Search

Objective: Our goals were to: establish the maximum-tolerated dose of olaparib tablets combined with metronomic carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with relapsed high-grade serous ovarian cancer; evaluate dose-limiting toxicities; and evaluate efficacy at the maximum tolerated dose., Methods: In this open-label, single-arm, investigator-initiated trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01650376), patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer who failed primary platinum and taxane therapy received oral olaparib tablets twice daily days 1-3 each week combined with fixed-dose metronomic carboplatin AUC2 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 weekly for 3 out of 4 weeks. A 3 × 3 design was used to determine the olaparib maximum tolerated dose. Combination therapy continued until disease progression, but patients with partial or complete response were transitioned to olaparib maintenance therapy. All patients were included in the analysis., Results: The maximum tolerated dose of olaparib tablets was 150 mg twice daily with metronomic carboplatin and paclitaxel. 54 women were enrolled, 14 in phase Ib and 40 in the expansion phase. The median number of prior therapeutic regimens was 3. Response included 13 complete remission (24%) and 16 partial remission (30%) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) for an overall response rate of 54% (95% CI 40% to 67%). Of 47 patients who underwent BRCA testing, 23 were BRCA mutation ( BRCAm ) and 24 B RCA wild type ( BRCAwt ). Progression-free survival for BRCAm was 12.1 months versus 4.8 for BRCAwt (p=0.0001). Median overall survival for BRCAm was 24.1 months versus 10.4 months for BRCAwt (p=0.02). 42 patients (78%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicities with combination therapy; the most common were hematologic. There were no treatment related deaths. Among 14 patients who received maintenance therapy, 7 experienced grade 1-2 non-hematologic toxicities., Conclusions: Olaparib 150 mg tablet twice daily can be safely administered in combination with metronomic carboplatin and paclitaxel in pre-treated relapsed ovarian cancer with 24% complete remission. BRCAm patients had statistically significant longer progression-free survival and overall survival than BRCAwt ., Trial Registration Number: NCT01650376., (© IGCS and ESGO 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Colorectal cancer is common worldwide and chemoprevention has the potential of reducing the number of individuals who may suffer and perish from this disease., Methods: A randomized placebo controlled pilot study in colorectal cancer patients was performed using calcium carbonate as the test agent in a multi-institutional oncology study group., Results: Two hundred twenty volunteers were randomized in the study. The primary goals of compliance, accrual, and toxicity monitoring are presented. Presence of multiple adenomas at study entry and subsequent development of metachronous adenomas were recorded and found to be associated with synchronous adenomas. The secondary endpoint of recurrent adenomas indicated lower rates of new adenoma in the volunteers randomized to the calcium group., Conclusion: This pilot study indicates the feasibility of enrolling survivors of colorectal cancer as study volunteers in a colorectal neoplasm chemoprevention clinical trial and oral calcium continues to be a potentially effective drug in reducing colorectal adenomas., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Patients with advanced pancreas cancer present with disease that is poorly responsive to conventional therapies. Preclinical and early clinical evidence has supported targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway in patients with pancreas cancer. This trial was conducted to evaluate the contribution of an EGFR-targeted agent to standard gemcitabine therapy. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody against the ligand-binding domain of the receptor., Patients and Methods: Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine plus cetuximab. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, objective response, and toxicity., Results: A total of 745 eligible patients were accrued. No significant difference was seen between the two arms of the study with respect to the median survival time (6.3 months for the gemcitabine plus cetuximab arm v 5.9 months for the gemcitabine alone arm; hazard ratio = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.23; P = .23, one-sided). Objective responses and progression-free survival were similar in both arms of the study. Although time to treatment failure was longer in patients on gemcitabine plus cetuximab (P = .006), the difference in length of treatment was only 2 weeks longer in the combination arm. Among patients who were studied for tumoral EGFR expression, 90% were positive, with no treatment benefit detected in this patient subset., Conclusion: In patients with advanced pancreas cancer, the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab did not improve the outcome compared with patients treated with gemcitabine alone. Alternate targets other than EGFR should be evaluated for new drug development.

Objective: While primary cisplatin-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been shown to favorably impact survival in small-volume residual advanced ovarian cancer, there is a need to develop strategies that improve the effectiveness of this approach., Methods: A multi-center phase 2 trial was conducted that added intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (day 8; 30-40 mg/m(2)) to a regimen of intraperitoneal cisplatin (day 2; 75 mg/m(2)) and intravenous (day 1; 135 mg/m(2)) plus intraperitoneal (day 8; 60 mg/m(2)) paclitaxel. Treatment was initially delivered on an every 3-week schedule, but was modified to an every 4-week program due to excessive toxicity. Patients were to receive 6 cycles of this regimen., Results: Of 68 patients entering this trial, 63 patients were eligible and evaluable, of whom 39 (62%) completed 6 cycles. Overall, 32 (51%) experienced at least 1 grade 4 or worse toxicity (most commonly hematologic) including 5 treatment-related deaths. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 25 months (2-year PFS: 52%) and median overall survival 51 months, an outcome similar to previous reports of cisplatin-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy in comparable patient populations. Seventeen patients (27% of all eligible patients) were without evidence of disease recurrence >4 years following entry into the trial., Conclusion: Both the overall trial outcome, and specifically the excessively severe systemic toxicity of this regimen would prevent its future development in this exact form. The provocative PFS in a subset of individuals should encourage the development of alternative strategies designed to optimize the delivery of regional therapy in ovarian cancer management.

