediate-High and 39% at High risk according to aa-IPI score; PS >2 59%, 96 31% had BM involvement, 53% bulky disease, 84% LDH >normal, 34% >2 extranodal sites and 12/19/69% stage II/III/IV respectively. Rituximab was performed in 120 patients; IF-RT in 108 patients. New generation regimens were performed in 227 patients, MACOP-B in 82. As intention to treat, ASCT was scheduled for 208 patients. ASCT was performed in 171 patients (82%), 39 did not because of: progression disease in 22, toxicity in 9 and poor mobilization in 6. Complete response at the end of treatment was achieved in 212 pts (69%), PR in 23 (7%), 57 (18%) did not respond and 17 (6%) died of toxicity. Secondary haematological malignancies or solid tumour were observed in only 3 patients. With a median follow-up of 10 years, 10-yr OS and 10-yr PFS rates were: 59% (95%CI: 53-65) and 48% (95%CI: 41-55). The Cox's multivariable model showed that long term survival was significantly improved in patients treated with Rituximab compared to those treated without immunotherapy (HR=0.36, 95% CI=0.21-0.63, p .0003) and in patients that underwent IF-RT (HR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.27-0.66, p .0002), while no clear benefit could be detected for new regimens vs MACOP-B (HR=0.86, 95%CI: 0.57-1.31, p .482) and for ASCT (HR=0.94, 95%CI: 0.62-1.41, p .751). No important differences were observed after stratification by IPI. Similar results were obtained for PFS. Discussion: the introduction of immunotherapy and the irradiation of involved fields have played a major role in the improvement of long term survival of young patients with untreated DLBCL at poor prognosis, while little, if any, benefit has derived from newer dose-dense regimens and from ASCT. Randomized trials are ongoing to evaluate the impact of HDC and ASCT supplemented with Rituximab in poor-prognosis DLBCL compared to standard or dose-dense chemoimmunotherapy in the Rituximab era. Disclosures: Vitolo: Roche:.

Abstract 1662 Poster Board I-688 Introduction Bendamustine is an alkylating agent with a nitrogen mustard group and a purine like benzimidazol group. Recently this drug was introduced in Italy. We analized all pts treated in sixteen haematological Italian centers with Bendamustine alone or in combination with anti-CD20 antibody. Patients and methods On an intention to treat basis pts who have received at least one complete cycle were evaluable for response and toxicity. The treatments consisted of: Bendamustine 60-90 mg/m2 days 1,2 alone or in combination with Rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 0, every 21 or 28 days. 173 pts were analized, median age was 67 (range 31-87), 114 were male, 63 chronic lymphatic leukaemia 41 indolent non-follicular lymphoma, 26 diffuse large B cell lymphoma, 26 follicular lymphoma, 15 mantle cell lymphoma, 2 Peripheral T cell lymphoma. Pts were heavily pretreated, the median number of previous treatments was 3,5 (range 1-8), 121 pts have experienced more than three chemotherapy schemes. One hundred and twenty-seven pts were previously treated with Rituximab and 24 performed an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The Bendamustine pre-treatment condition was: 70 relapsed pts, 40 with refractory disease and 63 with a progressive disease after partial response. The median number of Bendamustine cycles was 4.3 (range 1-11). Results All patients were evaluable for response: 48 pts (28%) obtained a complete remission, 78 (45%) a partial response or stable disease with an overall response rate of 73% and 47 were non responders. According to histotype we observed that 10/15 pts (67%) with mantle cell lymphoma obtained a response (6 CR;4 PR), 37/41 (9 CR; 28 PR) indolent non follicular lymphoma and 25/26 (96%) follicular lymphoma obtained a response (12 CR;13 PR), 46/63 CLL obtained a response and 8/26 (31%) DLBCL obtained a response to therapy (4 CR;4 PR), none of the two T lymphoma pts responded to therapy. With a median period of observation of 12 months (1-46) 121 (70%) pts are alive and 83 pts are in complete remission or with stable disease without any other treatment. The overall survival was 82%, 72%, 68% and 27% respectively for indolent, CLL, mantle cell and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The progression free survival was 31%, 27%, 15% and 10% respectively for indolent, CLL, mantle cell and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Fifthy-two pts died, 47 for progressive disease, 11 due to infection and sepsis (6%) and 2 due to other causes not related with therapy or disease. In this group of heavily pretreated pts 760 cycles were performed. The extrahematological toxicity was mild the most important problem were infections (Herpes Zooster, pneumonia, enteritis) reported in 16 pts, hepatic in 4 and cardiologic in 2 pts. The hematological toxicity was trombocytopenia grade 3-4 in 20 pts (12%), neutropenia grade 3-4 in 40 pts (23%) and anemia grade 3-4 in 19 pts (11%). Discussion In conclusion this retrospective study shows that treatment with Bendamustine alone or in combination with Rituximab is a safe and efficacy regimen in a subset of pluriresistent patients. This data shows also that the best results could be obtained in indolent lymphoma and CLL incouraging data in mantle cell lymphoma are reported. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.