Search

Background Despite hyperaldosteronism being suggested as predisposing to arrhythmias, the relationship between atrial fibrillation and primary aldosteronism remains uncertain. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that atrial fibrillation is a presentation of primary aldosteronism in hypertensive patients with unexplained atrial fibrillation. Design and methods The Prospective Appraisal on the Prevalence of Primary Aldosteronism in Hypertensive (PAPPHY) Study recruited consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation and an unambiguous diagnosis of arterial hypertension at three referral centers for hypertension. Results In a cohort entailing 411 atrial fibrillation patients, we identified 18% (age 61 ± 11 years; 32% women), who showed no known cause of the arrhythmia. A thorough diagnostic work-up allowed us to identify primary aldosteronism in 73 of these patients, i.e. 42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.8-53.9]. Subtyping of primary aldosteronism demonstrated that surgically curable forms of primary aldosteronism accounted for 48% of the cases (95% CI 31.9-65.2). The high prevalence of primary aldosteronism was confirmed at sensitivity analyses. Conclusion These results provided compelling evidence that primary aldosteronism is highly prevalent in hypertensive patients with unexplained atrial fibrillation. Accordingly, they suggest that patients with no identifiable cause of the arrhythmia should be screened for primary aldosteronism to identify those who can be cured or markedly improved with target treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: :: https://clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01267747.

A possible defect of guanosine 3'-5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) content in the renal tissue caused by an increased activity of cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) has, so far, not been evaluated in the pathogenesis of renal resistance to endogenous natriuretic peptides (ENP) in cirrhosis with ascites. To test this hypothesis the activity of cGMP-PDE and the concentration of cGMP were evaluated in vitro in the renal tissue of 10 control rats and 10 cirrhotic rats with ascites before and after the intravenous (IV) administration of Zaprinast (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), a specific cGMP-PDE inhibitor (30 microgram/kg/min). Moreover, the effects of the intravenous administration of Zaprinast (15 microgram/kg/min and 30 microgram/kg/min) on renal plasma flow (RPF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and urinary sodium excretion (U(Na)V) were evaluated in 10 conscious control rats and 10 conscious cirrhotic rats with ascites. The effects of Zaprinast on plasma renin activity (PRA) was also evaluated in 10 control rats and in 10 cirrhotic rats with ascites. Finally, the effect of Zaprinast on RPF, GFR, and U(Na)V were evaluated in 10 cirrhotic rats after the IV administration of the ENP-receptor antagonist, HS-142-1. The renal content of cGMP was reduced in cirrhotic rats because of increased activity of cGMP-PDE. Zaprinast inhibited cGMP-PDE activity and increased the renal content of cGMP in these animals. The inhibition of cGMP-PDE was associated with an increase in RPF, GFR, and U(Na)V and a reduction in PRA. HS-142-1 prevented any renal effect of Zaprinast in cirrhotic rats. In conclusion, an increased activity of the cGMP-PDE in renal tissue contributes to the renal resistance to ENP in cirrhosis with ascites.

The aim of this work was to study the prevalence of Q-T prolongation in patients with liver cirrhosis and the modifications of the Q-T interval after liver transplantation. Q-T interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) and dispersion of Q-T interval were evaluated in 75 cirrhotic patients and in 24 controls by means of a 12-lead electrocardiogram. In addition, 15 patients were evaluated before and after liver transplantation. Forty-five patients (60%) had a prolonged Q-Tc. Compared with controls, both patients with alcoholic and non alcoholic cirrhosis had increased Q-Tc (414±28 msec1/2, 463±31 and 444±32 respectively; p

Intravenous methylprednisolone is used in most liver transplant centers as first-line therapy of acute hepatic cellular rejection in patients who undergo liver transplant. However, no controlled study has been performed to date to define the optimal dose and duration of the steroid regimen. The schedules that actually are used in most transplant centers are drawn from those that were developed empirically for the treatment of acute renal graft rejection. Thus, the aim of the study was to compare two schedules of steroid treatment of acute hepatic cellular rejection among those most widely used. Thirty-eight eligible patients with grade II or III acute hepatic cellular rejection were randomized to receive two different high-dose methylprednisolone schedules. Eighteen patients were randomized in group A (intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone followed by a 6-day taper from 200 to 20 mg/d). Twenty patients were randomized in group B (intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone for three consecutive days). The response to treatment was evaluated by means of a second liver biopsy. The treatment of group A proved to be more effective than treatment of group B. The resolution of acute hepatic cellular rejection was observed in 83.3% of cases in group A and 50.0% of cases in group B (P