Background: The poor prognosis reported for patients with high-grade glial neoplasms indicates a need for the development of multimodality therapeutic approaches. The addition of chemotherapy has contributed variably to increased survival. The objective of the current study (Southwest Oncology Group [SWOG] 9016) was to determine whether concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy with the combination of carmustine and cisplatin could be given safely in a cooperative group setting. Additional objectives included the estimation of response rate, the rate of disease stabilization, and the probability of 1-year survival., Methods: SWOG 9016 study included 59 eligible patients with grade III or IV astrocytoma who received radiotherapy concurrently with carmustine/cisplatin chemotherapy. Patients were required to have either measurable or evaluable disease. The therapeutic endpoints were comprised of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or progressive disease (PD)., Results: Six patients achieved a CR (CR rate of 10%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4-21%), 4 achieved a PR (PR rate of 7%; 95% CI, 2-16%), and 2 patients (3%) experienced an unconfirmed response. Twenty-four patients (41%; 95% CI, 28-54%) had stable disease and 10 patients (17%) demonstrated PD. The overall disease stabilization rate (CR + PR + stable disease, excluding unconfirmed response) was 58% (95% CI, 44-70%)., Conclusions: Despite the presence of a cohort of long-term survivors, the results of the current study do not appear to support the additional study or routine use of concurrent cisplatin and carmustine., ((c) 2008 American Cancer Society)

Background: Many patients with invasive urothelial cell cancer are poor candidates for cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and many are high risk for cystectomy. Southwest Oncology Group Trial 8733 was designed to address treatment for such patients., Methods: Eligible patients had primary or recurrent muscle-invasive disease with transitional cell or squamous cell histology, a performance status from 0 to 2, no extrapelvic disease, a life expectancy >3 months, and adequate hematologic function. The treating clinician assigned patients to operable or inoperable groups. All patients received 2 cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) per day x 4 starting concurrently with radiation at a dose of 200 centigrays per day x 10 each cycle. After 2 cycles, operable patients with positive biopsies underwent cystectomy, and patients with negative biopsies received a third cycle of chemoradiotherapy. Patients in the inoperable group received 3 cycles without interim biopsy., Results: Eighteen of 24 eligible patients in the operable group were evaluable for response. Five patients had a complete response (CR), 9 patients had stable disease, 1 patient had progressive disease, and 3 patients were not assessable. The median progression-free survival was 10 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4-14 months), and the median overall survival was 18 months (95% CI, 7-28 months). In the inoperable group, 35 of 37 eligible patients were evaluable for response with 17 CRs (49%; 95% CI, 31%-66%). The median progression-free survival was 13 months (95% CI, 10-17 months), and the median overall survival was 20 months (95% CI, 11-53 months). There were no episodes of grade 4 toxicity., Conclusions: In the current study, the combination of 5-FU and radiation was found to be tolerated well by patients with numerous comorbidities who could not tolerate cisplatin-based therapy or cystectomy., ((c) 2008 American Cancer Society.)

Inhibition of DNA excision repair can modulate resistance to cisplatin. Cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) and hydroxyurea (HU), in combination, inhibit the excision-repair system and removal of platinum-DNA adducts. Marked cytotoxic synergy had been demonstrated in vitro at clinically achievable levels. The three-drug regimen was found to be feasible in clinical pilot studies. A Phase II study in patients with relapsed or progressive anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) was performed in the Southwest Oncology Group. The primary end point was 6 month survival, historically about 42%. A loading dose of HU 1,260 mg/m2 IV over 1 h was followed by Ara-C 1,200 mg/m2 plus HU 5,040 mg/m2 IV over 12 h, followed by cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV over 1 h. A total of 76 patients were registered. The GBM stratum registered 56 patients in a two-stage accrual. Among 51 eligible GBM patients, the 6-month survival probability was 41% (95% CI 28-55%), and median overall survival was 5 months (95% CI 4-6 months). The 6-month progression-free survival probability was 25% (95% CI 14-37%), and median progression-free survival was 2 months (95% CI 2-4 months). One patient achieved a partial response (2%, 95% CI 0-10%), 13 patients had stable disease (25%, 95% CI 14-39%). Twenty-two patients progressed, and 14 were not assessable for response. The AA stratum was closed early after 20 patients due to slow accrual. Among 19 eligible patients, the 6-month survival probability was 58% (95% CI 36-80%), and median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI 7-14 months). The 6-month progression-free survival probability was 26% (95% CI 6-46%), and median progression-free survival was 3 months (95% CI 2-5 months). No responses were seen. Six patients (32%) had stable disease (95% CI 13-57%), 11 progressed, and 2 were not assessable for response. Of the 70 patients evaluable for toxicity, two died of infection. Twenty-three patients (33%) experienced Grade 4 toxicities, primarily hematological. Cisplatin combined with HU and Ara-C did not improve the 6 month survival rate in patients with relapsed or progressive AA or GBM. Significantly more hematological toxicity was seen than expected from cisplatin alone. Although benefit might be possible in a more platinum-sensitive tumor type, further clinical trials with this regimen for patients with glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic astrocytoma are not justified.

Purpose: The purpose of this Phase II multi-institutional study was to define the efficacy and toxicity of ixabepilone in patients with advance pancreatic adenocarcinoma., Patients and Methods: Patients were required to have pancreatic adenocarcinoma and metastatic or recurrent disease that was not amenable to curative resection. Performance status was 0-1, and patients could not have had prior chemotherapy, or chemoradiation therapy for their advanced disease although prior local palliative radiation was allowed. Ixabepilone was administered iv as a 3 hour infusion every 21 days. Initially, the dose was 50 mg/m(2) but this was lowered to 40 mg/m(2) shortly after the trial opened because of concerns about neurotoxicity., Results: Sixty-two patients were registered however 2 were ineligible because they did not have recurrent or metastatic disease. For the 60 eligible patients, 22 had performance status of 0 and 38 performance status of 1. The estimated 6-month survival was 60% (95% CI 48%-72%) with a median survival of 7.2 months and an estimated time to treatment failure of 2.3 months. Out of 56 patients with measurable disease there were 5 confirmed partial responses for a confirmed response probability of 9% (95% CI 3%-20%) and 7 unconfirmed partial responses for an overall response probability of 21% (95% CI 12%-34%). Common toxicities were neutropenia/granulocytopenia, nausea and vomiting and neuropathy. There was one death, cause not determined but judged "possibly" related to treatment., Conclusion: Ixabepilone shows encouraging activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and should be investigated further in this disease.

