Search

Aims: The drive toward more sensitive LC–MS assays has resulted in long, complex methods. We assessed next-generation trypsins to identify a suitable candidate to integrate into protein LC–MS method development strategies, to simplify methods and increase throughput. Materials & methods: The performance of commercially available next-generation trypsins was assessed based on the digestion of protein standards in buffer and complex matrix by LC–high-resolution MS. Results: The performance of all next-generation trypsins assessed exceeded that of an overnight tryptic digest in a fraction of the time. Performing reduction and alkylation prior to digestion with heat-stable trypsins may be beneficial and should be investigated. Conclusion: Promega Rapid-Digestion Trypsin is the best-performing next-generation trypsin, surpassing an overnight tryptic digestion.

The 15th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (15th WRIB) was held on 27 September to 1 October 2021. Even with a last-minute move from in-person to virtual, an overwhelmingly high number of nearly 900 professionals representing pharma and biotech companies, contract research organizations (CROs), and multiple regulatory agencies still eagerly convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 15th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on biomarker assay development and validation (BAV) (focused on clarifying the confusion created by the increased use of the term “Context of Use – COU”); mass spectrometry of proteins (therapeutic, biomarker and transgene); state-of-the-art cytometry innovation and validation; and, critical reagent and positive control generation were the special features of the 15th edition. This 2021 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2021 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 1A) covers the recommendations on Endogenous Compounds, Small Molecules, Complex Methods, Regulated Mass Spec of Large Molecules, Small Molecule, PoC. Part 1B covers the Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine. Part 2 (ISR for Biomarkers, Liquid Biopsies, Spectral Cytometry, Inhalation/Oral & Multispecific Biotherapeutics, Accuracy/LLOQ for Flow Cytometry) and Part 3 (TAb/NAb, Viral Vector CDx, Shedding Assays; CRISPR/Cas9 & CAR-T Immunogenicity; PCR & Vaccine Assay Performance; ADA Assay Comparabil ity & Cut Point Appropriateness) are published in volume 14 of Bioanalysis, issues 10 and 11 (2022), respectively.

Gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccine research have led to an increased use of qPCR/ddPCR in bioanalytical laboratories. CROs are progressively undertaking the development and validation of qPCR and ddPCR assays. Currently, however, there is limited regulatory guidance for the use of qPCR and a complete lack of any regulatory guidelines for the use of the newer ddPCR to support regulated bioanalysis. Hence, the Global CRO Council in Bioanalysis (GCC) has issued this White Paper to provide; 1) a consensus on the different validation parameters required to support qPCR/ddPCR assays; 2) a harmonized approach to their validation and 3) a consistent development of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for all the bioanalytical laboratories using these techniques.

The 15th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (15th WRIB) was held on 27 September to 1 October 2021. Even with a last-minute move from in-person to virtual, an overwhelmingly high number of nearly 900 professionals representing pharma and biotech companies, contract research organizations (CROs), and multiple regulatory agencies still eagerly convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 15th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on biomarker assay development and validation (BAV) (focused on clarifying the confusion created by the increased use of the term "Context of Use - COU"); mass spectrometry of proteins (therapeutic, biomarker and transgene); state-of-the-art cytometry innovation and validation; and, critical reagent and positive control generation were the special features of the 15th edition. This 2021 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2021 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 1A) covers the recommendations on Endogenous Compounds, Small Molecules, Complex Methods, Regulated Mass Spec of Large Molecules, Small Molecule, PoC. Part 1B covers the Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, GeneCell Therapy and Vaccine. Part 2 (ISR for Biomarkers, Liquid Biopsies, Spectral Cytometry, Inhalation/OralMultispecific Biotherapeutics, Accuracy/LLOQ for Flow Cytometry) and Part 3 (TAb/NAb, Viral Vector CDx, Shedding Assays; CRISPR/Cas9CAR-T Immunogenicity; PCRVaccine Assay Performance; ADA Assay Comparabil ityCut Point Appropriateness) are published in volume 14 of Bioanalysis, issues 10 and 11 (2022), respectively.

Gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccine research have led to an increased need to perform cellular immunity testing in a regulated environment to ensure the safety and efficacy of these treatments. The most common method for the measurement of cellular immunity has been Enzyme-Linked Immunospot assays. However, there is a lack of regulatory guidance available discussing the recommendations for developing and validating these types of assays. Hence, the Global CRO Council has issued this white paper to provide a consensus on the different validation parameters required to support Enzyme-Linked Immunospot assays and a harmonized and consistent approach to Enzyme-Linked Immunospot validation among contract research organizations.

