Search

Adverse outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been associated with preoperative psychological disorders and poor mental health. We aimed to investigate and quantify the association between preoperative mental health and 1) postoperative 90-day health care utilization; and 2) 1-year patient-reported outcomes after primary TKA.Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent primary elective TKA (n = 7,476) was performed. Preoperative mental health was evaluated using Veterans Rand-12 Mental Composite Scores (VR-12 MCS). Outcomes included prolonged length of stay (2-days), nonhome discharge, 90-day readmissions, emergency department visits, and reoperation. Improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) achievement were evaluated at 1-year. Multivariable regression was implemented to explore associations between preoperative VR-12 MCS and outcomes of interest.A total of 5,402 (72.3%) completed 1-year follow-up. Lower preoperative VR-12 MCS was associated with higher odds of prolonged length of stay (MCS 20-39: odds ratio (OR): 1.46;P.001), and nonhome discharge disposition (MCS 20-39: OR: 1.92;P.001), but not 90-day readmission or reoperation (MCS20-39; P = .12 and P = .64). At 1-year, patients with a lower MCS were less likely to attain a substantial clinical benefit in KOOS-pain (MCS 0-19; OR: 0.25; P.001) and less likely to achieve PASS (MCS20-39; OR: 0.74; P = .002). Patients with an MCS60 were more likely to be discharged home (OR: 1.42; P = .008), achieve substantial clinical benefit in their KOOS-JR (OR: 1.16; P = .027),-Pain (OR: 1.220; P = .007) and PASS at 1-year (OR: 1.28; P = .008).Lower VR-12 MCS is associated with increased postoperative health care utilization and worse patient-reported outcome measures at 1-year post-TKA. These findings suggest that a VR-12 MCS ≤40 could be used to designate increased risk, guide the preoperative discussion and potential interventions.

To evaluate whether the involvement of surgeons-in-training was associated with increased infection rates, including both prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and surgical site infection (SSI), following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).This was a retrospective review of outcomes following primary total knee arthroplasty. Surgeries were divided into two groups: (a) attending-only and (b) trainee-involved. Association with PJI and SSI were evaluated with univariate analysis and multivariate analysis to adjust for sex, age, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), year of surgery, operative time, and hospital/surgeon volume.A single, large North-American integrated healthcare system between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017.A total of 12,664 primary TKAs with a minimum of one-year (mean of 2-years, range 1-4.5) follow-up were evaluated.Residents and fellows were more likely to participate in cases with longer operative times (p0.001) than the attending-only group. A significant difference existed on univariate analysis between the trainee-involved group and attending-only group for PJI incidence (p=0.015) but not for SSI (p=0.840). After adjusting for patient- and procedure-related features, however, neither PJI nor SSI were independently associated with trainee involvement (PJI: p=0.089; SSI: p=0.998).Trainee participation did not directly correlate with increased infection risk, despite their association with longer-operative times and increased medical complexity. Further approaches to mitigating the risk of SSI and PJI for patients with increased comorbidities and in complex TKA cases, which demand longer operative times, are still required.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: 8.5 to 50% of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients are reported to have preoperative malnutrition. The narrative review identifies the relationship between preoperative malnutrition for TJA patients and postoperative outcomes as well as the use of perioperative nutritional intervention to improve postoperative complications. RECENT FINDINGS: Biochemical/laboratory, anthropometric, and clinical measures have been widely used to identify preoperative nutritional deficiency. Specifically, serum albumin is the most prevalent used marker in TJA because it has been proven to be correlated with protein-energy malnutrition due to the surgical stress response. However, there remains a sustained incidence of preoperative malnutrition in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients due to a lack of agreement among the available nutritional screening tools and utilization of isolated laboratory, anthropometric, and clinical variables. Previous investigations have also suggested preoperative malnutrition to be a prognostic indicator of complications in general, cardiac, vascular, and orthopaedic surgery specialties. SUMMARY: Serum albumin, prealbumin, transferrin, and total lymphocyte count (TLC) can be used to identify at-risk patients. It is important to employ these markers in the preoperative setting because malnourished TKA and THA patients have shown to have worse postoperative outcomes including prolonged length, increased reoperation rates, increased infection rates, and increased mortality rates. Although benefits from high-protein and high-anti-inflammatory diets have been exhibited, additional research is needed to confirm the use of perioperative nutritional intervention as an appropriate treatment for preoperative TJA patients.

The purpose of this case report was to demonstrate the utility, versatility, and efficacy of robotic-arm technology in complex primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases for acetabular bone loss, hip dysplasia, and post-traumatic arthritis with hardware. Preoperative computer templating allows precise and accurate acetabular and femoral stem positioning in cases that presented with significant native deformity and bone loss. Robotic-arm THA may be a viable option for complex primary cases to optimize implant positioning and mitigate postoperative instability and complications.

Value-based orthopaedic surgery and reimbursement changes for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are potential factors shaping arthroplasty practice nationwide. This study aimed to evaluate (1) trends in discharge disposition (home vs nonhome discharge), (2) episode-of-care outcomes for home and nonhome discharge cohorts, and (3) predictors of nonhome discharge among patients undergoing TKA from 2011 to 2020. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was reviewed for all primary TKAs from 2011 to 2020. A total of 462,858 patients were identified and grouped into home discharge (n = 378,771) and nonhome discharge (n = 84,087) cohorts. The primary outcome was the annual rate of home/nonhome discharges. Secondary outcomes included trends in health care utilization parameters, readmissions, and complications. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with nonhome discharge. Overall, 82% were discharged home, and 18% were discharged to a nonhome facility. Home discharge rates increased from 65.5% in 2011 to 94% in 2020. Nonhome discharge rates decreased from 34.5% in 2011 to 6% in 2020. Thirty-day readmissions decreased from 3.2 to 2.4% for the home discharge cohort but increased from 5.6 to 6.1% for the nonhome discharge cohort. Female sex, Asian or Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class > II, Charlson comorbidity index scores > 0, smoking, dependent functional status, and age > 60 years were associated with higher odds of nonhome discharge. Over the last decade, there has been a major shift to home discharge after TKA. Future work is needed to further assess if perioperative interventions may have a positive effect in decreasing adverse outcomes in nonhome discharge patients.

In staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA), the intersurgical time is yet to be determined. This study aimed to (1) test for differences in in-hospital metrics between the index and contralateral TKA and (2) determine the safest intersurgical time interval to minimize adverse outcomes after the contralateral surgery. The National Readmissions Database was queried for patients who received staged BTKA (2016–2017). A total of 20,279 patients were included. Demographics, comorbidities, baseline determinants, and intersurgical time between index and contralateral TKAs (≤ 3 month, 4–6 months, 7–9 months, and 10–12 months intervals) were captured. Outcomes included healthcare utilization (length of stay [LOS] and nonhome discharge), in-hospital costs, and in-hospital complications. Outcomes were compared between index versus contralateral surgeries and among contralateral surgeries of various intersurgical intervals. Contralateral surgeries had shorter LOS (2.2 ± 1.9 vs. 2.4 ± 2.0 days; p 0.05, each). Compared with the less than or equal to 3-month interval, the 4 to 6-month interval exhibited highest odds ratio (OR) of any infection (OR: 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.13–2.88]; p = 0.013), urinary tract infection (OR:1.81, 95%CI: [1.13–2.90]; p = 0.014), and any-cardiac complications (OR:1.17; 95%CI: [1.01–1.35]; p = 0.037). Patients in the 10–12-month cohort had lowest odds of posthemorrhagic anemia (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: [0.72–0.98]; p = 0.03). Overall, the second surgery of a staged BTKA has lower healthcare utilization despite similar complication rates. While patients in the 10 to 12-month intersurgical interval had the most favorable overall safety profile, no single interval exhibited consistently lower complications for all measured outcomes. Special care pathways should be optimized to care for patients undergoing staged BTKA.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the sole disease-modifying intervention for end-stage osteoarthritis. However, the temporal trends and stratification of age and patient demographics of pain and function levels at which surgeons perform TKA have not been characterized. The present investigation aimed to analyze the temporal trends of preoperative pain and functional patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) over the past 5 years when stratifying patient demographics. A prospective cohort of all patients who underwent primary elective TKA between January 2016 and December 2020 at a North American integrated tertiary health care system was retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was quarterly baseline (preoperative) pain and function PROM values before primary elective TKA. Evaluated PROMs included Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain and KOOS-physical function shortform (PS) for the 5-year study period and were stratified by patient demographics (age, sex, race, and body mass index [BMI]). A total of 10,327 patients were analyzed. Preoperative pain levels remained unchanged over the study period for patients in the 45- to 64-year category (P-trend = 0.922). Conversely, there was a significant improvement in preoperative pain levels in the 65+ years group. Sex-stratified trends between males and females did not demonstrate a significant change in pre-TKA baseline pain over the study period (P-trend = 0.347 and P-trend = 0.0744). Both white and black patients demonstrated consistent KOOS-pain levels throughout the study period (P-trend = 0.0855 and P-trend = 0.626). Only white patients demonstrated improving preoperative KOOS-PS (P-trend = 0.0001), while black and “other” patients demonstrated consistent lower preoperative functional levels throughout the study period (P-trend = 0.456 and P-trend = 0.871). All BMI categories demonstrated relatively consistent preoperative KOOS-pain and KOOS-PS except for overweight and obese patients who demonstrated progressive improvement in preoperative KOOS-PS over the study period. Patients and surgeons are electing to perform primary TKA at higher levels of preoperative function. Stratification by race showed black patients did not experience a similar trend of improving function and exhibited a consistently lower functional level versus white patients. This disparity is likely to be multifactorial but may indicate underlying barriers to TKA access.

The optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial and surgeons tend to approach the patella with one of three general mindsets: always resurface the patella, never resurface the patella, or selectively resurface the patella based on specific patient or patellar criteria. Studies comparing resurfacing and non-resurfacing of the patella during TKA have reported inconsistent and contradictory findings. When resurfacing the patella is chosen, there are a number of available patellar component designs, materials, and techniques for cutting and fixation. When patellar non-resurfacing is chosen, several alternatives are available, including patellar denervation, lateral retinacular release, and patelloplasty. Surgeons may choose to perform any of these alone, or together in some combination. Prospective randomized studies are needed to better understand which patellar management techniques contribute to superior postoperative outcomes. Until then, this remains a controversial topic, and options for patellar management will need to be weighed on an individual basis per patient.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:861-871. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200156

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) changes in: (1) pain, function and global health; and (2) predictors of PROMs in patients undergoing aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) using a multilevel model with patients nested within surgeon. Methods: A prospective cohort of 216 patients with baseline and 1-year PROMs who underwent aseptic rTHA between January 2016 and December 2017 were analysed. The most common indication for rTHA was aseptic loosening, instability, and implant failure. The PROMs included in this study were HOOS Pain and HOOS Physical Function Short-form (PS), Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (MCS). Multivariable linear regression models were constructed for predicting 1-year PROMs. Results: Mean 1-year PROMs improvement for aseptic revisions were 30.4 points for HOOS Pain and 22.1 points for HOOS PS. Predictors of better pain relief were patients with higher baseline pain scores. Predictors of better 1-year function were patients with higher baseline function and patients with a posterolateral hip surgical approach during revision. Although VR-12 PCS scores had an overall improvement, nearly 50% of patients saw no improvement or had worse physical component scores. Only 30.7% of patients reported improvements in VR-12 MCS. Conclusions: Overall, patients undergoing aseptic rTHA improved in pain and function PROMs at 1 year. Although global health assessment improved overall, nearly half of aseptic rTHA patients reported no change in physical/mental health status. The associations highlighted in this study can help guide the shared decision-making process by setting expectations before aseptic revision THA.

The present study aimed to determine the distribution of Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) mental component scores (MCS) of patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the thresholds of VR-12 MCS scores that predict higher healthcare utilizations and 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).A prospective cohort of 4,194 primary THA patients (January 2016 to December 2019) were included. Multivariable and cubic spline regression models were used to test for associations between preoperative VR-12 MCS and postoperative outcomes, including: 90-day hospital resource utilization (non-home discharge, prolonged length of stay [LOS](i.e.≥3 days), all-cause readmission), attainment of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) at 1-year postoperative and Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) in the Hip Disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)-pain and HOOS-physical short form (PS).Lower VR-12 MCS was associated with older age, obesity, Black race, women, and smokers (all p0.001). Preoperative VR-12 MCS20 was associated with more than twice the odds of non-home discharge (odds ratio [OR]:2.31) and prolonged LOS (OR:3.46). VR-12 MCS60 was associated with higher odds of achieving PASS (OR:2.00), and SCB in HOOS-JR (OR: 1.16). Starting VR-12 MCS ≤40, there were exponentially higher odds of worse outcomes.Low preoperative VR-12 MCS, specifically less than 40, may predict increased healthcare utilization. Furthermore, preoperative VR-12 MCS60 predicts greater satisfaction at 1-year and higher odds of achieving SCB in HOOS-JR. Quantifiable thresholds for VR-12 MCS may aid in shared-decision making and patient counseling in setting expectations or may guide specific care pathway interventions to address mental health during THA.

The purpose of this study was to compare (1) operative time, (2) in-hospital pain scores, (3) opioid medication use, (4) length of stay (LOS), (5) discharge disposition at 90-day postoperative, (6) range of motion (ROM), (7) number of physical therapy (PT) visits, (8) emergency department (ED) visits, (9) readmissions, (10) reoperations, (11) complications, and (12) 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in propensity matched patient cohorts who underwent robotic arm-assisted (RA) versus manual total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Using a prospectively collected institutional database, patients who underwent RA- and manual TKA were the nearest neighbor propensity score matched 3:1 (255 manual TKA:85 RA-TKA), accounting for various preoperative characteristics. Data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal–Wallis, Pearson's Chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests, when appropriate. Postoperative pain scores, opioid use, ED visits, readmissions, and 1-year PROMs were similar between the cohorts. Manual TKA patients achieved higher maximum flexion ROM (120.3 ± 9.9 versus 117.8 ± 10.2, p = 0.043) with no statistical differences in other ROM parameters. Manual TKA had shorter operative time (105 vs.113 minutes, p