Purpose: The purpose of this Phase II multi-institutional trial was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of R115777 in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma., Patients and Methods: Patients were required to have histologically confirmed colorectal cancer with distant metastatic disease that was not surgically curable. They could not have received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. R115777 was given at a dose of 300 mg p.o. twice a day for 21 days every 28 days until tumor progression or toxicity or other reason for discontinuation occurred. The primary endpoint was to determine the confirmed response probability with this treatment., Results: There were 55 eligible patients accrued to the study. There were no complete responses, but one confirmed partial response for a confirmed response probability of 2% (95%CI 0-10%). Three additional patients had an unconfirmed partial response for an overall response probability of 7%. The time to treatment failure was 1.7 months and the estimated median survival was 8.1 months. One patient died of treatment related infection and there were 7 other patients with grade 4 toxicities consisting of neutropenia, leukopenia, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, depression, increased bilirubin, anemia, and pneumonitis/infiltrates., Conclusion: R115777 given as a single agent by this dose and schedule is ineffective in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Purpose: We evaluated the efficacy of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) in node-negative breast cancer patients with and without tamoxifen (TAM), overall and by hormone receptor (HR) status., Patients and Methods: Node-negative patients identified by tumor size (> 2 cm), negative HR, or high S-phase fraction (n = 2,690) were randomly assigned to CMF, CAF, CMF + TAM (CMFT), or CAF + TAM (CAFT). Cox regression evaluated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for CAF versus CMF and TAM versus no TAM separately. Two-sided CIs and one-sided P values for planned comparisons were calculated., Results: Ten-year estimates indicated that CAF was not significantly better than CMF (P = .13) for the primary outcome of DFS (77% v 75%; HR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.27). CAF had slightly better OS than CMF (85% v 82%, HR = 1.19 for CMF v CAF; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.43); values were statistically significant in the planned one-sided test (P = .03). Toxicity was greater with CAF and did not increase with TAM. Overall, TAM had no benefit (DFS, P = .16; OS, P = .37), but the TAM effect differed by HR groups. For HR-positive patients, TAM was beneficial (DFS, HR = 1.32 for no TAM v TAM; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.61; P = .003; OS, HR = 1.26; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.61; P = .03), but not for HR-negative patients (DFS, HR = 0.81 for no TAM v TAM; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.03; OS, HR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.05)., Conclusion: CAF did not improve DFS compared with CMF; there was a slight effect on OS. Given greater toxicity, we cannot conclude CAF to be superior to CMF. TAM is effective in HR-positive disease, but not in HR-negative disease.

Background: There are no published prospective trials of chemotherapy for advanced bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), a subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer for which there is no current standard therapy. This phase II study assesses the efficacy and toxicity of 96-h paclitaxel in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced BAC., Patients and Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or stage IV BAC were eligible. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 35 mg/m2/24 h continuously infused over 96 h (days 1-4) every 21 days for up to six courses., Results: A total of 58 eligible patients were enrolled. The objective response rate was 14% (all partial responses, 9% confirmed); 40% of patients demonstrated stable disease. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 5 and 12 months, respectively. Grade 3 or greater toxicities included neutropenia/granulocytopenia (43%), febrile neutropenia (12%), infection (22%), and stomatitis/pharyngitis (10%); there were five treatment-related deaths., Conclusions: S9714 represents the first prospective multi-institutional cooperative group trial focusing on treatment outcomes in BAC. Studies targeting this population are feasible, and while first-line paclitaxel administered as a prolonged infusion is active in this setting, toxicities limits the utility of this regimen. S9714 serves as a historical control for BAC patients against which future therapeutic approaches can be compared.

Purpose: Modest toxicity and possibly enhanced activity makes continuous-infusion fluorouracil (FU) an attractive alternative to FU plus leucovorin (FU/LV) for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. Intergroup trial 0153 (Southwest Oncology Group trial 9415) was developed to compare the efficacy of continuous-infusion FU (CIFU) plus levamisole to FU/LV plus levamisole in the adjuvant treatment of high-risk Dukes' B2 and C1 or C2 colon cancer., Patients and Methods: After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to CIFU 250 mg/m(2)/d for 56 days every 9 weeks for three cycles or FU 425 mg/m(2) and LV 20 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days every 28 to 35 days for six cycles. All patients received levamisole 50 mg tid for 3 days every other week. The primary end point was overall survival (OS)., Results: The study closed in December 1999 after an interim analysis demonstrated little likelihood of CIFU showing superiority to FU/LV within the stipulated hazard ratio. A total of 1,135 patients were registered. At least one grade 4 toxicity occurred in 39% of patients receiving FU/LV and 5% of patients receiving CIFU. However, almost twice as many patients receiving CIFU discontinued therapy early compared with those receiving FU/LV. The 5-year OS is 70% (95% CI, 66% to 74%) for FU/LV and 69% (95% CI, 64% to 73%) for CIFU. The corresponding 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) is 61% (95% CI, 56% to 65%) and 63% (95% CI, 59% to 68%), respectively. For all patients, 5-year OS is 83%, 74%, and 55%; 5-year DFS is 78%, 67%, and 47% for N0, N1, and N2-3, respectively., Conclusion: CIFU had less severe toxicity but did not improve DFS or OS in comparison with bolus FU/LV.

Background: Colorectal adenomas are the usual precursors to carcinoma in sporadic and hereditary colorectal cancers (CRC)., Methods: A total of 220 CRC patients (stages 0, I, and II) were randomized prospectively in a double-blind pilot study of calcium chemoprevention by using recurrent colorectal adenomas as a surrogate end point. This trial is still in progress, and we report the preliminary findings on adenoma recurrence rates., Results: Synchronous adenomas were present in 60% of patients, and cancer confined in a polyp was present in 23% of patients. The overall cumulative adenoma recurrence rate was 31% (19% in the first year, 29% for 2 years, and 35% for 3 years). The recurrence rates were greater for patients with synchronous adenomas: 38% at 3 years (P =.01). Lower stage was associated with higher adenoma recurrence rates (P =.04). Factors including age, sex, site of primary cancer, and whether the cancer was confined to a polyp were not significantly associated with differences in adenoma recurrence rates., Conclusions: The substantial adenoma recurrence rate in patients resected of CRC justifies colonoscopic surveillance on a periodic basis. Patients with higher rates of adenoma recurrences, such as CRC with synchronous adenomas, are ideal subjects for chemoprevention trials.

