Search

ObjectiveAlthough gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is considered a promising technique for the management of refractory gastroparesis, high-quality evidence is limited. We prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of G-POEM in unselected patients with refractory gastroparesis.DesignIn five tertiary centres, patients with symptomatic gastroparesis refractory to standard medical therapy and confirmed by impaired gastric emptying were included. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined as at least one score decrease in Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) with ≥25% decrease in two subscales, at 12 months. GCSI Score and subscales, adverse events (AEs) and 36-Item Short Form questionnaire of quality of life were evaluated at baseline and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after G-POEM. Gastric emptying study was performed before and 3 months after the procedure.ResultsOf 80 enrolled patients, 75 patients (94%) completed 12-month follow-up. Clinical success at 12 months was 56% (95% CI, 44.8 to 66.7). GCSI Score (including subscales) improved moderately after G-POEM (p2.6 (OR=3.23, p=0.04) and baseline gastric retention >20% at 4 hours (OR=3.65, p=0.03) were independent predictors of clinical success at 12 months, as was early response to G-POEM at 1 month after therapy (OR 8.75, pConclusionG-POEM is a safe procedure, but showed only modest overall effectiveness in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis. Further studies are required to identify the best candidates for G-POEM; unselective use of this procedure should be discouraged.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Registry NCT02732821.

Background and Aims Endoluminal functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP) is an imaging tool that measures the physiologic characteristics of GI sphincters. In this study, we used EndoFLIP to evaluate the association between the pyloric physiologic measurements and the clinical outcomes of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) in patients with refractory gastroparesis. Methods Thirty-seven patients from 5 centers who underwent G-POEM for management of refractory gastroparesis and had EndoFLIP measurements were evaluated. Cross-sectional area (CSA), balloon pressure, and the distensibility index (DI) of the pylorus were evaluated by EndoFLIP at 40 mL and 50 mL balloon fills before and after G-POEM. One-year clinical success and change in gastric emptying study 3 months after the G-POEM procedure were compared with the EndoFLIP measurements. Results Clinical success was achieved in 26 (70%) patients. Post–G-POEM CSA and DI were significantly higher in the clinical success group with both 40-mL volume distension (CSA: 89.9 ± 64.8 vs 172.5 ± 71.9 mm2, P =.003; DI: 5.8 ± 4.4 vs 8.8 ± 6.1 mm2/mm Hg, P =.043) and 50-mL volume distention (CSA: 140.1 ± 89.9 vs 237.5 ± 80.3 mm2, P =.003; DI: 5.6 ± 3.3 vs 9.9 ± 6.6 mm2/mm Hg, P =.049). CSA using 40-mL volume distention with an area under the curve of 0.83 yielded a specificity of 91% and a sensitivity of 71% at a cutoff point of 154 mm2. Conclusions Post–G-POEM CSA of the pylorus is associated with clinical success and improvement in a gastric emptying scan after G-POEM. EndoFLIP measurements of the pylorus have the potential to be used as a tool to predict the clinical outcome of G-POEM.

Aims Diabetic gastroparesis may be associated with impaired nitric oxide metabolism and reduced tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) synthesis. Oral treatment with CNSA-001 (sepiapterin, currently known as PTC923) increased BH4 levels in humans in a previous study. This Phase 2 study evaluated CNSA-001 in women with diabetic gastroparesis. Methods Non-pregnant diabetic women with moderate/severe symptomatic gastroparesis, delayed gastric emptying, and impaired gastric accommodation (nutrient satiety testing) were randomized to 10 mg/kg BID CNSA-001 or matching placebo for 14 days. The primary endpoint was change in gastric accommodation (maximal tolerated liquid meal volume) at 14- and 28-days' follow-up. Results Gastric accommodation improved in CNSA-001-treated vs. placebo-treated subjects at 28 days (least squares mean [LSM] difference: 98 [95% CI 36 to 161], p = 0.0042). Subjects' ratings of bloating, fullness, nausea, and pain were lower vs. baseline in the CNSA-001 group at 14 and 28 days, though these improvements were not observed consistently in placebo-treated subjects. There were no significant group differences in upper gastrointestinal symptom scores, and in gastric emptying breath test parameters. CNSA-001 was well tolerated, with no withdrawals for adverse events. Conclusions CNSA-001 improved gastric accommodation in women with diabetic gastroparesis. Further evaluation of CNSA-001 in gastroparesis is warranted; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03712124 .

It is estimated that 30% of patients with gastroparesis will need enteral feeding at some point in their disease. Indications for enteric feeding include loss of 5–10% of usual body weight over 3–6 months, and numerous admissions for hypovolemia and electrolyte abnormalities due to nausea and vomiting. Enteral feeding provides reliable nutrition, hydration, liquid medication and possible palliative decompression while alternative therapies for gastroparesis are being explored. The type and route need to be individualized based upon length of intended therapy, need for gastric decompression and feasibility of the technique. These procedures are performed by gastroenterologists, surgeons and radiologists. To date, studies comparing feeding tube placement approach and technique in gastroparesis have not been performed. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages and the chosen approach and technique must be individualized based on symptoms, institutional expertise and medical comorbidities. The role of nutrition support professionals is crucial in the initiation and management of tube feeds for replenishing nutrients, including vitamins and minerals, with the goal of eventually re-establishing oral nutrition.