The association between preoperative prescription drug use (narcotics, sedatives, and stimulants) and complications and/or greater healthcare utilization (length of stay, discharge disposition, readmission, emergency department visits, and reoperation) after total joint arthroplasty has been established but not well quantified. The NarxCare score (NCS) is a weighted scalar measure of overall prescription opioid, sedative, and stimulant use. Higher scores reflect riskier drug-use patterns, which are calculated based on (1) the number of prescribing providers, (2) the number of dispensing pharmacies, (3) milligram equivalence doses, (4) coprescribed potentiating drugs, and (5) overlapping prescription days. The aforementioned factors have not been incorporated into association measures between preoperative prescription drug use and adverse events after THA. In addition, the utility of the NCS as a scalar measure in predicting post-THA complications has not been explored.(1) Is the NarxCare score (NCS) associated with 90-day readmission, reoperation, emergency department visits, length of stay, and discharge disposition after primary THA; and are there NCS thresholds associated with a higher risk for those adverse outcomes if such an association exists? (2) Is there an association between the type of preoperative active drug prescription and the aforementioned outcomes?Of 3040 primary unilateral THAs performed between November 2018 and December 2019, 92% (2787) had complete baseline information and were subsequently included. The cohort with missing baseline information (NCS or demographic/racial determinants; 8%) had similar BMI distribution but slightly younger age and a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Outcomes in this retrospective study of a longitudinally maintained institutional database included 90-day readmissions (all-cause, procedure, and nonprocedure-related), reoperations, 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, prolonged length of stay (2 days), and discharge disposition (home or nonhome). The association between the NCS category and THA outcomes was analyzed through multivariable regression analyses and a confirmatory propensity score-matched comparison based on age, gender, race, BMI, smoking status, CCI, insurance status, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach, which removed significant differences at baseline. A similar regression model was constructed to evaluate the association between the type of preoperative active drug prescription (opioids, sedatives, and stimulants) and adverse outcomes after THA.After controlling for potentially confounding variables like age, gender, race, BMI, smoking status, CCI, insurance status, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach, an NCS of 300 to 399 was associated with a higher odds of 90-day all-cause readmission (odds ratio 2.0 [95% confidence interval 1.1 to 3.3]; p = 0.02), procedure-related readmission (OR 3.3 [95% CI 1.4 to 7.9]; p = 0.006), length of stay2 days (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.5 to 3.2]; p0.001), and nonhome discharge (OR 2.0 [95% CI 1.3 to 3.1]; p = 0.002). A score of 400 to 499 demonstrated a similar pattern, in addition to a higher odds of 90-day emergency department visits (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.2 to 3.9]; p = 0.01). After controlling for potentially confounding variables like age, gender, race, BMI, smoking status, CCI, insurance status, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach, we found no clinically important association between an active opioid prescription and 90-day all-cause readmission (OR 1.002 [95% CI 1.001 to 1.004]; p = 0.05), procedure-related readmission (OR 1.003 [95% CI 1.001 to 1.006]; p = 0.02), length of stay2 days (OR 1.003 [95% CI 1.002 to 1.005]; p0.001), or nonhome discharge (OR 1.002 [95% CI 1.001 to 1.003]; p = 0.019); the large size of the database allowed us to find statistical associations, but the effect sizes are so small that the finding is unlikely to be clinically meaningful. A similarly small association that is unlikely to be clinically important was found between active sedative use and 90-day ED visits (OR 1.002 [95% CI 1.001 to 1.004]; p = 0.02).Preoperative prescription drug use, as reflected by higher NCSs, has a dose-response association with adverse outcomes after THA. Surgeons may use the preoperative NCS to initiate and guide a patient-centered discussion regarding possible postoperative risks associated with prescription drug-use patterns (sedatives, opioids, or stimulants). An interdisciplinary approach can then be initiated to mitigate unfavorable patterns of prescription drug use and subsequently lower patient NCSs. However, given its nature and its reflection of drug-use patterns rather than patients' current health status, the NCS does not qualify as a basis for surgical denial or ineligibility.Level III, diagnostic study.

The purpose of this study is to assess how unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) patient demographics, comorbidities, and episode of care outcomes have changed from 2008 to 2018 in order to better understand the impact of recent changes in healthcare ideology on UKA. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify demographics, comorbidities, and episode of care outcomes in patients undergoing primary UKA from 2008 to 2013 (n = 3096) vs 2014–2018 (n = 9073). Trends were analyzed using Student’s t-tests for continuous variables and Chi-squared tests and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. When comparing the years 2008–2013 to 2014–2018, there was no clinically significant difference in age, body mass index (BMI), proportion of patients with a BMI > 40 kg/m2, percentage of diabetes (15.0% vs 15.5; p = 0.715), smoking status (10.2% vs 9.4%; 0.177), COPD (3.0% vs 2.8%; p = 0.645), CHF within 30 days (

Approximately 80% of hip and knee surgeons will face malpractice litigation. Understanding contemporary reasons for litigation and legal outcomes in our field may help surgeons deliver more effective and satisfying care, while limiting their legal exposure. This study aimed to determine: 1) which orthopaedic subspecialties were most frequently litigated; 2) malpractice damages and negligence claimed; 3) the proportion of different case outcomes; and 4) factors associated with defense verdicts.A nationwide database was queried for all orthopaedic medical malpractice claims (2015 to 2020), obtaining 164 claims from 17 states. Variables included: case outcome, indemnity payment, damages, negligence claimed, treatment, and patient characteristics. A binary logistic regression determined if any collected variable increased the likelihood of a defense verdict.Hip and knee cases were the highest-represented (n=49, 29.9%; Knee: n=26, 15.9%; Hip: n=23, 14.0%), followed by Spine (n=36; 22.0%), Trauma (n=29;17.7%), Hand and Wrist (n=16; 9.8%), Sports (n=16; 9.1%), Foot and Ankle (n=7; 4.3%), Pediatric (n=6; 3.7%), and Shoulder (n=6; 3.7%). Within Hip and Knee Surgery, Defense Verdicts occurred in 38 cases (77.6%), while 9 (18.4%) resulted in Plaintiff Verdicts (Mean Payment: $4,866,929) and 2 (4.1%) resulted in Settlements (Mean Settlement: $1,550,000). Non-reversible damages (e.g., paralysis, amputation, death; p0.001) were associated with a decreased likelihood of a defense outcome.Hip and knee cases were the highest represented in orthopaedic malpractice litigation. Surgeons were more frequently found negligent when non-reversible damages occurred. Orthopaedic surgeons should be cognizant of litigation patterns while ensuring patient-centered high-quality care.

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are uncommon and infrequently the focus of studies.Acetabular fractures are occasionally recognized postoperatively when patients report unremitting groin pain weeks after surgery.The widespread use of cementless acetabular cups might lead to a higher number of fractures than are clinically detectable.Appropriate recognition, including mindfulness of preoperative patient and surgical risk factors, is critical to the successful management of acetabular complications.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing in the elderly population; however, some patients, family members, and surgeons raise age-related concerns over expected improvement and risks. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the relationship between age and change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); (2) model how many patients would be denied improvements in PROMs if hypothetical age cutoffs were implemented; and (3) assess length of stay (LOS), readmission, reoperation, and mortality per age group. A prospective cohort of 4,396 primary TKAs (August 2015–August 2018) was analyzed. One-year PROMs were evaluated via Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain, -physical function short form (-PS), and -quality of life (-QOL), as well as Veterans Rand-12 (VR-12) physical (-PCS) and mental component (-MCS) scores. Positive predictive values (PPVs) of the number of postoperative “failures” (i.e., unattained minimal clinically important difference in PROMs) relative to number of hypothetically denied “successes” from a theoretical age-group restriction was estimated. KOOS-PS and QOL median score improvements were equivalent among all age groups (p = 0.946 and p = 0.467, respectively). KOOS-pain improvement was equivalent for ≥80 and 60–69-year groups (44.4 [27.8–55.6]). Median VR-12 PCS improvements diminished as age increased (15.9, 14.8, and 13.4 for the 60–69, 70–79, and ≥80 groups, respectively; p = 0.002) while improvement in VR-12 MCS was similar among age groups (p = 0.440). PPV for failure was highest in the ≥80 group, yet remained 2, non-home discharge, and 90-day readmission were highest in the ≥80 group (8.11% [n = 24], p

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the (1) indications, (2) preoperative precautions, and (3) stepwise technical details of modern femoral stem cemented fixation. RECENT FINDINGS: Femoral stem cementation provides excellent implant longevity with a low periprosthetic fracture rate among patients with compromised bone quality or aberrant anatomy. Unfamiliarity with the details of modern cementation techniques among trainees who may lack frequent exposure to cementing femoral stems may preclude them from offering this viable option to suitable patients in later stages of their careers. As such, maximizing benefit from cemented femoral stem fixation among suitable candidates is contingent upon the meticulous use of modern cementation techniques. SUMMARY: In addition to proper patient selection, modern cementation techniques emphasize the use of (1) pulsatile lavage of the femoral canal, (2) utilization of epinephrine-soaked swabs, (3) vacuum cement mixing, (4) retrograde cement introduction, (5) cement pressurization, and (6) the use of stem centralizers. Furthermore, identifying and optimizing the preoperative status of at-risk patients with pre-existing cardiopulmonary compromise, in addition to intraoperative vigilance, are essential for mitigating the risk of developing bone cement implantation syndrome. Further research is required to assess the utility of cemented femoral stem fixation among younger patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12178-020-09681-5.

