Search

Progress in precision medicine is being achieved through the design of clinical trials that use genetic biomarkers to guide stratification of patients and assignation to treatment or control groups. Genetic analysis of biomarkers is, therefore, essential to complete their objectives, and this involves the study of biological samples from donor patients that have been recruited according to criteria previously established in the design of the clinical trial. Nevertheless, it is becoming very common that, in the solicitation of biological samples, purposes that are beyond the objectives of the stated therapeutic trial research are introduced, like the development of ill-explained exploratory studies or the use in unspecified future research. In the digital era, the sequencing of patients' DNA needs to be considered as a serious security matter, not only for the patients, but also for their relatives. Genetic information may be easily stored, even forever, in digital files. This engenders a permanent risk of being stolen or misused in many ways. Furthermore, re-identification of sample donors is technically feasible through their genetic data. For these reasons, genetic analysis of samples collected in clinical trials should be restricted to the accomplishment of their main objectives or well justified goals.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) predisposes to the development of dermal and plexiform neurofibromas and serum of NF1 patients stimulates neurofibroma proliferation in vitro. This study aimed to determine whether, in NF1 patients, serum levels of midkine (MK) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) were associated with the number and/or type of neurofibromas. In addition, their concentrations were correlated with serum levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), a neurosteroid secreted by the peripheral nervous system. We performed a case control-study and measured, by ELISA assay, serum concentrations of MK, FGF2, and DHEAS in 20 NF1 patients and 30 controls. We found increased serum levels of MK and FGF2 in NF1 patients between 30 and 50 years old. Their concentrations were significantly higher in NF1 patients with plexiform neurofibromas than in controls (P=0.003 for MK and P=0.008 for FGF2). As an underlying hormonal regulation was suspected, DHEAS serum levels were measured but no difference was observed between patients and controls. We also observed a strong association between MK and FGF2 levels (P=0.0001) in NF1 patients and controls. In conclusion, we point out MK and FGF2 as biomarkers for plexiform neurofibroma in NF1 patients. As both growth factors are estrogen-responsive genes and neurofibromin is a co-repressor of estrogen receptor alpha activity, we suggest that the increased serum levels of MK and FGF2 observed in NF1 patients might be due to estradiol hypersensitivity., Competing Interests: None., (AJTR Copyright © 2022.)