Search

Study Objective To investigate the correlation between endometrial polyps (EPs) and chronic endometritis (CE). Design Single-center retrospective case-control study. Setting Academic center. Patients A total of 480 premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) were enrolled. Group A included 240 women suffering from EPs (diagnosed by hysteroscopy and histology), and group B included 240 patients without EPs at hysteroscopy. Interventions In group A, 2 separate samples were obtained from the EPs (group A polyps) and endometrium (group A endometrium). In group B, a single sample of endometrial tissue was evaluated (group B endometrium). All tissue samples were subjected to immunohistochemistry for CD-138 for plasma cell identification. Measurements and Main Results The primary study endpoint was to compare the rates of CE in group A endometrium versus group B endometrium. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the consistency in CD-138 immunoreactivity between group A polyps and compared with group A endometrium. A higher prevalence of CE was observed in group A endometrium compared with group B endometrium (p Conclusions EPs were commonly associated with CE in the premenopausal women suffering from AUB. Moreover, the majority of EPs were positive for CD-138 staining, suggesting a possible hidden association between chronic inflammation and EPs.

Paget's disease can arise in the breast (mammary Paget disease) or in other locations (extramammary Paget disease) such as anogenital skin in both males and females (Paget disease of the vulva [PDV]). Underlying adenocarcinoma can be found in some cases. This study aims to report clinical aspects, surgical procedures, outcomes, and recurrences of patients with PDV. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of PDV managed at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari, and the “Giovanni Paolo II” National Cancer Institute in Bari, between 1998 and 2018. Records of 24 cases of PDV were examined. Median age of the patients at diagnosis was 69.3 (range 38–84), diagnosis of synchronous cancer was made in 2 cases and in 2 other cases of metachronous disease. Three patients had previously been diagnosed with other oncological diseases. All patients underwent surgery including wide local excision (6), simple vulvectomy (8), and extended vulvectomy (10). Lymphadenectomy was performed in 2 cases and reconstructions with advancement flaps in 7 cases. Four patients were found to have invasive disease and 1 had inguinal node involvement. Positive margins were found in 11 patients. Wound dehiscence and urethral stenosis were found in 4 and 1 case each. Eight recurrences (33.33%) were observed, regardless of positive surgical margins. PDV has a low rate of malignancy but a high rate of recurrence. It should be diagnosed early to avoid repeated surgery and to reduce symptoms and morbidity.

Objective: To develop a consensus on the diagnostic criteria for chronic endometritis (CE) at hysteroscopy (HSC), and to evaluate these proposed criteria in a randomized-controlled observer study. Design: Systematic review of studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of HSC in CE diagnosis; Delphi consensus on hysteroscopic diagnostic criteria for CE; randomized-controlled observer study to evaluate the reproducibility of the proposed diagnostic criteria. Setting: Not applicable. Participant(s): Experts from different countries were involved in the systematic review and contributed to the Delphi consensus. Physicians from different countries were involved in the observer study. Intervention(s): After reaching consensus on the diagnostic criteria, the Delphi poll created a questionnaire including 100 hysteroscopic pictures (50 from women with CE [domain 1] and 50 from women without CE [domain 2]), with a single question per picture (Answer_A: suggestive of CE; answer B: not suggestive of CE). A total of 200 physicians were invited to take part in the observer study. Before completing the questionnaire, physicians were randomized to receive a description of the diagnostic criteria (group A) or no such information (group B). Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was to compare the questionnaire scores for the two groups of observers. The secondary outcome was to assess the interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of CE in each group. Result(s): A total of 126 physicians completed the questionnaire (62 in group A and 64 in group B). Observers in group A obtained higher total scores compared with those in group B (P