BACKGROUND Bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to increase both mortality and complications, but has potential benefits including decreased length of stay, rehabilitation time, and costs. The purpose of this study was to use data from a nationally representative database to identify if there is a population of patients undergoing TKA in whom bilateral TKA can be safely performed, by comparing 30-day mortality and complication rates with those of patients undergoing unilateral TKA. METHODS The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was queried to compare 30-day rates of mortality and any complication between bilateral TKA and unilateral TKA. A total of 8,291 patients who underwent bilateral TKA were matched 1:1 with a unilateral TKA control cohort (n = 315,219) by morbidity probability, which is a cumulative variable encompassing demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and laboratory values. Patients were divided into quartiles based on morbidity probability. Binary logistic regression comparing bilateral TKA and unilateral TKA for the same quartiles was performed to establish if any population could safely have bilateral TKA performed. RESULTS Bilateral TKA had an increased risk for all complications (p < 0.001) and major complications (p < 0.001) when compared with unilateral TKA regardless of health status. For all complications, there was a greater than threefold increase for the first quartile (healthiest patients) (p < 0.001), a greater than fourfold increase for the second and third quartiles (p < 0.001), and a greater than threefold increase for the fourth quartile (least healthy patients) (p < 0.001). For major complications, there was a greater than twofold increase for the first quartile (p = 0.001) and the second quartile (p < 0.001), an almost threefold increase for the third quartile (p < 0.001), and a 57% increase for the fourth quartile (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS This study will assist shared decision-making between orthopaedic surgeons and patients by suggesting that bilateral TKA may not be as safe an option for even healthy individuals compared with unilateral TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Aims Thresholds for operative eligibility based on body mass index (BMI) alone may restrict patient access to the benefits of arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between BMI and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to determine how many patients would have been denied improvements in PROMs if BMI cut-offs were to be implemented. Methods A prospective cohort of 3,449 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. The following one-year PROMs were evaluated: hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) pain, HOOS Physical Function Shortform (PS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity, Veterans Rand-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS). Positive predictive values for failure to improve and the number of patients denied surgery in order to avoid a failed improvement were calculated for each PROM at different BMI cut-offs. Results There was a trend to improved outcomes in terms of pain and function improvements with higher BMI. Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 had median (Q1, Q3) HOOS pain improvements of 58 points (interquartile range (IQR) 41 to 70) and those with BMI 35 to 40 kg/m2 had median improvements of 55 (IQR 40 to 68). With a BMI cut-off of 30 kg/m2, 21 patients would have been denied a meaningful improvement in HOOS pain score in order to avoid one failed improvement. At a 35 kg/m2 cut-off, 18 patients would be denied improvement, at a 40 kg/m2 cut-off 21 patients would be denied improvement, and at a 45 kg/m2 cut-off 21 patients would be denied improvement. Similar findings were observed for HOOS-PS, UCLA, and VR-12 scores. Conclusion Patients with higher BMIs show greater improvements in PROMs. Using BMI alone to determine eligibility criteria did not improve the rate of clinically meaningful improvements. BMI thresholds prevent patients who may benefit the most from surgery from undergoing THA. Surgeons should consider PROMs improvements in determining eligibility for THA while balancing traditional metrics of preoperative risk stratification. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):683–692.

Early findings of superior total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes at high volume centers have been thought to have led to distinct referral patterns. However, the effect of these selective referral processes has not been well assessed. Therefore, this study compared the characteristics of primary TKA patients at high, intermediate, and low volume hospitals.A total of 12,541 primary TKA patients were stratified into risk groups based on age (65 years), body mass index (40), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (≥4). Hospitals were classified as low, intermediate, or high volume based on mean annual TKA volumes (250, 250-499, and500). Multivariate logistic regression models evaluated the relationship between baseline patient characteristics and hospital volume.There was a greater percentage of high risk patients at high volume (19%, n = 853) compared to those at intermediate (16%, n = 899) or low volume (17%, n = 444) hospitals (P.001). Patients with a body mass index40 were more likely to be treated at high compared to intermediate (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-1.6, P.001) and low volume centers (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7, P.001). Patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index scores ≥4 were also more likely be treated at high compared to intermediate (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.6, P.001) or low (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.4, P = .002) volume centers.This study found that TKA patients at high volume centers have significantly different baseline characteristics compared to those at lower volume centers. This study highlights the importance of considering hospital volume status and the associated disparity in the preoperative risk of patients when comparing primary TKA outcomes between centers.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been proven to be a safe and efficacious operation; however, there is a paucity of literature on outcomes in patients in the 99th percentile for height. The objectives of this study were to identify differences in (1) implant selection, (2) operative times, (3) intraoperative and postoperative complications, (4) 90-day readmission, (5) all cause reoperation rates, and (6) hospital length of stay (LOS), in tall-statured patients compared with a matched control cohort. An electronic research request was used to identify 12,850 patients who underwent THA from January 2012 to December 2016 with minimum 1-year follow-up at a single health care system for retrospective chart review. Patients were identified in the 99th percentile for height (193 cm for males and 177 cm for females) and then matched to controls based on gender, race, age, body mass index, and Charlson comorbidity index. A total of 260 THA patients (2%) were identified in the 99th percentile for height. The tall-statured patients were then matched to 248 patients of normal stature. The exclusion criteria was met by 172 tall-statured patients and 165 normal-statured patients. Final analysis comprised of 86 tall-statured patients (100 THA) and 83 matched normal-statured patients (92 THA). Baseline demographics information and the outcomes of interest were then compared. The mean height of the female patients in the tall cohort was 181.01 ± 2.51 cm compared with 166.6 ± 6.98 cm for the control group (p

Background Establishing an association between postoperative outcomes and the spectrum of renal function would allow for more informed decisions to manage surgical risks and improved patient-specific care. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) can be calculated from standard prescreening measurements to gauge renal function. This work investigates the effect of eGFR, as a continuous and categorical variable, on mortality and major and minor complications in patients undergoing revision total knee and hip arthroplasty. Methods 25,056 patients having undergone revision total hip and knee arthroplasty from 2013 to 2016 were identified using the National Quality Improvement Program database. The investigated outcomes included 30-day mortality, major complications, and minor complications. Multivariate regression models were created to evaluate the effect of eGFR on the outcomes of interest. Multivariate spline regressions were generated to assess for nonlinear relationships between eGFR as a continuous variable and the outcomes. Results Our study revealed that as eGFR decreased Conclusion Patients with lower preoperative eGFR generally display an increased risk for complications after revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. Proper consideration should be given to this patient population before surgical intervention to allow for preventative measures to be taken to improve patient outcomes.

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations of hospital volume with revision surgery for infection and superficial incisional infections. Methods A review of 12,541 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) at a large integrated health system from 2014 to 2017 was conducted. Sixteen hospitals were classified as low-volume, medium-volume, or high-volume hospitals according to the mean number of TKAs/year ( 500, respectively). Thresholds were guided by percentiles and the literature on volume-outcome relationships. Medical records were reviewed for revision surgery for infection and superficial incisional infections during a mean 2-year review period. Multivariate analyses, adjusted for clinical and patient characteristics, were performed to evaluate the association between hospital volume and infection. Results The overall rate of revision surgery for infection was 0.7% (n = 82), and the overall rate of superficial incisional infection was 2.6% (n = 324). After accounting for potential confounders, hospital volume was not found to have a significant association with revision surgery for infection when comparing high-volume and low-volume hospitals (odds ratio, 1.615; 95% confidence interval, 0.761-3.427; P = .212) as well as when comparing high-volume and medium-volume hospitals (odds ratio, 1.464; 95% confidence interval, 0.853-2.512; P = .166). Moreover, the risk of superficial incisional infection at high-volume hospitals was similar to that at low-volume (P = .107) and medium-volume (P = .491) hospitals. Conclusion Infection outcomes are quality metrics that are frequently used to compare hospitals including those of varying volumes. Using contemporary thresholds, this study found that infection rates after TKA at high-volume hospitals are comparable to low-volume and medium-volume hospitals.