It is common practice to utilize an internal standard (IS) to minimize variance in bioanalytical assays employing liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. For assays to be deployed in regulated drug development studies, ensuring the IS will compensate for differences in recovery, liquid handling and ionization efficiency should be determined early in the method development process. In this perspective article, we outline key considerations when selecting an IS and propose experiments to perform within the method development phase to demonstrate suitability of the IS within the assay prior to validation. Finally, a series of case studies will be presented, which illustrate analytical challenges related to internal standardization that we have observed in our laboratory.

IntroductionHyperglucagonemia is a key pathophysiological driver of type 2 diabetes. Although Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a highly effective treatment for diabetes, it is presently unclear how surgery alters glucagon physiology. The aim of this study was to characterize the behavior of proglucagon-derived peptide (glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), oxyntomodulin, glicentin) secretion after RYGB surgery.Research design and methodsProspective study of 19 patients with obesity and pre-diabetes/diabetes undergoing RYGB. We assessed the glucose, insulin, GLP-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), oxyntomodulin, glicentin and glucagon responses to a mixed-meal test (MMT) before and 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery. Glucagon was measured using a Mercodia glucagon ELISA using the ‘Alternative’ improved specificity protocol, which was validated against a reference liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry method.ResultsAfter RYGB, there were early improvements in fasting glucose and glucose tolerance and the insulin response to MMT was accelerated and amplified, in parallel to significant increases in postprandial GLP-1, oxyntomodulin and glicentin secretion. There was a significant decrease in fasting glucagon levels at the later time points of 3 and 12 months after surgery. Glucagon was secreted in response to the MMT preoperatively and postoperatively in all patients and there was no significant change in this postprandial secretion. There was no significant change in GIP secretion.ConclusionsThere is a clear difference in the dynamics of secretion of proglucagon peptides after RYGB. The reduction in fasting glucagon secretion may be one of the mechanisms driving later improvements in glycemia after RYGB.Trial registration numberNCT01945840.

Aim: LC–MS/MS bottom-up quantitation of proteins has become increasingly popular with trypsin as the most commonly used protease. However, trypsin does not always yield suitable surrogate peptides. An alternative enzyme, Glu-C, was used to generate surrogate peptides for quantifying a bispecific IgG1 biotherapeutic antibody in preclinical matrices. Materials and methods: IgG1 was quantified by pellet digestion using an Acquity UPLC coupled with a Xevo TQ-S mass spectrometer. Results: Two generic LC–MS/MS methods (heavy and light chain) were developed which afforded acceptable precision and accuracy, and an lower limit of quantitation of 1 μg/ml in three preclinical matrices. A small nonsignificant bias was observed when cynomolgus serum LC–MS/MS results were compared with electrochemiluminescent immunoassay data. Conclusion: Glu-C was successfully used as an alternative digestion enzyme for bottom-up quantitation of an IgG1 in matrices from multiple preclinical species, with good agreement with electrochemiluminescent immunoassay data.

Quantification of oligonucleotide strands from rat plasma has been assessed on two tandem quadrupole systems and a TOF-MS platform following a novel ion-exchange solid-phase extraction and ion-pair chromatographic separation. Limits of quantification are comparable across all three systems with excellent signal-to-noise and accuracy and precision data realised on the TOF-MS to 10 ng/mL. Despite the advances in tandem quadrupole performance in recent years this has not translated into a marked improvement in the detection limits on this instrument geometry. This may prove to be a feature of the tandem MS process for oligonucleotides and could limit the ability to realise lower detection limits on these types of instruments.

A novel approach has been developed for the quantitative determination of circulating drug concentrations in clinical studies using dried plasma spots (DPS) on paper substrates, rather than conventional plasma samples. A quantitative bioanalytical high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) assay has been validated using paroxetine as a tool compound (range 0.2-200 ng/mL human plasma). The assay employed simple solvent extraction of a punched disk taken from the DPS sample, followed by reversed phase HPLC separation, combined with multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometric detection. In addition to performing routine experiments to establish the validity of the assay to internationally accepted criteria (precision, accuracy, linearity, sensitivity, selectivity), experiments are included to assess the effect of the volume of plasma spotted and the use of an indicating paper. The validated DPS approach was successfully applied to a clinical study utilizing pooled samples and a direct comparison of DPS and plasma was made (single oral dose of 37.5 mg of paroxetine).