Advanced follicular lymphoma is incurable with conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) conducted a phase 2 trial (S9911) of a novel regimen consisting of 6 cycles of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) chemotherapy followed 4 to 8 weeks later by tositumomab/iodine I 131 tositumomab (anti-CD20 antibody) in 90 eligible patients with previously untreated, advanced stage follicular lymphoma. Treatment was well tolerated. Reversible myelosuppression was the main adverse event and was more severe during CHOP chemotherapy than following radioimmunotherapy. The overall response rate to the entire treatment regimen was 90%, including 67% complete remissions (CRs plus unconfirmed CRs [CRu's]) and 23% partial remissions (PRs). Twenty-seven (57%) of the 47 fully evaluable patients who achieved less than a CR with CHOP improved their remission status after tositumomab/iodine I 131 tositumomab. With a median follow-up of 2.3 years, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated to be 81%, with a 2-year overall survival of 97%. This study has established the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of this regimen for patients with advanced follicular lymphoma. This novel treatment appears promising compared with the SWOG's historical experience using CHOP alone and is currently being compared with CHOP plus rituximab in a randomized phase 3 trial (S0016).

Background: Adjuvant combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil plus vincristine and prednisone (CMFVP) was compared with single-agent L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) for the treatment of patients with axillary lymph node positive primary breast carcinoma over 20-years of follow-up., Methods: Four hundred forty-one women with axillary lymph node positive breast carcinoma were randomized to receive either combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (60 mg/m(2) orally every day for 1 year), fluorouracil (300 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] weekly for 1 year), methotrexate (15 mg/m(2) IV weekly for 1 year), vincristine (0.625 mg/m(2) IV for 10 weeks), prednisone (30 mg/m(2) orally on Days 1-14, 20 mg/m(2) on Days 15-28, and 10 mg/m(2) on Days 29-42), or single-agent chemotherapy with L-PAM (5 mg/m(2) orally every day for 5 days every 6 weeks for 2 years) after undergoing surgery. Patients were stratified according to menopausal status and number of positive lymph nodes (1-3 positive lymph nodes or > 3 positive lymph nodes). Seventy-seven patients were ineligible., Results: The maximum follow-up is 24 years, with a median follow-up of 21.5 years. Disease free survival and overall survival were superior with CMFVP (two-sided log-rank test; P = 0.0008 and P = 0.007, respectively). For all patients, the estimated 20-year survival rate of patients who received CMFVP was 40% compared with 27% for patients who received L-PAM. There was a substantial survival benefit for CMFVP compared with L-PAM in the subsets of premenopausal patients and patients with four or more positive lymph nodes. The estimated 20-year survival rate for premenopausal women who received CMFVP was 49% compared with 33% for premenopausal women who received L-PAM. Among women with > or = 4 positive lymph nodes, the estimated survival rate for patients who received CMFVP was 31% compared with 15% for patients who received L-PAM. Both regimens were tolerated well. Toxicity was more severe and frequent among patients who received CMFVP., Conclusions: The authors conclude that, after 20 years of follow-up, adjuvant chemotherapy with CMFVP remains superior to L-PAM for the treatment of patients with lymph node positive breast carcinoma., (Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in American men, and as many as 70% of those initially treated for localized disease will ultimately progress and be considered candidates to receive therapy for metastatic cancer [Fuks et al.: Int J Radiat Oncol Bio Phys 21:537-547, 1991; Chodak et al.: N Engl J Med 330:246-248, 1994]. Although most will respond initially to hormone manipulation, essentially all will fail and require additional therapy. No standard chemotherapy approach has been shown to prolong survival significantly, and new agents are desperately needed. Topotecan is a new topoisomerase-1 inhibitor whose early investigation suggested possible activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer., Methods: In this phase II trial, patients having failed one or two prior androgen ablative therapies were treated with 21-day continuous intravenous infusions of topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) per day every 28 days., Results: Twenty-six eligible patients were entered on the study. There were no confirmed tumor responses. Median survival was 9 months. The most common toxicities were hematologic, with 8 of 24 assessable patients experiencing grade 4 toxicity., Conclusion: Topotecan infusions at this dose are ineffective in the management of hormone-refractory prostate cancer., (Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: It is increasingly important to have timely information about the economic impact of new cancer therapies in today's cost-conscious environment. Nearly 170 000 people are diagnosed with lung cancer annually in the United States. We performed an economic analysis alongside Southwest Oncology Group Trial S9509 to estimate the cost-effectiveness of cisplatin plus vinorelbine versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. There were no statistically significant differences in survival or cancer-related quality of life between the treatment arms., Methods: Use of both protocol and nonprotocol lung cancer-related health care was tracked for 24 months from the initiation of therapy. To determine expenditures, nationally standardized costs were applied to each type of health care service used, and these were summed over time. Lifetime expenditures and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each arm of the trial were calculated with the use of a multivariate regression technique that accounts for censoring. Student's t tests were used to compare the difference in costs between the arms. All statistical tests were two-sided., Results: Cancer-related health care costs over the period of observation averaged 40,292 dollars (95% CI = 36,226 dollars to 44,359 dollars) for patients in the cisplatin plus vinorelbine arm versus 48,940 dollars (95% CI = 44,674 dollars to 53,208 dollars) for patients in the carboplatin plus paclitaxel arm (P =.004), with a mean difference of 8648 dollars (95% CI = 2634 dollars to 14,662 dollars). Protocol chemotherapy drugs and medical procedures costs were statistically significantly higher in the paclitaxel arm (P =.0003 and P<.0001, respectively), whereas protocol chemotherapy delivery costs were statistically significantly higher in the vinorelbine arm (P<.0001). There was no difference between the arms in costs for blood products, supportive care medications, nonprotocol-related inpatient or outpatient care, and nonprotocol chemotherapy., Conclusions: Treatment with carboplatin plus paclitaxel is substantially and statistically significantly more expensive than treatment with cisplatin plus vinorelbine. The majority of the cost difference is due to the additional cost of the protocol chemotherapy (approximately 12,000 dollars). Notable differences in costs of downstream health care were not apparent.