Introduction: The broad aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of using barbed sutures and running closure versus interrupted placement of standard of care sutures for closure of the arthrotomy during total hip arthroplasty (THA). Specifically, we compared duration of arthrotomy closure, the number of sutures utilised for arthrotomy closure, and 90-day outcomes including wound-related readmission, reoperation, and complications. Methods: A total of 60 patients undergoing 60 THAs were enrolled in a prospective, single-blinded trial and randomised to receive either running closure of the arthrotomy with barbed sutures ( n = 30) or interrupted closure with standard of care sutures ( n = 30). Patients were eligible if they were undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis and excluded if they had a BMI > 45 kg/m2 or age > 80 years or Results: Arthrotomy closure duration was significantly shorter in the barbed suture group (3 minutes ± 9 seconds) versus the standard of care group (8 minutes ± 26 seconds, p < 0.001). The suture utilisation for arthrotomy closure was 1 suture in the barbed sutured group 28/30 (93%) patients versus 2–4 sutures in 27/30 (90%) in the standard of care group ( p < 0.001). The overall number of wound-related complications in the barbed suture group was 1/30 (3%) versus 1/30 (3%) in the standard of care group ( p = 1.00). The rate of suture abscesses was 1/30 (3%) in barbed suture group versus the standard of care ( p = 1.00). There was trochanter bursitis 1/30 (3%) in the standard of care group versus zero in the barbed suture group ( p = 1.00). Conclusions: These results suggest that barbed suture utilisation may be faster and more resource efficient than use of standard of care sutures for arthrotomy closure in THA. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03285555

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a relatively common comorbidity that has been shown to adversely affect outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA), as well as to increase the procedure's total costs. However, the effect of different stages of kidney disease and the association of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with perioperative THA complications are less understood. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate the relationships between eGFR, both as a categorical and continuous variable and 30-day outcomes and complications. Methods The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify 101,925 primary THAs between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016. The following outcomes were assessed: 30-day mortality, 30-day major complications, 30-day minor complications, specific complications, and discharge disposition. To evaluate the effect of eGFR status on outcomes and complication, multivariate regression models were created to adjust for differences in patient demographics and comorbidities. In addition, multivariate spline regressions were developed to assess the nonlinear relationships between eGFR as a continuous variable and the outcomes of interest. Results Our study revealed that as eGFR decreases to Conclusion Patients with lower eGFR, and in particular those with

Background: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging procedure that burdens the healthcare system. Despite being associated with worse outcomes relative to its primary counterpart, postoperative mortality after revision THA remains ill-defined. The present study aimed to (1) establish the overall 30-day mortality rate after revision THA and (2) explore the mortality rate stratified by age, comorbidity burden, and aseptic versus septic failure. Methods: The American College of Surgeons – National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent revision THA from 2011 to 2019. A total of 23,501 patients were identified and grouped into mortality ( n = 161) and mortality-free ( n = 23,340) cohorts. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and aseptic/septic failure were evaluated. Results: The overall 30-day mortality was 0.69%. The mortality rate by age group (normalised per 1000 patients) was 0 (18–39 years [Y]), 0.67 (40–49 Y), 1.10 (50–59 Y), 2.58 (60–69 Y), 6.15 (70–79 Y) 19.32 (80–89 Y), and 58.22 (90+Y) ( p 2 ( p Conclusions: 1 in 145 patients will suffer mortality during the 30 days after revision THA. PJI-related revision THA was associated with 1.5-fold increase in 30-day mortality rate compared to its aseptic counterpart. Certain patient determinants and baseline comorbidities, as measured by ASA and CCI scores, were associated with higher 30-day mortality rates. Therefore, it is imperative to identify such risk factors and implement perioperative patient optimisation pathways to mitigate the risk among vulnerable patients.

Decreased cost associated with same day discharge (SDD) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to an increased interest in this topic.The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is a population of TKA patients in which SDD has similar rates of 30-day complications compared to patients discharged on postoperative day 1 or 2.Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2018, 6,327 TKA patients who had a SDD (length of stay [LOS]=0) were matched to TKA patients who had a LOS of 1 or 2 days. All SDD patients were successfully matched 1:1 using the morbidity probability variable (a composite variable of demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory values). Patients were divided into quartiles based on their morbidity probability. Bivariate logistic regressions were then used to compare any complication and major complication rates in the SDD quartiles to the corresponding quartiles with a LOS of 1 or 2 days.When comparing the 1The unhealthiest 50% of patients in this study who underwent SDD TKA were at an increased risk of having any complication, calling into question the current state of patient selection for SDD TKA.

As the number of primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures continues to rise, megaprostheses have found an emerging role in more complex revision arthroplasty cases that require additional reconstruction, stability, and restoration of function.Megaprosthesis options have evolved: in addition to cemented prostheses, cementless and even hybrid fixation designs optimize longevity. Proximal femoral replacement (PFR), distal femoral replacement (DFR), proximal tibial replacement (PTR), and total femoral replacement (TFR) are all limb salvage options in the setting of substantial bone loss, poor bone quality, and soft-tissue compromise.Dislocation is one of the most common complications after PFR, likely due to the loss of soft-tissue integrity, most notably the hip abductor musculature from the greater trochanter. The utilization of dual-mobility constructs, larger femoral heads, elevated acetabular liners, and constrained acetabular liners may reduce the risk of instability and improve overall hip function.Patients with megaprostheses may be more prone to periprosthetic joint infection and surgical site infection given multiple variables, such as the lengthy nature of the surgical procedure, prolonged wound exposure, extensive soft-tissue dissection and resection, poor soft-tissue coverage, and poorer host status.Despite advances in technology, complication and revision rates remain high after megaprosthesis reconstruction. Therefore, thorough attention to patient-specific factors must be considered for appropriate use of these constructs.

Demographic factors have been implicated in THA and TKA outcome disparities. Specifically, patients' racial backgrounds have been reported to influence outcomes after surgery, including length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient readmissions. However, in the United States, health-impacting socioeconomic disadvantage is sometimes associated with racial differences in ways that can result in important confounding, thereby raising the question of whether race-associated post-THA/TKA adverse outcomes are an independent function of race or a byproduct of confounding from socioeconomic deprivation, which is potentially addressable. To explore this, we used the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) as a proxy for socioeconomic disadvantage, since it is a socioeconomic parameter that estimates the likely deprivation associated with a patient's home address.The goal of this study was to investigate (1) whether race (in this study, Black versus White) was independently associated with adverse outcomes, including prolonged length of stay (LOS3 days), nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission, and emergency department (ED) visits while controlling for age, gender, BMI, smoking, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and insurance; and (2) whether socioeconomic disadvantage, measured by ADI, substantially mediated any association between race and any of the aforementioned measured outcomes.Between November 2018 and December 2019, 2638 underwent elective primary THA and 4915 patients underwent elective primary TKA for osteoarthritis at one of seven hospitals within a single academic center. Overall, 12% (742 of 5948) of patients were Black and 88% (5206 of 5948) were White. We included patients with complete demographic data, ADI data, and who were of Black or White race; with these criteria, 11% (293 of 2638) were excluded in the THA group, and 27% (1312 of 4915) of patients were excluded in the TKA group. In this retrospective, comparative study, patient follow-up was obtained using a longitudinally maintained database, leaving 89% (2345 of 2638) and 73% (3603 of 4915) for analysis in the THA and TKA groups, respectively. For both THA and TKA, Black patients had higher ADI scores, slightly higher BMIs, and were more likely to be current smokers at baseline. Furthermore, within the TKA cohort there was a higher proportion of Black women compared with White women. Multivariable regression analysis was utilized to assess associations between race and LOS of 3 or more days, nonhome discharge disposition, 90-day inpatient readmission, and 90-day ED admission, while adjusting for age, gender, BMI, smoking, CCI, and insurance. This was followed by a mediation analysis that explored whether the association between race (the independent variable) and measured outcomes (the dependent variables) could be partially or completely attributable to confounding from the ADI (the mediator, in this model). The mediation effect was measured as a percentage of the total effect of race on the outcomes of interest that was mediated by ADI.In the THA group, after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, smoking, CCI, and insurance, White patients had lower odds of experiencing an LOS of 3 days or more (OR 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 0.59]; p0.001) and nonhome discharge (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.56]; p0.001). In mediation analysis, ADI partially explained (or mediated) 37% of the association between race and LOS of 3 days or more (-0.043 [95% CI -0.063 to -0.026]; p0.001) and 40% of the association between race and nonhome discharge (0.041 [95% CI 0.024 to 0.059]; p0.001). However, a smaller direct association between race and both outcomes was observed (LOS 3 days or more: -0.075 [95% CI -0.13 to -0.024]; p = 0.004; nonhome discharge: 0.060 [95% CI 0.016 to 0.11]; p = 0.004). No association was observed between race and 90-day readmission or ED admission in the THA group. In the TKA group, after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, smoking, CCI, and insurance, White patients had lower odds of experiencing an LOS of 3 days or more (OR 0.41 [95% CI 0.32 to 0.54]; p0.001), nonhome discharge (OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.33 to 0.60]; p0.001), 90-day readmission (OR 0.54 [95% CI 0.39 to 0.77]; p0.001), and 90-day ED admission (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.45 to 0.79]; p0.001). In mediation analysis, ADI mediated 19% of the association between race and LOS of 3 days or more (-0.021 [95% CI -0.035 to -0.007]; p = 0.004) and 38% of the association between race and nonhome discharge (0.029 [95% CI -0.016 to 0.040]; p0.001), but there was also a direct association between race and these outcomes (LOS 3 days or more: -0.088 [95% CI -0.13 to -0.049]; p0.001; nonhome discharge: 0.046 [95% CI 0.014 to 0.078]; p = 0.006). ADI did not mediate the associations observed between race and 90-day readmission and ED admission in the TKA group.Our findings suggest that socioeconomic disadvantage may be implicated in a substantial proportion of the previously assumed race-driven disparity in healthcare utilization parameters after primary total joint arthroplasty. Orthopaedic surgeons should attempt to identify potentially modifiable socioeconomic disadvantage indicators. This serves as a call to action for the orthopaedic community to consider specific interventions to support patients from vulnerable areas or whose incomes are lower, such as supporting applications for nonemergent medical transportation or referring patients to local care coordination agencies. Future studies should seek to identify which specific resources or approaches improve outcomes after TJA in patients with socioeconomic disadvantage.Level III, therapeutic study.

