Search

Baseline gene expression analysis of B cell lymphoma cell lines with higher (IC50 < 200 nM) or lower sensitive (IC50 > 400 nM) to PQR309.

Purpose: Activation of the PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway is recurrent in different lymphoma types, and pharmacologic inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR pathway has shown activity in lymphoma patients. Here, we extensively characterized the in vitro and in vivo activity and the mechanism of action of PQR309 (bimiralisib), a novel oral selective dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor under clinical evaluation, in preclinical lymphoma models.Experimental Design: This study included preclinical in vitro activity screening on a large panel of cell lines, both as single agent and in combination, validation experiments on in vivo models and primary cells, proteomics and gene-expression profiling, and comparison with other signaling inhibitors.Results: PQR309 had in vitro antilymphoma activity as single agent and in combination with venetoclax, panobinostat, ibrutinib, lenalidomide, ARV-825, marizomib, and rituximab. Sensitivity to PQR309 was associated with specific baseline gene-expression features, such as high expression of transcripts coding for the BCR pathway. Combining proteomics and RNA profiling, we identified the different contribution of PQR309-induced protein phosphorylation and gene expression changes to the drug mechanism of action. Gene-expression signatures induced by PQR309 and by other signaling inhibitors largely overlapped. PQR309 showed activity in cells with primary or secondary resistance to idelalisib.Conclusions: On the basis of these results, PQR309 appeared as a novel and promising compound that is worth developing in the lymphoma setting. Clin Cancer Res; 24(1); 120–9. ©2017 AACR.

Supplementary figures, table legends, Table S1, S9 Figure S1. In vitro antitumor activity of the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor apitolisib and its correlation with PQR309. Figure S2. Antitumor In vivo activity of PQR309 in the treatment of RI-1 and SU-DHL-6 xenograft model. Figure S3. Apoptosis is induced by co-treatment of PQR309 with venetoclax or panobinostat in primary cells and in the DLBCL SU-DHL-6 cell line. Figure S4. Specific baseline gene expression signatures are associated with higher or lower sensitivity to PQR309. Figure S5. In vitro antitumor activity of the PI3K� inhibitor idelalisib and its correlation with PQR309. Figure S6. PQR309 induced decrease in phosphorylation of AKT-Ser473 and p70S6K-Thr389 in DLBCL cell lines. Figure S7. PQR309 reduces AKT-Ser473 phosphorylation in lymphoma cell lines. Figure S8. Transcriptional expression signature of ABC DLBCL cell lines induced by PQR309. Figure S9. ABC and GCB DLBCL PQR309-treated signatures were highly overlapping. Figure S10. Transcript expression levels of PQR309-treated samples. Figure S11. Changes in protein phosphorylation and RNA expression differently contribute to PQR309 affected biologic pathways in ABC DLBCL. Figure S12. PQR309 can largely regulate the same genes affected by the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib, the PI3K� idelalisib, the dual PI3K�/� inhibitor duvelisib (A), the dual PI3K�/� inhibitor AZD8835 or the AKT inhibitor AZD5363 (B). Figure S13. BCR pathway signature is similarly affected after ibrutinib, idelalisib and duvelisib treatments in ABC DLBCL cell lines. Figure S14. The dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor PQR309 and the PIM inhibitor AZD1208 synergize in DLBCL cell lines. Supplementary Table 1. List of phosphoresidues investigated by Carna Bioscience to perform RPPA analysis. Supplementary Table 9. Transcripts differentially expressed in ABC DLBCL cell lines treated with ibrutinib (A), idelalisib (B) or duvelisib (C) versus DMSO.

BTK and PI3K inhibitors are among the drugs approved for the treatment of patients with lymphoid neoplasms. Although active, their ability to lead as single agents to long-lasting complete remission is rather limited especially in the lymphoma setting. This indicates that tumor cells often develop resistance to the drugs. Here, we show that the overexpression of ERBB4 and its ligands represents a modality for B cell neoplastic cells to bypass the anti-tumor activity of BTK and PI3K inhibitors and that targeted pharmacological interventions can restore sensitivity to the small molecules.We started from a marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) cell line, Karpas-1718, kept under prolonged exposure to the PI3Kδ inhibitor idelalisib until acquisition of resistance, or with no drug. Cells underwent transcriptome, miRNA and methylation profiling, whole exome sequencing, and pharmacological screening which led to the identification of the overexpression of ERBB4 and its ligands HBEGF and NRG2 in the resistant cells. Cellular and genetic experiments demonstrated the involvement of this axis in blocking the anti-tumor activity of various BTK and PI3K inhibitors, currently used in the clinical setting. Addition of recombinant HBEGF induced resistance to BTK and PI3K inhibitors in parental cells but also in additional lymphoma models. Combination with the ERBB inhibitor lapatinib was beneficial in resistant cells and in other lymphoma models already expressing the identified resistance factors. Multi-omics analysis underlined that an epigenetic reprogramming affected the expression of the resistance-related factors, and pretreatment with demethylating agents or EZH2 inhibitors overcame the resistance. Resistance factors were shown to be expressed in clinical samples, further extending the findings of the study.In conclusions, we identified a novel ERBB4-driven mechanism of resistance to BTK and PI3K inhibitors and treatments that appear to overcome it.Key pointsA mechanism of secondary resistance to the PI3Kδ and BTK inhibitors in B cell neoplasms driven by secreted factors.Resistance can be reverted by targeting ERBB signaling.