Current information on Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is based on retrospective or single-institution studies of patients requiring therapy. Between 1992 and 1998, 231 patients with WM were enrolled in a prospective observational multicenter clinical trial. Of these, 182 patients with symptomatic or progressive disease were treated with 4 to 8 cycles of therapy with a purine nucleoside analogue, fludarabine (FAMP; 30 mg/m(2) of body-surface area daily for 5 days every 28 days). A serum beta2-microglobulin (beta2M) level below 3 mg/L and a hemoglobin level of at least 120 g/L (12 g/dL) at presentation predicted a lower likelihood of requiring therapy. The overall rate of response to FAMP therapy was 36% (95% confidence interval, 29%-44%), with 2% complete remissions. Patients who were 70 years old or older had a substantially lower likelihood of response (odds ratio, 0.34; P =.004) than younger patients. On multivariate analysis, a serum beta2M level of 3 mg/L or higher, hemoglobin level below 120 g/L, and serum IgM level below 40 g/L [4 g/dL] were significant adverse prognostic factors for survival. We developed a simple staging system for WM by using these variables and identified 4 distinct subsets of patients with estimated 5-year overall survival rates of 87%, 64%, 53%, and 22%, and 5-year progression-free survival rates of 83%, 55%, 33%, and 12%. Prognosis in WM is highly variable and serum beta2M was the dominant predictor of a need for therapy and of survival. FAMP has activity against WM. Our staging system may provide guidance for a risk-based approach to the treatment of WM.

Background: A Phase II trial was conducted to determine the response rate of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma to a three-drug combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and interferon-alpha-2b (IFN-alpha)., Methods: A 2-stage accrual plan was used that was designed to determine whether response to this regimen was consistent with a true response rate of >/= 30%. The regimen was comprised of 5 treatment days weekly for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. Each weekly treatment was comprised of 5-FU, 1750 mg/m(2), continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 24 hours followed by IL-2, 6 MIU/m(2)/day, continuous i.v. infusion for 4 days. IFN-alpha, 6 MU/m(2), was given subcutaneously on Days 1, 2, and 5., Results: Thirty-eight patients were entered on study, 3 of whom were ineligible. Among the 35 eligible patients there were 3 confirmed partial responses (PR) and 1 complete response (CR), for an overall response rate of 11% (95% confidence interval, 3-27%). One patient considered as having a PR had minimal evidence of residual disease and was free from disease progression at > 2.5 years of follow-up, as was the patient with CR. Three additional patients not qualified as having a PR were showing signs of response at the time they were removed from protocol, and another patient who was removed from protocol early for management of an infection subsequently responded to the same regimen off protocol. Thirteen patients were considered nonassessable (NASS) for response, many of whom had multiple poor risk features and were unable to complete 1 cycle of treatment., Conclusions: This multicenter study failed to confirm an advantageous overall response rate for this three-drug regimen. However, there were two durable responses and indications of responsiveness not scored as PRs among patients with more favorable risk factor patterns, and many poor risk NASS patients. For these reasons, the response rate reported in the current study may be a conservative reflection of the effectiveness of this regimen., (Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: We ascertained whether combined cisplatin, methotrexate and bleomycin have efficacy for treating locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the penis, and evaluate the toxicity resulting from this regimen., Materials and Methods: Patients had biopsy proved locally advanced or metastatic epidermoid carcinoma of the penis. Chemotherapy consisted of 75 mg./m.2 cisplatin infused intravenously on day 1, 25 mg./m.2 intravenous bolus of methotrexate on days 1 and 8, and 10 unit per m.2 intravenous bolus of bleomycin on days 1 and 8 with a cycle length of 21 days. Our study was performed as a standard phase II evaluation with 2 stages of accrual., Results: Enrolled in this study were 45 patients, including 40 who were evaluable for a response. There were 5 complete and 8 partial responses for a 32.5% response rate. Five treatment related deaths occurred and 6 of the 36 remaining patients evaluable for toxicity had 1 or more life threatening toxic episodes., Conclusions: A regimen of cisplatin, methotrexate and bleomycin appears to have promising results. However, toxicity was prodigious, and an emphasis of future research should be to decrease toxicity.

Background: This multicenter, Phase II trial was performed to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that had recurred or progressed after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy., Methods: CPT-11 was given as a 90-minute intravenous infusion in repeated 6-week (42-day) courses comprising weekly treatment for 4 consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week rest. Tumor measurements were obtained after every second course of therapy. Toxicity was assessed weekly using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria., Results: A total of 166 patients were entered into the trial. The first 64 patients received a starting dose of 125 mg/m2. An additional 102 patients were enrolled at a starting dose of 100 mg/m2 to determine whether a reduction in the starting dose would result in lower toxicity without sacrificing efficacy. Objective responses to CPT-11 were observed in 18 patients (1 complete response and 17 partial responses) (response rate [RR] = 10.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1-15.6%). An additional 67 patients (40.4%) had stable disease as their best response. At the 125 mg/m2 starting dose, the RR was 14.1% (9 of 64 patients; 95% CI, 5.5-22.6%). Among patients given a starting dose of 100 mg/m2, the RR was 8.8% (9 of 102 patients; 95% CI, 3.3-14.3%). The overall median survival was 9.9 months (range, 0.3-36.8 months). The most frequently observed Grade 3/4 toxicities were gastrointestinal events (i.e., diarrhea [27.1%], nausea [15.1%], emesis [9.6%], abdominal cramping [22.2%], and neutropenia [19.9%]). There were no significant differences in the frequencies of Grade 3/4 toxicities between the 125 mg/m2 and 100 mg/m2 starting dose levels except for Grade 3/4 emesis (21.9% vs. 2%; P < 0.001). Patients age > or = 65 years were twice as likely (38.6% vs. 18.8%; P < 0.008) to develop Grade 3/4 diarrhea compared with younger patients when all courses of therapy were evaluated. However, older age did not significantly predict for a higher incidence of first-course diarrhea (25.0% vs. 14.7%; P = 0.106)., Conclusions: CPT-11 can induce tumor regression in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that has progressed during or shortly after 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Gastrointestinal events and neutropenia were the most common serious toxicities. Given the trend toward a higher response rate without substantially greater toxicity, 125 mg/m2 has been selected as the preferred starting dose for further studies. Careful attention to appropriate CPT-11 dose modification and early intervention with loperamide may be especially important in elderly patients.