The aim of the study was to verify the effects of the administration of an inhibitor of the release of endogenous vasodilators together with a vasoconstrictor agent in patients with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). This new medical perspective was compared with a traditional medical approach for HRS, such as the infusion of nonpressor doses of dopamine to produce renal vasodilation. Thirteen patients with type 1 HRS were enrolled in the study. Five of them were treated with the oral administration of midodrine and the parenteral administration of octreotide. In addition, the patients received 50 to 100 mL of 20% human albumin solution daily for 20 days. Midodrine and octreotide were dosed to obtain a stable increase of at least 15 mm Hg of mean arterial pressure. Eight patients were treated with the intravenous administration of nonpressor doses of dopamine (2-4 micrograms/kg/min) and the same daily amount of albumin. After 20 days of treatment with midodrine and octreotide, an impressive improvement in renal plasma flow (RPF), glomerular filtration rate, and urinary sodium excretion was observed in patients. This was accompanied by a significant reduction in plasma renin activity, plasma vasopressin, and plasma glucagon. No side effects were observed. Three patients were discharged from the hospital. One of them successfully underwent liver transplantation. One of the two remaining patients is still alive after 472 days with a preserved renal function, and the other died from terminal liver failure after 76 days. One of the two patients who were not discharged from the hospital successfully underwent liver transplantation, and the other died from pneumonia after 29 days. Seven out of eight patients who were treated with dopamine experienced a progressive deterioration in renal function and died during the first 12 days. Only one patient recovered renal function and underwent liver transplantation. In conclusion, the long-term administration of midodrine and octreotide seems to be an effective and safe treatment of type 1 HRS in patients with cirrhosis.

The effects of the acute administration of arterial vasoconstrictors on renal plasma flow (RPF) and urinary sodium excretion (UNaV) in cirrhotic patients with ascites with or without hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) are still controversial. As a consequence, vasoconstrictors are not actually used in the treatment of renal sodium retention or HRS in these patients, regardless of the several lines of evidence suggesting that these renal functional abnormalities are related to a marked arterial vasodilation. The lack of an orally available effective arterial vasoconstrictor probably represents a further reason for this omission. Consequently, the present study was made to evaluate the acute effects of the oral administration of midodrine, an orally available -mimetic drug, on systemic and renal hemodynamics and on UNaV in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), left forearm blood flow (LFBF), left leg blood flow (LLBF), RPF, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), UNaV, plasma renin activity (PRA), plasma concentration of antidiuretic hormone (ADH), and the serum levels of nitrite and nitrate (NOx) were evaluated in 25 cirrhotic patients with ascites (17 without HRS and 8 with type 2 HRS) before and during the 6 hours following the oral administration of 15 mg of midodrine. During the first 3 hours after the drug administration, a significant increase in MAP (89.6 +/- 1.7 vs. 81.80 +/- 1.3 mm Hg; P < .0001) and SVR (1, 313.9 +/- 44.4 vs. 1,121.2 +/- 60.1 dyn . sec . cm-5; P < .0001) accompanied by a decrease in HR (69 +/- 2 vs. 77 +/- 3 bpm; P < .005) and CI (2,932.7 +/- 131.4 vs. 3,152.5 +/- 131.4 mL . min-1 . m2 BSA; P < .0025) was observed in patients without HRS. No change was observed in LFBF and LLBF. The improvement in systemic hemodynamics, which was also maintained during the the 3- to 6-hour period after midodrine administration, was accompanied by a significant increase in RPF (541.5 +/- 43.1 vs. 385.7 +/- 39.9 mL . min-1; P < .005), GFR (93.1 +/- 6.5 vs. 77.0 +/- 6.7 mL . min-1; P < .025), and UNaV (92.7 +/- 16.4 vs. 72.2 +/- 10.7 microEq . min-1; P < .025). In addition, a decrease in PRA (5.33 +/- 1.47 vs. 7.74 +/- 2.17 ng . mL-1 . h; P < .05), ADH (1.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.2 pg . mL-1; P < .05), and NOx (33.4 +/- 5.0 vs. 49.3 +/- 7.3 micromol-1; P < .05) was found. In patients with HRS, the effects of the drug on the systemic hemodynamics was smaller and shorter. Accordingly, regardless of a significant decrease in PRA (15.87 +/- 3.70 vs. 20.70 +/- 4.82 ng . mL-1 . h; P < .0025) in patients with HRS, no significant improvement was observed in RPF, GFR, or UNaV. In conclusion, the acute oral administration of midodrine is associated with a significant improvement in systemic hemodynamics in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites. As a result, renal perfusion and UNaV also improve in these patients. By contrast, midodrine only slightly improves systemic hemodynamics in patients with type 2 HRS, with no effect on renal hemodynamics and renal function.