Patient satisfaction is indicative of the quality of care in the value-driven healthcare model. The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) is a dichotomous outcome tool measuring the highest level of symptom beyond which a patient considers him/herself well. The purpose of the present study was to identify combined preoperative phenotypes of PROMs associated with not achieving PASS at 1 year following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to associate such phenotypes with hospital utilization parameters.A prospective institutional cohort of 4,034 patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis (OA) with 1-year follow-up was included. Preoperative scores on Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)-pain, HOOS physical short form-(PS), and Veteran's Rand-12 (VR-12) mental component summary-(MCS) were used to develop phenotypes. Associations between preoperative 'phenotype' and 1-year PASS, discharge disposition, prolonged length of stay, 90-day readmission, and 1-year reoperation were evaluated using multivariate regression.10.6% (427/4,043) reported their state as 'not satisfactory' at 1 year. The phenotypes were the only preoperative factors to demonstrate the increased likelihood of 1-year dissatisfaction. Only phenotypes with lower than average preoperative MCS demonstrated this association. Low scores in all presently measured PROMs (Pain-PS-MCS-) was associated with double the odds of 1-year dissatisfaction (P.001), 2.43 times the odds of nonhome discharge and 2.2 times the odds of prolonged LOS.Patients with lower preoperative scores across multiple PROMs have increased odds of dissatisfaction after THA; and assessing pain, function, and MCS concomitantly (as phenotypes) may support identifying patients at risk for not achieving a satisfactory outcome.

Background: Mortality after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a rare but devastating complication. This meta-analysis aimed to: (1) determine the mortality rates at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years after THA; (2) identify risk factors and causes of mortality after THA. Methods: Pubmed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, EBSCO Host, and Google Scholar databases were queried for studies reporting mortality rates after primary elective, unilateral THA. Inverse-proportion models were constructed to quantify the incidence of all-cause mortality at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years after THA. Random-effects multiple regression was performed to investigate the potential effect modifiers of age (at time of THA), body mass index, and gender. Results: A total of 53 studies (3,297,363 patients) were included. The overall mortality rate was 3.9%. The 30-day mortality was 0.49% (95% CI; 0.23–0.84). Mortality at 90 days was 0.47% (95% CI, 0.38–0.57). Mortality increased exponentially between 90 days and 5 years, with a 1-year mortality rate of 1.90% (95% CI, 1.22–2.73) and a 5-year mortality rate of 9.85% (95% CI, 5.53–15.22). At 10-year follow-up, the mortality rate was 16.43% (95% CI, 1.17–22.48). Increasing comorbidity indices, socioeconomic disadvantage, age, anaemia, and smoking were found to be risk factors for mortality. The most commonly reported causes of death were ischaemic heart disease, malignancy, and pulmonary disease. Conclusions: All-cause mortality remains low after contemporary THA. However, 1 out of 10 patients and 1 out of 6 patients were deceased after 5 years and 10 years of THA, respectively. As expected, age, but not BMI or gender, was significantly associated with mortality.

Evaluating trends and drivers of baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is critical to understanding when patients and providers elect to undergo surgery. We aimed to assess the following: (1) 5-year trends in baseline PROMs pre-THA (total hip arthroplasty) stratified by patient determinants; (2) patient factor associated with poor preoperative hip pain/function; (3) phenotypes of combined pain/function PROMs at baseline; and (4) intersurgeon variability in PROM thresholds at surgery.A prospective cohort of 6,902 primary THAs was enrolled (January 2016 to December 2020). Patient/surgeon details and PROMs were collected at point of care preoperatively. Outcomes included trends (5 years; 20 quarters) in Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)-Pain and HOOS-PS (Physical Function Short-Form), stratified by patient demographics. Patients were further classified into phenotype categories of above or equal to median pain/function (P+PS+); below median pain/function (P-PS-); above or equal to median pain but below median function (P+PS-); and below median pain but above or equal to median function (P-PS+).Baseline HOOS-Pain was consistent across the study period (P-trend = .166), while HOOS-PS demonstrated increasing function (P-trend = .015). Such trends were appreciable in males, females, and White (P-trend.001, each) but not Black patients (P-trend = .67). Higher odds ratio (OR) of low baseline HOOS-Pain and HOOS-PS were detected among females (HOOS-Pain: OR 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-1.98, P.001; HOOS-PS: OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.38-1.77, P.001), Black patients (HOOS-Pain: OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.35-2.82, P.001; HOOS-PS: OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.34-1.89, P.001), and smokers (HOOS-Pain: OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.29-1.89, P.001; HOOS-PS: OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.25-1.85, P.001). The P-PS- cohort (32.4%) had lowest age (65.2 ± 11.1 years), highest body mass index (31.6 ± 6.9 kg/mIn contrast to the general population, Black patients have consistently received THA at lower functional levels throughout the 5-year period. Females, smokers, and Black patients were more likely to have poorer pain and function at THA. PROMs assessment as combined pain-function phenotypes may provide a more comprehensive interpretation of patient status preoperatively.