Purpose: We evaluated the vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) regimen alone or with chemosensitizers for remission induction and interferon (IFN) versus IFN plus prednisone (IFN/P) for remission maintenance in previously untreated multiple myeloma., Patients and Methods: Two hundred thirty-three patients were registered for remission-induction therapy with VAD or VAD plus the chemosensitizers verapamil and quinine. Patients who achieved remission were randomized to maintenance therapy with IFNalpha 3 MU in the evening three times weekly or IFN plus 50 mg of prednisone (IFN/P) on the morning after IFN until relapse., Results: Two hundred twenty-nine patients were eligible for induction. Fatal toxicities in nine patients who received VAD plus verapamil and quinine led to closure of this arm after 47 registrations. Subsequently, all patients received VAD induction. Despite the high early mortality rate on VAD plus sensitizers, overall survival by induction arm did not differ for median or 5-year survival with approximately 40% of patients surviving 5 years. Eighty-nine eligible patients who achieved remission were randomized to maintenance. Patients who received IFN/P had improved progression-free survival (median, 19 v9 months for IFN; P = .008). After 48 months, progression-free survival on IFN/P was at the thirtieth percentile, whereas it was below the tenth percentile on IFN alone. Median survival from start of maintenance was long on both arms (57 months for IFN/P v 46 months for IFN; P = .36)., Conclusion: IFN/Pwas more effective than IFN alone. Improved relapse-free survival may be attributable to IFN/P or to the use of prednisone for maintenance. This latter alternative is currently being studied.

Up to 30% of patients with advanced germ cell tumors will fail induction chemotherapy or will relapse. New agents with activity in this still potentially curable subgroup of patients are needed. Edatrexate (10-ethyl, 10-deaza-aminopterin) is a methotrexate analogue that has preclinical and clinical activity in breast, lung, and head and neck cancers, as well as in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. A phase II trial of edatrexate in relapsed or refractory malignant germ cell tumors was conducted by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG). Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the trial. Edatrexate was administered intravenously at a dose of 80 mg/m2 weekly for four weeks followed by a one-week rest period. The treatment course was repeated every five weeks. Among the 23 patients evaluable for response, there were no objective responses with all patients developing progressive disease. Thirteen patients (56%) developed Grade 3-4 toxicities, predominantly stomatitis and malaise/fatigue/lethargy. One patient developed Grade 4 anemia while another developed grade 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia. No patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity nor were there any toxic deaths. Edatrexate administered in this dose and schedule has no antitumor activity and has substantial toxicity in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors.

Purpose: To determine whether the addition of surgical ovariectomy to standard chemotherapy prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer with positive axillary nodes., Patients and Methods: Three hundred fourteen premenopausal patients with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled between July 1979 and July 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive either of the following: (1) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (2) bilateral ovariectomy followed by CMFVP., Results: The median follow-up time is 7.7 years and the maximum 13.2 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (one-sided log-rank, P = .55 and .70, respectively). The 7-year survival rate is 71% on the CMFVP arm and 73% on CMFVP plus ovariectomy. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets., Conclusion: We conclude that, in this study, the addition of ovariectomy did not improve results over chemotherapy alone in the treatment of premenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer. Our sample size was too small to detect a small improvement. The death hazards ratio of CMFVP/CMFVP plus ovariectomy was 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], .79 to 1.89).

Purpose: To compare chemohormonal therapy, chemotherapy alone, and hormonal therapy alone in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes with respect to survival and disease-free survival (DFS)., Patients and Methods: Eight hundred ninety-two postmenopausal women with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) from July 1979 to March 1989 and 74 by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) between June 1987 and March 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive the following: (1) tamoxifen 10 mg twice daily by mouth for 1 year; (2) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 IV weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone during weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (3) the combination of tamoxifen and CMFVP., Results: The median follow-up duration is 6.5 years, with a maximum of 12.8 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (log-rank, 2 df, P = .82 and .23, respectively). The 5-year survival rate is 77% for the tamoxifen arm, 78% for CMFVP, and 75% for the combination. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. Severe or worse toxicity was experienced by 56% of patients on CMFVP and 61% on CMFVP plus tamoxifen, compared with 5% on tamoxifen alone., Conclusion: CMFVP chemotherapy, either alone or in combination with tamoxifen, has not been shown to be superior to tamoxifen alone in the treatment of postmenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer.

Background: The use of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors has been of limited value, and investigation of new agents is necessary. Previous reports have suggested that dimethyltriazenoimidazole carboxamide (DTIC) may have antitumor activity., Methods: A Phase II trial to investigate the clinical response rate to DTIC in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors was performed. DTIC was administered at low (650 mg/m2) or high (850 mg/m2) doses every 28 days., Results: Sixty-three patients were entered into the study, and 56 were evaluable for toxicity and response. Toxicity was moderate, with the most common side effect being nausea and vomiting (88%). Nine patients (16%; 95% confidence interval, 8-28%) had partial responses, 5 of 25 receiving 850 mg/m2 and 4 of 31 receiving 650 mg/m2 of DTIC. Median survival time of all patients was 20 months., Conclusions: DTIC has minimal activity in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors.

