Search

Your search keyword '"Riviere, Deniece"' showing total 11 results
Start Over Author "Riviere, Deniece"
11 results on '"Riviere, Deniece"'

4. Patients with Clinically Suspected Gallstone Disease: A More Selective Ultrasound May Improve Treatment Related Outcomes

Author

Thunnissen, Floris M., primary, Comes, Daan J., additional, Geenen, Remy W. F., additional, Riviere, Deniece, additional, Latenstein, Carmen S. S., additional, Lantinga, Marten A., additional, Schers, Henk J., additional, van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M., additional, Drenth, Joost P. H., additional, Atsma, Femke, additional, and de Reuver, Philip R., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer

Author

Gurusamy, Kurinchi Selvan, Riviere, Deniece, van Laarhoven, C. J. H., Besselink, Marc, Abu-hilal, Mohammed, Davidson, Brian R., Morris, Steve, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Surgery, CCA -Cancer Center Amsterdam, and APH - Methodology

Subjects
Endocrine System Procedures, Decision Analysis, Economics, Science, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Social Sciences, Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures, Endocrine System, Research and Analysis Methods, Digestive System Procedures, Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatectomy, Exocrine Glands, Gastrointestinal Tumors, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Pancreas, Surgical Resection, Decision Trees, Cancers and Neoplasms, Biology and Life Sciences, Length of Stay, Economic Analysis, United Kingdom, Health Care, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Oncology, Quality of Life, Medicine, Engineering and Technology, Laparoscopy, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Anatomy, Management Engineering, Research Article
Abstract

BackgroundA recent Cochrane review compared laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for people with for cancers of the body and tail of the pancreas and found that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy may reduce the length of hospital stay. We compared the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.MethodModel based cost-utility analysis estimating mean costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. A decision tree model was constructed using probabilities, outcomes and cost data from published sources. A time horizon of 5 years was used. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken.ResultsThe probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the incremental net monetary benefit was positive (£3,708.58 (95% confidence intervals (CI) -£9,473.62 to £16,115.69) but the 95% CI includes zero, indicating that there is significant uncertainty about the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy. The probability laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was cost-effective compared to open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer was between 70% and 80% at the willingness-to-pay thresholds generally used in England (£20,000 to £30,000 per QALY gained). Results were sensitive to the survival proportions and the operating time.ConclusionsThere is considerable uncertainty about whether laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is cost-effective compared to open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in the NHS setting.

Published
2017

11. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy in benign, premalignant, and malignant disease.

Author

Riviere D, van den Boezem PB, Besselink MG, van Laarhoven CJ, Kooby DA, Vollmer CM, Davidson BR, and Gurusamy KS

Subjects
Humans, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Robotic Surgical Procedures methods, Robotic Surgical Procedures adverse effects, Pancreatic Diseases surgery, Pancreaticoduodenectomy methods, Pancreaticoduodenectomy adverse effects, Laparoscopy methods, Laparoscopy adverse effects, Precancerous Conditions surgery, Pancreatic Neoplasms surgery
Abstract

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the benefits and harms of laparoscopic or robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for people with benign, premalignant, and malignant disease., (Copyright © 2024 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results