To investigate (1) healthcare utilization, (2) in-hospital metrics and (3) total in-hospital costs associated with simultaneous versus staged BTKA while evaluating staged BTKA as a single process consisting of two combined episodes.The national readmissions database was reviewed for simultaneous and staged (two primary unilateral TKAs12 months apart) BTKA patients (2016-2017). A total of 19,382 simultaneous BTKAs were identified, and propensity score matched (1:1) to staged BTKA patients (19,382 patients; 38,764 surgeries) based on demographics, comorbidities, and socioeconomic determinants. Outcomes included healthcare utilization [length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition], in-hospital periprosthetic fractures, non-mechanical complications, and costs. Staged BTKA was evaluated as one process consisting of two episodes. For each staged patient, continuous outcomes were evaluated via the sum of both episodes. Categorical outcomes were added, and percents were expressed relative to total number of surgeries (n = 38,764).Simultaneous BTKA had longer LOS (5.0 days ± 4.7 vs. 4.5 days ± 3.5; p 0.001), higher non-home discharge [36.9% (n = 7150/19,382) vs. 13.6% (n = 5451/38,764)], in-hospital periprosthetic fractures [0.13% (26/19,382) vs. 0.08% (31/38,764); p = 0.049], any non-mechanical complication [33.76% (6543/19,382) vs.15.93% (6177/38,764); p 0.0001], hematoma/seroma formation [0.11% (22/19,382) vs. 0.05% (20/38,764); p = 0.0088], wound disruption [0.08% (16/19,382) vs. 0.04% (16/38,764); p = 0.0454], and any infection [1.13% (219/19,382) vs. 0.50% (194/38,764); p 0.0001]. Average in-hospital costs for the two staged BTKA episodes combined were $5006 higher than those of simultaneous BTKA ($28,196 ± $18,488 vs. $33,202 ± $15,240; p 0.001).Simultaneous BTKA had higher healthcare utilization and in-hospital complications than both episodes of staged BTKA combined, with a minimal in-hospital cost savings. Future studies are warranted to further explore patient selection who would benefit from BTKA.

Cementless fixation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has gained traction with the advent of newer fixation technologies. This study assessed (1) healthcare utilization (length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission, and 1-year reoperation); (2) 1-year mortality; and (3) 1-year joint-specific and global health-related patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among patients who received cementless versus cemented TKA. Patients who underwent cementless and cemented TKA at a single institution (July 2015–August 2018) were prospectively enrolled. A total of 424 cementless and 5,274 cemented TKAs were included. The cementless cohort was propensity score-matched to a group cemented TKAs (1:3-cementless: n = 424; cemented: n = 1,272). Within the matched cohorts, 76.9% (n = 326) cementless and 75.9% (n = 966) cementless TKAs completed 1-year PROMs. Healthcare utilization measures, mortality and the median 1-year change in knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-pain, KOOS-physical function short form (PS), KOOS-knee related quality of life (KRQOL), Veteran Rand (VR)-12 mental composite (MCS), and physical composite (PCS) scores were compared. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMs was calculated. Cementless TKA exhibited similar rates of median LOS (p = 0.109), nonhome discharge disposition (p = 0.056), all-cause 90-day readmission (p = 0.226), 1-year reoperation (p = 0.597), and 1-year mortality (p = 0.861) when compared with cemented TKA. There was no significant difference in the median 1-year improvement in KOOS-pain (p = 0.370), KOOS-PS (p = 0.417), KOOS-KRQOL (p = 0.101), VR-12-PCS (p = 0.269), and VR-12-MCS (p = 0.191) between the cementless and cemented TKA cohorts. Rates of attaining MCID were similar in both cohorts for assessed PROMs (p > 0.05, each) except KOOS-KRQOL (cementless: n = 313 (96.0%) vs. cemented: n = 895 [92.7%]; p = 0.036). Cementless TKA provides similar healthcare-utilization, mortality, and 1-year PROM improvement versus cemented TKA. Cementless fixation in TKA may provide value through higher MCID improvement in quality of life. Future episode-of-care cost-analyses and longer-term survivorship investigations are warranted.

Aims The current study aimed to compare robotic arm-assisted (RA-THA), computer-assisted (CA-THA), and manual (M-THA) total hip arthroplasty regarding in-hospital metrics including length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, in-hospital complications, and cost of RA-THA versus M-THA and CA-THA versus M-THA, as well as trends in use and uptake over a ten-year period, and future projections of uptake and use of RA-THA and CA-THA. Methods The National Inpatient Sample was queried for primary THAs (2008 to 2017) which were categorized into RA-THA, CA-THA, and M-THA. Past and projected use, demographic characteristics distribution, income, type of insurance, location, and healthcare setting were compared among the three cohorts. In-hospital complications, LOS, discharge disposition, and in-hospital costs were compared between propensity score-matched cohorts of M-THA versus RA-THA and M-THA versus CA-THA to adjust for baseline characteristics and comorbidities. Results RA-THA and CA-THA did not exhibit any clinically meaningful reduction in mean LOS (RA-THA 2.2 days (SD 1.4) vs 2.3 days (SD 1.8); p < 0.001, and CA-THA 2.5 days (SD 1.9) vs 2.7 days (SD 2.3); p < 0.001, respectively) compared to their respective propensity score-matched M-THA cohorts. RA-THA, but not CA-THA, had similar non-home discharge rates to M-THA (RA-THA 17.4% vs 18.5%; p = 0.205, and 18.7% vs 24.9%; p < 0.001, respectively). Implant-related mechanical complications were lower in RA-THA (RA-THA 0.5% vs M-THA 3.1%; p < 0.001, and CA-THA 1.2% vs M-THA 2.2%; p < 0.001), which was associated with a significantly lower in-hospital dislocation (RA-THA 0.1% vs M-THA 0.8%; p < 0.001). Both RA-THA and CA-THA demonstrated higher mean higher index in-hospital costs (RA-THA $18,416 (SD $8,048) vs M-THA $17,266 (SD $8,396); p < 0.001, and CA-THA $20,295 (SD $8,975) vs M-THA $18,624 (SD $9,226); p < 0.001, respectively). Projections indicate that 23.9% and 3.2% of all THAs conducted in 2025 will be robotic arm- and computer-assisted, respectively. Projections indicated that RA-THA use may overtake M-THA by 2028 (48.3%) and reach 65.8% of all THAs by 2030. Conclusion Technology-assisted THA, particularly RA-THA, may provide value by lowering in-hospital early dislocation rates and and other in-hospital metrics compared to M-THA. Higher index-procedure and hospital costs warrant further comprehensive cost analyses to determine the true added value of RA-THA in the episode of care, particularly since we project that one in four THAs in 2025 and two in three THA by 2030 will use RA-THA technology. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(9):1488–1496.

Background The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has recently added primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) codes to the 2019 Potentially Misvalued Codes List. The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons and the American Medical Association have called for contemporary data that would assess operative time to inform the decision on reimbursement valuation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to report total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) operative times within a large multihospital and physician organizational enterprise to assess stability over time. Methods The study was a retrospective review (2015-2019) of a prospectively maintained multihospital health system database. A total of 12,567 consecutive TJAs were included (5742 THAs by 16 surgeons; 6825 TKAs by 20 surgeons). Operative time was between incision and completion of wound closure. Descriptive statistics were performed for categorical/continuous variables, and trend analysis was performed to assess if there was a change in time over the study period. Results For THA, 43.1% were male, with a mean age of 64.1 ± 11.8 years and a mean BMI of 30.1 ± 6.6. The mean operative time was 96.4 ± 36.8 minutes. For TKA, 39.4% were male, with a mean age of 66.2 ± 9.4 years and a mean BMI of 32.7 ± 6.8. The mean operative time was 103.6 ± 29.9 minutes. Trend analysis demonstrated no significant difference in operative time across the study period. Conclusion Our analysis demonstrated that operative time has remained stable, with mean time for THA and TKA consistently within 3.6 minutes of the historical benchmark of 100 minutes. Given these findings in a large institutional cohort, there is no definitive evidence to support changing current procedural valuation for TJA based on operative time.