Purpose: To determine if prolonged adjuvant treatment (2 years v 1 year) with combination chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil [5-FU], vincristine, and prednisone [CMFVP]) in poor-prognosis breast cancer patients (estrogen receptor [ER]-negative, stage II to IIIA) would result in improved disease-free and overall survival rates., Patients and Methods: Four hundred forty-five women with ER-negative node-positive breast cancer were enrolled by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) over a period of 5 years (1979 to 1984). Randomized assignments were made to either 1 or 2 years of adjuvant CMFVP. Doses were daily oral cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2, intravenous (i.v.) weekly methotrexate 15 mg/m2, i.v. weekly 5-FU 400 mg/m2, i.v. weekly vincristine .625 mg/m2 for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone weeks 1 through 6 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 10 mg/m2., Results: The median follow-up duration is 8.6 years, with a maximum of 11.3 years. Treatment arms were not significantly different as regards either survival or disease-free survival rates (P = .33 and P = .24, respectively). The five-year survival rate is 57% on the 1-year arm and 62% on the 2-year arm. Patients with three or fewer nodes and premenopausal status were associated with improved survival. Compliance on the 2-year arm was poor, with only 37% completing the full 2 years of treatment. SWOG grade 3 to 4 toxicity was experienced by 47% of patients on the 1-year arm and by 52% on the 2-year arm. There were no treatment-related deaths., Conclusion: We conclude that 2-year adjuvant treatment with CMFVP is not an improvement over 1-year treatment. Moreover, 2 years of CMFVP is difficult to complete. However, the results are not definitely negative. A moderate improvement attributed to prolonged chemotherapy, especially among patients with four or more positive nodes, cannot be ruled out.

In a Southwest Oncology Group phase II clinical trial, 68 patients with hormone refractory carcinoma of the prostate were treated with a combination of doxorubicin, mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil. Of the patients 11 were classified as good risk and 57 as poor risk. There were 1 complete and 10 partial remissions for a response rate of 16.2% (exact 95% confidence interval 8.4 to 27.1%). Median survival was 9 months (maximum 14) for good risk patients and 10 months (maximum 42) for poor risk patients. Toxicity was significant with leukopenia identified as dose limiting. Because of the low rate of response and significant toxicity, this regimen cannot be recommended as standard therapy for metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Purpose and Methods: Doxorubicin alone or with dacarbazine (DTIC; AD) is considered the best available therapy for metastatic adult sarcomas. Ifosfamide is active in sarcomas that have failed to respond to a doxorubicin-based regimen. This study was designed to determine if ifosfamide added to doxorubicin and DTIC (ADI) significantly effects toxicity, response rate, and survival. Patients with measurable metastatic or unresectable sarcoma were randomized to receive AD or ADI. Patients with chondrosarcomas, fibrosarcomas, and other sarcomas of bone were eligible, although those with osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, and mesothelioma were excluded, as were patients with prior chemotherapy for sarcoma or prior doxorubicin., Results: Between 1987 and 1989, 340 eligible patients were randomized. Significantly more myelosuppression, a higher response rate (17% v 32%; P < .002) and longer time to progression (4 v 6 months; P < .02) were observed for patients who received ifosfamide. An overall survival advantage for the two-drug regimen (12 v 13 months; P = .04) was not significant by multivariate analysis., Conclusion: In all three randomized trials of doxorubicin with and without ifosfamide (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG], European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC], and this study), the response rate was higher for the ifosfamide-containing arm, significantly so in this and the ECOG studies. An improved response rate may be particularly important for the preoperative management of high-grade, borderline resectable lesions or pulmonary metastases, particularly in younger patients. In older patients, or for low-to intermediate-grade lesions, doxorubicin and DTIC followed by ifosfamide on progression is preferred.

Background: Hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer remains a therapeutic challenge. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF), a drug combination that is active in solid tumors, was evaluated using specific response criteria., Methods: Fifty-two eligible patients with measurable (19), evaluable (29), or bone scan only (4) metastatic prostate cancer were treated with cyclophosphamide, 100 mg/m2 every day by mouth, methotrexate, 15 mg/m2 intravenously weekly, and 5-fluorouracil, 300 mg/m2 intravenously weekly. Treatment was given continuously unless interrupted by toxicity or disease progression., Results: There were two partial responses (7%) among the evaluable patients. Six (32%) measurable patients and four (14%) evaluable patients had stable disease. Median time to progression was 3.2 months for measurable and 2.8 months for evaluable disease patients. Median survivals were 10.9 and 10.2 months, respectively. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to response rate or survival. Toxicity was acceptable and consisted primarily of myelosuppression., Conclusions: CMF is minimally active in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer.

Purpose: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) protocol 8228 is a prospective trial designed to investigate the prognostic significance of progesterone receptor (PgR) levels in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients who were treated with tamoxifen. This study was undertaken because the value of PgR measurements in advanced breast cancer had been assessed previously only in studies that were small, retrospective, or included heterogeneously treated patients., Methods: Receptor assays were performed only in the laboratories that met strict quality control guidelines. Of the 398 patients entered, 342 patients were eligible and assessable for the study end points of objective clinical response, time to treatment failure, and overall survival., Results: Multivariate analysis shows that elevated PgR levels significantly and independently correlated with increased probability of response to tamoxifen, longer time to treatment failure, and longer overall survival. Overall response rate (defined as complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease [SD] for greater than 6 months) in this trial was 54%. Response rates to tamoxifen were 43%, 53%, and 61% in subsets of patients with less than 10, 10 to 99, and more than 100 fmol/mg PgR, respectively. Exploratory subset analysis using PgR and other prognostic variables identified ER-positive patient subsets with response rates to tamoxifen ranging from 24% (premenopausal patients) to 86% (postmenopausal patients with ER greater than 38 and PgR greater than 329 fmol/mg). No groups of ER-positive patients were identified who had such a low response rate as to absolutely preclude considering the use of tamoxifen. Multivariate analysis showed the independent, statistically significant predictors were: for response to tamoxifen, menopausal status, PgR, and ER; for time to treatment failure, menopausal status, disease-free interval (DFI), PgR, and ER; and for overall survival DFI, PgR, ER, site of disease, and history of adjuvant therapy., Conclusion: We conclude that knowledge of PgR levels together with other clinical information can improve the pretreatment assessment of ER-positive breast cancer patients with metastatic disease.