PI3Kδ inhibitors are active in patients with lymphoid neoplasms and a first series of them have been approved for the treatment of multiple types of B-cell lymphoid tumors, including marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). The identification of the mechanisms underlying either primary or secondary resistance is fundamental to optimize the use of novel drugs. Here we present a model of secondary resistance to PI3Kδ inhibitors obtained by prolonged exposure of a splenic MZL cell line to idelalisib. The VL51 cell line was kept under continuous exposure to idelalisib. The study included detailed characterization of the model, pharmacological screens, silencing experiments, and validation experiments on multiple cell lines and on clinical specimens. VL51 developed resistance to idelalisib, copanlisib, duvelisib, and umbralisib. An integrative analysis of transcriptome and methylation data highlighted an enrichment of upregulated transcripts and low-methylated promoters in resistant cells, including IL-6/STAT3- and PDGFRA-related genes and surface CD19 expression, alongside the repression of the let-7 family of miRNA, and miR-125, miR-130, miR-193 and miR-20. The IL-6R blocking antibody tocilizumab, the STAT3 inhibitor stattic, the LIN28 inhibitor LIN1632, the PDGFR inhibitor masitinib and the anti-CD19 antibody drug conjugate loncastuximab tesirine were active compounds in the resistant cells as single agents and/or in combination with PI3Kδ inhibition. Findings were validated on additional in vitro lymphoma models and on clinical specimens. A novel model of resistance obtained from splenic MZL allowed the identification of therapeutic approaches able to improve the antitumor activity of PI3Kδ inhibitors in B-cell lymphoid tumors.

Background: PI3Kδ is expressed in B cells and has a central role in the B-cell receptor signaling. Copanlisib is a highly selective PI3Kδ and PI3Kα inhibitor, and it is currently under clinical development in indolent lymphomas including marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Copanlisib is Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Nevertheless, a subset of patients can eventually relapse due to acquired resistance. A better understanding of resistance mechanisms could help to design improved therapies; hence, we generated MZL cell lines resistant to copanlisib. Materials and Methods: Cells were kept on copanlisib (IC90) until acquisition of resistance (RES) or with no drug (parental, PAR). Stable resistance was confirmed by MTT assay after 3 weeks of drug-free culture. Multidrug resistance phenotype was ruled out by confirming sensitivity to vincristine. Cells underwent transcriptome profiling (RNA-Seq) and immunophenotypic analysis. Results: The RES models were obtained from VL51 cell line with over 50-fold times higher IC50s than PAR counterparts. Of note, the copanlisib-resistant lines showed decreased sensitivity to other PI3K inhibitors such as duvelisib (50-fold) and idelalisib (5-fold) and to the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (15-fold), suggesting that the mechanism observed here might drive resistance to other downstream B-cell receptor inhibitors. Gene expression profiles of RES showed the upregulation of cytokine signaling (IL1A, IL1B, CXCR4), NFkB (LTA, TNF), MAPK (RASGRP4, RASGRP2), and JAK-STAT (STAT3, JAK3) signaling pathways and negative regulators of apoptosis (CD44, JUN). Conversely, repressed genes in RES were involved in cell adhesion (ITGA4, ITGB1), antigen presentation (HLAs), and IFN response (PARP12, GBP6). Consistent with the overexpression of antiapoptotic signaling genes, RES cells exhibited also resistance to the BCL2-inhibitor venetoclax, either as a single as in combination with copanlisib. Flow cytometry confirmed the CXCR4 upregulation and the downregulation of CD49d (ITGA4), paired with reduced CD20 and CD81 surface expression. In accordance, addition of a CXCR4 inhibitor overcame resistance to copanlisib. Conclusions: We created a model of secondary resistance to the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib, derived from an MZL cell line. This model will help in clarifying mechanisms of resistance to the drug and to evaluate alternative therapeutic approaches. Indeed, we already identified novel potential targets, such as IL1 and CXCR4, that might be exploited in overcoming resistance to copanlisib and are worthy of further investigation. Citation Format: Alberto J. Arribas, Sara Napoli, Luciano Cascione, Eugenio Gaudio, Roberta Bordone-Pittau, Marilia Barreca, Giulio Sartori, Chiara Tarantelli, Filippo Spriano, Andrea Rinaldi, Anastasios Stathis, Georg Stussi, Davide Rossi, Emanuele Zucca, Francesco Bertoni. Mechanisms of resistance to the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib in marginal zone lymphoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Meeting: Advances in Malignant Lymphoma; 2020 Aug 17-19. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2020;1(3_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-46.

Purpose: Activation of the PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway is recurrent in different lymphoma types, and pharmacologic inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR pathway has shown activity in lymphoma patients. Here, we extensively characterized the in vitro and in vivo activity and the mechanism of action of PQR309 (bimiralisib), a novel oral selective dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor under clinical evaluation, in preclinical lymphoma models.Experimental Design: This study included preclinical in vitro activity screening on a large panel of cell lines, both as single agent and in combination, validation experiments on in vivo models and primary cells, proteomics and gene-expression profiling, and comparison with other signaling inhibitors.Results: PQR309 had in vitro antilymphoma activity as single agent and in combination with venetoclax, panobinostat, ibrutinib, lenalidomide, ARV-825, marizomib, and rituximab. Sensitivity to PQR309 was associated with specific baseline gene-expression features, such as high expression of transcripts coding for the BCR pathway. Combining proteomics and RNA profiling, we identified the different contribution of PQR309-induced protein phosphorylation and gene expression changes to the drug mechanism of action. Gene-expression signatures induced by PQR309 and by other signaling inhibitors largely overlapped. PQR309 showed activity in cells with primary or secondary resistance to idelalisib.Conclusions: On the basis of these results, PQR309 appeared as a novel and promising compound that is worth developing in the lymphoma setting. Clin Cancer Res; 24(1); 120–9. ©2017 AACR.