Often, differences in length of stay after total knee arthroplasty are solely attributed to patient factors. Therefore, our aim was to determine the influence of patient-related and procedure or structural-related risk factors as predictors of length of stay after total knee arthroplasty.A prospective cohort of 4,509 patients (54.6% of whom had Medicare for insurance) underwent primary total knee arthroplasty across 4 facilities in a single health-care system (from January 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017). Risk factors were categorized as patient-related risk factors (demographic characteristics, smoking status, Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Mental Component Summary score [VR-12 MCS], Charlson Comorbidity Index, surgical indication, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], deformity, range of motion, and discharge location probability assessed by a nomogram predicting location after arthroplasty) or as procedure or structural-related risk factors (hospital site, surgeon, day of the week when the surgical procedure was performed, implant type, and surgical procedure start time). Multivariable cumulative link (proportional odds logistic regression) models were built to identify significant predictors from candidate risk factors for 1-day, 2-day, and ≥3-day length of stay. Performance was compared between a model containing patient-related risk factors only and a model with both patient-related and procedure or structural-related risk factors, utilizing the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and internally validated concordance probabilities (C-index) for discriminating a 1-day length of stay compared with1-day length of stay.Patient-related risk factors were significant predictors of length of stay (p0.05). A longer length of stay was predicted by older age, higher body mass index (BMI), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, lower VR-12 MCS, and female sex. However, when the procedure or structural factors were added to the patients' risk factors, the AIC decreased by approximately 1,670 units. This indicates that procedure or structural-related risk factors provide clinically relevant improvement in explaining length of stay in addition to patient-related risk factors.Despite patient-related factors such as age, sex, and comorbidities providing substantial predictive value for length of stay after total knee arthroplasty, the main driving predictors of single-day length of stay after total knee arthroplasty were procedure or structural-related factors, including hospital site and surgeon. Understanding the risk factors that affect outcomes after total knee arthroplasty provides the opportunity to influence and potentially modify them favorably to optimize care.

Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) is associated with a higher risk but can be perceived to afford faster improvement and mitigated costs versus staged BTKA. We aimed to explore (1) health care utilization, (2) surgical supply costs of simultaneous BTKA; and (3) 1-year improvement in patient-reported pain, function, and quality of life (QOL) versus staged BTKA.A prospective cohort of 198 simultaneous and 625 staged BTKAs was obtained (2016-2020). Simultaneous BTKA cohort was propensity score-matched (1:2) to a similar group of staged patients (simultaneous = 198 versus staged = 396). Outcomes included length of stay, discharge disposition, 90-day readmission, 1-year reoperation, surgical episode supply cost, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain, KOOS-Physical Function Short Form, and KOOS-QOL. Rates of attaining minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State were calculated.Compared to both staged BTKA surgeries combined, simultaneous BTKA demonstrated shorter median net length of stay (2.00 [2.00, 3.00] days versus 2.00 [2.00, 4.00] days; P.001) but higher rates of nonhome discharge (n = 56 [28.3%] versus n = 32 [4.04%]; P.001), 90-day readmission (n = 20 [10.1%] versus n = 48 [6.06%]; P = .047) and similar reoperation rates (P = .44). Simultaneous BTKA afforded slight reduction in net surgical cost compared to that of both staged BTKAs combined ($643; P = .028). There was no significant difference in 1-year improvement and minimal clinically important difference attainment rates with simultaneous versus staged BTKA for KOOS-pain (P = .137 and P = .99), KOOS-QOL (P = .095 and P = .81), or KOOS-Physical Function Short Form (P = .75 and P = .49, respectively) or Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (P = .12).Staged BTKA is associated with similar 1-year pain, function, and QOL at a better safety profile and minimal surgical supply cost increase compared to simultaneous BTKA.

» As smoking increases the risk of adverse events and leads to increased hospital costs following total joint arthroplasty (TJA), many institutions have introduced perioperative smoking cessation initiatives. Although such programs have been demonstrated to improve outcomes for smokers undergoing TJA, the optimal approach, duration, and timing of smoking cessation models have not been well-defined. » Overall, initiating a smoking cessation program 4 weeks preoperatively is likely adequate to provide clinically meaningful reductions in postoperative complications for smokers following TJA, although longer periods of cessation should be encouraged if feasible. » Patients brought in for emergency surgical treatment who cannot participate in a preoperative intervention may still benefit from an intervention instituted in the immediate postoperative period. » Cotinine testing may provide some benefit for encouraging successful smoking cessation and validating self-reported smoking status, although its utility is limited by its short half-life. Further study is needed to determine the value of other measures of cessation such as carbon monoxide breath testing. » Smoking cessation programs instituted prior to TJA have been demonstrated to be cost-effective over both the short and long term.

BACKGROUND An overall assessment of how patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities are improving or worsening can allow better understanding of the value of revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities trends and episode-of-care outcome trends from 2008 to 2018 in patients undergoing revision TJA. METHODS The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and episode-of-care outcomes in patients undergoing revision TJA from 2008 to 2018 (n = 45,706). Pairwise t tests and pairwise chi-square tests were performed on consecutive years with Bonferroni correction. Trends were assessed using the 2-tailed Mann-Kendall test of the temporal trend. RESULTS Among patients undergoing revision TJA, there was no clinically important difference, from 2008 to 2018, in age, body mass index (BMI), percentages with >40 kg/m2 BMI, diabetes (18.8% to 19%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.1% to 5.4%), congestive heart failure within 30 days (0% to 1%), or acute renal failure (0% to 0.2%). However, modifiable comorbidities including smoking status (14.7% to 12.0%; p = 0.01), hypertension (66% to 26.0%; p = 0.02), anemia (34.5% to 26.3%; p < 0.001), malnutrition (10.4% to 9.3%; p = 0.004), and overall morbidity or mortality probability have improved, with a decrease in the hospital length of stay and 30-day readmission and a significant increase in home discharge (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS Time-difference analysis demonstrated that the overall health status of patients undergoing revision TJA improved from 2008 to 2018. However, formal time-trend analysis demonstrated improvements to a lesser degree. The multidisciplinary effort to improve value-based metrics including patient comorbidity optimization and episode-of-care outcomes for primary TJA has been shown to potentially have an impact on revision TJA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

» Dressing choice following lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty has substantial ramifications for postoperative outcomes and should be carefully made to prevent complications such as periprosthetic joint infection. » Patient risk factors are essential components in the selection of wound dressings in total joint arthroplasty. » Traditional dressings are inexpensive per unit; nevertheless, the associated higher complication profile in patients at a high risk for poor wound healing and sequelae-associated costs may outweigh the up-front savings. » Modern dressings have the potential to yield better safety outcomes and increased patient satisfaction; however, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the ideal interactive dressing. » Active dressings, such as silver-ion dressings and closed-incisional negative-pressure wound therapy, have shown promising results to reduce surgical site and periprosthetic joint infection, especially in patients at a high risk for poor wound healing following hip and knee total joint arthroplasty.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has shown improved reproducibility and precision in mechanical alignment restoration, with improvement in early functional outcomes and 90-day episode of care cost savings compared to conventional TKA in some studies. However, its value is still to be determined. Current studies of RA-TKA systems are limited by short-term follow-up and significant heterogeneity of the available systems. In today’s paradigm shift towards an increased emphasis on quality of care while curtailing costs, providing value-based care is the primary goal for healthcare systems and clinicians. As robotic technology continues to develop, longer-term studies evaluating implant survivorship and complications will determine whether the initial capital is offset by improved outcomes. Future studies will have to determine the value of RA-TKA based on longer-term survivorships, patient-reported outcome measures, functional outcomes, and patient satisfaction measures.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:252-269. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200071

Work relative value units (wRVUs) measure a surgeon's time and intensity required to perform the pre-service, intra-service, and post-service work of a surgical procedure and are commonly used to compare a physician's work between different procedures. Previous literature across multiple specialties report that longer, often revision, operations are undervalued when compared to primary procedures. Our study aims to analyze the differences in intra-operative time, and its corresponding wRVU/h between the Medicare benchmarks and real-world time-stamped data for total joint arthroplasty procedures.Thirteen primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty procedures were identified, and intra-operative times were collected using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases from 2014 to 2019. The Relative Value Scale Update Committee's (RUC) estimated median intra-operative times for each procedure was compared to the calculated median intra-operative times from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, as were their corresponding wRVU/h. Procedures were additionally stratified by "long" (110 minutes) and "short" (≤110 minutes) intra-operative times.The RUC over-estimated intra-operative time by 35.24% on average and this overestimation was more profound in longer operations than shorter operations (47.75% vs 15.22%, P = .011). The RUC intensity per unit time values (wRVU/h) between "long" and "short" procedures were significantly different (P .001) and showed the undervaluation of intensity for the longer procedures by an average of 3.47 wRVU/h.Our study provides further evidence that physician work is undervalued in revision total hip and knee surgeries.