Twenty four patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were treated in a phase II trial with amonafide 300-450 mg/m2/day on days 1-5 every 21 days. There were no responders, 6 patients had stable disease, 14 experienced progressive disease and 4 were assumed to be non-responders as no evaluation was performed. There were no fatal toxicities although 8 patients had grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, 1 patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea in 1 patient, grade 3 myopathy in 1 patient, severe nausea and vomiting in 1 patient and a facial rash, possibly a hypersensitivity reaction, in 1 patient. The median survival is 7.5 months. At this dosage and schedule, there is no evidence that amonafide has meaningful anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

In this phase II multicenter trial, the efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone (Novantrone; Lederle Laboratories, Wayne, NJ) were evaluated in the treatment of 206 patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD) previously treated with other agents. Sixty-nine percent of the patients had received prior therapy with doxorubicin. The patients received 14 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone every 3 weeks. Nineteen (12%) of the NHL patients and two (7%) of the HD patients had complete responses (CRs). The combined CR and partial response (PR) rates were 37% (60 of 163) for NHL patients and 36% (10 of 28) for HD patients; the median duration of response was 323 days for NHL patients and 209 days for HD patients. The median survival times were 337 days for patients with NHL and 469 days for patients with HD. The median survival time for patients with low-grade NHL was 589 days compared with 298 days for patients with intermediate-grade NHL and 167 days for patients with high-grade NHL. The median time to treatment failure was 73 days for NHL patients and 98 days for HD patients. The major toxicity was myelosuppression, which was moderate and reversible. Nausea, vomiting, and alopecia were mild. There were two cases of congestive heart failure (CHF) considered related to treatment; both patients had received prior treatment with doxorubicin. In this group of heavily pretreated patients, mitoxantrone was effective and well tolerated. Responses were seen with mitoxantrone in patients who had relapsed after prior therapy with doxorubicin and in patients who had failed to respond to prior therapy with doxorubicin. Mitoxantrone should be evaluated in less heavily pretreated patients and should be considered for incorporation into combination chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of malignant lymphoma.

Between March 1986 and May 1988, the Southwest Oncology Group enrolled 58 previously untreated patients with limited small-cell lung cancer on a treatment program that administered high-dose cyclophosphamide (150 mg/kg) as late intensification. Treatment consisted of induction chemo-radiotherapy, (weeks 1 to 11), consolidation chemotherapy (weeks 11 to 18), and intensification (week 18). Median age was 61.5 years. Eighty-nine percent of patients had a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) performance status of 0-1. Twenty-one patients completed all prescribed treatments. There were seven treatment-related deaths, four as a result of intensification. Fifty-six patients are available for response analysis. Thirty-two patients achieved a complete remission (CR) (57%) and fifteen achieved a partial remission (PR) (26%). Median survival for all patients is 11.1 months. Among the 21 patients who received intensification, nine remain alive in a CR with a median survival of 27 months. This sequence of treatments was not associated with a survival advantage for the group as a whole, possibly because of the toxicity of induction and consolidation treatment and the delayed administration of high-dose cyclophosphamide.

Fourteen evaluable patients with diffuse malignant mesothelioma were treated with a once-a-day for 5 days out of 7 for 6 weeks regimen of recombinant interferon-beta (IFN-beta ser). No responses were noted. The major toxicities included fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, and anorexia. IFN-beta ser at this dose and schedule does not appear to be an active single agent for patients with refractory malignant mesothelioma.

Twenty-eight patients with a uterine stromal sarcoma or mixed mesodermal tumor were treated with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and Adriamycin 45-60 mg/m2, given with intravenous hydration every 3 to 4 weeks. Group I consists of 11 patients with measurable disease following initial surgery or with a recurrence. Eight of the eleven evaluable patients with measurable disease had a response (73%), and three of these patients have had a negative second-look procedure, and two are alive and disease free more than 24 months after initiation of treatment. Group II consists of 17 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy after primary surgery. The patients were selected for adjuvant therapy based on previous established poor prognostic features. Of the 17 patients in group II, 14 had invasion of the outer one-third of the myometrium and the other three had invasion to the middle one-third. Seven had documented positive pelvic and/or periaortic lymph nodes and five had positive peritoneal washings. With a median follow-up of 34 months, there have been only four recurrences in group II. Two of the recurrences occurred in patients who discontinued therapy after only two cycles of chemotherapy. There is a projected 5-year survival of 75% in these high-risk patients. Of the seven patients with documented nodal involvement, one patient died with a recurrence at 23 months, one patient died from a perforated diverticulum, and the other five are alive and disease free with a median follow-up of 36 months (34-90 months). Two patients with multiple positive nodes are disease free at more than 5 years. Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and Adriamycin has a high response rate with advanced measurable disease and improves survival in high-risk patients who receive it as adjuvant therapy.

From 1981 through 1985 the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) conducted a study evaluating the natural history and the effectiveness of standard therapy in those patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from non-hematologic malignancies. Twenty-six patients were evaluated for the effectiveness of treatment; those who responded to therapy by one month exhibited a median additional survival of 5.7 months and those who were not responders at one month exhibited a median additional survival of 1.8 months. We were unable to identify pre-treatment clinical characteristics which would predict for a favorable response to therapy. Aggressive treatment in some patients may be indicated, as those patients who respond to treatment may have a survival benefit. The overall prognosis in this patient group remains exceedingly poor.

Twenty-three patients with gallbladder and cholangiocarcinoma were treated with m-AMSA at doses of 60-120 mg/m2 i.v. repeated at 4-week intervals. Toxicity was primarily hematologic. Partial responses occurred in 1/12 patients with gallbladder cancer and 1/11 patients with cholangiocarcinoma. The activity of m-AMSA in these neoplasms appears similar to that seen in hepatomas.

One hundred and fifteen eligible patients with histologically verified malignant gliomas (astrocytoma grade III-IV) were randomized to receive either radiotherapy 6 000 rads/7 week plus CCNU 130 mg/M2 every 6 weeks (treatment 1) or radiotherapy 6 000 rads/7 weeks plus CCNU 75 mg/M2 day 1 plus procarbazine 100 Mg/m2 days 1-14 every 6 weeks (treatment 2) within 4 weeks following surgical resection. The response rates showed no statistically significant differences between treatment 1 CR/PR - 24/17% and treatment 2 CR/PR - 14/14% (P-value = 0.31). The median survival was also not significantly different: 55 and 50 weeks for treatments 1 and 2, respectively. The most important prognostic parameter identified was age with younger patients showing higher response rates and longer survival. Patients' performance status was also a useful prognostic parameter for response and survival. Neither the extent of surgical resection nor the tumor grade correlated significantly with the outcome. Further studies are needed to identify active chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of brain tumors.